Welcome to the Emera Q2 2022 analyst call. At this time, all lines are in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, we will conduct a question-and-answer session. If at any time during the call you require immediate assistance, please press star zero for the operator. This call is being recorded on Wednesday, August tenth, 2022. I would now like to turn the call over to Dave Bezanson. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you, Michelle, and thank you all for joining us this morning for Emera's Q2 2022 conference call and live webcast. Emera's second quarter earnings release was distributed this morning via Newswire, and the financial statements, management's discussion and analysis, and the presentation being referenced on this call are available on our website at emera.com. Joining me for this morning's call are Scott Balfour, Emera's President and Chief Executive Officer, Greg Blunden, Emera's Chief Financial Officer, and other members of Emera's management team. This morning's discussion will include forward-looking information which is subject to the cautionary statement contained in the supporting slide. Today's discussion and presentation will also include references to non-GAAP financial measures. Please refer to the appendix for definitional information and reconciliations of historical non-GAAP measures to the closest GAAP financial measure. Now I will turn things over to Scott. Thank you, Dave, and good morning, everyone. This morning, we released our second quarter results, and I'm pleased to share that we continue to deliver steady, predictable earnings and cash flow growth. Our second quarter adjusted earnings per share increased 9% to CAD 0.59 compared to CAD 0.54 in the second quarter of last year. Operating cash flow is also up 9% over last year. For the year to date, adjusted earnings per share increased CAD 0.02 to CAD 1.51 compared to CAD 1.49 last year. Similar to what we saw in both the second and third quarter last year, our reported earnings this quarter were impacted by mark-to-market losses at Emera Energy. Greg will walk you through the mechanics of these losses and our financial results in a few moments. Our regulated utilities delivered an 18% increase in adjusted earnings per share this quarter and 12% year to date, largely driven by strong results at Tampa Electric. Economic growth in Florida continues to drive meaningful customer growth at our utilities. Over 2% at Tampa Electric and almost 5% at Peoples Gas year-over-year. Customer growth is one factor that helps to offset the rate requirements to finance the major investments being made to reduce the carbon intensity of the generation mix and to continue to improve the reliability of the system. In the first half of 2022, we've deployed over CAD 1.1 billion in capital, and we're on track to deliver almost CAD 3 billion in capital investment this year. We're working to complete the Big Bend modernization and install an additional 200 MW of solar in Florida at Tampa Electric by the end of this year. These projects are transforming the grid in Florida and both are progressing well. In Nova Scotia, we are continuing to advance the Eastern Clean Energy Initiative, including the Atlantic Loop, which would enable the addition of more renewable energy onto the grid, the closure of coal-fired power plants, and improve grid reliability and resiliency. The recently announced investment in clean energy projects here in Nova Scotia by the Government of Canada is a significant step in Nova Scotia's transformational energy journey, facilitating more wind energy in the province and a grid-scale battery project that will be among the largest battery storage projects in North America. In the Caribbean, we recently commissioned the Clean Energy Bridge, which will deliver roughly 27% of the energy needed on the island of Barbados. By replacing older infrastructure, this facility will reduce emissions while improving grid resiliency and reliability for customers. At Peoples Gas, we expect to have two renewable natural gas facilities online by the end of the year. Peoples Gas is the largest natural gas distribution utility in Florida and the first to deliver RNG in the state. When complete, these two projects will not only contribute to a cleaner energy future, they will deliver enough energy to fuel almost 10,000 homes. This is incredible progress on our ambitious capital plan, especially as we continue to navigate supply challenges and proactively work to mitigate inflationary impacts on both our capital plan and in our business more broadly. So far, the effects of supply chain delays and inflation in our capital spend has not resulted in any material changes to our capital plan. We will share our 2023 through 2025 capital plan during our Q3 earnings call. In June, we released our sixth annual sustainability report. The report highlights Emera's strategy in action and demonstrates the progress we are making towards a cleaner energy future and the role we are playing in building safer, more diverse, and inclusive teams and communities. This year's report includes a detailed climate strategy that provides an update on our progress toward our climate goals and the work underway across the business to lead a responsible and just energy transition that reduces environmental impacts while balancing investments in reliability and the impacts to customers, employees, and the communities where we operate. Our clean energy journey began here in