Hello, and thank you for standing by. Welcome to the BEP third quarter 2022 results conference call and webcast. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. After the speaker presentation, there will be a question-and-answer session. To ask a question during the session, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. It is now my pleasure to introduce CEO Connor Teskey. Thank you, operator. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us on our third quarter 2022 conference call. Before we begin, we would like to remind you that a copy of our news release, investor supplement, and letter to unit holders can be found on our website. We also want to remind you that we may make forward-looking statements on this call. These statements are subject to known and unknown risks, and future results may differ materially. For more information, you are encouraged to review our regulatory filings available on SEDAR, EDGAR, and on our website. On today's call, we will provide an update on the business and some of our recent growth initiatives. Esper Nemi, a Vice President in our investments team in North America, will discuss the growth of our renewables development business in the United States. I will then provide an overview of our recently announced acquisition of Westinghouse, and Wyatt will finish off the call discussing our operating results and financial position. Following our remarks, we look forward to taking your questions. We had a great quarter, demonstrating both through our strong financial results and the execution of several large-scale growth initiatives. We generated Funds from Operations of $243 million or $0.38 per unit, a 15% increase from the same period last year, as well as we advanced our key commercial priorities and development activities. We continue to believe that our business is uniquely positioned, providing investors with one of the most attractive value propositions in the sector. We feel this way for a number of reasons. First, our business is supported by a highly diversified global platform of clean energy assets, providing deep operating knowledge and visibility and the flexibility to deliver decarbonization solutions for our customers around the world. Second, our cash flows are contracted, long-term, and inflation-linked, meaning we will remain resilient throughout all economic environments. Third, our robust liquidity, strong balance sheet, and access to deep and varied sources of capital provide us the ability to execute on some of the largest and most attractive decarbonization investment opportunities. Lastly, we have a differentiated growth capability with over a hundred dedicated investment professionals around the world looking to deploy capital at attractive risk-adjusted returns while delivering on our 12%-15% return target. In this regard, we had a record quarter as we closed or secured investments of up to $6 billion of capital or $1.5 billion net to Brookfield Renewable across various transactions and regions. This includes the continued growth of our leading U.S. renewables development business, for which we will turn the call over to Esper to discuss. Thank you, Connor, and good morning, everyone. As Connor mentioned, our U.S. business continues to see significant growth. Following the close of our recently announced acquisitions, our development pipeline in the country will stand at over 60,000 MW and is well diversified across wind, utility-scale solar, distributed generation, and energy storage. The significant pipeline, alongside our existing scale operating business, means that we are owners and operators of one of the largest diversified clean power businesses in the country. Recently, we announced the acquisition of Scout Clean Energy and Standard Solar, both of which will be highly complementary to our existing business. Scout Clean Energy is one of the largest utility-scale, fully integrated renewable development platforms in the U.S. across wind, solar, and storage. We'll purchase the business for $1 billion, with the potential to invest an additional $350 million to support the business's development activities. In aggregate, this is $270 million net to Brookfield Renewable. Scout Clean Energy has a sizable existing portfolio of over 800 MW of operating wind assets and an attractive pipeline of over 22,000 MW of wind, solar, and storage projects across 24 states. This includes almost 2,500 MW of under-construction and advanced-stage projects with high visibility for commercialization and nearly 5,000 additional megawatts that have valuable interconnection queue positions. There's a strong management team in place with significant renewable power experience and a proven track record of successfully developing and financing over 20 GW of clean energy assets. This team will be a great complement to our capabilities and will benefit significantly from being a part of our business, especially our commercial and procurement capabilities. Standard Solar is a leading integrated distributed generation developer in the U.S. We announced the signing of this investment last quarter, and we have now closed the acquisition for consideration of $500 million, with the potential to invest an additional $160 million to support the business's growth initiatives, for $140 million in total net to Brookfield Renewable. Standard Solar is the market-leading owner and operator of commercial and community distributed solar with end-to-end