Good afternoon, everyone, and welcome to the Bannerman Energy Quarterly Webinar Update for the September 2025 quarter. For those of you that don't know me, I'm Emma Culver, Investor Relations Manager at Bannerman Energy, and I'm pleased that many of you were able to join us today for the update. We're joined today by our Executive Chairman, Brandon Munro, who many of you know or would have seen online. Brandon will provide a short update on Bannerman, the progress at Etango in this last quarter. Following that, we will have some time for Q&A. At the bottom of your screen, for those of you that aren't familiar with Zoom, there is a tab that says Q&A. Please write your questions in there, and at the end, we will be able to get through them in a timely manner. If you can pop them in there, that would be greatly appreciated. Before I bring Brandon on, I will just bring up our slides for the presentation. Just bear with me for one moment as I get these loaded up. Okay, here we go. I'm just going to share these here. Great. Brandon, welcome to the webinar. Thank you for joining us. There has been a lot happening at Etango in the last quarter. You were on site this quarter. You got out to Namibia, so I'm sure you were pleased with the progress that you saw. There has been a lot happening in the sector as well. I'm sure everyone is excited to hear from you, especially as we've had a bit of a run this week in equities. Thanks, Brandon. Thanks, Em. Thanks very much to everyone for joining us. Another exciting quarter for Bannerman. Yes, I was on site in August, and it was just fantastic to see the progress with my own eyes. It's been an excellent quarter. If we just touch on the highlights for this quarter, as we've put out in the quarterly update, we start, as mining companies often do, with safety. I just want to put a line under this 16 years lost time injury-free at Etango. That's an extraordinary achievement. The people who are on this call who've got a background in mining, you'll understand quite readily the exceptional amount of discipline and crafting of a safety culture that's required to ensure that you can, as a company and as a project and a team, actually achieve such a long-standing record. We weren't hard at it all of that time. There were periods of time where there wasn't a lot of activity, but we do have a lot of activity at the moment. We've just notched up a million man-hours lost time injury-free. That's a big achievement. For the investors on the call who perhaps don't have their own operational background in mining, what you need to take away from that is Bannerman has a very sophisticated approach to risk management. Health and safety is a very important part of risk in its own right, but it also goes to how we manage a whole variety of risks in this company. The team is absolutely outstanding in Namibia. As the Chairman of the company, I feel enormously proud to be able to talk to you about that milestone that we've achieved, clocked over yet another year lost time injury-free, and now a million man-hours lost time injury-free. We're also pleased to say that the early works construction is proceeding on time, on budget, those two magic words that every project developer and investor wants to hear. In terms of confidence in what we're set out to do here, we're managing with Gavin Chamberlain's leadership the execution risk very, very well. We've got the benefit of having these early works construction activities where we can, if you like, really get match fit ahead of the much more extensive work that will be on site shortly. We've had about 120 contractors on site. That's shortly about to grow to 400 contractors. It's so pleasing as a board member and as a shareholder to see that the team is functioning very, very well. We've got that management of risk, budget, and schedule all under control before we start expanding this on-site contractor workforce. We've also detailed in the quarterly how the progress on detailed design is going. We've got 70 or so engineers in Johannesburg, an entire floor of Wood PLC's office there, working away on a full-time basis on this detailed design, as well as our own owners, people sitting in that office on that floor, keeping an eye on them. A lot of our corporate strategy has been optimizing corporate flexibility as we wait for this uranium market to improve. This approach is consistent with that. There's maybe a couple of dozen employees in the company against moving to 400 contractors on site and 70 or so engineers in Johannesburg. There's a lot of activity going on, but we've taken the sensible corporate decision of ensuring that that's mainly a contractor workforce at this point. A big announcement for us during the quarter was signing our initial off-take agreements. We can talk some more about that, I'm sure, in question time. The key point here is this is a small proportion of our product. It's between 5% and 6% of our planned production. What it does is it establishes our credibility and gives us very strong external validation in the broader nuclear sector, and particularly with our future customers. This is a conservative industry. This is an industry that tends to want to see things in front of them with their own eyes before they make decisions. The fact that we've got two of the very largest, very most important, and most respected U.S. utilities, and for that matter, private utilities in the world, who've contracted with us, who've proceeded through all of the external consultant due diligence, who've had site visits, who've been through the whole process from initially agreeing basic terms to working through all of the nitty-gritty and legalities required to be able to sign one of these final form contracts, that positions this company and our project