Nova Scotia, where we've led one of the most ambitious transitions to cleaner energy in Canada. We currently have over 600 MW of wind generation on the system at Nova Scotia Power, and our investment in the Maritime Link facilitates the transmission of more than 500 MW of clean hydro energy from Newfoundland and Labrador. In 2021, Nova Scotia Power tripled the amount of renewable energy it delivers to customers and reduced their coal usage by 43% compared to 2005 levels. Later this month, we'll achieve another milestone in our decarbonization journey by taking Lingan Unit Two, a 148-MW coal unit here in the province, out of regular service. In Florida, the investment in the Big Bend modernization has allowed us to retire one coal-fired unit and convert another to high-efficiency natural gas. This investment and our ongoing solar investments will allow us to retire another coal unit in 2023, two decades ahead of its scheduled retirement. Since 2000, we've reduced our use of coal in Tampa by 90%. Closing coal units is critical to meeting government targets and community and customer expectations. Doing so in the most cost-effective way without putting system resiliency or reliability at risk for our customers is our mission and a requirement of our regulators. Ensuring these closures are done in a just and balanced way is core to our culture. We understand the impact to employees who work in these plants and to the communities where the plants are located. We continue to work closely with government employees, unions, and community groups to ensure a just transition, one that is anchored in transparency and collaboration. We're proud of our progress to date. Global demand for carbon reduction continues and policymakers target even faster timelines, it's important to recognize the significant and challenging work ahead. As I mentioned earlier, the recent funding announcement from the government of Canada is an important milestone, and it supports our commitment to minimizing the cost impacts of the energy transition on our customers. While wind and batteries are an important part of the solution, the reality is that these investments alone are not enough to allow us to close the remaining coal plants in Nova Scotia or to achieve Nova Scotia's 80% renewable energy target by 2030. That's why we continue to advance the Atlantic Loop project. We believe this important transmission infrastructure project will play a critical role in a more integrated clean energy grid in Nova Scotia and is instrumental in achieving both the federal and provincial government's ambitious climate goals. We continue to work with all stakeholders to advance this project and are cautiously optimistic on the progress and recent momentum. With 2030 quickly approaching, we hope to have more to share on this project later this year. It continues to be busy on the regulatory front as well, with rate cases ongoing in the U.S., Canada, and the Caribbean. The team at New Mexico Gas recently filed an unopposed settlement agreement with the regulator which, if approved, will provide $19 million in new rates effective January 1, 2023. This will support our continued investment in pipeline integrity and reliability projects in the state. Rate cases in Nova Scotia and Barbados are ongoing, with hearings scheduled to begin in the coming months. We expect to have resolution on these outstanding rate applications by the end of this year. It's an exciting yet challenging time in the energy sector. Our team continues to navigate complex economic, political, and regulatory environments, and our proven strategy continues to deliver for customers, communities, and investors. With that, I'll turn it over to Greg to take you through our financial results. Greg? Thank you, Scott, and thank you all for joining us this morning. Earlier today, we reported second-quarter adjusted earnings of CAD 156 million and adjusted earnings per share of CAD 0.59 compared to CAD 137 million and CAD 0.54 in Q2 of 2021. Year-to-date adjusted earnings were CAD 398 million and adjusted earnings per share was CAD 1.51 compared to CAD 380 million and CAD 1.49 for the same period in 2021. Our regulated portfolio continued to be the driver of strong second-quarter results. Contributions from our regulated utilities increased CAD 44 million over Q2 2021 or CAD 0.14 of adjusted EPS. This was partially offset by higher corporate costs, lower contributions from Emera Energy, and a higher share count. Our adjusted earnings measures exclude mark-to-market adjustments. Emera Energy's Q2 mark-to-market loss had a material impact on reported earnings. Many of you will remember we had a similar situation several times before, including in the second and third quarter of last year. I'm going to take a minute to give you a refresher what's going on here. Emera Energy has contracts with utilities, producers, and other customers to buy or sell gas for a term that comes with access to the customer's transmission capacity. Mark-to-market arises on the price differential between the market price where the gas is sourced and where it is sold, which is fully offset by the value of the corresponding gas transportation asset. Because the gas is mark-to-market at each reporting period and the transportation asset is not, that results in some net mark-to-market gains or losses recorded in income, with all such gains or losses netting to zero by the end of the contract term. As always, it is important to emphasize that these