Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Argonaut Gold's Fourth Quarter and Year-End 2023 Financial and Operating Results Call and Webcast. For today's call, phone participants are in listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will open the call to your questions and provide instructions at that time. As a reminder, this conference call is being recorded on March 6, 2024, at 10:00 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, and is being broadcast live via the Internet. During today's call, management will make statements regarding their expectations for the company's future financial and operating performance. These statements are considered forward-looking statements. Each forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date of this call, and actual results may differ materially from management expectations for a variety of reasons, including market and general economic conditions, and the risks and uncertainties detailed from time to time in the company's SEDAR+ filings. Today's presenters include Richard Young, Argonaut's President and CEO, Chuck Hennessey, Vice President of Canadian Operations, and David Ponczoch, CFO. The financial statements, management's discussion and analysis, and the slide presentation related to this call are available on the company's website at www.argonautgold.com. For self-advancing, I will now hand the call over to Mr. Richard Young. Well, thank you, Joel, and hello, everyone. Let's start with slide 3. I want to express my gratitude to all of our shareholders who have steadfastly supported Argonaut throughout the past year. Last week, when we announced our 2024 guidance, we witnessed a 35% sell-off of our stock. Despite this unexpected turn of events, we believe that Magino will one day be one of the largest and lowest- cost gold mines in Canada. Our financial results for 2023 were either largely in line or better than the prior year. As a result, we'll focus today's call on the most pressing issues we face as a company, namely, the ramp-up of the Magino Mine and mill, and the refinancing of our current debt facility to support both our short-term liquidity requirements through the ramp-up of Magino and an expansion of the Magino mill. While both the ramp-up of the mine and mill have been slower than we anticipated, it is not a reflection on the team at Magino. They are as capable a group as I've ever had the pleasure of working with. We have hosted several groups to site as part of the refinancing, and all groups have acknowledged their tenacity and their focus and their excellence. All the same, that the team at Magino understands what the issues are and have solid plans to address each of them. Normally, at this point, I would be turning the call over to Marc Leduc, our COO. However, given the importance of Magino, I will now turn the call over to Chuck Hennessey, our Vice President of Canadian Operations, who continues to navigate the ramp-up of Magino and will speak to the progress to date. Marc will be available for the Q&A. Chuck? Thank you, Richard. Turning to slide 4. Overall, 2023 consolidated annual production was 1% less than the low end of the company's annual guidance of 200,000-230,000 gold equivalent ounces. Our Florida Canyon Mine in Nevada and our Mexican mines had a solid year, surpassing the top end of production guidance on a combined basis by 9%. Magino met the target start date of commissioning the mill in mid-May. However, ramp-up of the mine and mill is taking longer than anticipated, resulting in the company missing consolidated production and negatively impacting the company's liquidity during the second half of the year. Turning to slide 5. Mine ore grades were lower than anticipated for 2023 as a result of lower than planned mining rates that delayed the release of higher- grade material. We also experienced challenges with selectively mining the high-grade parts of the ore body, which led to higher dilution. We have learned a lot about the ore body and have used that knowledge to improve our mining practice. We expect significant improvements in mine performance through the first half of 2024. Several catalysts are expected in the mine, including the implementation of the fleet management system, which is well underway, and we have already benefited from improved mining accuracy and increased productivity. Lastly, the commissioning of 4 haul trucks in Q1 and an additional PC 3000 shovel in Q2 will increase material movement, ensuring we meet design tonnage rates. The current 13-week plan, beginning February first, shows the total contained gold is projected to be within 1% of the reserve model as compared to grade control polygons. We are pleased to report that these changes are improving performance. For the first time, overall tonnage, grade, and ounces mined were in line with plan for the month of February. As a result of the higher dilution that I mentioned earlier, the average grade to the mill is expected to be approximately 5%-10% lower than in the technical report over the next 2-3 years, during the period of selective mining of the higher grade ore. It is important to note that life of mine grades and ounces are not