Thank you, Operator. Good afternoon and welcome everyone to Amerigo Resources' quarterly conference call to discuss the company's financial results for the third quarter of 2025. We appreciate you joining us today. This call will cover Amerigo Resources' financial and operating results for the third quarter ended September 30, 2025. Following our prepared remarks, we will open the conference call to a question-and-answer session. Our call today will be led by Amerigo Resources' President and Chief Executive Officer, Aurora Davidson, along with the company's Chief Financial Officer, Carmen Amezquita. Before we begin with our formal remarks, I would like to remind everyone that some of the statements on this conference call may be forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not necessarily limited to, financial projections or other statements of the company's plans, objectives, expectations, or intentions. These matters involve certain risks and uncertainties. The company's actual results may differ significantly from those projected or suggested by any forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors which are discussed in detail in our CDAR filings. I will now hand the call over to Aurora Davidson. Please go ahead, Aurora. Thank you. Welcome to Amerigo's earnings call for the third quarter of 2025. Q3 2025 was a quarter of strong execution and resilience for Amerigo and our MVC operation in Chile. On July 31, El Teniente faced a tragic accident resulting in MVC ceasing to receive fresh tailings for 10 days. Since the accident, MVC has received lower throughput from fresh tailings than normal under the original annual budget. This condition led to a decline in monthly production in August, followed by a production recovery in September. The timely adjustments made by MVC to reduce the impact of lower fresh tailings throughput included increased historic tailings processing and fine-tuning of the concentrator plant. The lower August production forced us to adjust our copper production guidance from GBP 62.9 million to a range of GBP 60 million-GBP 61.5 million. Our production results in October have been strong, and we remain confident in the revised guidance. Despite the impact of El Teniente's accident, during the third quarter, MVC maintained a high plant availability of 98% and continued to operate without lost-time accidents or environmental incidents. These metrics reflect the strength of our operational planning and the dedication of our on-the-ground team. Stable copper prices and strong MOLY contributions supported total revenue of $52.5 million in the third quarter. The LME copper prices rose from an average of $4.32 per pound in the second quarter to an average price of $4.44 per pound in Q3, peaking at a monthly average price of $4.51 per pound in September. I will provide my comments on the copper market later in the call. Net income for the quarter was $6.7 million, with earnings per share of $0.04. The company generated operating cash flow of $12.4 million, excluding changes in working capital, and free cash flow to equity of $11.1 million. In line with the company's capital return strategy, or CRS, a quarterly dividend of CA$0.03 per share, or $3.5 million, was paid. Amerigo's quarter-end position was $28 million. MOLY production was 350,000 pounds, and MOLY prices averaged $24.11 per pound during the quarter. When looking at the cash cost metric, this resulted in a credit of $0.57 per pound, enabling MVC to post a cash cost of $1.80 per pound, which was lower than the $1.82 per pound of the second quarter and the $2.22 per pound of the first quarter. Based on these strong cash cost results, we have maintained our original annual cash cost guidance of $1.93 per pound. This guidance excludes MVC's collective bargaining costs. Amerigo's financial performance continues to reflect the strength of our business model and the resilience of our operations. Carmen will walk you through the detailed financials shortly. I want to discuss three important events that occurred in October subsequent to the end of the third quarter. On the 27th, MVC fully repaid its outstanding debt. At the end of September, this debt totaled $7.5 million. Eliminating outstanding debt was one of the objectives for this year and marked the conclusion of a transformational 10-year period for Amerigo. When the company took on $100 million in debt, it was part of a strategic decision to invest in Chile and MVC's growth. This decision laid the foundation for a long-term copper-producing operation that could navigate market cycles without diluting shareholder ownership. From the beginning, we were clear: debt should not be a permanent fixture. It was a tool, and like any good tool, it had a purpose and a timeline. Every debt repayment was a step towards greater financial strength and flexibility. Our final debt repayment affirmed the correctness of that strategic decision. It also reflects the company's resilience and commitment to shareholders. Also, on October 27th, Amerigo's board of directors increased the quarterly dividend paid to shareholders to $0.04 Canadian per share. This is a 33% increase from the prior dividend and double the initial dividend under the current CRS. This dividend increase will allocate roughly 50% of the annual additional free cash flow that will become available from not carrying debt. It is an important signal of the board's vision for the future because, as we mentioned from day one at the CRS, the quarterly dividend is set at a rate that is