An exciting time for the company, with a background of successfully having developed gas assets in the Perth Basin previously. She has made a massive impact on Strike already, and in the couple of months that she has been there, she has been able to achieve a huge amount. I believe the company is in great hands as we transition to the next stage for the company. I will turn to Shelley in a moment to take us through the company update. Before I turn over to Shelley, the announcement yesterday on West Erregulla signifies a major milestone for Strike and a turning point to realize the value from our largest asset. It has been a culmination of a huge effort by everyone in the Strike team, and while we still have some further work to do to finalize the documentation, I am very pleased with the result that has been achieved. Through the deal negotiated with Hancock Energy and the revised Macquarie loan terms, we will bring West Erregulla to market without needing to raise additional funds for this project. With Walyering increasing production, South Erregulla Power Plant coming online, in perhaps the best market conditions that we could expect for the peaker, and with West Erregulla producing in 2029, Strike is positioning to not only have three cash-producing assets, but also the significant portfolio for exploration that we have with the Ocean Hill tenements and the Kadathinni tenements. With that, ladies and gentlemen, I will pass over to Shelley, and then at the end of Shelley's presentation, we will have time to answer some questions. Thank you, Shelley, and welcome. Thanks, Nev. Hello, everyone. I am delighted to be here today as the CEO and MD of Strike. I have had a great start here at Strike, and coming to Strike, the idea of this role was very appealing to me due to my background in the Perth Basin, as Nev mentioned, and my understanding of the assets and just also understanding what the opportunity is here at Strike. I am very keen to continue to have my sleeves rolled up and get things done. Without further ado, we will get into the presentation and start talking about the West Erregulla announcement yesterday. Several months ago, when I stepped in, I made a connection with Hancock, and we started to work quite closely on our agreements and where we were, and certainly the team has done a huge amount of work in getting to the point where we are today. Today, we have really strong alignment with Hancock within the joint venture, which is fantastic. It just bodes well for having alignment and being able to work together as we work towards our full form documents. In the agreements we have with Hancock, we have binding heads of agreement, which we refer to as the implementation agreement. Within that, we have a fixed and agreed and binding capacity charge, which is the amount we get charged to put the gas through the facility. On top of that, we have also announced some funding that we have. Hancock have given us access to a loan to fund our pre-FID component of the program. I will talk a little bit more about that in detail. The part about that that is important is that it is not repayable until first gas. It helps us to remain funded as we get through to full FID and first gas. We also have the AUD 30 million Macquarie facility, which is great. Macquarie, this was an existing tranche we had that we were able to work with Macquarie to have access to that. That was previously going to be the CP was around FID. Because we have made such great inroads with Hancock and we have the binding heads of agreement, we were able to access that funding. It just helps us to remain funded across this time for Strike. The other thing, of course, is that with the W.A. gas market, you may be aware that there is a supply shortage coming 2029, 2030 in W.A., and it perfectly positions us to put our West Erregulla gas into the market at a strong pricing point. Here is a little slide just summarizing West Erregulla. Many of you will be familiar with these stats, but we have 251 petajoules of gas for sales over the project life. The term of the agreement with Hancock over West Erregulla is for 12 years, but that can be extended depending on availability of gas. We certainly have, there is still remaining upside across L25 and L26, and they are the two production licenses that cover West Erregulla and also Erregulla Deep, which sort of has not been factored in here. Of course, we are funded with pre-FID. The pre-FID activities include drilling West Erregulla 6, and the Strike team have currently been on site for the last week or so installing the conductor on the West Erregulla well. Certainly there are certain activities that we are taking forward at the moment under our pre-FID work program. The other parts are going to be the drilling of West Erregulla 6, and workovers on three other wells. Our pre-FID activities are West Erregulla 6 drilling and three workovers and testing of three other wells. There are some activities that will be undertaken now, and then we will be actually getting into the long-form documents with Hancock on the gas processing agreement, the coordination agreement, and the gas lifting agreement. The reason we are going to work through those documents and get them executed prior to the more material pre-FID activities is so that we have security of our gas getting to market through Belisama before we start spending money on pre-FID activities. It is a very structured and sensible approach for us to work with Hancock to get the documents in place that we need to actually reach FID. At that point, we will then start putting money into the ground up at West Erregulla 6 in particular. We have good access to rigs, and