Welcome to the Umicore Half-Year 2025 Results Conference call. My name is Ellen, and I'll be your coordinator for today's event. Please note this call is being recorded, and for the duration, your lines will be on listen only. However, you will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end. This can be done by pressing star one on your telephone keypad. If you require assistance at any time, please press star zero, and you'll be connected to an operator. I will now hand you over to your host, Bart Sap, CEO, to begin today's conference. Thank you. Hello, a very good morning everyone, and welcome to the H1 2025 Results for Umicore. I do realize that for many of you, it's a very busy season and very busy week, so I highly appreciate you being here in the call. As usual, we have an interesting agenda for you. On the first point, I want to take us back to the core strategy in a first snapshot, so a small reminder of our CMD. Then we'll have a look at our key figures and highlights. I'll cover the business review. Wannes will then go to the financial review. I'll be back with the Outlook 2025. We'll wrap it up, and then we'll open the floor for Q&A. Let's have a look at our core strategy, which we launched in March 2025. Now, as you might remember, we are building on our core, which is our business model, right? Our business model is more relevant than ever. We are building on our business model with four key pillars, key focus domains, with the first one being capital. Then we have performance, people and culture, and partnerships. On the capital, it's all about a more midterm balanced capital allocation. What does that mean? We continue to invest in battery materials, but at a lower pace. We also allocate a significant portion of our future CapEx to our recycling business in Hoboken to further unlock the flow sheet. It means for the midterm plan that we have been reducing our CapEx by EUR 1.4 billion over that 2025 to 2028 period, and this versus the previous plan. On performance, as you also see in our numbers, we really focus on increasing our operational efficiency and our overall performance and value extraction across all our activities. The goal for this year is EUR 100 million EBITDA, and we are well on track in H1 to already be halfway with EUR 50 million in the pocket. If we look at people and culture, it's all about installing this performance and value-oriented culture and building on the successful cultural shift we had in Automotive Catalysts. This we now want to bring to the entire group to further unlock that potential that we have with this beautiful company. Partnerships, we continue to actively explore partnerships, especially in the field of our Battery Materials Solutions activities, while at the same time we continue to focus also on our solid midterm plan for our Battery Catalogue Materials business. Now, I also would like to highlight, and it's important also for the analyst community out there and anybody who is following Umicore closely, we did update our reporting structure with our new strategy. It means that we have expanded the battery materials business group with the battery recycling business that we have put in there. We now have the business group Battery Materials Solutions, and this actually encompasses all battery-related activities. It means that also from a reporting point of view, we are now restating our numbers for 2024, and we are actually reporting in H1 2025 for the first time in this new reporting structure. It means that the recycling activities, battery recycling activities, which used to be reported under the Recycling Business Group, have now been moved to Battery Materials Solutions. It's important to shift those numbers in order to have a good comparison. Let me now have a look at the key figures and highlights. I would say that we really have an encouraging performance in H1 2025. We have seen a sustained amount and also very good operational efficiency. We're happy with this set of numbers. If we look at our revenues, we came out at EUR 1.8 billion. Our EBITDA for H1, EUR 433 million, well up versus last year. A return on capital of 16.4%. Our leverage remains below 2.5 and at the level of 2.3, and a very solid EBITDA margin of 24.3%. We are slightly free cash flow negative for the first half. If I look at some of the business groups out there, you will see that consistently throughout the business groups, we have good returns on capital. Catalysis 43.7%, Recycling 154%, and also in Specialty Materials on the back of a stronger cobalt momentum, we now have a return on capital above 12.5% or at 12.5%, which is in line with our 2028 target. We also recently upgraded our guidance for 2025, and we have upped it in that EUR 790 million-EUR 840 million range. We did that at the start of July. If I look at the highlights of H1, I would like to highlight two pillars here, basically capital deployment and capital rigor. Our capital expenditures have come in in H1 2025 at EUR 109 million, which is well below the level of H1 2024. We foresee for 2025 CapEx projections to be reduced to EUR 350 million. I remind you, last year we were at EUR 550 million. We were aiming roughly to be 20% lower. S till here, we take another step down in the expected CapEx, reflecting our strict approach in capital allocation, but also in timing our CapEx at the right moment. If we look at performance, we did more than EUR 50 million in the first half in efficiency savings, which is a great objective. As mentioned before, we're aiming for at least EUR 100 million for the year. If I now go to the next business review, let me start off