exceptionally well. I think as a shareholder, I know that some shareholders have got concerns about that it's early in the cycle, and that's true. It is early in the cycle, but it's only 5% or so of our production that is locked in at these prices. That becomes such an enabler for us in so many other ways with this project, including what I mentioned, as well as making additional contracting as we see the market conditions improve much easier and putting us in a much stronger negotiating position by virtue of the fact that we have signed some initial contracts. Really strong cash balance. I hope as investors, what you're taking from this is our fiscal discipline. We started the quarter with about AUD 140 million in cash. We've got AUD 112 million of that still in our cash. Of course, we deployed AUD 13 million towards buying spot units, which we now disclose as liquid assets. Really strong discipline. We're not letting that big cash balance burn a hole in our pocket. Almost the entirety of that is going into productive use in the company, going into the ground, going into these early works activities. We're being very disciplined about that and the way that we deploy our cash and maintaining a very, very strong balance sheet to optimize that corporate flexibility that I talked about. Of that AUD 111 million in cash, we've now progressed commitments in the early works construction to the tune of about AUD 50 million. We're committed to that work. We're happy with that work. It's enabled us to lock in attractive prices and get the right contractors and ensure that the construction is moving, the early works construction is moving forward. As you can see, that still gives us a very large cash buffer. That is what gives us the level of corporate flexibility that's so important as this market starts to really turn and improve. Finally, talking of the market, we've now seen two changes to the term contract price in the last several months. It's now moved from $80 a pound to $84 a pound. That might not sound like a lot, but if you plug that number into our NPV, we're talking about a plus 15% increase in our NPV across the different Etango A to Etango XT and the Etango XP scenarios. Even because of the extraordinary leverage that Bannerman Energy delivers, that 4% growth in the term contract price has now increased our NPV by more than 15%. That's not, in our opinion, the end of the term contract price growth. We're expecting this market to really improve over the coming months. By signing a couple of small commitments via top tier one utilities, we're really well positioned to take advantage as we see that term contract price and other market conditions continue to improve. Let me show you what we have been doing on site. What you're looking at there is the heap leach ponds. It's hard to give a full appreciation of the scale of this project. Let me explain it to you in the way that I experienced this when I was on site in August. The heap leach pads, there's 10 pads that are each roughly 300 meters long by 100 meters wide. This is an area that needs to be very, very flat, very carefully engineered, that is 300 meters by a kilometer. The gradient from one end of that 300 meter side to the other falls by only several percent. That's just to get a very gentle drainage from one end to the other. The civil works and the civil engineering that's going on at the moment on site is actually very precise. It's all done with lasers, and the contractors are doing an excellent job. I share that with you just because of the pure scale of what is being undertaken at the moment. Moving on to the next slide, we've now got full power on site. The power infrastructure on site will also serve us for construction, but also into operations. When we move from construction to operation, we will need to upgrade the offsite power, but everything that we've got now is going to serve us for decades to come. That puts us in a really strong position. With the site power now being fully operational, that's the completion of all of the pre-construction infrastructure that we needed to do. What you're looking at here is a primary crusher box cut. We decided during the FEED process, front engineering and design, that we could optimize the crusher by semi-sinking it. What I mean by that is we looked at having a crusher on surface, and it would stand roughly 10 meters high. We looked at submerging it, which has extra civil works, but means that there's less of a gradient for all of the haul trucks to drive. We optimized the NPV by deciding to submerge it by 5 meters, so half sinking it. Less diesel, less turnaround time, and the point where the CapEx associated with what you can see on the screen demonstrably improved the OpEx and was a very effective trade-off. We've now awarded the phase one concrete works, and you can see from that 3D design that that's what it'll look like. You can see big retaining walls there as well as the concrete works that will install the primary crusher when we're ready for that phase. Now, the expensive part of this is the kit. We don't need to order the kit yet. We don't need to order that primary crusher. They're readily available. They're a very standard size, but it is quite time-consuming to get the concrete work and all of the civils done. Hence why we've moved this aspect of the project forward, and we continue with these less capital-intensive civil bulk earthworks to ensure that when we're ready to place the order on the primary and secondary crusher, everything's ready for the delivery of those pieces of equipment. Now, this is where the tertiary crusher will be installed, and you can see from the inset, that's the 3D design. That photograph is a real live example of the HPGR that is currently being packaged for delivery to