Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the CGI first quarter fiscal 2021 conference call. I would now like to turn the meeting over to Mr. Maher Yaghi, Vice President, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, Mr. Yaghi. Thank you, Sharon, and good morning. With me to discuss CGI's first quarter fiscal 2021 results are George Schindler, our President and CEO, and François Boulanger, Executive Vice President and CFO. This call is being broadcast on cgi.com and recorded live at 9:00 A.M. Eastern Time on Wednesday, January 27, 2021. Supplemental slides, as well as the press release we issued earlier this morning, are available for download along with our Q1 MD&A financial statements and accompanying notes, all of which have been filed with both SEDAR and EDGAR. Please note that some statements made on the call may be forward-looking. Actual events or results may differ materially from those expressed or implied, and CGI disclaims any intent or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. The complete safe harbor statement is available in both our MD&A and press release, as well as on cgi.com. We encourage our investors to read it in its entirety. We are reporting our financial results in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, or IFRS. As always, we will also discuss non-GAAP performance measures, which should be viewed as supplemental. The MD&A contains definitions of each one used in our reporting. All of the dollar figures expressed on this call are Canadian unless otherwise noted. We are also hosting our AGM this morning, so we hope you will join us live via the broadcast at 11:00 A.M. I'll turn it over now to François to review our Q1 financials, and then George will comment on our operational highlights and strategic outlook. François? Thank you, Maher, and good morning, everyone. I'm happy to share with you the results of our first quarter 2021. Our results in the quarter demonstrate the ongoing resilience of CGI's business model and the relevance of the services we provide to our clients, despite continued pandemic-related shutdowns. Overall, we are pleased with our first quarter results as we turn the corner on revenue, while at the same time saw strong growth in our bookings, profitability, and cash generation. We delivered revenue of CAD 3 billion, down 1.2% when compared to last year, representing a constant currency decline of 3.6% year-over-year. This is an improvement over last quarter, where we saw a 4.5% decrease year-over-year. As we mentioned last quarter, we continue to expect a gradual improvement in the months and quarters ahead and reiterate our expectation of returning to revenue growth in the second half of fiscal 2021. Total bookings were up 23.5% year-over-year, representing CAD 3.4 billion in new contracts for book-to-bill of 113% of revenue and lifting our trailing 12 months book-to-bill to 103%. New business was 28% of bookings, an increase from the previous quarter's 22%. IP bookings in the quarter were up 58% year-over-year. IP was 21% of revenue in the quarter, the same as last year, despite the continued pressure on lower transaction volumes in both payroll and travel-related services due to the pandemic. Our global backlog remains healthy at CAD 22.8 billion, or 1.9 times revenue, the vast majority of which is comprised of long-term managed services engagements. Adjusted EBIT in Q1 was up 4.6% from the year-over-year period at CAD 496 million, while EBIT margins increased to 16.4%, up 90 basis points compared to Q1 last year. The year-over-year increase was mainly the result of savings from our restructuring plan, lower discretionary expenses, and the benefit of synergies achieved through the integration of prior year's acquisitions. As highlighted last quarter, our restructuring costs, including actions taken in response to the pandemic, total CAD 155 million and were completed during our fiscal year ended September 30, 2020. As such, I'm pleased to report that we did not incur any additional restructuring costs this quarter and do not foresee additional pandemic-related actions at this time. Our effective tax rate in Q1 was 25.9%. This compares with 25.1% last year when excluding integration and restructuring expenses. This is within our expected range for the year. Net earnings were CAD 343 million, for a margin of 11.4%, and diluted earnings per share were CAD 1.32, representing an increase of 24.5% year-over-year. Excluding integration and restructuring costs, net earnings were CAD 347 million for a margin of 11.5%, and diluted earnings per share were CAD 1.33 compared to CAD 1.23 in the same quarter last year for an accretion of 8.1%. We continue to generate strong cash flow. In the quarter, cash provided by operating activities was CAD 597 million, or 19.8% of revenue, representing an increase of CAD 132 million compared with Q1 last year. This improvement was driven by a DSO of 44 days compared to 47 days last quarter. For the last 12 months, cash provided by operating activities was CAD 2.1 billion or 17% of revenue. In Q1, we continue allocating capital with discipline. We invested CAD 56 million back into our business, largely in IP and managed services engagements. After a pause in the last two quarters, we resumed share buybacks in Q1, investing CAD 436 million for the purchase and cancellation of 4.7 million shares of CGI. In line with our build and buy strategy, we acquired HMB's Professional Services Division, enabling us to deepen our presence within the Columbus, Ohio metro market. Net debt to capitalization decreased due to a higher level of cash generation from 24% in Q4 to 23% at the end of December. Consistent with previous years, we reviewed our capital return program to formulate the most effective capital deployment strategy to