Thank you for standing by, and welcome to the Woodside Energy Group Limited investor call. All participants are in a listen-only mode. There will be a presentation followed by a question-and-answer session. If you wish to ask a question, you'll need to press the star key followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. I would now like to hand the conference over to Ms. Meg O'Neill, CEO and Managing Director. Please go ahead. Welcome, everyone, to this call. I would like to begin by acknowledging the First Nations people of the various lands on which we live and work, and pay my respects to their elders past, present, and emerging. Today, I'm joined on the call by Shiva McMahon, our Executive Vice President for International Operations. We are very pleased to be here today, having achieved first oil from the Sangomar Field, offshore Senegal. This is a momentous occasion for Woodside, our joint venture partner PETROSEN, the government, and the people of Senegal. Please note the standard disclaimer on slide 2, advising that, among other things, this presentation does include some forward-looking statements and that our reported numbers are all in U.S. dollars unless otherwise indicated. Slide 3. Let me begin with a brief overview of our business. As you saw in our Q1 2024 report, the business is in great shape. We have been making significant progress on our three major growth projects: Sangomar, Scarborough, and Trion. For Scarborough, we have completed the sale of a 10% interest in the project to LNG Japan and entered into an agreement with JERA for the sale of a further 15.1%. We recently signed a loan agreement with the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, or JBIC for short, to fund the Scarborough Energy project. Collectively, these agreements build on our long relationships in Japan and reinforce the strategic importance of Australian LNG to Japan. Additionally, in February 2024, we signed a long-term LNG offtake contract with KOGAS, further demonstrating the market demand for our key product. The Trion project continues to progress engineering, procurement, and contracting activities, and we look forward to first steel cut for the offshore platform later this year. Today, we are here to talk about Sangomar. The achievement of first oil at Sangomar is a key milestone and represents delivery against our strategy. We are providing products that help meet the world's demand for energy. The crude quality of Sangomar is similar to grades such as Oman and Johan Sverdrup. We expect the crude to be mainly processed by refineries in Europe and Asia. And we're seeing solid demand for our product in the market and have already sold our first two cargoes, both of which are expected to go to Europe. Now, to recap the development, the Sangomar Field Development phase I features the FPSO Léopold Sédar Senghor, named after the first president of Senegal. The FPSO is located approximately 100 km offshore Senegal. Production capacity is approximately 100,000 barrels of oil per day, and the vessel is moored above the field in a water depth of approximately 800 m. The development for phase I has 11 producers, 10 water injectors, and two gas injectors, which are all subsea wells. The RSSD joint venture has also approved a 24th well. We are very pleased with the drilling progress and have achieved well results in line with expectations. Over 80% of phase I production comes from the S500 reservoirs. These are high-quality, continuous reservoirs. Phase I also includes a pilot of the upper S400 reservoirs. These reservoirs are more complex but contain large amounts of oil in place. The focus of the pilot is de-risking communication between the injectors and producers in the S400 reservoirs. This development plays well to our deep-water capabilities. The pipelay alone was identified as one of the most challenging real pipelay scopes undertaken by our contractor. This complex operation required an upgrade of the pipelay vessel to enable the lay of the pipeline with multiple heavy subsea structures. While we saw some challenges during construction related to execution activities in China during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic, the decision to complete construction and remediation work in Singapore has proven to be the right decision. We have been very pleased with what we have seen in country while commissioning the facility. We are proud of the relationships we have built with PETROSEN, our contractors, and the government. The Sangomar development has already delivered benefits to Senegal. Overall, the project, including our contractors, employed more than 4,400 Senegalese people and has spent approximately $177 million with local suppliers. We will continue to work closely with our contractors to build local capability for the operations phase. I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate the recently elected President Faye. We look forward to continuing to work with the government of Senegal. The new government has been appointed, and Shiva was recently in country where she had a positive meeting with the Minister of Energy, Petroleum, and Mines, Minister Diop. Going to slide five, the fiscal framework in Senegal is different from our main operating areas in Australia and the Gulf of Mexico. In Senegal, we have a production-sharing contract. At the highest level, 75% of revenue can be used to recover costs, including