expected to be impacted. Based on February's mine performance, we are confident that we can achieve mining rates as laid out in the tech report. The focus moving forward is to continue to refine the short-range planning model and to improve drill and blast and mining practices to reduce dilution. Turning to slide 6. The graph on slide 6 highlights the solid strides made by the Magino Mill team towards achieving daily nameplate throughputs in Q4. During the period, we have demonstrated that the mill is capable of achieving the nameplate throughput rates on a per- hour basis. In fact, the mill has demonstrated daily throughput rates well above the nameplate, 10,000 tons per day. On average, the shortfall on daily tons is mainly attributed to shortfalls in operating time. Fortunately, the major contributors to mill downtime are well understood, and the mill team is hard at work systematically addressing them. Mill recovery rates are in line with Technical Report design rates. Now, 2024 is off to a slower start as the team works through material handling challenges in the crushing plant. The most significant downtime events have been caused by poor quality belting, poorly designed material transfer chutes. As of today, two of our three major belts have been changed out, and the third belt is staged and ready to be replaced in the event of failure or in an upcoming mill shutdown. Additionally, we have engaged third-party specialists in reengineering problematic areas, and we expect this to be a relatively low-cost solution. During the scheduled January mill shutdown, we experienced a rubber- lined chute fire downstream of the SAG mill. Fortunately, nobody was injured, and the team promptly extinguished the fire. No permanent damage was done. However, a third of the consumable discharge trommel panels were damaged. Spare panels had been ordered several months prior, but had not yet arrived. Therefore, the damaged panels needed to be field modified prior to the mill startup. This temporary repair led to reduced mill throughput rates, as well as several follow-on downtime events totaling 60 hours. The procurement team expedited panels to site. However, the panels did not arrive on site for 4 weeks, and they were installed immediately. Neither the SAG nor any associated equipment sustained permanent damage. Also, during the January shut, a 3D ball mill liner scan was completed, indicating several months of liner life remaining. However, the liners began delaminating in February, resulting in 2 unplanned liner replacement shutdowns totaling 56 hours of mill downtime. The process team is working with reline contractors to schedule the timely replacement of the remaining low-quality liners to minimize process interruption. During the plant's ramp-up, the team has struggled with premature failure of wear parts, causing significant unplanned downtime, which has been exacerbated by a shortage of parts that have extended these downtimes. Overall, we expect to have the majority of the remaining known issues to be resolved over the next few months. However, the key focus is establishing robust maintenance processes as the operation matures. Overall, the plan is to complete the necessary works to improve equipment reliability and circuit optimization by mid-year, enabling an increase in mill throughput by approximately 10% by Q4. I'll now turn the call over to David Ponczoch, our CFO. Thank you, Chuck. Please turn to slide 7. Our detailed financial results for 2023 are outlined in our financial statements, and MD&A that have been filed on SEDAR and are available on our website. Overall, our key financial metrics for 2023 were either largely in line or better than the previous year. I'll focus on the expected cost and capital spending plans for 2024. At Magino, cash costs and AISC per gold ounce sold are expected to be higher than the 2022 technical report, given that production is lower and the operating costs and sustaining capital expenditures are higher than the technical report. For 2024, we expect sustaining capital at Magino of $61 million-$63 million, compared to $47 million in the technical report, with the largest amount spent on the next phase of the tailings management facility, and also including construction of a temporary truck shop, completion of the assay lab construction, mill upgrade projects, and equipment leases, which are running higher because of the requirement to bring equipment forward and the higher interest rates. Total operating costs and cost per ton are expected to be higher in the first half of the year, but improve in the second half of the year. Operating costs and unit costs are significantly higher than the technical report. Our focus for 2024 is to ramp up mining and milling to the planned rates in the technical reports. Once we've achieved that objective, we will then focus on improving efficiencies and lowering costs. The largest driver of improving our units and per ounce costs is to increase the mine and mill to create the scale required to maximize site cash flow. Please turn to slide 8. To provide sufficient liquidity during this ramp-up phase and for our future growth objectives, we have been working to