maximize shareholder returns. Buying back CGI stock has been an accretive and flexible way to return capital to shareholders. As such, our board of directors approved yesterday the extension of the program until February 2022, allowing us to purchase up to 19.2 million shares over the next 12 months. Looking ahead, our cash allocation priority remains the same, which is to focus our investments on growing our business. With cash of CAD 1.7 billion on hand and a CAD 1.5 billion revolver that remains fully accessible, we now have CAD 3.2 billion readily available to pursue this profitable growth strategy. Now we'll turn the call over to George to provide more details on the operations and on the outlook for our business and markets. George? Thank you, François. Good morning, everyone. We started fiscal year 2021 in a strong position as a result of our team's trusted client partnerships, quality project delivery, and operational excellence. In the quarter, we delivered on our plan to preserve and expand shareholder value with continued margin growth and EPS accretion. Our notable cash generation in the quarter reflects CGI's resilience and increases our capacity to invest in accelerating our build and buy profitable growth strategy. The rising client demand that began to materialize last quarter continued to upward trend during Q1. The overall uptick in demand was evidenced in our Q1 bookings, which were again over CAD 3 billion, up 23.5% year-over-year. Our diversified mix of services continued to be a key contributor in achieving our strong financial results. Notably, systems integration and consulting services bookings increased in the quarter, indicating an emerging rebound for project-related digitization services and driving increases in hiring, and therefore, the related near-term revenue outlook. These services are largely focused on helping clients quickly reposition to meet evolving customer demand, such as implementing cloud-native IT supply chain components for one of Europe's largest payment providers, modernizing a Canadian retailer's e-commerce platform while reducing related costs by over 60%, and leading an ERP system migration to a public cloud model for a large North American telecommunications client. In addition, over half of our revenue in the quarter was for managed services and IP engagements, including SaaS-based solutions. Overall, existing clients continued to turn to CGI as their partner of choice as we achieved a renewal rate of over 95%, driven by managed services bookings to help enable business agility and digital transformations for clients while simultaneously delivering cost savings. Consistent with last quarter, we not only sustained our incumbency with these enterprise clients, we were also awarded new scope, growing our market share. These awards included new digitization initiatives. For example, with CAE, a Canadian client for nearly 30 years, we recently expanded our strategic partnership to include new services, such as third-party ERP cloud migration. With a U.S. financial services company, we renewed a 25-year partnership based on CGI's Collections360 IP, along with added services to transition into CGI's private cloud and integrate with their hybrid cloud environment. Now, I'll review the Q1 regional performance highlights, starting in North America. Across our U.S. segments, demand remains strong in both the commercial and government industries, with a combined U.S. bookings growth in the quarter of 14% compared to last year. We renewed and expanded several IP-related agreements in the government sector, including with a U.S. Midwestern state for modernizing their financial ERP system on CGI's Advantage platform. In U.S. Federal, with the Department of Homeland Security, where we won a position on a new frame agreement to provide our federal financial accounting expertise. Revenue and adjusted EBIT were mostly stable across our U.S. segments, with some impact from moving a higher proportion of projects to our global delivery model, as well as lower volumes in transaction-based IP resulting from pandemic shutdowns. As more citizens receive vaccinations in the months to come, we expect these transaction-based IP volumes to gradually improve, along with the overall demand for our end-to-end services. In Canada, we see signs of demand recovering with a particularly strong pipeline increase of 36% in the financial sector, and a hiring increase of 14% with expertise in digital technologies, both on a year-over-year basis. Bookings were 92%, despite some client decisions pushing out of the quarter. EBIT margin percentage increased in the quarter to 23%, while revenue was primarily impacted by expanding client use of global delivery. Moving now to the U.K. and Australia. Bookings were strong at 120% book-to-bill as the team continued to win new awards, particularly in the government sector. We see demand in government digitization centered around agile, DevOps, hybrid cloud, and CGI Smart Cities IP, and the associated managed services. Margin continued to expand, reflecting an improving services mix, while revenue was relatively stable. Now moving on to mainland Europe. Across Western and Southern Europe, bookings were strong in the quarter at 129% book-to-bill, and further supported by a strengthening pipeline for the government, manufacturing, and utility sectors, up 45% collectively. In retail and consumer services, one of the most impacted sectors by the COVID, we are seeing positive signs for demand as clients refocus on rapid digital transformation. CGI is positioned as a market leader in this sector with our end-to-end retail suite of IP solutions, which incorporates Retail 360 and solutions from the recently acquired Meti. We saw a positive improvement in revenue and EBIT on a sequential