sustainable in the foreseeable future, irrespective of short-term copper price cyclicality. This is a new floor for shareholders, and as has been the case in the last four years, additional distributions will continue to be made through share buybacks and performance dividends. The final significant event I want to comment on occurred on October 22nd. On that day, MVC signed a three-year collective agreement with its main union, the Operators Union, which has 210 members. Collective agreements play a crucial role in Chile's mining industry. These agreements maintain labor peace and provide a structured framework for negotiating wages, working hours, benefits, and bonuses. The agreements must balance the strength or weakness of copper prices at the time of negotiation while ensuring access to a skilled workforce and the specific economics of the operation. We had a constructive negotiation with our workers and reached a fair agreement for both parties. Now, I will move on to our commentary on the copper market. The long-term themes of surging demand and supply constraints remain significant. A third important element that cannot be ignored is geopolitical interference in the marketplace. Let's start with the obvious: supply constraints and disruptions. A copper supply deficit between 300,000 and 500,000 tons is now forecast for this year. This has already pushed copper prices upwards, as evidenced by October's average LME price over $4.84 per pound. In addition to the trend of declining ore grades, specific mine disruptions at Grasberg, Kamoa-Kakula, and El Teniente have resulted in the loss of around 518,000 tons of copper this year. Looking beyond 2025, companies such as Antofagasta Minerals and Teck have already downgraded their 2026 copper guidance. Freeport and Ivanhoe Mines will likely do the same following physical inspections of their impacted mines. As I mentioned a minute ago, the current global copper supply has tightened, resulting in a deficit. This bottleneck is driven by copper concentrate availability, which has been affected by production shortfalls at the mines. At the same time, due to overinvestment, the world now has too many smelters to refine copper concentrates. This situation is reflected by the size and the movement of treatment and refining charges, or TCRCs. These are the fees that smelters charge miners to process copper concentrates into refined copper. Treatment charge, or TC, is the cost to process the concentrate at the smelter. Refining charge, or RC, is the cost to refine the metal from the concentrate. TCRCs are subtracted from the copper price to determine how much miners actually earn per ton of concentrate. When TCRCs are low, miners earn more, and when they're high, smelters take a larger share. Until 2025, TCRCs were negotiated annually between major copper miners and smelters via breach terms known as a TCRC annual benchmark governed long-term contracts. There is also a spot TCRC market for short-term or one-up deals, which reflects real-time market conditions and is volatile. Smelters are currently struggling to secure feedstock, which has pushed spot TCRCs into negative territory. Despite the negative spot TCRCs, smelters have been able to survive thanks to byproduct credits from other metals in the concentrates they process, such as gold or silver. However, negative TCRCs clearly put significant financial pressure on smelters, whose business models depend on virtually continuous operation. In recognition of the financial stress imposed on smelters, Freeport, which is one of the traditional benchmark setters, has just abandoned the global TCRC benchmark model and has proposed a new floor cap contract model to protect the smelter margins. This model sets minimum and maximum TCRC levels, providing greater stability in volatile market conditions, such as the recent negative TCRC spot terms. In 2026, we may see a different landscape moving from the traditional stable benchmark-based system to floor cap models. However, we could also continue to see negative TCRCs under which, instead of miners paying smelters, smelters will pay miners. We may also see multi-year contracts instead of annual or shorter-term contracts, and a shift from TCRCs being the primary revenue source for smelters to a reliance on byproducts. In other words, one of the longest-term features of the copper market is currently under review, and this is all because of long-term stresses on copper supply, which we do not anticipate will change anytime soon. On the demand side, the global need for copper is expected to rise year on year, at least until 2035. Demand may be shifting regionally, but global total demand is not slowing. The main drivers of growth fall into two big buckets: electrification and digitalization. A few years ago, digitalization was not even discussed seriously in analysis of future copper demand. Tariffs, such as a 50% U.S. tariff on most finished and semi-finished copper products, are also affecting trade flows and regional inventory balances. Speculative trading continues, and we know it was very pronounced earlier this year, as shown by the differences between LME and COMEX copper prices. Geopolitical conflicts or their resolutions can also strengthen or weaken the U.S. dollar, which affects copper prices. Governments are now actively investing in mining companies and, in some cases, prioritizing certain projects. Political intervention, resource nationalism, and regulatory shifts will impact market behavior. All of these factors could lead to a copper