Welcome, everyone, joining us today for the Melexis Third Quarter 2025 earnings call. I am Philip Ludwig, Investor Relations Director, and I'm joined by today's speakers, CEO Marc Biron and CFO Karen van Griensven. We will start with brief remarks on the business and financials before taking your questions, starting with Marc Biron. Marc, the floor is yours. Thank you, Philip. Hello everyone, and welcome to this earnings call. In the third quarter of 2025, we delivered sales of EUR 215.3 million, landing just above the top end of our guidance. This confirms another quarter of sequential growth and demonstrates that the recovery, while very gradual, continues. The quarter-to-quarter sales growth was driven mainly by Europe, while Asia-Pacific and the Americas were broadly stable. Asia-Pacific continues to be our largest region, with around 60% of the total sales. Within our product portfolio, the sales of our motor drivers were strong during Q3, especially in automotive HVAC applications, as well as in thermal management for EV powertrains. Our pressure sensors also performed well, particularly for internal combustion engines, such as fuel management and after-treatment systems to reduce emissions. We launched an additional three new products during Q3, for a total of nine products since the beginning of the year. This included a new magnetic sensor for small motor applications, such as automotive seats and windows. We have also launched an upgraded sensor measuring current, voltage, and temperature, enabling a more precise measurement in safety-critical applications like automotive batteries and DC fast charging. The third launch was a motor driver for smart fans used for server cooling, which is a very demanded application linked to the AI trend. With a busy Q4 ahead, we remain well on track to approach the record number of product launches achieved in 2024. We have recorded new design wins in the third quarter, including the two largest design wins so far for this year. One of them was for a motor driver, especially designed for the 48 V architecture of EV vehicles. This is a unique product, and we expect strong growth for 48 V architecture, which has many advantages in terms of cost, in terms of electrical power density, not only in EVs, but also in robotics. Overall, we are booking clear progress on our strategy. The number of product launches is on track and will be similar to the record of 2024, with 19 or 20 product launches. We continue to expand our product portfolio with the ambition to address new customer needs in fast-growing applications, driven by the electrification, the premiumization, and the automotive trend. The opportunities outside of automotive are still very strong. For example, in robotics, we have provided our first tactile sensing solution to our customers. Last but not least, we continue to have strong traction in Asia, both in automotive and outside automotive. We will go in more detail on our strategic progress at our Capital Market Day on November 5th. I will now hand it over to our CFO, Karen van Griensven, to provide a detailed financial overview and outlook. Thank you, Marc, and hello, everybody. The sales for the third quarter of 2025 were EUR 215.3 million, a decrease of 13% compared to the same quarter of the previous year, and an increase of 2% compared to the previous quarter. The Euro U.S. Dollar exchange rate evolution had a negative effect of 2% on sales compared to the same quarter of last year, and a negative impact of 1% on sales compared to the previous quarter. The gross result was EUR 83.4 million, or 38.8% of sales, a decrease of 23% compared to the same quarter of last year, and an increase of 1% compared to the previous quarter. R&D expenses were 12.8% of sales, G&A was at 6.1% of sales, and selling was at 2.3% of sales. The operating result was EUR 37.8 million, or 17.6% of sales, a decrease of 41% compared to the same quarter of last year, and an increase of 6% compared to the previous quarter. The net result was EUR 27.5 million, EUR 0.68 per share, a decrease of 46% compared to EUR 51.2 million, or EUR 1.27 per share in the third quarter of 2024, and a decrease of 27% compared to the previous quarter. Moving to the outlook, Melexis expects sales in the fourth quarter of 2025 to be in the range of EUR 215-EUR 220 million. For the full year 2025, Melexis expects sales to be in the range of EUR 840-EUR 845 million, with a gross profit margin around 39% and an operating margin around 16%, all taking into account a Euro U.S. Dollar exchange rate of 1.17 for the remainder of the year. For the full year 2025, Melexis now expects CapEx to be around €35 million, previously around €40 million. This concludes our remarks. We can now take your questions. Operator, please go ahead. Thank you, Marc and Karen. Just, Philip, again, to reiterate, please ask one question with one follow-up at a time, and if you have more questions, you can rejoin the queue. Operator, can you please give the instructions? Ladies and gentlemen, good morning. If you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial pound key six on your telephone