basis, although the COVID and subsequent economic impacts continue to affect some clients, and consequently, year-over-year comparables. In Central and Eastern Europe, revenue, margin, and bookings all increased year-over-year due to a rebound in demand for digital initiatives, particularly in cloud, automation, and modernization projects. Going forward, we see growing opportunities for IP in this region, building on recent wins in payments and pension administration. From an industry perspective, demand is also beginning to return in the manufacturing sector and continues to be strong in communications and government. The pipeline in these sectors increased by more than 50% compared to last year. In our Northern Europe segments, bookings for the quarter were strong in both the Scandinavia and Finland, Poland, and Baltic segments at 131% and 126% book-to-bill, respectively. EBIT improved in both segments compared to last year, reflecting operational excellence initiatives despite continued revenue impacts due to the pandemic. We see demand gradually increasing in the retail, manufacturing, and government sectors in the areas of cloud, cybersecurity, and managed services. Finally, in Asia Pacific, both revenue and margin improved year-over-year. Our balanced onshore, nearshore, and offshore model continues to generate demand globally as clients seek to increase their digitization and scale up in this region by 40%, now reaching pre-pandemic levels. The strong bookings in the quarter and positive sequential growth trends underscore our confidence in returning to growth in the second half of the fiscal year. Looking ahead, given positive trends for IT services, we expect demand will only intensify across most industries. In fact, in some of the industries most impacted by the pandemic, we see increases in sequential pipeline growth, notably in manufacturing and retail and consumer services. Demand has remained high for the government, financial services, and utility sectors, all of which had year-over-year increases in bookings and strong pipelines. CGI is well-positioned to help our clients modernize and digitize. We will continue to make investments in line with our cash allocation priorities to drive profitable growth through both build and buy. This includes investments in our people, investments in the innovation of our services, and investments in acquisition. As a leading professional services firm, we believe attracting and retaining talented people is the most important investment we make. Our ownership culture is a key differentiator in retaining the best consultants and experts in the industry. Today, 86% of our employees are owners. Therefore, we continue to prioritize our ownership programs as well as investments in training for consulting skills, industry domains, and new technologies. During this challenging time, we are also proud to provide industry-leading health and wellbeing programs to all employees around the world as we continue to prioritize their health and safety. Innovation in our services spans our end-to-end portfolio, where we are prioritizing investments in high-demand areas to help modernize clients' technology supply chains, such as cloud transformation, machine learning, low and no-code platforms, and cybersecurity. Our plans include investing in our existing IP business solutions to maintain and advance our leadership position in areas such as trade, payments, Collections360, and government ERP, as well as new solutions, for example, in telehealth and energy transition. We are also reinvigorating our third-party partnerships with the ecosystem of technology providers and platform companies. Importantly, we continue to invest in longer-term, larger managed services opportunities and the business engineering and consulting experts needed to secure these engagements. We are also pursuing the buy-side of our profitable growth strategy with a growing number of active discussions in the pipeline. As François mentioned, in the quarter, we acquired the Professional Services Division of HMB, which deepens our work with commercial utilities and state government clients in the U.S. Midwest. I would like to warmly welcome the 165 new members from HMB. We continue to see industry consolidation providing additional opportunities for metro market and transformational acquisitions. We have the operational strength and financial capacity to move quickly with discipline on the right opportunities. As always, our investments are designed to return value to all three of our stakeholders, our clients, employees, and you, our shareholders. In line with our core values, we also consider how our investments benefit the communities where we live and work. For example, as a signatory to the UN Global Compact and to formalize our long-standing environmental stewardship efforts around the world, we recently announced our global target to be net zero carbon emissions by 2030. We are proud to be one of the few firms with the scale, reach, capabilities, and commitment to be our clients' global partner of choice, delivering with insights our clients can act on. Our strategic aspiration remains to double the size of the company over the next five to seven years. Thank you for your interest and support. Let's go to the questions now. Maher? Thank you, George. Just a reminder that a replay of the call will be available either via our website or by dialing 1-855-859-2056 and using the passcode 7189191. As well, a podcast of this call will be available for download within a few hours. Follow-up questions can be directed to me at 514-415-3651. Sharon, we are ready to take some questions. Thank you. First question comes from Thanos Moschopoulos with BMO Capital. Hi, good morning. George, it sounds like customer spending priorities were initially