market in 2026 that remains volatile but elevated. To end my macro comments, I will mention that Chile will now hold general elections shortly. The first round will be on November 16, followed by a run-up, which is usually the case, on December 14, 2025. The presidential inauguration will be on March 11, 2026. Current polls suggest that none of the candidates will get 50% or more of the votes on the first round, and that will lead the contenders to a run-up. With Janet Jara of the center-left coalition Unidad por Chile and José Antonio Cast of the Republican Party, who has a far-right stance, being the most likely candidates. In this run-up scenario, José Antonio Cast, a pro-business, pro-mining candidate, would likely win the election. I will conclude my remarks with a few comments about the continued success of our capital return strategy. Only a month ago, we reached the fourth anniversary of the CRS, which, as you know, comprises quarterly dividends, performance dividends, and share buybacks. Over the past four years, we have used the three components to return $93.7 million to shareholders. 60% of the return has come from dividends, paying a cumulative dividend of $0.51 Canadian per share, and 33% from buybacks, retiring 25.6 million shares or 14% of the shares outstanding at the start of the CRS. We recently published a video that illustrates the benefits of the CRS for shareholders. The video is on our website, and in it, we noted that on a total return to shareholders' basis, Amerigo Resources has outperformed mid-tier copper producers, copper ETFs, and copper futures since October of 2021. Total returns measure share appreciation and dividends, but they cannot capture the benefit of share buybacks, which ultimately benefits shareholders by reducing the number of shares in which dividends are paid. To better capture the effect of buybacks, we undertook another analysis. That analysis identified another powerful aspect of investing in Amerigo Resources. Buying Amerigo Resources shares is a very cost-effective way to own copper. We have shown that over the last four years, it has been cheaper to buy a pound of copper by buying Amerigo Resources shares than to buy it at the LME. In relation to a pound of copper produced by Amerigo in each CRS year, we have shown that it was extremely inexpensive to purchase a pound of copper through owning Amerigo shares. In other words, in relation to the underlying commodity, there was a clear undervaluation of Amerigo's share price, especially before the CRS was introduced. The other avenues of return provided by Amerigo, share appreciation, dividends, and buybacks, were all magnified by the positive impact of that discount on a per pound of copper produced basis. Since the CRS was launched, Amerigo's share price, and therefore the cost of its shares per pound of copper produced, has increased. This is what we wanted, and that is what investors wanted as well. Consequently, that original discount to LME copper has become smaller over time. However, even if the discount has decreased, buying Amerigo shares still remains the most cost-effective way to own a pound of copper compared to a basket of benchmarks. Our analysis also showed that, in all cases except Amerigo, investors in the benchmark companies have been purchasing one pound of copper at a premium to LME copper prices. In other words, controlling a pound of copper through holding other shares in the benchmark has a higher cost than the LME copper price. For investors seeking maximum exposure to copper per investment dollar, this outcome is crucial. It shows that Amerigo is a here-and-now copper play. In Amerigo, you are not paying for future growth or for investing in other metals. When buying shares of Amerigo, you have not been paying the high earnings multiple that is expected for growth stocks. You are controlling a pound of copper as cheaply as possible and more effectively than peers and copper itself. To conclude, Amerigo's returns over the four years of the CRS have come in four flavors: share appreciation, dividends, buybacks, and a discount to the LME copper price. As share appreciation has increased, the discount has decreased. Dividends and buybacks have fueled this performance. Amerigo's CRS has been a game changer for shareholders, outperforming other copper investments. This has occurred on a total return per share and on a per pound of copper basis. Amerigo rewards shareholders with predictable, consistent dividends, performance dividends when copper prices rise, no dilution, and the most efficient way to control a pound of copper. We are now debt-free. We look forward to many more years of success for the company and its shareholders. Amerigo's CFO, Carmen Amezquita, will now discuss the company's financial results. Carmen, please go ahead. Thanks, Aurora. I'm pleased to present the financial report for the third quarter of 2025 from Amerigo and its MVC operation in Chile. During the three months ended September 30, 2025, the company posted a net income of $6.7 million, earnings per share of $0.04 or CAD 0.06, and EBITDA of $18.7 million. The increase in net income to $6.7 million compared to $2.8 million in Q3 2024 was a result of stronger fair value adjustments to copper revenue receivables and lower smelting and refining charges in response to the 2025 annual benchmark terms. Specifically, in this third quarter, there were $1.3 million in positive fair value adjustments compared to $2.7 million in negative fair value adjustments in Q3 2024, and smelting and