with the Battery Materials Solutions. Battery Materials Solutions for the first half of the year, we see that revenues are somewhat lower. We have an adjusted EBITDA roughly in line with H1 2024. For Battery Cathode Materials, which is the first leg within that Battery Materials Solutions business group, we have revenues of about EUR 208 million, which is below H1 2024. We have slightly lower refining volumes and also slightly lower CAM volumes as we anticipated. Our legacy contracts are fading out and new contracts are ramping up. The main customers for the ramp-up in 2025 are SK On, ACC, and IonWay. SK On, we talk about this contract, it's quite relevant in 2025 from a volume point of view. This is also an interesting customer that we have, showing the diversification of our customer portfolio and our technology position. If I look at the adjusted EBITDA for the first half of 2025, it stands at minus EUR 15 million, while for the full year in the outlook, and I'm mentioning here the outlook for battery material Cathode Materials specifically, we are still confident in being around break even for the full year. That would mean that the run rate in the second half of the year would be EUR 15 million positive. On an annualized basis, EUR 30 million positive EBITDA run rate for the business. For battery recycling solutions, we see lower spending in H1 2024, and the majority of our spending is really on further optimizing and preparing ourselves on that flow sheet and technical capabilities of this really unique pyrometallurgical process that we have. On the technology front, we also have a small yet significant update for you. Now you have seen that BMW and Solid Power have brought an all-solid-state battery vehicle to the market. We can share with you that actually this is Umicore Cathode Material inside. It means, and it reconfirms, and that's also what we see across the board, that our solid-state battery technology is really well received. We're very proud that also we now have this real test car on the road together with BMW and Solid Power. Let me now transit to Catalysis. If we look to the overall IC passenger car production for the year, we see a slight decline of H1 2024 versus H1 2025. We go down from 38.3 - 37.5. This means a contraction of the market of 1.7%. It's a different picture throughout the world, like China, slight growth. North America, minus 6%. Europe, minus 9%. South America, 8.7%. We had a slow underperformance in the Chinese market, so a marginal underperformance there. We did strongly outperform the market in North America, in Europe, and especially South America. In South America, it has to do with the introduction of PL8, where we acquired a broader customer base. There's a step-up in legislation, so it's an additional brick and also actually a higher PGM loading. We're pretty happy with that. In the HDD, we see that the market was a bit softer in Europe, while in China, the market recovered. Looking at the underlying numbers, once more, a strong performance with good volume and also a really great quality of earnings. If you look at Automotive Catalysts, revenues in line with H1 2024 and earnings as well. That means we continue to offset, let's say, and improve our quality of earnings, and we continue to offset the historical PGM price decline we have seen. If I would take you back to 2021 at the bottom right of the slide, we would have had an H1 performance of EUR 240 million at much higher PGM prices versus today, where we are now posting a EUR 222 million EBITDA at significantly lower PGM prices. It's clear that our quality of earnings is improving, and also our average EBITDA margin has been trending up over the last years. If we look at Precious Metal Catalysts, there we have higher revenues in our inorganic chemicals, and this more than offsets a somewhat weaker volume development in our homogeneous catalyst business. Fuel Cell & Stationary Catalysts, also quite interesting evolutions, both in fuel cells and stationary catalysts, our volumes and revenues are up. In the stationary catalyst business, interesting evolution, as you know, is on that backup, these backup generators for data centers. There we also have a very interesting business, and we see quite some volume growth in that segment. If you then look at the construction of our fuel cell catalyst plant in China, it is well on track, really also from a capital point, well managed, and still to be expected commissioning in early 2026, as communicated earlier. Let's have a look at Recycling. Recycling, of course, when we talk about Recycling, we have to talk about metal prices, and we have seen that rhodium, gold, platinum, silver, right? These levels, the price levels that we have seen in euros, right? Because the dollar significantly depreciated versus the euro lately. In euro, we see stronger prices than before. A reminder is that we are well hedged for our PGM exposure in H1, but also in H2, and that we were complemented by a supportive minor and specialty metal price environment to which exposure is not hedged. Wannes will come back to you later on this PGM hedge evolution. Now, let's go to the second slide for this section. A deep dive more in the numbers. Also here, I dare to say that it's a really solid performance with a strong adjusted EBITDA in line with H1 2024. In the precious metals refining activities, our revenues were close to H1 2024. We have seen higher volumes, yet slightly less favorable supply conditions. What do I mean by this? We see the SAC market still moving more in the same range as we have seen it before. The spent industrial catalyst, there's