complete a refinancing of our current debt package. We have received several favorable term sheets that support our liquidity needs. Each remain under consideration as we are targeting to close the refinancing by the end of April. Management believes a successful refinancing, along with the expected cash flows from operations, provide the liquidity to continue the ramp-up and expansion of the Magino Mine, as well as the leach pad and CIC projects at Florida Canyon. I'll now turn the call back over to Richard Young. Well, thank you, Dave. Now turning to slide 9. While the ramp-up of Magino has been slower than expected, as Chuck mentioned, we expect the mine and mill to have completed their respective ramp-ups by the end of the second quarter. Further, the mill optimization work is expected to offset the expected lower grades compared to the technical report, putting us back on track in 2025 to the tech report in terms of production. As Dave mentioned, we plan to complete the refinancing over the next 30-60 days to enhance liquidity and flexibility, and enable us to achieve our expansion goals, to take the Magino mill to a target of 15,000 tons per day. The higher throughput through the mill expansion should significantly improve free cash flow generation in the coming years. As I mentioned at the outset, we believe Magino will be one of the largest and lowest- cost gold mines in Canada. Operator, I'm sorry. Joel, can you please open the call for questions? Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. Should you have a question, please press star followed by the one on your touch-tone phone. You will hear a three-tone prompt acknowledging your request, and your questions will be pulled in the order they are received. Should you wish to decline from the polling process, please press star followed by the two. If you are using a speakerphone, please lift the handset before pressing any keys. One moment, please, for your first question. Your first question comes from Wayne Lam with RBC. Please go ahead. Hey, morning, guys. Good morning. Just, just wondering if you might be able to provide a little bit more detail on the lower mine grades to date at Magino in terms of reconciliation and the dilution issues. Just wondering if you could clarify on the grade guidance. Is that 5%-10% lower this year and then a rebound back to the 1.4-gram level next year? If it's lower grades anticipated near term, is there an offset to that in the back end of the mine plan and any read-through to grade impact with the upcoming reserve update? Yeah. So, Wayne, let me start off, and then I'll turn it over to Marc. So the guidance that we gave last week was that over the next three years from the tech report, the average grade is about 1.35, and we expect, based on what we're seeing as we reblock on standard mining units, we're seeing more medium grades, so the grades are coming down by 5%-10% over the next three years. But we don't expect the overall grade of the reserve to change or ounces, and we saw that through the month of February, where we saw lower grade, lower grade of the high grade, but we saw a very good match of the overall grade mined and ounces mined. I'll turn it over to Marc to talk about why we're seeing lower grades in the first part of the year. Yeah. Hi, Wayne. So the biggest issue we had is we had a particularly small mining block. I'm going to get into the weeds here a little bit. So we've previously in the plans, we thought we'd be better able to high grade the deposit, get more tons at that grade. But what tends to happen is these mixed together through just naturally making mineable shapes, which are more than four times bigger than those blocks. And then also through blasting, you get natural mixing. So we see a loss of high grade, total tons. We don't lose the ounces, but it makes it more difficult for us to selectively mine and therefore get a higher grade through the mill. So that's, w e really struggled with that the first part of the year. We also had a lot of different technology we threw, we've now at the mine. We have a very advanced, fleet management system with high- precision GPS and the shovels. That really improves what we're doing there. We have, it just came up, for the first full operating month in February, so we're tracking. Now we have that data with accurate numbers on the trucks. Before, it was all hand-calculated sheets. So, I would say going forward, that the 5%-10% is probably real and gonna be there. We are gonna be, look, when we are doing our reserve and resource updates, we're going to be planning on using the bigger blocks and reporting on that. So that will all be encompassed in any resource statements for using that now in our long- range and short-r ange planning. So, we basically now see, we can predict what we mine, it comes as seen. We are getting post-blast reconciliations. This is all new data because of the advanced systems we have, so we're really digging into that and understanding where our issues are and working better. I'm actually really happy with the mine. Paul Levesque, our GM up there, and Jeremy Gulliver, our mine manager, are doing a fantastic job up there. They've really