Namibia. When we looked at the long lead items, we undertook a risk assessment to understand what do we need to lock in now to reduce the risk that supply might not be available, or we could head into some huge mining bubble, or there could be a huge amount of activity or lack of constraint in lack of supply availability in Southern Africa. Fairly standard when it comes to construction, but for investors out there, we wanted to know what we needed to lock down now so that we wouldn't get bitten later by supply constraints. As I said, the primary and secondary crusher are relatively off the shelf. They're a very standard size. They're readily available at short notice. The tertiary crusher that you can see there is a more sophisticated piece of kit. We took the decision that in some circumstances, we might have to wait for that, and we don't want that to become a bottleneck. We placed that order last year, and Gavin and the team went up to the factory in Germany to do all of the factory acceptance testing and make sure that everything was perfect as we needed it. That is now on its way to being put on the sea to be delivered to Walfish Bay. You can just see yet another shot of some of the bulk earthworks. Hopefully, you'll stick around for the flyover or access it via YouTube to get a full appreciation of what's happening on site. Emma, let's go to Q&A. We've got plenty of time for the various questions that are coming up. Yeah, thanks, Brandon. We'll jump straight into it. The timing of the spend for the early works commitments of AUD 49.2 million, what is that? Does the AUD 31.5 million on the early works and the AUD 49.2 million of commitments come off the total CapEx, or is this in addition? Thank you. This question refers to, in our quarterly, we stated that we've already constructed roughly AUD 30 million worth of early works construction. We've now, as I said before, given commitments for another AUD 50 million of that. Yes, they do. They are part of the pre-production capital that we stated in our CBE estimate, which is $353 million. We've been at this project with this early works construction for almost a year now. Part of our philosophy and part of our corporate strategy was to do this work because it was time-consumptive, but not particularly capital-consumptive. As you can see, we've achieved a huge amount on the ground, both in terms of impact on the project, but in particular, impact on the project timeline in return for that $30 million. It's starting to ramp up a little bit more. That $50 million includes more expensive items, such as the concrete and so on, and that will still be delivered over the next 18 months. Part of that $50 million, for example, is the balance of the bulk earthworks contract, which was a 24-month contract when we first awarded it. Brandon, is there going to be much exploration spend in FY 2026? What's the expectation on that? We're not spending any money on exploration at the moment. Perhaps what that question's driving at is the exploration and development expenditure, and that relates to the $50 million. We don't need to do any exploration at current in Etango, and all of the work that we're doing relates to the early works and pre-construction activities of the Etango mine. Great. We have a question in regards to the initial off-takes here. I think that there's going to be a few people curious in regards to the thought process around those initial off-take agreements. We just have someone here sharing with us that they believe that most of us believe that the price is going higher in uranium. How can investors be assured that we will sign contracts at higher market levels going forward? I think that's a broader question. I'll leave you to input on that. Yeah, look, I certainly agree with you. I think that prices are going up from here. The off-take strategy and the concept of portfolio optimization is not a simple concept. I'll try and break it down in a way that investors can appreciate where our strategy is coming from. First principle is there's roughly a dozen contracts, perhaps even more, that will make up the total portfolio for Etango's initial production of 3.5 million pounds. Those contracts aren't signed as a singular event. They're signed over time and negotiated over time. As I said at the outset, there's a great deal of value for us as a company and as a project to get those first couple of initial contracts and all of the external validation and credibility that comes with that signed and into the public domain. We certainly think that they will look cheap over time, but that is worth it because it's only a small volume. It's only a small proportion of our production. We believe that as part of our contract portfolio optimization, the enhanced credibility and the fact that we've now got those contracts into the public domain, we will get that value back through our negotiating strength on the balance of the portfolio. It's not as simple as saying waiting until the uranium price reaches X, you know, call it $100 a pound if that's what you've got in your mind, and suddenly saying, right, now's the time. Now we're ready to contract 3.5 million pounds. Everyone make an orderly queue. It doesn't work like that in this sector. You need to be layering contracts in over time. In these cases, they're very, very large utilities who we've contracted with on very small volumes. Because we've now got a contract in place with them, if those utilities choose to come back to the market in a higher price environment, for example, it's going to be a lot easier for us to double down or triple down or even more on that volume. That's an example of how these become an enabler. We're in a position to write the balance of these contracts over the next 12, 24 months, even beyond