a weaker chemical segment out there, so there's some softness there. Also, with the floodings in South Africa, some complex refinery feed was lower than before as anticipated, but we see that recovering better in the second half of the year. As the earnings are somewhat lower than H1 2024 for precious metals refining, this is really reflecting the decreasing average hedge price level. Of course, we have had some inflation, which is always there, yet we were able to partially offset this inflation increase by operational efficiencies. In the jewelry and industrial metals, we have higher revenues against H1 2024. We see good volumes, strong contribution from the refining and recycling activities, but also really a strong product amount for our products for the luxury and markets. Precious Metals Management, we have seen PGM volatility and precious metals volatility in general. Of course, volatility means a beneficial and favorable trading environment, and there also the momentum was strong. Here again, EBITDA margin still well above 41%. Also here, pretty happy with our performance. Now, as you know, for Umicore, we do add a lot of value to sustainability, meaning that we continue to invest in sustainability improvements of our facilities and the surroundings. What does this mean? It means that we were able to continue the building of that perimeter and the green zone. It's almost finalized now. Yet on top, we continue to invest an annual EUR 25 million to further improve our environmental performance because we continue to raise the bar and are committed to remaining the world's most efficient and environmentally friendly refiner. For us, business and this statement go hand in hand, and that protects the long-term potential of this activity. Let me now transit to Specialty Materials. Specialty Materials had a strong H1 for this business, EBITDA up 35%, higher margins in the cobalt product segment. Also here again, operational efficiency improvements. You see Operational Efficiency focusing on that value and capital discipline. It runs throughout the organization. That's why we almost have to come back to it because you really see that reflection in our numbers. Now, in Cobalt & Specialty Materials, revenues were whatsoever lower. At the same time, higher margins for the cobalt products, as mentioned, but also here again, those efficiency measures. In Metal Deposition Solutions, it was all about a solid demand for a decorative application, a solid demand in semiconductor, somewhat offsetting lower revenues in the electronics segments. In the Electro-Optic Materials business units, we had good demand for our High Purity Germanium Crystals, and we continue to see a strong demand for our germanium refining and recycling services. You know that also there the geopolitics play and having that in-house recycling capability is also really a differentiator for this business. EBITDA margin now again above the 20%. We are at 21, close to 22%. Also here a good step up in performance. We have seen how the world around us is evolving. We see that metals or resources are often used to play out the political game or actually used to actually put some tension between different blocks in the world. It means that also for Umicore, the fact that we are active in so many metals and so many of these core or critical metals is really a differentiator, especially as we also have a footprint not only in China, but especially also in Europe. You clearly see this here on this slide. At Umicore, we are active in 17 out of the 34 critical raw materials. That's on the refining side. At the same time, also for some of these products on the material side. You can understand as that more critical raw material independence or more balanced dependency becomes more important, you can see that this is a very interesting future undercurrent for our organization. With that, Wannes, maybe you can have a look at the financials a bit from a closer eye. Yes, thank you, Bart. Good morning, everyone. As Bart mentioned, over the past six months, we continued our disciplined approach to cost and capital allocation. Our results were boosted by group-wide operational efficiencies, together with solid activity levels in Catalysis, Recycling, and Specialty Materials. The group EBITDA margin increased from 22%- 24%. Adjusted EBITDA was up 10% or EUR 40 million and amounted to EUR 433 million for the first half of the year. The efficiency measures supported the earnings with more than EUR 50 million from initiatives across the foundation businesses, Battery Materials Solutions, as well as the corporate segment. I will come back with insights on the key drivers later in this presentation. The increased activity levels, as Bart mentioned, in Catalysis, in Recycling, and in Specialty Materials resulted in an EBITDA uplift of almost EUR 40 million. These uplifts allowed us to compensate for the EUR 53 million headwind from inflation and foreign exchange, with the forex impact being largely linked to the translational effect for non-euro subsidiaries. In the first half, the reduction of favorable price levels for precious metal hedges was almost fully compensated by improved prices for non-hedged precious minor and specialty metals. Let me provide you more insight into our efficiency program. Savings are well on track with a year-to-date contribution of EUR 55 million versus a full year target of €100 million. Now, looking at the breakdown of the savings, 25% of the uplift in EBITDA came from top-line growth, 15% from reduced cost of goods sold, 40% from SG&A, and around 20% from savings in R&D. The restructuring of group