operating expenditure, capital expenditure from the execution phase, capital expenditure that predates the FID decision, and fees that are paid to the government. The remaining revenue is split with a government share of 15%-20% at our expected production rates. Corporate income tax is 33%, and there is a 10% branch income tax applied to income after income tax. Additionally, there are minor levies and payments. Going to slide 6 and back to our strategy, delivering Sangomar is a key milestone for Woodside. We took final investment decisions on Sangomar and Scarborough at a time when many companies were scaling back, 2023 was our peak CapEx year, and with Sangomar first oil, we will begin to realize the benefits of these decisions. Achieving first oil from Sangomar will be the start of cash generation from these major capital projects, with Scarborough targeting first LNG cargo in 2026 and Trion targeting first oil in 2028. I appreciate your interest in the Sangomar development and am proud we are delivering on our strategy. With that, I would like to open up to any questions you may have and appreciate if we would keep the questions focused on the Sangomar development. Thank you. If you wish to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. If you wish to cancel your request, please press star two. If you're on a speakerphone, please pick up the handset to ask your question. Your first question comes from Mark Wiseman from Macquarie. Please go ahead. Oh, good day, Meg and team. Congratulations. Huge milestone today. I just wanted to ask around crude pricing. There were reports that you'd sold a couple of cargoes for delivery in July. Could you just confirm? My understanding is the medium viscosity, medium sulfur crude. Should we be thinking about this being priced relative to Dubai or Brent? And do you have any comment on the pricing outcomes that you've achieved so far? Thanks. Yeah. T hanks for the question, Mark. Look, I'd flag that the grades that the Sangomar crude is quite similar to are Oman and Johan Sverdrup. So I'm sure you can find the analogs and the data for that. I guess to be specific, from an API perspective, it's 31 API and about 1% sulfur. And on the pricing, are you able to confirm the two cargoes that you've sold, what they were benchmarked to? I'll confirm that we've sold two cargoes, but I'm sure you would appreciate that any time you're bringing a new product to market, the refiners want to have a fair amount of data. We've provided assays and samples to the refiners that we've been meeting with to give them confidence and a better understanding of the quality of the crude. But as I said, Oman and Johan Sverdrup are probably the best benchmarks for you. Okay, great. Thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from Tom Allen from UBS. Please go ahead. Morning, Meg. Congratulations to you and the team on the first oil milestone. Given the geology of Sangomar, it's believed to be relatively complex. Can you please share an estimated well performance range or productivity index that Woodside's expecting from the first phase producing wells that are targeting the lower risk, deeper S500 sands? Yeah, thanks, Tom. I know there's a lot of interest in the well performance, and so maybe it's good to set the stage a little bit for how the wells have come in. For those of you who know me well, you know I'm an engineer. I'm a reservoir engineer, a reformed one, so I watch this very closely. I get the daily drilling reports, and I've seen the log data from every well we've drilled. And really pleased to report that the reservoir quality has been very, very close to our pre-drill prediction. So the S500, this is the lower sands, very high-quality, highly continuous reservoir. This is the sweet spot that we're targeting with the phase I development. We've seen the high-quality reservoir sands that we were expecting, and we've been drilling very long horizontal wells, so something like 1,500-meter horizontal wells. The geosteering technology we're using enables us to place the well very precisely and understand offset from things like gas cap and water contact. So the drilling performance has really been outstanding, and reservoir is coming in right on prediction. The S400, as I said in the opening remarks, is an areally extensive, large reservoir, geologically more complex. The permeability is a bit lower, but again, we've been really successful in geosteering those wells and being able to penetrate the targets exactly as we had expected. Now, from a well capacity perspective, in the S500s, we're seeing capacities up to 20,000 barrels a day, and the first well that we're flowing has been flowing at 20,000 barrels a day for our target first oil period of 72 hours. So really pleased with the deliverability. The caution I'll give you, Tom, though, is you can't take that number and multiply it by 12 for all of our producers because of the subsea architecture that we have. So we have a fairly complex subsea architecture with two flow loops, one to the north of the field, one to the south of the field, and we will be co-mingling the production wells into those flow loops. So we do expect over the course of the rest of the year to be ramping up towards nameplate capacity as we bring those wells online in a stepwise manner, but the individual well capacity in the 500s particularly is very strong. Thanks, Meg. Are you able to share a P50 range