Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Grupo Supervielle's Second Quarter Earnings Call. I'm Ana Bartesaghi, Treasurer and IRO. Today's conference call is being recorded. As a reminder, all participants will be in listen-only mode. To ask questions during the Q&A session, ensure your first and last name appear on the Zoom platform. Questions can be asked by voice or through the Q&A box. Speaking today will be P atricio Supervielle, our Chairman and CEO, and Mariano Biglia, our Chief Financial Officer. Gustavo "Paco" Manriquez, Banco Supervielle CEO, and Diego Pizzulli, CEO of invertirOnline, will also be available during the Q&A session. Thank you, Ana. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us today. We executed well amid a still transitional macro backdrop. Loan growth outpaced the industry, led by strong performance in commercial lending. By contrast, we took a more cautious approach to retail origination in response to the slight deterioration in asset quality in line with industry and historical levels. This follows the rapid retail expansion of prior quarters and return to credit normalization. On funding, U.S. dollar balances reached record levels, gaining 100 basis points in market share over the past 12 months, underscoring both our competitive position and client trust. We maintained a solid capital position with a CET1 ratio of 13.9% and delivered a 6% return on equity in real terms, further supported by disciplined cost management and improved NIM. While the macro environment still presents some near-term headwinds in connection with the election-related uncertainty, tight peso liquidity, and high real interest rates, the broader backdrop remains supportive, with public government support at nearly 50%. Fiscal consolidation, ongoing deregulation, and inflation trending down. We expect economic growth and credit expansion to resume after the October 26 elections, supported by structural reforms anticipated to begin in the post-election period. These conditions, combined with our strategic execution and solid capital, position us to continue capturing opportunities as the credit gains momentum. On slide 4, our strategic transition towards a more credit-driven balance sheet is progressing, although at a slower pace in this election year and in line with monetary policy. Loans accounted for 48% of total assets, up 25 percentage points since December 2023, while we reduced our investment portfolio by 28 percentage points to 22% of assets. This deliberate rebalancing supports private sector credit growth to benefit from the gradual recovery in economic activity. Our loan-to-deposit ratio increased to nearly 72%, while leverage stood at 6.5 x, well below historical levels, providing ample capacity to continue expanding our portfolio in a disciplined, profitable way. On slide 5, I'm pleased to share that we are seeing tangible, early results across the four key initiatives which are central to how we engage clients, build loyalty, and drive cross-sell. First, our innovative remunerated account that we are selectively offering in line with our cluster-based strategy continues to deepen primary banking relationships and expand our deposit base. Payroll-linked balances increased sequentially by 27% in pesos and 18% in U.S. dollars, with new payroll accounts increasing by 53% year to date. Among SMEs, checking accounts increased 14% in pesos and 43% in dollars. Second, Tienda Supervielle, our online store, hosted on Mercado Libre and integrated into our app, has surpassed 500,000 sessions since launch. This initiative, which complements our value proposition with the MELI platform, resulted in more than 175,000 customers transacting with over 400,000 registered credit cards. This is further evidence that we are embedding ourselves in our clients' daily lives and increasing engagement beyond traditional banking. Third, our GenAI-powered WhatsApp banking channel was recently enhanced with new transactional features, including credit card purchases, authorizations, transportation card reloads, and mobile top-ups, turning WhatsApp into a daily banking companion. Adoption is growing rapidly. In July alone, the channel registered over 150,000 interactions, posting exponential growth since launch, reinforcing its role as a scalable, convenient service touchpoint. Fourth, new synergies between the bank and invertirOnline, our leading online broker, are delivering solid results, leveraging IOL's 1.7 million customers to showcase banking products while preserving IOL's core identity as an investment platform. In just four weeks since launch, over 4,700 invertirOnline clients placed $28 million in dollar time deposits at the bank, with nearly 1/3 for terms over 180 days. With only 3% of IOL's clients currently banking with us, we are launching a targeted cross-sell strategy with a compelling suite of products aimed at deepening relationships and expanding our retail footprint. Lastly, since adding the IOL button to our mobile app just two months ago, we've seen a clear increase in investment activity among bank customers. These early outcomes give us confidence that our strategy can drive engagement, diversify revenues, and capture growth opportunities as Argentina embarks on a renewed expansion cycle. With that, I'll turn the call over to Mariano Biglia, who will walk you through our financial performance and perspectives for the year. Thank you, Patricio, and