everything is sort of waiting. Our plan is to get the GPSA done, and the other documents done by around the end of this year, although we have a backstop date further in 2027, and then we will start to look at those pre-FID activities. This is a slide just talking about the W.A. gas market, and you can see that the demand is the yellow line there, and the supply, existing supply and committed supply, and West Erregulla sits in the light blue section here of the AEMO chart. You can see there's a significant shortfall coming in. That's where we see ourselves coming online in early to mid-2029 with our West Erregulla gas and being able to optimize our returns on our gas marketing strategy. This is just a little slide to talk about the leadership changes. I came in as CEO and MD on the 1st of June, and we also had the refresh board with Nev now being the chair of the board. We now have four directors on the board. We have Nev, we have Jill Hoffmann, Stephen Bizzell, and Will Barker, and myself. I suppose the board is working really well. A smaller board suits the size and scale of the company really well, and we've certainly been able to get on with things as a team really well. The other thing, of course, that we will talk about today is about the other projects that we have. We have on top of West Erregulla, we also have the Walyering production ongoing at the Walyering facility. We have the South Erregulla Power Station, which is in the commissioning phase now, and I'll talk a little bit more about that as well. When you think about us going forward as a business, over the next several years, we're going to have those three streams of revenue. We're going to have the Walyering gas production, we're going to have South Erregulla capacity credits, which are not insignificant, and revenue from electricity sales, and we're also going to have West Erregulla coming online. That's a step change for this company and having those multiple revenue streams, which will help to fund us going forward and into the future. It's a very exciting and transitional time for Strike. We just have to be very structured and disciplined in putting the blocks in place to get all of that to be foundationally correct before we move forward. That disciplined approach is something that I will deliver for shareholders in making sure that we bring things on time, in line with expectations, and managed effectively. If we talk about Walyering is a great little plant that was built in 2023. We continue to produce gas from that facility, and we have just recently successfully installed compression at the site. That will help us to increase production. We have the ongoing contract with Santos, and we're able to deliver. What we're targeting is 20+ TJs a day as we bring compression online. We also have, of course, we recently announced the Walyering West discovery, which we're just going through a FEED process at the moment. Assuming that all goes well, we'll be looking to bring that online, which will bring us additional production, which does not require compression at that stage. It'll give us a chance to bring on a bit more gas. We're looking forward to bringing Walyering West online as the field continues to naturally decline. The other thing that's worth noting about Walyering is that this plant is actually designed to be able to be moved. I see there's potential opportunity with some of our other tenements having discoveries and being able to, in the future, when we've finished production at Walyering, to be able to use this plant elsewhere. It's just an important thing to note. The South Erregulla Peaking Plant. Certainly this has been an incredible project delivered by the team. It's not something that Strike had done before, but it's been an exceptional job to date. I've been up to the facility, and it's just a fantastic facility. I've managed a number of power stations in my past with the likes of Mineral Resources, but this is certainly a very good plant that's been built really well. You can see in the background of that photo the top where the wellhead is. You've got the well there so close to the power station, which means that the inputs of energy, the gas going into the power station, the cost is very low. It allows us to come into the electricity market at different pricing points and still to be able to create good returns for Strike. Where we are with Western Power at the moment is, they took control of the power station on the 21st of July, and we are in their commissioning process at the moment. There are two parallel work streams for South Erregulla. There is the physical commissioning piece, which is around the plant and also the switchyards. Then additional to that is the dynamic modeling piece, which is where we're actually simulate bringing the power station onto the SWIS. Western Power will bring a model of our power station that we've provided into their SWIS network and run it under different scenarios and testings. Then there's an iterative process where we gradually get the power station to be able to run without exception on the network. Certainly to date, we brought the power station physically online against a load bank to actually test all the compressors, everything. Everything is running really well, all the engines are running well. It's just that physical commissioning, I think is fairly straightforward, and we're looking to get that done fairly proficiently. Then it's just the dynamic modeling piece. Working with both Western Power and AEMO, I recently set up a steering committee to actually really try and drive that process. At the moment, we're thinking there's likely to be a bit of a delay, so we wanted to let