Okay. Thanks everybody. Ladies and gentlemen, good afternoon, welcome to the Proximus Q2 2021 conference call. For your information, this conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to turn the call over to Nancy Goossens, Director of Group Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you. Welcome, everyone. Thank you for joining us. We will start this session with an introduction by the CEO, Guillaume Boutin. After this, we will turn to your questions. For the Q&A session, we are joined also by Mark Reid, our new CFO, so his first Proximus call. Jim Casteele, the Chief of the Consumer Segment. Anne-Sophie Lotgering, the Chief of the Enterprise Segment. The CTO, Geert Standaert. Dirk Lybaert, the Chief Corporate Affairs, and Matteo Gatta, the CEO of BICS. They will be taking your questions in a moment, but first, Guillaume will take you through the highlights of today. Guillaume, please go ahead. Thank you, Nancy. Good afternoon to you all, and good morning to those joining from the U.S. Welcome to this webcast on the Proximus Q2 results. Before getting to the financials, let me take you through the progress we made in our #inspire2022 strategy. As a reminder, we have built our strategy around four pillars. For each of these, we have been making some nice progress over the past three months. Let me zoom in on a number of achievements. We're on track with our fiber plan, with further acceleration of a build during the Q2. The average weekly deployment increased to 7,400 homes and business passed. With this, we've passed almost 90,000 new premises with fiber, and this brings the total home passed to 621,000, just over 10% of all Belgium premises. We are really fast-tracking our fiber rollout, and we are shaping up to go even faster with our partners. Earlier this week, the clearance was given by the European authorities for the creation of the JV in the Walloon part of the country. This JV is called Unifiber and will be deploying fiber for at least 500,000 premises by 2028 in the south of Belgium. Similar to Fiberklaar in the north, Unifiber will be building on an open P2P passive fiber infrastructure. Between our own deployment and the two JVs, we are well on track to realize our ambition to pass a total of 4.2 million premises in Belgium by 2028, meaning a coverage of 70% of the country. With the recent showcase in Antwerp, we underlined the superiority of fiber by activating the first 25G PON network worldwide, a real technological leap forward and a key enabler for the future digital society. I want to stress this, fiber is not only about speed, but also about ultra-low latency stability. There will be a speed element in demonstrating the fiber superiority against other technologies. This will not be the only one. Low latency, stability for video calls and home working, homeschooling, are also key features that cannot be matched by coax networks. Already today, we see that the superiority of fiber starts to materialize with the number of customers signing up for consumer fiber offers, increasing by 14,000 for the Q2 of 2021, that's just a start. Besides fiber, 5G is a key to our business strategy. It's a combination of fiber, 5G, and edge computing that allow us to build a robust, reliable, and energy-efficient gigabit network for the country. 5G opens up a new world of possibilities, especially for business customers. With our new 5G innovation platform, our partners and customers can try and explore the unlimited potential of this technology. For instance, in the agriculture domain, for which a more sustainable weed control was tested successfully thanks to a combination of drones, AI, and 5G. For the consolidation of the mobile network, MWingz has now completed the consolidation of a 1st cluster of mobile antennas with some good results in terms of coverage and speed for our customers. Looking at the services we provide, we see growing traction on our digital apps that are used every day by millions of customers. With Inspire 2022, we want to use this engaged customer base and use the diversification of our service offering as an engine for growth. To that end, we have, for instance, recently launched the Doktr app. Through the Doktr app, anyone can have a direct access to a qualified doctor via the smartphone in a few minutes. We have also made progress on Banx. The bank imagined by Proximus, and that will be powered by our partner, Belfius. With our digital ecosystems, we are preparing the growth of tomorrow. Today, our results come from our successful multi-brand strategy. In the past quarter, we received the green light from the Belgian Competition Authority to acquire Mobile Vikings and their 330,000 customers. Mobile Vikings is nicely complementing our Scarlet and Proximus offers with a focus on the digital and data lovers. They have a strong mobile-only offer in the north today, which means several avenues for upsell and growth. The Mobile Vikings customers will be migrated in a seamless way to our own Proximus network somewhere in the H1 of next year. As of then, we'll be realizing very nice network cost synergies. Our fourth and last pillar of the strategy covers our ambitions on sustainability, and we are making this part of everything we do. In May, we published our sustainable finance framework. We also made good progress on some of the key initiatives that we have launched, such as the recycling of mobile phones. Last, but certainly not least, in view of the recent devastating floods in Belgium, we have taken up the important societal role we play, not only by our critical infrastructure and the connectivity it provides, but also by helping impacted employees and citizens. These recent events underline the relevance of our sustainability ambition as part of our strategy. Let me take you through some of the key financial achievements over the Q2 of 2021. Overall, I'm very pleased with the results that we have achieved in the Q2, and especially our commercial results, which remains a main driver of our top line. We posted growth for all our main customer bases. We increased our TV base by 12,000 subscriptions, our internet customer base by 10,000 new customers, and closed another strong quarter for mobile, growing the postpaid customer base by 48,000 new customers. This commercial success is especially driven by high-value customer growth. For consumer, our growth is, of course, relying on our brands and our proven convergence track record. Specifically, our convergence customer base continues to grow nicely, adding 18,000 customers over the Q2, meaning that we managed to grow this segment of customers characterized by a higher-than-average ARPC. As a result, our convergence revenue grew by 3.3% year-over-year. These trends are supported by the Flex range. Over the Q2, we attracted 442,000 customers to one of the Flex offers, being a mix of new customers and migration of existing customers from legacy offers. The ongoing success proves Flex is really answering changing customer needs. There is less and less appetite for a fixed voice line, which is reflecting the fixed line erosion. There is a growing appetite for multi-mobile and other value-added services. Besides Flex, I explained earlier that fiber is becoming a key selling point for us. End of June, we had a total of 90,000 fiber customers within our consumer segment. We added 14,000 net new fiber customers compared to 5,000 last year. We expect, of course, this trend to further accelerate in the coming months and years. Now, taking a look at the price segment. It's clear from the Q2 results that we're holding up quite well in the B2B market. Overall, the enterprise segment revenue grew by 3.5% from the 2022 level. This was supported by a 2.9% revenue growth from telecom services, and of course, on a low comparable base. The ongoing transformation of our B2B is being well managed, as demonstrated by our growing higher margin ICT service revenues. The recent trends in digital adoption are bringing social opportunities with a particular focus on cloud, security, IoT, and collaboration. In this context, our converged telco ICT solutions and our emerging end-to-end servicing offers are gaining traction. This brings me to the total domestic revenue for the Q2, which was up by 2.4%. When taking out the revenue contribution of Mobile Vikings for the month of June, the revenue was up by 2% on an organic basis. Looking now beyond our domestic operations. For Telesign, the accelerated digital adoption worldwide is bringing great opportunities. For example, cybercrime and digital identity theft is increasingly a major problem. Telesign is bringing the right solutions and benefits from its unique position, being at the intersection between digital identity and secure CPaaS. Telesign sees the number of transactions on its platform growing rapidly, which then feeds back in the platform and improves further the accuracy of risk scores required for fraud management. This success is translating into Telesign's top line. Telesign's revenues continue to show strong growth, up by 22.5% on a constant currency basis. This was driven by both programmable communications and digital identity services. We also recorded strong forward bookings in Q2, which will support a continued double-digit revenue trajectory for the rest of the year. Said before, we are really investing now in the growth trajectory of Telesign. This entails the reinforcements mainly of the go-to-market and the product development. Turning now to BICS, we have a 2.5% revenue growth. BICS is impacted significantly by the low travel volume and with this impact now annualizing. The underlying business trend is becoming more evident. To be clear, the good performance of the quarter is not linked to a back to normal of travel patterns. Some elements need to be highlighted. Revenue from legacy services, so mainly voice, shows further decline, but at a lower pace and with a strong unit margin. For its core services, BICS achieved very nice growth over the Q2, mainly driven by strong performance in messaging, serving both telecom operators but also digital enterprises. In cloud communications and IoT, BICS posted higher revenue and is now recognized in the Gartner Magic Quadrant in both domains. This growth, however, was offset by fraud prevention services, which continues to grow but has been impacted by the loss of a top customer last year. Together with strong cost management, this translated into a 2.6% increase in the BICS EBITDA for the quarter. Moving now to the operating cost of the group. Here, I just want to highlight that the steep year-on-year increase is due to exceptionally low 2020 baseline. Remember that Q2 last year, from a cost perspective, was positively impacted by the COVID-19 restrictions and also included a one-off provision release. These together accounted for nearly EUR 20 million on one-off positives. This aside, our expenses are still increasing slightly because of increased customer interactions. What we mean are costs related to migrating customers to fiber, migration to the new Flex portfolio, technical support of customers working from homes, all customers-related costs. Also, as we announced before, we have some costs related to our ongoing transformation and some cannibalisation effects. At the same time, we continue with our cost efficiency program, which is focusing on other areas, typically on areas not related to customer volumes. This brings me to the EBITDA for the group, totaling for the Q2 EUR 459 million, a decrease from last year by 3.7%. If I exclude the one-offs of last year, the increase of direct margin is partly offset by customer costs linked to our good commercial momentum and Fiber migrations and our investments in the growth of Telesign. With the Fiber project accelerating, we also see the CapEx rising over the H1 of 2021, all according to plan. Fiber is now representing 32% of the total CapEx envelope. Besides Fiber, we also stepped up investments in the area of digitization and IT transformation. We also have some more CapEx coming from the increased customer installations. At the same time, we are rationalizing on CapEx for less strategic areas to manage the overall envelope and put all of our focus on strategic investments. The free cash flow generation remains strong. With a normalized basis over the H1 of this year, a total of EUR 262 million, which is above the normalized free cash flow over the H1 of 2020. In conclusion, we are very pleased with the strategic progress we are making and also with the financial results achieved so far. We are therefore comfortable in confirming our outlook for the year, in spite of some ongoing uncertainty on the speed of recovery from COVID-19 restrictions. With this, I have come to the end of my introduction, and we can now go to your questions. Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you have a question please press four one on your telephone keypad. Your first question from David Vagman from ING. Please go ahead. Yes, sir. Thank you. Good afternoon, everyone, and thanks for taking my question. I've got three. First, on consumer services revenues. How do you analyze the flat performance in customer services in Q2, in particular, in light of the quite strong commercial success of Flex, I think? We see convergence RPC still declining. What are your expectation, especially for H2, and then following the launch of Telenet ONE & ONEup? That's my first question. Secondly on fiber, how can we best model the evolution of the take-up rate of fiber going forward? What are your expectation, and what can you do to accelerate it? Third, on the mobile spectrum auction, how do you assess the political development there? Regarding the reservation of spectrum for a fourth player, what is, according to you, the chances of the draft law being voted as it is? Do you expect negotiation basically between the federal state and the Belgian region to negotiate, let's say, stricter condition? Thank you. Hi, David. This is Jim Casteele talking. On your first question, with multiple sub-questions, I would say first on the consumer service revenue. Indeed, we have a service revenue that is flat YoY. On the one hand, there's multiple elements that drive this. On the one hand, we see indeed convergent revenue growing thanks to, like you said, our Flex solution. With more and more customers subscribing to those convergent offers, we of course see a decline in our fixed and mobile-only customer base, which is to a certain extent offsetting that convergent revenue growth. And also what is important to note is that last year during COVID-19, we saw a temporary increase in traffic on fixed and mobile, which has boosted the RPC in 2020. We no longer observe this today. We actually already see the same trend in July when we look at July versus July last year. These are the three elements that explain why the consumer service revenue is flat, despite the fact that indeed we have a very strong performance on convergence driving our ARPC. That's on your first question. On the convergence ARPC as such, this is actually driven to the fact that it's linked to the change in the mix in the convergent ARPC. Typically, we think it's only about internet, TV, and mobile, but in the convergent ARPC, we have historically also customers that still have fixed voice. With fixed voice declining in our customer base, we have less customers in convergence having fixed voice, and this is driving the ARPC of convergence down. The good news, of course, is that we still have a very good convergent ARPC of EUR 93, which will help us to further boost the average ARPC as we drive convergence in the customer base. I think your last question was on Telenet ONE. There, I think if you look at our commercial results, we are very happy with our performance. Flex continues to deliver very well in the premium segment of the market, which you see in our results on internet, on postpaid, but also on digital TV. We feel that even after three months of launch of Telenet ONE, we still have the right offer in the market. Of course, as always, we continue to monitor this. Of course, S2 is always a very important commercial momentum, and we're really convinced that we have the right offer to continue to have the traction that we see today. Thanks, Jim. On fiber, you have to realize that the acceleration of the rollout of the network is really extreme. Every week we are on an accelerated trend. The build of the network is really going at a very fast track. We are building because we are helping on that rollout. Compared to other geographies or other countries, it's difficult to compare Belgium compared to where other countries sometimes are. That said, if you look at the Q1 in which we have rolled out fiber there, we see a very nice fill rate at par with the ambition we do have, driven by a lot of win backs, a very nice traction of the technology in the areas where we have rolled out fiber, but also boosted by the migration initiative that we do for exiting copper customers. You know that we gave us five years to fully migrate the full copper customer base into the new technology after five years, so that we can remove copper. We give to ourselves five years to do so, and we are on track on the first areas where we have rolled out fiber to get to that copper switch off. That's the second element. Operationally, we are also starting to organize ourselves a little bit differently. We have created a fiber migration squad in the teams of Jim, that is fully dedicated to work on the filling rate of the network. Win backs, but also migration of our copper customers to the new fiber network. Last but not least, you know that we are rolling out a network that is open for others. On the dense areas using VANS, on the less dense areas using a point-to-point passive infrastructure. The network we built is open, and we are convinced that we're going to attract a lot of operators, customers, corporate customers, operator customers to our networks, fiber networks on the medium term. That already is the case. We have a lot of smaller operators that are using our open network today. Of course, at some point, it is going to be probably more massive or larger operators that might be willing to use our network. Again, our topology is fully open. On the dense areas, you can use VANS. On the less dense areas, you can use passive access to the network. On the auction, I think Dirk Lybaert will comment on your question, but we will say the same as our colleagues. You heard Orange Belgium and Telenet, Monday and Thursday. We're going to say exactly the same, but Dirk confirm that to you. Yeah, maybe first on the timing of the auction. The federal government has asked the advice of the Council of State. Normally, this was expected before summer, normally it was expected last week. It didn't came in, what we hear is that this advice will only arrive September, October. Which makes, of course, that the timing is a bit shifting, again, I would say. Now, on your question whether there will still negotiations between the federal and the regional level. Yes, because once that they have the advice of the Council of State, we will have a new meeting of the consultation committee between regional and federal level. What we hear is that indeed, there are some objections from the regions. The Walloon region is focusing on the negative impacts on sustainability and green, because having a fourth operator will increase the consumption of electricity. This is a bit going against the other objectives that the government is putting forward. The Brussels government still has issues with the radiation norms because adding a fourth operator in Brussels, where you have very low radiation norms, even if there is now a political agreement to increase those radiation norms from 6 V per meter to 14.5 V per meter. It remains a low level of radiation compared to what we see in Europe and what the norms are of the World Health Organization. Adding a fourth operator within those restrictive norms hampers, of course, the effective use of mobile networks in Brussels. The last region, the Flemish region, is still looking at the famous Article 52. The discussion whether the current competitive environment in Belgium allows imposing a discriminatory framework for a new operator. That's a bit the discussions which are still ongoing. Thank you very much. Do you expect a compromise on this point, let's say, with stricter conditions for the new entrants? Very difficult to predict, what we hope, and I think all three operators say the same, we are not afraid of competition. Having a fourth operator in Belgium, okay, the auction is open, so we are not afraid that a fourth operator would come in Belgium. In fact, with Cegeka Citymesh, there is already such a fourth operator. What we are against is the discriminatory conditions that such a fourth operator would benefit from. I think we're all for an open auction. Yes, we can have a fourth operator, but not with discriminatory conditions. Thank you very much. You understood that difficult to make a prognostic on that one. I would just want to add that the conditions for a fourth entrance in current market conditions, the business case is really hard to find, probably, and way harder compared to the market condition four years ago. I think it would be probably more difficult for Centro to make a business case out of this license. Thank you both. Thank you. Thank you. Next question from Nicolas Cote-Colisson from HSBC. Please go ahead. Thank you. I've got two questions, starting with fiber and maybe a follow-up on Guillaume's previous answer, because we have seen initiatives from Orange Belgium testing fiber in Brussels. We have Telenet, which is still working on the deal with Fluvius. What's your view on the risks of overlaps eventually? Because that would reduce the business opportunity for an open network platform like yours. That's the first question on fiber. On Telesign, can you help us understanding how the pricing environment is going? Because you're seeing good forward booking, but I was wondering how profitable growth can be. Same on Telesign, product development. Can you tell us a bit more how you can diversify from the, I would say, the commoditized solutions that make the bulk of the business today. Very last, sorry, on Telesign still. Consolidation opportunities. That was something you mentioned back in February when you acquired the minority. I wanted to find out what was your thinking around that. Thank you. Okay. I start with your first question. For the moment, we are really the only operator rolling out fiber. I think, what we have to do is to concentrate on the acceleration of that rollout. As I said several times, there is a great first-mover advantage in fiber, and there is a product superiority that you can see also in Belgium. You can see that in the adoption of the win backs we are doing on the fiber footprint in which we have really a great commercial momentum. First-mover advantage is key to attract customers, being retail customers or wholesale customers. That's one. For the moment, we are really the only one accelerating that rollout. Second, I think we will have some overbuild. I think you have overbuild in every geographies. City centers, probably, they will be overbuilt in fiber, but I think it's good and healthy functioning market. Even if you have overbuild, you can still have a rational and healthy market structure. If you have overbuild in city centers, you still have a rational and healthy market structure. I'm not afraid of overbuild in city centers. That's probably what will happen with Orange in Brussels or with other initiatives for Telenet and Fluvius on the medium term. We don't have to be afraid of overbuild, especially in city centers where there is a rational and a business case to do so. Of course, when you exceed those city centers, then the business case for having several networks is difficult. That's where our strategy to be the first one to roll out is quite important, that's why we want to follow the plan that we have announced now one year ago to roll out 4.2 million of plugs by 2028. Again, here, I think we are all rational players, and I don't see why at some point we should not have other operators joining our network. Again, that network is fully open. Let's see how it goes. There will be some overbuild. There will be probably some partnership agreements on the midterm. There will be white zones or probably we're going to have to organize public-private partnerships in order to finalize the coverage of the country with the gigabit infrastructure. That's the way I see it. Again, we are open network. We are open for partnerships, and that's a message I'm conveying for 18 months now. I think we first need to roll out and then discuss. That's the first point. Second point on Telesign. As I said several times, Telesign is a jewel. It is not only active in messaging. You have to understand that the main product development of Telesign, this is digital identity platform. Telesign is all about scoring your phone ID or your IP address in order to smoothen your authentication process, so that your customer experience is way better. That's why all the big names of the internet are using Telesign as a provider to make sure that the onboarding journey of the customers is the smoothest journey as possible. The investment we do in the product is around the scoring machine of Telesign, sorry. Here it's all about AI, low latency answers to the request of the website that our customers. Improving the score and improving the response rate of the solicitation of the platform. That's really what we are focusing on. Of course you have the output of that score need to be delivered through different channels, WhatsApp, SMSs, voice. That, I have to say, is the less strategical part of the product. That is still representing a big part of today's revenues. The focus and the growth today is driven by the digital identity part, which is with higher margin and more predictive revenue trends. The growth is nice. The growth is, as I said in the slide, you have to expect a 2- 10 year-over-year development of respectively revenues and direct margin for the year, which is quite nice. This is going to be even accelerated. You have to also understand that we are today investing in those new product platforms and go-to-markets. It takes a little bit of time so that the new sales guys and the new product features are fully implemented within the customer base. That's why adding at the same time the transformation effort that we do and those growth rates, I'm really pleased with the performance and we will continue invest in that growth because we are convinced that Telesign will be continuing profitable growth stories for the years to come. I think I touched your first two questions on Telesign. The third one, consolidation opportunities. Honestly, as I said also, we are really focusing on the growth and reinvesting the go-to-market in the product. The new management team is really doing an amazing job for that. Of course, at some point, so we cannot exclude that we might need strategic partnership or strategic collaboration, strategic combination. We will be, of course, open for that. No, focusing now on executing the plan, executing the growth plan and investing for the future growth of the company. Thank you very much. Thank you. Next question from Ulrich Rathe from Jefferies. Please go ahead. I think I have two questions, please. The first one is on ONEup. You commented earlier that you haven't actually seen that much of a competitive impact so far. Telenet did sound a little bit on their quarter that they're going to put more resources into this in the H2, and that they haven't actually put that much resource into it in the quarter. I was just wondering, do you feel there is a potential bun fight coming up there in the H2, in particular in the Q3 in the back-to-school period? Are you quite relaxed into this also into the H2, listening to your competitor talking about it? The second question is on the flood cost. Do you have already some message on that? Would you treat that as a non-recurring item, or would you leave that within EBITDA and the guidance parameter? Thank you. Ulrich, on the first question, this is Jim speaking. First of all, I think if we look at the current performance, as I said, we're really satisfied with our performance both on internet, on TV, and on postpaid. Secondly, I think also it's a question we got last quarter as well when they just launched their offer. If you look at the price positioning of Telenet, of their ONEup, it's mainly a value-based solution that they've put in the market, and they also tried to fill the low end of the market with a EUR 66 internet mobile. Today, we have the advantage that we have several brands that we can put on the market with Scarlet, with Proximus, and of course Mobile Vikings is today only a mobile brand, but it's still a very strong brand that we can use. If you look at the success of Flex, we are really convinced that we have found the right solution to answer the needs of families, where they can really tailor it to their own needs, composing a very nice proposition, adding mobiles depending on the number of people in the household. If you ask me, are we convinced that we have the right solutions to continue to drive the traction that we see in the market today? Yes, we are convinced of that. To the point of Guillaume, we are also continuing to deploy fiber, and we see very nice traction with Flex Fiber as well, and we all know that the back to school and the end of year are really important moments commercially. We are fully geared up on that as well to have the right promotions in the market to continue to attract customers. I'm pretty confident for the next quarters on our results. Ulrich, on the flooding question on costs, first of all, I think Proximus has done a great job supporting the community here in Belgium in coping with that. I think that's a really important point. On the recurring nature of those, obviously, we've got some limited customers without service, which we're supporting through extra mobile data. We've got some infrastructure repair work to do and some building repair work to do. Clearly, that's going to be non-recurring in nature. Just the overall state of the evaluation is still going on, obviously. From a Proximus Group perspective, we have insurance that covers those costs, and therefore, we fully expect it to be very immaterial in the H2 of the year, net of the insurance costs, insurance refunds. Thank you very much for both answers. Thank you. Thank you. Next question from Roshan Ranjit from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you for the questions this afternoon. Just two from me. Excuse me, sorry. Quickly to follow up on the fiber, one of the previous questions. We've seen this nice pickup in the rollout rate, and obviously, I guess we're going to see that really kick on in the H2 of the year, given the JV that's already closed and one expected, I think in the coming days maybe. How should we think about that rollout run rate for the coming quarters? I guess we should expect above 100,000 or so by the end of the year on a quarterly run rate. Is that fair? Secondly, Guillaume, you mentioned some of the discussions around the open network, and at the moment, I think it's still some of the smaller operators. Are the discussions changing versus what they were, say, last year? Again, I appreciate the rollout coverage is 10%, so still relatively limited. Are some of the operators trying to focus on shorter time frames, or maybe you're trying to lock them in on longer time frames? Anything you could say there would be very helpful. Thank you. Okay, this is Geert speaking. On the rollout, as you said, we're perfectly on plan. You know that we've announced figures for this year, and we're spot on, I would say. You can count on what we have communicated there. Indeed, we are going to catch up. We're going to catch up through the JVs, but also by further increasing our standalone rollout. We've always said publicly that we want to move to a rate which is about covering 10% of the country per year. Towards next year, we'll double the pace versus last year. For next year, we have ± the same ambition. The JVs, with respect to your remark, yes, indeed, the JVs are in the air. We will start deploying already in Q4 of this year. The kick-in of the JVs, you should mostly think of that for next year. Just on your second question about the discussions in between operators to access different networks. Of course, I cannot comment on that today. I will just restate what I just said before, is I think we are building a network which is an open one. We are welcoming operators, whatever the size. I think that building that network and being the first to build that network could provide us a nice advantage, first for retail operation, but also for wholesale discussions as well. Okay, that's great, thank you. Thank you ladies and gentlemen, you have another question please press four one. Zero is one on the telephone keypad. You have to press four one on your telephone keypad. Ladies and gentlemen, you have another question, you have to press four one on your telephone keypad. Looks like we don't have any more questions. Oh, we have a new question arriving. I'm sorry. We have a new question once again from Nicolas Cote-Colisson from HSBC. Please go ahead. Thank you. Very short one. Can we have an update on the phasing on the implementation costs and eventually savings for the network sharing because of the initial delays? I just want to make sure that the phasing is still the same or has changed. In terms of the overall program, the program's ramping up, and we're slightly, I'd say, in terms of the number of sites behind for this year, but the overall longer-term plan is still on track, and therefore, the overall savings from our perspective are in line with what we previously communicated. In terms of the integration costs or the upfront costs, do you think they will be going through 2021, or there could be a bit less this year and still a bit for next year? Yeah. On the overall integration cost, we are seeing some of that, and I think we communicated that earlier as part of our overall OpEx development in the year. We are seeing some of that. There is possibly an immaterial movement between 2021 and 2022 that will happen because of the slightly slower ramp up, but overall, it's not material at the Proximus level. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. It looks like we don't have any more questions. Back to you for the conclusion. Thank you all for your participation. As usual, should you have any follow-up questions, you can address these to the investor relations team. I wish you all a very good weekend. Bye. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you all for your participation. You may now disconnect your lines.