good day to all. Let's turn to slide 6. Net income was ARS 13.6 billion in the second quarter, up 62% sequentially, with ROE at 6%, driven by higher net financial income and lower inflation adjustment. Clients' net financial income was up 10%, supported by wider spreads on higher loan volumes, while market-related net financial income benefited from gains in our treasury portfolio, growing 15% quarter-on-quarter. Inflation adjustment decreased 34%, reflecting the lower impact in the net monetary position from declining inflation versus the prior quarter. By contrast, net fee income was down 13%, as banking fees were not adjusted in the quarter, though repricing is underway in the third quarter. A lower contribution from our brokerage business since the lifting of FX restrictions, in line with the industry trend, also impacted fee income. Expenses were up 4%, as costs were seasonally lower in the prior quarter. Year-to- date, net fee income was up 19%, while expenses declined 11%, as we continue to simplify our structure and reduce fixed costs. Loan loss provisions rose 32%, reflecting loan growth and higher risk weighting from retail lending. Other losses increased 40%, mainly from the sale of non-core properties, while income tax benefited from a higher level of tax efficiency. Moving next to slide 7, total loans increased 14% sequentially and 71% year-on-year in real terms. Growth in retail loans moderated to 2% sequentially after several quarters of strong expansion, as we tightened underwriting policies in response to early signs of industry-wide asset quality deterioration. Other retail products, including credit cards, mortgages, and car loans, continued to expand modestly. Year-on-year, retail loans were up 130%, accounting for 47% of our total loan book. Commercial lending was up 23% quarter-on-quarter, led by strong growth in foreign-trade loans, promissory notes, and overdrafts, as corporate activity accelerated with commercial, now representing 53% of our portfolio. This rebalancing toward commercial lending reflects our disciplined credit stance, while retail remains an integral part of our strategy for the long term. Turning to slide 8, our NPL ratio was 2.7%, in line with both historical and industry levels. Retail delinquency was 4.5%, reflecting credit normalization following the 130% year-on-year growth in retail loans and the impact of a lower inflationary environment on repayment dynamics. The NPL ratio was a low 1.4% for corporate and SME loans. Coverage is present at 130%, and we continue to fine-tune origination and collection strategies to preserve portfolio health. Provisions rose 32% sequentially to ARS 44.5 billion, lifting net cost of risk by 70 basis points to 5.5%. This was mainly due to higher provisioning needs in retail loans under our forward-looking credit models. Importantly, delinquency levels remain fully within the assumptions embedded in our pricing, and we are adjusting origination where appropriate, while continuing to fund demand in segments with the strongest risk-adjusted returns. Turning to slide 9, total funding increased 30% year-on-year and 6% sequentially, supported by strong dollar deposit inflows and a growing contribution from corporate notes, which now account for 6% of total funding. Peso deposits were up 24% year-on-year and up 1% sequentially. U.S. dollar deposits were up 154% year-on-year and 16% sequentially, setting another record high at $943 million as we deepened transactional relationships with our clients. The positive trend continued into July, with U.S. dollar deposits exceeding $1.1 billion. This solid funding base positions us to continue expanding loans while maintaining a prudent liquidity profile. The recent increase in the minimum cash requirements for money market funds, unifying reserve requirements on demand deposits across all depositors, allows us to pay the same interest rate to a corporate checking account as to a money market fund, allowing banks to compete with money market funds in attracting customers and thus improve the deposit mix. On slide 10, net interest margin expanded 160 basis points sequentially to 20.8%, supported by strong spreads in both client and market-related portfolios. Total net financial income expanded 12% from the first quarter, as client-related net financial income increased 10% on higher spreads and loan growth, while market-related net financial income rose 15%, driven by better investment returns as treasury bond yields stabilized after last quarter's sharp correction ahead of the IMF agreement in April. As shown on the right-hand charts, loan portfolio margins improved to 22.8% and investment portfolio margins to 20.1%. The peso interest spread also widened 200 basis points to 23.1%, supporting the overall NIM recovery. Turning to slide 11, reflecting the election year and a longer transition period towards a more loan-centric balance sheet into 2026, we are updating our 2025 perspectives. We now expect real loan growth between 40%- 50%, contingent on monetary policy and regulatory developments, and a more balanced mix between retail and corporate loans. On deposits, we anticipate growth of 20% - 30%, with continued improvements in the loan-to-deposit ratio. Peso deposits' growth will depend on monetary policy, while we see further share gains in US dollar deposit balances. In terms of asset quality, we expect the NPL ratio to stabilize at historical levels between 