shareholders know as soon as we could that there's likely to be a delay on delivery of that project. But it certainly doesn't indicate that there's any issue with the power station. It's just the process that we have to work through with Western Power and AEMO. This is actually the first reciprocating engine power station that's been introduced to the SWIS, so that's a new thing. Certainly, it's a very positive thing because Western Power see the advantages in having that flex of a peaking gas-fired power station on the network. But once again, it is new, so it's taking a little bit longer to get that properly embedded into the SWIS. We've got 85 MW up there of integrated peaking power. It's our low-cost gas that's actually running the power station. We're in the final phase of commissioning, and we certainly have an outlook for strong electricity pricing as we go forward. The capacity credits, we know how much we're going to be earning in credits two years in advance. We already know what we'll be achieving next year, the year after, and then there's a forecast for the following year, and they are continuing to increase each year. That certainly underpins the investment for us and makes a very strong case for the power station. At the moment, we're still working around what it's going to look like, a revenue model for us on the other side with the power station. But the next slide, we'll go into a little bit more detail on that. But there's certainly that increasing support for supporting renewable generation on the SWIS and a peaking gas-fired power station is the perfect balance with bringing on wind and so on. If we talk about the market, there's a couple of slides here. The top one is just the reference trading price, an example day. You can see that the price fluctuates during the day. What Strike will be endeavoring to do, the peaking part of our power station is actually to be capturing those peaks of high demand and high revenue here, and perhaps that's when the wind's not blowing, for example. The wind farms are not coming on, and we're sitting in that sweet spot there. But we can determine ourselves how many hours a day we want to run the power station, depending on pricing and so on. It keeps us very flexible, and we flick in and out with 15-minute segments on the market. It's a very reactive and live market that we're working in, and we have the systems in place to actually manage all of that. And we have a very strong team in-house that are very adept at managing the marketing side of all of this. I'm very pleased with that. And the prices are impacted by the fact that coal is exiting the market. We've got increasing load from potential customers and just that increasing need of that flex that SEPP provides is really important. I think we're in a very good place with SEPP. We'll know more once we get online, and we get up and running, and we can see how we come in and out of the market. We'll have a much better understanding of what the revenue generation looks like, but we're certainly very happy with where we're sitting at the moment and what we see going forward. This is just a slide just to talk a little bit about the optionality we have around the power station. Actually one of the questions online, which I'll get to you later, was around whether we can use West Erregulla gas at South Erregulla, and yes, we do have the optionality of that within the contract, the agreement with Hancock. That is certainly a possibility. Because you can see how close West Erregulla is to South Erregulla. And what you can see on this slide is the yellow line is just the outline of our land that we hold up there, and that actually has the potential for over 300 MW of wind. If you can think about it, you can see the 132 kV line that we have actually tied into. What this says is the Midwest is a fantastic area for both wind and solar, as you can imagine. With the gas peaking power station sitting in there to pick up the gaps and also with batteries on the system, you can see how this is a really good opportunity for potentially someone to come in and have a look at this land for different opportunities, such as data centers or others. We certainly are open for business on what we might be able to achieve with this parcel of land that we have, particularly with the high generation of wind that we can see. We have been actually modeling the wind for several years now so that we have a really good store of data on what that particular parcel of land can deliver. This is just a little bit of summary of where we are today as a business. As I said, we have Walyering online delivering back to 20 TJ a day over the next week or so. That is excellent for us at Walyering. With Walyering West coming online, there is the additional optionality of that well being able to come online and backstop as the rest of the field declines, which is fantastic. With South Erregulla, we have the capacity revenue. For year one, it is around AUD 19 million or AUD 20 million, and for year two, it is in the late AUD 20 million, AUD 30 million. That AUD 52 million represents what the first two years of revenue will look like for us from capacity. Once we come online with South Erregulla, there is no penalty for us coming on late. As soon as we come online, the capacity credits start getting paid weekly, and so we will receive that weekly capacity credit just for being available. Even if we do not put electricity into the market in a particular week, we still receive the capacity credit. It really underpins that power station for us, and the reason that we built it, really. We have that solid foundation of capacity credits, and on top of that, the