situations have no actual economic market exposure because regardless of the difference in the value of the gas between the receipt and delivery points, Emera Energy has a transportation capacity that enables it to move the gas to the point at which it is priced. Operating cash flow continued to grow, increasing CAD 62 million year to date or 9% compared to 2021. The increase was primarily due to the 2021 gas cost deferral at New Mexico Gas from Winter Storm Uri and new base rates at Tampa Electric. Like many others, fuel cost is the area across our business where we're seeing the most significant inflationary impact driven by global macroeconomic conditions. As a result, the cash flow increases from new base rates at Tampa Electric and growth in our businesses are partially offset by higher fuel underrecoveries, primarily at Tampa Electric and Nova Scotia Power. Absent the fuel underrecoveries this year, we would have seen a 41% increase in operating cash flow driven by the growth in our regulated utilities. As I've mentioned on previous calls, we have regulatory mechanisms at all of our utilities to recover prudently incurred fuel costs from customers. However, we are mindful of the impact the sustained high pricing is having on customer bills. In addition to the robust efforts of our teams to mitigate the cost impacts from higher market costs, we are also committed to working constructively with our regulators and customer groups to best manage the recovery of these unexpectedly higher costs in as reasonable a way as possible for our customers. Tampa Electric continued to deliver strong results with growth of $24 million in earnings or 24% over Q2 of 2021, driven by new base rates that went into effect January first, favorable weather and continued customer growth. Continued economic recovery in the Caribbean and the recognition of one-time proceeds at Emera Caribbean Inc. increased contributions from our Caribbean utilities by $6 million quarter-over-quarter. Earnings from our gas and infrastructure segment increased $5 million for the quarter, primarily driven by increased earnings arising from a gas transmission lease contract with a Florida utility operator that commenced on January first. Peoples Gas also continued to benefit from strong economic conditions in Florida, driving growth in its customer base, as well as the recognition of a $5 million amortization reversal, partially offset by higher operating costs reflecting the growth of the underlying business. The weakening Canadian dollar increased earnings from our US operations by 7 million CAD for the quarter. Corporate costs increased 19 million CAD this quarter, largely driven by gains on foreign exchange hedges recognized in 2021 that did not reoccur this year, higher preferred share dividends, and the timing of share-based compensation expense and related hedges. Earnings from our Canadian utilities decreased modestly during the quarter, primarily due to slightly lower contributions from our transmission investments. Similar to previous quarters, the growth in earnings were partially offset by a higher share count. Year to date, adjusted earnings per share increased CAD 0.02 to CAD 1.51. Contribution from our regulated portfolio increased adjusted earnings per share by CAD 0.26, partially offset by lower contributions from Emera Energy, higher corporate costs and a higher share count. Earnings from Tampa Electric increased $47 million- $214 million or 28% year-over-year from $167 million in 2021, with the drivers for growth consistent with the quarterly results discussed a moment ago. Year-to-date contributions from our Canadian utilities increased CAD 5 million compared to 2021, primarily due to the mild winter we experienced in Nova Scotia in the first quarter of last year. This year's results benefited from colder weather, which drove higher sales volumes in Q1, partially offset by higher storm costs and lower contributions from equity investments. Corporate costs increased CAD 36 million, primarily driven by the timing of share-based compensation expense and related hedges, higher preferred share dividends, and a gain on foreign exchange hedges recognized in Q2 of 2021. Year-to-date, Emera Energy delivered CAD 21 million of adjusted earnings. Although this represents a CAD 21 million decrease from 2021, our prior year's results benefited from the event-driven volatility created by Winter Storm Uri. Finally, higher share count decreased adjusted earnings per share by CAD 0.05 year-over-year. With interest rates rising in both Canada and the United States, I wanted to take a moment to walk you through the impacts we are seeing across our business, including our refinancing needs. Like many of our peers, we took advantage of the yield curve over the last number of years. Heading into this year, the average term of our long-term debt portfolio was almost 15 years, and our refinancing needs are modest over the next 3 years. Approximately 90% of our long-term debt portfolio matures beyond 2024 and 85% beyond 2026. The composition of our debt portfolio also positions us well to withstand a rising interest rate environment. Variable rate debt represents less than 15% of our total debt portfolio, and less than 7% of that is at the holding company level. This quarter, we completed a $600 million issuance of senior notes at Tampa Electric to address our only maturity in 2022, and we issued $400 million term loans at both Nova Scotia Power and Emera. Proceeds from these