3% - 3.5%, with net cost of risk at the 5% - 5.5% range, reflecting ongoing credit normalization and the higher share of retail loans. Finally, NIM is expected to trend between 18% -20%, slightly below 2024 levels, as inflation continues to decline, leverage increases, and following restrictive monetary policy. Turning to slide 12, we maintain expectations of net fee income growing 10% in real terms this year, driven by higher bank fees, asset management growth, and improved insurance penetration. In brokerage, we expect to leverage new business lines to offset lower revenues of dollar-mapped transactions following the lifting of FX controls. On expenses, our focus remains on driving sustained efficiencies in headcount and other costs, contributing to a contraction in expenses of between 5%- 8%, driving stronger operating leverage. With this, we now expect ROE to improve toward year-end to a range of 5%-1 0% below our original full-year guidance, as transition towards a more leveraged balance sheet is longer than expected due to a tighter monetary policy and higher volatility ahead of legislative elections. This revised outlook reflects margin stabilization, stronger fee contributions in the second half, and the full impact of our cost efficiency initiatives, while factoring the dynamics of our election year. Lastly, we now anticipate the CET1 ratio to close the year between 12%- 13%. There is potential for upside if regulators approve Basel III operational risk treatment for Group 2 banks in line with systemic banks, in which case our CET1 ratio would have been approximately 16.7% as of June 30, 2025. Overall, these targets reflect our disciplined and confident approach to balancing growth, profitability, and capital strength as we navigate an election year and its still evolving macro environment. Additional details on our quarterly performance are available in the appendix of our earnings presentation. We are ready to take your questions. Ana, please go ahead. Thank you, Mariano. At this time, we will be conducting the question -and- answer session. As a reminder, to ask a question, you need to be connected to the Zoom platform. To ask a question, please press the raise your hand button and press it again to withdraw your question. You can also send your questions in written form via the Q&A box. We will ask you to limit yourself to one question and a follow-up, and then you can raise your hand again in another round. One moment while we poll for questions. The first questions come from Ernesto Gabilondo at Bank of America. Hello, good morning, Ernesto. Good morning, Ana. Thank you. Hi, good morning, Patricio, Paco, and Mariano, and good morning to all your team, and thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. My first question will be on asset quality and cost of risk. When looking to the NPL ratio, it remains still below historical peaks, but in terms of the cost of risk, it appears to be a little bit high. I am just wondering if the peak already happened in the second quarter and how should be the trend for next year. Thank you, Ernesto. Yes, it's true. The NPL ratio in the last two quarters increased from 2%- 2.7%, which is a meaningful increase. As you said, it remains well below historical standards, and we believe it's part of an industry-wide trend with credit normalization following a very, very low historical NPLs. We believe that at this stage, the economy, what's happening is also not creating jobs. Employment is stable, but it's not creating jobs. There is also a behavioral change related to a new pattern because before there was inflation, and with inflation, customers would take a loan, and they would expect that the installments in real terms, they would dilute. This is no longer happening. There is a learning curve for customers. We still think that overall the credit portfolio is healthy, and we basically are continually adapting underwriting standards more stringent, and this is dynamic, of course, in order to make sure that our portfolio remains healthy. By the way, also recall that on the retail side, we mostly work with clusters that are cash flow-based, that is payroll accounts where we pay the salaries and we collect the loans, or senior citizens who have a historical good performance in terms of loans or car loans. Sorry, I don't know if you want to add— Oh, yes, I would like to add two things. As Patricio mentioned, the customers suffered a big change in their behavior because they know how to work with inflation in the past, and now they need to understand how is this scheme without inflation. This is a big change in their behavior. Also, in terms of management, I took several measures, actions in order to make change in the scores and also in the credit policy. Basically, I have a weekly meeting, one hour, one and a half, one hour, one and a half, in order to observe all the trends and all the sales and all the pin touch in order to keep down the credit ratio. We are talking on several measures, and we are observing that as a weekly basis. Thank you very much. Just on cost of risk, because that explains the NPL ratio, but on cost of risk, how should we think about it? You mentioned it could be between 5%- 5.5%. I think it was above 6% in this quarter. I just wanted to confirm if it has peaked for you, and how should it be evolving for next year? Should it be stable, deteriorating, or improving after all these policy metrics that