electricity sales, which we are looking at an average peaking price last year of AUD 120/MWh. As you saw on those charts, that trend is increasing. West Erregulla, it is our biggest project. We just need to bring it online. Like I said, we are working very methodically with Hancock to get all the agreements done. We will be letting you all know as soon as that happens, and that will lock in commencement of our firm pre-FID activities to get us forward to that point in FID, which will be exciting. Pre-FID, I have talked about, which is West Erregulla 6 and the well workovers. Post-FID and pre-first gas, as a joint venture, we will drill one more well, and that will get us to first gas. An important point is that Strike will remain operator until we reach FID, and as part of that process with Hancock, we will also be locking in work program and budget for the coming years in the field development plan. Even though we are handing over operatorship to Hancock, we retain 50% of that field. Under the JOA, the joint operating agreement, we have equal rights to Hancock on all matters. We are not giving that away. We retain that strength within the joint venture and also the additional controls to be able to work with Hancock to develop a field development plan and work program and budget that is fit for purpose for us as well as for Hancock. That is a very important distinction on that project. Then I guess we move on to the additional upside that we have. You all know we have Ocean Hill and Kadathinni. For the past however many years, we have been focused on, our capital has been going out on SEPP and other things. We have not really been doing as much exploration and drilling as we would like as a business. Going forward, once we start generating revenue from South Erregulla, we have the additional revenue from Walyering, and we have more certainty around West Erregulla. Certainly, that shores us up for how we are going to go forward with our exploration program. We have some seismic planned and in budget for South Erregulla up at the power station for the future well required up there. We also have seismic for Kadathinni. Kadathinni is the next, for me, an exciting opportunity because it is a Permian play, similar to Lockyer and West Erregulla. There is huge opportunity there. We are going to be planning that very carefully to be sure that we explore that in the right way to get the outcomes that we are looking for. Then, of course, Ocean Hill is a fairly well-known entity. Ocean Hill is also their cheaper wells, and so the dry hole cost for Ocean Hill is less than half what it is at Kadathinni. Certainly, we will be looking ahead. We are working on the approvals for the Ocean Hill well, and also on the rest of the approvals and land access agreements and so on for the seismic, which is all going very well. I think as we go forward, what we need to get back to as a company is creating value via the drill bit. I know a lot of people came into Strike with that exploration, that was the excitement about Strike, and we have been incredibly successful in drilling great targets within the company in the past. We look to move forward again. Of course, with our acreage, we own 100% of all of our acreage apart from the West Erregulla joint venture. That gives us also enormous flexibility about how we manage the financing of the future exploration program, because there is a lot of interest in these projects from other parties as well. If we decide we want to go down the joint venture path or whether we want to fully fund them ourselves, that will come as we move forward and understand the process better and understand those projects better. This is just a little bit more deep diving, a little bit more detail on those projects. Ocean Hill, L26 is the near field upside for West Erregulla. That is Erregulla Deep and that L26 production license, which is to the east of the main West Erregulla project. Kadathinni, like I said, that is the Permian play. There is a lot of interest in this, in particular in Kadathinni, and it is just fantastic that we have 100% of Ocean Hill and Kadathinni, as well as our other tenure as well, because 3,000 sq km in the Perth Basin is a pretty enviable position to have as an operator, particularly with 100% ownership. Why Strike? Why now? I think we are on the pathway. Like I said, a structured approach will get us across the line with all of this. We are going to be disciplined with our cash management, with how we roll out projects. We are going to be doing what we say we will do. It is very important to me that we actually deliver what we say we will deliver. West Erregulla unlocked, which is a fantastic start. Yes, we still need to get to full form documents, but we have a very aligned joint venture partner on that. They obviously want to get West Erregulla across the line because it supports development of the Belisama facility. We then have our multiple revenue streams coming online over time, which is Walyering, South Erregulla, and West Erregulla. We have that diversified exposure, which is fantastic. We have the gas sales, but we also have electricity sales, and so that is a really important distinction from others in the basin that we are very unique that way. We have our funding secured for the time being, so certainly, we are funded through for the next good while. We have West Erregulla well covered with the multiple opportunity. We have strong support from our bank, Macquarie, with additional facilities available there as and if required. We have the support from Hancock on West Erregulla pre-FID on very favorable terms. We are well covered for all of that. That gives us the opportunity to get out