refining charges decreased by $3 million. Revenue in Q3 was $52.5 million compared to $45.4 million in Q3 2024. This included copper tolling revenue of $44.1 million and molybdenum revenue of $8.3 million. In Q3 2025, the gross value of copper tolled on behalf of DET was $67.2 million. From this gross revenue, we deducted notional items, including DET royalties of $20.6 million, smelting and refining of $3.4 million, and transportation of $0.4 million, and then added positive fair value adjustments to settlement receivables of $1.3 million. Revenue also included molybdenum revenue of $8.3 million. We reported a provisional copper price of $4.54 per pound on our Q3 2025 sales. This provisional price includes mark-to-market adjustments based on the LME price curve as of September 30. The final settlement prices for July, August, and September 2025 sales will be the average LME prices for October, November, and December 2025, respectively. A 10% increase or decrease from the $4.54 per pound provisional price used on September 30, 2025, would result in a $6.8 million change in revenue in Q4 2025 regarding Q3 2025 production. Tolling and production costs increased 4% from $38.1 million in Q3 2024 to $39.5 million in Q3 2025. The most significant cost variances between the two quarters included an increase in lime costs of $0.8 million, as more lime consumption is in line with more historic tailings processing. Increased inventory adjustments of $0.5 million from more copper delivered than produced during the quarter. An increase in DET moly royalties of $1.3 million was the result of stronger prices and production during the quarter. The gross profit after revenue and production costs was $13 million compared to $7.4 million in Q3 2024, a $5.6 million increase. General and administrative expenses were $1.2 million compared to $0.9 million in the prior year quarter. These expenses included salaries, management, and professional fees of $0.6 million, office and general expenses of $0.4 million, and share-based payments of $0.2 million. Other losses were $0.6 million compared to other gains of $0.6 million in the third quarter of 2024, which were driven mainly by foreign exchange fluctuations. Finance expense was $0.3 million, down from $0.9 million, with the difference driven by lower interest expense from a lower loan balance in Q3 2025, as well as a $0.3 million expense in Q3 2024 related to the fair value of interest rate swaps. Income tax expense was $4.5 million compared to $3.3 million in Q3 2024. Included in the income tax expense in Q3 2025 is $4.9 million in current tax expense and $0.4 million in deferred income tax recovery. Deferred income tax is an accounting figure used to reconcile timing differences and, in Amerigo's case, primarily arises from the differences in timing of financial and tax depreciation. Current tax expense in Q3 2025 was $4.9 million compared to $4.4 million in Q3 2024. Before moving on to the statement of financial position, I want to mention some non-IFRS measures used by the company: cash cost, total cost, and all-in sustaining costs. In Q3 2025, Amerigo's cash cost was $1.80 per pound, decreasing from $1.93 per pound in Q3 2024, with the reduction primarily coming from a $0.16 per pound decrease in smelting and refining charges and an increase of $0.25 per pound in moly byproduct credits, offset by increases of $0.07 per pound in power costs, $0.07 per pound in lime costs, $0.04 per pound in maintenance, and $0.03 per pound in other direct costs. Total cost increased to $3.71 per pound, up $0.17 from Q3 2024's $3.54 per pound. This was the result of an increase of $0.27 per pound in DET notional royalties as a result of higher copper prices and $0.03 per pound in depreciation, offset by a decrease of $0.13 per pound in cash cost. All-in sustaining costs increased to $3.85 per pound from $3.72 per pound in Q3 2024 due to increases of $0.17 per pound in total costs and $0.02 per pound in corporate G&A expenses, offset by a decrease of $0.06 in sustaining CapEx. Moving on to the statement of financial position. On September 30, 2025, the company held cash and cash equivalents of $28 million and restricted cash of $3.1 million, with a working capital of $0.9 million, up from a working capital deficiency of $6.5 million on December 31, 2024. Trade and accounts payable decreased from $24.6 million as of December 31, 2024, to $20.2 million at the end of September 2025. Current income tax liabilities decreased from $8.5 million at the end of December to $0.1 million at September 30, 2025, due mostly to the $8 million in taxes related to 2024 that were paid at the end of April when MVC's annual tax declaration was filed in Chile. For 2025, MVC's income tax at the end of September is almost fully offset by the $5.1 million in monthly tax installment payments made by MVC during the year. You will notice that the company's debt was shown as $7.3 million net of transaction fees. This debt was fully paid in October. This puts Amerigo in a zero debt position, providing additional free cash flow capacity. Regarding cash flows during the quarter, Amerigo generated $12.4 million in cash flow from operations. Net operating cash flow, which includes the changes in non-cash working capital, was $11.8 million. In terms of cash during the quarter, $1.3 million was used for investing activities, in other words, for CapEx payments, and $5.7 million was used in financing activities. These financing activities included Amerigo's quarterly dividend payment of $3.5 million and