corporate functions, as well as the streamlining of corporate R&D, which we announced end of last year, was implemented ahead of plan this year. In Catalysis, the R&D footprint was further optimized with the consolidation of the research center for heavy-duty diesel in Germany, and in Battery Materials, SG&A was structurally reduced. Now, turning to the consolidated P&L, the net results group share was EUR 137 million. The depreciations and amortizations decreased to EUR 131 million following the impairment in Battery Materials in June last year. Adjusted EBITDA was EURE302 million, up EUR 61 million. Adjusted net finance costs increased to EUR 102 million due to a higher average net debt, lower interest income on cash deposits as the interest rates came down, together with a negative impact from forex. The average cost of gross debt amounted to 3.2% and was stable versus previous year, thanks to long maturities and over 80% of debt being fixed rate. The adjusted tax charge amounted to EUR 64 million, stable versus last year. The pre-tax income was up, but the adjusted effective tax rate decreased from 36% - 32% this year. This resulted in an adjusted net profit group share of EUR 135 million. The adjusted earnings per share were up 16% to EUR 0.56. Moving to the consolidated balance sheet, the liquidity of the group remains strong with the cash position of EUR 1.1 billion. Gross financial debt decreased from EUR 3.4 billion-EUR 2.9 billion after the repayment of the EUR 500 million convertible bond in June. The equity for the group amounted to EUR 2.02 billion. Net financial debt was EUR 1.9 billion, and the net gearing ratio landed at 47.6%. Now, let me provide more insights on our net financial debt position based on the net cash flow bridge. Cash flow from operations amounted to EUR 260 million. Net working capital increased with EUR 197 million, reflecting the higher activity levels in Catalysis, Recycling, and Specialty Materials. CapEx, including capitalized development expenses, decreased to EUR 117 million. We apply a maximum control on the phasing of CapEx, and spending will be more weighted in the second half of the year. CapEx, excluding capitalized development expenses for 2025, is now anticipated to be around EUR 350 million versus the initially foreseen, let's say, EUR 440 million. This results in a free cash flow from operations of minus EUR 54 million. Taking into account a contribution of EUR 250 million of equity into IonWay in January and cash out related to taxes, financing, dividends, and other items of EUR 99 million, this resulted in a net financial debt increase of EUR 404 million and a net debt of EUR 1.8 billion for the group. This is in line with what we anticipated for, and as a result, the leverage ratio increased to 2.28 times last 12 months adjusted EBITDA. I want to repeat that, as mentioned during our Capital Markets Day, leverage will peak during 2025 and 2026. We anticipate leverage to turn below 2 times from 2027 onwards following the strong cash flow generation in the group and with the finalization of the investments in Battery Materials. Now, moving to the next slide, I would like to remind you that for 2025 to 2028, a substantial portion of the future strategic metal exposure has been locked in through forward contracts. With this strategic hedging policy, we aim to protect future earnings from price volatility while ensuring we also do not overhedge our anticipated exposure. Over the past six months, our hedged position remained largely stable. We have increased forward metal hedges for silver in 2029, and we are in the midst of executing additional mandates for 2029 for rhodium. As a conclusion, we are putting a strong focus on those things that we can control: cost, cash, and capital. EBITDA improved and is up EUR 40 million, driven by a solid underlying performance and supported by over EUR 50 million in efficiency measures. Capital expenditures were reduced to EUR 109 million, and we expect full-year capex to be around EUR 350 million. We continue to keep tight control over net debt and leverage, and we expect to keep the leverage below the 2.5 times adjusted EBITDA. Here, I would like to hand it back to Bart for the outlook. Yes, thank you, Wannes. Very clear. Now, let's have a look at the outlook, and the outlook we communicated already early June, of course. It's anticipated that we indeed will be in that EUR 790 million- EUR 850 million EBITDA range. There's no change there today versus what we announced earlier. Just wrapping it up before we go to Q&A. I really dare to say that H1 was really, we really had encouraging results and a solid performance. It was driven by sustained demand and also really strong operational efficiency, and there was also somewhat a supportive metal price environment. It's three elements: operational efficiency, sustained demand, and a supportive metal price environment. If you look at H1, there was a strong performance in our foundation business, while we start to see indeed that gradual ramp-up in our Battery Catalogue materials contracts. With that, I think once more an encouraging H1, a good guidance for the second half of the year, or at least a full year, right? With this, I would like to open the floor for Q&A. Thank you. If you'd like to ask a question or make a contribution on today's call, please press star one on your telephone keypad. To withdraw your question, please press star two. You will be advised when to ask your question. We will take our first question from Ranulf Orr at Citigroup. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, all. Thanks for taking the question. Just one from me, please. I think you mentioned that the metal price impact, including hedges at the group level, was just minus 1 million. I was wondering, could you please break this down or give some more color by division just to help us better understand the underlying earnings developments? That would be great. Thank you. Yeah. Good morning, Ranulf. Looking at the metal price effect, you're right. I mean, year over year, the uplift is minimal. As you know, and as we also highlighted, we have the precious metal hedges, and those are favorable versus today's rates. At the same time, the contribution is rolling off this year and will continue to roll off, also going into next year. If you look at the first half, this is where the roll-off resulted in a year-over-year lower contribution, and I would say low double-digit type of a contribution from those favorable hedges year over year. That has been offset by a more favorable environment looking at the precious metals, gold, thinking of businesses like jewelry and industrial metals, but also looking at minor and special metals. This is where it lands in the Recycling segment. Primarily in the Recycling segment is where we see those movements. Okay, so there's no metal price impact coming through in Specialty Materials in the Cobalt & Specialty Materials part of the business. Yeah, looking at the Specialty Materials business, indeed, here we see a solid price level for germanium. For cobalt, we also have seen a hiccup in the price, and this has resulted in somewhat stronger margins, I would say, in those segments. That's correct. Okay, great. Thank you. We will take our next question from Tia Badora, BNP Paribas. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, all. Good morning. Two questions from me, if I may. The first one is on the catalyst division. I'm conscious you've had a pretty strong first H1 with record profitability reached. I was wondering if this is all underlying or if there was a specific one-off somewhere, maybe a new contract that has kicked in. As a follow-up, how should we think about profitability levels going into H2 and beyond? My second question would then be on the efficiency measures. Can you maybe give us more color on the short-term levers you're taking actions on? Thank you. Maybe let me take the first question first, and maybe Wannes will start with the second one, and I might chip in if I would like to add some more color. On the first one, indeed, we had a very strong H1, and I would also like to remind all of you that we took a bit more of a cautious approach in H1 versus the overall market forecast initially. Yet the amount remained solid, so that was also good news for us. If you talk about customer wind, I would mainly refer to South America, where PL8 or the L8, if we really focus on that light duty segment, has kicked in. There we see volume growth with indeed a better customer positioning, an additional brick, and higher PGMs. I would say that if you look at the market in South Africa growing roughly 9%, our growth was well north of 30% in that segment. Yes, there was some element, but it was mainly across the board the strong underlying performance of the market from a demand point of view. If you look at H2, there we see the classical seasonality, and there we also have taken again a realistic approach to what demand could be for that second half, and we see that for the time being trending in line with our expectations. Wannes, if you could comment on the efficiencies? Yeah, so looking at the levers for efficiencies, the one that we pulled over the last in the first half basically were those linked to the restructuring and to the consolidation of footprint. Looking at SG&A and R&D, those have been implemented. The levers that we continue to pull are looking at top line, looking at pricing, also looking at operational efficiencies. Looking at the plant, looking at the operations, improving yields, reducing waste basically, improving quality. Those are elements that we continue to drive. If you look at the full year, normally if all runs according to plan, you will see that the proportion of contribution from top line and cost of goods sold will increase versus the overheads, I would say. Yeah, maybe adding an additional metric just to give some flavor and some substance is that, as you know, we announced, let's say, restructuring in November last year, where we had indeed, let's say, 200 plus people directly impacted. That was, of course, a very painful situation. At the same time, we are still very diligent in our workforce development. Year over year, I think we're now 6% down. On top, we had a significant reduction in contingent workforce, which also, I would say, estimating here a bit, between 1% and 2% of a workforce equivalent. Yes, we have been very disciplined, and we will continue to do so. Of course, with the ramp-up of Battery Materials, as volumes start to grow, you will see, of course, more hands coming in to deliver those volumes. Great, thank you both. Thank you. We will take our next question from Chetan Udeshi. JPMorgan, your line is open. Please go ahead. Yeah, hi, thanks. Morning all. First question I had was I was just looking at the presentation slide on catalyst business, and I mean, you are saying revenue and earnings in Catalysis, Automotive Catalysts is flat. It seems all of the growth is coming from the other two smaller divisions, and especially Precious Metal Catalysts. Can you remind us what's going on in that business and how much sticky that growth in Precious Metal Catalysts business might be? The second question was just