there and really think about what comes next. But for us, it is key is delivering South Erregulla, so that is an absolute focus of mine right now. Getting those West Erregulla documents completed, absolute focus of mine right now. We have the right teams in place to deliver those work streams. Certainly, the teams have done an outstanding job, and they will continue to do so. Then we start looking to our growth opportunities as a business, and like I said, value from the drill bit. I did it and saw it at Lockyer. Norwest going from a AUD 12 million market cap to a AUD 500 million market cap based on the back of the Lockyer discovery. We want to find one of those, right? That is what we are going to be trying to do. At the moment, I think we see ourselves as undervalued. We have a lot of work to do, but we have the right team in place to deliver really strong outcomes, and I just want to say that I value all of your support as we move forward into this next phase for Strike Energy. Thank you. Nev, are there any comments you would like to add? I did not give you much of a chance to speak. I was on a bit of a roll. No, that's great, Shelley. Well done. I think the other point that I'd make is that in making the decision on the pathway to market for West Erregulla, we did look at all options and all alternatives. We negotiated the different deals there to a point where we could make a decision of which was in the best interest for Strike, the best interest financially, time-wise, alignment-wise. We've got a tremendous working relationship with Hancock Energy, and we're working very constructively with them. I think Shelley's been a key part of that, building that relationship and rebuilding that relationship. I know there's been some concern about the way that we might partner with that and the handover operatorship, but I'm very comfortable that we've got great alignment. We've got a joint venture partner that's very motivated to bring West Erregulla to market, and I'm very comfortable with the transfer of operatorship at FID so that we get that efficiency and alignment right through the production chain. Thanks, Nev. What I'll do now is I'll start going through some of the questions that were asked on InvestorHub. Just bear with me while I pull them up. The first question I'll answer is around West Erregulla economics evaluation. The question is, "Today's announcement materially de-risks West Erregulla, but what information can you provide to help shareholders and analysts quantify the value of the project?" What I'll say first is that the capacity charge that was negotiated with Hancock is confidential and will remain so. However, there's enough public data for a back of the envelope toll range, and the analysts will be working through that. Certainly they'll be thinking about the facility CapEx, the capacity Strike share, and the infrastructure return and term. That will all come through the market, through analysts and so on over time, but there's certainly enough information out there for that to be worked through. West Erregulla operatorship is the second question. "Why is Strike transitioning operatorship of West Erregulla to Hancock— Sorry. —and has Strike been adequately compensated? Sorry, Shelley. Sorry to interrupt. Just on the West Erregulla one, I think to Shelley's point, if you back calculate from the AUD 850 million, we have got a share of that plant with our effectively 15 PJs a year through that plant. You can back calculate that, add a couple of AUD onto that for operating, lifting costs and OpEx and decommissioning costs and export pipelines and all those sorts of things. The gas price right at the moment is probably in the AUD 8.50 range in the market. We are expecting that to go higher in the future, but somewhere around about that now. If you take our 15 PJs per annum at that sort of margin, this project will be somewhere in the AUD 60 million-AUD 80 million worth of cash generation per year, is the sort of rough ballpark of where it will be. You can apply whatever multiple you think is appropriate for that and get a value. Our view is the value of West Erregulla is going to continue to increase. We have not had to commit any gas on a pre-sales agreement. We have all of the gas available to market, and we are in the position where we have funded the project without needing to pre-sell that gas, which just puts us in a very strong position. Sorry, Shelley. All good, Nev. Why is Strike transitioning operatorship to Hancock, and have we been adequately compensated? What I will say, and I mentioned earlier, was that Strike importantly remains operator for pre-FID part of the project. Like I said, we have ongoing upstream-downstream alignment with Hancock. What we felt was that it is actually the right way to go forward is to have that integrated approach to around the wellheads and how we manage the wells in alignment with the requirements of the plant. Having one operator across the plant and the wells makes a lot of sense. Because we have the right agreements, key fundamental terms in place to be able to manage our own interest in this, we are very comfortable to hand that operatorship to Hancock once we have met those milestones. Like I said, by actually being able to define the field development plan, the work program and budget, by having our agreements in place to get to that facility, I think that's a very important step for us. Then working through the pre-FID piece, we remain in control. At the right time, when we know we're going ahead, we hand over to Hancock, who can then get busy with connecting their wellheads to the plant, and we're away. I think for us it was a very good agreement. It's