turned things around at the mine. The mine is doing very well, I find. I don't know if that answered your question, but happy to talk if you have a follow-up. Yeah, no, that's really good detail. And then just curious, with some of the challenges that you've had the past few months at the mill in terms of availability. Just wondering if there's any kind of performance guarantees in place with Ausenco, where you might be compensated for the replacement in some of these components or the longer- than- anticipated ramp- up to design? Yeah, Wayne, this is Chuck. That's a great question. A lot of these, a lot of these failures are really just consumables. They're of a lower quality than we had had put in our stock, frankly. So things like the three belts, they're major belts, I've not seen belts fail this way before, and I've got a maintenance background. I've been in the industry 36 years. So, you know, is there a performance guarantee from Ausenco? This is, y ou know, this always boils down to, does the plant do what it's supposed to do? And I tell people, this is a very well-designed plant. These consumables have been problematic. They have caused some downtime. You know, particularly changing belts, the first time you do it is always a bit of a struggle, and then you get a bit, a rhythm going to set up, you know, different areas for splice stations. So likely not a lot to claim back on Ausenco. Those things that we can, we obviously do. But for us, the focus with the team is just get through the issues and move forward. Okay, great. Thanks. And then, just, just moving to Florida Canyon, it seems like quite a capital spend this year for the construction of the additional leach pad. Was there any consideration to kind of placing the mine on pause to kind of preserve the balance sheet amidst the ramp up at Magino? And in terms of optimizations at the mine, which have been kind of evaluated over the past few years, how should we kind of think about the longer term production cost outlook there? It's Marc again, Wayne, and Rich may comment a little bit, add to this, but I'll just go on the sort of technical side. We were running out of pad space, so we really can't run Florida Canyon unless we build the Phase III A pad. So it would be a concept of shutting down the mine. On a cash cost basis, it makes money, and it's going to make money for the next 6 or 7 years of what we know. I think it's got a lot of good oxide potential. There's a sulfide deposit there. I'm not going to make too much of that, but we still want to understand, see if there's some potential there. But certainly, it will continue to be producing in that 60,000-70,000 ounce range at these kind of grades and, you know, stripping ratios for one, you know, a 0.5 stripping ratio. The key to Florida Canyon is driving tons, lots of tons. Putting a lot of run of mine in there. We've got the crushing plant, so we do about 900,000 tons through the crusher and then another 300,000–400,000 tons a month run of mine. And if you do that, it starts to get a good divisor, and you can get through your G&A costs, and it makes money. So that's been the key to doing it. But when we push the tons, we also need to upgrade our processing plant so it can handle more flow. So tons equals flow, more flow. So we're doing that, and that's all. Unfortunately, a lot of things at Florida Canyon got delayed because of the building in Magino, and now the chickens have come, kind of come home to roost. You know, we have some obligations for hedges, and so these are profitable cash cost ounces that make the company money, and they've done a really fantastic job, the team there. Greg Robinson, our GM out there, has really kept things in line, and the team, the whole team has worked to make it pretty well. I don't know, Rich, if you want to add anything. You know, it's kind of painful that we do it, and you're absolutely right, but you know, it would be hard to lose those ounces. Yeah, Wayne, I think Marc covered it off. So from a financial standpoint, the refinancing that we're doing provides the liquidity, you know, over the next six months, this period of high capital spend, both at Magino and Florida Canyon, that really can't be avoided to optimize the NAV of the assets and address the hedge book. And so, you know, we've had several refinancers look through the financials and provide term sheets that give us that flexibility, not only to address the liquidity through the first half of the year, but as well to complete that expansion, as we talked about in December, with the equity raise to 15,000 tons per day. So again, until we finalize the refi, we can't really talk in detail about it, but it will provide the flexibility that we need operationally and financially to move forward. Wayne, just Marc again, I just want to add, it's not on Florida Canyon, but we have put on care and maintenance or like La Colorada M ine, there's money to be made there. It's a very good asset, but we had to balance which one should we keep in play. So we have had some pain here to figure out, you know, our best way forward to control costs and cap them. Okay. Yeah, thanks, understood. And then maybe just a last one for me, on