looking at the guidance. You are talking about moderation in Recycling earnings, if I understood that correctly, in H2 versus H1. Is that based on an assumed price decline for some of the unhedged metals from current levels, or is this assuming that you have another leg down from hedging activity, sort of reducing your effective prices for the metals that you hedge? The last question is, you know, you talked about the strategic importance of Umicore's Recycling business in the context of geopolitics. I'm just curious, you know, you do use rare earths in your Automotive Catalysts. I think you know they are part of the washcoats. Do you have any trouble sourcing some of these materials now in the context of geopolitical environment, or are you well diversified from that point of view? Thank you. Yeah, Wannes will take one and two, and I'll take three on the rare earth question. Yeah, sure. Good morning, Chetan. Looking at Catalysis, your conclusion is right. Looking at Automotive Catalysts, this is where the underlying market has been shrinking year over year, where we have been able to keep our revenues and volumes flat, slight increase to flat. The growth is indeed coming from Fuel Cell & Stationary Catalysts and Precious Metal Catalysts. If you look at fuel cells, this is where the sales, particularly in Korea for fuel cells, have picked up in the first half. If you look at Stationary Catalysts, this is, as Bart mentioned, catalysts that are used in also power solutions, power grid solutions, and that also resulted in an increase. Then Precious Metal Catalysts, also there in some of those end markets, we had a solid activity. We had increase in volumes. Now, looking at Recycling and the profile of Recycling, looking at H2, this is where we will have a continued roll-off of those favorable hedges, and that also comes into play, as we can call it, a type of a seasonality if you look at the profile of H2. Maybe for rare earths, Bart? Absolutely. Indeed, that's right, Chetan. Indeed, there's rare earth in our washcoat solution, more rare earth oxide solutions that we, of course, introduce there. Indeed, China has put up some restrictions on export on some of these elements. At the same time, I would like to highlight that the catalytic applications are not under that ban. This being said, we have seen, of course, that the queues and customs have been longer. We're not only sourcing from China. We have a diverse supply chain. So far, we have not had any issue, let's say, in getting material through our active management on stocks and our diversified supply chain. On top, if customers would desire, we even have solutions not including some of these rare earths from China. So far, things look to be okay. You don't source the rare earths yourself, right? You're buying the oxide from Solvay or some of the other suppliers. I guess you're less directly involved from that point of view, I suppose. We do source, indeed, rare earth oxides. That's right. Okay, got you. Thank you. We will take our next question from Sebastian Bray, Berenberg. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Good morning, and thank you for taking my question. First, two, please. The first is on the balance of price downs or pricing changes in hedges for Recycling and current metal spot prices. If I were to take the Umicore book for 2026, which is largely hedged, and current metal spot prices, would the group-wide impact on EBITDA be neutral or negative if things continue as they are? My second question is on the ACC contract with Stellantis. There was some chatter last year about Stellantis stepping away from NMC as a technology and increasing the role of LFP in its portfolio. Do you have any indications if the customer is going to drop to the minimum ends of volumes under these contracts? Thank you. Okay. Wannes, you go for the first? Yeah. Good morning, Sebastian. Looking at the evolution of the prices for the hedged metals, going into 2026, this is basically where indeed that supportive or that support rolls off and where we would say that the effect versus today's metal prices is more neutral. On the ACC Stellantis question, indeed, I think Stellantis made some statements on LFP. Initially, ACC was going to build three plants. Ultimately, so far, they only built two blocks of capacity in France, right? These installations are actually progressing well according to the customer. I mean, that's happening. These are pure NMC blocks, but it's true that, let's say, the NMC potential of ACC as a whole for the time being is somewhat lower. Now, as you well know, we have the takeaway provisions in these contracts. At the same time, we continue also to work on customer diversification, as per mentioning in our capital markets day in March. I would say the situation has not changed versus the latest comments we had in March. Therefore, there's no reason for us to change our outlook into 2028 as presented. Thank you. To clarify on the first question, the neutral metals pricing effect is current spot prices plus hedges, or it's just no changes in hedging prices from 2026 compared to 2025? Yeah, if you look at 2026, a significant portion of the exposure is hedged. If you look at those prices, on average, I would say versus today's metal prices, there is a neutral effect. On the one hand, there are some prices that are elevated versus today's prices. On the other hand, there are elements, metals, where the prices are below today's prices. If you think about silver and gold, this is where prices have come up substantially, and this is where the hedge rates are somewhat lower. On the other hand, we have