focused on cost-cutting in the initial months of the pandemic. From your commentary, it seems like there's more of a focus now on digital. Would you agree with that? If that's the case, what does that mean for the revenue mix? Does that mean that we might see SI&C kind of rebound more strongly, relative to outsourcing in the coming months? Yeah, I think that's yes to your first question. We are seeing a bit of a shift to digitization as most of our clients kind of adapted to the pandemic. Of course, as their customers more quickly adapted and got used to digital, I think that only accelerated this need for digital. That is something we're seeing. Right now, we've seen our mix stabilize right at that 55% in managed services, 45% in SI&C. Because again, as I mentioned in my opening remarks, some of our managed services are mixing in some of the digital. I don't think it'll completely reverse like it did last time. I think cost savings will continue to be important, digitization is certainly accelerating, I think, faster than most expected, and you see that in our bookings this quarter. Maybe as a function of that, as you look at your M&A pipeline, is that causing a bit of a shift in terms of the types of targets you're prioritizing, or not especially? Not especially. As you know, we're pretty disciplined on the M&A side. It really is focused on increasing our breadth and depth. As I mentioned, we continue to have an expanding list of potential opportunities that we're looking at. No, it doesn't really change our mix there. We're end-to-end. Maybe a question for François. The DSOs came down, obviously. I think that's due to a higher outsourcing mix. First of all, is that correct? Secondly, how would you see that evolving over the coming months if we see SI&C coming back a little bit? Yeah, it's correct that the fact that we have more managed services did help to reduce the DSO. Also collection was a part of why also some of the DSO went down. As you know, it can be lumpy from quarter to quarter, and sometimes large milestones can be billed and collected in a quarter. That's why also we had a good drop in the DSO this quarter. For sure, with George indicating that SI&C can pick up, that will put some pressure to the DSO, but I still think we're capable to manage it well. Great. Thanks, François. Next question comes from Richard Tse with National Bank. Yes. Thank you. George, I think you made some comments about this on the call, and I looked at the MD&A, and it seems like you've had a bit of a pickup in terms of shift to Asia Pac. I'm kind of curious, as your customers move towards digital transformation, do you expect that segment to sort of increasingly trend higher here going forward? Yeah. You are correct. I mentioned it, and you definitely see it in the MD&A, that Asia-Pac continues to be strong. I think there's more of a comfort level by certain of our clients that maybe were under-leveraged in offshore. There's more of a comfort level because now everybody's remote, so that certainly drives some increased demand. Likewise, on the other side, though, we actually see, given the importance of proximity to digitization, everybody moving every industry and every company with industry may be moving at different paces. It's still important to be in sync with the individual clients. Some that were maybe over-leveraged in offshore are rebalancing that. We believe in the global delivery model and the balanced model that we have. I think it'll drive growth both in our offshore and in our nearshore and in our proximity. We kind of like where that's going. Definitely there's a higher comfort level right now with remote work that certainly plays into the Asia-Pac, and you see that in our hiring as well, which are now back to pre-pandemic levels. Okay. As sort of the portfolio does move towards digital transformation, should we have an expectation that you have potential operating leverage as you move more towards those services? Yeah. Is there more opportunities for us? Absolutely. Because, again, digital transformation requires two things, right? There's the leveraging the new technologies. As I mentioned, we're rushing towards that, but also modernizing some of the legacy and integrating in. We play on both sides of that. As we move more to what we've been predicting, but now has accelerated on digital transformation. Yes, that's a big opportunity for CGI and our end-to-end services. Okay, great. Thank you. Thanks, Richard. Next question comes from Jason Kupferberg with Bank of America. Hey, guys. This is Cassie on for Jason. I first just wanted to ask, I mean, you guys obviously had very strong bookings this quarter, and you guys kind of saw the bookings from new clients tick up quite nicely. Can you share a little bit about what's making you win in the market? Are there differences in your go-to-market strategy now? Can we kind of expect to continue to see book-to-bill greater than 1.0 times in the coming quarter as well? Thanks. Yeah. Thanks for the question. Really on differentiating CGI from some of our competitors, it really is about client intimacy. We've been talking about this for some time. Some of the uptick in our systems integration and consulting work has established closer relationships with our clients, and that's allowing us to move quickly and move quickly in relevant ways for our clients. That's really a big differentiator. When you're going to partner with somebody for a larger digital transformation project, you've got to be comfortable with them. You've got to be comfortable not only they can execute it, which we have to be able to do, but also that they understand how to execute within their environment. That's where they're looking for a partner, and CGI has that in spades. Really, part of that also is our ownership