Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to Equinox Gold's Q2 2023 results and corporate update. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there'll be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press Star, then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing Star, then zero. If you're participating through the webcast, you can submit a question in writing by using the text box in the lower left corner of the webcast frame. I would now like to turn the conference over to Rhylin Bailie, Vice President of Investor Relations for Equinox Gold. Please go ahead. Thank you, Galen, and thank you everybody for joining us this morning. We will, of course, be making a number of forward-looking statements today, so please do visit our continuous disclosure documents on our website, on SEDAR and in EDGAR. I'd now like to turn the call over to our CEO and President, Greg Smith. Thanks, Raelynn. Good morning, and thanks everyone for joining us today, especially at this very early hour on the West Coast here. On the call with me is our CEO, Doug Reddy, our CFO, Peter Hardie, our EVP of Exploration, Scott Heffernan, and our VP of Investor Relations, Rhylin Bailie, who you just heard from. As a quick introduction to those new to the company, Equinox is a diversified, Americas-focused gold producer. We have seven producing mines across Brazil, Mexico, and the United States, and we also have several growth projects, including our large-scale Greenstone gold mine in Ontario, which is in construction now with our 40% joint venture partner, Orion Mine Finance. Today we're discussing our 2023 Q2 financial and operating results. Before we jump into those results, I just want to acknowledge the fatality at our Santa Luz mine in June. This was a tragic incident, and we extend our deepest sympathies to our employee's family, friends, and coworkers. We had a 1-week site-wide suspension of operations at Santa Luz to facilitate the investigation and to refresh safety training. I'll now start with a broad overview for the quarter, and then I'll turn over the call to Pete and Doug Reddy for more details. We had a solid quarter with sales of just over 138,000 ounces at a cash cost per ounce sold of $1,361, and an all-in sustaining cost per ounce sold of $1,502. For the first six months of the, we sold 261,000 ounces at cash costs of $1,354 per ounce, and all-in sustaining costs of $1,576 per ounce. This reflects record sales for the company for the first 6 months of the year, and we remain on track to meet our 2023 production and cost guidance. On Tuesday, this week, we issued a press release with a full Greenstone update. For those that didn't see it, the team at Greenstone has done a great job of continuing to advance the mine on time and on budget for first gold pour in the first half of 2024. As of July 21st, we were 85% complete overall at Greenstone. There's loads of pictures on the website, and you can really see how far the project's come and advanced over the course of this year, and Doug will have more to say on Greenstone in a few minutes. During the quarter, we also continued to progress the feasibility study on the addition of an underground mine at Aurizona, and we're gonna continue to conduct some additional work, including trade-off studies on throughput from the underground mine. This means we'll complete the study next year. This timing also allows us to proceed with construction of a portal and a decline, which we plan to include in our capital budget for 2024. Our work so far, shows excellent potential for a long life underground mine in Aurizona, so we're keeping our foot on the gas in terms of development while we progress the feasibility study, and Doug will also comment more on this. We finished the quarter with unrestricted cash balance of $174 million, plus approximately $130 million available from our credit facility, for a total of over $300 million in available cash liquidity at quarter end. With cash flow from operations, this leaves us well-funded through the completion of construction at Greenstone. We also published our third comprehensive ESG report in May, and just recently in July, we published our first Water Stewardship Report. These reports summarize our performance during 2022, our targets for 2023, and our long-term strategy across a range of ESG initiatives. They're both available on our website, along with our Climate Action Report, and I encourage everyone on this call to check them out. With that, I'd like to hand the call over to Peter Hardie to run through our financial results. Thanks, Greg. We're now on slide 6 in the presentation. From a gold sales and revenue perspective, we had our best first half of a year in the company's history. During the quarter, for the 138,000 ounces we sold, we received an average realized price of $1,962 per ounce. That's $1,931 