issuances will be used for general corporate purposes and to put additional liquidity in place to address the impacts of the volatile commodity markets. Finally, as you may recall, the Tampa Electric settlement included a mechanism that would increase the ROE at Tampa Electric by 25 basis points and allow for an additional $10 million in base revenues if in any continuous six-month period, the average 30-year Treasury yields increased by more than 50 points above the rate on the date of the settlement. This rate was achieved during the quarter, and on July 1, Tampa Electric filed with the regulator for approval. We expect a decision from the regulator later this month, and the new midpoint ROE will be 10.2% with a range of 9.25%-11.25%. I'm pleased to report that in the last two months, all three of the rating agencies have reaffirmed their ratings and stable outlooks for Emera. We remain committed to maintaining our investment-grade credit ratings and will continue to proactively engage with the rating agencies. Looking forward to the second half of this year, we are well-positioned to continue delivering strong cash flow growth from operations, driving improved credit metrics. Although we expect there may be some timing delays in cash flow recovery associated with the fuel under recoveries we are experiencing at our electric utilities. We remain confident that our highly regulated, diversified portfolio is well-positioned to capitalize on the investment opportunities we see in front of us and to continue to provide growth in earnings, dividends, and cash flow over the long term. Thank you, Greg. This concludes the presentation, and we would now like to open the call for questions from analysts. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question-and-answer session. Should you have a question, please press star followed by the one on your touch-tone phone. You will hear a three-tone prompt acknowledging your request, and your questions will be polled in the order they are received. Should you wish to decline from the polling process, please press star followed by the two. If you are using a speakerphone, please lift the handset before pressing any key. One moment please for your first question. The first question comes from Linda Ezergailis of TD Securities. Please go ahead. Thank you. I'm wondering if you could help us understand your capital plan that you're going to be releasing next quarter, recognizing that you're still iterating and fine-tuning it. I'm wondering if you know inflation and supply chain considerations might prompt some either increases or deferrals in existing projects and how you are maybe even building in contingencies into some of your plans in the outer years. Hi, Linda. It's Greg. Good morning. As Scott mentioned, what we're seeing at least to date is not a material change in our current year capital plans. Obviously, we're seeing some inflationary pressures on some commodities, and at the same time, seeing some supply chain constraints that's possibly pushing some projects out. You know, I don't want to get too far ahead of what we're going to come out with in the fall, but I'd say directionally, we're not seeing any kind of material change on our overall expected spend over the next three years. Okay. Thank you. Just as a follow-up, as you look at volatility in fuel prices and, you know, all have differing views on how long inflationary pressures will prevail and the nature of them. You know, is that informing how you approach your regulatory filings and how you structure your rates and risk-sharing with customers? Can you comment on how you balance a few of those considerations? Yeah. Linda, this is Scott. I'd just say, you know, broadly, and I think this is true certainly for us, and I'm sure it's true for every utility in North America for sure. Today, you know, the real sensitivity that we've got is managing the cost impacts of the accelerating fuel price pass-through to the cost for customers. You know, we're working collaboratively with our regulators, with customer groups to manage those impacts as best we can, obviously, operationally mitigating the impacts with lots of examples of that, including, you know, the solar that we've got in Tampa is saving customers money because we're not needing to buy fuel. The Maritime Link is saving customers money because we're not needing to buy fuel at these higher prices. We're not immune to the impacts of these things. Really, it's about being engaged with our regulators, with our interveners and customer groups in trying to work through that and be as sensitive to that as we can. Yes, it's informing our thinking and our conversations with customers and regulators both. Thank you. Maybe just to provide additional context to some of those dynamics. You know, given that gas and electricity prices have gone up, are you seeing any impact at all on customer behavior and usage? Conversely, are you seeing maybe the relative competitive pricing of the cost of energy in your utilities shift compared to any customer alternatives that there might be in certain jurisdictions? It's a complicated question, Linda. I think, you know, I think that, you know, we're not seeing any direct correlation of change of behavior in terms of energy usage relative to change in price. Although that's, you know, that's in itself hard to determine because there's so many things, of course, that go into measuring customer usage. Of course, the biggest driver is weather as well