keypad. The first question comes from Francois-Xavier Bouvignies from UBS Investment Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Hi. Thank you very much. My first question maybe is on your top line. If I understand correctly, if you look at peers, visibility is still fairly low. Can you provide a bit more color on what you see, as much as you can, into the start of 2026? I mean, do you see, in line with seasonality, a good proxy at this stage, or do you think the recovery can continue and you can have an above-seasonal trend into early 2026? Thank you for the question. As we have already mentioned in the previous quarter, and as you mentioned, indeed, the visibility is quite limited. We receive pretty a lot of quarter order, even order within the quarter. For all these reasons, indeed, the visibility is not, is less than in the past, I would say. We are also now in the middle of the annual price negotiation with our customers. In those annual price negotiations, there is also the forecast discussion. I think it's really too early. For all these reasons, it's too early to give a helpful view on 2026 and even early 2026. Got it. Thank you. Maybe on the gross margin side, I mean, I can see your inventories on your balance sheet are all-time high. I was wondering, how should we think about the gross margin directionally? I mean, from here, because it seems that you keep your loading quite high, so you still produce a lot of inventories. Should we expect the gross margin to flatten from here as it recovers? You have to sell inventories first, and the loading not increasing much. It seems that your inventories are quite high. I was wondering how you want to manage it and what's the impact on the gross margin? Yeah. The gross margin, as we mentioned before, it has quite some effects that are, I mean, amongst other, the Euro U.S. Dollar, which is specific for 2025 and which will probably, I mean, if the Dollar is stable, will have limited impact next year. That could have a positive effect moving forward. The same is true for cost of yield. Cost of yield today, also in Q3, was still quite high. We expect, as from Q4, that we will see gradual improvement of the cost of yield, so also of the gross margin. Expectations are that over the next quarters, we will see a gradual improvement of the gross margin despite that inventories are so high. Does that answer your question? Sorry, Karen. Sorry, Karen. Yeah, but the cost of yield, what do you mean by that? I mean, you mean the loading or? Why would your yield be below usual right now? It's higher than usual now, and it will go back to the more usual amount. The yield is quite a waste we have. I understand that. It has to do with the. Why is it more? Go ahead. Why is it? More than usual? It has to do with the ramp-up challenges. Yeah. That's already for more than a year. It has to do with ramp-up issues that we had in one of the fabs, and because it's a new process, new technology, it often comes with ramp-up issues. These ramp-up issues have been solved. That's why we will now expect better gross margins due to that effect. How much is this drag? How much? Yeah, it has an impact, a negative impact, of at least 2% today. Thank you. I appreciate it. We'll go back to the queue. Thank you. All right. The next question comes from Ruben Devos from Kepler Cheuvreux. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Good morning. I had a question regarding the design win for the motor driver on the 48 V EV architecture. I was curious, what's the step up in Melexis content versus the 12 V baseline? When do you expect sort of sales to be visible here? The 48 V architecture is a kind of modern, let's say, new architecture that has been developed by some OEM. OEM specialize on the EV car. The advantage of this 48 V architecture is that you can provide power without consuming too much current, and the goal is to reduce the current consumption of battery to keep the range high, but having more power in order to move some equipment that need power. This 48 V architecture is more and more used by the OEM. As a consequence for the IC manufacturer, you need to develop specific IC that can, let's say, withstand this 48 V. Yeah. At Melexis, we have started to develop this product some years ago, a bit in advance because we are close to the customer. It's, as I mentioned, a unique product on the market. We have received our first design win in Q3 for such application directly from an OEM. To answer your question, what will be the outlook? Yeah. It really depends on the speed of the adoption of those 48 V architecture. Now we have in the making more and more products that are compatible with this architecture. Okay. Thank you. Second question regards China EV market specifically. I think you've had a series of quarters where performance was better than in the other regions. I think now also in Q3 it was down but still better than, for instance, North America. Just wondering around the latest ordering behavior, I'd say, is there any change in tone from China specifically? The divergence between Chinese OEMs and what the Western platforms