year to date, generating $272 million in revenue, $506 million year to date. We sold 15,000 more ounces in Q2 as compared to Q1 of this year, and about 18,000 more ounces than we did, for the 120,000 ounces that we sold in Q2 last year. Our cash cost per ounce of $1,361 for Q2, is similar to that of Q1 of this year, and down from Q2 of last year of $1,482. Our all-in sustaining cost per ounce of Q2 this year of $1,502 is down from Q1's $1,576 and also down from Q2 last year. Last year's $1,657. As to forward views on input costs, unit prices, we're now starting to see decreases, particularly diesel and cyanide in Brazil and the U.S. Those unit cost decreases in Brazil are somewhat offset by the strength of the real against the US dollar. Our EBITDA in Q2 2023 was $64 million, or $71 million on an adjusted basis. We had net income of $5 million for basic and fully diluted earnings per share of $0.02. On an adjusted basis, we had a net loss of $6 million or $0.02 a share. Cash flow from operations before changes in working capital was $81 million or $0.26 a share. Included in that cash flow from operations is the receipt of an additional $10 million from the gold prepay arrangement. If you back out those funds, we generated $71 million in cash flow from operations, or about $0.22 a share. In terms of liquidity and capital position, we ended the quarter with $174 million of unrestricted cash and $127 million available to draw on our credit facility, giving us total liquidity of a little over $300 million. We did draw the remainder of the revolver on August 1st, further to the gold sale prepay transactions entered in Q1. As I mentioned, we did enter into an additional gold sale prepay on June 23rd, whereby, with one of the members of the syndicate that provided the prepay, we received $10 million in exchange for delivering to the lender 263 ounces of gold per month from October 2024 to July 2026, for a total of just under 6,000 ounces. Those terms reflect, and that delivery period reflects that of the prepay that we did earlier in the year. Concurrent with the execution of the gold prepay sale transaction in June, we entered into financial swap agreements that fixed the gold price relating to that $10 million at $2,109 per ounce. Net debt increased from $113 million at the end of Q1 to $548 million. Going from $548 million to $661 million at the end of Q2. On slide 7, what does it mean for Greenstone? Based on progress to date, we believe our share of the remaining construction budget is about $170 million, and we expect to fund that through our cash that we had at the end of the quarter, our operating cash flow, and the final draw on the revolving credit facility. Additionally, we still have the $100 million accordion feature in place. With those sources of liquidity, as Greg mentioned, we believe we're well-funded to complete Greenstone construction. With that, I will turn the time over for Doug to review the operations. Thanks, Pete. As mentioned earlier, we had a very good first half of the year, and we are looking at pushing hard to deliver strong production in the second half. We've noted before that about 55% of production this year is in the second half of the year. At Mesquite, the Brownie Pit provided majority of new ore, about 90% of the ore going to the leach pad, and re-leaching on portions of the pad also contributed significantly to the Q2 gold production. Mining costs at Mesquite benefited from a drop in diesel prices, and just for example, the current price is about 30% lower than it was in Q2 last year. Process costs were reduced through reduction of cyanide and lime usage. We don't see that staying the same in, in the second half 'cause we, we plan on stacking more in the second half, so the overall cost will go up on cyanide and lime. At Castle Mountain, throughput has increased 40% since the start of the year in the crusher, and the crusher run time's up by about 30%. We continue with modifications to the crusher setup, and we're planning for those additional modifications to be implemented in Q3. At Los Filos, productivity improvements were seen in both open pit and underground. Open pit has about 15% higher productivity, along with loading improvements and an increase in effective operating hours. For underground, there's about 23% increase in the ore tons being mined. Although we... Although we have more tons going to the leach pad, we did have some challenges on the leach pad that we've been addressing. These include some higher copper ore coming from the Guadalupe open pit. I do note that this is only a portion of the ore, and it represents about 12% of the tons being stacked for the remainder of the year. We also had issues with solution, solution management related to some broken pipes in one area of the pad. Those have since been repaired, and the pregnant solution in that area where the