for what you think your producing wells might flow at peak oil? Look, I'd be averse to doing that, Tom, because we'll be facility or flow line constrained. So as we've said, nameplate is 100,000 barrels a day. That's at the facility. There is a fairly delicate balancing operation to get the two flow line loops balanced well. We need to get water injection and gas injection up and running. And as we optimize the field, we'll be opening chokes on certain wells and choking back other wells. But from an overall headline performance perspective, we do expect to be meeting our production range outlook that we had already communicated to markets with this result. Okay, great. Thanks for the call, Meg. Thanks, Tom. Thank you. Your next question comes from Adam Martin from E&P Financial. Please go ahead. Yeah, morning, Meg and Shiva. Maybe there's obviously been some market concern around sort of the incoming president talking about adjusting fiscal terms. Maybe you could address that. Maybe a good opportunity for Shiva given a recent visit there as well. But perhaps you could discuss that, please. Sure. You go ahead, Shiva. Thanks, Meg. Yes, as Meg mentioned, I visited Senegal the week before last, and as you know, many of the government officials have now been appointed, so we've started to hold introductory meetings with them. And I had the opportunity to meet with the Minister of Energy, Petroleum and Mines, Minister Diop, and it was basically to provide an update on the progress that we've made on Sangomar and also to reiterate our commitment and the fact that Woodside is really looking forward to working with the government of Senegal going forward. It was a very good meeting. It was a very positive meeting, and Minister Diop also reiterated and reinforced the importance of respecting contractual obligations by all parties. I know there have been different rumors in the market, but the reality is, and our experience has shown, that the most successful jurisdictions are those that have been working together with the industry, respecting contract sanctity, and those that create a stable investment environment. We also conduct our business with integrity and work well and support governments that hold the same values. So we know that the Senegalese government is committed to these principles as well. We appreciated the president's recent comments, welcoming private partnerships and reinforcing the state's commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting investor rights. So overall, I would say it was a very positive visit and a very positive start to our relationship with the new government. Okay, thank you. And then this second question, just on the pilot program in the S400 reservoir, I think there's about 270 million barrels of 2C contingent oil and gas in those upper zones. Can you just talk through what your objectives are, when we might learn the outcomes of that, etc.? Sure. So the key question, Adam, in the S400s is the ability for water to sweep from the injection wells to the production wells. And some of the complexity is we see in the seismic data that there are what we call geo bodies, so smaller geologic bodies. And we believe that there should be communication along the lengths of these bodies. We were very successful in placing the wells and, as I said, drilling through the different geo bodies that we have targeted. But the key is to get that dynamic data. So that dynamic data will start to come in towards the back end of this year. We'll need to have a bit of time to understand how the reservoir is performing, update our models. I'd say it'll take 12-24 months to really understand what's happening in the S400s and what that means for future phases of development. Okay, thank you. Thanks, Adam. Thank you. Your next question comes from Gordon Ramsay from RBC. Please go ahead. I just want to congratulate Woodside for bringing this project on stream. It's been a long time coming and sounds like a very good start. I'm just going to follow up from Adam's questions. I'm really interested in the S400, and I guess you've said back end of this year, 12-24 months, you'll have a better understanding. Would that enable you to commit to a phase II for the S400, which my understanding is has a significant volume of oil in place, and it'd be nice to recover as much of that as you can. So will these four wells enable you to potentially move to a second phase or will you need more drilling to do that? Thanks, Gordon, and appreciate the congratulations. I know you're also a subsurface person, so hopefully you appreciated the additional detail there. You're spot on that the S400s is where there is significant in place oil potential. Just to clarify, we have four injector-producer pairs, so we'll get a reasonable amount of dynamic data in this first phase of development, and that data will inform what future phases look like. Now, bear in mind, of course, we'll have the data. We'll be updating our reservoir models. Between the decision points and execute, it will take a bit of time. We'll have to do more feed work, but we have designed the facility to enable that expansion potential. So we'll certainly be keeping you and the market updated as we get that data and as we mature our thinking on phase II. And just one other one from me, Meg. Thank you. Just on the nameplate, I think I asked you about Trion before. When you talk about 100,000 barrels of oil