the debt refi. Will that involve an increase in the current facility size, or, or is that just, deferring some of the start and the repayments? And then just curious if you're looking at a more comprehensive, financing package that will also encompass, the convert due next year as well? So it's Richard again, Wayne. So the refinancing is to take the banks out and provide a facility that matches our cash flow and growth needs. So again, we need more flexibility than the current structure allows, and so it'll be a completely new facility. And it does not reflect taking out or incorporate taking out the converts next year. We'll deal with that next year. Okay, great. Yeah, thanks for taking my questions, and thanks for the detail, and hopefully, things are getting back on track now, and best of luck in the months ahead. Thank you, Wayne. Your next question comes from John Sclodnick with Desjardins. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Yeah, thanks for taking my question. Just first on, I guess, Magino, you contemplated some changes for the crushing and grinding circuit there, just to improve throughput rates. Just curious if you're, yeah, really, what's entailed in that, and if there's going to be any impact to OpEx? Yeah, this is Chuck. There's not a lot of design change, so it actually runs really well. The static grizzly at the primary crusher, we're replacing far more open area. We're moving, trying to move away from everything being loaded into to the crusher with front-end loaders to being able to direct tip trucks. That will reduce our costs. There's a couple of minor chute modifications that we've got to get on with, but frankly, the design is fine. The thing runs well. You know, it's a matter of getting this last belt replaced, getting through these chute issues. You know, some of it we found just because of the winter we've had. We've had freeze-thaw cycles all winter long, and so frost buildup, it's really allowed us to kind of bed down the plant. I'm really pleased with the way the team is taking it on, so I'm not concerned at all. Okay. And then, with the fleet modifications there, is that factored into the guidance? And what kind of timing are you looking at, based on that guidance? Okay, so it's important at Magino for ore release to get our tonnage up. We are anticipating just the plant running better and being at 12,000 tons a day, coming in with it with just some additional optimization in the middle, some pulp lifters, and they've got some. Chuck might give you a little bit better color on that. So that's the reason we're getting that one more big shovel and the four new haul trucks, and we're commissioning a new blasthole drill. So yeah, that's all worked into our costs. I think we automatically saw we went from around about 45,000 tons a day to north of 60,000 tons a day by just flicking on the fleet management system. There is a linear programming optimization of dispatching in that. A lot of it is, you know, people understanding the controls of time. So instantly, we saw a big productivity jump just by having those in the truck, you know, people starting on time, not staying their lunches. So, yeah, I think we're actually gonna knock it out of the park in the mine this year with that. So, we will take that all into account from the mining. It is in the guidance for the cost-wise, but, like I said, I'm not worried about the mine, really. They're on the road to success. We've got lots of things to improve, but we've given them all the tools they need to improve the quality. Right. Okay. Sorry, go ahead. Just coming back to the guidance. So the guidance reflects a weak Q1 because we're in lower grade areas of the pit, the lower throughput rates through the first half of the year as we work through those issues, and the lower expected grade in the high-grade areas of the deposit. So the 1.0-1.30 fully encapsulates all that. Okay, perfect. And just last thing with the guys. Just curious, what Canadian dollar assumptions are included there? The Canadian dollar assumptions there? CAD 1.35 was the assumption. Perfect. Okay, that's great. And, yeah, the rest of my questions have been asked and answered already. Thanks very much, guys. Thanks, John. Thanks, John. Ladies and gentlemen, as a reminder, should you have a question, please press star followed by the one. There are no further questions at this time. Please proceed. Well, thank you, John. One moment, please. I just wanna thank everybody for attending the call today. I apologize for the challenges that we've been going through. The ramp-up has been much slower than we would have liked, but we are well on track, both within the mine and the mill. We're moving to, you know, target rates as laid out in the tech report, and we believe that, yes, we're going to see lower high grade than was in the tech report, but that should be more than offset as we exit the year with higher throughput, putting us back on track production-wise, and we'll continue to work on the cost structure and the expansion to generate strong free cash flows as we expand this mine moving forward. Thank you for your time today. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.