PGMs where the hedge rates are still higher than today's rates. Overall, this is where we see a more neutral effect versus the average price levels, I would say, in 2026. That's helpful. Thank you for taking my questions. Thank you. We will take our next question from Georgina Fraser, Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thanks, Bart, and thanks, Wannes. I've got two questions. The first one is just on your guidance. Given that you now have these hedging policies in place in precious metals as well as take or pay contracts, can you talk about how much visibility that you have on your earnings trajectory in the second half and where you're currently tracking versus the full-year guidance you've given? The second one is on geopolitical risks, and there are so many changes all the time from the U.S. administration that I might have misunderstood something. I was thinking about the case of aluminum at the moment where there are tariffs on the base metal, but not on aluminum scrap, meaning that there's an incentive for scrap to go to the U.S. to be smelted and use that. How does Umicore think about those types of risks? Are you seeing anything in the metals that are important to you? Can you remind us what the competitive landscape looks like? Does the U.S. have capabilities to recycle metals the same way that Umicore does? Thank you. Yeah. Good morning, Georgina. Maybe I can take the first question. Sure. Indeed, we're operating in a volatile environment. At the same time, having some of those, I mean, substantial parts of the exposure locked in, having those take or pay mechanisms, that gives us also solid confidence looking at the range that we have put out as a guidance. Maybe on the geopolitical aspect. Yes, for sure. It's fair to say, Georgina, indeed, it's quite a roller coaster of announcements these days in the markets. Let me also remind that the direct impact of tariffs for Umicore, as we'd see today, is really not material. It could always be an indirect impact in the overall economy evolution, of course, but that's more difficult to estimate. To your specific question and the impact on PMR, I would like to say that, first of all, the U.S. is not a big market for us to where we source raw materials. It's also not a market where actually we see a big inflow of some of the materials that we refine in Europe. As we see the situation today, we don't expect a major competitive change in landscape by the measures taken by the U.S. What China is doing at this moment in time is more relevant, especially for the specialty metals that have this more positive undercurrent, I would say. Okay, thank you very much. Thank you. We will take our next question from Geoff Haire, UBS. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Yeah, hello. I was wondering if I could ask some questions around metal pricing. First of all, in terms of the outlook that you've got for the second half, are you assuming that the benefit that higher metal prices was in the trading business within Recycling will continue into the second half? Secondly, I was wondering on the metal head split of minus $1 million, which Ranulf asked about, could you actually split out what the benefit was from hedges versus movements in spot prices? I think that would be really helpful. I'm just trying to understand that movement. I may completely misunderstand what hedging is about, but given platinum prices have moved up significantly in the last sort of couple of months, when will you start to see that benefit of that spot price come through into your P&L through the hedging? By the looks of things, looking at the charts that you provided, it could be another two years before you see that price coming into your business. Is that right or am I completely wrong? Okay. Good morning, Geoff. Just thinking of the different questions and where to start. Looking at the outlook, this is where indeed we expect some volatility in the market and hence also in metal trading. This is also what we anticipate in the guidance that we give. If you look at the year-over-year comparison where we want to highlight what are now the key drivers of the uplift in EBITDA, this is where we illustrate that the metal price environment by itself has not necessarily resulted in an uplift year over year. If you decompose it and you look at, on the one hand, we have exposure that has been hedged in the past where the metal price levels had been fixed, this is where year over year, the average level of metal price under the exposure comes down. There's less support on those hedges from a price level. On the other hand, we have exposure that has not been hedged, which we call open exposure. This is where you benefit from the spot price movements. This offsets basically what we lose because of those average hedged price levels being lower year over year. This is where we see that offsetting effect. On top of that, also looking at some of the special and minor metals, also here we see a price uplift in the overall environment. Also here we benefit. That's an element that offsets that roll-off of those favorable hedges. Coming back to your question where you say PGM prices are again getting an uplift, when will we see that effect? That effect is, as I explained earlier, already today to the open exposure and where we sell that exposure at spot prices. Also to an extent, if we continue to hedge forward to future strategic exposure, that's where we can also start benefiting. Again, between 2025 and 2028, we already decently hedged, so we're not necessarily increasing much. For 2029, for instance, this is where we see opportunities