are doing? Indeed, Q3 was a bit lower, but we see already that in Q4, the orders from China are back to, let's say, previous level. There was indeed a small dip in Q3. Is it linked to inventory collection? I don't know. I'm just assuming. I don't know exactly what is the root cause, but in Q4, it's back to the regular trend, let's say. Okay. Any visibility on early 2026, or it's too soon to say anything about that? Too soon indeed. As I answered before, it's too soon. Okay. All right. Thank you. In general, I would say the funnel of opportunity and the design win are still very strong in China. If we take the top 10 of our design win in Q3, 6 out of the 10 are coming from China. It's just to show that China is still very strong. Okay. Helpful context. Thank you. The next question comes from Marc Hesselink from ING. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thanks. My first question is actually on the testing you're currently doing with the Chinese foundry. I think you're intending to start the production there at the beginning of next year. I just want to know any update that you can see, also maybe related to that yield, if you have already some early indications how that's going. Yeah, small correction. We intend to start the production during summer next year. You mentioned early next year. I would like that it's early next year, but you are a bit too optimistic. It will be summer. Yeah, it's for a current sensor that we have developed specifically for this market. We have now the first wafers, and the development has been done. The design has been done. We have received the first wafers two weeks ago from the fab. Yeah, we are now in the process to evaluate the product. It's too early to give any indication. Yeah, the chip exists. The chip is working. We are now busy to evaluate the performance. Great, thanks. My second question is on cost, both OpEx and CapEx. Pretty good cost control over the quarter, both lower than expected, also lowering the CapEx guidance for the full year. Can you maybe explain a bit what's behind it? Is this a reaction on maybe a bit longer gross margin pressure, or is it simply you don't need to do those investments at this stage? Just, why it's moving? What did you exactly do to have this good cost control and what do you expect going forward? Yeah. The cost control, given the uncertainties today, we are just putting control on our costs to make sure they don't increase in the current environment. Also, over the next quarters, we want to continue that behavior. On the CapEx, it has to do with the product mix. There are many elements that are at play. The product mix has an impact on the CapEx we need. In general, we see that the pickup is rather slow. We have an increase quarter on quarter, but it is very slow today. That for sure also has an impact on the current CapEx visibility. Perhaps to complement, Karen, we could say that indeed we pay attention to the CapEx, but for all the innovation aspect, all the development aspect, we don't reduce at all the CapEx. We are still to speed development. Correct. Okay. Clear. Thank you. The next question comes from Janardan Menon from Jefferies LLC. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi. I just want to ask a question on the non-automotive side. You seem to be doing quite a lot in terms of drivers, the fan coolers, robotics, etc. on that side. The proportion between automotive and non-automotive has been roughly flat, at about 88/12 for some time now. When you look at 2026, do you see a possibility where your non-automotive will start growing faster than your automotive? Is that something you can say at this point based on your design wins, etc.? In that context, the tactile sensor for the robot, the design win you've got, what kind of, are you shipping something there? When can we expect some volume there? Thanks. Yeah. On the first question, on the overall revenue, let's say, from non-automotive for 2026, I think we need to be patient in the growth of opportunity. In the design win, we really see that the non-automotive is more dynamic. I mean, the increase is steeper in the non-automotive than in automotive. We really see in the funnel much more dynamic for the non-automotive. Now we need time to convert this in real sales. It means I don't anticipate, I would say, in 2026 that it will become very, very visible, even if, yeah, we are working on it. I'd give the example of the funnel of opportunity. Can give also the example of the product launch. We will launch probably 19 products in 2025, and out of the 19/ 9 will be for non-automotive. We are really, the machine is running full speed for the non-automotive product. We should be a bit patient for the conversion. Coming on your second question about, sorry. Yeah, correct. Go ahead. Yeah. Coming on your second question about the tactile sensing solution. We will explain more in detail during the Capital Market Day next week. For the tactile sensing solution, we have decided to not provide only a chip, but we really want to provide what we call the solution, which is more a module. We will give more detail during the Capital Market Day. We have indeed shipped the first module to our customer, and now the customer is evaluating them, not only the chip but really the module. It's a big step for us. Understood. Just a clarification, if I may, that 2% of gross margin improvement from yield improvement, what period will you recognize the full 2% or 200 basis points? It will take a few quarters, but we will probably see already an effect in Q4. It's because we need to go through our inventory before we see the full result. That's why it is gradual. We see it already in our test results. We see that the problem has been solved, let's say. Understood. Thank you. The next question comes from Craig McDowell from JPMorgan Chase & Co. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thank you very much for taking my question. The first one on your auto business. We heard from a large peer that their conversations with OEMs and tier-one suppliers suggest the content growth and mix will be far less positive in 2026 than in prior years. I understand you're going through planning and budgeting and pricing negotiations, but I'd be grateful to hear your perspective on content growth into 2026 and what's showing up in your order books. Thank you. Yeah. I think it's too early to give comments on 2026. We will give an outlook for 2026 early, early 2026. We see that there is a bit of two different dynamics in Europe and in China. The European customer, I would say one year ago, the European customers were very cautious. We see also that the tier-one and the OEM are reducing the headcount, and we see the consequence that they postpone new platforms. They delay the innovation. I think since, this trend has been reduced and we see a new dynamic, let's say, with our European customers. We speak about new platforms, about innovation again, but it's quite moderate. If you compare with China, where in China there is a lot of traction, let's say, for modern cars, modern platforms, a lot of premiumization features in the car. There is a bit of two dynamics, I would say. It's why in our decision, our budget, we want also to make sure we concentrate enough on the China market. Understood. That's very helpful. In terms of content, because your question was about the content, I think long-term, it's clear that the semiconductor content is increasing in the car. It's also clear that this rate of increase depends on the type of application. I do believe that it will increase more in China than in Europe for the reason I mentioned before. Super. Thank you. The next question comes from Robert Sanders from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Good morning. Hi. Two questions, if I may. Firstly, in terms of the OEMs, they've started recommencing R&D on ICE platforms. Is that a good thing for you, given that innovation is coming back to sort of your legacy sockets, or is that a kind of potential risk given that you might lose those sockets? Just interested in what that means for your margins and content in ICE powertrains. The second question would just be in China. Clearly, you've got quite capable competitors like Novosense in China. Given that the China EV market is kind of suffering from very severe excess inventory at the moment, is that a problem for your pricing discussions next year? I would expect that pricing pressure would intensify. Have you seen that so far in your discussions for next year? Thank you. Yeah. The first question is about the combustion engine. At the end, for Melexis, we have the same number of content in a combustion engine and in an electric engine. If the end customer selects an EV or a combustion engine car, in terms of chip content, it's the same for Melexis. What is important for Melexis is that this, if we come back on the combustion engine, the combustion engine is put on a modern platform because in those modern platforms, there are much more comfort features, safety features, and what we call premiumization, meaning that ICE or EV is the same for us. What is important is if the OEM, let's say, reuse their ICE, their ICE engine, it's important they put this on the new platform, which is the case because, okay, now when you buy a new car, you like to have, let's say, enough premiumization features. What we see, what the OEMs are doing in Europe, indeed, they refresh their ICE engine, but they put it in a modern platform. On the pricing version, the question? Sorry. Yes. Sorry. Yeah. On the pricing version, for sure, we like to go to China because there is a lot of, there is a lot of content in the car, but there is also a lot of competition in China. You mentioned Novosense. Yes. It's a very, it's a very serious competitor. Yeah. 2 years-3 years ago, the discussion with the customer was about the number of chips, how many chips can you supply? Yeah. It was the discussion three years ago. Now the price or the cost is also part of the decision. Yes, we have a cost discussion with the customer. It's also why we are working on diversification of our supply chain. It's also why we are working on our internal cost because indeed we need to improve our cost base in order to