that, as we see the market strengthen. As an investor, the crux of that question, how can you feel assured that we're going to sufficiently optimize this market? There's a number of things that we've done. Unlike many in the sector, we waited until we saw this type of pricing before we were prepared to make initial commitments. We, of course, could have done that at $65, and many people were surprised that we didn't do it at $65. We wanted to ensure that our starting point was already locking in and delivering attractive economics for our project. We've demonstrated over a long period of time that we've been prepared to make decisions based on a market outlook that, by and large, and in general, has proved to be correct. We were an absolute outlier on our view on this uranium market for many years. We've stuck to our guns, and so far, our forecasting has stood the test of recalibration over a long period of time. We do have an in-house view on where we think the uranium market's going. It's not something I'm able to disclose publicly, but we will be layering in contracts and steadily, we believe, improving the contract portfolio, both the ultimate received price, the balance of fixed price and market-related contracts, where those floors are set, where those ceilings need to be given, and the overall exposure to an increasing uranium market. There's one final point that I'd make on this. That's our initial production of 3.5 million pounds. By the time we're in production, we would expect to have the large majority of that contracted. As I say, we expect that it'll be at different steps up as the term price increases and as market conditions improve for us. At about that time, we will then have the opportunity to start looking at our expansion, where we can expand Etango from an initial 3.5 million pounds- 6.7 million pounds. If, as I expect and many of the people on this call expect, we're in quite a different triple-digit uranium market by then, we will be able to capture all of that value through contracting and locking in minimum returns in respect of that expansion. It presents as a very attractive opportunity to lock in minimum returns as well as exposure to increasing uranium price activity over the next 5 to 10 to 15, even 20 years of the project. Those initial contracts were a very important start to that. I wouldn't want investors to get too distracted by trying to impute an overall incentivization philosophy on us because of what we were prepared to do for only 5% or 6% of our production. To stay on the topic of off-take agreements and the market before we head into a couple of other topics, have you heard anything on current floors and ceilings? Are they being what's been discussed in the current market? Are we actively responding to RFPs that are out there? More broadly on that, are we seeing RFPs come into the market at the moment? First of all, on floors and ceilings, there isn't a lot of data points on floors and ceilings. For anyone out there who is reading market commentary, I just want to put a warning out there for you to better interpret what you're reading. I'm seeing floors being thrown around as the market conditions. However, when we see those numbers and we try and understand where the commentators are deriving those numbers from, they are not numbers or they are not floors that are being contracted. They're floors where utilities are saying we're prepared to offer a floor at that. In most cases, the producers are coming back and saying, sorry, that doesn't work for us. As we would all know from trading shares and the buy-sell spread, if someone says they're prepared to buy a share for that, that does not mean that that is the market price. A little bit of caution on some of the lower numbers that are being cited as being floors over the last six months in this sector. In terms of our market activity, yes, we're active in the market at the moment. In most cases, we're not successful because we're sticking to our guns and we're being very disciplined about the producer opportunity that's reflected in the price of our uranium. We're receiving and engaging with a very pleasing amount of utility interest in our project at the moment. As we said in the quarterly, the fact that we've now announced our initial contracts and they've been through the rigor of tier one utility due diligence has increased the interest that we're getting from various utilities and other market participants around the world. Great, thanks, Brandon. This was announced a couple of quarters ago, but the spot units, the holdings that we've got, can you just share a little bit in regards to the strategic thinking around that for those that aren't up to speed on that transaction? Yeah, I'd love to actually, because this gives you an insight into the level of sophistication that we approach this market with. We described that spot holding when we first acquired those units as synthetic exposure to physical uranium. In other words, we sized that holding to be the equivalent of 100,000 pounds of physical uranium. Now, there's two ways that we could try and own 100,000 pounds of physical uranium. We could open a converter account, we could buy 100,000 pounds, and we could store it there. There's a lot of drag. There's a lot of friction associated with owning physical uranium, particularly for such a small amount. It's not particularly liquid. You can't just go and sell 15,000 pounds because you would rather be holding 85,000 pounds rather than 100,000 pounds. You can obtain synthetic exposure in the way that we have with the Sprott Physical Uranium Trust. For our purposes, we believe that that is the superior physical exposure and superior synthetic exposure for our requirements. Now, what does that do for us? Having synthetic exposure