you are implementing? Yes, hi, Ernesto. Let me take that part of your question. Yes, effectively, we expect the cost of risk to be in a peak at this 4.5% net cost of risk for the quarter. We expect it to range between 5% - 5.5% for the year. It should be stable within that range also into 2026. As Patricio mentioned, this is also a normalization of the credit portfolio, particularly the retail segment. Changes will be more dependent on the mix of retail versus corporate, but we don't expect to go higher in this range. Perfect. Thank you, Mariano. My second question, it will be on your ROE expectations, but for next year, as you mentioned, for this year, it could be around 5% -1 0%. Just wondering, what should be the level that the ROE could be getting into next year? Just an idea of where can it go again. Sure. Yes, as you said, we expect ROE to range between 5%- 10% this year as the monetary policy is still very stringent, and there is some volatility ahead of the October elections. I still expect the monetary policy to stabilize and interest rates to go back down again after the October elections, which are by the end of October. Maybe the upside in the ROE and resuming low growth in high growth rates will be only for the end of this year. We will see the benefits entering into 2026, where we expect to have an increase in ROE. It could be 15% for the year, but increasing quarter over quarter. It's still too early to tell how we are going to be in the fourth quarter of 2026, but we could be over that average for the year of 15%. Maybe it levels between 15%- 20%. No, perfect. Super helpful. Thank you very much. Gracias, Ernesto. Thank you, Ernesto. Our next question comes from Brian Flores with Citi. Hello, good morning, Brian. Please go ahead. Hi, team. Good morning. Thank you for the opportunity. I have a question on growth because you revised your guidance downwards. I wanted to ask you if this has more to do with what is happening with organic funding, which is deposits, right? You also revised downwards. Do you think it has to do more with capital? Your Tier 1 ratio, because as you saw and as we have seen, you perhaps have one of the lowest Tier 1 ratios in the system. Of course, you mentioned there could be some regular tailwinds. If you could explain a bit on what changed your risk appetite and also on that front, on the Basel III implementation that could happen for your segment, if you have a timeline as to when you could have this impact if you know there's any provision here. Let me start. Maybe I will be complemented by my team. Basically, we are going through, at this stage, a macroeconomic transition, of course, with the fiscal anchor and also foreign exchange anchor. This disinflation process will continue up to next year. At this stage, the monetary policy is very restrictive. While we believe that there will be a relaxation, as I think Mariano mentioned, after elections, this is, of course, having an impact this year in terms of growth because there is scarcity of funding in the system, basically with pesos particularly, not with dollars, but with pesos. However, we believe that there is going to be an upside following elections in the sense that with the reform agenda of President Milei, there will be a much better business confidence, more investments, and therefore more credit demand. In our case, what we are, I think we are doing is laying the groundwork for the loan recovery by what we have done in the past three months. We launched on a cluster-based strategy of remunerating accounts for payroll accounts, as well as SMEs. This is showing a very strong effect driving principality with those clusters. It is, of course, increasing the funding. We are very happy with the results. We will continue. By the way, we are about to launch in the next few weeks a joint marketing campaign between Banco Supervielle and invertirOnline in order to make sure that we propose this remunerated, I mean, this value proposition, even a stronger value proposition than the one we have today, through invertirOnline clients in order to attract funding. Looking forward, we believe that we are handling, we are tackling the funding issue. Concerning the capital issue that you mentioned, we don't feel constrained with capital at this stage. Of course, if conditions arise in the sense that there is a very strong loan demand next year and the market conditions are there, then it might be possible that we tap the market. We are looking into opportunities of tapping the market in equity as well as in debt. Yes, it's important to highlight that capital is not restricting the loan growth for this year. The loan growth that we are projecting is more related to the profit in deposit and structural funding. Also, we are looking at other sources of funding, as Patricio said. Regarding you asked also about the Basel III at central bank regulation, of course, we cannot anticipate when or whether the central bank will change this regulation, but we are optimistic because we think it was not in the spirit of the regulation to be more punitive with the second group of banks. If they fix it before year-end, that will be a significant increase in our Tier 1 ratio too. We are optimistic on that. No, thank you, Mariano and Patricio. Super helpful. Wanted to make a quick follow-up on invertirOnline because I think this was the first quarter where not only we saw a decrease, and I think this decrease, you