per day, you did mention water and gas injection up and running. Does the facility have capacity, obviously, for total liquids to be much higher than that? In other words, could we sustain that circa 100,000 barrels a day of oil production for longer with the addition of the water and gas, or is the 100,000 barrels a day the actual fluid limit on the FPSO? So 100,000 barrels a day is the oil limit. The total liquid handling is bigger. I don't have that number at hand right now, but we can have the team follow up with you. But that is the oil peak rate. So that's what we would expect would be the peak. And it's probably worth reminding all of you who are building models that it's appropriate to consider a certain amount of downtime, particularly with new facilities as we get the equipment up and running. Excellent. Thank you very much. Really appreciate it. Thanks, Gordon. Thank you. Your next question comes from Henry Meyer from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Morning, Meg and Shiva. Congratulations and thanks for the updates. I'm hoping, if we can, to try and expand a little bit on the ramp-up profile, please. I guess we've been spoiled with a bit of information in the past from the BHP acquisition. In that report, we had a low-case peak average annualized rate around 65,000 barrels, best case getting towards 75,000. Is it fair to assume that this informational forecast is still the best estimate, or have you received any more information that might mean you could sustain plateau rates for longer? Well, look, that's the independent expert report, so that's a few years old. That probably would have been based on the FID plan and would have been early drilling results. Look, let us get back to you on that particular question, Henry. I'd say that, again, the well results have come in very close to expectation. Reservoir quality looks good. The well placement has been fantastic, but it is a complex facility, especially with the subsea architecture to operationalize, and we'll need to go through and check the assumptions that were used in that independent expert report. Got it. Thanks, Meg. And maybe if we can expand a little bit more on the S400s. Obviously, considering the recovery factors on the S400s is incredibly low, and you've more or less completed drilling now, has there been any more encouraging static data, thickness or otherwise, that could support a bit more positivity or encouragement in going for a phase II development or potentially a larger resource size? Look, the resource size, there's no dispute that that is large. What we've seen in the development wells is permeability that's at the upper end of what we had anticipated pre-drill. So we were thinking it'd be 50-100 [mD], and what we've been seeing through the bit is 100-150, so modestly better. What has been really positive is our ability to geosteer and to see those geo bodies through the bit and with the tools that we're using. So I think our ability to image the reservoir is really strong. But again, the key piece of data that we don't have yet is the connectivity between injector and producer. So we'll be looking to get that as quickly as we can because that really is the critical data that will help us understand how much of the in place we can recover. Great. Thanks, Meg. Thanks, Henry. Thank you. Once again, if you wish to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. Your next question comes from Nik Burns from Jarden. Please go ahead. Hi, yes, thanks, Meg and Shiva. And again, congratulations on bringing this asset online. A couple of questions from me. I'm just trying to reconcile your comments that drilling results were broadly in line with pre-drill expectations and the joint venture approving an additional producing well. Can you just explain why there's a need for an additional producer if the results look to be broadly in line? Thanks. In many ways, it was opportunistic, Nick. So as we've been drilling and updating our seismic modeling, we saw what appeared to be a high-quality target in the S500s that was potentially going to be undrained with the initial depletion plan. While we had the rig in the field and a spare subsea tree available, we took the decision to go ahead and drill it. It's far more cost-efficient to do that work now rather than to bring the rig back at a future date. So in many ways, it was opportunistic. We saw a part of the reservoir that was not going to be depleted, and we wanted to place that additional well and give us a little bit more production capacity. Got it. You may partly answer my second question. I was just asking about post-startup CapEx excluding any spend on phase II. Just wondering, should we expect there'll be a requirement to bring the rig back at a future stage two drill additional wells on the S500 sand, or should we expect all 2P reserves to be classified as developed after the current drilling program is completed? Thanks. Okay, there was a couple of elements to that question, so let me go to it sequentially. In terms of the scope of work that we took FID on, the capital investment is nearly complete. We have two wells remaining to complete the final section of drilling. So both wells are, I'll call it, half-drilled. We have to drill out into the reservoir section, run the completion. So we're down to our final two wells, and that work should be wrapped up within the next few months, and that'll conclude the