to lock in that exposure at today's price levels. I hope that is helpful, Geoff. Thank you. We will take our next question from Tristan Lamotte, Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, thanks for taking my questions. The first is maybe coming back to precious metals. There's a good bridge you provided in the slides, which shows that your EBITDA is up $40 million or 10% versus the prior year. You're saying metal prices are neutral. Efficiency savings are offset by inflation. I'm just wondering if you could maybe talk through what has changed to drive that large increase year on year. In particular, in Recycling, Recycling is up $40 million year on year. Maybe you can outline how much of that is PMM or what else has changed to lead to that significant increase. I'll stop there and then continue with the other questions. Yeah, Tristan, good morning. I'm just reflecting on your statement where you say Recycling is at $40 million. I don't know where. In EBITDA. No, I'm just trying to see what you refer to. Maybe you can explain the underlying drivers of the Recycling business, Wannes, and the different business units because that's a part of the. I guess the key question is cost efficiencies are offset by inflation, and the metal price is neutral, but you have an increase year on year. What's the underlying driver? Basically, in Recycling, what we have is last year in the Precious Metals Refining activity, this is where we had maintenance shut down, which we don't have in 2025. That is driving up the volumes that we process in Precious Metals Refining. At the same time, as Bart explained, there was a somewhat less favorable mix, and that is somewhat offsetting that volume increase. At the same time, in Recycling, what is also positive is a strong support is looking at jewelry and industrial metals where we have the current high gold prices, and that is driving that Recycling and Refining business. The over-the-counter type of scrap that comes in, that's driving that volume and the margin that we generate. Next to that, we have the Metals Management, the trading business, where the volatility on the PMs and the PGMs also contributed strongly. Got it. Thanks. That's helpful. I'm just wondering about your FX exposure. Some of your peers give a sensitivity to changes to $0.01 in the USD/EUR rate. Could you maybe give us some kind of indication there on how that works for you and how hedging impacts there as well? Thanks. Yeah. Looking at the magnitude of the forex impact, we highlighted there is a headwind of more than EUR 50 million. Over half, the majority of that comes from inflation, but there is an element related to forex. Now, very concrete for 2025, this is where we had hedged quite a bit of the exposure against the dollar, but also other currencies. We are less impacted by the volatility, by the fluctuations in forex. At the same time, we have subsidiaries that are recorded in different currencies, at euro, and where the results get translated into a result upon consolidation. This is primarily the impact that we are seeing in the forex effect. Great, thanks very much. Welcome. We will take our final question from Steen Demeester, ING. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Yes. Yes, good morning. Thanks, and thanks for taking my questions. Also, two, if I may. First, can you comment on the size, duration, and the nature of the newly disclosed contract with SK On? It seems to be a driver for sequentially higher catalytic volumes in the second half, yet it doesn't alter the guidance. Does this suggest that the ramp-up of your take or pay contracts is slower than previously assumed? Secondly, maybe related, in a recent press article, Volkswagen brand CEO Thomas Schaefer suggested to lean more on LFP for its entire lineup, starting with the ID.2 up until the ID.7 in a bid to lower costs. How should we interpret this announcement? Does it in some way alter your roadmap with IonWay? Okay, clear. First of all, on the SK contract, you should not see it on top of the trajectory that we have given in the Cobalt & Specialty Materials business. The Cobalt & Specialty Materials business really focused, let's say, on that 2028 roadmap, where it was included, let's say, in those numbers. This being said, in 2025, we see that ramp-up of IonWay as well as ACC and our numbers as well. Volumes are still more modest, but that's what the ramp-up also significantly means. There is a good probability that the SK contract will also flow over in 2026. To your question on Volkswagen in general, as you might remember, we have included two waves out of the 164 GW or 70 GW equivalent in our midterm plan. These waves are still confirmed and are underpinned by solid contracts. That's not changing anything to the equation versus what we communicated in March. Understood. Is it a sizable contract with SK On? It is one of the drivers of the 2025 volumes. If you look at the volumes that we have, indeed, it is with the current volumes that we have, it's a significant contract, yes. Great. Thank you. Thank you. Now, we'll take the next question. All right, I think this was the last. All right, I think this was the last. Yeah. Sorry, I cut your cue. As this was the last question, maybe a small wrap-up. Everybody, once more, thank you for being there. I know it's a busy season. Some of you, we will see you back, I believe, next week on Monday and the days after. We're looking forward to our exchange. In the meantime, wishing you all a wonderful rest of the day and weekend. Talk to you soon. Thank you. Bye-bye. Bye. Thank you for joining today's call. You may now disconnect.