development capabilities and a strong track record of delivering high-quality assets. The business has approximately 500 MW of operating and under construction contracted assets and an almost 2,000 MW identified pipeline. There's an experienced management team in place with a proven ability to execute on significant growth opportunities across several high-value solar markets in the U.S. that are highly complementary to our existing business. Finally, it is important to emphasize that when we underwrote these investments as well as Urban Grid, our utility-scale solar development platform that we acquired in the first quarter, we did not factor in the impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act. However, with the Inflation Reduction Act firmly enacted, it will provide meaningful upside to our sector and in particular, these development platforms. These investments will benefit from the extension of tax credits for wind and solar projects, as well as the expansion of tax credits to include storage, which should meaningfully accelerate and increase the build-out of the high-quality development pipelines within these businesses. Thank you for your time today. With that, I'll turn the call back over to Connor to discuss our investment in Westinghouse. Thanks, Esper. Any credible net zero plan must include a meaningful and growing amount of nuclear power generation. Not only that, the same industry tailwinds of decarbonization, electrification, and energy security are a benefit to nuclear power generation the same way that they are to wind, solar, and hydro. Last month, we reached a definitive agreement to acquire Westinghouse alongside our strategic partner, Cameco, one of the largest global suppliers of uranium fuel for nuclear power generation. Westinghouse is a global leader in providing critical products and services to the nuclear power industry. The transaction represents a very attractive risk-adjusted return proposition as the business is underpinned by highly durable cash flows, with approximately 85% of revenues coming from long-term inflation-linked contracted or highly recurring services, and a business that comes with nearly a 100% customer retention rate. Westinghouse acts as a service provider, and therefore it does not take on any commodity, construction or significant fixed price contract risk, nor does it have any exposure to nuclear liabilities as it operates in countries where those liabilities for nuclear accidents lies with the plant operators. The total equity invested for the transaction will be approximately $4.5 billion or $750 million net to Brookfield Renewable, where we, along with our institutional partners, will own 51% of the company and Cameco will own the remaining 49%. Our investment in Westinghouse is an attractive entry point into nuclear power generation, which we believe, along with hydro, to be one of the key technologies facilitating the rapid build-out of intermittent renewables. Wind and solar must be complemented by clean, dispatchable baseload power generation. As the owner of one of the largest hydro businesses globally, we have visibility to the increasing value of clean, reliable and economic sources of power to the grid. Westinghouse is exceedingly well-positioned to benefit from these secular trends. It is the leading original equipment manufacturer and scale provider of mission-critical technologies, products and services to half the global nuclear power generation fleet. Westinghouse serves as a key enabler of the energy transition around the world, providing products and services essential to both the continued operation and growth of the global nuclear fleet. Given the need for clean, dispatchable energy, as well as its compelling economic proposition, we believe that nuclear power is posed for significant growth. As long as nuclear power exists, Westinghouse will perform well. Westinghouse is well-positioned to benefit from the significant volume of plant extensions that have been announced, 50 GW and growing, and the more than 60 GW of new build reactors expected between 2020 and 2040 across more than 20 countries around the world. Recently, the Polish government announced that it had chosen Westinghouse to support a first project of three units with an option for another three using Westinghouse's AP1000 nuclear reactor technology. This was a key step towards the country achieving its decarbonization targets and greater energy independence. Lastly, there are multi-decade growth opportunities in the rollout of next-generation advanced nuclear technology, such as Westinghouse's eVinci microreactor technology, which can play a growing role in an increasingly decentralized and decarbonized energy system. With that, we will turn the call over to Wyatt to discuss our operating results and financial position. Thank you, Connor. As mentioned in earlier remarks, we had strong results in the quarter as our operations benefited from strong global power prices and continued growth both through development and acquisitions. Our balance sheet is in excellent shape with our credit rating recently affirmed at BBB+ with a stable outlook. We remain resilient to the rising interest rates globally with over 90% of our borrowings being project-level, non-recourse debt with an average remaining term of 12 years, no material near-term maturities, and only 3% exposure to floating rate debt. In increasingly volatile markets, our access to diverse pools of