a transfer of $2.2 million to restricted cash, which was used to pay the debt in October, leaving the company with a nil balance in restricted cash going forward. Briefly touching on the results for the first three quarters of the year, our cash cost for the nine months ended September 30, 2025, was $1.93 per pound and was in line with guidance. Our forecast indicates that we're on track to meet the company's 2025 guidance of an annual normalized cash cost of $1.93 per pound. Our normalized cash cost guidance excludes the signing bonus paid in Q4 in connection with MVC's three-year collective labor agreement with the operators' union. The agreement will be effective until October 29, 2028, and MVC will pay $4 million to its operators in Q4 2025 as a signing bonus. In 2025, MVC is expected to incur CapEx of $13 million, of which $4.4 million is optimization CapEx, $4.4 million is sustaining CapEx, and $4.2 million is CapEx associated with the annual plant maintenance shutdown and strategic spares. In the first three quarters of 2025, CapEx additions were $7.8 million and CapEx payments were $9.5 million. We currently expect actual CapEx to trend slightly below our annual CapEx guidance. We will report Amerigo's full year 2025 financial results in February 2026 and want to thank you for your continued interest in the company. We will now take questions from call participants. Operator, can you start on the Q&A? Yes, sorry. I must have been on mute. Sorry about that. The Q&A will begin now, and your first question will be coming from Dale Miller, an investor. Dale, please go ahead. Hi, Aurora. I think you and your team have done an outstanding job, both from the miners all the way through your organization. However, I do have one minor question. I am surprised that the board of directors has been selling actively, stocks as opposed to buying stocks. Now, I know you can't explain why they're selling in particular. The picture ahead seems very rosy with the debt being paid down to zero, three-year agreement, and copper prices on a trend upward. I don't understand the lack of interest in buying your stock from the board of directors. Thank you. Again, thank you for your total organization and your efforts. Dale, thank you for your question. It is a good question. You mentioned that there are directors selling. We have indications of two of seven directors with sale transactions this year. Just to complete the picture here, five directors have not sold anything. In fact, most of the directors, when we acquire additional shares through the exercise of In the Money options, we're holders of those shares and we keep them. If there are individual sale events from independent directors, they have their own personal reasons to do so, and it would be probably fair to see them in the context of their total holdings and the time that they have held shares of the company. There was one significant transaction by a longtime director that has been. A thorough supporter of the company through thick and skin, and he had some sales to make for personal reasons. In the process of being a decade or longer director, there may be times when you have to sell shares. I wouldn't take it out of context. I wouldn't misinterpret it as a sign of a misalignment or lack of interest in the company. There are personal requirements for either tax planning or estate planning or diversification that come through from time to time, and we have to acknowledge them. In overall terms, when you're looking at the overall picture, there is obviously a keen interest in directors, including myself and including the founder of a company, Dr. Steinkrug, to hold on to our shares for the long term. We are happy recipients of the CRS benefits as well. I hope that answers the question. Yes, thank you. Thank you. Your next question comes from Terry Fisher with CIBC. Please go ahead. Yes, congratulations again on another terrific quarter, particularly given the problems at El Teniente. I guess we're getting used to that now. It's almost boring, these wonderful quarters that keep coming out. I hope you're not building expectations too high. We're very happy. Anyway, I only have two quick ones for you. Number one, MOLY's becoming even more important these days, and it's been notoriously volatile over the years. I'm wondering if you could give us a little bit of color on the MOLY outlook for the MOLY market. My other question, I'm just going to table both questions, is that I heard, and I can't remember the source, that Codelco is looking at maybe under some pressure, perhaps from the government, to get a bit more active with CapEx and adopting more modern technology in order to expand production and also to reduce the risk of accidents and so on. I'm wondering if that is true, and if so, would it open up any further opportunities for Amerigo? Terry, on the MOLY market commentary, it has been quite stable for the last years. We saw a price spike in MOLY prices two and a half years ago to around the range of $30 per pound. If you look at our numbers for Q3, we had an average price of $24 per pound, which is really good. We had budgeted a lower number than that, so we're happy with the results. The MOLY market is a volatile market. No one seems to understand it. A bit of a black box. We don't consider ourselves experts on MOLY. You will see that I don't waste any of the shareholders' time with my commentary on the MOLY market because there is really nothing I can contribute to it. We try to dig for as much information as we can, and even