as new customer connections. You heard me mention earlier that, you know, for example, in Florida, we continue to see growth in new customers at a significant pace. You know, we've also seen warmer weather again in Florida, just using that example. Within that, it's hard to correlate any direct relationship to the impact of changing rates. Sure, I mean, the higher fuel markets is creating You know, lots of effort on behalf of the teams in all of our jurisdictions continuing to try to optimize and minimize the cost of generation, both in the moment, but also in terms of generation planning. Obviously, as I made reference to before, for example, in Florida, again, you know, the value of that solar that we put in place is even higher now than what we expected it was because of course, we didn't expect fuel prices to be so high at the time that those cases were reviewed with the regulators and interveners. You know, that's always part of the work that gets done as part of the generation planning that both Tampa Electric and Nova Scotia Power does, as well as in Barbados and Bahamas. You know, it's more complicated in this environment because things are changing quickly, but the underlying process continues to be the same, and we continue to work very hard every day to mitigate the short-term and long-term cost impacts for customers. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Rob Hope, Scotiabank. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Maybe a first question just on the Atlantic Loop. You know, just the prepared remarks. It seems like this project is gaining a little bit of momentum with a, you know, a potential decision towards the end of the year. Can you just maybe give us a little bit more color on where we are in the process there and kind of, you know, what the eventual project could look like if it's changed at all? Yeah, Rob, it's Peter at Nova Scotia Power. Good to speak with you. I agree that we have seen a bit of an uptick in momentum. We share the federal government's goal of trying to get resolution to this by the end of this year. As we said before, though, it's a complex project with multiple stakeholders. You know, as I think Scott said in his comments that we're cautiously optimistic to getting there. I'd say that the meetings continue to happen in earnest with all stakeholders. Everybody is engaged. There's still a fair amount of work to do. I am hopeful that by the end of the year, we would have at least an idea of an agreement in principle between all parties that we can move forward with. All right. Appreciate that. Just want to go back on the increased fuel costs for, you know, the first half of the year. You know, as you talk to your customers and the regulators, you know, when looking at the under recovery of fuel so far this year, you know, when would you prefer to have that recovered by? You know, have you talked to the credit rating agencies about, you know, what your plan would be there? Yeah. Rob, it's Greg. Yeah, I mean, if we go based on past practice, and there certainly has been nothing through our discussions yet that any of the stakeholders, customer groups or, you know, commission staffs want to deviate from that. Generally, in Florida, fuel costs are trued up either in the year that the under recovery takes place or in the following 12 months. At this point in time, we wouldn't expect anything different at Tampa Electric. Nova Scotia Power has generally taken a more smoothing approach to it, although the maximum that we've ever done in Nova Scotia is recovered it over a 3-year period. It's important to note now that most of the under-recovery we've experienced to date this year is at Tampa Electric and not Nova Scotia Power because Nova Scotia Power has a hedging program in place which has helped us to mitigate the volatility to date. With respect to the credit rating agencies, you know, really, you know, with S&P and Moody's themselves, provided the fuel costs are generally going to be collected from customers in the following 12-month period, they normally treat it as an adjustment to working capital and therefore doesn't have an impact on your core credit metrics in the year that you had the under-recovery. Appreciate the color. Thank you. Thanks, Rob. Thank you. The next question comes from Maurice Choy, RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Thanks, good morning. Just a quick follow-up to the fuel cost under recovery. Just to say, as you first design your funding plan that you have today, this is obviously not something that you anticipated. With this continuing on and you recover over the next 12 or X amount of years, how does this factor into your funding plan, particularly recognizing that CapEx is also likely to go up? Yeah, Maurice, it's Greg. It really doesn't have any impact on our funding plan at all. To date, the most significant under-recovery is at Tampa Electric, and really that's a short-term issue probably over the next 12-15 months. That's really why we've done some things like we did the two-year bond issuance at Tampa Electric earlier, or I guess last quarter. We put in some term loans at both Nova Scotia Power and Emera just to provide us the flexibility. These are all one-year term loans just to make sure that we had the adequate liquidity in the event that we had some funding requirements for the next 12 months that we had financing that matched that. As a result, it wouldn't change our overall capital plans or funding plans for