breakage occurred needs to be drained. That impacts about 8,000 ounces. That is slow in coming out of the pad. It will come out, it's just gonna be slower coming out than originally anticipated. We also had one portion of the leach pad, which had to be turned again and leached again after a carbonate precipitation occurred, which has hindered recovery. That impacts about 4,000 ounces. Again, those ounces will come out in the second half of the year. At Aurizona, in addition to the current mining contractor, we also mobilized a second contractor with articulated dump trucks. They'll be in for most of the rest of 2023. They came in during the rainy season. The rainy season is over now. We're putting a big push on the mining and to establish a larger stockpile in advance of the next rainy season. At Fazenda, we're currently mining mostly from open pits, while the underground also catches up on development, and we'll work on bringing additional stopes into production. Drilling continues on the reserve replacement program at Fazenda. It's been successful every year, and we continue doing that successful in replacing reserves every year. At RDM, we had good performance from the owner-operated fleet. That fleet is a combination of our own trucks, plus 15 60-ton rental trucks. The increase in mining of higher grade in-situ ore has brought the production up significantly in the quarter, and the mill feed is, I'll note that mill feed is also being augmented with low-grade stockpiles if there is any availability in the mill. At Santa Luz, the team continues to gradually bring recovery up, and the plant had an average overall recovery of 67% in the quarter. We are targeting 70% or better for the remainder of the year, and the team continues to work on process and throughput improvements. Moving on to Greenstone. I get the pleasure of being able to speak about a really good story on construction progress, and the team's done a great job. We put out the Greenstone update news release on Tuesday and provided a complete summary of the project status. Essentially, the project is on budget and on schedule for H1 2024 production. Moving on to the next page, looking at progress. Overall progress at Greenstone is 85% complete, which is comprised of construction at 83% complete, engineering is 100% complete, and procurement is 87% complete. Capital spend at June 30th is $937 million, which is 76% complete of the budget on a 100% basis, and we have approximately $170 million remaining as Equinox Gold's share to fund through to project completion. Facilities handed over to operations so far are the permanent effluent water treatment plant, truck shop, warehouse, sewage treatment plant, potable water treatment plant, the pit and plant site fuel stations, reagent storage building, and site-mixed emulsion or explosives plant. The Ministry of Transport patrol yard's been turned over to the ministry, and the dismantling of the old patrol yard is now complete. Highway 11 realignment is also complete and has now been transferred to the ministry, and was opened to the public a few days ago. The natural gas pipeline to site has been commissioned and is now operational. Plant site is 75% complete. The TSF is 80% complete. Operations are now at 240 employees. We'll get to around 360 employees by year-end. We look forward to hosting an analyst and investor visit in early September. Now moving on to our other expansion projects. At Castle Mountain, the we continue in permitting. We've responded to queries from, and we anticipate permitting being complete in 2025. In the meantime, we continue with engineering work and with met test work to support the phase 2 of Castle Mountain. At Aurizona, as Greg mentioned, we've been advancing the engineering studies, and these incorporate additional drilling. The recent work looked at the underground mining at a higher production rate, given the large scale of the underground resource. We see benefits in continuing to advance our studies and operating with both open pit and underground to concurrently fill the plant. We are looking, we are planning on developing an exploration decline in H1 2024, which would provide us an opportunity to develop down to one of the ore zones, mine in the ore zone, and enable collection of geotechnical and hydrogeological information on ore and wall rock. The plan is to have a fully dimensioned decline that would serve as a production access and would also enable a rapid start to underground production when we've completed our additional studies. At Filos, we continue to assess the opportunity to invest in CIL, but we do remain focused on having the right climate in Mexico and within the region before committing to the major investment, and while we also have competing opportunities for capital investment on other projects. With that, I'm going to hand it back to Greg. Thanks, Doug. I