mentioned it in the press release, has to do with the liberalization of the FX that naturally hurts maybe some of the spreads. What was catching our attention here is we saw a decrease in the active users in the platform. I know you have here in the team maybe who can provide a better explanation as to what has happened, but is this an increase in competition? Is this an increase on, I don't know, promotions by other teams? Just wanted to understand why this decrease in active customers happened during the quarter. Thank you. Yeah. Hi, Brian. We have two factors that influenced our business in the first quarter and the second quarter also. The first one was that we saw lower trading volumes by retail customers in the Argentina stock market, mainly equities and CDRs. That was a trend that started in February, was heading down until July when it reversed. The other one was the dollar map and the lifting of the restriction in this market. We don't see an issue in our value proposition regarding our competitors. We have a strong value proposition. We are leading in the digital market. We're still leading and we are in a solid position there. What we saw is some behavior of investors in Argentina, in Argentinian securities, with the lateral market in January and something that reversed now in July. Also, the thing you mentioned about the liberalization of restrictions in FX, of course, we are now competing with banks for that part of the business in FX because it was before only a business for brokers and now it's banks and other institutions. We think it's moving forward and looking forward. We believe that it's a good... We are optimistic about the future on the transactions and the volumes operated because with inflation going down and the FX under control, both preconditions to have a strong capital market, we are very well positioned to capitalize on that. We think in this new environment that is through a transition, as we see it, to a more mature capital market, we can capitalize in our not only retail business, but also in our private banking, SMEs, and institutional business that probably in this environment will thrive. We believe we are very well positioned to capitalize on that. No, perfect. Super clear. Thank you. Thank you, Brian. Gracias, Brian. Our next questions come from Carlos Gomez with. Hello, good morning, Carlos. Thank you for asking questions. Please go ahead. Hello, good morning, and thank you for holding the call. The first question is I would like to know how you are faring with the current volatility in interest rates that we are seeing in Argentina and the very high levels that we have seen recently. Is that, first, is it material? Is it going to affect the banking system in general? How long do you think it will last? The second, going back to the capital, maybe I should ask that later. Going back to the capital, I just wanted to verify, the rules have not changed from the first to the second quarter, right? The banks have not been able, the banks of your size have not been able to use Basel III. When was that implemented? My point is that the decline in 150 basis points or so in this quarter, that, I mean, that would have happened with or without the capital rules. Is that correct? I will start from the second question because it's shorter. It's correct. The change in operational risk capital requirements was implemented in the first quarter. Any change in the capital ratio from the first quarter to the second quarter is not related to that. We are only giving guidance on how the capital will be if that regulation equalizes the Group 2 to the Group 1 of systemic banks level. It has already been implemented at the end of the first quarter. That will be a 200, and from your description, 280 basis points uplift to your CET1 if you were able to apply Basel III. That's your own calculation, I would imagine, right? Correct. That's our own calculation. Just something in addition to this last question. Remember, in this quarter, we had dividend payment. That is included in what you mentioned in terms of CET1 declining from one quarter to the other one. Very clear. Thank you. Loan growth, but also we had dividend payment. Remember, we as Grupo Supervielle, we only pay once, normally in the second quarter. Thank you so much. Regarding the first question, yes, it's basically this uplift in interest rates has been very significant. Of course, it is affecting the monetary conditions of banks and the liquidity crunch. Very high real interest rates, I think they are harmful for the economy, but we believe that it's going to be transitory until elections. They will relax because basically they want to make sure that not only inflation goes, there is no pass-through from the valuation to prices. This is why they are very extremely restrictive. I don't know if you want to add. Yes, I agree. This is a level of real interest rates that we have ever seen at least in recent years. We firmly believe it's temporary. It's not a level of rate that is sustainable in the long term because it will have an impact not only in the financial industry, but in the overall economy. What we believe is that the central bank and the government are prioritizing the control of the volatility in the exchange rate. They prefer to have volatility in interest rates, but not in the exchange rate, which is more sensitive for inflation and for consumers ahead of the elections. Remember, in three