good the commercial terms were assessed as a package, and this is really the best way to take forward Strike's interest and Strike shareholders' interest, was to have that integrated operatorship approach. Like I said, with the joint operating agreement that we have in place, our interests are protected as a partner. Hancock has access to a much larger pool of resources, people, and everything to sort of bring that project forward. We're fine with handing over operatorship at that point. Does the Hancock arrangement make Strike harder to acquire? There's really no change in Strike ownership with this deal, and there's no impediment to change of control. The arrangement simply de-risks West Erregulla and enhances Strike's value. Any future proposal would still be assessed on its merits and considered in the interest of shareholders. Really, this has no impact on that whatsoever. Nev referred to, just before, the opportunity for us to maximize returns around gas sales and so on. With the CSBP, the next question, sorry, is the CSBP gas sales agreement, and how that's impacted by all of this. The sunset date in that agreement is June 30, 2027, and the conditions of that are unlikely to be met with our current timetable. Because we're going to be doing all of our long-form documents prior to pre-FID activities, we'll be reaching FID in FY 2028, which is still going to meet the timeline for first gas with Belisama, because that's all happening in parallel. This CSBP contract will fall away. We still are very keen to find customers for our gas, and CSBP are an important potential customer for us. We will continue to engage with them and others in the market as we go forward. What we will be doing is maintaining our flexibility and looking to that gas shortage coming in 2029-2030. As Nev said, the prices are looking like in the AUD 8-AUD 10, and we want to be maximizing our return. We have, at the moment, full flexibility. We don't need a contract in place for us to reach FID. I'm not saying that we won't have one, but I'm just saying that because we're funded, it's not something that we have to rely on. We have strength and flexibility in the market. The next question is around the South Erregulla delay. Can you explain what's causing the delay at South Erregulla and whether Strike has the right expertise in place to complete the work? I'll reiterate, the team has done an outstanding job to date. It's a major project, and in a major project, delays are not unusual. We have fully tested the engines, and they've been commissioned on gas. The plant itself is immaculate and in perfect running order. The critical path we are on at the moment is with the transmission, Western Power, AEMO testing and approvals, and as I said, that dynamic modeling piece. There are multiple parties involved, and there is specialist expertise we have engaged. We have a company that is actually working between us, Western Power, and AEMO to actually help deliver this. They work with all of the providers such as the Jenbacher, because we need a lot of input from Jenbacher on how the engines run and so on. We are working through all of that, but we have full confidence in the team, and we will get this project. Believe me, we are going to get this online as soon as we can. We have a very strong relationship now with Western Power and AEMO. It is just a matter of going through the right process, because what we do not want to do is bring the plant online, or what Western Power does not want is to bring it online, and then it does not fit the network. It will come online, it will be fully ready to go, and we will be off to the races. South Erregulla revenue beyond capacity payments is the next question. Beyond capacity payments, what visibility does Strike have on energy market or tolling revenues from South Erregulla? As I mentioned earlier, the capacity credits are the foundation of our revenue. That is fantastic, and we receive them on a weekly basis once we are up and running. Regardless of whether we put one megawatt of power into the system, you have to be available to receive capacity credits. I have talked a little bit about the market upside and where we see prices going. Certainly, we see higher capacity prices and a lot of volatility in the market. That is where that need for flexible generation comes into play. For us, that is exactly what we designed SEPP for. We have confidence in what the revenue is going to provide us, but cannot comment on that until we actually get up and running, fully commissioned, establish the performance, and actually then access the market. We are looking forward to bringing it online and bringing some revenue in from SEPP. The next question is around exploration priorities, and there is also about Walyering East. Where will Strike focus its exploration program over the next 24 months? Could that include Walyering East? Is there sufficient market demand if Strike is successful in finding substantially more gas? I will answer the last bit first. Certainly, you saw the charts. There is a supply shortfall coming 2029-2030. There is absolutely more demand for gas, more demand than supply. There is certainly a market if we are successful in finding more gas at perhaps Kadathinni and Ocean Hill. Those two projects remain our key focus at the moment, and we have got the seismic coming for Kadathinni, as I mentioned. At South Erregulla and Ocean Hill, we are working on our drilling approvals. We will keep you updated as we progress with those projects. Also, we have got the rest of the permits that we are continuing to work on and build those up into potential opportunities for Strike. Walyering East still remains