think I'll just make a final comment here to thank the entire Equinox Gold team in Vancouver and at all of our sites, as well as our shareholders and other stakeholders for their continued support, and finish up there and pass it back to Rlyn for Q&A. Perfect. Thanks. Galen, can you please remind people how to ask a question? Certainly. Once again, to join the question queue, you may press Star, then One on your telephone keypad. You'll hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you're using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press Star, then Two. If you're participating through the webcast, you can submit a question in writing by using the text box in the lower left corner of the webcast frame. We will pause for a moment as callers join the queue. Thank you. Well, there's no online questions yet, so you can go ahead and take questions from the phone, please. Thanks. The first question is from Kerry Smith with Haywood Securities. Please go ahead. Thanks, operator. Good, good morning, everybody, and congratulations on a good quarter. I had a couple of questions, Greg. First one was on Greenstone. There was $177 million of contingency built in to that $1.23 billion CapEx. How much of that have you actually spent so far on the project? Has it been roughly proportionate to the% spend that you've completed on the project, or has it been more or less? No, it's, it's roughly proportionate, Kerry, and, and when we talk about amounts left to spend, we're, we're assuming that we go through that contingency. It was included in the initial total budget amount, and we think we're going to come in at that total budget amount. Okay, okay, that's, that's helpful. Thanks. Then the second question I had, just on the convertible notes, the $140 million that are due next April, what, what is the plan or the strategy to deal with those notes to try and roll them out? Yeah, it's something we've been, we've been, kind of working on recently. I think that there's a couple of options. Obviously, our first choice would be that they're well in the money and, and, we issue that equity, but you can't always plan for that. So, we are talking to the holders, Mubadala, who are, who are very constructive, and of course, we have other options available to us, in terms of the market. So it is something that's on our radar, Kerry, and at some point, we'll, we'll, report what we're doing on that specifically. Okay. Do you think you'd have a strategy in place by Q3, or is that something that's gonna fall into, early next year? I, whenever you've got debt maturing within a year, and especially when you're in a large capital program like this, I think it makes sense to be ahead of it rather than too tied up against it. If we can have something done over the course of the next several months, I think that would be our preference. Yeah. Yeah, I would agree. Okay, the last question I had, how much CapEx do you think there will be left to fund for Greenstone in 2024? Hey, Kerry, it's Pete. We believe $170 million will get us through to the point where we don't need to fund CapEx anymore. The budget that we prepared assumes it's all of the CapEx that the partners are gonna have to provide the project before it's able to take care of itself and support itself. How, how much of that $170 will flow into the next fiscal year, though, roughly? Oh, we're, we're on track for the $277 we were gonna spend this year. Sorry, I don't have that split between this year and next year at my fingertips. Okay. Okay, okay. Maybe Rhylin can slip me a text after and just let me know what that number is. Right. That would be helpful. Thank you. The next question is from Anita Soni with CIBC. Please go ahead. Hi, I'll just follow up on that. I, I believe it's $180 million that you spent to date or, or into June 30th, up to $277 million. I assume that's about $70 million left for next year. Is that correct? Yeah, Anita, thanks for clarifying. Thanks. Okay, I have 2 questions, just firstly on the leach inventory. I think there was some buildup in Q1 and then some additional buildup in Q2. Can you just give me an idea of how much is allocated to each 1 of the assets? I believe the majority is to Los Filos, right? Yeah, that's fair. Yeah. Okay. Are there any others? I noticed, like Santa Luz and Mesquite, I had to put some inventory adjustments in to, to get into the, the cash costs and the AISC that you were reporting. There is some at Mesquite and a smaller amount at, at Castle, but it's predominantly Los Filos. was there anything for- We do maintain, Anita, a fairly large stockpile at Santa Luz. That's how we manage the blend of the ore going into the mill. Okay. The mining has exceeded throughput at Santa Luz, and we are working at, at building and, and maintaining a fairly large stockpile there. It's, it's just more complicated than the other mines