to 100,000 pounds becomes a very useful mechanism or a useful tool when we are getting close to production and when we are deciding how to market and sell and liquidate the non-committed or non-contracted portion of our production. In this sector, you don't go and contract 100% of your planned production because that can make you vulnerable. It means if there's a delay, you've got financial obligations. In many cases, we'd be looking to de-bottleneck our process and perhaps even do better than our expected production. There's also quite a bit of flex from one quarter to another, as we've seen with one of our peers releasing a quarterly report just with the delivery timing and sales timing. You need to maintain a fair bit of flexibility. By having 100,000 pounds of synthetic exposure, that gives us a hedge so that we can be trading 100,000 pound lots of uranium, even if we haven't yet put it on a ship, knowing that we can then get optimal pricing on that. It's a big topic. I could probably spend a webinar explaining the mechanics behind that. It's not some punt that we've made. It will be a good investment. We're confident of that. It has been already, but that wasn't the intention behind it. We don't accept money from investors and then try and do a better job reinvesting it than that. This is an investment into a unit, into a series of units that provide an enabler for our marketing activities later down the track. The whole time, it's highly liquid, unlike holding 100,000 pounds of uranium, as I said. It enhances our flexibility if we ever need to draw on that source of available cash. Great. Probably a quick one here, Brandon. Still expecting to ship the first yellowcake 2028-2029, and how's the timeline on that? The timeline's fine for now, but as I've said many, many times, this is not a deadline that we are putting on ourselves at this point. The flexibility as we approach FID is very important to us, and it's very important to our capacity to optimize the improvement in the market itself. When we get to FID, we will republish a timeline, and then we're very happy to be held accountable to that timeline. In the meantime, it's indicative. It's indicative of what's achievable. Whether that's in the best interest of the project and best interests of shareholders will really depend on how this market and the terms and conditions and pricing in this market continue to develop ahead of our FID. Right. Now, I'm conscious of time and aware that some of you may need to jump off. We will spend another five minutes or so just trying to get through most of these questions. Brandon, can you comment or talk on the Defense Protection Act, the consortium that's happening in October? I mean, we're seeing a lot of news out of the U.S. at the moment on critical minerals and rare earths are having their day. Is that going to flow over to uranium? What are your thoughts around what we're seeing over there in the U.S. at the moment? Yeah, I think if I try and keep this one high level because there are just so many announcements coming out, including overnight, as highlighted from that question. What that illustrates is the value and potency of the series of four executive orders that the Trump administration released a couple of months back. One of the overlooked but very, very significant aspects of that integrated suite of orders was that the White House has basically given full permitting jurisdiction to the Department of Energy and the Department of Defense if they want to or choose to develop reactors on their own land. An example of where that has been very important for developing both conventional and SMR reactors is the plans that Fermi America have to develop data centers on Department of Defense land at the Pentax military nuclear facility. Because that's geared for military nuclear requirements, as you can well imagine, the risks and the safety are an order of magnitude greater than what's required for civilian nuclear applications. They will be able to meet the requirements there very, very quickly and years ahead of if you were permitting a new civilian nuclear power station where there wasn't already one. Many examples of that are coming out of these executive orders, including that announcement last night about the Department of Defense wanting to roll out dozens of micro reactors both inside the U.S. and to military bases around the world. The final point that I'd make is one of the factors that's dragged on the nuclear sector and the development of nuclear technology over the last few decades, but in particular since Fukushima, has been availability of capital. That's not a feature when it comes to military spending by the U.S. Last time I looked, the U.S. military budget was AUD 978 [billion]. Powering that defense machine is strategically vital. It's very, very important. Carving out a proportion of that AUD 978 [billion] should not be a difficult ask, given the importance and the value that nuclear power can add to powering bases. Just to be clear, we're not talking about weaponry here. We're talking about providing the infrastructure to power conventional defense and military facilities. Thanks, Brandon. We have a couple of questions here on the royalties in Namibia. Obviously, we've had a few comments in the media around 51% ownership from the Namibian government. We have our mining license at Etango, but can you just comment on where that sits in country and what that could mean for us, if anything? Yeah, so there's been a fair bit of speculation. In the media, it's been drawn directly from comments made by the Ministry of Industry, Mines, and Energy. However, those comments are not a statement of government policy. It's more like a statement of his opinion as to what he believes should be the future policy