weeks, we have elections in the province of Buenos Aires that are like a thermometer for the national elections. This level of interest rates is after the September elections or at the latest after October elections. That's at least our view. What is the rate that affects your clients, right? Because we, I mean, there have been all these changes in monetary policy. There is no set reference rate, if I understand correctly. What is the most used benchmark? Is it BADLAR? Is it a different market interest rate? How has that evolved relative to what we see in terms of monetary policy? Yes, for instance, the TAMAR interest rate is now at 50%. The one-day interest rate is at 67%. That's, of course, well above an inflation expected for the next 12 months of 20%- 25%. Those are the rates that impact mainly in short-term loans because for the longer-term loans, we are expecting a decrease in the interest rates. They are not as affected as one-day loans or 30-day loans. It affects mainly the corporate side of the portfolio. When your corporates borrow from you, most of the contracts are based on BADLAR or TAMAR or what rate? It's a market interest rate, but it's affected mainly by the TAMAR interest rate. It's not that they take long-term loans at variable rates. Some cases are like that, mainly for the ones who issue in the capital market for overdrafts or discounted documents. The market interest rate, of course, takes as a reference both the TAMAR and the one-day interest rate because that's a finding for the very short term. TAMAR was 32% or so before this volatility? Yes, correct. Thank you so much. Thank you, Carlos. Our next question comes from Pedro Offenhenden with Latin Securities. Good morning, Pedro. Good morning. Hi, everyone, and thank you for the call. I had a question following Ernesto, one on NPLs. Didn't get if you think retail NPLs have already peaked on the second quarter and if you see further pressure on SMEs given the rate volatility. Yes, what we are seeing, Patricio explained the dynamics of the NPLs on the retail side. The system is now, last data published as of May, at 4.5% NPLs. We are in line with the system. We see a peak in the cost of risk. The NPLs could go a bit higher, as we gave in our guidance for the overall NPLs combining retail and corporates. By the year-end, we expect it to range between 3%- 3.5%, whereas we are now at 2.7%. For NPLs, there could be a little room to grow until the year-end. Yes, Pedro, if we maintain this level of rates, we will see some pressure to SMEs. Yes, of course. This transition is a short period, but we are seeing some pressure to SMEs in terms of working capital, basically. We hope that it's a very short period. If we maintain this kind of level of rate volatility, we will see some pressure to the SME segment. Also to the corporate, no, because the one-day money is very, very high. Agreed. Okay, thank you very much. Thank you, Pedro. I'm sorry, do you have any follow-up? No, no follow-up. It was clear. Okay. Okay. Thank you. Bless you. Thank you. No, I will answer. Maybe we will answer first some of the Q&A we have in the box, and then we have further questions from the audience. The first one comes from Marco Serú from Allaria. It's a very technical, maybe it is for you, Mariano. I would like to know how much was the charge registered under other expenses for the sale of the non-core properties? The net loss registered in that line item was ARS 5 billion. Of the total of that line item, that is the part that is related to the sale of non-core properties. Okay. Another from Ernesto Gabilondo with [Bank of America. On the macro and political landscape, what would be the key dates to follow? For example, the election of the province of Buenos Aires? Yes, of course, the election of the province of Buenos Aires is the first one in September to follow. I think from what I have read, it will be maybe difficult to understand the results because maybe there will be, let's say, depending, there will be overall on the province one result when favoring maybe La Libertad Avanza, and maybe another result in a particular district of the conurbano where there will be another winner. Maybe. We don't know. What I think will be much more powerful is the October election, where definitely we are seeing that there is a continued support for the president policies above 50%. This will probably, if this is what we expect, be a very strong support for the second term of the mandate after the October elections. Okay. We have another question from Fernando Zabaleta, I think with Banco Pichincha. Hello? Good morning, Fernando. Thank you for asking questions. Please go ahead. Good morning, everybody, and thank you for the call. My question goes in line with Ernesto's first question and this follow-up that you just commented. It's in line with the NPL and the projections. You're still projecting a 40%- 50% increase in loans. We have seen the loans increasing during the year. Also, Patricio mentioned before that it's been a challenge to create jobs for the government. My question goes in line with how difficult or how important, I think Ernesto just asked the same question, is the election that you have because the last election is in October. How will it impact your projections? I think it was mentioned before too how you guys are thinking on controlling the increase of the NPL and not to get to a ratio where it could be kind of difficult to