because you're trying to manage around the total organic carbon in the ore. Okay. That if n ext time you go there, you'll see. It's a, it's a stockpile inventory management before anything goes into the mill. Okay, that's broken or above ground stock rather than something in the- Yes, yes. Okay. Yeah. Okay, my second. I guess the final comment, Anita, on, on Santa Luz is they also, they also built up their spare parts, consumables, inventory balances a little over the first half of this year as well. You might see that... Okay In the inventory figure, at Santa Luz. Okay. For the remaining assets, I think it was Los Filos, Mesquite and, that we were talking about and Castle Mountain, those should probably reverse over the course of the year? I think you said for sure at Los Filos, but I just wanted to confirm for Mesquite. Yes, for Filos and Mesquite, yes. Okay. Both of them are. Then just on... Sorry, just on, on Greenstone. I think we were, as, as I mentioned, $180 million a year to date on the, the spend. How is it gonna play out for Q3 and Q4? Is it really bulky in Q3, your spend, and then tapers down into Q4 for the $277 million that you had had said? I think, as I mentioned, there was about $100 million left for this year, in the back half of the year. Yeah, that's right, Anita. We do expect that kind of typical S-curve. There's a lot of activity happening now, and then you'll see tapering through Q4. Okay. Then I think I had one more question, and that was, oh, I forgot, and I'll get back into the queue. Thanks. All right. We got a question from an investor in Kuala Lumpur, asking just, can you give any more clarity on how things are going at Filos and when you might be able to start the expansion there? Like I said earlier, at the moment, we're, we're monitoring the status in Mexico in general, but also in the region. We continue with the current heap leach operations, mining from Los Filos open pit, Los Filos underground, Bermejal open pit, and Guadalupe open pit. We are advancing in our discussions with the communities as well. We haven't picked the timing yet. It's rushing into it with Los Filos when we have other development projects also on the go at Aurizona and Castle Mountain. W e are judicious on how we deploy our capital. Yeah, no decision will come on Los Filos during 2023. Maybe in 2024, we can provide more clarity. Operator, do you want to take Anita's follow-up call? Certainly. The next question is from Anita Soni with CIBC. Hi, I'm back. It was a question with regards to the sustaining capital. I think you've spent about 35% year to date. I just wanted to get an idea. You did mention that you'll be spending it over the back half of the year, the remaining 65. Will it be all 65, or, do you expect to come in a little bit under what you had previously guided to? Yeah, we are planning on, on catching up on that sustaining spend, Anita. We deferred some equipment expenditure at Los Filos. RDM, we deferred some of the tailings work into the second half of the year. We had planned on doing some of that work in Q2. Yeah, we do plan on doing that in the second half of the year. Okay, the full- We believe we're on track for our full spend for the year. Okay, is it an even split between Q3 and Q4? It's always, it's always heavily weighted into Q4. It's just- It's, that, it's that somewhat, call it typical operations pattern, where you head into budgeting and, and, and my managers or general managers recognize that, they, they got behind on the sustaining spend and want to get it done before the end of the year. You can just, yeah, assume that we'll have more in Q4. Okay, you got to move up their dead- budget deadlines to, like, to look through or something. Get them going. Okay, thanks. Thanks,... So, so higher sustaining capital spend in Q4, but lower sustaining capital spend at Green-- or sorry, lower development capital spend at Greenstone in Q4. Correct. Okay, thank you. The next question is from Wayne Lam with RBC. Please go ahead. Oh, hey, great. Thanks, guys. Just wondering at Santa Luz, obviously, a very unfortunate situation this past quarter. Can you just provide a bit more detail into what happened in terms of breaching safety protocols? No, Wayne, the answer is no, and the reason is because we haven't really, you know out of respect for, for the employee's family, colleagues, we're not going into any, any details, publicly on what happened. Okay. Got it. Thanks. Then maybe at Greenstone, really nice to see things on track. Just wondering, with the project, 85% complete, $170 million left to spend, and $300 million in cash with the revolver fully drawn, are you guys seeing any additional large spend or bottleneck items ahead as you enter the home stretch here? The, the short answer, Wayne, is no. T he focus is on-- we're in that phase towards the tail end of construction. It, it's a fairly