from our clients, we don't get very clear responses. We'll take it as positive when we see the, sorry, the price appreciations that we saw in Q3. It's a good additional layer to have in the business, but that's about it. I think that we have to remain focused on the copper operation, on the copper outlook, and consider MOLY a good addition that we really don't have a lot of control on. With respect to your second question, the only thing I can comment on was a recent press article where the Chair of Codelco was explaining different initiatives that they're following up in terms of automation, specifically for the deeper levels of their underground mines, which, of course, is making a reference to El Teniente. That's good news. The fact that they are looking actively and investing as they have done in the past is not something new. I think they're just expanding or magnifying their efforts, but they're not initiating their efforts in terms of automation. That's all good news, that the strength of Codelco could represent additional opportunities for us in the future. That's all I can say about it. Okay, that's great. Muchas gracias. Thank you. Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one. Your next question comes from Ben Pirie with Atrium Research. Please go ahead. Hi, Aurora. Congrats on another strong quarter considering the shutdown. Certainly great to see the debt being fully paid down and the dividend increase. Just on the shutdown quickly, I think I can speak for most investors that we're pleased with how you managed and minimized the production loss, or at least the loss in tailings flow. Can you actually just touch on what initiatives the company took to minimize that impact and just where we're at in terms of that fresh tailings flow coming back online? Yes. Thanks for the question, Ben. It was a challenge that the team at MVC faced quite well. Our production impact was twofold. One was the immediate one for 10 days of not receiving fresh tailings at MVC. Immediately, we ramped up on the ground the processing of historic tailings to minimize the impact. To the extent that that was done quickly and continues in place to date, that is one of the significant aspects that we did. In addition to that, we have taken advantage of having more plant capacity. The most volume-centric part of our operation are the fresh tailings, and that's where we get most of the volume, and it is the feed that takes up most of the real estate in our concentrator plant. To the extent that we have had some of that freed up, we've been able to tweak part of the operation in terms of improving classification. We have less material to classify. We have very good dilution at the moment that further increases our classification. We are redirecting some of the flows within the concentrator, and that has also allowed for increased residence times, which have a positive impact on recovery. We also have two projects that have come online which were part of our optimization projects for this year, which included improvements to the cascade operation, and that has also contributed to increased recovery. We have lower volume of fresh. We are compensating for that with more processing of historic tailings, but we have been able to increase recoveries of fresh, and that is one of the drivers that has helped us mitigate production losses. In fact, I think it's fair to state that we only had a production impact during the month of August. September was back to normal, and we have strong results as well for October. Great, thank you. Certainly impressive considering the small drop in your guidance for the annual guidance there. Just sort of reflecting on Q1 and Q2 in terms of share buybacks, we saw a lot of action on the NCIB in the first half of the year, but little to none in Q3. Was this primarily because of the shutdown, and you just wanted to hold back a little cash in the till? Or can you provide a little bit of color into that Q3 drop on the buybacks? I think it's difficult to try to divide the activity on buybacks on a quarter-on-quarter basis. There are a series of factors that go into play as to how to allocate the surplus cash to additional distributions. As you know, one of our key commitments, the minimal commitment we have with respect to buying back shares, is not to have dilution for shareholders year on year. It makes sense to get your commitments out of the way as soon as you can in the year, and so there was significantly more activity. In fact, in the second quarter, we had completed our sort of weaker quarter of the year in terms of production associated with maintenance shutdowns. Copper prices were doing good. We were committed to buying back at least the amount of shares that were being issued on exercise of options, and we still had six months ahead of us to continue with the key objective of reducing debt. We were not in a hurry to repay the debt in the second quarter. Come the third quarter, we had this interruption in the month of August, which always makes us more careful about managing the capital. We're always careful, but even more careful. We also saw the opportunity as copper prices started to strengthen in September of basically taking care of the debt first in the third quarter. There are a series of annual objectives. How you organize them throughout the year depends on a number of circumstances, a lot of management judgment and board decisions also have to be considered in terms of the intra-quarter allocation of the funds. I think what's important to consider here