the next three years. That's great to know, and thanks for that. My second question, your thoughts on the implications of the Inflation Reduction Act, including the puts and takes from a tax perspective, as well as any stronger push towards renewables. Yeah, I'd say, Maurice, the team is still going through it. You know, quite frankly, the review of it probably raises as many questions as it provides answers. I'd say from a financial perspective, it doesn't seem to have much of an impact. You know, we'll be below the threshold for the alternative minimum tax, which is good. Obviously, anything from an ITC, PTC perspective on renewables is helpful, but it's not gonna have any kind of meaningful financial impact, either from an earnings or a cash flow for us in the next couple of years. Obviously, strategically, it's helpful. I mean, the more push and the more support in the United States for more renewables, some new technologies that will help achieve our long-term carbon reduction goals. You know, more support for electric vehicles, which will underpin some load growth. Those are all very, very positive for us. The direct financial implications seem to be pretty minor at this point in time. Perfect. Thank you very much. You're welcome. Thank you. The next question comes from Mark Jarvi of CIBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, everyone. I just wanna touch on the sort of base spending plan, but also the potential CAD 1 billion in incremental spend. Just the spending year to date, your expectations are still at the CAD 2.8 for the balance this year. Is there a possibility that you under-spend a little bit this year and there's some spend slippage the next year? Then on the CAD 1 billion that you talked about for a couple of quarters now of incremental spend, as we've moved through the year and Atlantic maybe takes a little longer to come to fruition, is the expectation that just rolls ahead one year in terms of that incremental CAD 1 billion of spend potential? Yeah, Mark, I think on the incremental opportunity on capital, you know, most of that was in the 2023/2024 year. Traditionally, we would expect as we roll forward our capital plan, which we'll share with you on the earnings call in Q3, that some of that will likely have been firmed up by then, and we're working through some of that. Obviously, as we do that, which is our traditional path, you know, there's always other projects that start to get identified. We'll capture all of that and share with you in Q3. In terms of this year, if I think I understood your question right, I mean, there's always, you know, a handful of projects that for whether it's scoping issues or supply chain constraints or allocation of resources, that there's always some movement between years, where projects can either be moved into a year or moved out into the next year. That continues, you know, that's normal course business for us. Wouldn't expect any of that to have a material impact on our forecasted capital spend for 2022. Okay. Thanks for that. Then, Greg, just coming back to that slide you provided on your debt and your profile. It's helpful. Just when you think of that 2023 maturity, 2024 maturity, just updated views, you know, relative to where the industry is on those. Is the idea here to just roll those over and take a bit of a hit on the effective interest rate? Anything else you can share in terms of how you handle next year's maturities, and 2024 as well? Yeah. I mean, we haven't concluded any of it, Mark. I mean, to be quite frank, where interest rates are today is not unexpected. Maybe they got here a little faster than maybe we anticipated, but our long-term financing plan had always assumed that interest rates were going to increase from where they were. I think the levels we were at, quite frankly, weren't sustainable. We're not planning to do any early refinancing of those at this point in time, and we'll continue to monitor the market and make decisions on those refinancings as we get closer to the maturity dates. Got it. Just coming back to the Inflation Reduction Act, you kind of said that it's not that meaningful, but I know it's a small component of business, but BlockEnergy, you know, I wonder whether or not there's anything from the IRA that's incrementally supportive and the commodity volatility is again, maybe tailwind for that business. Just updated views on BlockEnergy's potential. Yeah. I think, you know, it's directionally helpful, I think, Mark, for BlockEnergy, recognizing the technology and the battery components of that. Again, as Greg said, you know, we're really still working through the mechanics and details of the Act overall. You know, BlockEnergy itself continues to progress well. We've got 37 homes in service in the Florida region now with the version 2 product. We're working on a second utility pilot in the U.S., not related to Tampa Electric. We continue to advance the go-to-market version, the full go-to-market version 3 of this technology as well. We continue to be, you know, really encouraged, very excited, frankly, by this technology and the opportunity. It's still early days, and we're taking it a step at a time and proving it out and testing it. This idea of a utility-grade system that interconnects rooftop solar with residential storage, backup generation and a single connection to the AC grid. Pleased with our progress, but still it's early days. We'll be no doubt talking about it more in the quarters to