linear relationship between the amount of piping and electrical installation you have and, and, the manpower that you have doing it and their productivity rate. They've, they've made great progress through the summer, which is what was planned, and, and very fortunately, they're, they're staying on schedule on that front. It's, it's really just keeping working that schedule, maintaining the productivity rates that we need. We're happy with our commissioning readiness. We had a great report from Greenstone yesterday that the recruiting is going very well in relation to operational readiness. We had an external review of our operational readiness by another group, which also went well. With respect to what we have left, based on all the feedback that we have, from our work internally, from the assessments that we have done by independent groups, we, we don't believe, right now that we do have bottlenecks that have a significant remaining risk, unmitigated risk related to them. Doug, Doug referenced, employ-- how many employees we have today and where we need to get to by the end of the year. W e're in a pretty heavy recruitment drive to ramp up the workforce. That's, that's actually going really well. It was a little challenging, like, a few months ago. We, we had our own questions of whether we'd get there, but as the mines advance, we've, we've, we've been able to really increase the level of work- workforce for operations quite quickly, and it looks like we're on track for year-end. That, that was one area where, we definitely knew we had to focus. Now we just got a full update yesterday again, and things are going very well at Greenstone, hopefully, you're coming, Wayne, in September, and you can see it for yourself. Yep. Yep. I definitely plan to be there, and sounds like you guys are in a pretty comfortable spot. Just wanted to confirm, the original CapEx number had about $125 million in fleet purchases. Can you remind me if you guys have moved to fleet financing? Do you happen to have an estimate of what kind of operating cost impact that might have as we kind of look out to next year? We did move to fleet financing, Wayne, and we haven't done any guidance on what 2024 and operations look like. We don't have an update on how that might affect operating costs. We will obviously provide that as part of our 2024 guidance when we release it, it's not something that we have today. Okay, got it. Maybe just last one from me. Just on the inflationary impacts, do you guys have any percentage estimate on how much consumables have kind of eased versus your budget? Some of your peers have noted quite a bit of offset on the input cost easing, just given the stronger local currencies in Mexico and Brazil. Just wondering if you guys are feeling those pressures as well, as an offset to the input costs? How have you been managing that? Yeah. Prior to consideration of that FX strength that you see in Brazil and Mexico, we are starting to see some tapering in unit input costs, which we're obviously very happy to see. In Mexico, even prior to consideration of FX, with respect to diesel, Pemex, the government, I should say, or, or Pemex, they, they, they tend to buffer fuel price increases, but at the same time, when fuel prices taper, there's an effect where that's buffered as well. While we have seen fuel come off, as Doug already mentioned, quite reasonably in the U.S. and also in Brazil, we haven't seen that necessarily in Mexico. With respect to H- FX, yeah, the, the FX in Brazil and Mexico is almost effectively offsetting the unit price decreases that we're seeing. With respect-- With regards to cost management, we hedge about 50% of the near term FX exposures that we have in Mexico and Brazil. That's been helping some, which is why you see realized gains on, on our FX in our financials. That's what that program is. Hopefully, that gives you a rough idea of, of, of what we're seeing and, and how we try and manage the risk. Okay. Sounds good. That's great. All right. Yeah, thanks for taking my questions, and good luck in the months ahead. Thanks, Wayne. Thanks, Wayne. I've got a question online from Ovais Habib, our analyst at Scotiabank. Ovais says, "Cash costs in the first half have been below the guidance range. How should we look at the second half? Are you on track to beat the cash cost guidance, or is there a catch-up in costs and all-in sustaining over the second half that we should expect? I'll address the all-in sustaining first, as, I think it's in the same line of questioning that Anita mentioned. Some of the sustaining capital was deferred into the second half of the year. We do intend to spend that, so you'll see an increase there on a per unit basis. With respect to cash costs as well, we do, we do think they'll go up some as the inventory releases from the buildups, that especially when related to our leaching operations. We see those going up a little. I'll just reiterate, if we, if we hit around the top end of our guidance, then we will come in, we believe, right around the low end of both our cash cost and sustaining, all-in sustaining cost guidance. Thank you. Operator, you can take the next question from the phone, please. Thank you. The next question is from Dalton Baretto with Canaccord Genuity. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, guys. You sound good considering the hour there. A few questions from me. Just first off, on liquidity. Outside of your i-80 Gold 's stake, are you kind of happy with the existing liquidity you have right now relative to the remaining spend, or are you gonna look to get out bolstered a little bit? Yeah, outside of i-80, we're relatively happy. We don't see ourselves bolstering it. Okay, great. Just on the 40% Orion stake in Greenstone, I know you can't speak to their intentions, but, on the chance that they look to offload their stake, kind of post commercial production, do you guys have a ROFR on that stake? Then have you given any thought to how you would fund that? Yes, we have a ROFR. I think it's fair to say that, we'd love to own more of Greenstone. Have we given any thought to how we'd fund it? I mean, not, it's definitely nothing that I would call advanced. It's on our radar for sure, because at some point, we expect we're gonna need to act if we don't do something, preemptive. A bsolutely it's something we think about, it's something we talk to them about, and, absolutely, we'd like to own more of Greenstone. How that ends up playing out, Dalton, I couldn't speak to that right now. Okay, thanks. Then, once Greenstone is in commercial production, how are you thinking about the broader portfolio? Are you kind of happy with it right now, or are you gonna look to make some changes? I guess I'd, I'd say something I think I've said in the past, which is, over the course of building the company, we've, we've acquired mines, we've developed mines, and we've sold some mines. We're always looking to uptier the portfolio. If we can get to a place where we've got, larger, longer life, mines that fill out our production profile, that's, that's a goal that we aspire to. I, I think we've got a lot of upside in our portfolio that we want to surface. That's not to say that, we wouldn't make changes in the future. Right now, we're very focused on getting Greenstone built, up and running, and in commercial production. Then, we've got a little more flexibility around the, the longer-term strategy at that point. At this stage, we just wanna keep our eye on the ball there at Greenstone. Thanks. Maybe just one last one. On, Castle Mountain Phase 2, it sounds like you've got an initial response from the BLM, and they look like they're gonna, perhaps accept the, application. Have they flagged any kind of, let's call them, high-risk areas that they'll be looking at, or is this gonna be reasonably straightforward? Well, both the county and BLM had a period where they can do their, I think it's called, assessment of completeness of our application. They made additional inquiries. We responded, and it's just in the overall permitting process. There's no indication of anything other than we've moved to the point of answering the questions to be complete, to be able to enter fully into the rest of the process. Okay, at this point in time, there's no kind of indications as to what they're gonna be focused on, where they're gonna, look to actually, yeah, mitigate certain things, water, that sort of thing? This looks really straightforward, Dalton, at this stage. I t's, it's an already operating mine. We're not expanding beyond the currently permitted EIS footprint that's already there. We're not meaningfully changing the, the, processing that was there previously. I t's a straightforward application. I, I guess, the most painful part to us is just time, right? It's, it, it's got to go through their process. I wish this, this permit was coming in in 2024. Looks like it's gonna be 2025. No, we haven't received any, comments that I would characterize as, as, controversial or concerning to us. Great. Thanks, guys. That's all for me. Right. Well, we've got no further questions. If anybody thinks of anything after having a couple of cups of coffee, please do get in touch by email. Greg, do you have any closing remarks? No, just thanks everyone for, for joining the call so early today. I promise it's not something we're gonna make a habit of. We, we had to accommodate some schedules, but I do appreciate those that, that got up early and attended the call. Thanks again for joining, and as Rhylin said, you can always reach out to us directly, and we're happy to answer questions. Okay, thank you. Gailin, you can close the call. Thank you. This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.