is not so much the comparison of activity of one quarter to the preceding one, but just the general annual path of continuing to return cash to shareholders. We know our timing, so we have a good view on what's happening around us and ahead of us. We try to organize it as best as we can. The general objective is the important one, and that is do what you said you're going to do, produce what you said you were going to produce, and keep returning that additional cash to shareholders. Absolutely. I think you made the right call with paying down the debt as shareholders clearly liked that news yesterday with the stock being up so much. I'm just staying on this line of questioning, and I'll be quick here so other people can get in the mix. Just around the conservative approach you just mentioned with allocating some of your cash flow. Obviously, with paying down this debt, now you have additional cash flow, and in the press release yesterday, you mentioned roughly 50% of that new cash flow will go to the increased dividend. Can you just touch on what you guys plan to do with that remaining 50%? That sort of goes with the conservative approach. I think you're taking your time with that decision. Yes. Thanks for the question, Ben. To use some numbers and provide the context here, we were amortizing our debt at the tune of $7 million in principal payments per year. Last year, our debt expense was $2 million. We have in front of us a figure of $9 million that is being freed up. The decision of allocating essentially 50% of that, the additional $0.04 Canadian in dividends, will have a cost of $4.7 million on an annual basis. Give or take, 50% of the cash that has been freed up now has a placeholder, and that placeholder is the increased quarterly dividend. The cash that remains remains as cash that is available to the company. The company does not have intensive capital requirements. That has been the stable position and one of the premises of having the CRS. The obvious avenue of allocation would be additional distributions, which, as you know, are performance dividends and buybacks. I hope that answers the question. We wanted to have a clear path of showing the shareholders how that cash was going to be allocated. Now 50% of it has been already committed in what we're seeing is a structural change through the quarterly dividend increase. The rest remains to be allocated in the Amerigo normal course of business. Let's call it that. Understood. Okay. Thank you. Looking forward to seeing that. That's all I had today. Your next question comes from John Polcari with Mutual of America Capital Management. Please go ahead. Thank you. You, along with everybody else, congratulations on achieving key strategic objectives. I really only have one question, and that is, what are your thoughts regarding royalty payments as the price escalates, price of copper escalates, perhaps into the mid to high $5.00 per pound range or maybe even higher? I think the agreement on the royalties, when it was originally constructed, had limits on the upside. Can you just address that or give me your thoughts on where that would go and maybe any changes to the agreement as prices escalate? John, that's a good question. Let me back up a little bit here to give you a well-rounded answer. The royalty is essentially the compensation that we give El Teniente for letting us work with their tailings. It is a significant driver of the success of the long-term relationship between MVC and El Teniente because it basically provides a mechanism for. Sharing of the economic benefits of the business between the purveyor of the tailings and the processor of the tailings. Our agreement has both lower and higher copper limits, which are separate for the fresh tailings and for the historic tailings. The limit for the fresh tailings is $4.80 per pound, and the limit for the historic tailings is $5.50 per pound. When we are outside of these ranges for two consecutive months, and there is also an indication that these prices will continue, we basically have to do one thing and one thing only, and that is to discuss the continuation of the royalty scale. It is a sliding scale. The higher the copper price, the higher the royalty factor with El Teniente. It is not a full renegotiation of anything else other than the royalty scale. We expect that, should these conditions arise. In fact, we're almost completing October, and October is the first time in history where we've seen an average LME copper price over $4.80. If this condition were to continue in November, then starting in December, but not before then, we have to discuss with El Teniente the continuation of the royalty factor only. I hope that answers your question. Yes. Thank you. Just once again, I'm sure I speak for everyone on Jawbalder. There are no further questions at this time. I will now turn the call over to Aurora Davidson for closing remarks. Please continue. Thank you. Thank you for attending today's call. The recording and the script will be available on the Amerigo website in the next few days. This is our last earnings call of the year, so we wish you all the best as we wrap up 2025 and look forward to our next earnings call in February of 2026. Please visit our website regularly for updates. Feel free to contact us with any questions or convenience. Graham, Carmen, and myself, we're always there on the other side of the email or the phone to answer any questions. Thank you for your continued interest in Amerigo. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.