capital becomes even more differentiated. We have over $3.5 billion of available liquidity, giving us significant financial flexibility during periods of capital scarcity. During the quarter, we secured over $3.7 billion of non-recourse financings across the business that will close this year, resulting in over $400 million in upfront financing proceeds to us. As both Connor and Esper illustrated, we had an impressive quarter for growth and are confident we can maintain this pace of deployment going forward. Importantly, we are very well-positioned to fund this growth. As I mentioned, we have access to deep and varied sources of capital, which is increasingly valuable in the current market. A significant portion of our recent growth is already funded or is structured to have capital deployed over a prolonged period and in almost all cases at our option. Further, we intend to more actively take advantage of the strong bids we are seeing for a number of our mature assets where we have successfully executed our business plans. Recycling proceeds from mature assets into new growth opportunities remains one of the most value-accretive levers within our business. We also have initiated capital recycling activities that, in total, when closed, expect to generate approximately $830 million of total proceeds. We have also launched numerous sales processes for some of our mature assets in select markets, which are garnering significant interest at very attractive valuations, providing significant visibility to our capital recycling program for the coming quarters. In closing, we believe the future opportunities for investing in clean power and the energy transition will be even greater than they are today. Our scale, track record, and global capabilities position us as a partner of choice in decarbonization. On behalf of the board and management, we thank all our unitholders and shareholders for their ongoing support. That concludes our formal remarks for today's call. Thank you for joining us this morning. With that, I'll pass it back to our operator for questions. Thank you. As a reminder, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one on your telephone. Once again, to ask a question, you will need to press star one one. Our first question comes from the line of Robert Hope with Scotiabank. Good morning, everyone. Just the first question's on the development pipeline. You've been quite successful year-to-date on, you know, expanding that pipeline. However, with 10,000 MW potentially entering service here in the next couple of years, you know, that could meaningfully draw down that pipeline. You know, it does seem like there's a little bit of a gold rush for development companies right now. How do you envision, you know, longer term replacing this development pipeline? Thanks, Robert. Maybe a couple comments there. First and foremost, it's absolutely true that over the past 12 months, we've made a number of acquisitions of businesses that come with large in-place development pipelines, and that has dramatically increased our business' total development capacity to approximately 100,000 MW. What's important to recognize is when we buy those businesses, we're not buying static operations. They come with management teams that have incredible greenfield development capabilities, such that they can continue to organically grow those development pipelines themselves. I would perhaps take a slightly different view. I would expect that while we do intend to build well north of 10 GW of that pipeline out over the next three years, I would expect three years from now, when we look to the next three years, we'll be looking to build far more than 10 GW out in that period as well. We expect to see that pipeline continue to be pulled forward and continue to grow given the development capabilities we have within our business. No doubt, some of the support that comes from policies such as the IRA are significantly going to help that dynamic. The other comment I would make is just around our success, particularly in the United States, around acquiring development platforms. If you go back 12-18 months, there were a lot of development businesses sold in the United States. Candidly, we looked at almost all of them. We put a lot of work into them, and we bid at what we thought were attractive returns, and we weren't very competitive in 2021. Then 2022, we've used the same investment discipline, and we've been successful on bidding on a number of those acquisitions. I do think that demonstrates perhaps what is happening in the market, where Less sophisticated investors that maybe don't have the access to capital that we do in more uncertain markets, and maybe investors that aren't as quite well-positioned to manage through things like supply chain disruptions or bring power marketing capabilities to bear, haven't had the ability to acquire for value in 2022 like we have. Appreciate that. Thank you. Maybe the second question is just on your other growth initiatives. It does appear like the net is being cast a little bit wider into the transition, you know, arena. That being said, it looks like a disciplined manner. When you're evaluating these new opportunities, Westinghouse looked like, you know, what we'll characterize as long-duration cash flows. Maybe the next phase of growth, the pure-play recycling business, what are kind of the key tenets of risk-return contract duration and asset investment are you looking