settings in the country. At 51%, it's obviously drawn a lot of controversy, including from politicians of his own party in Namibia and, of course, the opposition. I think it's well accepted in Africa that large amounts of government ownership just don't work. Now, putting all of that to one side, the one consistent thread throughout all of this speculation and all of this sort of thought bubble exploration of this debate is that existing licenses are sacrosanct. There has never been a suggestion that existing licenses would be subjected to these types of ownership provisions. We feel entirely comfortable that it won't affect Etango, given that we have a mining license already issued. The discussion now with government is, is there a need for greater Namibian participation in the mining sector, given that there's a good balance between the royalty rate at 3.25%, the corporate tax rate at 37.5%, and the expectation on return that investors need to receive for that risk? If there was to be a change, the Chamber of Mines has been very assertive with government in saying, if you're going to tinker or change or adjust, it needs to be licenses that are granted into the future, as in exploration licenses, so that anyone putting risk capital into the exploration sector knows what the new rules of the game are. That's an ongoing discussion. It's been had all the way at the top with the president. I'll be in Namibia in two weeks' time to further some of those discussions, not on behalf of Bannerman because we're comfortable, but on behalf of the Namibian mining sector. I'm not losing any sleep over this issue at the moment. One final point, we're in an election year in Namibia. We've had a federal election with the new government coming in in March. There's regional and municipal elections. For anyone who's dealt in Africa, and you can say the same thing even in Australia, election years produce a lot of publicity and profile-grabbing debate, and I would put this in that category. Great. Any M&A discussions in Namibia? I see these conversations on Twitter a lot of the Bannerman and the, you know, the John Buchans and all of us coming together. Any thoughts on that, Brandon? I think everyone on the call would realize that whilst it's great fun to read everyone's theories on X or social media, no company executive is going to comment on an M&A activity. What I can say and what I'm quite happy to say is our strategy is very focused at the moment on delivering Etango, initially delivering the financing and FID for Etango, and then ensuring that the transition into construction is undertaken with an appropriate focus on execution risk. We certainly don't want to see ourselves getting distracted. I'll leave all of the armchair investment bankers to continue with their theories on X. Great. Brandon, I'm going to call the last question here. There seems to be a big discrepancy between the spot price of what the U.S. utilities are expecting of $75.80 in the 2030s versus the producers who are saying $110- $150. What's your comments on that? Look, I don't know if there's a data point that says what utilities are expecting. I've got a few guesses on what utilities are hoping that prices will do, which is not run away like crazy from where they are now. Bear in mind that utilities or utility fuel buyers are very sophisticated, very clever, very experienced industry professionals. They're not going to wander around a conference saying, "I've been chewing my nails down because I think uranium's going to $150 a pound." Of course, they're going to be telling anyone that'll listen that this market's going to grow in a very orderly way. What I can tell you from the mining perspective is that this market is not incentivizing enough supply for the current nuclear fleet, let alone the anticipated demand across any scenario that you choose. When you look at the World Nuclear Association's recent fuel report, even under the low-case scenario, under the most pessimistic scenario that that conservative project is able to project, there is a growth in uranium demand out to 2040 that will more than double the—let me put in different figures. That growth is more than 100,000 pounds per annum out to 2040 in the context where supply will drop by about 100,000 pounds in the absence of new projects. A vast gap is opening up that can be addressed, but it needs some very strong market incentivization. That predominantly comes in the form of market signals and price signals. Utilities who do the work themselves or who are open to understanding that data point, whilst they need to maintain a particular poker face in the way that they're playing, I'm finding that increasingly they realize that that is a very plausible risk that they're going to need to manage in their businesses. Great. Thanks, Brandon. I'm just conscious of time. There are a couple of questions there that we will get in touch with you, I think, personally, unless you've got any quick answers to those, Brandon. I think that we'll reach out to those people directly. I'm just conscious of time here today. Thank you, everyone, for joining us. Up on our YouTube channel, there is the latest construction video where you can see all the progress from this quarter. If you do have any questions at any point, please feel free to reach out to me, and I can come back to you on those answers. Great. Thank you very much, Emma, for hosting and coordinating another, I hope, informative webinar. Thank you very much to all of our shareholders and potential investors who joined us today in your ongoing support. We look forward to continuing to deliver, as we've said that we would. Next quarter, I'm expecting to again be able to tell you that we're on time, on budget with the early works activities. Great. Thanks, Brandon.