an option, so we have got that sitting on the side. We're currently focused on spending the dollars on planning for Walyering West because that's closer to infrastructure. Once we assess that and bring that online, then we still have Walyering East sitting there if and when we need it. WA still needs more gas, so I suppose it's just continuing. As we go forward, of course, with this exploration program, I've talked about the disciplined approach we have to delivery of projects, and that is also discipline around our capital management. As we go forward, we assess our revenue streams from SEPP and Walyering combined. We keep a strong handle on costs right across the business, and that will give us that opportunity to get cracking on our exploration program. The next question is: What guarantees will Strike have that a certain amount of Strike's gas will actually be processed each day through the Belisama facility? This is completely dealt with in the key principles we already have in place in our implementation agreement with key principles. The implementation agreement has foundational key principles that we spent the last couple of years reaching agreement on. We actually do have an agreed contractual quantity of 43.5 TJ a day, and we are always able to access our share of that facility processing. The next question is: Can you please clarify the West Erregulla FID project details? As far as I'm aware, it relates to upstream works. However, it appears that the funding that is now being secured to undertake the majority of upstream works and the processing agreement is pretty much in FID. That clarification around pre-FID and post-FID, I think I explained that in the presentation. Pre-FID is West Erregulla 6 and the workovers, and then there'll be post an FID decision. There'll be one additional well getting us through to first gas. Our funding, we have the funding in place to cover the majority of this work and also additional capacity with Macquarie. The next question's a repeat. When is further exploration planned at Ocean Hill and Kadathinni? The last question I have today is: Is all of Strike Energy's share of gas from West Erregulla uncontracted or does CSBP still have an option? As I said, I'll reiterate that Wesfarmers is a valuable partner for us. We'll be working with them, but the contract we currently have in place falls away in June next year, and it's highly likely that FID on West Erregulla, predominantly due to approvals actually, will fall in FY 2028. The current option agreement falls away and we will be out speaking to Wesfarmers and others who would like to purchase our gas at the right price. With that supply pinch coming in 2029, 2030, I think we're absolutely bringing it on at the right time and in the right place. I'm looking forward to that opportunity. That's the answers to all the questions. Nev, do you have anything to add there? I'll just quickly check that no others have popped up while I've been online. Yeah, I think there's a couple of others in the chat, Shelley, you might want to have a look at. But, no, I think, you've covered all that really well. I guess just to reiterate, while we do have the long form documents to complete, the agreements that have been signed with Hancock Energy for West Erregulla are binding agreements, so all of the key terms are covered. And between the Macquarie Group facility and the Hancock Energy facility, we've got the funding covered as well for the West Erregulla project. So that's a very significant component of being able to monetize that asset and generate the cash that we need. The second point I'd make is that I think the peaking power station is coming onto the market at almost the perfect time, because the market need is right there now. We've seen some very high prices for battery charging and when wind generation is not operating. And I think our power station is very much needed on the network at the moment. So we are working very closely with Western Power and AEMO to get that online as soon as we can. As Shelley said, we've completed all the works that we need to do, and we're working with them now to complete that. I think with a long, hot summer coming, they're very keen to get it online as well. Certainly, the additional capacity will be greatly appreciated by those that particularly that live in the Midwest. I think the other questions we've answered there to do with funding and pre-FID, FID. So I think that's covered all the questions. If there's nothing else, I'll say thank you to everyone who's joined the webinar today. I've appreciated this opportunity. I'm looking forward to meeting more of you over time. And certainly, if you have any additional questions, please do, or if you feel that your question wasn't answered adequately, please send me an email and I'll get the answer for you. And we'll make sure that we reply. So thanks again for joining us. Over to you, Nev, for closing remarks. Yeah. Thanks very much, Shelley. Great presentation, and thanks everyone for joining us today. Really appreciate your time. I really appreciate the ongoing support of our shareholders. I know it's been a long journey to get West Erregulla into the market, because we've had the delays in trying to find the best processing option for the gas. I believe that this is a fantastic option for us and will be the fastest route to generating cash flow from the asset and allow us to continue growing the company and creating value for shareholders. So thank you very much. Just to reiterate Shelley's point, if there are further questions, please reach out and ask and we'll get the answers for those back to you. Thanks very much and have a great day. Thank you.