for? Rob, great question, and you're absolutely right. Part of the reason why we love Westinghouse is it's a large-scale operating business directly tied to the clean energy transition that if you look at the underlying cash flows, they actually have a lot of parallels to the wind and solar and hydro businesses that we've been investing in for decades. You're also correct that a smaller but growing part of our business is more of the energy transition and sustainable solution initiatives. What we look for when we expand into those asset classes are really three things. One, there needs to be a clear decarbonization objective, and the acquisition needs to be motivated by the ability to offer something to our customers that we don't offer them today. Secondly, the approach we've taken when investing in those businesses so far is to make very small initial upfront investments that have a strong level of downside protection, but allow us to, one, partner with a leader in the space, and two, put us in the priority position to invest more capital at our discretion if those asset classes and sustainable solutions grow in the future. Whether it's the recycling business or some of the carbon capture investments we've made, these are small downside-protected upfront investments where we have the right to deploy more capital if we see opportunities to build out those sustainable solutions when they're backed by long-term contracts, the same way we approach wind and solar. The last point I would make is while we have made a number of investments in this space in recent quarters, it is important to recognize that we do still feel the single largest growth opportunity for our business is in the build-out and acquisition of traditional renewable power asset classes. That's really been demonstrated by the activity we've seen in the United States over the last 12 months. Thank you. Appreciate that. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Sean Stewart with TD Securities. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Want to follow up on the accelerating capital recycling initiatives of mature assets to bolster the liquidity position and crystallize returns. Can you give us additional comments on any focus with respect to technology or region, what you're concentrating on, where you see the better relative opportunities right now? Certainly. Perhaps the simplest answer is we see the greatest opportunity largely in the sale of wind and solar assets. We certainly have a very rapidly growing platform, and whether it's through M&A or through organic development, we're constantly adding more of those assets to our platform, which provides us tremendous flexibility to recycle those assets where we've executed our business plan and they're more mature within our portfolio. The other characterization we would make is when we look at some of the assets that we're receiving inbounds or interest for that are prime candidates for capital recycling, there is a nice mix right now of mature operating assets, but we're also getting interest in portfolios that include some of our development pipeline or under construction assets. The point that we would reemphasize is whether we're selling an operating asset or selling a portfolio that still has some development and organic growth runway, we're only gonna look to sell assets where we've completed our business plan and the initial operating objectives that we set out to do when we acquired the business. Perhaps a last comment, we do expect to be recycling capital on a global basis in the near term. We largely see most of the opportunities within the Americas, and we would expect some of our capital recycling to be focused there in the next, call it, six to nine months, but we're also seeing opportunities in other parts of the world. Okay. Thanks for that, Connor. On the M&A opportunity set, you focused more recently on private opportunities. Can you give any updated broader thoughts on valuation trends for private opportunities versus public opportunities, given the extent of volatility in the latter group? Any particular focus that you're concentrating on? Definitely. Great question. No doubt, the opportunity set in the public market space for us around potential M&A is higher today than it was six months ago, or it was 12 months ago. We're actively monitoring that space. The point you've highlighted also illustrates another dynamic that we're seeing, which is in recent quarters, we've acquired a number of platforms for value that had a development focus where we thought we could really enhance growth and drive value with our procurement capabilities and our power marketing capabilities. That's led to a more recent focus on development. I think what we're seeing, given the more uncertain and slightly more volatile public markets and capital markets, is we are seeing more opportunities to buy operating assets in the current environment than perhaps we've seen in the last six or nine months. That's just a very natural ebb and flow of our business. It would be great to see more opportunities in that space going forward. That's useful context. Thanks very much, Connor. That's all I have. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Rupert Merer with National Bank. Hey, good morning, everyone. On the development activity, you're looking to build out 10 GW over the next three years. Can you comment on how the supply chain interconnection queues and offtakes are evolving to support those growth targets? Certainly. Great question, Rupert, and this is something that's been topical for a number of quarters now. We will remain consistent. Managing through supply chain disruptions, we are not immune to that. It is something that has impacted the entire industry. The way we would classify it for our business is it is something we have had to dedicate increased resources and increased focus to manage through, but we feel we've managed through it very successfully. Any disruptions have not had a material impact on our business, either in terms of CapEx costs or in terms of the timeline on delivering projects. We're quite proud to state that we've not walked away from any projects during this period of supply chain disruptions. However, perhaps this quarter, there is a more positive spin that we are beginning to see a light at the end of the tunnel around the ability to more easily procure CapEx in many markets around the world. There is more capacity coming online. Some of the logistical issues around shipping those components around the world do appear to be easing, and therefore we feel we've done a great job managing up to this point. We do expect 2023 to be better than 2022, and that's a nice upside for our business. Another perhaps short answer to your question, we don't see supply chain disruptions as a risk to delivery on that, you know, 10,000+ MW that we expect to bring online. With the competitive environment, do you see adequate access to interconnection and a fair price to offtakes as well? It's a great question, and we're glad you asked it. Interconnection is something that we feel, and interconnection queue position is something that we feel has been dramatically undervalued within our sector for years. When we make investments, particularly on the development side, we always take into account where are those development projects in terms of their life cycle. Do they have land secured? Do they have permits secured? And do they have interconnection grid secured? This is something we've taken into account whenever we've made an investment in development platforms. I'll actually give an example from earlier this year, Urban Grid. We bought this business and we cleared the market, and we were thrilled to make that acquisition. One of the underappreciated benefits of that business is it had a very strong interconnection queue position in the high-value market of PJM. And already in our early stages of ownership of that business, we've seen the ability to capitalize on that highly valuable and highly scarce, interconnection position. To answer your question, yes, we think interconnection is a very important component of the value of a development project, and it's something that's increasingly coming into focus across our industry today. We feel quite proud that it's something we've been focused on for a number of years now across all the development acquisitions we've made. Great. Thanks, Connor. I'll leave it there. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of David Quezada with Raymond James. Thanks. Morning, everyone. My first question maybe just a kind of a broader question around your renewable deployment strategy in Europe. I think it was a couple of quarters ago, you talked about, you know, accelerating investment in places like Germany. Just curious, what you've seen recently in terms of, you know, advancement of projects there and momentum you're seeing in that market today. Certainly. One dynamic we are seeing in Europe, and this will come as a shock to no one, is the increased importance and heightened focus on energy security. While right now, the delivery of gas dominates a lot of the headlines as it pertains to European power markets, something that is happening in a very large way is European regions and European authorities are working very hard to accelerate the permitting across Europe to allow for the more rapid build-out of renewables. Renewables really are the long-term solution to low-cost energy and energy security and net zero, which is probably the three highest priorities in Europe right now. Where we're seeing that most actively across three of our European businesses is in Sunovis, our solar developer in Germany, where we've accelerated the build-out of our development pipeline. Within X-Elio, which is a large global solar development platform with a significant presence in Europe that is seeing an acceleration of its build-out in Spain. Also within Polenergia that is pulling forward some of its wind and solar build-out in the country. We're seeing it very much within our operating businesses, and we're taking that into account as we review new growth opportunities and M&A opportunities as well. Excellent. Thanks for that color, Connor. Appreciate it. Maybe just one more for me on the Westinghouse acquisition. I'm just curious what kind of timeline and I guess magnitude of opportunity you see with the microreactor technology, and if you have any thoughts around you know which jurisdictions would initially make sense for that technology. Certainly. One of the reasons we love Westinghouse is no matter where nuclear grows, Westinghouse is poised to benefit. If the growth comes from uprates or life extensions of existing power generation plants, Westinghouse is well-positioned to benefit from that. If the growth comes from new build-out of large-scale nuclear reactors, Westinghouse is exceedingly well-positioned to