be able to have market price with good margin in China. Would you say last year, BYD was asking for 10% price cuts from their suppliers. Would you say that's about par for next year, or do you think it's worse because of the margin pressure they're facing? I would say the price expectation from our customer last year, I mean, the price reduction expectation of last year, are similar to this year. Of course, they expect a lot, and then all the negotiation starts, and we are able to reduce those expectations. It's why, a bit as last year, I think, yeah, we expect a price reduction, low, low middle, single digit, as last year, I would say. It's also important because you mentioned BYD, which is a very big customer. Of course, with this kind of customer, we have price reduction. It's important to realize that we have a long, long tail of small customers, and with those small customers, we don't really discuss price. I cannot give, like that, the volume or the revenue taken by the top 20 customers, but yeah. We have a very long tail of smaller customers where we don't discuss price. You mean that those price discussions at corporate level have a lower impact, let's say. Got it. Thank you. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, please dial the pound key five on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Michael Roeg from Banque Degroof Petercam S.A. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Yes. Good morning. I have two follow-up questions on inventories. One of the first analysts indeed mentioned that inventories were at record levels. This is despite the fact that the scrap was above average, low yields, low gross margins. Now, if your gross margin recovers because your yields improve, is there a risk that your inventories will grow even more than they already did in the last year? That's the first question. The second question is, is your entire inventory immediately commercially available, or is part of it stored in dye banks? That's it. I'll follow up also afterwards. Our inventory is indeed at historical high levels, but we do not expect that it will further increase. The yield has limited impact on this, rather the contrary, because it will mean that it goes hand in hand with better lead times as well, meaning that the need for inventory reduces. The second question was about dye banks, I think. Yeah. I think it's indeed the inventory is spread all over the supply chain. We have part of the inventory ready to ship because it's indeed the goal, to be able to react quickly. We keep as small as possible, let's say, the inventory ready to ship. The rest of the inventory is across the supply chain at wafer level, before the assembly, after the assembly. The big part of the inventory is finished. Yes. Okay. Coming back to those inventories, if you have better yields, then more finished product will end up in your inventories. I also heard that cycle times will be shortening. That means even faster ending up to the inventory. That means that you must be selling out faster than today to get your inventories done. No, because we will order new wafers according to the new yield. Indeed, if the yield is 2% higher, as Karen mentioned, we will order 2% less wafers in such a way that we can keep the inventory under control. Okay. That's clear. Another quick follow-up question about China. You mentioned you have a very long tail of smaller customers in presumably automotive in China. There have been a lot of news articles about excess capacity among Chinese car manufacturers and the risks associated with that, and that the government wants normal price behaviors and stuff like that. What is your, yeah, how you say it, counterparty risk with respect to these smaller customers? Do you have debtor insurance? So that suppose that one or more would go bankrupt, that you still get paid. Yeah. What's the situation on that? Yeah. In most cases, we have a distributor in between, so we deal with a distributor. We do not have a debt insurance, but we monitor this very, very closely. In cases where we are not confident in the repayment capacity, we ask for a prepayment as well. This happens quite a lot in China. That's how we monitor the situation there. Would you say that the risk of a smaller end customer lies with your distribution partner, or has it happened that they try to pass part of it onto you as well in a situation like that? The risk is with the distributor. Of course, the risk for us is on the financial stability of our distributor. That's why we monitor that very closely. Okay. Good. That's reassuring. Thank you. There are no more questions at this time. I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing remarks. Thank you, operator. In summary, after nine months in 2025, Melexis continues to see sales trends improving. We continue adding innovative new products to our portfolio, and we concentrate resources towards a faster-growing market. I would like also to highlight the Capital Market Day that we will hold on November 5, next week. Thank you for joining our call, and goodbye. Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect.