Good morning, everyone, to Umicore's Capital Markets Day here in London and also a warm welcome to those of you who are joining us today. I realize I don't have the clicker with me. If we could go to the next slide already. Today's presentation will contain forward-looking statements. Please do have a look at our cautionary statement online. Now let's move to the purpose of today. Today, our management will present to you our strategic roadmap towards 2030. They will share our ambition. They will explain how our technology positions and our market positions in the different activities will allow us to leverage these positions and create sustainable value and growth. If we have a closer look at the agenda, our CEO, Mathias Miedreich, will start today's presentation and he will explain how our strongly rooted strategic foundations put us in an excellent position to write the next exciting chapter of Umicore. He will present both the ambitions and the pillars of our strategy. Frank Daufenbach, our Chief Strategy Officer, will walk you through the strategy drivers of Umicore. He will outline the opportunities ahead, particularly in mobility transformation and he will also explain how all Umicore activities have their role to play in the next chapter of our strategy. We will then move over to Filip Platteeuw, our CFO, who will provide the financial overview and who will outline how our strategy is designed to create sustainable value by balancing growth, returns and cash flows. We will then move over to Géraldine Nolens, EVP ESG and General Counsel, who will demonstrate how we go for zero. In particular, she will walk you through the climate action plan here at Umicore. You will see that at Umicore, it's not only about minimizing the impact of our operations, it is about maximizing the positive impact we have on society. In fact, you will see that sustainability is a common thread throughout the day and that is not a coincidence. After these group presentations, we will dive into the strategic drivers and ambitions of our different activities. The rest of the presentation is actually built around the mega trends that are driving our businesses. Starting with the accelerating need for advanced materials, then Denis Goffaux, our EVP Recycling, will show how our advanced materials are key enabling technologies in today's life. He will then also explain how Precious Metals Refining is excellently positioned to continue creating substantial value. This afternoon's presentations are all about our activities that are not only driven by but also enabling mobility transformation. We start with Ralph Kiessling, who will explain how we aim to capture profitable growth in Rechargeable Battery Materials. We have Bart Sap, EVP Catalysis, who will first talk about our Automotive Catalysts activity. He will explain how we aim to capture the market peak and how we will constantly maximize business value for his activity throughout the plan. He will also then take the opportunity to explain how our technology leadership in PEM fuel cell catalyst puts us in an excellent position to capture growth in that emerging market. We then move over to Kurt Vandeputte, who will close the loop and who will showcase that thanks to our front-runner position in battery recycling, we are gearing up for profitable growth in that area, too. At the end of the day, Mathias will close the presentations with his closing remarks. A full day and just a few practical things before I hand over to Mathias. Q&A. We hope you have plenty of questions for us, so we have organized four Q&A sessions. We will first prioritize the questions in the audience here but we also invite the audience at home to submit their questions through the chat and we will try to answer these q uestions as well today. The presentations that will be shown today will also be put on our website every time at the beginning of each presentation. You have the QR code on the tables, which brings you directly to the relevant page on our website. With this, I would like to ask Mathias to come on stage. Thank you very much, Evelien. Also from my side, a very warm welcome to all the audience here in London and of course to everybody who is connected via live stream to this hybrid event today. This is a big day for us because we will share with you our strategy for 2030. A strategy for a decade that is characterized by transformation and change. What we will try to explain to you is what are the drivers that we see, the mega trends that we base our strategy on. What is the financial ambition, the financial mechanics that work so we can create value with all the investments that we are doing to the extent that we earn more than the cost of our capital? Finally, how do our different businesses, the business units that we have, contribute to that strategy individually but also as a grand total of Umicore with the complementarity of their properties? Before doing that, I am very happy that I can introduce the speakers of today again quickly, the management board of Umicore, all of them are here today. Each of my colleagues will cover a different part of the presentation, starting with Filip Platteeuw, who I think I don't need to introduce to you. A long-term member of Umicore and long-term CFO of the group. Next in line is Frank Daufenbach, our Chief Strategy Officer. Frank Daufenbach joined the group beginning of 2022 with 10 years' experience in automotive, 10 years' experience in strategy consulting. He is now driving the strategic agenda of the group and he will share that just after my presentation with all of us. Géraldine Nolens will talk about ESG because she is responsible for the ESG initiative of the group. In other responsibilities, she is the Chief Legal Counsel and responsible for health, environmental and safety, as well as for purchasing and other important group processes that we have lined up. We have our three business group EVPs that are each responsible for one of the business groups. Bart Sap, who is heading the Catalysis business group. Bart joined the management board beginning of 2021, also with a long career in Umicore in different steps and different management responsibilities. We have Ralph Kiessling covering E&ST, Energy & Surface Technologies. Ralph also took that position beginning of 2021. Before that, he was responsible as EVP for the Catalysis business group, also with more than 10 years' experience in the automotive industry. Last but not least, Denis Goffaux, who is running the Recycling business group. Denis had several roles before being responsible for the battery materials in E&ST, as well as having been the Chief Technology Officer of the group. You will hopefully see after this presentation how positively diverse this team is in terms of experience profiles, industries, functions but also international exposure and that there is a strong complementarity between the different team members. Complementarity is a word that you will hear more today from me and my colleagues in several aspects. I want to remind ourselves of the structure of the group. We are organized in 11 business units. Those business units are grouped in three business groups, as we said, Catalysis, Energy & Surface Technologies and Recycling. We have all of those business units embedded in our strategy. They play an important part in our way to 2030. However, for today, we have selected five that we will dive into more detail. Automotive Catalysts, Fuel Cell, Rechargeable Battery Materials, the Precious Metals Refining, as well as the newest kid on the block, which is the Battery Recycling Solutions that we have just founded beginning of the year and that is headed by Dr. Kurt Vandeputte, who will also share the strategy of the group. He's with us here today and he will give us all the insights on battery recycling future for Umicore. I'm now nearly nine months in the role as CFO of Umicore and I want to share with you very quickly what are my key takeaways, what are the strong points that I found when I arrived in the group and what are the next steps, the points we still need to improve in order to be able to successfully deliver the strategy that we are presenting today. The strengths, for me are pretty clear. Technology is deeply rooted inside of Umicore. There's a long tradition. There's a strong portfolio of innovations of IP, of technologies in the whole group. Probably what we did not do so much is to talk about that. For today, hopefully, you have some good surprises as well in this regard, how strong our technology portfolio i s. Secondly and I've talked about it on multiple occasions already, the people in Umicore, the level of competence and expertise paired with the humbleness is really outstanding in the industry and also the great sense of purpose that we have, that is in every of our locations, in every our business units is really outstanding. The portfolio of Umicore, you will hear me talk about today, in several ways. The portfolio is a strong one because it has the right business units, each of them individually. The complementarity and the value creation model especially is something that is, what I think, one of its kind in the industry and puts us in a privileged starting position. Last but not least, the sustainability aspect. Sustainability is and was always a key part of Umicore. Umicore being a front runner in many of those items. Also here you will see that our ambition is not stopping there. What are the things that we need to look at in the next time to be able to deliver our 2030 strategy? There are three things that I want to mention. First of all, it is transparency and visibility. We have to share more with our partners, with our customers, with the supply chain ecosystem that we have and with the capital markets, give more details of what we are planning, how we are planning it and why. Please see this today as a next step in the evolution of this process. I have received, when I started my journey as CEO, several feedback in this regard and I will be very interested in your feedback after this day if we have made a next step up in disclosure and transparency. Size and speed is something very important. We are presenting a very ambitious plan. This plan is to grow our company in a very short period of time. Umicore is known for its robust operational model but we have to prepare the company for this scale-up. We have to make sure that we can deliver the promises to our customer, that we make to our customers. We have to look to all of the organization, the processes, the staffing to make the group fit for this fast growth that we think will be value-creative into the future. Secondly, it's thirdly, it is the ecosystem that we have. We believe in an ecosystem to carry the load of this highly changing and transforming industry. An ecosystem that is across the value chain and drives also new models that we have with our customers. We will talk about it throughout the day. Models that have not been thinkable of a couple of years ago that even include co-investments but also a very strong cooperation on the R&D side. I think this is something Umicore has started to be more open to it and we see already that we can harvest the fruits of that journey. Before we talk about the future, let us spend two-three minutes to talk about the past. Over the last 20 years, Umicore has been built on very sound foundations. If you look to the previous strategic plans and what have been the conclusions out of that, the unique business model that includes circularity and metals couldn't be more actual than today in the electrification transformation. The megatrends that have been the background of the strategy, they are more than confirmed. They are not in question anymore. Last but not least, sustainability is not thinkable to be removed of any company's strategy, especially in the field that Umicore is located in. This has been also proven by the successful delivery of the Horizon 2020. That was the name of the last strategic plan that was launched in 2015, with in 2021 the disclosure of the Let's go for Zero strategy and finally, by the record results that have been delivered in 2021. What better platform, what better foundation could you want to start now a 2030 journey? We don't stop there. We have an ambition to rise. We have an ambition to rise above the successful past. We have an ambition to create an even bolder and even faster Umicore into the future. I want to share with you now the key pillars of that strategy. Going forward, we will always come back to the same, strategic rationales of this plan that we have. The first thing is we have strong megatrends that carry this strategic plan. I think there's nobody in this room or online that would doubt that the trend of electrification is confirmed and is going forward. This will transform our addressable markets fundamentally in terms of size, tripling versus 2030. This is a very strong driver of our strategy. We don't have to ask ourselves the question where to play. We are playing exactly in the right field. It's more the how. How are we implementing a value creation strategy with all of the difficulties that you have in such a fast-growing market? The core of our strategy is centered around our customers. We think that Umicore has a value proposition like nearly no other company in this field, being a true transformation partner of our customers. We will talk about that value proposition in a second but it's something that is unlocking new ways of partnership. We have communicated on some of them already. You will hear throughout the day more details on our plans forward. This is very important to understand that this is an important part that sets us apart, if you want, from the rest of the market, that we have accumulation of assets and an accumulation of abilities that exactly address the pain points and the problems that the automotive OEMs have in the energy transition. We will talk about that in detail. We have the word RISE and we said RISE is an expression of our ambition to rise above previous levels but it's also an expression of four important pillars. Each of these letters stands for one of the pillars that is carrying the strategy forward. We will explain those pillars in a second. I will not go into detail for the moment. I will share now what is the result of this plan. This result of this plan is a fast growth. A fast growth with us being able to more than double the revenues of the group towards 2030, with a constant value creation and an EBITDA over 20% and a ROCE ambition in 2030 of 15%. You can see the whole management board presenting today, we have a strong conviction that this might be an ambitious target. But it's a realistic target because we have the right measures in place to make it happen and this will be. These four points, they will follow us through the presentations of today to explain our underlying rationale. Megatrends. We have seen what are the megatrends of the past. These are the three megatrends that we build our strategy on. Mobility transformation on the one hand, we have combined what we have formerly been calling the need for emission control technologies and electrification. This is the mobility transformation. Then there is the growing need for advanced materials. Advanced metal materials that are part of many industries and many applications, electronics, aerospace, food industry, pharma industry. So Umicore has a lot of positions in those value chains in advanced materials. We will talk about that and this is really something that we want to selectively further invest to harvest the good returns that we can get from this business. Then the overarching trend is circularity. Circularity for critical metals is something that is touching all of our 11 business units and that is a strong driver of also our value creation proposal that we have. Now, I've talked about our unique value proposition to customers. What is this value proposition? Why are we sure that we have a privileged starting point versus others? If you put yourself into the shoes of a car manufacturer, of an OEM, you have to ask you some very critical questions to which Umicore provides the answer. Your first question is, where do I get the metals from? Metals are at the core of the electrification transformation. If you do not have a secured supply chain of the metals that you need for your batteries, you will not be able to put this into the ground. In the strategic roadmaps of the OEMs, securing that supply chain has reached a very important stage. Umicore is very well-positioned. We have a history of mining. We have been a mining company before. We understand very well the upstream, how we call it, the upstream processes. We have ambition from mine to battery, so from refining to the battery material to have not only the capabilities but also the capacities to support the OEMs. We see a lot of traction from that side, OEMs coming to us, asking us if we can support them, help them secure the supply chain. This drives also the co-investment model that I have been talking about. The second question you have to ask yourself when you have secured your metals, "Will I have the plants that produce the cathode active material for me?" You know, each of the OEMs have ambitious plans for electrification, fast ramp-ups in all regions of the world and the cathode material market has to follow. They have to trust partners that have a proven ability to scale up in large size, in the quality, the reliability and the cost that is needed. Umicore is a pioneer in battery materials. Since over 20 years we are in this game, we have launched several gigafactories. The experience we have since nearly 50 years in the automotive catalyst business as a reliable operational partner to deliver high quality in absolutely the right conditions to our automotive customers give us a very strong reputation at that point. We see that also reflected in the discussions we have with them. The third question of the OEMs is, "Okay, I have secured my metals, I know where to produce it but how can I make sure that the electric car I'm producing is really CO2 neutral? How can I work on the supply chain that I have also in the production of the car? The majority of the CO2 is created by the battery and in the battery it's the battery material. How can I decarbonize that?" Umicore has always been a front runner in sustainability, in decarbonization, in sustainable sourcing. What we will present today, our ambition on the Scope 3 roadmap, our plan to decarbonize the battery supply chain, where we think we have not only a good position but also an obligation because of that and Géraldine will touch that in the later presentation, is something that the OEMs and also, I have to say our supply chain partners. Th e ones that are actually doing the mining upstream are very receptive to the proposal that we have and this is a strong linkage point that we have with them. After you have solved all of these equations, the next question is, "How can I solve my circularity problem?" This circularity problem is twofold. First of all, I need to do recycling to secure materials, because without recycling, we will not have the right amounts of materials available. The second question is, "How can I meet regulatory requirements, laws that will be in place that require me to put so and so much percentage of recycled material in my products?" Umicore has been, since many decades in the business of recycling, has a very good technology position, understanding of the business model, everything that is around the recycling of metals. We have been able to transfer this now into battery recycling and you will see our plan going forward through Kurt's presentation, where you will see how we are proposing what we think is the best-in-class technology at large scale early to the market, which will help us to secure market shares pretty soon. The second or the last, the fifth in this case question, is of course, are my partners in for the long run? Each OEM has the question of combustion engines going down. There's a transfer to electrification and what they want is a partner that has skin in the game. Now we have skin in the game because we have automotive catalyst business. We are in fuel cell catalysts and we are in battery materials. We are not either/or, we are all in and this is something that really resonates with the car manufacturers to have one partner they can trust to be with them in the holistic view and not only on separate slices where there are dynamics that they cannot control. Taking all of this together, we truly think we have a privileged starting position. Before now going into the details through my colleagues of the different strategies in the business groups, I would like to give you a high-level overview on the three business groups or businesses that we are going forward, starting with the battery materials and talking about Automotive Catalysts and finally Recycling. First, let's have a look at rechargeable batteries. When we want to understand our strategy for rechargeable batteries, you have to go back in time. Umicore was a pioneer in delivering cathode active materials for mostly consumer electronic applications, since decades already in the game, working directly with our customers and at that time, nearly exclusively have been the cell makers from a commercial but also from an engineering point of view. This phase was an important phase because we have been laying the foundations of our global production footprint and the chemistries of our battery roadmap. Now, something like, in 2020, 2021, something changed. The OEMs realized that they need to play a bigger role in the battery supply chain. They have to do that to secure the supply of, materials, of metals.0 They have to do that because they want to influence more the properties, the technical properties of the battery and you can only do that through the battery material. They need to do it because of the CO2 equation, because they have to have a grip on what's going on to reduce the CO2 in the supply chain. That's why we saw this swing, as I have already pointed it out, where now the OEMs in different degrees are themselves involving them in batteries. The extreme case to produce batteries themselves but also by designing and determining the properties and then, you know, giving these requirements to the cell makers that then work with the cathode material makers. There is a much bigger involvement and this drives new ways of partnership. We think that we are pioneering this type of partnerships, even with co-investments with customers, with partnerships that go beyond a pure supplier-customer relationship. It's a true partnership on several aspects and Ralph will go in more detail in his presentation. This is the phase that will go this year, next year and starting 2024, we will go into the next phase of battery materials. We call it ramping up. We will be ramping up not only the manufacturing capacities globally, the manufacturing capacities also along the value chain. We see a big value to have not only the last step of cathode manufacturing but to really go upstream to refining, to influence the supply chain from a securitization point of view but also from an influential point of view, CO2. But also the cost of the whole supply chain, can be better addressed if you have the things in hand and this is something that we are doing. Secondly, it is the ramping up of the battery material chemistry roadmaps. We will, you know, not talk about any more mid-nickel, high-nickel and so on. We have done this. We talk about much more the future. We have new chemistries coming into play, HLM. Manganese-rich technologies that are contenders to the LFP technologies for design to cost applications, solid-state battery materials, where we are already active since 2017. You might know that, we never said that also, that we already today nearly with 15 running programs in pre-developments and to get qualifications with OEMs on the solid-state side. There is a new exciting development that is called catholyte and this will also be explained later by Ralph. Then we go into the phase beyond 2026. We call them the acceleration phase, where there will be significant growth paired with a sweet spot of returns and you will also see that we can harvest the fruits of our Scope 3 roadmap in this time frame. Catalysis is characterized by two things. On the one side, it's the automotive catalysts that have, other than it might be intuitive, still a growth in front of them. The peak of our business will be in 2026, while the market is expected to peak in 2023. The reason why this is the case is because we have a very preferential product mix in terms of gasoline technologies versus the upcoming new emission legislations. Secondly, we will gain market share in heavy-duty China and in Europe and that will help us to even grow to 2026. Even in 2030, we expect to be at a level of 2021. You see that this is a business that is very much contributing to our value creation model that I will explain in a minute. That will help us to create about EUR 3 billion of free cash flow that we will be able to invest into the future businesses of Umicore. Bart will explain all the mechanics behind. Bart will also explain the other part of his business, fuel cell, that has a totally different equation, where we have a very strong position today. We are the market leader in PEM fuel cell catalysts. We have a very strong technology offer in terms of performance but also cost to our OEMs and we are pioneering with capacity investments and this will be also explained by Bart how we will be further growing our strong market positions in fuel cells. Last but not least, recycling. Here, there are two elements of recycling, precious metal recycling or precious metal refining, where we have built in the plan, I would say, a conservative assumption or a realistic assumption of precious metal pricing normalizing over the period. Filip will give you the details of the mechanics behind, so we do not bet on the high levels that we have today. Even with this assumption, through operational excellence and the improvement measures that we're doing every day, we will be able to yield very significant returns from that business over the period. And then secondly, there is the equation of CO2. We are positioning ourselves as the world leader in low carbon recycling and the premiums that we will be able, we believe, to harvest out of that are not even included in our today's equation. The second part is battery recycling. Battery recycling will already represent 30% of the EBITDA of recycling in 2030 or more than 30%. We have an ambitious plan to scale up our capacities that will also be explained later in this presentation. Also here in recycling, a good self-balancing of the activities. I have talked about some of the elements of strategies of the different business units and business groups and you can see here a list of them listed again. They're individually strong but also they have something in common. They have themes that go across the different business groups. Everything regarding to metals, how to manage metals, how to do engineering, R&D technology with metals is very clear. The circularity aspect is going through all of the different business groups and business units. Sustainability is a common thread that you will see everywhere. There are a lot of synergies that you have with those business groups and a lot of complementarities on a business and technology side. On top of that, those business groups, because of their different position in the life cycle, they represent a very strong value creation model that I'd like to explain to you today. Some of our businesses are in a clear scale-up phase. Battery materials, battery recycling and fuel cells, they are growing a lot and they need funding. They need to be invested in to be able to grow and we are operating those units exactly with this mindset. Automotive Catalysts is in a different state. As I have just told you, Automotive Catalysts is in a cash production mode, a free cash flow cycle that I would like to show you as well, if my clicker would work. Yes, it's working now. Operate for cash is the paradigm that we are running this business with a detailed strategy that will be explained and that will of course help to fund to a very strong extent the investments that we have into the future. We have a third part of our portfolio that are business units that are champions in their respective markets. They have very strong returns today, very strong value creation, very strong ROCE. We want to keep that. We want to even selectively invest that, not only because we want to enjoy the returns but also as a means of diversification of the group towards a broader industrial base. With this mechanics altogether, we truly think that we have found a way that all of the pieces in the puzzle are fitting together in the right setup to build the big picture that we want to achieve for 2030. Now, this picture, how does it look like in terms o f growth? I said it before, the plan that we are presenting today, we are convinced it will unlock growth for Umicore, very significant growth, nearly or more than doubling our revenues to 2030, between EUR 5 billion and EUR 6 billion of revenues on top. Now, when I said it will unlock significant growth, it is not an unrestricted growth. There is one paradigm that you will see throughout our strategy today that is value creation. We will only invest in businesses that will create value, that will create returns above the cost of capital. We will not go into contracts with customers and with no exception that is not holding up to this threshold. You will see this explained later on also in Filip's presentation but all my colleagues have this same paradigm. We are not looking to maximize our top line. We are looking to maximize the value creation and I think with what we have here, we have the right setup. Another very important thing to mention. Uninterrupted or continuous value creation, what does that mean? It means that, of course, our businesses have different positions in the life cycle. Some of them are more value creative than others today but some of them are also more growing. That's what I have shown you in the other slide. It's a puzzle that is moving. As a group, in the envelope of Umicore, because we have this very strong value creative model, we will always be value creative and we will always earn our cost of capital throughout the plan. This is something that is enabled by the strong portfolio that I have just laid out. This is the strategy. Now, we have talked a lot about RIS and I want to share with you before I hand over to my colleagues what exactly means RISE. It's an ambitious word. We want to rise above the ambitions of the past but each of the letters stands for one of the pillars that we need to execute to be successful. The first letter is R. We want to be a reliable transformation partner for our customers. We want to help them with their own transformation, with the value proposition that I have just explained on the slides before. This is really something that in this changing world is a key asset that in all of our strategies is very high on the agenda. Secondly, innovation and technology leader. We have the ambition to continue to be an innovation and technology leader, to be a front runner in the fields where we are. You can see here this nice ball that you see in the background. It's not a new planet that we found. It is a GSP, a genuinely spherical precursor that has been micro engineered. With that, it's perfectly round, so the package density can be much higher. Yielding higher energy density. You see these porosities where you can do something called doping already in the precursor process that avoids to do that in the CAM production, which is a cost saving as well. It is a technology that if you would just look at the black powder that you see Umicore plant shipping, you would never think that this high-tech micro engineered product is in this black powder that you are you know scooping in the bulk. The attention is to the details, and one of the takeaways is also we have to talk more about the technologies that are underlying our strategies. Sustainability champion, I think this is not a surprise. This is in the DNA of Umicore. This is our tradition, this is our history and we have the ambition to even accelerate above what we have done in the past, helping to reduce the battery material equation, the battery supply chain. The plan that we were presenting today is to reduce the carbon footprint of our Scope 3 emissions in battery material over the whole supply chain until 2030 by 75% compared to the industry average today. In other words, we will be able to save around 8 million tons of CO₂. Now, we are doing this because we want to contribute to the decarbonization of the planet but also because it's a strong competitive lever and I leave it up to you, whatever CO₂ price you want to take into account. What the valuation of this reduction would be worth, in our value proposition to the customers. Excellence in execution. I talked about our customers and that they are trusting in us. We are making a promise to our customers. We will be there for you. We will execute, we will ramp up and we will deliver. This is very important for us that we are honoring the promises we do to our customers. Umicore is very well-positioned in operational execution but the ambition of the plan and the growth and the speed requires special attention on excellence and execution. This is a pillar that in each of our strategies we're looking at and on corporate level. We have an initiative that is covering that into the future that we can scale up with the demands that we put ourselves in terms of growth. Now, if I want to summarize all of that before handing over to my colleagues. We have a strategy that is ambitious, that is bold, that is based on strong megatrends. One KPI I forgot to mention earlier, I want to do that. When I talk about growth and the mechanics of the underlying market, the market is growing a lot but also the mechanics are great. The CPV, the content per vehicle that we have on a combustion engine car is around EUR 100. If you compare this to a CPV that we have on a battery electric vehicle, it goes up to EUR 700. You can see it's not only the market itself is growing, also the mechanics below. We don't have to doubt in the drivers for our growth. At the same time, we think that we have a specific privileged value proposition to the OEMs of the automotive market. I have explained why we think this is the case and with that, we are sure that the value-creating investments that we are looking for is something feasible that we can do and our current traction proves this for us. We have the RISE pillars that I have just explained to you that each of them will be an important part of our strategy forward. With all of that, I hope at the end of the day you will share our conviction that we have an ambitious but realistic plan. Now a short movie to. No? No movie? Okay, the movie comes later. I hand over to Frank Daufenbach, who will now explain more details on the strategic drivers behind our journey. Thank you very much. Thank you, Mathias. Good morning, everyone. I was hoping to surf the wave of the nice movie but we'll do without that. Happy to be here this morning. Hello, as well, to everybody who's watching from home or from their offices. My name is Frank Daufenbach. I'm in charge of strategy for Umicore. I joined the group six months ago and I'm very happy to be sharing with you today the key drivers of our strategy 2030 plan. We will be addressing two questions today, essentially. We'll be looking at the external drivers of our strategy and we'll be addressing the question, are we in the right markets? Are we in the right place? And then we'll be looking at internal drivers and we'll answer the question, do we have the right assets? Do we have the right portfolio to seize the opportunity from the markets we are in? Let's start with the right markets, with the external view. Mathias mentioned three mega trends that we are benefiting from and that we are embracing. The first of these three mega trends is the growing need for advanced materials. What do we mean by that? Advanced materials are engineered metals that we make in order to enable technologies. These are metals or materials that you find in technologies we use every day in our day-to-day life. They are in our smartphones, in fertilizers, in healthcare products, in optic fiber cables, et cetera. Every day, each of us is using Umicore inside products. The seven business units you see here on the right-hand side of this page are the ones that are really embracing this trend of growing need for advanced materials. They are the ones that are enabling the products I just mentioned. That's the first trend and that's the first illustration of how we are embracing this first trend. The second trend that Mathias highlighted is mobility transformation. Now, what is mobility transformation? Mobility transformation is essentially our willingness to have cleaner ways of transportation with a lower CO₂ footprint and with less pollutants. The ways to do that are threefold today. You can electrify your powertrain and this is mostly made through battery electric vehicles, which are supported by our rechargeable battery materials business unit. You can make cleaner combustion engines, which is done by our automotive catalysts business unit. You can leverage hydrogen as a fuel for transportation, which is what our fuel cells business unit is supporting. As you can see, we are facilitating, we are enabling every aspect of this mobility transformation. On top of that, our newest business unit, Battery Recycling Solutions, is closing the loop on electrification, making sure that the essential and critical metals that are used for battery electric vehicles can be re-used a number of times and that we further reduce the CO₂ impact of electrification. Finally, the third trend that Mathias highlighted is the circularity for critical metals and this one is really embedded in every single of our eleven business units. It's not only in our Recycling business group, it's across all of these business units. All of them are either using or making second life materials. As you can see, we are really ideally positioned to take full advantage of these three mega trends. What I would like to do now is a double click or a deep dive on the mobility transformation trend to illustrate how beneficial it can be to be supported like this, to embrace one of these mega trends. Let's look at mobility transformation. The main impact of mobility transformation is electrification. Electric vehicles represent around 5% of the new vehicles sold today. By 2030, they will represent 34%. This is an extremely fast growth and this is a growth that is not only driven by regulation anymore, it's driven by a customer pool. We've seen that the customers want this product and it's driven by OEMs as well, who are all investing massively to support this change. This is a global phenomenon but it has some regional differences. Right now, we see, for instance, that Europe and China seem to be electrifying slightly faster. We have all heard about the announcement of the European Parliament banning the sale of new combustion engine vehicles in Europe starting in 2035. Europe and China are slightly ahead but this is really a global phenomenon. 1/3 of vehicles will be fully electric in 2030. This means 2/3 will still have a combustion engine and that's the other important message on this page. The transition towards cleaner mobility cannot be done without clean combustion engines because they will still represent 2/3 of the vehicles sold in 2030. Now, what does that all mean in terms of business opportunity for Umicore? This chart is showing the growth of our addressable market in mobility between now and 2030. Today, we have an addressable market in mobility of around EUR 9 billion per year and this is growing to 25-30 billion in 2030, so 3x. This is what the impact of this megatrend is on our addressable market. Let's look at the details. What is driving this growth? The blue bars at the top are the Automotive Catalysts market and you see that these bars are roughly staying the same between 2021 and 2030. It's a stable market. In between 2021 and 2030, you see that the bar is slightly bigger. This is the peak that Mathias was mentioning and that Bart will explain in his presentation. After that, you see three segments that are electrification related, fuel cells, battery recycling, cathode materials. Cathode materials is by far the biggest of these segments. Why is that? This is because of the content per vehicle that Mathias highlighted before. We have a content per vehicle for battery electric vehicle that is 7-10 times bigger compared to our content for combustion engine. This is why this is driving such growth. What's interesting about this growth is that it's not only a big market, it's also an attractive market and Ralph will explain that in his presentation. It's not just the sheer size of this market that's interesting, it's also the attractiveness as a whole and the ability for the players in this market to create value. The other two markets on this page are fuel cells and battery recycling. You see that they are still relatively small in 2030 and that's because most of their growth is actually happening after 2030. For instance, in battery recycling between 2030 and 2035, the size of the market is going to be multiplied by three. You see a lot of the growth is happening after this chart and Kurt will tell you more about the drivers of battery recycling and why it will grow after our time horizon. This is, I think, a good example of the benefits there is to being positioned on the right markets, supported by powerful megatrends. Now, we have established that we are in the right place. We are supported by these three megatrends. We are on growing markets. We are meeting the needs of everyone. Anyone who needs clean transportation or who needs technology or who aspires to a more sustainable world will have a value proposition from Umicore. Now, do we have the right portfolio to address these market opportunities? What's a good portfolio? A good portfolio is a portfolio with synergies. Mathias highlighted before the complementarity of our different businesses in terms of value creation. You remember the scale up versus cultivate versus free cash flow. This is a complementarity in terms of value creation. What I would like to highlight on this page is more the complementarity, the synergies in terms of operations, in terms of managing the businesses. It's a long and wordy slide. I will only touch on a few points. First point, metal management and metal technology. We are a metal company at the core. This is shared by all our 11 business units. We know the technology of metals, the chemistry, the science and we know the business models of metals, sourcing, trading and financing. That's one area of clear synergies. All of our business units are using this. A second area of synergy is the circularity. As Mathias said, this is embedded in every single of our 11 business units and this necessitates a certain expertise as well in terms of your sourcing, the management of your supply chain, the management of your customer and just managing this very unique business model of circularity. A third area of synergy is the customer intimacy and that's really a critical one. This ability that we have to be a reliable transformation partner for our customers. We are, we think, uniquely positioned to support our automotive customers in their complete journey from internal combustion engine towards electrification. We think this is really a unique value proposition. For a number of these synergies, you see that there is the RISE logo in front of it and it means that we believe there is acceleration potential for this synergy. I'll take a couple of examples of areas where we think we can accelerate, we can do more in terms of synergies. Operational efficiency. We have started digital initiatives but we will accelerate them and there is a lot of potential there that is still untapped. Another area where we will accelerate is ESG. Sustainability is at our core. Mathias said that we would repeat it and I repeat it. All my colleagues will repeat it as well. Sustainability is at our core and we think we will continue to use it as a differentiator. This is not a must-have. This is not a box we need to check. For us, it's a competitive advantage. Concretely, what does it mean? It means we want to be the company that will enable the decarbonization of the battery supply chain. It's that type of commitment that we want to make and this is what we mean by sustainability champion. To illustrate a little bit our unique value proposition, I will again do a deep dive on the mobility side of things to show how we are uniquely positioned to support the electrification journey of our customers. Electrification is mobility powered by metals. If you don't manage metals correctly, there's no electrification. It's as simple as that. Batteries are really metal-hungry animals. You need to be able to source the metals in an environment where demand is accelerating and therefore sourcing is not obvious. You need to be able to transform efficiently these metals in a cost-efficient way and also in a performance-oriented way, because performance will be completely dependent on how you manage these metals from durability to safety. Managing the cost is critical as well. I remind you that more than half of the cost of a battery pack is metals today. The last thing you need to be able to do with metals is recycle them. This is going to be mandated by regulation. Very soon you will have to recycle at least 90% or even more of your critical metals in a battery. This is also an imperative from a sustainability commitment standpoint. We don't want to dig the earth for all these metals. We want to recycle as much as we can. To support electrification for our customers, you need to know metals but of course, you also need to know the automotive industry, 'cause at the end of the day, these are our customers. You need to be at the intersection of these two worlds and this is precisely what we are. We've been a metal company for a couple of centuries and we've been in the automotive industry for 40-50 years. It's hard to think of a company that is better positioned to support electrification as the intersection between metals and the automotive industry. We are in the right markets and as we've seen, these markets are growing extremely fast and we are there with the right assets, a complementary set of business units. We have all it takes to take full advantage, full benefits from the opportunities ahead of us. In that context, the role of the RISE pillars is to accelerate our success. I will go through these pillars again because they will be a structuring element in the presentations of all my colleagues. Each and every of the business unit presentations you will hear today will refer to these as a way to achieve success. The R is for reliable transformation partner. This is our willingness to always listen to our customers and meet their needs. This is illustrated in mobility by the fact that we support from combustion engines to electrification, both fuel cell and battery electric. It's also the case in our other activities where we are always working with our customers to enable the next upcoming technology. Innovation and technology leader, this is something that is deeply rooted and that we will continue to nurture and accelerate simply because the markets we are in are also accelerating. Sustainability champion, I gave the example of the decarbonization of the battery supply chain. This is the kind of commitment that we want to make. This is what we mean by sustainability champion. Excellence in execution, this is a must because we have so much growth ahead of us that we need to execute in an excellent fashion in order to create the value that we expect and that you expect. Now that's the wrap-up page that's trying to capture a lot of what we have said so far on just one page. What did we say? We have an excellent starting point. We are supported by powerful mega trends. We have the right portfolio to benefit from these mega trends and we are a purpose-driven company. That's our excellent starting point. The RISE execution pillars will enable our success and I've just detailed the four axes of this. These pillars will enable our success. What success? Well, it's here and these are the numbers that Mathias already shared briefly before. Very high growth, growing like a startup company but at the same time, always creating value in every steps of the way. We believe it's a pretty unique combination to have a startup-like growth with uninterrupted value creation as part of a credible plan. To give more details about this value creation journey, I will now hand over to my colleague, Filip Platteeuw, who will tell you everything about the financials. Thank you. Thanks, Frank. Good morning, everybody and t hanks a lot for your interest in Umicore. I almost feel like apologizing for this very innovative, creative title of my section. At the same time, I think it covers everything there is to say in this strategy. What I would like to talk to you about in this section is, first of all, give you an insight in the value-creating framework we have in Umicore. That is how the different businesses actually fit together, also, not just from a technology point of view, market point of view but also financial point of view. Really the synergies between businesses from a financial point of view. Secondly, obviously, share with you the ambitions we have in terms of our growth and we will do that by looking at 2026 and 2030, because we really feel these are two distinct kind of periods. Then obviously, in order to generate those, that growth, we'll have to invest. Also explain to you a bit about the investments and how those relate to returns and to our, cash flows. Now, before we look at the future, allow me to look only with two slides to the past in the rear view mirror, because I think accountability is important. In 2015, we were standing here as well with an ambitious strategy. I think it makes sense to explain to you and see whether what we promised then, what we achieved of that. Secondly, because, as mentioned already by Mathias, this plan again builds a lot on the previous plans. I think in order to also understand the ambition, it's important to calibrate where we start from. This first slide talks about the financial targets we had set in our Horizon 2020 strategy communicated in 2015. Two legs, accelerating profitable growth. Sounds familiar. You see the targets here. Secondly, higher investments but then also a return on those investments. What did we achieve? 2020 was a bit of a difficult reference year given COVID but you see that we achieved those targets. 2021, obviously, with the recover and then with the record metal prices, we overachieved again. The only caveat on this slide is you see the return on capital employed. W W e set a target at 15%. We did reach it in 2021 but in 2020 we were below that. Again, not the easiest of reference years but I think this relates also to, as you know, the headwinds we have in the delayed capacity utilization of our Chinese plant in Rechargeable Battery Materials. Overall, I would say that we have overreached our target. The second slide is meant to look at absolute values, because growth rates are important but sometimes you lose track of what it means in absolute values. You'll hear a lot of us talking about transformation. This is a transformational strategy. I just want to highlight actually between 2015 and 2021, this company, this group already went through an important transformation. We basically doubled the size of the group through different metrics, except for the number of colleagues, which increased by 26%. For the rest, you see revenues, EBITDA, even if you correct for the 2021 record metal prices, we have doubled this group. Capital employed, you know that part of that still has to fully yield its payback. But also from a market value perspective, we have increased enterprise value by about EUR 5 billion and approximately 90% was translated in shareholder value in market cap, corresponding to a 15% annual total shareholder return. Acknowledging that the last few years, we've seen quite a lot of volatility in our share price and clearly this is something we want to avoid as much as we can in our future strategy. You see a lot of balance in these numbers. Of course, if you look at the growth rates per different business section, you see that there's been a lot of balancing in the group, which is important as well to keep the equilibrium overall. Right. Let's look forward into the strategy. Before we do so, I need to talk about metal prices. I know this is a complicating factor also from a financial communication perspective but you know, this is who we are. This is what our business is, how we create value. We wanted to share with you the assumptions on metal prices that we have used. We still haven't found a crystal ball. However, we felt that particularly related to the precious metal prices, it was probably not appropriate to just say we take metal prices where they are today, given that today we're still pretty close to record peak levels. What we have assumed, again, we are positive you see that because especially for PGMs, there are some structural supply-demand tightness elements. You have the platinum, which will benefit from fuel cells. What we have assumed in this plan is a gradual normalization of PGM prices going forward. You see on the graph shows you the average historic precious metal prices and you see what we kind of composed as a sort of a consensus in the market. The message is that what we have assumed in our plan kind of follows that trend. If anything, it's probably a bit more conservative. The key takeaway for you is that the numbers I will show in a minute, therefore, do include quite a substantial headwind, earnings headwind, because of this normalization effect, particularly in recycling. Now, what will become much more important in the future, given the growth of rechargeable battery materials, is obviously the battery material metals and those prices. We expect some volatility, as we've seen in the last few years. Instead of trying to predict that volatility, we have assumed in the plan prices at the average level of 2021. Interesting as well is that most likely there will be kind of an interlink between precious metal prices, particularly PGM prices and these battery material prices related to the pace of electrification. electrification. Okay, now we're really going to look forward. What I want to say at the outset of the numbers is that we always have a bottom-up planning. That means that it's our business units that come with the plan. We think that's important from an internal ownership perspective, so this is not a corporate plan. Obviously, we link that up with our group value creation framework. That framework, I would like to explain a bit more in detail. We have structured it through three drivers. Earnings growth, defined as EBITDA growth, the return driver, which is we need to earn a return above our cost of capital defined by return on capital employed and thirdly, free cash flow, free operational cash flow generation. It's really the combination of these three, not the exclusivity of one or the other, that drives the value. What we would like to do is, first on the group level and then on the business unit levels, show how each of these drivers really add to the value creation. This is the group. Let's start with earnings growth. No surprise. I mean, that is on the high side because we, I mean, with our plan, we have attractive earnings growth driven mostly by, obviously, Rechargeable Battery Materials and then also, especially in the second half of the decade, Battery Recycling Solutions. Again, the caveat on the metal prices that will impact exactly the growth. As Frank mentioned, a very strong growth is the basis of this plan. Secondly and this is obviously related to returns, not isolated, is that we see in this plan our group returns above the cost of capital across the plan. Our cost of capital pre-tax, we have somewhat below 10%. That's our reference. You see that just like we've realized in the past that across this plan, despite the fact that we will have significant growth investments for the group, we see that return above the cost of capital. Lastly, free cash flow generation. Clearly, that's a more challenging one given the growth we have in RBM. That's why you see that it's relatively on the low contribution side. You see arrows. I should have explained that. The arrows mean is where we see the trend between 2026 and 2030. You clearly see that from a free cash flow perspective, we do see the payback also from Rechargeable Battery Materials but also from the battery recycling materials to see that in the second half of the decade, hence the trend. Also on the returns, you see that we do see between 26%-30% a further increase of the returns from the business. On free cash flow generation, if you and I will show that, look at Catalysis and Recycling, clearly there we have a lot of free cash flow. This is again the group perspective. A bit linking it to what Frank said, it's the combination of extremely high growth kind of startup growth. I would say seasoned startup, because we've been around for a long time. At the same time, combining it with return on capital employed, we're not leaving that metric. It's very important to us. A lot of free cash flow generation that we will invest in our growth businesses. Quantifying this in terms of the growth ambition, we have taken here for earnings EBITDA, because we feel that's really the KPI that probably best will track that path and is also from a market perspective, most used. This is where we start from, between 15%-21%, 18% growth. If we move to 2026, our ambition is to be at approximately EUR 1.5 billion EBITDA for the group. Again, this includes the normalization of PGM prices already in there. From a revenue perspective, we expect to have EUR 2.5-EUR 3 billion of revenue growth between 2021 and 2026. The way to read it is that by 2026, revenues are expected to be somewhere between EUR 6.5 billion and EUR 7 billion. At a margin, an EBITDA margin on group level above 20%. Metal prices. In our base numbers, we have a normalization of PGM prices. But just to show you the underlying growth, what we have also done and that's the shaded bubbles, is to give you the like for like if we would take precious metal prices at the average levels of 2020. Okay. This is just. For the rest, you don't have to pay too much attention but you see that underlying this, there is quite substantial growth, double-digit growth rate at 2020 levels. It also shows that the metal prices we have used in 2026 are below the average that was there in the market in 2020. Now let's look at 2030. The vision we have for 2030 is an acceleration on the top line, basically having the same increase in revenues between 2026 and 2030. That's four years compared to the previous five years and to maintain an EBITDA margin of above 20%. This growth, whether it's between 2026 and 2030 or 2021 and 2026, will not be linear. I think it's a bit of an obvious one but still important to mention because the businesses we serve are not linear because the metal prices are not linear. That's an important thing to note. Maybe the most important thing on this slide is at the bottom. That is phased growth conditional upon value creating returns from contracts. What it means is this growth will be phased. That also means the investments will be phased. Clearly, it only makes sense for us to go after this growth if we are, you know, convinced that we will have a return above and sufficiently above. Our cost of capital, not just in an Excel sheet in our offices but through the agreements we will reach with our customers. If we map the margins just from a historic perspective, you'll see that the margins we have on a group level in this plan are actually, let's say, close to the average levels we've seen over the last 10 years. Attractive margins, even including the normalized PGM prices which are at play here. Now we'll try to do the same thing for each of the business sections and so you can see also the synergies between them. Catalysis. Catalysis we see and we start this plan as a growth business. Bart will explain that. We're really convinced that there's a real opportunity to capture what we call an unprecedented value peak in Automotive Catalysts in this decade, especially in the first half of the decade. What we'll also do, clearly on the fuel cell side, is prepare for the growth acceleration in that business. We see that payback mostly in the second half of the decade, not because we're late but because of the market and then further increasing after 2030. You see the arrow, which I think is an obvious one, that is the internal combustion engine towards the end of the decade, moving out in terms of the mix and that obviously from a growth perspective will have an impact. Return driver. The catalysis business has consistently, with the exception of the COVID year, generated a return well above our cost of capital and in this plan, that is absolutely to continue. You see the arrow, we see that increasing towards 2030 because of a reduction in capital employed in automotive catalysts. Again, about fuel cells. The good thing about fuel cells is that the capital intensity is relatively limited. In terms of payback, we see the payback in fuel cells more towards the end of the decade. Again, nothing because of our position but because of the pace of growth in this market. Free operational cash flow. Clearly, Catalysis will be a very important high free cash flow driver. Again, Bart will explain that. Will transition its business model from a growth model to a free cash flow model. Not too early, not too late. If you look at Catalysis, it's very clear, I think, how Catalysis will contribute to the value creation, which is a return well above cost of capital, free cash flow which will fund our growth opportunities and then we're going to prepare for the growth in fuel cells to take over. Quantifying that in terms of growth, EBITDA, history last 5 years, 15% growth. You see again some of the metal price impact in that. The ambition for 2026 is to have an EBITDA of close to half a billion EUR in this business, which equates to mid-single digit growth rates. Again, if we plot metal prices onto this, again, like for like average 2020 metal prices, you see that the underlying growth is actually more closer to double-digit growth rates. Maintaining margins, you see that EBITDA margin of more than 20%, which is less than 21% but I think we all acknowledge that 21 from that perspective was a pretty exceptional year. If we put ourselves in 2030, we expect revenues to be somewhere between EUR 21 and EUR 26 level and with a margin which is comparable to 2026, so basically EBITDA margin above 20%. We've also put here the expected contribution of fuel cell catalyst as a percentage of the catalyst EBITDA. You see by 2030, that's less than 30%. That's a lot of money but catalyst is a big segment. The message is that there's really most of that, I would say, growth acceleration in fuel cells, we expect to see after this decade, after 2030. E&ST, Energy & Surface Technologies. Growth, that's an obvious one. Unprecedented transformational growth in rechargeable battery materials. By the way, not just to 2030 but beyond because of the revolution that is happening. Important return driver, looking at E&ST and RBM. Because we have a concentration of investments in this plan, basically running up to 2026, think about the expansion of the footprint in Europe, the North American side, which is included in this plan. It does mean that if we take the picture in terms of return, ROCE versus capital, cost of capital, that in 2026, we expect E&ST to be somewhat below that hurdle rate. You see the arrow, that is the payback of that is in the second half of the decade and shortly after 2026, we do see E&ST going to value creative territory from that perspective. Free operating cash flow, also quite obvious. The first part of the decade will be a lot about funding, so we will have a negative free operating cash flow in E&ST. The arrow shows that the payback is expected more in the second half of that decade. Quantifying it, 50% growth the last five years. 2026, the ambition is to have an EBITDA somewhere between EUR 0.6 billion-EUR 0.8 billion. Clearly, there's a bit more range here because of the dynamics in this market. You see that in terms of revenues, we expect to add something like EUR 2.5 billion-EUR 3 billion from 2021, which gives a margin somewhat below 20% EBITDA. Why is that? Because also in that period, we'll have quite a lot of startup, ramp-up, growth costs, basically that are not fully paid off by 2026 because a lot of these investments will start to yield around that time and that you will see coming through in 2030 because there we see margins higher than we have in 2026. We do see in terms of growth, top line growth, again, an acceleration because of a short period of time, we expect to have more earnings growth. Again, please mind the bottom comment. It's phased growth conditional upon value creative agreements. We don't have a lot of time to almost no time to talk about the other businesses than Rechargeable Battery Materials. There's some real jewels in there. The message is they'll continue to do very well with margins above 20% and to capture their the growth opportunities in their respective markets. Recycling, to finish off. In terms of growth, recycling is really two tails. On the one hand, you have the PMR business, if I can simplify it, which will obviously come off from its peak earnings from 2021 because we have assumed to go back to normalized precious metal price. It doesn't mean there is no growth in PMR. I mean, Denis will explain that but the effect of metal prices is there. On the other hand, you see battery recycling coming through. Kurt will explain that, especially in the second half of the year. How do you map that on this graph? Normalizing PGM prices, which again is our assumption, you have obviously, in terms of growth, that is a headwind. If you would take stable metal prices, you will see that looks different. Then you have battery recycling, where we will have the, in the plan, we have the first industrial scale plant to be commissioned by 2026 of 150,000 tons with the payback clearly in the second half of the decade and then further growth beyond. Return driver. Recycling, irrespective of the investments in battery recycling, is a business that will continue to generate returns well above the cost of capital. You see the arrow from 2026 to 2030 a bit moving to the middle. That is just, I would say, some dilutive effect from an accounting perspective because we will have the investment in battery recycling. And obviously, we also have the impact of the PGM prices normalizing, continue to normalize after 2026. Nothing structural. Free operating cash flow. Again, recycling will be next to catalysis, a very strong free cash flow generator, which we intend to reinvest in our growth businesses. Quantifying recycling. You see the peak, again, driven by metal prices. We expect this business in 2026 to have an EBITDA of close to half a billion EUR with the revenues of more than EUR 1 billion, which implies an EBITDA margin of more than 50%, more than 40%, sorry. If we, again, do the like for like to show you the underlying growth that is in that business based on average 2020 metal prices, you see the shaded bubbles. We have actually a high single-digit growth rate. 2030, approximately the same kind of revenues and that's really the effect of these metal prices continue to play. EBITDA margin is somewhat below 40%, so very healthy margins. If you look at the absolute level of EBITDA and you put that on a historic perspective, you see that we're well above the historic earnings. You see there battery recycling in percent of adjusted EBITDA for the segment. We wanted to also show that. You see by 2030, it's already more than 30%. There is more growth opportunity than we have put in this plan in battery recycling. We feel this is, you know, to start from a realistic view and clearly after 2030 but Kurt will explain that, there's much more growth opportunities ahead of us. Right. An important slide, investments. What have we, just as a recap, invested in the period 2015-2021? EUR 2.8 billion. And you see most of that went to the E&ST business to basically the expansion in Rechargeable Battery Materials. But also quite a lot still in Catalysis to capture the growth in that market. We expect to see CapEx, based on the ambition we have in the plan between 2022-2026, to be at EUR 5 billion. And you see that the split is different. We have a significantly higher portion in E&ST, which is again the increase in footprint in Europe, the North American plant, which is all in there. You see that Catalysis is substantially lower. That's the free cash flow kicking in and that will accelerate again after 2026. You see the green part remains quite important and that includes the investment in the industrial plant in battery recycling, which accounts for about EUR half a billion in the total. RBM, the expansion of RBM, is approximately EUR 4 billion of the more than EUR 5 billion. Which means that if you look at the three most important growth engines of the group, which is fuel cells, rechargeable battery materials and battery recycling, together in terms of CapEx, they account for more than 75% of the group CapEx. What is very important on this slide, in terms of interpreting it, is discipline. This is very big amount. First of all, this CapEx will not be spent in one go. It's a phased investment plan, which means that there's a number of decision points along the way. Secondly, you know our commitment to returns. We will only spend this money if we have enough visibility on having a return above, sufficiently above our cost of capital. Thirdly, what I think is really strategic and unique is the partnership model that was already referenced earlier on in rechargeable battery materials. You do not spend EUR 5 billion based on annual contracts. I think this is really predicated on the traction we see with customers with ongoing discussions to have a true partnership with our customers, to have also a co-funding aspect into that. I think the word of discipline needs to be with this slide and definitely is in the ambitions we have going forward. In terms of capital allocation, what it means is that we have between 15 and 21, again, already doubled the capital and the size of the group. If we put ourselves in 2026, we are expected to close to double again. You see the relative sizes are different. The main driver behind this close to doubling is obviously Rechargeable Battery Materials and battery recycling. In Catalysis, we expect to see a stable capital base up until 2026 because there's still growth to be captured. We have the investments also in fuel cells. Towards the second half of the decade, we should see a substantial reduction in the capital base in Catalysis, partly also because of substantial working capital releases. E&ST will grow to something like two-thirds of the total group average capital employed base, obviously driven by the RBM expansion. In Recycling, you see that it's going up. This is the investments we have in battery recycling, the EUR half a billion which is to come on stream in 2026, in addition to some ESG investments in Hoboken. 2030, further growth without any doubt because of the growth opportunity. However, not in every segment. In E&ST, that's the growth we expect to be able to capture, continue to capture in Rechargeable Battery Materials. Again, for Catalysis, we see that going down. For Recycling, it will really depend on the ambition we put in after 2026 in battery recycling. Capital allocation shift will accelerate, so we need to talk about returns. Let's start with Catalysis. This is the historic view on top of the return on capital employed of the Catalysis business. You see it been consistently, with the exception of 2020, creating a lot of value. We expect that absolutely to continue. In 2026, the ambition is to be approximately at 20% and to further grow that in the second half of the decade because of a decrease in the capital employed base. E&ST. We expect E&ST, again, because of the concentration of investments between now and 2026, based on the caveat that the returns in the agreements are there, to be at something like 8% return on capital employed in 2026, with the payback coming in the years thereafter in the second half of the decade, so that the ambition is by 2030 that we are above the 12.5%. Recycling continues to be well above cost of capital. 2026, 30%. Again, the normalization of metal prices is in there. 2030, something like 20%, well above our cost of capital, so well into value creative territory, despite the price assumption. Which means that for the group, across the plan, the group is expected to be in value creative territory, to have a return on capital employed above, our cost of capital, well above our cost of capital and to go to 15% by 2030. Cash flows. In the period 2022-2026, the plan foresees a total EBITDA generation of something like EUR 6 billion-EUR 7 billion. We draw your attention to the quite balanced distribution here between the three segments. That will change in the second half of the decade, clearly with E&ST becoming much more important. If we put next to that the investment we foresee in the plan in CapEx, in working capital, also taking into account again the metal prices, what is happening in Catalysis, we expect to have roughly the same amount of investments, if I can put it, in that first part of the decade, which means that we have a very strong free cash flow generation in Catalysis and in Recycling, irrespective of the investment, for example, in battery recycling. We intend to fully utilize that to fund our growth projects and mainly to fund the growth in rechargeable battery materials. Again, conditional upon the returns, obviously. With these numbers, funding is very important. We start with a strong balance sheet. You know, we been along for a very long time, so we understand the importance of a strong balance sheet, you know, the volatility that we have in our markets. The third thing to mention that in this plan, our funding policy remains unchanged in the sense that we want to maintain investment grade status across the plan. We believe that we have a much more diversified funding opportunity and funding levers to pull than maybe in the past. First of all, on the free cash flow perspective, I just showed you that the generation of free cash flow from our different businesses and especially in Catalysis and Recycling, is much more significant than in the past, so that will contribute. Secondly, there's clearly a lot of appetite to fund sustainable ESG projects running into transition of the energy market, electrification. We feel if there's any company that ticks a lot of those boxes with our projects that we have, whether it's in battery recycling or in rechargeable battery materials, that we want to capture that. Very important and I think really strategic is the co-funding, the partnership model in rechargeable battery materials. That's the traction we feel with customers is that they are willing to participate in the funding in return for the capacity commitment, the technology commitment. That can take the form of joint ventures like the MOU we have with Volkswagen or different other forms of, I would say, co-funding partnerships. Finally, we have grants incentive mechanisms. I mean, the growth that we have had in this business requires support and does receive support from governments and other agencies. Clearly that is going to be an important source of funding as well for us. We have, I would say, the optional one. We're a listed company. We always have the option to go for capital market funding in different forms. Conditional obviously on the fact that it's a good proposition from a business and from a return perspective. Again, that is optional. It's really the other levers and the different levers we have that we intend to pull to the fullest extent. With that and before going to the Q&A, I hope going back to the initial title of the section, we covered everything and hope that we have convinced you that we're really looking to balance the growth, the returns, the cash flows with a focus on value creation of this company. Not on the short term but on the medium and the long term. Thank you. Thank you, Filip. You can stay on stage. Okay. Then I will ask Frank and Mathias to also join you. We will open the floor for questions. Here, we don't need a microphone in the room but we do need it for the people following online. When you have a question, raise your hand and then either me or my colleague in the back will bring the microphone your way. For the people who have raised questions online, please continue to do so. I saw there were already some questions on sessions that we will be hosting this afternoon, so I will park these questions and I see some people laughing here in the audience. Please keep your questions on Rechargeable Battery Materials and the other businesses for this afternoon. We are ready for the first question. Thanks very much. Gunther Zechmann from Bernstein. If I can just start with two, please. You speak about uninterrupted value creation. Can you just outline for us, please, what that means for ROCE progression between now and your 2026 ambition and also when is trough ROCE in your projections? And then secondly, just a clarification point, Filip Platteeuw, on your last slide about the funding of the investment. You speak about the optionality of capital markets funding. Can you just clarify whether you're talking about debt capital markets or also potentially equity capital markets, please? Yep. Sure. Two financial questions. On the first question, what we mean is that in the plan, we see our return on capital employed on the group level being above our cost of capital, basically above 12.5%. What you see happening is that there's still a dilution in E&ST, because of the investment, so that will continue. You see the other businesses making up for that, despite even the metal price assumption, the investments in battery recycling. It means that across the plan on a group level, we have a return above 12.5%. That we see increasing then in the second half of the decade once RBM comes on stream and will by itself also go 12.5%. That, on a group level, your return in the plan goes to 15%, if that clarifies. The cost of capital you put at 12.5%? No. The cost of capital pre-tax is somewhat below 10%. That's what we have assumed. The return on capital employed in the plan is above 12.5% across the plan on group level with the dilution still in E&ST and increases to 15% based upon the payback in the second half of the decade in Rechargeable Battery Materials. Is that clear? Yes. On the funding, please? On the funding, indeed, it's capital markets. So it means it can be, yeah, equity side, it can be, debt side. Indeed, there's quite a lot of instruments available to us. Again, this is the optional. I think we don't want to. You know, we really want to focus on pulling all the levers, the good levers we have. We're listed, so it is a certain optionality but it can be different forms indeed. It doesn't have to be an equity raise or. Thank you. Good morning. Sebastian Bray of Berenberg Bank. Could I ask about the definition of EBITDA being consolidated and potentially the impact of the co-funding arrangements? Because my understanding of what happens with Volkswagen is that there's a 50/50 sales and EBIT joint venture. If it turns out that partners step in to fund a large amount of the EUR 5 billion CapEx guided, is there the chance that they actually are allocated some of the EBITDA that you've been talking about in the slides, in the sense that if they say, "Okay, we put up EUR 2.5 billion or however much it is, therefore we get 50% of the EBITDA that's shown on a fully consolidated basis," or am I interpreting this wrong? Yeah. If I get your question right, then my answer would be that, because indeed there is certain uncertainty in terms of the accounting treatments. What we have done here for the plan, just to simplify it, is kind of apply a look-through, if you can call it. If there would be 50/50, whatever, it would be proportional. We kind of presented things in a proportional way, because I think that's the economic reality behind that. Then what the actual accounting metrics would be, that is too early to tell. That will depend on the ongoing negotiations and maybe future partnerships. Again, partnership does not only mean joint ventures, it can be other forms as well. In the numbers, we've kind of applied a look-through, from that perspective. It's not 100% of the EBITDA that you expect to come from. No, no. It's just a proportional. The Umicore, I would say, part is included, yeah. Is the EUR 5 billion the Umicore part of the CapEx or? Exactly. That is the same approach. That is what we need to fund as Umicore. Yeah. Just to clarify, the total CapEx and the EBITDA that would be associated with the totality of the projects in which Umicore is involved would be higher than what is shown on the slides as a result? That would be higher. Sorry, then two quick follow-up questions. The free cash flow target for autocatalysts, is that pre-tax, pre-interest, pre-adjustments? Secondly, the gigawatt hours that Mathias showed in his earlier presentation, is that capacity or production on a historical basis? This is capacity. It's capacity. It is capacity. Thank you. We have, you know, Ralph will give a more in-depth view on that capacity ramp-up as well. Hi, this is Riya Kotecha from Bank of America. I have two initial questions, please. First, I'd like to understand the decision and your rationale for ramping up sort of investments four times versus your historical CapEx in the RBM space. Was it from a perspective of increasing competition where you have sort of Asian players coming into the European market and your need to sort of defend market share? Or is it from the demand side where you're getting OEMs really coming to you and sort of asking for volumes or offtakes? And then related to that, you mentioned that strong contracts underpin through your value creation and growth prospects. In 2018 when you raised capital to fund you know the first expansion, you sort of guided that there would be contracts too. However, in December 2021, we saw that, you know, that wasn't the case and actually the contracts and orders were canceled. It's not a massive blow-up, well, increase in CapEx somewhat more of a risky approach? Or how are you able to sort of secure those volumes? Thanks. Yeah, very good question indeed. What we have done here in the plan forward in terms of capacities and then underlying CapEx for the E&ST is a bottom-up approach. It's exactly what the customers and mainly, the OEM customers but also the cell customers, tell us what is their need in the different regions. We have not been doing that from a top-down view in terms of we had a certain market share assumption in mind and that's why we need to do it. It's a bottom-up approach and that's very much linked to your second question as well. What is different to previous announcement of that kind? The contracts we talk about have much more skin in the game, if you want, with the counterparts. When we, in the extreme case, if we talk about a 50/50 joint venture with a customer. The customer has as much skin in the game as Umicore and this is a much stronger, you know, first of all bond but secondly, also a securitization of, if you want market share or offtake. Okay, thanks very much. I just have one quick follow-up. I understand from the volume perspective that perhaps you're able to secure that but how are you thinking about it from the pricing perspective? Is that something you're able to lock in? How do you see the trajectory l ocking across the decade then? Yeah, that's also a very good question because we had not so much now but maybe six months ago, there was a debate if Ralph will address it in detail. Is the cathode active material market a commodity market with low returns and low prices and a price pressure that the OEMs traditionally apply to the tier one suppliers? Now, what I have tried to explain in the beginning is that there are several new points to this equation. Pain points that the OEMs need to solve, availability of materials, the ESG constraint, circularity, Nolens mentioned. What we currently see is that companies that can solve these points, they can achieve a premium also on pricing. You know, this is not an assumption, it's the reality we see. I'm personally involved in some of the discussions, of course, because of the magnitude of that kind of agreements. I would say we are quite confident that the agreements we are doing and that's what Filip said many times, those significant CapEx are conditional to those agreements. With that, a question about risk, I think we have a quite good feeling that we can secure the risk with these agreements in a good way. Now we have to prioritize this section because we have been so much over there already. Hi, it's Jean-Baptiste Rolland from Credit Suisse. Thank you for taking my question. I wanted to ask you what has changed versus 2018 for you to decide, as it sounds, use equity as last resort whilst your primary funding strategy versus in 2018 was to resort to a capital raise? That's my first question. The second one is, in relation to the CapEx that you're talking about, if you are going to share the CapEx, I'm wondering how will your returns be split? Because logically, if you take less risk, your returns may be compressed. Otherwise, it's not clear to me what would be the interest of your customers to have a skin in the game in the JV. Appreciate if you could elaborate on that. I will take the second question if you take the first one, because I wasn't here in 2018 yet. No, indeed. I think what changed is that. You know, everything that was on the left-hand side of the slide is substantially different than what we had in 2018. If you look at the free cash flow generation, I mean, explain that. The businesses are changing now. Catalysis then was still very much in investment phase. Now it's really transitioning to a free cash flow model. I mean, Recycling, we have clearly more free cash flows there as well. It's really, I would say and you have the markets in terms of the support for electrification clearly there and the appetite from an ESG perspective. Those are also things that were not yet there in 2018. Probably the most significant one is the one in the middle, that this partnership model and we did not have that in 2018. You refer to it, we had contracts. What we're talking about now is something quite fundamentally different. The skin in the game, the real joint interest and Mathias can tell you that. I think it's the mix of funding instruments is quite different than what we had in 2018. Coming to the second point, isn't that a dilutive factor for us if we you know have less burden on the financing because the customers co-financing, they want something back from it. I think it's even. It's true, they want something back but it's not so much that they want something back which is financially. They want security of supply. They want to have access to our circularity business model. They want to have access to our sustainability roadmap that we can offer to them. That's kind of the premium that we can unlock and it's really counterbalancing your perception that the market had a couple of months ago, that this is purely a commodity play where the more you produce on a low scale, this will be a winning trajectory. No, it will not be. It will be to secure the customers. You can believe me, in the discussions we have with all of our automotive customers, this topic of how to secure the supply chain is dealt with at CEO level or at management board level of the big OEMs. It's such an importance. To secure that, they're willing to go in these kind of partnerships without a dilution of premiums on our side, because we can bring a lot of the solutions to their problems. Even at the start, when I had my slide at the beginning, I said we have to embrace more this ecosystem approach as Umicore but as a point we need to work on. Because traditionally, Umicore was not willing or open to these kind of partnerships, right? It was not necessary at a certain point in time and it was more protective mechanism. Now, as we have shown the willingness to open up, which was not the case in the past, this is really appreciated by our customers. Thank you. It's Nicola Tang from BNP Paribas. I wanted to clarify on the CapEx, specifically talking about North America and RBM. What is factored into that number? You know, is it this sort of co-funding agreement? I was just wondering that if actually a co-funding agreement doesn't materialize, is there a risk that the CapEx could be higher for North America specifically? The second question is thinking about sort of OpEx more than CapEx. You know, as you talk about that scale-up, how have you thought about the need for more OpEx potentially in those growth businesses against the reduction in fixed costs in the Catalysis side? Yeah, that's a very good point. The North America expansion is today factored in as a Umicore standalone activity. We of course have included other elements of the chart. The, you know, the, how you call it? Your last column, the funding, public funding opportunities that are available. But it's a Umicore finance, so it's included in that envelope. If we would find co-funding opportunities, which we are not excluding at this point in time, it would be an upside to that number. Now the question of OpEx. You see that in our RISE strategy, the last one is E, excellence in execution. This is exactly addressing two things. It's to keep the promise to our customer that we can deliver the promise we give to them in terms of. Yes, we will put the capacities in place but also it takes care of the operational excellence and the OpEx side of things. You will see later in the presentation of Ralph and in all of the presentations but especially in Ralph, we look at this, is how can we, by not only, you know, every time we build a new plant for cathode material to invent it new but to build a standardized manufacturing system with a standardized layouts in the plants, standardized operating models. We take the lessons learned and the improvements we have done in other factories from the beginning to have a lower starting point in OpEx for the new activities. In automotive catalyst, of course, this has been a long tradition, being exposed to the automotive OEMs. That's a reflex to, you know, every year go down with your operation costs. Now, on the last topic on recycling, you know, precious metal recycling is under, if you want, pressure in a certain way by normalizing PGM prices. So also there, we're not starting now. It's already a journey that has happened. It started two years ago to work on further improvements of the logistic flows in our Hoboken plant, for example, to reduce the cost that we have in internal handling, et cetera. All that we can do to influence also the OpEx cost. Again, here with battery recycling, we already start on the lessons learned that we've taken away. We made the math on the cost development and we see that we have quite a good plan to reduce also OpEx over time and not have the OpEx, you know, leave it out of the equation because we believe growth will be so much we don't have to care about that. No, it's from the beginning, very tightly managed. Hi. Farzad Limki, Millennium Management. Just a couple of questions. One is on your margin headwinds, so in terms of percentage. Could you just tell us how much could be allocated to normalizing PGM prices until 2026? And how much could you allocate to, you know, underutilization costs because of the ramp up of the CapEx? Difficult to really quantify but I would say starting last year with 2021, we quantified the exceptional, I would say, tailwind from record precious metal prices at EUR 270 million on the group level. As you see in the shaded bubbles in 2020, that's basically the difference that is shown. That gives you an idea of the orders of magnitude if you bring that down. I would say in recycling the dilution you see is basically that with the exception of return on capital employed, because there we have the capital employed from battery recycling. If you take 2026 and recycling, that is metal prices. That continues then into 2030. For catalysis, that is also partly at play but I would say less important. The other side of the equation, which are the start-up costs, the investments, et cetera, that is really concentrated in E&ST. I would say if you talk about dilution, that's in E&ST. There is some obviously also in Battery Recycling and Recycling but in the overall scheme of things, that is the dilution effect in E&ST. The metal prices are mostly in Recycling and somewhat in Catalysis. To really pull it apart is not as straightforward, yeah. On the contracts for E&ST, you mentioned it's gonna be multiple years. I guess the suggestion is not gonna be sort of one-year contracts. Could you just give us an idea on when you need to secure these contracts before which you start hitting the ground in terms of CapEx, et cetera and so on? Could you just give us an idea? Right. This is an extremely good question because you've seen that we have put the phase that we're currently in now, 2021, 2022, 2023, as the key phase of change in the market where we can utilize our value proposition. I think this is exactly the time. It's this year and next year where we will secure this contract to be ready to be ramped up with the ambitious plans that we have going forward. I'm confident that we can, over the course of this year already and then beginning of next year, share more about that step by step as we go down the road. Now, if you want to quantify it in a time horizon, then you could say, the pure length of a project, you can say it's two and a half years. Two and a half years from we decide to do it and it's operational. Now, as we have said, we have a staged approach. That does not mean at the moment we decide to do an investment or to do a capacity expansion that we need to put the investment. There is a significant amount of engineering that you do before and that takes you know, a very good time during which you could still say, "No, I stop," and you have not spent a lot of money. The real CapEx investment is coming much more closer to the step-up. One part of course of our, if you want risk management model for the whole equation is also to have very frequent gateways to check on the assumptions that we did when we have launched those projects, if they are still in place or if they need to be adjusted. Because as we said, we have one threshold that we will not pass, which is value creation for the investments. One last question, which is in terms of return on investment, what sort of pricing are you assuming going forward? Because up till now, we've, I mean, seen one major exit from the industry. I am sure it will lead to the game. In the past, we've seen a lot of value being eroded because of pricing. What's changed now that you're confident that you can put in EUR 5 billion of CapEx gain that? Absolutely. And that's a kind of a repetitive question that we have also asked ourselves a lot when developing the strategy. The answer to it is that, of course, there is an element of. The price will go down if the market demand is increasing because you have more production, more players on the market, et cetera. That's a general, you know, that's a law of the industry. In this specific case, this industry works as we see now in the last six months or 12 months, a little bit different because it's not only to be able to buy something on the spot market, it's to secure supply, sustainable supply that has a circularity, meets the circularity requirement. There are not so many options the market can go in this full attempt. What we have tried to say in the beginning and we will through the course of the day give you more examples of what are the reasons on the different pain points of our customers, why we can achieve a premium versus just the underlying raw market dynamics. For us, a proof of concept of that is those agreements we do with customers that go beyond a pure one-year short-term spot. I think this, we will not see this at all into the future. It will be always long-term, it will be secured, it will be skin in the game and it will be based on a value proposition that is more than just the production of bulk material. Hi, Geoff Haire from UBS. I've got a couple of questions. I was just wondering in terms of the you offer a circularity within battery materials, there's obviously a few other companies that are starting to do that who probably have d eeper financial pockets than Umicore does and may not need partnership. Why would the OEMs want to be spending their own money whenever they don't with other players who offer the same, offer? Filip, I was wondering if you could give us some idea of where you think maximum leverage for the group would be, where you feel comfortable with that on the investment grid. Then just on the Volkswagen joint venture, can you confirm whether that's signed up and completed? If not, will you come back to give us financial details once it is? Thank you. I will take the first and the last question and the middle, maybe I answer both of them first. Battery recycling, I don't want to steal the thunder of Kurt later but what we have today is a technology that is, as we think, superior in the market in terms of ability to pay, so means the cost side of things but as well in terms of an ESG perspective, the CO₂ footprint of the activities. That's already one of the reasons why but not only OEMs and cell makers are interested to be part of our ecosystem. The second part of this, because we have decades of experience in that field, in recycling in itself and in lithium-ion battery recycling since 10 years. We think we know what we talk about and our customers see that as well. The last thing is that for us or let's say the winning model cannot be to separate cathode active material manufacturing and battery recycling. Why? Because the requirement of the output of battery recycling needs to be battery-grade material. You need to understand what is battery-grade material and you have the ability to close the loop. On the other hand, the input streams that you will have for battery recycling will be so diverse, so you get different stuff that you have to recycle and Kurt will focus on that, so that your technology has to be able to convert a very broad stream of input into something that is very, very narrow, which is battery-grade material. I think this combination between our know-how in CAM production and the long recycling activities is very attractive for our customers. Kurt, again, will go in much more detail on that. We will show you a benchmark of technologies that we have done a study on the market that probably will speak for itself. Here's a question. Maybe just on the. Yeah. Oh, sorry. Yeah. Average question, Geoff. I wouldn't want to put a straight number on it but investment-grade, typically, you know, is some, I would say 2.5-3 times. I think the interpretation of that will depend also on the underlying business, on the contracts, on, say, the risk appreciation of what is in that funding. You know, that's, I think, what is investment grade. Right. Coming back to Volkswagen topic. Today, we have not closed that activity yet. I can tell you that we are well on track versus what we have communicated earlier, the timelines we had in place. It was just a matter of when we have positioned this capital market day versus our timeline that we have agreed. It's a little bit early. Would have been great if we would be able to share more. I can only give you so much confidence that we are, you know, on the milestones that we have set ourself with our partner, we are on track. As soon as it is signed and announced, we will give you more details now, of course, more details than today. What is that level of detail will also depend on the agreement we have with our partner in this regard but it will be more than today. Yeah, we should have this cycle but we will keep you covered. Yes. Good morning. Stijn Demeester, ING. Two questions. First one is, maybe clarification on capital employed. Does the old rule still apply that EUR 1 of CapEx equals EUR 1 of working capital investment? Is that included in your definition of capital employed? The second question is on CapEx intensity. Can you talk about how you see that CapEx per gigawatt hour for North America versus past expansions in Asia and in Europe as has that fundamentally changed over time or geographically? I will take it. I will take the second one and if you can, go for the first. Yeah, on the first one, our capital employed includes working capital. That's, I would say indeed an obvious one. That rule does not apply as a rule anymore. That's the thing with once you give that guidance, it's valid for a certain point in time and that was for RBM, right? This was only for RBM. You know, recycling, we have a model which is very light in working capital and we think, for example, battery materials. Battery recycling should be something similar in terms of business model. It does not, as such, apply as a rule because when we talk about partnerships. It covers the supply chain, so it's not just limited to the investments in the CapEx. It can be also on raw material sourcing. No, that rule does no longer apply. In any case also, it's dependent on the underlying metal prices, so that's the thing with once you give a rule, there's so many factors into that. No, I would not apply that rule anymore. What you've seen in the numbers is when you take CapEx and working capital together for the group, we're at EUR 6 billion-EUR 7 billion. That gives you an indication, let's say, of the relative proportion of CapEx versus working capital. Also, don't forget that working capital in Catalysis and in Recycling is subject to metal prices and the model that we have in Catalysis going forward is a free cash flow model. Clearly also there will be a release of working capital just from that factor. There's quite a number of moving parts into that guidance. To answer to your second question, we will have these two gentlemen because they were already raising their hand for a long time. I think we don't have a lot of time for more questions. Yes, the CapEx density in North America will be lower than previously but it's nothing to do with North America. It's the progression of our developments and Ralph will explain that also with our standardized model of cathode manufacturing plants that we will then not reinvent in North America but we will already use. You know, we have several steps of investments planned. We will already use an advanced step of that implemented as a baseline in North America, which will, you know, compared to an average in the group, will be lower than that. We have more details in the presentation. Let's have the two last questions over there. Thanks. Charles Bentley, Jefferies. If I take the 2030 targets, assume EUR 6 billion of incremental revenue, 20% EBITDA margins and then assume the incremental investment, I get to EBIT lower or perhaps equal to 2021. Would you agree with that? And then secondly, just a couple on cathode materials. How many players do you think this market can hold? If I take something like a 3 terawatt hour market by 2030, assume a third of that's LFP, it gets you to something like a 20% market share. Do you think that's realistic? And then also just a point of clarification on the conversion that you're using for gigawatt hours to kilotons for these periods. That would be really helpful. Kind of finally, sorry, on CapEx, the slide says greater than EUR 5 billion. Is that? Says EUR 5 billion the floor and it could be higher. How could it be materially higher? Kind of just any kind of views on that. Thank you. Do you wanna start? Yeah, I can start. Sorry, because I now forgot your first question. The first question was EBIT equation. EBIT 2030. Yeah, EBIT equation. Sorry for that. Look, just give me depreciation 2026, around EUR half a billion. I think that's what I would give today as a guidance. Again, it's a plan which means that we said EUR 1.5 billion of EBITDA, EUR half a billion of D&A. You get to something which is similar, slightly above what we had in 2021. That would be in the plan. Then in 2030, definitely higher. Higher EBIT numbers. No, there is EBIT growth in the plan, I would say obviously, for 2030. Yeah. Coming back to your market, the question of how many players can this market digest? I have to admire the model that you have calculated our market share because it's pretty well aligned with what we see ourselves. We think this is a realistic value. You could, you know, you could project yourself into a much higher market share from the market growth and the potential that you have. It is a selective strategy forward. We have selected several regions, first of all and then several value propositions that we have or market segments, so LFP, for example, not others, where we say there is a very big chance for us to win at attractive margins. If you add all this up, bottom up, you come to something close to 20%. We think that the overall market is absolutely able to digest it. There will be different segments and Ralph will come to that as well. Remind me of your last question. Just on CapEx greater than EUR 5 billion. Oh, yeah. Yeah. It means what it says but I mean, it's somewhat above EUR 5 billion, so we're not. Otherwise, we would have used a different metric on the slides. Sorry, gigawatt hours, kilotons? I want to put this to Ralph's presentation to answer in his Q&A because it's not so straightforward. There's not one value. It's my point. There are several values. I promise it's the last question. Thank you. Ranulf Orr for Citi. I'll just keep it to one. So, could you just help understand, you know, what proportion, you know, going forward of the 2026 and the 2030, capacity volumes are actually covered by contracts that you consider skin in the game? Kinda clarify what that actually means with your customers. Is that co-investment? You know, how much will be take or pay contracts and the like? Thank you. Yeah. That's a good question. I would like to answer it in the following way. If you just look to our ambition that we have for 2030, we say more than 400 GWh of capacity. If you look to you mirror to that the ambitions that we have communicated with the partners that we have already been, you know, announcing to be partnering, you are already around 50% of the 2030 value. That's, as we think, a quite strong value. The other portion that I want to say, we have said earlier this year that the year 2022 is the year where we are progressing very successfully on advanced qualifications. At the time, we said high nickel. It was more focused on the high nickel questions but advanced qualifications with several customers. After we have set that, the first one that we have announced was ACC and I can tell you there's several more in the queue and they will then after or starting in 2024 to ramp up towards 2026. Then we have this 50% that you can take into account as ambitions from our partners in 2030. Thank you. I'm afraid we will have to wrap up this Q&A session. For the people who asked questions online, we will come back to you at a later time and please continue to raise your questions. We have a bit more than a 15-minute break before we continue with the rest of the presentations. Thank you. Thank you. Good morning, everybody. I hope you enjoyed your break and that you're ready for the second part of our presentations. Also good morning to everybody online. One year ago, we presented to you our Let's go for Zero ambitions and I'm really excited to be here today and talk to you about what we're doing and what we will be doing in the years to come. I hope that by the end of my presentation, you will be as convinced as me that ESG is really an important factor in the commercial success of Umicore. Now, let me maybe start by reassuring you. The ESG presentation is the only one and I'm ticking, is the only one where we will be striving for zero. I'm not a bomb, so it's just the tick tick of this thing. We're the only ones striving for zero. In all the other presentations, my colleagues will be striving for a whole different set of numbers, so no concerns there. Let's talk ESG. Now, Mathias and Frank have already introduced to you the RISE pillars and the cool thing about RISE is that it spells out literally how we are going to realize our strategy and the how is as important as the strategy is itself. I should stop, apparently, for a second. As I said, the RISE is the way how we're going to realize our strategy and that is as important as the strategy itself. The S in RISE stands for sustainability champion. Being a sustainability champion encompasses our Let's go for Zero strategy. That really means that Let's go for Zero is embedded in Umicore 2030 RISE strategy. Now, sustainability really is at the core of Umicore's DNA. It's what we've been doing for many, many years. It's in our products, it's in our services and more importantly, it is in how we do things, how we run our operations. I have to admit that maybe in the past, we have not always been immediately seeing returns for the efforts we've been doing on ESG. Things have changed in the past years. ESG has come much more to the forefront of things. It's become much more broad and as a result, our customers are looking for a true ESG partner. They're looking for suppliers that can help them realize their ESG ambitions. When we discuss with customers, they don't only talk to us anymore about financial terms or about volumes or even technology. They also ask us about our carbon footprint and they ask us about whether we're sourcing our raw materials in a responsible way. These are topics that are very important to them. They even say, you know, "We're approaching you exactly because you can differentiate yourself from many of the other players on the market from an ESG perspective." I think that makes it very clear that ESG is an important factor in the success of Umicore. Now, if we talk about our Let's Go for Zero strategy and ambitions, there is three pillars that we're really focusing on. The first pillar is our zero inequality pillar. The second one is zero harm. The third one is zero greenhouse gas emissions. Now, I would like to focus today with you on the third pillar, zero greenhouse gas emissions. Now, if you have any questions on either of the other two pillars, please feel free to ask me, of course and I'd be happy to answer your questions. Zero greenhouse gas emissions, it's really a key element of how Umicore acts for climate. When we talk about climate and climate action, there's two broad considerations that need to be made. The first question is: how does climate impact Umicore? There we will be thinking about physical climate-related risk and transition-related risk. The second question is: how does Umicore impact climate? Here I'll be talking about eliminating our Scope 1 and 2 emissions and reducing our Scope 3 emissions. Now, let me just quickly jog your memory. Scope 1, those emissions that are generated through our processes. Scope 2, the emissions generated mostly through electricity. Scope 3, those that are generated in the value chain, both upstream and downstream. If we start with how does climate impact Umicore, it's very important if we wanna manage the risks that we understand what they are. If we look at Umicore, there's a number of things that we take into consideration. First of all, we have a very broad geographical footprint and we are present on many of the continents. Secondly, we have a very broad supplier base. Thirdly, many of our plants are very, very close to our customers. Taking all these elements into account, we realize that our physical risk is actually very limited. I know that when we're talking physical risk, the main concern out there is the availability of water. Let me quickly touch upon that, is that we have defined a water stewardship program where we have run the scenarios, we've assessed the risk and we have identified two plants which are located in a water-stressed area and have a relevant consumption. That's our plant in Hoboken, our Precious Metals Refining plant and our plant in Olen. We have local action plans for each of these plants. Let's focus more on the transition risk. I should really start by saying that this is the wrong word. Transition risk is not really what we should be talking about. I know that many companies and many industries have a transition risk as a result of global warming. Umicore, it would be much more accurate to talk about transition opportunities. Now, if we look at the composition of our portfolio, it's really very, very well chosen. We have recycling, we have catalysis, we have rechargeable battery materials, we have fuel cells and all of these activities are ideally positioned to tackle the challenges that society is facing today. The fact that we have been in sustainability for so many years has allowed us to build a reputation in sustainability and it has also allowed us to get a head start and have a competitive advantage compared to other players. Now, it's exam week in Belgium this week and one of my daughters was studying biology over the weekend and she was talking about symbiosis. It kinda came to me that actually there is some kind of a symbiosis between climate change and Umicore. As long as climate change is a concern, there is a place for Umicore to contribute to reduce climate change and this in a mutually beneficial way and irrespective of the speed of the transition to low carbon. That's very important. When we talk about being a sustainability champion, we're not only talking about being a sustainability champion in driving the transition to a lower carbon society through our products and our services. We're not only being a champion in driving the acceleration of the decarbonization of the value chain through how we do business but we're also a champion at seizing the opportunities that the transition is offering. We're also a champion at offering sustainable low carbon products and solutions to our customers, which they need in turn to realize their ESG ambitions. Maybe now let's turn to how Umicore impacts climate. Last year when we launched our Let's go for Zero, we talked to you about our Scope 1 and 2 ambitions and they're very, very ambitious goals. We said we want to be carbon neutral by 2035 and that's a lot earlier than many other companies out there. We take the responsibility now and we want, with respect to our 2030 strategy, we want to reduce our Scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% by 2030 and this compared to our 2019 baseline. Now, if we look at that baseline, we see that there was about 800,000 tons of Scope 1 and 2 and it's about equally divided between 1 and 2, a little bit more in 2 than in 1. Scope 1 is mostly generated by, for about 85% by our plants in Hoboken and in Olen. Our Scope 2 is mostly generated by the use of electricity and that's mostly the case for our rechargeable battery activities on a worldwide basis. Now, if we want to reach these very ambitious goals, we're banking mainly on two things. Our extreme strength and experience in R&D, in innovation, that's the I in RISE and our operational excellence, the E of RISE. We have defined a hierarchy of levers that we're going to be using to reach these ambitions. There's a hierarchy of three. First of all, we want to avoid the emissions. Now, if we can't avoid the emissions, then we need to replace the sources of the emissions. Only if we can't replace the sources and we can't avoid, if we can't design it out of our processes, then we will capture the emissions. Let's maybe start with the avoiding. Now, when we talk about avoiding emissions, the first thing that comes to mind is improving the efficiency of our electricity and heat. There it's about doing things better. It's an evolution. Our cogeneration plant in Olen, for instance, is a very, very good example of this. The second element, which is particularly important for us considering the growth that is ahead of us, that you've seen in the presentations of Mathias and Filip earlier today, it is that growth is carbon neutral and that's a very important one. You may recall the announcement we did not so long ago about our plant in Nysa. It's our cathode manufacturing plant in Nysa, Poland, which is going to be entirely carbon neutral when it starts up in a few weeks from now, both Scope 1 and Scope 2. Very, very important. The next one is if we can't avoid the emissions, then we have to replace the sources. Here our R&D department is working very hard on replacing the sources, like fossil fuel into biofuels and electric furnaces. This is actually more of, it's not only doing things better but it's also about doing things differently. It's more of a revolution than an evolution and it takes a little bit more time and we expect our R&D projects to come to fruition by the second half of the decade. The second point here is making sure that we generate renewable energy on-site and here we already have plenty of projects out there. We have a solar park, windmills in Shirwal in India, in Americana in Brazil, in Olen in Belgium, in Kobe in Japan. All over the world we're producing renewable energy on-site already. The third one is probably the most important one after the innovation. It is the long-term green PPAs. Again, if we look at our growth, this is super critical. We expect that our needs in electricity will quadruple by 2030. It's very important that we can source that electricity through green electricity. This will be the first one that comes up in the timeline. It's important also for our 2025 ambition of reducing by 20% at that time. We've already signed many green PPAs in Belgium, in Poland and you probably already know of those but also in Finland. That's a new one that we haven't announced yet. Our ambition is and we aim to be sourced 100% renewable in Europe by 2025 already. That's pretty big deal because if you think about it, our cathode manufacturing in Europe is gonna be entirely carbon neutral from a Scope 1 and 2 point of view. If you add to that the green PPA of our plant in Finland where we make precursor material, then you come to the fact that we will be able to offer the lowest carbon footprint material in Europe already in 2025. I think that the customers will really appreciate that. Ralph will go into much more details later today in his presentation as well. We've done the avoiding, we've done the replacing and if we really can't design it out of our processes, then the third thing that we can do is capture greenhouse gas emissions. Now, we already have experience with this and this through our nitrous oxide capture plant in Hoboken. Now, what do we do there? We capture the nitrous oxides from our processes and we transform them in nitric acids. Now, it's very important that you know that nitrous oxide is a very potent greenhouse gas. It is actually 300 times more harmful for global warming than carbon dioxide. Very important that we're able to capture that. Then typically for our closed loop model internally, we use that nitric acid and we use it in our precious metals refinery. Even if we would have too much of that, it can always be sold on the market. Through the process we can save 40,000 tons of carbon equivalent and we can valorize an otherwise wasted resource. A very, very nice project indeed. To our knowledge, we're the only one that can do that on an industrial scale. Now, the capture of CO2 is something that is still at the drawing table of our R&D department. They're working with organizations and institutions and again, we expect results by the second half of the decade. Now, maybe I've talked about Scope 1 and Scope 2 and now very importantly, Scope 3 and you've probably been waiting for that as well. Scope 3 is actually 10 times the amount of our Scope 1 and Scope 2 combined. It's 8.3 million tons. If you look at the growth that Mathias and Filip presented, if we do nothing about this Scope 3, it will more than double by 2030. Very important. If you look at the Scope 3, you see the biggest part is upstream, 7.3 million and a little bit downstream, 1 million. We're going to focus on the upstream. What's the biggest part in the upstream? It's the purchase of goods and services. It's more than 90% of that. The purchase of goods and services is what we will be focusing on. If you look at our 2019 baseline, about 34% of that Scope 3 came from our Rechargeable Battery Materials business and about 27% came from PGMs. With the growth, again, that will change. More than half will originate from our battery materials activities, so the nickel, cobalt, manganese and lithium will play an important role. Now, that is why, of course, if we wanna be a front runner in decarbonizing the value chain, this is where we need to focus on. We have just recently submitted a couple of weeks ago our targets to SBTi. Now what have we submitted? Now you see on this graph our starting position. You see if we don't do anything, we'll end up with double as much. We have submitted a target of -42% carbon intensity. Now, as Mathias already said, this means that we would reduce by 8.3 million at least and we would end up exactly at the same level as 2019 and this despite the tremendous growth that we're gonna go through. This means in practice that we would be able to reduce by 75% the carbon emissions compared to today's estimated market average. That's really a lot. You wonder probably how are we going to do this. Now, we've identified a number of levers to realize this 42% reduction. The first lever is really making use of our unique and strong closed loop model that we have internally and we will use more of the recycled metals that we have in our activities. Denis and Kurt will talk about this a little bit more this afternoon and later this morning, when they talk about precious metals recycling and battery recycling. Now, the second part is that we want to increase the input of secondary materials in our mix. We already do more than 50% of our input mix is already secondary materials. As you know, these have a much lower footprint than primary materials. The third element is working together with our suppliers, of course. Here, we will also give preference to those suppliers that have a low carbon footprint or that have a clear roadmap towards a lower carbon footprint. The fourth one is moving further upstream into refining. These are a number of the levers together with our operational excellence to make sure that we reach this 42% reduction in carbon intensity. Again, we see that sourcing really is a key differentiator and we've always been a front runner in sustainable sourcing. Of course, due to our history, we're have quite some experience with sourcing. Now, again, as I said, previously, Scope 1, 2 and 3 will allow us to reduce by 42 or 75% compared to today's estimated market average, with respect to battery materials. Now, this brings me to my last slide. I think it's important just to recap 1, 2 and 3, the essence of Umicore's RISE strategy and we will accelerate the decarbonization and deliver sustainable and low carbon products to our customers. Let's not forget that already today, through our products and services, we are able to avoid 11 million tons of CO2 equivalents, thanks to our e-mobility, thanks to our recycling services. Eleven million tons of CO2 is about the same as 2.5 million combustion engine vehicles standing parked in the garage for a year. In addition to that, we're able to avoid nearly 3 million tons of NOx emissions in the air, thanks to our catalysis business that Bart will be talking about later. That leaves me at just concluding that, I think it's clear from our strategy that ESG is really part of that. You will see that each of my colleagues of the business units later today will be briefly talking about the S slide as well and highlight some sustainability elements that are specific for their business units and that's something I'm really looking forward to. Umicore for me is not only the company that is supplying materials for a better life, it is also the company that is able to offer low carbon sustainable products that customers need today. I would say that for Umicore, the future is green in all senses of the word. I think that now I can pass the word to my colleague, Denis, who will talk to you about advanced materials. Thank you. Thank you, Géraldine. Good morning, everyone, here in the room and also those following from home or from the office. I hope you're not too angry. I'm going to tell you more about advanced materials. First of all, advanced material is actually what we do at Umicore. We start from metal. We use technology to transform them into materials. These materials allow customer to bring functionalities to their own customers but at the end of the road, we take them back and recycle them. So that's what we do and that's why some of our materials are on Mars and some of our materials will allow you to see in the dark. Now, sorry for a busy slide. Let me introduce you the magnificent seven, the seven business units that are at the core of what Umicore does. Dealing with metal, more than 30 metals, serving very specific markets but always with a very strong recycling content. Recycling is nearly always part of the value proposition of these businesses. A few example, I won't go into the full list. Cobalt & Specialty Materials. They are producing metal chemicals and distributing them to very diverse group of customers. Actually, they are at the origin of the success story of battery materials, because back in the 1990s, we were producing metal chemicals that were used to make. That was the very beginning of lithium-ion. Then we realized that there was big opportunity there and that's why we got into battery materials. This is pretty nice offspring, if you want, from this business, Cobalt & Specialty Materials. Now, a totally different business but also dealing with metal, Metal Deposition Solutions. Precious metals have fantastic properties. I mean, they can. They resist against corrosion. They have fantastic mechanical properties. And that makes them used, for example, in connectors. Problem is that you cannot make a connector full of precious metals. It would be way too expensive. What Metal Deposition Solutions does is that they put a very tiny amount of precious metals on the surface of some other metal and this gives the functionalities without the cost. Think about it every time you plug your cell phone for recharging in the evening or whenever you plug your car and you will have to plug them hundreds of times, thousands of times but the functionality needs to remain the same. That's the value proposition that Metal Deposition Solutions provide to their customers. Third example, Jewelry & Industrial Metals. I mean, recycling is the basis of what they offer to their customer. They sell products. The recycling service, the value proposition about the recycling of the product is always part of what they offer to their customer. One example, we make big parts out of platinum, pretty expensive stuff, that are used in refining high purity glass. The glass that is used in TV screens and things like that. The value proposition we make to our customer is something that is going to last longer than what our competitors are supplying. When I'm talking longer, it's, we speak about years, more than a year. A plant refining glass, temperature of 1,500 degrees, the material need to last for that. Long life does not mean infinite life. At the end of the day, they also want these metals to be recycled. That's what we propose to the customer. We are going to sell you something that has fantastic functionalities and at the end of the day, you will recover the metal which is in it. These are three, I think, examples of what these business units are doing. The icing on the cake is that many of them actually also play a role in mobility because if you talk about electronics, if you talk about connectors, they are also in mobility applications. Now, maybe jumping into a specific case, Electro-Optic Materials, which is a business unit which is actually the one making the product that are on Mars. We make germanium substrates. These germanium substrates are used to make in semiconductor application and mostly to make solar cells. Solar cells that have the highest yields, highest performance and are therefore mostly used in space application. Most of the satellites circling the Earth are using germanium-based solar cells and the Mars rover is also using these solar cells. That's why we are on Mars. Another application of Electro-Optic Materials, just to show you that we can serve sometimes with a very strong leadership position, very different application, optical fibers. When you make optical fibers, you need to start from very pure germanium tetrachloride and that's what we make. The recycling is also part of the equation. I remember in my early years at Umicore, I was a young researcher and we visited a customer. T he customer had a headache because the yield of the production of the optical fiber was not so good and they were producing quite a lot of scrap. They were concerned because this scrap was costing them money. They needed to pay someone to get rid of these scraps. We figured out that this scrap contained quite a lot of germanium. W e offered them a solution where not only they could avoid the cost of disposing the scrap but also recovering part of the germanium. These days, this customer still buys from us 25 years later. The last example is infrared optics. Again, a completely different application. You may remember that these all these cameras that were scanning our temperature during the COVID times, they most of the time use infrared optics, which can be made by Umicore. In the future, this is also going to be used in pedestrian detection. More than 50% of the metal used by this business is recycled. I mean, it is illustrative but it gives you an idea of what we do in this advanced material group. Key takeaways for this business unit, big synergy with Umicore. Why? Always about metals and the chemistry around metals. Recycling is always part of it and very often we also serve mobility applications. Technology is key. Customers are buying functionalities. We have an application knowledge. We have strong interaction with our customer because they come to us because we provide this technology. Very good returns. I mean, these are applications where we have a strong leadership position and that translates into good returns. There are growth opportunities in this market, so when they appear and are value creating, we are going to encourage, of course, the business unit to seize them. Now, let me dive a little bit deeper into precious metals. Precious Metals Refining, which you know is a big contributor to Umicore results and a very important landmark into our recycling story. I will go through two topics. First, explain to you a little bit what we do and why we are a world leader in complex and low carbon recycling but also how we are going to use the RISE pillars to further improve this business. Now, first of all, what Precious Metals Refining does is really at the heart of the closed loop model of Umicore. You can see that there is ore over there. There is mining, because mining, you need to start from mining. You need to prime the pump. The metal can only be recycled once they've been put in the system. There is always this mining part, which brings the first metal in the application and then needs to be smelted, refined, incorporated in the applications. Here you can see the three examples, Automotive Catalysts, battery materials, fuel cells, using these metals. At the end of life, we bring them back. There is a true complementarity with our other divisions. When we interact with our customer on battery materials, the recycling part is really part of the discussion from day one. That's what Mathias explained this morning. The same is true for fuel cells, the same is true for Catalysis. Thereto, the icing on the cake is that recycling already today reduces the CO2 footprint of this metal by about 50%. When people buy metals that are recycled, they save 50% of CO2 compared to a metal that would come from a mine. Now, looking into more detail in what Precious Metals Refining actually does. We are recovering 17 metals. We do complex metallurgy. If it is complex, it is for us. We recover 17 metals out of more than 200 types of complex waste streams. We are not a smelter dedicated to one or two or three feeds. We are a smelter which is intrinsically flexible to take these 200 different streams. We cover the full value chain. We can go from mines. We can take stuff that are very specific and complex into mine. This is not a major part of what we do but we can do that as well. We take a lot of stuff from smelters. We are somewhat, sometimes defined as the refiner's refiner. Because the refineries, when they are copper smelter or lead smelter or zinc smelter, they are really focusing on what they do. They need to be the best in transforming ores and concentrate into metals at the lowest cost possible and achieve the right impurities. In the process, sometimes impurities accumulate somewhere and it's an annoyance. It's something that disturbs their flow sheet. Their metallurgist, they could take them back and put them in their smelter but it would disturb and actually increase the complexity and the cost at their side. What we do is that we take that and we process it, we process it for them. It's a better value proposition for the smelters than doing it by themselves. Sometimes we even interact to change their own processes to optimize the full picture, to optimize the ecosystem. That's something we do on a daily basis with our smelting and refining customers. You also go deeper down the value chain to refine and recycle the waste from the manufacturing industry, making the product themselves b ut also the end-of-life consumer end-of-life product, spent automotive catalyst, electronic scrap and things like that. I think this line that you see here is very important because it offers a lot of flexibility. Market conditions are changing, metal prices are changing and the products that we process today are not the products that we processed five years ago or ten years ago. We use this flexibility to always focus on the raw materials that bring the most value to Umicore. How do we generate revenue? We have two streams of revenue. On the one end, they own their stuff, their raw materials and the metals that are in their raw materials. We get paid to extract the metals from these materials. They pay us what we call a treatment and refining charge to extract the metal for them, which is more or less determined by the complexity of materials. The more complex they are, the more you need to pay for that. This is done with an agreed recovery rate. We cannot recover 100% of the metal present, sometimes in a very dilute form. Typically, a customer would come and offer us to process, I don't know, 500 tons of something containing a few grams per ton of precious metals. We would process it and restitute a contractual restitution of metal. Could be 90%, 95%, depends on the metal. This is a commitment we take. Once we have said you are going to get, let's say, 90% of the metal that is in your stuff, we cannot say, "Sorry, guys but we got only 89%, so the 1% is missing." No, this is a commitment that we make. On the other end, if we can get a better recovery than the contractual one, the metal is ours. That's why we have also this second stream of metal, of revenue, which is the metal revenue. Of course, the metal revenue is not falling from the tree. It is simply because we are better at recovering these metals than the competition. The contractual recovery rate is defined by the market and if we do better than the market, then we can basically get that revenue for ourselves. These are the two value driver, the fixed fee and the value of metal revenue. Needless to say that the value of the metal revenue depends on the metal price and that's why we see a boost when the metal price is high. Okay, why is this a very attractive market for Umicore? It is today, it was yesterday and it's still going to be a very attractive business for Umicore tomorrow. F irst of all, this is a bit new, there are very strong regulatory requirements. We were doing recycling already 25 years ago when it was not mandatory because there was value in the product that we processed, value for our customers. Today, it's even mandatory. You need a recycled content in the product. There is societal pressure and societal needs. There is legislation, so this is going to support our business further. There is the intrinsic sustainability part, which is driven by metal scarcity. I mean, you are reading newspaper, you know that metals are getting scarce. This is also, by the way, supporting the price, which also helps more extraction but also more refining. There is this circular economy component and the greenhouse gas footprint that I just mentioned, which is incentivizing people to use recycled metals. Last but not least, the economic value. There was already an economic value in the past. The metals that are contained in the stuff have a value and if we can extract that value, it makes sense to recycle them. This is true regardless of the metal price. Of course, if the metal price would be zero, that would not be attractive but it's not zero. Even at the metal price of the past, it did make sense to extract them and it will make sense again, even if the price normalize in the future. Something that we have done in our plan, we have not taken any and Mathias mentioned that we have not considered the premiums that are going to come for recycled metals. We have considered that the metal price are going to go back to where they were. There is a likelihood that a market will develop where people want to pay more for recycled metal. Today, this market does not exist. This is not yet available, so it's very difficult to quantify. There is definitely an upside for us because if at some point in time people would be ready to pay more for something that comes from a recycled content, we would pocket obviously this value. The same if they would pay more for a metal containing a lower CO2 content but that's not factored in the plans. Now, where are we going to play? I mean, we are going to do more of what we do well. That's leverage our leadership position in complex low-carbon recycling. That's going to remain our focus. That's the focus of Precious Metals Refining I'm talking about. Of course, we are also going to support the new kid on the block that Kurt will develop later, the Battery Recycling Solutions. Why? Because this is an adjacent business. This is not the same but the metals are different but the key ingredients are the same. It's all about maximizing recoveries, having the lowest cost and the lowest emission. So I mean, that can be transferred. All the logistic issues, the dealing with the complexity of the materials, is something that we can definitely transfer and support at Battery Recycling Solutions. How are we going to win? That's through RISE. You are starting to get used to that, I believe. Reliable. Precious Metals Refining, the precious metal refining, business unit needs to be as reliable as a bank. Some of you work for banks, so you know what it means. Reliability can come from several factors. First, our flexibility. We are treating waste and by-products, so the customer does not know for sure what the composition of this waste or by-product is going to be. If from one day to the other, the composition is slightly changing, we are not sending them back home and saying, "Sorry, I can't process it anymore because you have added that impurity that I cannot process anymore," which is very typical for other players on the market. No. We tell them, "Look, let's look at it and let's try to solve that problem together." This is really something that our customer value a lot. Trust. There is a lot of value in what our customer entrusts us with. Sampling is always an issue because I mentioned before it. Sometimes it's 500 tons of materials that they have on their hands with a few grams per ton of precious metals. There is a lot of value but it's difficult to define how much it is. We are world leader in sampling heterogeneous complex feed. Our customer can witness but they also trust our ability to make a representative sample of a very large amount of material. That's something very valued by our customers. Reliability. We are entrusted with big value of precious metals. We need a few weeks or months to process them. The customer wants to make sure that they will get back their metal at the end of the row. That's the bank side of it. We are talking about EUR millions, 10s of millions, 100s of millions of value. That's something where you want a partner which is really reliable. The last one is a bit new, is this enablement through to reduce the CO2 footprint of our customer so they will be able to count on us. Mathias mentioned that for the OEMs and for the battery materials, this is also somewhat true for other metals. Now, innovation. I think it's fair to say that we used to be a mining company. We came into materials through the metals, so we have a long experience in refining and recycling and refining metals. We have what we call the pyro and hydro expertise, which is needed and I will come to that later on. We are going to keep this innovation and technology. You can come every single day at a large plant in Hoboken. There are teams of Ph.D.s in metallurgy, Ph.D.s in chemistry, improving the processes, debottlenecking something, adjusting a process to a new feed, changing completely, making a breakthrough process to do something in a different way, in a more efficient way. That's something we do. We will keep doing that, of course. What is new is that we are going to use this technology as well to develop to solve the CO2 reduction to achieve the CO2 reduction journey that Géraldine just described. First, on this expertise, I mean, you can't refine 17 metals and convert very complex and low-grade materials into metal in one step. You need many steps. The two main categories of processes that you have at your disposal when you're a metallurgist is the pyro, which is a smelting process, high temperature process and the hydro, which is putting the metal into solution and using these categories. At Hoboken, half of the processes are pyro, half of the processes are hydro. I think this is not always well-known because we always see ourselves as a smelter and we see the big smelting furnace. There is quite a lot of hydro processes. Why do we do combination? Because they all have their specific advantages. If you think about pyro, you have very high rate of reaction, so you can do a lot of stuff very fast. You have a very large robustness to impurities, because you have this averaging effect of the smelting. The physical footprint is actually lower because if you have a high rate of reaction, you can do a lot of stuff in a very limited space. If you do hydro, the metals are often very diluted in solution and you need huge forms of, let's say, equipment to process it. On the other end, hydro has a very big advantage in terms of selectivity. By combining the two, you get the best of both worlds. This is what we do on a daily basis in Hoboken and actually, this is also what Kurt will propose to do later on. Looking at our decarbonization goals, you have been seeing this avoiding emissions, let's say, tool, in Géraldine's presentation. This is actually something that we do for quite some time already by using the synergies between the feed. Some of the feed that we put in the smelter in Hoboken have heat content, so they create heat when you process them. Some of them consume heat. You put them together, you don't need a fuel and you get the best efficiency. That is something that we have been doing for cost reason for a lot of time but it's also going to be very helpful in reducing the energy consumption and hence the CO2. The second one, when we cannot avoid them, is to replace. Replacing, let's say fossil fuel by electricity looks straightforward. In our case, sometimes the fossil fuel is also reagent. It's a bit more complex than simply replacing a heat source. We are going to do it and we have good R&D people to find out how this can be done. The last one is capturing the greenhouse gas. Géraldine mentioned the NOx capture that we do in Hoboken. Of course, the right investment will be required. I mean, we want to be net zero, so we are going to do it. Again, this should, on the long term, translate into margins and premium. Now, let's look at the S. Maximizing the closed loop benefit. The smelter is 25 years old and has always done this. We have a majority of our input mix coming from secondary sources and we have this very much embedded. Also, the responsible sourcing is part of Umicore DNA, so we will keep doing that. We also know that urban mining is not straightforward. I mean, you need to deal with the coexistence with the neighboring communities. We don't spare any effort to improve continuously on that. On the first part, already more than 90% of our PGM metals are coming from secondary sources, so that's what we do at the smelter. You have all the range of certification that we have and as Géraldine mentioned, we are already saving huge amount of greenhouse gas just by doing more recycling compared to primary extraction. If you think about sustainable coexistence, what are we doing? We are, first of all, minimizing impact. That's the real red line. That's what we need to do. Using best available technology, for example, full encapsulation of our lead refinery. Our lead refinery is a huge building. It is put under negative pressure so that no single dust can escape the building without being processed. So that's something we have been doing a few years ago. Smart logistics. We actually steering our logistic activities depending on the weather conditions. If the weather is not favorable, we avoid doing stuff that could generate emissions. We also have real-time measurement, not only of the quantity of dust emitted but also the composition of the dus t. You can see that this reduction has been a fact and we have achieved a significant reduction between 2015 and 2021. We're not going to stop there but moreover, something that we have been announced and doing is the creation of a buffer zone between our plant, which you see at the right side. By the way, you see this lead refinery, which is fully encapsulated in gray. We have already a 1-hectare green zone on our site. We are creating a 5-hectare green zone and the purpose is to create a buffer between the industrial activity and the residential activity on the left side. Then excellence. We have industrial operations, so operational excellence is not something new for the people. They are doing it but we need somewhat to put the turbo on that. Mathias mentioned about the logistics. Logistics is a big part because we have these 200 categories of materials. But if you multiply that by the number of suppliers, we handle a lot of stuff in the plant. We are going the extra mile in terms of digitalization, automation to reduce significantly. Reducing the break-even point, reducing cost, increasing efficiency. I think this is pretty straightforward. Something we do as well, which has a very strong leverage, is debottlenecking. I will give you an example. This is on the left side, what we have done between 2010 and 2018 in terms of material processed input to the plant, to the furnace. We had already increased compared to the design capacity. The plant was built at the end of last century. It's already quite some time ago. Let's say in between 2000 and 2010, we had already increased the capacity by 80%. What we did in 2010 was already 80% higher than the design capacity because of better metallurgy, slag engineering, better refractories, I mean technical levers. And 2018, we have increased by another 50%. All in all, it's nearly multiplied by three between the design capacity and what we achieved in 2018. You would ask me but why did you then suddenly do badly in 2019, 2020 and 2021? Something happened in 2019. The precious metal price started to increase a lot. Then we made a trade-off between value and volume. We decided that it was much more profitable for Umicore to process very complex stuff containing a lot of precious metals at the cost of a little bit of volume but creating a lot more value. This is the kind of flexibility that we use in Hoboken. We are driven by value. We are not driven by volume. Of course, if you can get the volume, you get all the benefit in terms of cost. We can always go back to the 2018 situation in case the market situation would require it. Now, let me summarize how RISE is going to help us. I give you all the elements, so we don't change the business model. RISE is going to help us to get better. What we will get is sustainable returns and very strong cash flows even at normalized PGM price. They are in the plan and PMR continues to deliver outstanding return on capital employed and very strong cash flow. As I mentioned it before, there is an upside potential. First of all, if the metal price would be higher than what we have put in the plan but also if there are premiums associated with more recycle or low CO₂ content. There can also be both because probably the recycled demand and the low CO₂ will have also a positive impact on the metal price. That's in the plan. We've been pretty conservative and even being conservative, we generate quite a lot of value. Thank you. Yeah, last but not least, putting some figure on it. What we mean by providing strong cash flow and good value is EBITDA margins getting close to 40% and guaranteeing 20% return on capital employed even by 2030 when the metal price are going to be back to very historical level. We have been doing more but 20% is something that we can sustain. Thank you for your attention. Thank you, Denis. We have our next Q&A session. Mathias and Géraldine, you are invited back on stage. Maybe for the people in the audience, you need to bring the mic very close to your mouth when you speak because we had some feedback from the webcast that it was not always easy to understand the questions. We have about 20 minutes before we will be breaking for lunch. Hi. Ranulf Orr, Citi. Just two questions for me, please. It's been mentioned a few times now the move to further upstream integration in cathode materials. Could you please expand a little bit on that and the plans there? Then a second one just on recycling. You talk about 200 complex waste streams but presumably there are only a couple that really matter. Auto cats comes to mind, for instance. Could you give some clarity around those and the different dynamics within those sort of subsectors? Thanks. Very good. Let me take the first one. This will be very much detailed in Ralph Kiessling presentation. Yes, we today are already if we compare us with our competitors, we are probably the most integrated on the value chain upwards. That means going up to refining. This will take even more importance in the future because two reasons for that. The first one is if you have exposure to the full value chain, you can influence also the value creation and with that also the cost performance. As I have showed to you, as well, the more upstream you are working on innovations on the processes, the micro-engineered precursor that I have shown you that can even be, let's say, influence in the further stage gives you an upside on your competitiveness over the full value chain. The second thing is that's coming more and more, it is a matter of securing supply. For example, there are several regions in the world where you cannot just extract, let's say, nickel and ship it to somewhere. You have to have a value add in the region and you have to commit to do something with the nickel that you get out of the earth to be able to have a supply stream. This is something that we are engineering together with our customers, how we can do it in the best way. To further strengthen on that. That's a very important point. When we talk about the phase of expansion, it is also the expansion and the ultimate goal in each of the regions where we are active to have a full value chain approach mine to battery, excluding the mine and excluding the battery, of course. Yeah. On the scope of what we can process. Yeah. Spent automotive catalysts would be one of these categories. Obviously a very important category nowadays with the PGM price of today. Now, when you do recycling, you don't have basically a long-term contract like you could have with a mine. So you are dependent on the market availability. So what we have seen is that spent automotive catalyst, there is a big incentive to recycle them because of the precious metal price. This is also influenced by the scrapping of cars. If you have less cars scrapped, there are less automotive catalyst available on the market. This is a bit negative for the time being but all in all, spent automotive catalyst is a very important part of what we process but it's only a part of it. Even in terms of PGMs, spent industrial catalysts are also playing a role. Industrial byproducts are also bringing PGM to the plant. Hi, Geoff Haire from UBS. Just two questions. First of all, on the sustainability, is the cost of the sustainability captured within the CapEx plans that were outlined earlier? And then secondly, specifically on carbon capture, you mentioned that that's still work in R&D but carbon capture is a well-established technology. So why is Umicore not using an off-the-shelf option in that area? And then secondly, just on recycling, do you ever have situations where you only have contracts that just take the treatment charge and you don't have any benefit from metal revenue? Or all the contracts within recycling have both elements? Yeah. I will answer the second question and yeah, I can take both. No, I can. Start with the last one. Yeah, I start with last one. On the contracts always have a metal component but sometimes it's a tiny one. They always have a metal component because recovery rate is a fact. I mean, nobody can make 100% recovery rate and then the market defines more or less what the usual recovery rates are. If the usual recovery rate is very high, there is limited margin to do a metal contribution on top. But if the recovery rate that is defined by the market is rather low, then you have a big potential. The two components are always present. Usually, the more complex the material, the more room there is to make metal margins because there are not many people able to recover the metals with a good rate. Okay. Maybe the first question, with respect to whether it's included in the plan. Yes, the main ticket item for our ESG is, the CapEx required for the Scope 1 emissions and that is clearly, included in the plan, in our strategy. That's an easy, straightforward answer. With respect to the, carbon capture for our R&D department, yes, there are carbon capture technologies out there and of course, we're building on those. Denis will probably be able to explain to you better that the processes in Hoboken, where we have the biggest Scope 1, contribution, are very complex processes. It's all about adapting the existing carbon capture technology to our processes and that's not such an easy task to do. We are confident that by the end of the decade, we will have advanced in that and we'll be able to show results. Now, there isn't much I can add to that. Indeed, there are off-the-shelf technologies but which are not developed for the non-ferrous metal smelting. We need to adapt them to the kind of gases that we get, the impurities that are contained in the gases. Yes, it's work in progress but we are going to bank as much as we can on established technology, of course. There was a question also over there. Exactly. Yes. Good morning. Wim Hoste from KBC. I have a couple of questions. Maybe first, you're offering a lot of additional transparency but recycling is still a bit of a black box in terms of profits generation and the drivers. So can you maybe split the profits by metal and also by, let's say, TCs and free metal? That's the first question. Then the second one is, can you maybe elaborate on the visibility of your input streams? You indicated that there's differences for end-of-life materials, auto cats versus maybe mining. So what is the average visibility you have in terms of input streams in recycling? And then a third question would be, ESG related. There's some stringent regulation for blood lead levels of children that becomes more stringent over time. How confident are you to reach that 2 microgram per deciliter levels in a few years' time? Can you maybe elaborate on that? Thank you. Yeah. On the first question, I'm afraid that I cannot detail per metal or even between TC and RC. It's first of all a very complex thing and this is not the level of detail we want to disclose. Your second question is on the visibility. What we have, we still mostly do mid to low, l et's say midterm contracts. We have often a relationship with our customer where they expect to send us a certain amount of, let's say, spent automotive catalyst. They also face the reality and so there is a band in which they can have some flexibility. We need it also for the mix of the plant. We need certain quantities but you sometimes have a bit less than you had expected in the budget. It's less predictable in a way but we do a bit of spot contract but we would have typically yearly contracts with most of our suppliers, with a certain margin for more or less volumes. On the emission part, I mean, we are very confident that we have the technologies in place. This is the highest priority in the plant right now. They are doing whatever it takes, first of all, to reduce emissions, because this is what we have under control. We can reduce our emissions. If that is done, obviously, it's going to be much easier to reach the targets in terms of lead in blood. Maybe I can add to that. As Denis said, our operations today are really state-of-the-art technology. We have, in the past years, always respected all the legal requirements and the requirements of our permits with respect to the emissions. We go way beyond those requirements. In addition, we have set much more stringent targets voluntarily and we are complying with those as well. As you know, the permit is going down year per year in what it is allowed to do. Based on all the technology advancement that we're making, we're really beating the curve every single time. We're confident that by 2026, we will reach those targets as well. What's important as well is that, obviously, you know, we also have a historical past but what we're doing with that as well is that we have built a green zone of five hectares between the plant and the local community on the side and that will significantly contribute as well. We're feeling confident that we will reach those requirements by 2026. Thank you. Hi. It's Georgina Fraser from Goldman Sachs. Denis, I've got a question for you that is maybe a bit more technical and just a point of general interest. In metal recycling. Why is it that you can't have a 100% recycling rates of metals? Which metals have the lowest recovery rates and are also scarce in nature and therefore, we should be worried that we're gonna completely run out of them even with recycling in the future? Yeah. I think the 100% recycling is what we strive to. Even in mining industry, you would be surprised how much of the metals are staying in the tailings of the mines just because they cannot be extracted physically. They are embedded in another mineral. They are lost. I think the metal industry never has 100% because you start with, let's say, 500,000 tons of materials and you need to extract a few tons of the metal you are looking for. The vast majority is something that you need to dispose or in tailings in case of mine or as a slag. This may contain a little bit of metal. The 100% is what we strive to but it's difficult to achieve. Obviously, the higher the value of the metal, the more incentive you have to use additional steps to recover them. That's a dream but unfortunately, this is not possible. If you are better than the competition and I think we can say we are better than competition, then you can benefit from that additional yield. Over there, we have one question. Hi. It's Riya Kotecha from Bank of America. My question is about some news that came out, I think in December 2020 about higher radioactivity levels at Umicore's Olen site. I think in May 2022, there was a news release that said that there's new legislation that allows the imposition of financial burdens on users and owners of these potentially contaminated sites. Is this something that's sort of on your radar in terms of a potential ESG risk? Or do you consider it to sort of be a case closed? Like, how are you thinking about this? Thanks. Well, thank you for the question. Yes, indeed. There is draft legislation out there. Actually, we were very happy with that legislation. That legislation will allow us to move forward. We've had activities relating to radium in the past, in the 1920s to 1970s, I think. We have residues of that and we have encapsulated those in our tank in the Olen site but it's completely encapsulated, so there is absolutely no danger. We all work in the Olen site, so that it's completely safe. The regulator, the authorities follow this up also with us on a constant basis. We don't see this as an issue. The legislation will actually allow us to move forward because we had to wait for the final storage of those tailings or of those residues. Until legislation was in place. With the legislation and the implementing acts that are going to come, hopefully soon, we expect that by 2024 we will be able to develop a final action plan to find a final destination for these things. There is no harm to environment or people or any risk of that at this moment in time at all. We don't really see that as a problem, no. Okay, perhaps one final question. I wanted to slip in one from the webcast but go ahead, Sebastian. The floor is yours. No, no, it's okay. We have enough time. Thank you. Can we touch on hedging with the, what is the level in multi-year terms that you feel comfortable with at this stage? Another way of putting this question is, are you hedged now for certain metals to 2025, 2026 or is there a hard stop at which we should start thinking about using spot prices again for the Recycling segment? Thank you. Filip, do you want to take that? Yeah, I think it's a good time to bring our CFO back in the game here. He was a little bit too relaxed. I wouldn't really want to add anything. Is it on? Yeah, it's on. Okay. Anything except for what we mentioned, what was it? With the full-year results, we haven't significantly increased that, Sebastian. We're talking about two years out. We're talking about precious metals, mostly. We can update you in Jul but there's no fundamental increase. Obviously we will, like, roll forward, try to increase the hedging proportion for those metals going forward. Compared to what we said in February or the update at the AGM in May, there's no fundamental news on that one. Is that okay? First question from the audience online. Yes. First opportunity for a question. Filip, I feel you have to stand up again because it's about the PGM prices, so it's linked to both Denis' piece and Filip's piece. You talk about normalizing PGM prices. How do these price levels compare to long run average prices above, in line, below? What are your expectations on the price and earnings contribution of the minor and specialty metals? Do you expect these to also normalize? Okay. Denis, we can make it a team answer but I will start. When we talk about normalization, it's a gradual normalization. You've seen the graph we put out, like what is more or less the consensus which is out there. We follow that. We're a bit more conservative actually than what is on the slide. It continues after 2025. To answer the question directly, what do you mean with normalization? It means that we expect or that we have assumed, I should say, precious metal prices, specifically PGM prices, to go back to their historic low, I can say, levels. Most of that change continues to happen after 2025. You have a first, I would say, correction up to 2025, 2026 and that continues, which you saw in the numbers in recycling. That's the kind of headwind we talk about. If it doesn't happen for, I mean, good reasons, it means there's an upside to our plan. We really went down to historic levels. The second question, Evelien, can you help us? Sorry or part of the question. On the minor and the specialty metals and how. On the mix for Hoboken. Do you want to take that, Denis? I think we have 17 metals, so we extract value from the 17 metals. Nowadays, the precious metals are making the lion's share and this is where our focus is. We do refine the other metals and we do get revenue from the other metals but nowadays they are not changing, they are not moving really the needle. Yeah. The PGMs and we even. PGM, gold, silver, these are the main contributors. Yeah. You know, making the bridge with the question on the hedges, you know, in terms of hedging for palladium, for example, we're pretty high hedged. Platinum to a certain extent as well. Rhodium, you know, that is a more difficult metal to hedge. In terms of, I would say, the sensitivity to metal prices of the PGMs, rhodium is the most important one, yeah. Was there still a question from the audience here? If not, then we are ready for a longer break, so we will come back and reconnect in one hour and 10 minutes from now, so 2:00 P.M. London time. Thank you. Very good. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. This is the video that we wanted to show this morning but I think it fits very well here as well because it summarizes somewhat the messages that we have been bringing so far. There is still an important part to come because this afternoon we will focus on all the activities that are driven by an enabling mobility transformation. I gladly hand over to Ralph for his presentation. Thank you, Evelien. Yeah, good afternoon to everybody here in London and from wherever you are joining us. I hope you're all re-energized by the break and ready for Rechargeable Battery Materials. Rechargeable Battery Materials are at the heart of Umicore's 2030 RISE strategy and they are at the heart of the mobility transformation. While there is consensus and there is no doubt that this industry has exponential growth, there at times question whether the industry and Umicore can manage it in a sustainable and in a profitable manner. Yes, we can and we will. I will now walk you through in the next 45 minutes or so how the mobility transformation creates exponential growth for Umicore's demand in cathode active materials. How Umicore, with its unique business model will differentiate itself and create values for its customers, for its partners and how we will translate it in profitable and in sustainable growth. Let me start with the market. As Frank already mentioned, this exponential growth is driven by a couple of levers. One is the regulatory push in all major regions but most pronounced in Europe, where the European Union just announced two weeks ago to ban internal combustion engine sales as of 2035. We see even stronger OEM commitments. Stellantis, for instance, announced recently to have their fleet 100% electrified in Europe by 2030 and 50% in the US. Mercedes-Benz is going in a similar direction with 100% electrification, except for niche markets and application. In North America, GM is also pushing for decarbonization of their fleet by 2035. Of course, you have the ever-stronger consumer sentiment going into electric vehicles. We have translated this for light-duty vehicle in our forecast, in our market model, starting with a BEV ratio of 5% in 2021 up to about 34% in 2030. The remainder still for plug-in hybrid vehicles and of course, internal combustion engine vehicles. For medium and heavy-duty vehicles, we see also clearly an uplift in battery electric vehicles but here it's more differentiated. It's more in the medium-duty vehicles and the short-haul heavy-duty vehicles. While for the long-haul heavy-duty vehicles, it's more the fuel cell-driven electrification, where Umicore has also very strong offerings via the fuel cell catalyst. We translated this in about 17% battery electric vehicle penetration by 2030. While there is clear upside potential for the medium- and heavy-duty segment, we have focused right now our strategy on the growth of the light-duty vehicle segment. What you can see here are our estimates, our expectations in this massive growth from 2022 to 2030, with an average CAGR of 25% and we see this rather on the conservative side and this may even further accelerate. To give you an example, we have projected at our capital market days in 2018 for the light-duty vehicle cathode active material demand 500 GWh. Now we project 1 TWh for 2025, so doubling it. There's enormous growth in the market. We are addressing with our technology portfolio all major design to performance and design to cost segments with our high nickel, mid nickel and the emerging manganese-rich technologies. With that, we see that we are covering about 75% of the total addressable market. There will be a remainder for LFP but with a clear regional differentiation, most pronounced in China. The 75% also addressing emerging technologies like solid state batteries, where we have an innovation and a development pipeline for cathodes and for catholytes. This we see ramp up still to a one-digit percentage by 2030. While we see a growth of annual more than 20% in all regions, there are three major regions who account for about 90% of the total demand. This is China with about 40%, Europe with about 30% and North America with roughly 20%. Ten percent will then between different countries and region, such as developed economies like Korea, like Japan or more emerging economies like India. We see the growth rather accelerating in the second half of the decade here, more pronounced even but coming from a much lower basis. Three major regions account for 90% of the total worldwide demand. What we also see is a clear trend in regionalization and that has different reasons. Reasons are from economy side, from country side, that they have local content requirements. We see also in a geopolitical context that imports from one to another country may become prohibitive due to tax and duty requirements and restrictions. This is the one hand. On the other hand, it's coming from the customers, from the OEMs, clear requirements, A, on security of supply and this backward integrated and B, also have sustainability requirements. To ship all raw materials and intermediates around the world is really becoming also prohibitive in the quest of the decarbonization of the value chain. This brings me already to the next point and how will Umicore, with its offering, be profitable and be sustainable with this growth? Let me take a step back. What is it about cathode active materials? Cathode active materials are a key component in terms of technology for the battery. It determines, for instance, range. It determine energy density. Safety is a critical feature. You have also cycle life or from the cost side, is recyclability. Cathode active materials account for 1/3 of the value of the cost of a battery. It's very clear that this is a very critical component on the cell technology roadmaps of OEMs and of cell makers. To produce cathode active materials along the value chain requires very specific competencies and skills around three areas, product and technology, process and operations and supply and value chains. We emphasize this already in our capital market days in 2018 but it becomes more and more relevant and further refined now. Starting with product and technology, you need to have the right and higher performance technology produced with the right quality requirements to meet the customer specifications. You need the right chemistry but also the right processes for it. Joint developments with the customer give you access to the right specification, to the requirement of the customers but also to their technology roadmaps. This is another important angle. Of course, to provide this offering, you need to have the right technology portfolio also backed up by IP to develop with the customers the innovation roadmap, for this generation but also for the next generation and for the next cycles. Process and operations. Here it's really to master the complexity of the operations, be it industrialization, be it scaling up, producing at economy of scale and do it with the right efficiency and quality. Efficiency determines the productivity and finally, also the profitability. Another very important criteria is quality and purity. While on the one hand, with the cathode active materials, you have CapEx requirements like for larger chemical plants or refineries, you have purity requirements like in the pharmaceutical industry. This requires really specific skills to manage this spread. Last but not least, it's the supply and the value chain to really have access to the right raw materials. That means meeting all ESG requirements but also with a local carbon footprint, which becomes more and more critical in the future with the requirements of the customers. Having refining and leaching competences and the right footprint for it further facilitates that because it gives you more flexibility and supply security for your in-feed. Last but not least, having the value chain, a backward integrated value chain in this region in these three major regions. We were talking about 90% in three major regions. Having the regionalized footprint approach is also critical for the supply and value chain. Umicore has these skills along the value chain to really create benefit for its customers and partners for their own success and can really differentiate itself versus competitors with that. With that, we have a clear strategy to establish this backward integrated value chain in all the major regions. To start with Europe, to extend our leadership that we have in Europe. We have been an early mover with the setup of the operations in Poland for cathode materials but also in Finland for precursor and for refining. We have set up agreements with our customer. Mathias spoke about the JV intention for Volkswagen. We have a long-term agreement with ACC and this really provides the basis for our footprint development backward integrated in Europe and further grow from here. The next pillar is entering North America with a local footprint along with our customer qualifications and with platform awards. We are in the very final phase to acquire land in North America and we expect this to announce it before the half-year results. This land will give us the capability to do the backward integration with our footprint in North America as we have in Europe. The start of production is planned towards the end of 2025, starting with cathode active materials but also then backward integrated with precursor and later on also with refining and with leaching. Thirdly, it's reinforced our position in the Asian market by expanding our platform exposures with more customers and towards 2025, then fully utilizing our footprint, our backward integrated footprint in Asia and then further develop and grow from there. How we will do this along the RISE strategy, strategic and execution pillars. Let me start with the R, the reliable, the go-to transformation partner. Going forward, this means to create, to set up partnerships along the value chain and this is clearly different from the traditional supplier-customer relationship that have been dominating in the past. You still will see this slide a few more times and that is not a coincidence because this shows how Umicore is uniquely positioned to be a transformation partner for the whole, mobility transformation, be it internal combustion engine, including plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, be it battery electric vehicles but also be it fuel cell-driven battery electric vehicles. We have decades-long experience, close customer interaction, customer intimacy and understanding with all major OEMs as well as with cell makers. For the automotive catalyst, the experience goes almost back 50 years, for cell making, for the battery materials about 25 and roughly the same also for the emerging fuel cells. We are uniquely positioned to serve our customers along the whole mobility transformation. Let's have a bit more closer look for the cathode materials and the rechargeable battery materials. I don't want to go to all the years here of our long-standing track record, just explain that we have over 25 years experience to develop cathode active materials first for portable electronics application, then for EV application, have built a backward integrated manufacturing footprint with the experience to produce at scale and with the highest quality. We will now accelerate it and have already started with it with our entry into Europe with providing the latest technologies to our customers and partner and setting up, the right partnerships. This brings me to a key element of our RBM strategy. This is partnerships for the decarbonization and for the electrification along the value chain. We have started this and you can witness this already, with the announcement around VW and ACC. This creates value for Umicore and also for the partners, of course. It gives access to long-term demand and with that security to scaling up to economy of scale with the capacity roadmaps of the customers. For the customer, it provides security of supply. We recently were in a discussion with a major OEM who said, "We need security of supply. We don't want to face a second chip crisis. The next one is really to industrialize and to develop technology roadmap based on our technology portfolio and our industrial know-how, while keeping, of course, our FTO and our IP. Defining together with the customers the technology roadmaps for the shorter but also for the longer term. Having partnerships models means working along the value chain to really decarbonize the battery value chain. That can start from sourcing go via refining and of course, to precursor into cathode manufacturing production. Last but not least, having the investments, having co-funding for the customers, having customer commitments and our own commitment, of course, which will be value creative for both partners. Our value chain proposition doesn't stop here. I just mentioned critical access to raw materials, which we have with our long-term agreements, on the raw material side, low carbon footprint and ESG requirements covered, having a proven footprint for refining leaching and the competencies of course and also having the same for precursor and cathode materials. What is critical is that we are able to to close the loop with recycling and Umicore has the clear competencies and Kurt Vandeputte will give you more details later on about that. With closing the loop, having the full requirements of the customers, which includes meanwhile recycling as well, recycled materials. We got these first requirements from OEMs. We will really provide peace of mind to our customers from sustainable sourcing to security of supply. You may now ask, "Yeah, how will this now translate in our, in its footprint ambitions?" Let me explain this right now to you. This is our Asian footprint, Korea and China. Again, backward integrated from cathode materials to refining. It includes also our R&D footprint, which, with our headquarters in Korea, we just announced two months ago that we have an expansion with a new R&D center to really even serve our customers better and faster. We have also applied technology competencies for Asia, for Europe and for North America as well. This we complemented with our early mover approach into Europe, being early on in Nysa for cathode materials and in Kokkola for precursor and refining and also having set up a process competence center in Olen in Belgium. Here we have the same, a center for R&D incubation for our long-term roadmap and I will come to this in a minute. The next step is that we set up plans, a clear roadmap to expand our European footprint by starting by the end of 2023, by further expanding into cathodes, precursors, as well setting up further nickel refining and leaching competencies and also establishing in Europe a battery technology center to be even closer to our customers here and to serve them faster and better along their technology roadmaps. Our North America ambition and I just said it, is clearly to be local by the end of 2025, starting with cathode materials but then also backward integrating and also from the technology, applied technology side, having a battery center in North America to also serve our customer there. With this footprint approach, we will cover all major markets, so the 90% all major markets, and serve the other 10% because of course also from there, which we do, by the way, because we are located in Korea. Serve them backward integrated from cathode materials into refining and have also R&D footprints in all regions. In Asia, we will complement this investment, as of 2024, with selected investment and plan to further growth than in CapEx in the second half of the decade. How do these ambitions translate in capacity? This is what you see on this slide. We started as the basis from last year, 65 GWh in Asia with a clear ambition to go to 230 GWh by 2026. Most of the growth will be accounted for in Europe but also complemented with our entry in North America by 2025. With the vision to further grow towards 400 or above 400 GWh by 2030. You may ask now, is this just a linear projection in growing with the market? No, it's more concrete behind. As you have already seen from the announcement for VW and for ACC, their clear ambition is to go combined to over 200 GWh by 2030. Having 50% of the envisioned capacity already in the roadmap eight years ago is a very strong signal. This brings me to technology and innovation leadership. Technology and innovation leadership will be and remain the core of Umicore. It will not be, and this is clearly confirmed by the customer roadmaps they are sharing with us, that there will be one-size-fits-all solution. No, there will be customized offerings for design to performance, for the design to cost elements, for different applications. Umicore is covering, and this very well, is very competitive right now with this design to performance offerings in high nickel and design to cost offerings in mid-nickel, high voltage, and also the emerging manganese-rich technologies. Of course, we are also early on working on the next generation of technologies like cathodes and like catholyte for solid-state batteries. To give you a bit more detail, you see short- and medium-term, the focus is in high nickel. This is from 80% nickel to the mid-90s% nickel with further developments like on low cobalt, like additional safety features, for instance. On design to cost, it's mid-nickel, high voltage, and also manganese-rich. Manganese-rich that really gains attraction by the customers. We have development cooperation with numerous customers, with OEMs but also with cell makers. We don't leave it here. We are proactively preparing also the long-term roadmap. Working, I mentioned it already, on cathode and catholyte materials for solid-state batteries, having an indicator for silicon-carbon anodes but also for further cathode, longer-term cathode development like sulfur-based cathode, like disordered rock salts or sodium-ion-based cathode. These, of course, are currently still in a more exploratory phase. Here, a snapshot about the introduction schedule of our high nickel technology, based on the current customer qualification roadmap starting towards the end of 2023, and then depending on the customer in a staged approach towards 2025. For the design to cost with mid-nickel in a similar fashion and manganese-rich we see emerging towards the second half of the decades. With a roadmap projection currently starting in 2026. Of course, the next generation, R&D developments and so on these different technologies are continuously ongoing and also shared with our customer with early sampling and so on. A word on manganese-rich as a very promising technology for the design to cost segment. It has, on the one hand, features like for NMC, that means energy density, like recyclability and very important is the footprint reach, so the supply chain. Manganese-rich can be produced with Umicore's asset bases that we have for high and for mid-nickel. That means with our footprint development globally, we will be able to produce it in every region of the world. It has also the advantage that especially outside China, it's really cost competitive with LFP. LFP needs a totally different manufacturing footprint. Zooming in on solid-state batteries. Here, the introduction schedule with smaller programs or demonstration programs we see emerging toward the mid of the decade and then further also in a staged approach emerging in the second half of the decade with a final market share to be seen but we estimate somewhere between 5%-10% toward 2030. We have numerous agreements in place, Mathias said it already, about 15 agreements with partners, with OEMs, with startups. We are proactively working with academics, so we can really claim to be in a leading position for our cathode development. Also we are working in detail on catholytes. Catholyte provide a pre-integration, a chemical bonding early on between cathode and electrolytes, and has a clear potential for that to further boost and increase the energy density and finally also reduce costs. I'm very excited that I can inform you right now that we will do an announcement, today to cooperate with Idemitsu, who is a leading technology manufacturing, leading technology company in the area of sulfide-based solid-state battery electrolytes. We will put our forces here in the development together, and this will further accelerate our leadership for the catholyte development and for the industrialization. Again, a word on the manufacturing footprint. A lso cathodes and catholyte with some additions can then be produced with Umicore's global manufacturing footprint. These materials will be available for our customers in all regions. Sustainability. Also at the risk of repeating what has been said a couple of times, sustainability is really close to our heart and is in our DNA. We have been pioneering in responsible source materials, setting up a cobalt framework and really increasing the standards for Umicore on the one hand but for the industry on the other hand as well. Going forward, our clear ambition is to be pivotal, to be a leading partner for the decarbonization of the battery value chain. Decarbonization, of course, first of all starts at our end. We do it on all scopes. Scope 1 is to further optimize increased efficiency by energy efficiency improvement. For Scope 2 and Géraldine already provided you details on that. For each and every greenfield and brownfield investment, it is mandatory from the beginning on that we are 100% provided with green energy. We started with that with our operations in Nysa, with a power purchase agreement and about renewable energy. We complement this right now in Kokkola for our precursor, for our refining operation, and we will of course extend it wherever possible also to our existing operation. Very clear, every expansion will be 100% fed by renewable energy. In Scope 3, we have signed already contracts in the past looking at a very low CO₂, a very low carbon footprint, of course, meeting all the ESG requirements with cobalt, with nickel and also having the first zero carbon agreements in place for lithium. We have set up a clear ambition and roadmap to reduce the carbon intensity for our cathode materials. Industry average right now, it's about 30 CO₂ equivalents per kilogram. We are today at 20, and we have a clear ambition and set up a roadmap to go to about 8. Reducing the carbon intensity by more than 50%. This will of course be supported for area like recycled material coming then also from Umicore. With that we can have a reduction potential of more than 3 million tons of CO₂ by 2030. Last but not least, excellence in execution. Here I have to clearly state for Rechargeable Battery Materials, excellence in execution, be it innovation, be it operations, be it supply, be it transformation of the organization to cope with the huge growth requirements, is really mandatory for the success. Let me give you examples on continuous improvement. Operational excellence and continuous improvement, of course, will not only start tomorrow. We have 20 years experience in Asia to efficiently operate our cathode active material plants and to continuous improvement. To give you some examples, we have reduced or increased the energy efficiency by about 15% over the last five years. With the introduction of the latest technologies in Nysa, we will further reduce it. We have looked in downtime optimization in other areas, and we have increased our output by about 20% on a comparable asset basis. One area to mention, there is a very close link between R&D development and process development. Step changes in process require a close link with the R&D product development. This is a reason that we also spend sizable amounts for our R&D process development. R&D product process development go hand in hand. This will pre-translate it then step-wise for the next step changes into engineering, into footprint, and into industrialization. Here we have concrete programs set up to really optimize our operations footprint with the latest process technology. We have around innovation, continuous improvement, three levers. I just mentioned the process development, which is closely linked also with the product development. We have operational excellence, which includes, of course, debottlenecking. Also, Denis mentioned it already today for the refining business. We are doing this for a year, and this is part of the business model for a long time in Automotive Catalysts as well. It's of course CapEx optimization, like for sourcing, it's digitalization. If it's digitalization on having automated KPIs, having AGVs, having also the analytics digitalized, because with the high purity requirements, you have very high quality requirements. Last but not least, is the plant design with the expansion to really leverage the economy of scale with modular plant design, I come to this in a minute. Also having, of course, the right footprint selection, which allows you green energy access from the beginning on, which allows you to have the right logistics for the customer to have the right permits in place when you have a backward integration from cathode material to precursor and to refining. This is very critical. Access to talent and other areas. We have the clear ambition and a roadmap to improve our CapEx efficiency by 30% for the next years until 2030 and also substantially optimize and reduce our OpEx. This will be a key lever for our efficiency and finally, for our profitability. Here is an example of our innovative modular plant design. Traditionally, you have a more line-by-line design, really tailored to a specific battery grade, to a specific technology. We have now introduced for our Poland operation a modular design, which gives you flexibility between the different building blocks and also optimize individually the different building blocks. That means with this modular plant design, we have flexibility for all the different grades we produce now and will be producing in the future: high nickel, mid nickel, manganese rich, cathode, catholytes for solid-state batteries. It allows also for standardization and then the transferability to scale, let's say in a quick timeframe. Also that innovation can be transferred to these different building blocks. This is part of our roadmap of efficiency here right now to reduce the CapEx density by 30% over the next years. This brings me back to the key takeaways and to what you should remember from today. Umicore has a unique value proposition, and our strategy is to roll this unique value proposition out to all the major regions of Europe, extending our leadership in North America with an entry planned for 2025, and to further reinforcing our position in Asia. We will do this along the four RISE pillars. Reliable transformation partner means clearly having value-creative partnerships along the value chain. Innovation and technology will remain at the core of our doing. Innovation and technology is always the entry card for the customers, and that will not change for the foreseeable future. Sustainability, really work with our partners to decarbonize the value chain. Last but not least, and this is bringing everything together, really excel in everything what we do and to be very supportive in this area to reach the right profitability. With this value proposition, we have the clear ambition for sustainable EBITDA growth having a 20% EBITDA margin and becoming value accretive after 2026. Thank you very much. With this one, I would like to hand it over to my colleague, Bart, who will give you an introduction to our roadmap for the Automotive Catalysts business. Very good. Thank you. Okay. Good afternoon also from my side. I'll do one slide more. Transitioning from the exciting future that Ralph is showing and the credible plan that we have, I'm now going to talk to you about another exciting, still very promising business that we already have today, which is automotive catalysts. After this presentation, I hope that I was able to convey the message that this is still a business where we do expect quite some growth, where we do still see a lift up in value, and that we will have a credible plan throughout this towards 2030 on how we're going to execute and actually make sure that we capture this value here at Umicore. Let's get started. Going to start off with the markets. You see the graph has been flipped. It's not a coincidence that you will see that here, of course, for the light-duty vehicles, we still expect 66% internal combustion engines in 2030. If I go to the heavy-duty vehicles, we're still talking about 78% vehicles. This is still very sizable market shares, and the internal combustion engine remains the dominant drive train. Why is this important? Because on our road to clean mobility, there will still be a lot of internal combustions being built. That means that if the last internal combustion engine is sold in 2034, these vehicles will still be on the road until 2050. What we do really does matter and that's why there's still a lot of value in this business with the upcoming legislation, which I will touch upon later on. Now, if we look forward and if we look in our plan, we still see a peak coming for light duty vehicles. We can debate whether it's 2023, 2024, when will the post-COVID ramp be there? When is the chip shortage finally resolved? Will inflation have an impact, of course, on the customer demand? Yes. Questions out there. Does that fundamentally change our plan? No, it does not. We still see higher vehicles in the next years also for the internal combustion engine. You also see that the gasoline section is by far the largest segment. Guess what? That's where we are really good and where we have a really good position. If you look to light-duty diesel, it's not so obvious on the graph but this segment is dropping fast in Europe. Yet remains important in Southeast Asia, and there we also have the important customers in our portfolio. In 2030, we will still have 60 million internal combustion engines being built globally. Transitioning to the heavy-duty vehicles or the HDD. Here we still see a growth from 4-5 million vehicles. Here I'm not including the non-roads, so I'm not talking about the tractors or the big machinery, which is also going to be emissionized. That comes on top. That's really additional value, which you will not see on this graph. Big markets are, of course, China, the largest markets, the fastest-growing but also India becomes important and Europe will also still have growth. If you're talking about automotive catalysts, you really have to talk about legislation and what the impact is of that legislation. Let's have a look together. Here I'm focusing on the light duty gasoline. As you all know, Euro 6, Euro 7, and China 7 are still coming up. While we expect that Euro 7 will be introduced earliest in 2026 and China 7 probably a year later, we are expecting some news, hopefully, next month on the 20th. We should know what the emission standards are. At the same time, the commission has surprised us already several times because we were expecting it end last year, we were expecting it in April. Let's see if they really give us a target. If you look again in 2030, light duty gasoline vehicles in China, 16 million vehicles still there. In Europe, roughly 8 million vehicles. Very sizable numbers. What do we expect from the legislation? We expect, and this is on broad consensus with the market, that a reduction of 50% of the main pollutants. I'm talking here about, of course, the NOx, the carbon monoxides, and the hydrocarbons. Also there will be more stringent cold start requirements. There will be stringent legislation on the particles, both in number as well as in the size of the particles. There's going to be a requirement for secondary emission abatement. So you will be seeing secondary emission three-way catalysts coming in. From a system point of view, what does that mean? This means on a Euro 6 system, typically you have three bricks. If you go to new legislation, the loading on these bricks will increase going towards to the Euro 7. On top, we do expect additional bricks to come in. What does that result in? Well, this results in a minimum value uplift that we see for the gasoline section of 20%. On the heavy duty vehicle side. There, the timelines are more or less the same for Europe and China, with a big difference than in China. First, we will see for the HDV, the tier one and later on in the tier one cities, and only later on we'll see it in the entire country. Here, this is also still a market of more than 2 billion vehicles in China, 0.6 in Europe, large numbers. Also here, the focus, okay, we're talking HDD, it will be on reducing the NOx emissions under the best possible conditions while keeping fuel consumption low. Tighter particulates will also be there. Cold starts, increased durability. Trucks, the system will have to be able to sustain 1 million kilometer. Of course, we still also have the focus on lower ammonia and nitrogen oxide is also coming in. From a system layout, what does that mean? Well, basically, it means that we'll be transitioning from a one urea dosing system to a two urea dosing system, basically to manage that we don't get basically too much ammonia slip into the environment. The two dosing system will help with that. Ultimately, this will also result in an uplift of 20% in value. That is what we believe, and that's what we will see. If I combine all of this together, and now I'm switching actually from vehicles to catalysts. Here I'm really talking in volume of the catalysts. You see that there's still significant growth. With our projections, actually the market in 2030 is as big as it is today. Same size. Still very attractive. Yet the weight of the heavy duty vehicles is more outspoken than what it is in 2021. Automotive catalyst, emissions, emission abatement, a real technology business. Let me then also now explain a bit how we're going to do this. I'm going to now transition basically to the section where I'm going to explain to you how we're going to capture this value. Where are we going to play? We're going to capture the value by keeping our strong position in the light-duty gasoline. And we will continue the growth path tha t w e have started and the qualification that we have under the belt in the HD segments and therefore our market share will also continue to go up, both in Europe as in China. We're going to maximize the value. At Automotive Catalysts, the teams are obsessed about capacity utilization and process efficiency. We have always been in the past and will continue to do so. That means we have always been aligning our footprint, be it either with investments or plant closures in line with market developments, and this is what we're going to do. We're even going to put more focus on it. How? I'm going to tell you right now. Reliable transformation partner. The internal combustion is not out, so our customers will still need lots of these engines, and they will want somebody to be there for us in the long run, even when they are transitioning to battery electric vehicles. Guess what? Our focus will be, we are going to stick with our customers. We're going to do this with them side by side. How were we able to do this? Because we have already very long-standing relationships with these customers. With some we work more than 50 years. 50 years. This means that in our view, we're going to keep on serving them globally, and we will actually be delivering products to them from regional plants where their engine manufacturing is. We'll stay close to them. We're going to be reliable and credible. That means, as mentioned before, we're going to stick with them throughout the journey, throughout the transformation. Why is that important? Because, yes, we all know what the ultimate goal is. Yes, there will be, of course, electrification in the end. However, we don't know exactly how that road will be, and that means that we'll need to create visibility together. If the speed changes, how will we adapt? This is what we want to do, and that's why we are also developing and actually going into a different relationship in the sense that we want to create visibility for each other, work closely together, and be agile together as the market moves. Of course, we're going to remain a technology leader, not only to capture the value which is coming today and make sure our customers have peace of mind on the new legislation. We're also going to be there for them for cost reduction programs, unlock value for them, value for ourselves, and therefore actually value for the industry. Of course, clean air, sustainability is in everything that we do. As mentioned, we're going to enter into different type of relationships with our customers, much closer, much more partnership-like. It's not a coincidence that in some of the names that you have seen in Ralph's presentation are also some of our key customers today, because they feel that we're going to stick, and they feel that we're going to help them in their transformation. Innovation. I was a bit fast earlier on going to the innovation because maybe while I'm not a scientist, maybe I was too passionate about this topic. Also innovation, we do have a good track record. We have industry-leading benchmark technologies for gasoline engines, catalysts, gasoline catalyst systems, and that's why we have this solid market share. That's why we are so strong in this market. We are extremely strong in the GPF section, both in Europe and in China. We have been developing close-coupled GPF systems together with Volkswagen as an example. Also on the heavy-duty side, we are technological-wise competitive, and this is proven by our market share gains that we are experiencing right now, the platforms which are ramping up with our technology. Here as well, we have co-development for it with Scania, where we introduced together the first dual dosing system, which will be the standard for Euro 7. You have seen that coming on this slide earlier. Now, you're only as good as your last technology, right? You always have to keep on working on the future, and that's what we are doing. The good news is that we have the new technologies in place for Euro 7 and China 7, which are coming up right now. We've been working on reduced rhodium technologies, reducing palladium, and therefore introducing platinum in the mix to lower the overall cost of the system. Guess what? These technologies are running today on the road. We are qualified with global OEMs with our flex metal technology already today, so this is not a plan, this is reality. Secondly, we are now introducing the secondary emission three-way catalyst brick to avoid ammonia slip also for gasoline engines. The feedback that we're getting from our customers is just great. They're really happy with the product. It gives me confidence that this is also a brick which will be landing in our basket as we go to Euro 7. If I go to the heavy-duty diesel side, there we also have a very interesting develo pment. Actually, something unique that we have. Nobody else in the industry has it. This basically is our Umicore catalyst technology. What is this? We make our own substrates. Substrates made from paper substrate, basically, I should say. Of course, it's not the paper that you have right there. That is quite clear but it's fiber. It's fiberglass paper. If you say paper, that means it's light, right? Light means less weight, means less fuel consumption. If you imagine a monolithic ceramic-based substrate, it's heavy. It takes time to heat up when you start up the engine. The paper heats up very quickly. Cold start, very important. The engine has to perform less. Less fuel consumption, less harmful gases towards the environment. Lastly, also these substrates have less back pressure. Again, less fuel consumption. In HDD, it's all about TCO, so we're really enthusiastic about these products. I was also talking about durability. Huh? We go to 1 million kilometers now. That means that also your filters have to be washable. Despite that they have to be ultra-high filtration, they have to be washable. Basically, they get taken out after 200, 300 thousand kilometers, they get washed, and they have to still get that functionality. Sounds easy, difficult to implement but we have it. The next generation technologies are in our basket, and therefore we are confident for the upcoming Euro 7 and China 7 norms. Sustainability. I said it, we're talking about clean air, clean mobility. Of course, sustainability is part of what we do, how we think, how we breathe, and what motivates us. Also here, we look at ourselves first. We're focusing on reducing our own Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. Our plant in Bad Säckingen, for instance, is running on hydro energy. Our plant in Americana was designed with the eco-spirit right at the beginning in the team. They were passionate about it, and very proud to bring it also to the management board. It really lived into the organization. We've been talking about spent automotive catalysts earlier and what the proportion was in our refining business. Well, we have been refining and recycling a lot of these catalysts already for a long, long time, and these PGMs, therefore, go back into our products. That's not only great from a value point of view, it's not only great from a resource scarcity point of view but it also allows to lower the Scope 3 emissions of the entire value chain. I was talking about technology, and if you talk about automotive catalyst, you want to meet the emission legislation. At the same time, you also want to lower to the maximum amounts the PGMs that are required. Again, unlocks value for the customer, unlocks value for ourselves but also lowers Scope 3 emissions. This is all in the same spirit. We want to bring these emissions down. Géraldine mentioned it earlier, approximately 3 billion tons of NOx emissions are prevented by our products already today in 2021. For some, it's just a number. For us, it makes us proud and makes us get up in the morning and say, "We're making a difference," not only for our business but also for our families and the community in general. Excellence. All this is great but how are we going to do this right? I n the next chapter, I'm going to talk about the operational agility that we have and that we will focus more in the future but also about the mindset that we are going to implement or further implementing, and how we're going to switch our brain from technology and growth to really going to efficiency, cost and cash. We're starting that now, and luckily we have time because the market will still peak. Mentally, we're putting it somehow in three blocks, and of course, these are not exact hard periods but it's just to give some structure in our thoughts. In the short term, we were focusing on capturing the peak and growth. That means that we'll still have selected capacity investments, and we expect that our CapEx will be roughly 20% higher than in 2021 in that period. In the peak, you will see that as of 2025, 2026, our CapEx will start dropping below our depreciation level. In 2030, we'll be down below 50% of our depreciation run rate at that time. Capacitization. Over lunch, I had quite some discussions with some of you, and we are really passionate about capacitization. In the past and what we have been doing now. We will continue to align our operational footprints in line with the market developments. That can mean investment but also, of course, plant consolidation. Cost reduction. We still have to capture the peak. Technology is still extremely important in a first phase. We are still running our plants at full capacity or above 85%, so our cost base will be stable at the start. Yet today, we are starting with the efficiency programs. We're thinking much more end-to-end processes. We're introducing digitalization to be ready to go down in our cost curve already in the second stage and definitely in the final stage. That means that in the maturity stage, in 2030, we'll bring down our fixed cost or annual fixed cost with EUR 100 million compared to 2021. Our fixed cost in 2030 will be EUR 100 million lower than in 2021. A big number, and please do remember it. Net working capital. It's going to increase because growth is great. Unfortunately, you have to invest for it. It would be easy for Umicore if you could invest without the CapEx, I think, because that's a big topic in the room, it seems. Now, working capital will move up at start. Later on, it will start declining, not necessarily because our business is going down but because we assumed a normalization in the PGM prices, as Filip explained earlier. Ultimately, it will be 40% lower in 2030 than it is today. If we do all these things right, and we will do all these things right, we will be generating EUR 3 billion cash over the 2022-2030 period. In nine years, not 10, in nine years. These are all great numbers, and they all work well in an Excel sheet, and it's all very nice but you need people to do it. You need to act on it. That's why we have launched already half year ago, a cultural change program. We're going to transition, as I said earlier, from a growth technology or pure growth and technology mindset to a cost efficiency mindset in the end. It's a matter of perspective. Our colleagues are motivated by targets. They are motivated by what we measure and what we do. If we engage, we do it with passion. It's a matter of also transiting these minds, and that's where we're going to. Now, maybe something that I didn't stress enough during this presentation right now is that Automotive Catalysts is much more than just cash. It's much more just than revenues. We have a great talent pool. At Automotive Catalysts, we know how to talk to OEMs. We speak their language, we know their systems, we know their quality requirements, we have the network. That makes a hell of a difference for Ralph and also for my colleagues in fuel cells, because you really see these links coming up and you're talking to the same people. That means we also have a lot of talent, of course. That means that this talent, of course, will meet them still in the short term here at Automotive Catalysts. There's also a lot of talent that can help the growth of fuel cells and RBM, and we'll be launching active programs actually to move that talent basically from AC and Catalysis in the long run to either fuel cells and RBM. Also for our colleagues, there's a real good future ahead of us. If I now wrap this a little bit up, what I would like that I was able to pass to you is that we're going to capture the market peak. We're going to stay this leader in gasoline. We're going to go in the HEV segment, both in Europe and in China. We're going to be the reliable partner. We're going to be there with the customer. We're going to be side by side with them through this transformation. Innovation remains at the core of what we do, both in the short term but also for the cost optimization programs later on. Sustainability is really very close to us and also helps us growing every day of the week. We do have a plan and excellent execution. Let me remind you, EUR 100 million in fixed cost reduction in 2030, working capital going down by more than 40%, CapEx below depreciation level, 50% below actually in 2030. All this together, of course, will allow us to generate this EUR 3 billion cash flow, which I have been talking about earlier. We have great returns. ROCEs approaching 20% in 2030, and of course, still very solid EBITDA margins. I think, at least in my mind, I would like to conclude that this is a still very sexy, attractive business that gives me energy every day, and I would like to work with my colleagues on this one in the next 10 years to make this a real success. Thank you. Thank you, Bart. We are a little bit ahead of schedule, which is, I think, not a bad idea because something tells me that we will have quite some questions during this Q&A session. There are already a lot of questions lined up from the webcast. Let's see if you can do better here in the venue. Mathias, Bart and Ralph. I need a chair, Mathias? You see our flexibility is not only in our manufacturing system for CAM but also in the setup of the stage to be always to the moment. Good afternoon. Gunther Zechmann from Bernstein again. Just two hopefully quick questions. Can you give us a feel for how much you're looking to invest in the greenfield in the North American Rechargeable Battery Materials greenfield site, please? Secondly, just on the last point that came up, the EUR 100 million fixed cost reduction in the Auto Cats business. What's the cost split between fixed and variable costs in the business today, please? Yeah. Maybe you start with the last one and then we. I would say, 70%-75% variable. Coming back to the first question, what is the CapEx for North America? You have seen, Filip has said before from the EUR 5 billion or more than EUR 5 billion that we have said before, EUR 4 billion will be invested in the E&ST and the battery material side. I would say of that, if you would take around one quarter of that should be the North American number. Thank you. Good afternoon. Wim Hoste from KBC, also again. I have two questions, please. First, the discussion LFP versus NMC. I was wondering to hear your thought about LFP outside of China. I think there was a slide mentioning 25% globally market share for LFP and then 75% for NMC. So what's the regional breakdown of the market shares of the technology? And then also for your business in China, how profitable is it today versus the rest of the NMC operations? And also what's your kind of profitability outlook for that business? I think there's probably some fixing still to do on the pricing side, et cetera but could you maybe elaborate a little bit on that as well? Thank you. Yeah, starting with the first question on the, let's say, global LFP share. Yeah, we, let's say we estimate about 25%. We see that, it will be substantially higher for China. It's already higher right now. While of course also in the customer roadmaps there are certain mention about LFP for the other region. There are not established footprint and we at least from today's point of view, we also don't see announcement on established footprints. As we see that the different regions regionalize, and there's really a request on regionalization. We believe that the market penetration and market share for LFP in China will remain higher than it's for the other regions. There was a final question on pricing, right? There was a question on China. Yes, our China assets are currently still underutilized. As I said in our strategy for going forward with the customer programs, with the qualification, we see that our utilization will increase towards 2024. Then we have, let's say, clearly utilized plans which will then also bring us sufficient and the right returns. Hi, it's Riya Kotecha from Bank of America, and these questions are for Ralph. I'd like to understand your rationale for sort of seemingly increasingly focusing on the design to cost segment with the manganese rich versus the higher performance segment with high nickel. I understand that manganese rich is a bit more of a competitor to LFP, given the pricing per kilowatt hour. Is Umicore facing the decision to somewhat trade off margin for market share by entering into a bit more of the mass market? How confident are you that you can achieve the premium pricing, which was sort of discussed at the first couple of sessions with entering into segment of the EV market that's more price sensitive. Related to that, can you give us an idea of what mix you will have in terms of the manganese versus high nickel versus mid nickel? Yeah, I think for manganese rich, coming to your question on price sensitivity, I think you need to look at this from the total equation of the pricing from manganese rich, including the metals. Manganese rich, the nickel content is substantially lower than, for instance, for a high or even a mid nickel technology. So from a system, from a cathode material system point of view, so, it has clearly advantages, when it comes to the added value for Umicore. We do not see a major difference for that but, as I said, for the total system pricing. When it comes to shares right now between high and mid nickel and manganese rich, this is reaching out in, mostly in the second half of the decade. I said that we estimate manganese rich kicking off in mass production scale requirements after 2026 or in 2026 right now. It's a bit too early to preempt what the shares between high nickel and between mid nickel and manganese rich will be. We see growth in the nearer term, first of all, for high nickel but on the longer term also then the design to cost segment further evolving. Maybe I can add to that. It is not the case that we have decided to sacrifice the high nickel or high energy density segment for the sake of manganese rich. The manganese rich, the HLM applications are specifically designed to address what we design to cost market, which is a contender towards LFP. You have seen before that we estimate this market segment to be around 25% of the total market. As Ralph has laid out, from a customer side, OEM side, this is great because HLM has a cost of everything, including the metals, it's significantly lower and they will save money. Now from a Umicore side, our value creation part, the things we are doing with the metals, there is not such a significant difference. Even that we are entering that segment, we do not see a negative impact on our average profitability. Thanks. That's really clear. My second question is to do with the value chain localization of HLM. I understand that about 80% of the manganese sulfate and about 35% of the electrolytic manganese is still produced in China. How easy is it to relocate the value chain towards European markets? Yes, that's true that let's say a majority right now for the manganese is coming from China. We see also certain footprints coming up for manganese in Europe, for Euro Manganese ramping up about 2025 and others. There is also the possibility to go via manganese leaching, for instance, from the metal side. There are opportunities clearly to more regionalize the value chain also for manganese in the longer term. Thanks. Charles Bentley, Jefferies. A question I asked earlier was gigawatt hours to kilotons conversion. Can I get the answer to that one? You said earlier the CapEx intensity of the U.S. is gonna be lower than other regions. Is that just because of the efficiencies you've talked about? I mean, I guess if I think about cost of steel equipment, so on and so forth, surely is going up. Just kind of get a little bit more on that. Then one more thing that Filip said earlier was that the relationship between the CapEx intensity and working capital requirements no longer holds. I was just interested in why that n o longer is the case. 'Cause I guess previously you said kind of half to one and then obviously if we look at lithium prices, cobalt prices, nickel prices are all very, very high. You would think that's even more the case. I just anything more on that? Thanks. Yeah, coming to your first question to the conversion factor from gigawatt hours into tons right now. It depends, of course, on the technology to be applied but if you take between 1.2 and 1.5, this is a fair range. Coming to your question on CapEx efficiency and CapEx density reduction, this applies of course in every region where we do so. Yes, you have certain differences on construction equipment, on infrastructure in this area, depending on the country where you invest, this is clearly. But this roadmap is across the board and is applicable for all regions. Maybe I can add to that because I was answering that first topic. As we said, it's more a function of time than of region. When we are, as we said, our ambition of 2025 launching the North American plant, we will be at a more advanced stage in the standardized manufacturing system that we have than we had been couple of years ago when we started Nysa. That means at this point in time, there will be already a lower CapEx density. Later investments will have even lower CapEx density versus the 30% plan that Ralph has mentioned. Yeah, working capital equation. Yeah, the reason why this is maybe counterintuitive, because you would say the prices are going up of the metals, while we say, "No, that's not anymore the case." It's more or less than that with that the percentage is because we see that more and more we are able to convince our customers to carry some of those items on their balance sheets. Consignment models or other things like that. This is a tool that we are successfully using in the market. Hello, it's Nicola Tang again from BNP Paribas. Actually following up on that point you mentioned earlier, this like long-term security of supply of low-carbon nickel, I think you mentioned, and maybe on the lithium side as well. Can you talk a little bit about the agreements there? Is it you know secured volumes but flexible in terms of pricing? Then, you know, in terms of offering the closed loop to your customers, how do you reflect that in terms of price? Is it again a straight pass-through, and how exactly does that work? Then the second question was on the autocatalyst side of the business. Could you talk a little bit more about how KPIs for some of your employees are changing to now focus, you know, more on value and free cash flow rather than growth? I was curious, you talked about those new partnerships or new types of partnerships with OEMs. Could you explain a little bit more, I guess, what you're doing there and what it means in terms of visibility and contract structure? Thanks. Yeah, on the nickel contracts you mentioned right now, low-carbon nickel contracts, I think it's a difference. You're talking about low-carbon nickel transactions and you relate it also to nickel pricing. We have business models in place where, let's say, the metal price itself is a pass-through. It's not part of our value add. It's not a direct link here between the nickel pricing on the one hand, and also about the carbon footprint of the nickel on the other hand. It's nickel, it's lithium, as you mentioned, right? Lithium, as well. Yeah. Sustainable sourced cobalt. Absolutely. On the autocat, there were two questions, right? It was the partnership structure and the KPIs. Well, today our colleagues are always value-driven. That's one. That's the main KPI, and that's also the KPI that stays in place right now, because we still have to capture the peak, we still have to qualify the business. Of course, already today we have very strict targets in our operations. Capacity utilization, PGM efficiencies, the number of passes a product needs to go through the furnace, how can we increase that? These KPIs will stay. Now, of course, as we transit further, it will be really I mean, what is now the weight of our SG&A, for instance, in the overall? I mean, what's the R&D weight that we're going to have in our portfolio? How many, yeah, FTEs we really sometimes need in certain sections. These KPIs we're currently designing, and they will be designed in function, of course, of the strategy which we are now doing. Here we're at the start of the process, because we're focusing right now on capturing the peak. If we're now talking about these partnerships, that is much more to have an open discussion in the sense that, today it's mainly you qualify for a platform. Of course, there's some tolerance bands, for instance, on the amounts that you have to deliver. And basically, off you go with the market. In the future, this will not be so easy because you cannot really predict where the volume is going to be. You really have to talk, okay, how are volumes evolving and what is the consequence for your pricing, for instance. How are you going to deal with spare parts? How do I make sure I really get good visibility on your demand so I can optimize my footprint? I'm doing something wrong, I guess. Okay. I'm optimizing my footprint. It's your beard. It's my beard. Whoa. Okay, I'm looking dangerous, am I? Yeah. No, it's about if I want to have a high capacity utilization, I need to have a good visibility. It's a much tighter cooperation. As these platforms will last longer than typically four or five years, I mean, now we're talking seven, 10 years. It's frankly a different relationship and not just a rollover with continuous catalyst line. This will not be any more the case. Thank you. Jean-Baptiste Rolland, Credit Suisse. I wanted to come back on what you mentioned about co-investment, and I was wondering if you could give us a picture of what your ideal partner looks like, size, reputation, whether more of an OEM type or a battery supplier, whether potentially European or Asian. And if I'm correct thinking that for your future partners, that exit costs would probably be higher on your side than on the side of your partners, how do you intend to protect yourself? That's my first question. Second question with regards to technologies. I understand that you anticipate to extract the same value between manganese-rich versus NMC, regardless of whether mid-nickel or high nickel. Does this suggest that you have from the onset started to discuss returns and pricing in your discussions with your prospective clients you're in qualification with? I'm also, I guess, tying in with the co-investment model. How does this co-investment model sort of, I would say, change the traditional qualification process that you used to go through? Third question, in relation to your market share, if I heard correctly that you're aiming between 5%-10% of market share by 2030, I remember that BASF is aiming for 10% of market share by 2030 in battery materials. I'm not sure what is the critical size that's necessary to extract the most economies of scale but how do you intend to extract economies of scale in that business. Knowing that from the, I would say, by design, because as you point out, the localization model s ort of capped in nature, the economies of scale. How do you intend to extract these? Yeah. Let me answer the last question first because I think there's a misunderstanding we had in the discussion before. We said the global equation that we have in our capacity versus the market that we see versus the bottom-up customer demand. We think we are around 20% market share, right? We concluded before that this 20% market share could be higher but we deliberately want to prioritize value creation in front of growth. The roadmap, how do we come to that number, is not a top-down equation. It's a bottom-up accumulation of customer demand in a certain way that we think that we should be going forward. Now let's come back to the first question. What is the ideal partner? I think there is no ideal partner per se, and the partners that we have are great partners already because we're not starting from scratch, right? We have already announced a couple of those companies. Per se, we see that the value proposition to do such kind of partnerships is more on the OEM side. Now, when I say on the OEM side, it doesn't mean it needs to be an OEM who is partnering with Umicore, because you know that, the OEMs have different strategies how to integrate in the value chain. Some of them do the batteries themselves. Others invest in, maybe together with other OEMs in battery manufacturers. ACC is one of those examples where Mercedes, Stellantis and Total have invested together. At the end of the day, it's their vehicle to, you know, through which they are doing partnerships. I think for us, the market, we have three types of customers. First are these OEMs where we talked about the importance of partnerships. Second are battery cell players that are in the very strong ecosystem of an OEM, an example of ACC that we mentioned. The third, and still very important part, for us as customers are the cell makers themselves. If you want basically a degree of integration, partnership will be more on the OEM related side. On the cell related side, it will go more on our value proposition on the technology roadmap that Ralph has explained but also our reach into the value chain. These are different type of partnerships then. Your question is the costs of exit, aren't they more on our side than on the partner side? Here again, I repeat what I said before. A requirement for us is to have value creation, otherwise we wouldn't do a partnership. This also includes guardrails in terms of what if. This could be contractual, by mechanisms or by agreements, so that we would not be in a position to have a one-sided exit cost side, because this is never good for any kind of joint venture or activity if it's not a balanced approach going forward. Towards the question of qualifications, I think there are two elements of it. The integration of our R&D teams into the R&D teams of our customers. In that sense, those qualifications are different because there's a much more frequent and deep exchange on what is needed, and how this has to be engineered. From a pure quality point of view, because you do qualification, because you follow standardized process of quality assurance to mass produce certain things, we do not compromise on those processes, be it a joint venture, a partnership or a singular customer. This we will not compromise on in a certain way. But the R&D cooperation indeed has a much deeper character than before. Hi. Excuse me. Ranulf Orr, Citi again. Just a question around the capital intensity of the RBM business. Maybe you could start by giving an idea of what your average kind of CapEx per ton or gigawatt hour is. Then, following that, talk us through the journey and how you expect that figure to evolve over time. Under a previous management, the idea was presented that the greenfield investments are done and ongoing it should be up to 30% lower almost immediately. You're now saying 30% reduction by 2030. It's a lot further away. Secondly, on recent calls, you know, there were comments around technology step changes coming to manufacturing process that would also bring down the cost of CapEx. Yeah, capital intensity. Why is it only 30 and why does it not come sooner, I guess, is question one. Then just on technology as well, if you don't mind. Could you give an idea of, you know, are all your eggs in one basket now with solid state and your new partnership? What's happened to silicon anodes? Because they were previously fairly prominent in your materials but it's gone quiet. Thanks. Maybe you start on the technology side and I will answer then on the CapEx density side. Yeah. As I said, on the technology side, right now, we intensively working along the value chain between academics and also with OEM, with startup on the development. Cathode right now with our announcement to work closely with Idemitsu, we will accelerate on the catholyte side. We are also going in other areas like silicon carbide. Here we are not, let's say, more in an elaborative phase right now, like with other technologies, like we have, for instance for sodium ion, we have for this ordered rock salts. We are in parallel really on the one hand, monitoring, on the other hand, developing also the long-term developments. I think it's fair to say that solid-state batteries is on the most advanced side here. Maybe one comment also to the announcement that we have done to have this partnership on the catholyte. Catholyte is one street into solid-state batteries. That doesn't mean that we are stopping our activities on the cathode active material, the traditional CAM for solid-state batteries. In the opposite, we are accelerating that. What we had in mind is to partner with the best in the world, and we think that our partner is one, if not the best in the world, looking to the patent portfolio and technological strengths to unlock that next step, that next big thing that could be there in solid-state batteries if this catholyte. That's not closing doors or not putting all eggs in one basket. I just wanted to make that clarify that once more. Now coming to the CapEx density. Deliberately, we have not disclosed such detailed numbers on CapEx density because it's a very important aspect of our competitive position. You could take a result of the partnerships we have been able to do and the contracts we've been able to close, that our current CapEx density or the CapEx density that we are including in the offer forward is quite competitive. Now, why are we saying 30% towards 2030? This is because we also have scaled up our ambition, and we have scaled up our ambition in terms of footprints but then also, as I said before, the value chain integration. It's true, if you have a, o nce you have a greenfield and we have that now in Europe, we have that in Asia, the additional CapEx or the CapEx density will be more than 30%, even faster. We took an average number that takes into account our overall ambition that we have, presented here today. The silicon anodes. Yes. Silicon anodes is something that we have reached a certain position in, you know, in IP and in project or product maturity. You have seen that our plan going forward is an ambitious one. It is ambitious also in terms of CapEx. We have to make the decisions that we think are most value creative for Umicore. Today, we have prioritized in this plan on others. It doesn't mean that we will not, at one point in time, industrialize what we have created here, either alone or with partners. At this point in time, our focus is on the roadmaps that you have seen and that we have highlighted, and that's also part of our CapEx plan. Maybe some questions from the webcast. I'll take one question from the webcast and then we'll hand over to you. You mentioned a lot about significant footprint expansions. We saw that on the slide. To what extent is this based on contracted business? What we do, we are in continuous and advanced qualification with the different customers, with the different partners, and we will then have a staged approach to really transfer once we have the confirmation from the partner to realize and to translate this also in CapEx commitments. When it comes to the outer years, this is based on the top-down approach but not our approach, that of the customers. That means for our bottom-up approach, let's say, the capacity ramp up is. The execution of the capacity ramp up with, let's say, the CapEx commitment will come at this point in time when, let's say, we have final commitments, be it contracts with partners, partnerships, so with our customers and partners. What we said earlier today is also that if you just make the math and l ook to the over 400 gigawatt-hours in 2030 and if you mirror against that the ambitions that have been communicated already with our customers, we are already at around 50% of that 2030 ambition. Hi. James Hooper, Bernstein Research. A couple of questions. The first one is about the joint development of the batteries tech. So for example, as Ralph mentioned earlier in the presentation, roughly half of your 2030 capacity is already taken up. To what extent is that technology going into that capacity being agreed with your customers, and is it part of the joint development projects? Or are you still very much on the hook and paying for it for yourself, thinking through what technology is going to be required by the customers? The second question is about the cash profile of the auto catalyst business. The EUR 3 billion target for the next kind of nine years FCF makes sense but is this going to be more back-loaded towards the later years when you start to see the ramp down? 'Cause obviously with EUR 5 billion CapEx in the next few years, that might be, you know, when there's gonna be clearly some need to use the balance sheet in the next couple. Thank you. Maybe we start with. Yeah. Yeah, Yeah, when we're talking about joint developments going forward, that does not necessarily mean that we're talking about joint chemistry developments because this is our core of our competencies. It's joint developments when it comes to have specification and to integrate it really in the cell design. Here we are closely working with the OEMs, with our end customers, and this is what we said also the partnership directly have access to the OEMs is really accelerating to have the right specification and to have the right design. Let me make one more point to that. I'm not sure if we said it very clear in the discussion so far. When we talk about partnerships, that means partnerships to produce cathode active material and upstream integration. That does not include IP and technology that we have on the product side. All of the agreements that we are about to make and that we have made is absolutely securing the IP of Umicore. This IP will be valorized but is under our protection. I just wanted to make that sure. Partnership does not mean that we are diluting our intellectual property all over the place. No, that's very much concentrated in our. In that sense, we are also independent of these customers. Then there was the question of the cash flow profile. Yeah. Thank you for the question, because it also allows me to get across a message that actually I forgot to pass during the presentation, is that, while we do see the value peak in the market around 2024, I said, we expect that more end 2025, 2026. As we looked at PGM normalization at that point in time, and as only at that point in time the peak has passed, indeed it will be 2026 onwards that we really start seeing the big free cash flows. At the same time, we will continue to generate already quite substantial cash flows in, let's say, that stability transformation phase. Because the growth is happening in the next years but then, it will decline further to the end. Hi, this is Riya from Bank of America. Some of the OEMs, like Tesla, are talking about cathode flexibility to mitigate raw material volatility. Do you think that's sort of credible or, you know, practically possible? Are you having similar conversations with the other OEMs that you're seeking partnerships with? How does that fit in with the strategy of trying to sort of secure contracts and volumes when they seem to be looking for a bit more flexibility? Thanks. I think when it comes to cathode flexibility, of course, you can have, let's say with the OEMs developing technology roadmaps and qualification around different, cathode material formulation. You may be able between platforms then switch a little bit, forth and back. You have rather long qualification periods with the highest quality requirements. It's not really a commodity where you can plug and play and cathode material A in and B out and the other way around, because metal prices are fluctuating. I don't see this. Hi, it's Georgina from Goldman Sachs again. I've got two questions. One of them is you've got quite a different strategy in catalysts compared to your competitors, the two big competitors out there. Just wondering, you know, how you see that in terms of a competitive advantage. Is it easier to get the best talent in the market at this point already? Then my second question is your therefore like still being committed and leader in catalyst but also in batteries, is your go-to customer strategy evolving? Do you have, you know Ralph and Bart at the same kind of customer meetings? Is it EV or next generation catalyst? Should I take that one? Absolutely. Yeah. Indeed, I mean, we're pretty outspoken that we want to be the transformation partner and that we're sticking with our customers. Again, because the visibility in the market will highly vary. I mean, also for the OEMs. I think they're really looking for a partner to rely on and help them doing that transformational transition. We're convinced about that, and we're going to stick with that field. If you say then, do we work together with the same customers, Ralph and myself? Well, I'm coming from the battery side before, and Ralph is coming from the Auto Cat side before. It makes discussion really easy amongst ourselves. We're also already exchanging talent. To give you a concrete example, I think how long is it now? Nine months ago or something. The sales head of Automotive Catalysts actually moved to the battery material business because he has the network. He knows how to talk to these colleagues. Actually, I'm also receiving talents from the battery group because they bring this focus on how can we be more agile because the battery business is a bit more dynamic. They can learn in both aspects, and ultimately, we will have this indeed, talent, flow from one to the other, and ultimately, of course, from Catalysis to the battery. I really think it's an asset. Yeah. Also, coming back to the first part of your question, do you think it's a competitive advantage or is there any consequence out of the different positioning of the three main players? We think, yes, it is. Because if you imagine, and again, put yourself in the shoes of a car manufacturer, and you can choose whom to give the business. First of all, Company A that has only that type of business left and might be, you know, constrained into the future with that. I mean, in general, as a general statement. Or Company B that is actually trying to, in a certain way, carve out that business. It's not very clear what will happen. Maybe nothing but maybe something not good. Other than in the Umicore case, everybody knows what will happen because we and I used that word before, have skin in the game. We have future business on battery, we have current business on the catalyst side, and we have even more far-out business on the fuel cell side. We are there for the long run. The customers see that as well, and we see the first, you know, positive sentiment in that direction. Yeah. If I can add another concrete example. We have OEMs coming to us and asking, "How is your future revenue profile looking? If ultimately long-term, the cat business is going down, do you have other revenues? Because we need a partner." Then we see that the revenue stepped up in battery materials and recycling. It's gigantic. These OEMs paint these big eyes. Wow. I mean, this is really a differentiator. Again, I explained, that's why some of our partners at Automotive Catalysts are now also the partners of Ralph. Absolutely. Yeah. Over there. Exactly. The other way around. It's okay. Thank you. Sebastian Bray of Berenberg Bank. Can I come back to the 200 gigawatt hours, Mathias, that you mentioned as being covered by existing agreements? It comes back to the question I asked earlier this afternoon on how much of this is Umicore versus how much is the partners. Because the VW JV at the time it was announced late last year was up to 160 gigawatt hours or roughly that by 2030, if I remember. Stellantis ACC gave a figure of up to 46, I believe, was the number by the same period. If you add those two together, you get close to 200. Does the 200 include the 80 gigawatts of capacity, 80 gigawatt hours of capacity that Volkswagen would quote-unquote, "claim for itself" within that JV? Or is there an 80 gigawatt hour additional that you view as signed and is included within that 200? Just to be clear that when we talk about this, ambition of 160 gigawatt hours for VW, that means that the ambition of the joint venture to be created has a capacity of 160 gigawatt hours towards 2030, which represents around two-thirds of the demand of VW in Europe, which is around 230, I think, which was the number. The strategy is to secure this part of the supply for Volkswagen with this joint venture together with Umicore. All of this 160 gigawatt hours is in the joint venture and will deliver to Volkswagen. On the ACC side, it's the same logic with a little bit different setup. That's why I was referring to already those two partnerships, ambitions that have been set, give us already about 50% of the ambition that we have articulated. That was my logic that I have put forward. The 400 is not a pro-rata consolidated figure. It's a total of all the projects in which Umicore would be involved. Because my understanding of the Volkswagen project is that Umicore's share, quote-unquote, is half of that. It had. No, no. Okay. The way we are projecting it is as a capacity, including the full 160, not half of that, the full 160. The CapEx of EUR 5 billion is for all of the 160 or just for half of Umicore's or EUR 4 billion, pardon me, for half? It's only for the Umicore part of that, as we have said earlier. That's understood. When you say the 200, it's purely referring to the ACC and the VW announcement. Exactly. Exactly. Understood. Thank you. Just coming to the co-investment bit that you mentioned before. Looking at your cash flows, it doesn't look like you really need money from outside. You mentioned access to capital markets. You have debt and equity co-investments. Would the equation in terms of your locking in the pricing profitability margins change if an OEM or somebody had to co-invest with you? Is that some sort of quid pro quo that you're offering? Maybe let me answer the question by turning it around a little bit. The rationale for us to do this kind of partnerships, one element of that is co-investment. You're right that we have very strong cash flows, and we have financing means of different kinds. The more important thing for us are the other elements of that is to lock in or secure demand as well. It's a very good and a very significant side effect, if you will, that there is a co-investment. The ability to kind of, with a very high likelihood prescribe the future demand of the CapEx that you are investing and the strong and very close cooperation from an engineering and R&D point of view that you can imagine in such a partnership is much more open and gives us much more foresight on what this specific customer is needing. These are the key elements outside of it. So it's not. We are not doing this because we are at the mercy of the customers to get their money to make it. We're doing this, and as I said before, it was not a process we just decide, "Oh, now let's go do partnerships." It took us some time to accept also that fact that it is a strategic. It is actually a value up for us doing a business through a partnership so with an OEM versus doing it on a standalone basis. That's how we look at it. The positive side effect is the impact on financing. The second question is, as you said, 50% of your capacity is sort of spoken for in a way. How do you sort of come up with the other 50%? Is it already some sort of negotiations that are ongoing that might come to fruition? Absolutely. There, it's very important to if you can memorize again the picture that I've shown at the beginning with those four phases. We are now in the phase two. In this phase two, we are benefiting from the work that has been done in the last two years in working on high nickel chemistries. As we said, we are currently in what we call advanced qualification, so that's very far in the process. We have said that also a couple of months ago that we are in this process and that we would inform about good news on the way. ACC was one of the first or was the first announcement, and there will be more to come. There is a funnel, if you will, that will further go into 2022, 2023. This will be the two pivotal years to make that happen but then we'll start to fill the other half of the capacity. Can I just ask in terms of probability of the funnel, what percentage you're using? This is a very detailed question, probably. When we talk about this, we have a high confidence that it will happen but I wouldn't want to express this in a percentage. Thank you. We have a bit more time for a few questions from the audience, dialing in online. You talk a lot about the closer partnerships in the form of JVs or other partnerships. Are there any risks that Umicore could lose business with existing or even future customers who may not be comfortable with what could be seen as a lack of independence? This is a very good point actually, this is something that the customers are also addressing to me when I talk to them. What my feedback is at this point in time, of course this model has a limit. This model has a limit that we cannot do this kind of partnerships with unlimited partners. If you look to our ambition and the ratios that we have just discussed, you see that we have scoped our ambitions also in a way that we probably will not have 10 partners in this kind of way. It will be less of them. We will always make sure. What we are demanding on the one hand is value creation. The type of contracts and the type of agreements we are doing, we want to make sure that this creates value for Umicore. What we have to give, on the other hand, is an unrestricted attention of that activity towards the respective customer. We will not compromise for further growth if we are not convinced that we are able to serve our customers that we have selected or that have selected us. I think that's a very important point to do. We don't compromise on profitability and value creation, and we cannot ask our customers to compromise on excellence of execution and dedication of our teams. A question on the single versus multiple sourcing of cathode material. Recently we have been saying that customers have been shifting from typically single sourcing to dual or multiple sourcing. Has anything changed recently? If not, if it's still multiple sourcing, what is then the visibility that we have in terms of platform share? Yeah. I think for specific platforms, we do not see really multiple sourcing but we are, let's say, working on certain platforms with our customers. Usually these platforms are not shared, let's say, with different cathode makers. It's clearly dedicated platforms for, let's say, with our partnerships. Yeah. Just to make clear, it is a very big effort to do a qualification. It is impossible to say, "Oh, today the weather is like this, I change the cathode material supplier." It is a 2-3-year project that a lot of cost is involved. When we talk about multiple sources, then it is OEMs or cell makers work together with different and not only one cathode manufacturer. But on the selected platforms, it's very rare that you have this multiple sourcing because it will mean that you have to spend double the cost to qualify it if you do it from the beginning or even more if you want to introduce it throughout the running of the platform. When we talk about multiple sourcing, it is multiple sources, you know, over the portfolio of a customer but not in a single specific platform. Maybe that brings us again back to the partnership model, because that creates commitments for these platforms from both sides. Absolutely. Thank you. Time is officially up for this Q&A session, so we will take one final break of 20 minutes before we kick off the last set of presentations. We will be reconvening at 4:15 P.M. U.K. time. Thank you. Very good. Thank you. I'm back, and let's go now back to the future. For the one that was part of the eighties, that might still mean something. Let's now talk about another part of mobility transformation, which is called fuel cells. Actually, this is a business that maybe flew a bit under the radar here, maybe in your view at Umicore. It's a business actually where we are pretty successful in it. Right now, we would like to explain a bit more on what we are doing here at Umicore and why we think that fuel cells, especially towards the end of the decade and definitely beyond, will be an important business for us and an interesting business, and that we're starting from an excellent position today. In good tradition, let's start with the market, because that's where everything begins. In general, one can say that there's a strong regulatory support both in Europe and APAC for a hydrogen economy. We have carefully studied the full value chain, the hydrogen value chain, and we came to the conclusion that for Umicore, the area where we want to play, the area where we want to capture the value and where we think the value is, which is also very close to what we know very well, is actually the proton exchange membrane fuel cell catalyst. I will abbreviate that throughout the presentation, just fuel cell catalyst but then I'll be talking about this specific type of catalyst. If we now have a look at the market, the market's already 7 tons today. Small but yet it's already on a ton scale. It's growing to 19 tons, 990 tons in 2030. We see that the heavy duty vehicle section is the largest portion, typically long-haul heavy duty vehicle, so the big loads, stuff. There's also a light duty vehicle section, and there will also be green hydrogen electrolyzers. Now, if I start off by explaining where we are and what we're going to do in fuel cells. We intend to capture the near-term growth in fuel cell mobility. The mobility section, as you saw in the market, is the biggest section, and that's also where we are strong today. We're going to capture that growth, both in the long-haul heavy duty but there's also mid duty and light duty out there. We're going to further expand our footprint, our production footprint, and we're going to maintain our technology lead and further develop for the next generations. There's also adjacent markets and adjacent opportunities, and for us, green hydrogen electrolyzer is an adjacent opportunity, and we will use our knowledge, our developments from the mobility segment also for these adjacent markets. Here as well, we want to be a reliable transformation partner, and I'll make it concrete for our fuel cell business. We're going to work on our footprints and our processes. Reliable transformation partner. We all, and everybody probably has a different view on how the future will look from mobility. Yes, there will be electrification. Yes, there will be combustion engines. Yes, it will differ regionally but there will also be fuel cells. They are complementary, for instance, to battery electric vehicles, especially in the heavy-duty segments. Also our heavy-duty vehicle customers see this, that we now also have the fuel cells, and we have of course the battery electric vehicles in our portfolio. Why are we reliable? We're in this business since 1990, so over 30 years. We even have been in MEA production. We did that around 2006, and we left actually again that space a bit later on because we felt actually this is nothing for us. This is not where we want to be. I think we think the value is more on the, on the PEM fuel cells. I would even say more. If you would look at the value chain today, we see that our customers, the OEMs, actually want to move upstream. They want to design their own plants, their own stacks, their own cells, and design their own MEAs and even CCMs. Our strategy is to work with all actors in the value chain. We're working with OEMs, we are working with the cell makers, with the MEA makers. Really, we try to tune our products in function of the components or the design that our OEMs are having. We're listening to our customer, and the customer says, "You focus on the chemical side. That's where you are strong. That's where we need you. We'll do the assembly, the design. That's where we are strong." We also have focused very early on partnering and developing actually fuel cell technologies together, and we did that successfully with Hyundai Motor Company. That's why we're already at mass production scale also here in this field, and we have a sizable plant in Korea. Now, we also have news today, and you might have read it already, is that we're going to make another investment. Besides our footprint in Germany, in Korea, we're going to build the largest fuel cell catalyst plant in the world, and we're going to build it in Changshu, in China, in the Suzhou district. This plant will be online by the end of 2024 and will guide us in our growth, help to serve our customers towards 2030. I talked about the Hyundai Motor Company cooperation, and we have already with our product more than 10,000 vehicles on the road. We left the lab, right? We're not designing. We're still designing for the future but we're on the road today, and we're producing already at ton scale. It's good to have a customer. It's better to have a lot of customers. We can say that we are qualified with the 10, more than 10 OEMs worldwide. If you would wonder, yes, indeed, the big names are on there, both in Europe, North America but also China. The big heavy-duty names are on those slides. All these bubbles that you see on these slides, they represent start of production dates. You see, for instance, HD, definitely heavy-duty vehicle application. You also see the SOFC stack and light duty. We're really working on the all segments and the different steps in the value chain. You see that we have quite some qualifications in China and that they are coming first. Later on, we'll also be seeing a lot of volumes coming in into Europe. It's quite natural, and I should not say only Europe, actually the rest of the world, because we have customers beyond Europe. Naturally, as the volumes and the demand is kicking in the strongest in China, it's natural to build our plant over there, and that's why we have chosen this location. These are start of production dates. We have further ongoing qualifications with more customers and for more future platforms. It's fair to say that with a 14% market share in the mobility segment already today, not a bad starting position. I talked about our footprint. We have production in Hanau in Germany, we have Korea, and now we'll also have Changshu. We also have applied tech and R&D centers, mainly in Europe and Asia. Because I said we want to be close to our customers, we want to develop together to design the right stuff for what they need. We want to listen, and you have to be close. Secondly, we're going to leverage our experience in the fuel cell industry or I should say, experience in the precious metals industry that we have also for our fuel cell business. It's quite similar to what we do upstream in the AutoCat side. We're closing the loop. Yes, we can recycle fuel cells. Small quantities today but the plant is ready to take them in. Innovation remains important. We have a very strong position today but we have to keep it because this market is growing end of 2030, growing into 2040. I will show you on the next slide some metrics where we are compared to our closest peers and industry average on certain important components. If you look, for instance, at efficiency, our fuel cell catalyst at the start of the run, so when you use for the first time the fuel cell stack, the customer immediately gets a 3% hydrogen efficiency. Basically, you consume already 3%. We're talking here HDV market, so every percent is important. Durability. This stack has to last a long period of time, 10,000 cycles, ideally. At the end of the run, we even have higher efficiencies, and we definitely have the number one durability in the market. This is based on feedback from customers. I mean, they analyze the different specs, they show results, and we really always come out on top. On the platinum loading, compared to the general industry, we're 25% lower for the same performance. That means our customer can either increase the performance with the same amount of platinum or have the cheapest stack. That all turns into a great cost reduction potential for our customer from the stack point of view and therefore fuel cell adoption but also in the total TCO of it. The TCO, the total cost of ownership, will be key for fuel cell adoption, which is expected in the second half of this decade, especially for HDV. This is an important driver. As said before, we have great technology today but we are already working on the future. Because 2030, the game is only really starting. Our focus here mainly is on PGM reduction in our catalyst. That's where you will have the technology edge. How can you lower PGMs with the same or better durability and efficiency? No wonder that we spent a lot of time on research, that we create IP, and that basically we have more than 250 patents. We have 6 locations where we work on apply tech and R&D but we also are open to work with leading academia and universities in this field because we want to stay and keep that edge. Sustainability. Clean mobility, sustainability, I said it also in the AC section, that is what we live for and that is core of every offering that we do. We're focusing on ourselves first. What can we do on the Scope 1 and Scope 2? We're designing the plants from day one, so also the Changshu plant, to have the lowest possible CO2 footprint right from the start. The closed loop, again, will in the future also contribute to lowering the Scope 3 emission and help in resource scarcity. Because I showed you a market of 300-400 tons of fuel cell catalyst towards 2040, right? This is a lot of platinum. If you want to serve that market, you will have to bring down that platinum level. It's value unlocking for the customer, for ourselves, and Scope 3. Same story as for automotive catalyst. With our product on the road, while maybe other companies are still in the lab, the vehicles that are on the road today already allowed us to avoid basically or prevent. I should say probably, based on what the sustainability department would tell to me, 150,000 tons of greenhouse gases. Maybe not massive but we're talking here about fuel cell vehicles, and in that space, this is truly impressive. On the excellence part, I will talk about our new investment and also the fact basically that we already have proven production capacity at scale. Remember, the total market in 2021 was 7 tons. Mainly mobility, we have a 40% market share. You can read that, of course, we are at ton scale, and there are not many companies out there that are at ton scale because they're still in the lab talking about what they're going to do. Of course, these latest cost competitive processes are now also incorporated in our new investment in Changshu. This plant will be modular. If the market would be bigger than what we expect, we could easily add more modules and of course at a relatively more modest CapEx. By the way, I don't know if I said it already but this will be the biggest fuel cell catalyst plant in the world. If I just wrap it up. We want to capture the short-term growth in fuel cell and beyond 2030, of course, we want to capture the big markets. We're focused right now mainly on mobility. However, we don't ignore the adjacent markets. We don't ignore those. We're going to be reliable because we were long in the business and we're going to work closely with our customer, and we'll be part of the full clean mobility offering that we have as a group. We're leading on technology, and our focus is there to stay there, and we have a clear roadmap to do it. Sustainability is at the core of what we do. We have left the lab, and our production producing already at mass production scale. We think that we have a head start, and we can say that we're already profitable in this business today, and that over the 2022, 2023, 2030 period, we will be value accretive. Again, a small gem at Umicore. We have to foster it, grow it but certainly towards 2030 and beyond with a lot of potential. Thank you. Kurt, welcome. Another future business that we will see. Thank you, Bart. Thank you. Good afternoon. I have to start by really thanking you here, thanking everybody online. This has been a long and, I think, very informative day. Nevertheless, I know after two years of being 8-10 hours in front of a PC screen at home, how hard it is. Thank you for being online. Thank you, colleagues, following us here on this exciting day. Indeed, I have the honor to accept a small gem. I like raising teenagers at home, and I like to raise teenage businesses in Umicore. I like to bring them to life, to grow them, and then hand over when the time is right. I'm here today to close the loop in good tradition of the company, and that's also what I'm very passionate about. I'm going to really guide you through the journey of Battery Recycling Solutions in the next half hour. I will start by explaining why battery recycling matters, and I will explain how we will do that. Last but not least, try to wrap up and print some key messages in your head before you first enjoy a drink and then you go home. I'm kicking in an open door when I'm saying that the market of end-of-life batteries ready to be recycled is growing dramatically in the next decade. That is true. However, how the business models will develop on how these end-of-life batteries will come to our plant or come to the company, there is still some debate, some discussion, and really some different business models are being discussed. I would like to stress that there is also a market pull, because from a regulatory perspective, new batteries will have to contain a recycled content in the future, and that will actually also create clear demand for battery recycling and a need for that. Now, end-of-life batteries is an interesting market but underlying in the next decade, there's also production scrap. There is a huge battery industry emerging in the world, and many people challenge me off and on, how is it possible that so much scrap is being generated? Now, frankly speaking, if you look at it proportionately, the amount of scrap to be recycled for me as a recycler is huge compared to the end-of-life batteries. In the end, battery industry is preparing now for future electromobility and I'm getting the batteries at end of life that were put on the market 10 years ago. There is a huge baseline difference. What does this mean for me or for Umicore? Well, we have to first of all prepare for a very flexible and mixed feed. Secondly, we have to be capable to manage flexibility. Today I'm getting maybe a much higher fraction of production scrap, and tomorrow I'm getting modules or packs, and I have to be ready for that. The technology that I will apply will have to be robust to cope with that flexibility, and it has to be fast scalable. You saw the numbers until 2030 but look at what happens beyond 2030. The recyclable volumes are going to triple in the five years beyond that. In other words, I'm preparing a mass scale or the company is preparing now a mass-scale technology that is going to be scalable to accept these huge volumes beyond 2030. The graph is also showing the geographical split of the volumes. No surprise here as well. The biggest volumes you see in China. China is the region with the highest battery manufacturing today, and in absolute terms, also the highest electric vehicles in the market. By consequence, this is a very important market. Look, however, at Europe and the U.S. These markets will develop very fast and will form 45% of global volumes. As mentioned, the next decade we need to be ready to accept quite a bit of production scrap. Around 2030, 2031, we really see a flip, a turnover and end-of-life volumes take the majority of the volume then. Recycling is absolutely crucial in the mobility transformation for very, very different reasons. I would like to stress, first of all, that recycling will help to reduce the need for virgin raw materials. Every atom that we can recycle or that we can gain back through recycling is an atom that we don't have to mine. That's of course the first and foremost reason. On the other hand, every atom that is being recycled is an atom of known source. It's 100% traceable, so we can really confirm what the origin is. In that context, you heard a lot about a battery passport being developed. U micore is a very strong supporter of that and is introducing this concept in the industry. Last but not least, recycling will really help to develop the regional supply chains because natural resources are not equally spread all over the world, so certain regions will definitely focus on recycling for geopolitical reasons. Recycling is also important from ESG perspective. Through recycling, like Géraldine mentioned, through recycling, we can reduce the environmental impact of the battery supply chain. I'm often explaining to people who really ask, "Why is this now, this energy? What is happening?" Well, very fundamentally, what is happening is that we are on the world, we are changing single-use fossil energy resources by multiple-use mineral resources. O n the largest scale, this is what's going on. But of course, multiple use of metal means you have to recycle. What are the requirements to be successful in battery recycling? I try to split in three blocks. The first block is everything about the process, production process. We need a process that is capable to reduce the sheer volume, the sheer size of what is coming to us, and we have to reduce that mass and volume as soon as we can. The process needs to be able to extract the metals, the critical metals, with a very high yield. Of course, from an ESG environmental impact view, this is important but it's also important from an economical point of view. The more you extract, the more value you can recover. The process has to be flexible because you need to treat a wide diversity of mix, of feed mix and it has to be sustainable. I will get to that in much more detail later in my talk. A recycling process yields also a product. For battery recycling, we are in a very strange situation. Today, for cobalt, for nickel, and very soon for lithium and nickel, the volume coming out of recycling will be too big to be accepted in any other application for these metals. What does this mean? You have to produce a product that has a battery grade. The quality requirements are very high. That's what we have to produce. This is really the contract that I have with Ralph and his team. For less, we don't go. The way we do that is actually focusing on efficiency. I need to come up with a product that is capable to kick into the virgin raw material flow of our colleagues of cathode active material production as soon as possible. Because let's not forget, let's see things in perspective. The next 15 years, the virgin raw material flow is going to be bigger than what comes out of recycling. If I want to enjoy cost efficiency scale effects, I have to be capable of bringing these atoms as soon as possible in that virgin flow. Thirdly, recycling is about services. We offer a service to our customers. Are we going to present ourselves in the market as a total service provider? We are there for the different raw materials in a different business model, as is required by the different type of customers. We have, in the meantime, a Umicore closed loop operating system. Reminds me even a bit of Microsoft. Basically what we are doing is we are offering an administrative system for our customers that allows them to demonstrate that they comply with regulations, which is quite important in this recycling industry. Last but not least, when you recycle, when you receive packs at end of life, you learn a lot about mistakes that have been taken in design. I invite all of you, if you are ever around in our battery dismantling competence center in Germany, and have a look what is needed to open a pack. This is not designed for recycling. What is the consequence? It takes time, it takes cost, and the TCO of the battery usage is higher. That's the feedback loop that we want to establish with our partner OEMs. They appreciate that. We have ongoing running R&D programs where we help them to give input and make easier to dismantle battery packs. How are we going to take this on in the next decade? Umicore is an absolute front runner in this industry. We can start from a model that works. We are recycling today. It's a matter of scaling up now. We are going to do this first in Europe, and we are going to roll this out further in North America. We have a plan to build a 150,000-ton treatment plant in 2026. This will be the biggest battery recycling plant in the world. We are going to use a technology, a combination of high-temperature pyrometallurgy and hydrometallurgy. I'm going to explain to you later on why we take this equilibrium and why we combine these two technologies. This is a proprietary technology that we worked on for more than 15 years. It is applied today, and now we're going to scale. We are going to do this for different input materials. End-of-life batteries are obviously the focus but we have also a service to deliver now to people that need to recycle their battery scrap or their production scrap. How are we going to do that? You already know by now, RISE is going to help us. RISE is going to be the handrail of how we do things. We are already a reliable partner for car OEMs. When we initiated our battery recycling operations more than a decade ago, one of the targets and one of the objectives was to certify the battery packs that the car OEMs were bringing to the market at that moment in time already. Battery recycling is not new for us. I still recall in 2006, I went to a battery show and my colleague for battery recycling was joining me. That was the first appearance for battery recycling. This is more than 15 years ago. We learned a lot. We made mistakes but we learned from mistakes. In the last couple of years, we've really worked hard, tirelessly hard on the technology to improve it, to improve efficiencies, to improve also the practicability and to improve the scalability. With this experience, our presence is currently demonstrated with more than 15 running commercial partnerships, both for car OEMs and cell makers. In the course of the second half of this year, we will start to implement the improvements that we've prepared for our scaling up. Improvements focus a lot on recycling efficiency, and I'm actually extremely proud to say that for lithium, we have now received the highest recycling efficiencies with our technology, and this will prove to be market leading if you compare that with other options in the market. I would like to stress how important it is that we close the loop for battery recycling in the transformation exercise that is going on with our strategic partners. There is a huge uncertainty about supply of critical raw materials. With our battery recycling offer, we can reduce that anxiety and that uncertainty on the raw materials. In that sense, we form actually a strategic partner both on the upstream. They know us in the meantime from cathode active material production, and that we can refine these metals. In the meantime, they know that we are a trusted and reliable partner for battery recycling. Innovation goes really to my heart, as some of you probably well know but I like really when science meets business, and that's where we actually excel. We have chosen for the right arguments, for fundamentally good arguments, for a combination between high temperature and hydrometallurgy for our process. Being a chemist, I see no way how you can ever treat an end-of-life battery, which is a hazardous chemical factory and how you would make out of that waste a high-quality cathode material unless you use a high temperature step and a chemical purification step. Without that combination, we will never get there as an industry. Let me spend two minutes on what we do and what we see that others are doing, and where we maybe have the same approach and where we differ. On the left side, this is the process that Umicore is going to apply, and on the right side, I try to generically explain what others are doing. We both have to start by making an assessment of what we get in our plant. A pack is not necessarily very safe. You do not necessarily know the health, and you sometimes have to discharge that. So there are a number of manipulations, pretreatment step that are equal for all of us. The Umicore process starts with a high temperature process, which means that we don't have to dismantle or crush or make powder out of that. It goes right away in a high temperature process. Remember, you have to reduce the weight and the volume as soon as you can. Other companies start to have different processes, either or not with an intermediate temperature treatment, shredding, mixing, powders, separation. After all this being happened, you end up with a black mass, and in the end, from my point of view, battery recycling still has to start. At the left side, you see less stuff happens there. You have a pyro step complemented with a straightforward but shorter hydrometallurgy. We do things fast and good with the pyro, and then we basically clean up and do the very last steps to make battery grade with hydrometallurgy. I would like to give a couple of very telling numbers. If one truck of end-of-life batteries enters our plant, I need one truck of reagents to clean up all the way the critical metals to battery grade. If one truck enters the other process, people need four trucks of reagents to enter their plant to get to battery grade. This, of course, translates into an environmental impact, as we will see later on. Umicore's technology is really looking at an optimal balance between high temperature and the selectivity of hydrometallurgy. The technology is proprietary, it's protected in the meantime by over 20 patents of which 15 have been granted worldwide. Why have we now chosen for this technology? There is a lot of discussion in the market about that, and I want to set the record straight with this slide. The technology gives us input flexibility. I think it covered this already a lot. The reason why we have to do it and how we manage that. It's thanks to the robustness of pyrometallurgy. Secondly, the process needs to be effective. It has to be reliable, robust, scalable, and very efficient. Like I mentioned already, I'm extremely proud that for lithium recovery, we are reaching industry-leading recoveries. For the chemists around, you in the meantime know what kind of strange element this is of the table of the elements. The investments and the cost of the technology are striking. A detailed benchmark has revealed that we can invest for the same amount of input material at roughly 20%-30% cheaper than alternative treatment ways. Like I mentioned, every truck that needs to come to your plant needs to be paid. We can do this at probably around one-third lower OpEx. Combining high yields with lower investment costs and lower operational costs, this is an audience that I don't have to explain that this creates the highest value potential. Last but not least, the environmental impact of this process is better than any other alternative we see in the market. I'll get to that in even more details. Regulation is ambitious. Battery regulation in Europe is setting the pace and other regions are copying the targets. The table on the right gives you an overview of what's currently under debate and will be decided and signed off, voted towards the end of this year. The number of batteries that will need to be recycled has to increase, so there is clearly a market for battery recycling. If you look at the regulatory details that are being specified, the metal recovery efficiency of a recycling process is going to be specified. You will have to meet that hurdle. The governments, the regulatory bodies, really force people to use best available technology, and this is what we do. Like I mentioned, this is for cobalt, this is for nickel, this is for lithium. Not a coincidence that these elements are specified because these are the value drivers in battery recycling. The targets that are currently under discussion for 2030 are ambitious. 95% for nickel and cobalt, and 70% for lithium. The technology we have chosen is future-proof. We have today demonstrated, we are demonstrating in our plant that we can meet these targets. Sustainability. Really a very important differentiator for Umicore. The most important element in the overall life cycle analysis for battery recycling is the CO2 emissions. Allow me to take a couple of minutes to explain this because here as well, there is a completely wrong perception in the market. We have studied in depth with external partners and using the ISO 14040 guideline. I'm giving this detail because it is really important. This ISO guideline dictates you to let these studies validate by a third party, which we did. We used the Öko-Institut to do that. The results of our study, of our life cycle analysis for CO2 emissions is the following. We compared three different processing technologies. Umicore technology, an intermediate temperature hydromet treatment, and a full mechanical hydrometallurgy treatment of batteries. What is the result? CO2 emission per kilogram module input, apples-to-apples comparison. Our technology shows the lowest CO2 impact of the three different methods. But look at the details between Scope 1, Scope 2, and Scope 3. First conclusion, the energy requirement, so Scope 2, is almost the same. We do a little bit better than the others but it's almost the same. Completely wrong perception in the market because people say, "You do high temperature, you're using a lot of energy." Wrong. We use the energy that is already in the battery. That's what we do. Look at Scope 1. Our Scope 1 is biggest of all the technologies. We take a commitment, a responsibility to go to zero, and it's in our control. In 10 years from now, this will be about zero. The light blue is a different story. The light blue is, of course, the CO2 that is in those trucks that arrive in your plant. This is something that is far more difficult to decarbonize. This is where the wrong perception lies. People see. When they come to us, they see a stack but they have forgotten that there are four stacks at the chemical plants that indirectly arrive when you use reagents. Battery recycling is actually the best way of responsible and circular sourcing. It's under your control, it's a second resource, and we can reduce the CO2 burden for the products of Ralph to the highest extent. This is a huge lever to decarbonize the battery value chain. Last but not least, it's fully traceable. There is a lot of debate about where things are coming. I always like the things that I control really myself, then there is no question about that. Excellence and execution. We still have a long way to go. We do battery recycling for close to 15 years. If you look at the volumes, we have a challenge in front of us. Thanks to the experience of our operations right now, we are confident that we can scale to a 150,000 ton unit. This is roughly a scale factor of 50. The engineering team feel comfortable about that. They feel comfortable because we have experience in those pyrotechnologies at that scale. Oops, sorry that was fast. We start from our existing presence in Europe, and we are going to roll out a similar model in North America. We will follow there the market as it will grow. During that growth phase, we clearly see a synergy between our activities in Europe and North America. The engineering track for the 150,000 ton unit is on an accelerated path, and I really like this kind of engineering CAD/CAM designs rather than the artistic renderings that I often see in a lot of announcements. Talking about excellence. We kind of have to combine water and fire here in this closing the loop exercise. What we get is hugely variable in composition, in chemistry, in shape, in format. In the end, what we need to produce as a cathode material has to be, quality-wise, billet flat. How do we merge these things? We merge these things through experience, competence and skills. That's what we excel at. We're going to apply these to create a reliable industrialization path for our customers. This is what we commit to with the team. Let me come to the conclusion slide. With Battery Recycling Solutions, we are going to really capture profitable growth in the next decade. The market is going to grow fast. We are going to scale up from Europe by building a first 150,000-ton unit. Like I mentioned, I hope I could convince or I hope I could explain why we opt for high-temperature hydrometallurgy combination. The most important thing, battery recycling is. In the end, it's a service that we need to provide to our customers. Service means you have to be service-minded. You have to be able to accept what is available, what comes to you, and you take a burden out of the hand of your customers. That's really what we're going to focus at with the team, scale with them and offer them the service they need. With that, I think we get to the Q&A session. Yes, indeed. Thank you, Kurt. Bart will be joining you again for the final Q&A session, Mathias as well. After that session, we will have the closing remarks of Mathias before formally ending today's set of presentations. First question over here. Hi, Geoff Haire from UBS. Just wanted to ask Bart, who are your customers in the fuel cell business? Are they OEMs? Are they people like Ballard and Plug Power? The other question I had was why not build battery recycling in China given it's the biggest market? You said that in your presentation. Just on the European plant, how difficult is it gonna be to get environmental approval to build and scale up the plant, I assume, in Olen, given obviously the issues that have been around the Hoboken recycling plant? Thank you. You start. Yeah. Okay. I cannot give you concrete names but I think if you saw the funnel that I was presenting with the start of production dates, you have displayed the HD, the SS, et cetera, I think, et cetera. Yes, indeed, it's OEMs. I mentioned it's really leading OEMs in that sphere in China and rest of the world but there were also stack makers there. We're really focusing along the value chain indeed. Thank you for the questions, Geoff. Why not a battery recycling plant in China? Maybe I focused a bit too much on that but you know we have certain activities in China already with our joint venture partners. Battery recycling is part of the scope. We will, in China, of course, leverage these capabilities there. I didn't really put too much stress on that but this is an existing capability that we already have there. On the environmental side for a smelter in Europe, well, it's a fact that regulation is stringent. This is true. If you look from an overall emissions point of view, I really dare to say that a smelter on total emissions is even better than a lot of the alternatives that I see coming up right now. I mean, the technology is designed to meet regulation. We know what the targets are, and I'm convinced that what we have currently developed will meet these requirements. This being said, permitting or the speed of permitting is not always in every country the same. That's for sure going to be one of the key criteria that we will apply in a site selection exercise. I want to also be clear, we didn't say that this will happen in Olen, right? This is, you know, one part of the project to find the right location. In Europe, o f course. Hello. It's Nicola Tang from BNP Paribas. I wanted to ask a few more around battery recycling. Firstly, I think you hinted at potentially expanding in North America at a later date. I was wondering whether that was something that's factored into your EUR 5 billion, greater than EUR 5 billion CapEx guidance. If so or if not, should we think about the capital intensity to be similar to what you've talked about with this European investment that you're making, so the EUR 500 million for 150 kilotons? The second question, you painted a very exciting picture about your technologies on the recycling side and how it, you know, is really superior to peers. Would you consider licensing it out at all or not? Let me take the first question. The second is then for Kurt. No, it is not included in the CapEx yet, and you have seen that the primary market for that will be Europe, and we are focusing on that right now. We wanted to express is that when we select a site in North America for our cathode material production, we want to make sure that this is already enabled to have a full closed loop set up going forward. All of our concentration right now is on Europe to build the world's largest battery recycling facility. The plans are not as concrete as that yet for North America. To make that clear. In terms of CapEx density, I think the same applies for battery recycling that we said earlier for cathode material. It's more a function of time versus location. The second battery recycling facility we will build, our ambition is to have even less CapEx density because we include all the lessons learned and the improvements that we had from the first one. Yeah. Indeed. On the question of licensing, I've never say never in life. The clear priority is to roll out our Battery Recycling Solutions independently. That's for sure. The question is why should we? Yeah. That's right. Yes. Good afternoon. Wim Hoste, KBC Securities. Three questions from my side, please. The first one is on the yields, the recovery yields. I think on battery recycling you showed some percentages of lower capital intensity, lower OpEx, et cetera but the recovery yields of the metals you showed the 95%, I think, on lithium was mentioned. Can you compare that to peer technologies and at least what you know or what is available of the peer technologies? How are you scoring versus them? The second question is do you have already offtake agreements for recycling, battery recycling kind of promises from potential customers? And how important is it in the overall discussions in for cathode business this recycling option or availability that will come on stream? The last question is on the availability of metals, be it recycled or virgin. Is there any threat, and on what materials is there potentially a threat in your electrification roadmap, all the details you showed, from shortages of materials or metals? Thank you, Wim. That's a lot of questions in one shot. We rehearsed that for you, right? On the recycling efficiencies, like I mentioned, we are future-proof, regulation future-proof. This is telling a lot. Compared to peers, from our analysis, this is best in the industry. This is really best in industry for all the critical metals, be it cobalt, be it nickel, and definitely for lithium. I'm even proud about what we can achieve for lithium. On the availability of metals, let me take that one first. It's a fact that the transition will require a lot of metals. This is really clear. But on the other hand, there are huge number of projects ongoing to increase the availability of metals. I personally see more like a temporary imbalance, let's say, in, for instance, mining or transformation or refining. In the end, that's really going to be. I think this is going to turn out fine. Thank you for the second question. Actually, it allows me to stress again that we are already a battery recycler. I think this is overlooked too often. We have existing customers. Like I mentioned, we have over 15 running contracts with car OEMs, with cell makers. I mean, it's not about promises. This is an existing business already. We start from a very small level, and we're going to scale now in the next decade extremely fast. One thing is, what customers are these? Tell us the names just to anticipate this question. There is one name that we can tell you. We have already announced it. This is ACC as well, where we have an agreement with them. The others, we cannot clearly mention at that stage because you must also understand that battery recycling and how they, those customers, and these are mainly automotive customers, want to set up this in the future. This will be part of their value creation model as well. They want to make sure that they have set all of the right mechanisms to be able to harvest the batteries. We had a discussion in the break to get back those batteries in reality. Because what you want to do as an OEM at the end of the day, once you have purchased or produced a battery, you will never want to let go of that. You will always want to keep the metals inside in your own closed loop because they are so scarce. That's why all of the OEMs, you know, are a little bit shy to communicate about it because they need to have first a convincing mechanism to make that happen. You can be sure within this 15, there are the same names that we talk about in Ralph's case on our cathode manufacturing. I can confirm that this is a key request of many to, let's say, to combine that. There is even some customers that make a very concrete request that say, "We want to, i f we would give you a business on cathode material, our requirement is already today 50% of recycled content." You know, that's one example. Some of you might recognize that announcement from an OEM but we expect this to be even more prominent in the next, you know, time to continue. There's a question over there. I have a quick one on sourcing the scrap or the end-of-life batteries. How does that process work? Is it, do you pay the OEMs sort of a fee to get the batteries or do they pay you something? How is that dynamic work? Thanks for the question. There are, at this moment in time, really different schemes on how we source material. I mentioned to you have battery scrap, and then of course, there's a direct sourcing with the cell maker. You have end-of-life materials that really come from the OEM or authorized treatment facilities. I mean, you have dismantling car shredder companies right now that have received in the meantime, already electric cars, and they want to, of course, they want the battery to be recycled. On the commercial terms, yeah, obviously, there is, we heard already earlier today how recycling business work. Part is fixed fee, part is linked to the value recovery you can create for the customer. It's a very similar model that has been explained on precious metal recycling, where you have a recycling fee and you have a yield component of your revenue. Now what we expect is that the market is developing because of the OEM closed loop aspect. It's not, you know, the bulk of the market will not be the same like in precious metal recycling, where there is kind of an open market feed of batteries to be recycled and you can do it or not Ecosystems will form around those OEMs, where those batteries always will circulate, and the business model is including the treatment of it but not the, for us as a recycler, not buying or selling these materials or these batteries in this case. We are working basically. We're treating it for a customer, and we are reimbursed by the two revenue streams that we have explained. Hey, I just have questions on both recycling as well as fuel cell side. On recycling, I was just wondering on lithium, at what lithium price is recycling viable? Say, at current price, lithium price is very good. Are you recycling LCOs as well? And at what lithium price does it become no longer economically viable? I understand y ou probably recycle it anyway just because of requirement. A bit more technical, do you recycle lithium to lithium metal or lithium hydroxide or carbonate? When you talk about 150 KT, is it 150 KT of, say, C material or is it individual metals? On fuel cell, my questions are you selling just fuel cell catalysts or CCMs and you've just catalyst them, why is that the decision? In terms of you talk about PGM capability being, you know, very important for your, for your fuel cell presence, I was wondering if you can expand a bit more on your presence in, sort of minor metals like iridium, ruthenium. What sort of market share you have currently in those and, from your current PGM clients. Yeah. First of all, thank you. It's the question shows it's not the first time that you talk about battery recycling, that's for sure and Kurt will be able to give you all the answers. Maybe we start on the fuel cell side. Yes. You were talking about, for instance, iridium, et cetera, and I think there we would have the same focus indeed on trying to lower the iridium content. It's also a supply chain focus, I would say, because we all know that iridium is a relatively scarce metal. The iridium is used as, let's say, kind of, yeah, a catalyst on the anode side of the system to avoid that if water goes through the membrane, that you get corrosion, right? You can deal with that with ruthenium. And at the same time, you can also do it with balance of plant. It's a combination of optimizing the plant design, so the systems design of the stack, as well as lowering the iridium content. There, again, you have to work closely with your customer. If you talk about why and what is our position in the value chain, we are determined that our position should be on the PEM fuel cell catalyst only. Why is that? Because that's what our customers want. They want our expertise in this domain. They don't want us to design CCMs. They don't want us to make MEAs. They want to do them themselves. We will provide the right product so they can optimally use their design and therefore have the best performing stack. The questions on the battery recycling, let me start on the input material. The 150,000-ton that we mentioned or that we indicate is actually a market conform mix that we foresee of packs, modules, and black mass. Because the throughput of these products is of course different, you can imagine the value density of black mass is higher than of a pack. The output of lithium, it's foreseen as a lithium salt. A lithium salt that we then, in a closed loop agreement, we can convert into the lithium chemical that we will need in our plants. We will not go to lithium metal. We will also create a closed loop for the lithium chemical. Thirdly, on the, let's say, what is the price level of lithium has to be to be economically viable, I would like to really tackle that question differently. Because in the end, you're not doing recycling for, like, one element or one element's price of one element makes the equation positive or not. It doesn't work like that. You get a certain scrap amount to be recycled at a certain condition, and you create value as a sum of the metals. That is, of course, determining what is economically viable or not. This is the equation that you have to look at. Without any doubt, the market value of the metals plays an important role in that. Yeah. Thank you for reminding on that part of the question. I mentioned that we will indeed focus on a flexible input. Our key focus is indeed NMC or LCO, I mean, layered oxides. Allow me as a chemist but really layered oxides, this is what we like, and this is what we're also going to recycle. Let's not forget, there is a recycling obligation from collection schemes. I think, I mean, people living in European region probably know well that we all collect batteries. There are countrywide collection schemes, and these batteries also end up at our plant and we recycle them. Next question. Just to follow up on that, I mean, I guess, that raises a question of, obviously, all of those metals you've flagged are a lot higher than they were in 2020. I guess if you think about 2019, if you think about the metal prices today versus then, what's the kind of profitability that you're expecting? Are they profitable processes in both kind of conditions? Is it a case of when you get to 150 KT of scale, then you would expect them to be profitable? I guess what the levers are to actually achieving that, is it simply just the fact that you've got an economy of scale of having a larger footprint? Secondly, I guess the indication on Filip's presentation earlier was that these two would be material contributors to recycling c atalysis EBITDA, like 30% of the division by 2030. I guess what I didn't really get a sense of was kind of the steps towards that and kind of how you expect them to scale. If you just kind of give any more of a sense for both the fuel cells business. Yep. Okay. I think, Charles, the theme of the day is very clearly that we are looking at profitable growth. For battery recycling, it's not any different. I mean, I'm not here to chase 150,000 tons of materials to fill my furnace. I'm here to serve all the stakeholders of the company, right? This is for us crucial. Is it in the end 20,000 tons less because it doesn't generate the necessary margins or the targets that we have, then it's going to be 20,000 tons less. On the scaling, I will take the first part on the battery recycling. I mentioned we're going to use our existing plant. We will debottleneck. We are currently doing some upgrading, and in second half, we kind of refire and reach a higher scale that we have had in the past. Of course, I mean, 2026 is currently the year where we will have the SOP for the next plant. Second half of the decade, of course, that should be contributing to the recycling segment. I want to bring in another aspect on your question, profitability. What happens if, this is how I understood your question, what happens if the equation on the metal prices are changing and we put in place a 150,000-ton plant, is something changing in our value perception? The big difference that you saw on the side of Kurt is that recycling will be mandatory, will be regulated. It has to be there. Then there are some other levers outside of the metals, which for example, is the CO2 efficiency that will drive the price. When you look to that period, nobody knows how these metals will develop. If you are in an overall scarcity situation and you have a situation where that we think is pretty likely, there is a difference in price for metals. The recycled metals, and we said it before also in Denis presentation, the recycled metals we think in the future will have a premium versus the virgin metals. Even if there would be a price erosion, we would think that this erosion would be less on the recycled metal, which is another buffer in the value equation. Do allow me to chip in on that one because I did spend a lot of time in the battery raw materials before I was heading the Catalysis catalyst business group. If you, for instance, nickel will be one of the big elements out there, and we all know that, let's say the cheap sources of nickel, they're practically gone, right? I mean, if you would look at the C1 cost curve of new projects, it's definitely at a much higher level, for instance, than the nickel prices we would have seen maybe three or four years ago when the market had huge overhang also reflected on the stocks on the LME. I think there will be a substantial floor on the nickel price that at least will allow for this element. Now, you were also asking a question on fuel cell catalyst. Yes, our plant will be up and running as of 2024, right? I said also that normally this capacity should be able to carry us towards the end of the decade. Indeed, we'll be filling up that capacity. Of course, at the end of the decade, that will be more outspoken than really in 2025, 2026, when we are ramping it up. It's more to the outer side. You also saw it on the growth curve, of course, of the market. If the market speeds up because some people say that maybe we are a bit conservative, then we'll happily accommodate these volumes, obviously. We have a few questions also from the audience online on battery recycling as well. Tesla and other cell producers are looking at battery recycling as well. Is there any chance that this process will be internalized? Well, we see already right now that different companies focus on different strategies. I mean, we really made an in-depth market analysis on what is captive and what is non-captive, and we strongly feel that there is a need for the capacity that we put in place. First of all, in Europe but we see the same thing happening in North America. At this moment in time, we are pretty comfortable and pretty convinced that that capacity will be absolutely needed. Let me add to that as well. It would be counterintuitive for the strategies of the OEMs that are the final customers of battery materials and recycling at the end of the day, if they would, while being more present in the value chain of battery materials, they would leave the recycling to the cell makers, for example, while they would like to be more invested into the battery itself. Having said that, the likelihood that a car manufacturer, and I would maybe exclude Tesla here because they are doing a lot of interesting things but normal car manufacturers as we know them, they have decided not to produce cathode material themselves because it is too far away from what they know as a value chain. They go only as far as battery cell manufacturing, which is much more mechanical than chemical. The same is valid also for battery recycling. There our value proposition is similar to in cathode materials, that we are the preferred partner. We want to be the preferred partner of the OEMs to be the recycler in their ecosystem, which is a solution to the problem of captive market. Maybe a little bit related to that but not captive capacity but other competitors. Aren't we too late to the market with battery recycling at scale? Because we have seen multiple companies, including Li-Cycle, Redwood Materials, Battery Resourcers, BASF, announcing significant CapEx and expansions, including customer contracts. Thank you for the question. I'm afraid I'm going to repeat myself. I mean, how can you be too late in this market if you have been the first and biggest so far? We have an accumulated experience, industrial experience in battery recycling that far outreaches all the players we see currently in the market. That's one thing. Secondly, a lot of the announcements are actually, in my opinion, not end-to-end recycling announcements. So it's really important to be critical on what is being published, in these ambitions. Somebody announcing pretreatment all the way to black mass, frankly speaking, this is not recycling. This is a pretreatment step but then the hard work still has to start from black mass onwards. In that case, I mean, having said that, of course, it's clearly an attractive market, so you will see more and more people looking into that. This kind of also confirms our conviction. I'm confident where we are, what we've done, the experience that we used, that we have now something to offer to the market, which is absolutely industry. I would like to add to that because I think we have to be a little bit. Also, the blame is on our side because, as I fully agree that we have all of the steps that Kurt just said, how can the market know this if we don't talk about it, right? I mean, that's a little bit self-criticism here, and today is the moment. We talk about it, we share the plans. It's not a plan that we have developed, that we say we will do something. We just tell you where we are in this process, which we have started many, many years ago, and now the ambition is going forward. I think there is a truth in saying that we have not clearly waved our flag in battery recycling but with today, we're doing that. Perhaps one final question on fuel cells, Bart. You have a 40% market share in automotive applications now, which is very high. Is it the purpose or your ambition to keep that percentage? I have to look at our legal counsel. No, no. I mean, as said, we want to keep on banking on our leading position and continue to develop new technologies. The market will be efficient. We're not going to be the only one. I'm really not allowed to talk about this, I guess. We're not going to be the only one but at the same time, I think we will be one of the big players. That's our ambition and that's also where you're going to see us. Yeah. Again, here the growth dynamics are in play in a very strongly growing market. There is room to give away some of the market share, and you still will be a very important player and benefit from the strongly growing market. I think that's the conclusion that we have made. Absolutely. Our qualifications that you have seen on the funnel also show that we actually have a great basis to be ambitious. I believe there are no further questions, also not here from the audience. That concludes then the Q&A session. Then, Mathias, we hand over one final time to you for your closing remarks. Thank you, Evelien. Yeah, a big thanks to all of you in the room but I have to say maybe even a bigger thanks to everybody online who has really followed through. As we said in the beginning, it's not easy to have the discipline to do that but we would like to thank you for your attention today. We have shared with you our strategy, our ambition towards 2030. We think it is a bold ambition. It is ambition that will change Umicore but at the same time, we think it is a realistic ambition because we have based it on a platform that has proven to anticipate megatrends and to work into the future. Megatrends is the keyword in our strategy. We do not have to think about where to play. Our strong foundations are in the right place, and we have to define the how. How are we going to do that? How are we scaling up in that market? How are we doing that by always being value creative. The portfolio is something we have talked about a lot today. The diverse portfolio that has a lot of synergies and has a lot of things in common that make it stronger than just the different business units and make it stronger also from a value creation model where we have tried to explain to you that by the different modes we are running our business growth, cash flow, ROCE, all of that together, we have the right system to propel our company into the future. Growth is important but we have stressed several times, it is a conditional growth. We will be growing whenever we can be value creative, when the contracts that we're doing with our customers meet those requirements, and when the investments that we are doing are contributing to returns significantly above cost of capital. We have shared with you today our ambition in CapEx. I think, we have surprised some of you with those ambitions. For us, the equation is clear. When we see a fast-growing market, when we see ourselves with a value proposition to capture significant parts of that market at favorable terms, we need to invest. It doesn't work without it. We think that this investment is a very good investment into the future, and based on the RISE strategy, the pillars that we have explained to you, the core one being the reliable transformation partner to solve the problems of our customers with the unique value proposition of Umicore. This really makes us think that our proposition to grow like a startup company with more than doubling our revenues to 2030, at the same time being constantly value creative like an established company, is a good offer. I hope also that you have seen that my colleagues from the management board, that we all, we radiated confidence. We have the conviction that this plan is working, that it's a plan that is based on our ambition to be the circular material technology company. Thank you very much for your attention. Now, of course, we have to have, you know, a separation between us online and the ones here. We invite everybody who is here in London now to continue our discussion with something to eat, a drink and then I say goodbye to everybody online. Thank you very much and have a great evening.