benefit from that as the supplier of engineering and products to those build-outs. Then more in the future, as we see more advanced stage nuclear technology focus on SMRs and microreactors, Westinghouse has the leading microreactor technology, and we view them as being in the pole position to capture that market as costs come down and as demand for that technology grows as well. I would highlight that we view that last bucket as being slightly deferred to the other two, maybe 3-5 years away, but that doesn't mean we aren't tremendously excited about it and excited about Westinghouse's pole position in that space. One parallel that I would draw is, as Westinghouse moves to more smaller scale reactors and potentially microreactors to service that growing demand, it really lends itself to a lot of the same capabilities that we have within our renewables business. Providing power plants that can be contracted directly to an end customer that needs to clean energy in a certain region around the world. It has many of the same decentralizations and customer-focused dynamics as our distributed generation business, which is obviously something where we've seen lots of upside and lots of growth in recent years. Excellent. Thanks for that, Connor. I'll turn it over. Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of William Griffin with UBS. All right, great. Thank you very much. Just my first question, touched on this earlier, but was hoping you could provide maybe a bit more color on the investment in the U.S. recycling business. You know, what made that an investment there attractive to Brookfield? And then maybe you could discuss the timing of that transaction, just given the recent sharp decline in recycled commodity values that we've seen. Certainly. Maybe just to take a step back on that investment in particular, why we like it is it has many similar dynamics to development of wind and solar. Obviously, there's a clear decarbonization angle, but really what the opportunity there is not dissimilar to when we buy a renewables developer. This business has an existing asset base, but a very large development pipeline of material recycling facilities that they have the potential to build out. Now, they will only build out those facilities if they can secure a long-term contract that really de-risks the construction and the long-term cash flows of those assets once we build them out. Once again, a very direct parallel to the investment profile that we're familiar with. Secondly, the point that we would reiterate is simply around our ability to increasingly serve our customers' decarbonization needs. One thing that we are very happy with is the value proposition we have in the United States right now. That quite frankly, for our customers, we think is tough to match. Whether it's on green energy, now we can provide green power across any asset type, wind, solar, hydro, or DG in any region. If it's a customer that has emissions that are tough to abate that want to look to reduce emissions through the use of carbon capture, we can give them that. If it's a customer that has needs for raw materials and they wanna focus on recycled materials as opposed to virgin materials, we now have an avenue to do that as well. As we think about these new asset classes, it's really about servicing our customers while executing on the same risk-adjusted return and investment profile that's been very familiar to our business for a number of years. Appreciate that. Just last one for me. I mean, could you speak, you know, broadly to what you're seeing in terms of asset prices for traditional operating renewable energy projects? Have valuations started to come down, just to reflect the higher rate environment that we're in? We'll provide a very balanced answer on this. Valuations have yet to come down for private market transactions, but let's be clear, we fully expect that they will at some point. You know, rates can't continue to rise and valuations stay, you know, cemented where they've been for the last couple of years. We're certainly taking that into account. To date, you know, there's been a number of very recent high-profile transactions in the renewable space, and I think it would be very tough to make an argument that valuations have come down yet. The other point that we would highlight is when we think of where we buy or build versus where we think we can sell, that development margin or that operating improvement margin, we haven't seen that shrink. Even if power or interest rates cause, let's say, the price of long-term contracted operating assets decline a little bit, maybe returns going up a little bit, we are seeing development returns go up a proportionate amount as well. We're still capturing the same amount of development margin or improvement margin, which means capital recycling continues to be a very value-accretive way to grow our business. All right. Appreciate you taking my questions. Thanks very much. Thank you. Now I'm showing no further questions. With that, I'll hand the call back over to CEO Connor Teskey for any closing remarks. Great. Well, thank you everyone for dialing into today's call. We, as always, appreciate your interest and support of Brookfield Renewable, and we look forward to updating you with our year-end results after the end of Q4. Have a great day. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's conference call. Thank you for participating, and you may now disconnect.