come. Okay. Thanks, Scott. Thanks, Greg. Thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from Ben Pham of BMO. Please go ahead. Hi. Thanks. Good morning. Had a couple questions on Tampa Electric. When you think about the ROE application and approval in the near term, is that just for the regulator double-checking your numbers and making sure it fits the criteria? The $10 million pickup, is there gonna be some subjectivity around that ability to get that boost? Yeah. No, Ben, I think the way you characterize it is a fair representation. It's relatively a mechanical exercise we're going through right now. There's been no intervener opposition or nobody's filed to participate in the hearing. You know, they obviously, with a change in ROE and the impact of that, including the additional revenue requirement, the commission has a responsibility to make sure and confirm the math to support that, including whether or not the trigger was effectively hit. All of that's been filed with the regulator. We would not anticipate anything controversial coming out of that hearing. Okay. Great. When considering first half results and if like a couple of key drivers, how is Tampa Electric trending relative to your expectations? You put in your second half budget. I mean, is there ability to even benefit from this higher range that you could get approval for? Yeah. I'm not so sure necessarily that the higher range will have much of an impact on our balance of year results. Obviously, if we get an additional CAD 10 million of annualized incremental revenue and rates, and if that takes place, let's pick September one, we'd have some prorated amount of that in 2022. It has some modest positive impact, think low single-digit CAD millions spent on our clause-related recoveries. Things like the Storm Protection Plan that will, you know, start to collect revenues and earnings on that at the midpoint of the band as well. Maybe a slight bias upwards over the second half of the year, but we're pretty comfortable at this point in time that we'll be comfortably within the new range of ROE for the 2002 fiscal year. Okay. Perfect. Thank you. You're welcome. Thank you. The next question comes from Dariusz Lozny of Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, and thank you for taking my questions. Maybe just to start off on the year-to-date results. It seems like you've got pretty strong momentum at the utilities, in particular in Tampa. Year-to-date, on a consolidated basis, you're tracking a little bit below what might be assumed just from your rate base growth. Can you talk a little bit about how you see that momentum tracking into the second half? Perhaps what levers or timing considerations we should be thinking about as we think about how the earnings should shape up in the second half? Yeah. Dariusz, I mean, we're comfortable with the path we're on. I think it's important to remember that our year-to-date results, you know, include the exceptionally strong first quarter of 2021 that we had with Emera Energy because of Winter Storm Uri. And that was not expected. You know, we were not expected to duplicate that or replicate that in 2022. The rest of the businesses are performing very well. I think what you see in Q2 is likely more reflective of what we expect to see over the balance of the year. Great. Thank you. That's helpful. One more if I can, just on the utility side of things. Can you talk a little bit about what type of normalized growth you're seeing in terms of load across customer classes? You cited some very strong customer growth figures, but just curious how that's manifesting in the load that you're seeing. Yeah. I guess, you know, it's always difficult, Dariusz, to try to break apart the weather aspect to it versus everything else. I'd say what we're seeing in particular, electric utilities, we're seeing load growth on a weather normalized basis, more or less start to match customer growth, which historically that has not been the case because of energy efficiency. Often load growth was slightly less than customer growth, and those two seemingly are a little bit more in line these days than they have been over the past number of years. Okay, great. I appreciate those responses. I'll pass it here. Thank you. Thanks, Dariusz. Thank you. The next question comes from Andrew Kuske of Credit Suisse. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning. Maybe you could give us some perspective on just your existing land positions in and around generation facilities where you could build either solar or just integrate battery technology. You know, along the lines of what you did at Big Bend across the portfolio, just to give us a sense of how you could use existing transmission infrastructure to really help energy transition on an accelerated fashion without causing rate shock. Good morning, Andrew. It's Archie from Tampa Electric. I'll try to answer that question. If I don't hit the mark, let me know. You know, TECO has a fair amount of land that we hold on our balance sheet for future use, you know, throughout our service territory and on the fringes of our service territory. Some of that is being held for transmission rights of way expansions or for potential locations to site future generation. Much of what we hold really isn't suitable for solar development, and so our real estate team is continuously out scouring the market, looking to add cost-effective real estate that would be suitable for solar expansion. Perhaps it's Peter from Nova Scotia