bulk of the phase I capital spend. If we see opportunities to drill other wells, we will continue to look at those opportunities. But again, to mobilize a rig from afar has a certain amount of cost associated with it, so we'd want to be looking at a campaign, which would potentially be a phase II. The reason I paused, Nik, on your question because you raised the term 2P. I think it's worth noting for the audience that between the time that we took FID to now, we have moved to reporting our proved reserves and our probable reserves in line with the SEC's methodologies. And so an outcome of that is that some of the reserves we expect to capture from water injection have been reclassified as contingent. So I wanted to flag that with you because it is a technical detail, but it is one that is important. And as we get water injection online and get confidence in that water injection performance, we will be migrating reserves from contingent to probable and all the way to 1P in a stepwise manner. Right. Thanks for that. So just to clarify, how much 2P reserves was reclassified as a result of excluding water injection impact? Look, I'll point you to 2 pieces of data. So when we took FID, we indicated we were targeting about 230 million barrels to be recovered. It's ± still in that ballpark, but the 1P booking has been updated following the merger, and that was in our 2022 year-end report. Sorry, half-year 2022 report. Got it. Thanks, Meg. Thanks, Nik. Thank you. Your next question comes from Rob Koh from Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Good morning, and let me join everyone in congratulating you on getting to first oil. Just, I guess, more of a modeling question. I'm just looking at slide 5, the tax slide, and I mustn't have had my coffee this morning. Is it possible to just confirm, is the project likely to be cash tax paying in its first year, and is there kind of a rule of thumb for effective tax rate that we could use to calibrate? So yes, and yes. So I said it in the remarks, corporate income tax is 33%, and I think it's on the slide as well, a nd then there's a branch profit tax. But if you look at how the modeling flows, so revenue comes in, so $100, $75 of those dollars goes to the cost oil pool, $25 goes to profit oil that gets split between ourselves and the government, and then there's income tax applied to that. So that's notionally how it flows through, but if you want to kind of interrogate that in more detail, Marcello or Sarah from the Perth team can give you a call. Yeah. Thank you. Yeah, we probably will. And when I say we, I kind of mean Sarah. And then I guess the subsidiary question to this is there's a pool of losses that will go against that 75% of cost oil. Some of it's got a three-year limit, and some of it's unlimited. Are you able to give us any steer on, say, what percentage of the total loss carry forward has the three-year limit? No, I don't have that at hand. Yeah. No worries. Okay. Yeah. Follow up with the first team. Yeah. W ill do. Thank you so much. All right. Thanks, Rob. Thank you. Your next question, it comes from Saul Kavonic from MST. Please go ahead. Hi, Meg. Two questions. I guess there has been kind of some rumors or concerns circulating in the market about this project. Can you confirm if there's any audit that has been underway or is underway, and if there's any downside risks associated with any audit? Well, look, thanks for the question, Saul. Look, every government around the world audits the books. They audit taxes, audit PSCs. We have audits underway in pretty much every jurisdiction we operate in. That's standard practice. And look, we have absolute confidence that the costs that we have booked were appropriately booked and were appropriate costs to develop the asset. So yes, we're continuing to talk to the tax authorities in Senegal just like we do in Australia and the U.S. Right. I might ask just perhaps more generally then, with all the information you now have on Sangomar to date, is there any indication that it could result in any changes to the outlook you've put out for production or free cash flow over the next few years, or is that all everything with Sangomar is consistent with that outlook? Yeah, everything's consistent with the outlook, Saul. Great. Thank you very much, Meg. That's all from me. Yeah, that's it. Okay. All right. I think that was the last question. Look, probably worth just going back to some high-level points. The reservoir and drilling results have been really very close to pre-drill. I'm very pleased with how the team has characterized the reservoir and how we've managed to execute that program. Really pleased with how the FPSO is performing. As I said in the opening remarks, the pit stop in Singapore was invaluable to ensure that when the FPSO arrived in Senegal, it would be ready to hook up, commission, and get up and running. So very pleased with how the asset is performing. And we look forward to Sangomar generating value for Woodside and our shareholders for many years to come. Appreciate everyone joining us today. In terms of some upcoming events, our Q2 2024 report will be released on the 23rd of July, and our half-year report for 2024 on the 27th of August. So I look forward to speaking to everyone again in August, and thank you for your interest today. Thank you. That does conclude our conference for today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.