manage. It goes in line to that. Just considering that the last election is in October and the country could be going in different directions, how difficult would it be or how it would change or the different scenarios for you guys that you are managing or evaluating to meet those projections of 40% -50% increase in loans? Thank you. First of all, I think that personally, I'm very optimistic with, as I said, with the October elections in the sense that these are the important ones. As I said, the September election in the province of Buenos Aires might be difficult to understand. It's difficult to understand. The October elections is basically what will give the mandate for the second part of the government. Milei has stated that in the second part of his government, he will concentrate in fiscal reform and labor reform. I believe that also what would happen is that there will be an uplift or liberation of the foreign exchange market for corporations after the elections. The business climate will improve. We expect this, and this will drive loan demand. I don't know if I answered your question, but maybe. Yes. Also, remember that these projections are based on a macro scenario where we see inflation at 28%. The interest rate that I mentioned before now jumps 50%, but we expect it as low as 25% for year-end. That is a scenario consistent with a good result for the government that will foster loan growth. Perfect. Thank you. Very clear. Thanks. Thank you, Fernando. Thank you, Fernando. I think we have a follow-up from Brian Flores with Citi. Brian. Yes, team. Thank you very much for the opportunity here. Just wondering on your NIM expectation because I think you maintained at 18%- 20%. We saw the contribution from commercial loans growing significantly quarter over quarter, which obviously has to do with the conditions you are seeing in terms of asset quality on the retail side. Could you elaborate a bit on what are you expecting in terms of contribution from retail versus corporates in that projection that you're making on NIM? Is this already including a higher contribution from commercial loans, or is it 50/50? Just wondering here how's the composition by year-end in your view. Yes, Brian, thank you for your question. What we expect is to have an almost even contribution. We expect the portfolio to maintain this 50% for each of the banking segments. We could see some change by the end of the year, but for the contribution to the NIM, it will be more or less balanced as we expect. Okay. Just a quick follow-up here. If we see, for example, I don't know, worsening conditions in retail, would you pivot and be a bit more aggressive on the commercial side, or you will go along with the plan because penetration is still low? Yes, in that case, we would be more aggressive on the commercial side. Also, on the retail side, we have longer duration loans. It's not that even in that case, if we're with agent on the credit conditions for individuals, the loan portfolio will not grow sharply. Even in our base case scenario, in our base scenario, not best case, we expect to be adjusting our credit policies, but allowing the loan portfolio to grow in a healthy manner. No, thank you. Very clear, Mariano. Thank you. Gracias. We have another question in the Q&A box. I think we have about five minutes to take it. First one, as the Argentinian economy stabilizes, do international financial institutions interested in getting into the Argentine market? Any worries, concerns? I think yes. I would say that we've seen and we've heard, and we know that there are new players coming into the market, successful neobanks in Europe or big techs that are applying to become banks. I think this is a very positive signal, first of all, for Argentina in terms of confidence in Milei's government and what his agenda. I think this is the first thing, very positive. Of course, in our case, our challenge is to continue strengthening our competitive position, to continue simplifying and digitizing our operations to make it simpler and agile for customers. I believe that what we have done in terms of remunerated accounts has been the first bank in the country to do this. We are anticipating what the fintechs will do when they start playing in the market. This is something that we believe will give us a good competitive position. In addition, all these international players, they are looking to individuals. Some of them, maybe the bottom line of the pyramid, the underbanked, some of them. The others, maybe another one might be on, let's say, on the premium side. No one at this stage is really taking care of SMEs. We believe in a balanced approach. We believe that the way looking forward for us to compete is to have a balanced approach and to provide good services with all the SMEs, particularly the value chains of dynamic industries, and make sure that we get the cash management, making sure that we provide trade finance and leasing and so on. This is going to be our anchor, as well as the payroll accounts. We believe that in this sense, we will be able to compete effectively. Okay. I think we have reached the end of today's Q&A session. Thank you for joining us today. We appreciate your interest in our company, and we look forward to meeting more over the coming months and providing financial and business updates next quarter. In the interim, we remain available to answer any questions that you may have. Have a good day.