Power. Just to add, in Nova Scotia, really, I guess in three areas, when you think about the decarbonization journey, we will be converting existing coal plants to gas-fired generation. It's utilizing existing plants, just converting the generation source. On the transmission side, obviously, when we talk about Atlantic Loop, that will require transmission to be built between Nova Scotia, New Brunswick. We've acquired most of those land rights. They are in the process of acquiring the remaining land rights for that project. I guess the last thing I would say, just referencing the grid-scale battery announcement that came out that we do have four sites across the province for those installations as well. I think the only thing to add to that, Andrew, it's Scott, you know, in those cases where we can, we do. You know, one of the two now of the solar sites for Tampa Electric are on buffer lands to Big Bend Station. You know, those areas where we can use land that is not yet productive but is suitable for solar or for storage, that's very much what happens. You know, Big Bend Station is a good example where there is a significant amount of solar. You may even recall, in a trip that showed some analysts and shareholders a couple of years ago, there's also battery storage at that site as well. Where we can use land holdings for development of cleaner energy storage or generation, we absolutely do. A lot of it is not necessarily suitable for that, in which case, we need to be adding to those land resources in order to build that generation. If I could just add one other point, it would be that, you know, when it comes to siting renewables, certainly solar investments, we're also excited about the prospect of floating solar. In fact, we We've done, you know, a pilot floating solar project on the Big Bend property. That's, you know, land is increasingly difficult to come by in Florida. It's a destination of choice. There's lots of people moving there, but there is lots of wetland that could be a great location for solar if we can get the price point right. That's very helpful color and context. I remember the trip quite well to the site. Maybe just focusing on a part of the answer from earlier on the transition in Atlantic Canada, Nova Scotia in particular, just on natural gas availability and supply availability. What are your thoughts on the outlook for natural gas and having sufficient supply and from multiple sources? Yeah. Certainly from our planning and our outlook for the requirement for natural gas for our use, we do have sufficient supply. We're obviously working with local gas provider here in Nova Scotia to make sure that that supply gets to exactly where we need it. Just a reminder, when we think about, you know, the coal to gas conversions, those won't be baseload generation plants. Those will be largely peaker plants, dispatchable capacity plants that we need for reliability purposes. Very helpful. I'll leave it at that. Thank you. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if there are any additional questions, please press star one at this time. The next question comes from Matthew Weekes of iA Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. Maybe just a couple clarifications. I'm just wondering, you know, if you can remind us, what your sensitivity to changes in the foreign exchange rates is, you know, based on hedges you have in place, versus, you know, what you build into your plan. Yeah. Matthew, it's Greg. I mean, in general or, you know, directional, a $0.01 change in currency is a couple of cents in EPS. As you're well aware, we do have a hedging program in place where we try to mitigate that exposure. We have obviously taken advantage of the weakness of the Canadian dollar over the last little while, and we have about 40% of our 2023 US dollar earnings hedged at a little less than $1.30. We have about 20% of our 2024 expected US dollar earnings hedged at a little bit better than $1.30. Okay, thanks. Sorry, that was 20% on 2024, correct? Correct. Okay. Thanks. Then just on the cash flow and looking at the difference in your slide and the, you know, the 7.6 year to date versus 9.66 sort of potential. Is that the bridge there just based on the amount of under recovery that you expect to recover over the next 12 months, mainly at Tampa Electric, based on what you've filed for at this point? Yeah. The difference, the $200 million plus difference is really the under recovery of fuel costs at Tampa Electric for the first six months of the year. There's a little bit of Nova Scotia Power in there as well, but it's mostly Tampa Electric. We're still working through what our regulatory approach will be. We have the ability to file a second mid-year course correction if we so choose. We also have to do a filing to true up fuel rates on January first of 2023, which would be our 2023 forecast, as well as any expected underrecovery this year. We're just working through the regulatory approach to that. We would expect that a good portion, if not all of it, would be collected before the end of next year. Okay, thanks. I appreciate the commentary. I'll turn it back. Thanks, Matthew. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. Please continue. Okay. At this time, we'll close the call. Thanks for your interest, and we'll talk again in another quarter. Thank you. Thank you. This does conclude the conference call for today. We thank you for your participation and ask that you please disconnect your lines.