model and the way our people show up in partnership with our clients. That really differentiates itself in a market like we're in right now in a period that we're going through still during the pandemic. Really, that's some of the benefits of the CGI model. Yes, I believe our bookings will continue to be strong as we move through this period. Okay, perfect. My follow-up question is just, by geography, it kind of looks like the US Federal piece of the booking saw a downtick there from last quarter. Is that just some softness or some mix relative just due to timing in terms of, like, election-related pauses? Are we kind of expecting to see that trend or that demand come back in the coming quarters? Yeah, we talked about this in the quarters coming up to this. In general, a change in administration is good from a demand perspective because any type of change in administration brings new priorities. New priorities bring new opportunities for IT. In the lead-up to the election and the immediate aftermath where new people are getting in position, there's always a softer booking. As you know, our bookings were strong. Our trailing 12-month bookings in U.S. Federal continue to be well over 100%. We certainly can weather this transition period. Yes, that's really the reason for the bookings. It's not where we see demand going. In fact, there's a good alignment in demand right now of where we offer services and the priorities of the new administration, particularly from an IT perspective. Okay, perfect. If I could just put one last quick question. I know you guys were able to improve your margins as well, and I know you guys have talked about cutting back some discretionary spend costs. Are you kind of expecting that to come back as travel and such related costs kind of continue to come back, like, throughout FY 2021? Thanks. Yes, yes, you are correct. We did prioritize margins and make sure that we were very careful as we entered and weathered this pandemic period. We do expect there will be return of some, but not all of those expenses, and we're actively working to make sure that doesn't occur as we exit the pandemic. Certain things you want to return, like some of the higher-end expenses, some of the training expenses, and even some of the working from the office in proximity to our clients, some of those expenses will return. There's plenty of margin expansion opportunities to counter that from the mix of managed services and IP, specifically opportunities in certain geographies to bring them back to the CGI historical models, and then integration of some of these new mergers. You heard that some of our uptick this quarter was through some of those successful, and as we continue to merge operations in, we get the benefit of scale and the benefits of the CGI model. There's plenty of margin expansion opportunities. Yes, there will be a return of some of those expenses as we continue to grow, and hopefully soon exit the pandemic period we're in. Okay, perfect. Thanks so much for taking my question. Sure. Next question comes from Paul Treiber with RBC Capital Markets. Paul, thanks so much, and good morning. I just want to follow up on the margin question. Margins did hit a record high this quarter, and I think even when you look back, that includes when you look back to the pre-Logica days. Putting some numbers around it, is there a structural permanent increase in margin hit here? Should we expect 16% EBIT margins going forward? Or do you think that it probably dips a little bit below that when some of those costs come back in? Yeah. Well, thanks for noticing that it was a very strong margin quarter. Again, that was purposeful as we prioritized the margin side to make sure we preserve and expand shareholder value. Yeah, I think we would expect, in certain geographies, as the expenses return and growth returns, we will expect to see a little bit of a dip on the margin. However, your other comment about is some of this structural, yes, that is what we're working on. We learned something about going through this period that I think will allow us to continue, given the use of collaboration software and other activities, that we'll be able to preserve some of those savings and make those permanent in the model. Like I said on the earlier question, there's plenty of margin expansion opportunities. You can see some of the geographies that now have stabilized their margin, but they're not near where we believe they can and should be returning to. I just want to ask a big-picture question on acquisition strategy here. Over the last couple of years, there's been several large deals in the IT services space. Obviously, you passed on them. It looks like there's another potential large deal with Atos looking at DXC. Generally speaking, how do you look at the priority or prioritize between large transformative acquisitions versus tuck-ins? You mentioned in a discipline, how do you look at the risk profile for large acquisitions? I imagine the potential reward could be high, but then also the risks are higher as well. Yeah. Well, as far as prioritizing, we want to and believe we can do both. The strategy of the metro market tuck-ins has been highly successful in each of the regions we've done them in. That continues to be a prong of our strategy. The transformational, absolutely, if we're going to meet our aspiration of doubling the company, that continues to be on the path and in the priority list. As we look at those transactions, though, we're mainly looking for that cultural fit. Cultural fit for us, remember, is the type of work they're doing, the type of clients that they have, and will that mesh with the overall CGI model? What we don't want to do is merge with a company that changes that culture and that path that we're on. That's the main reason that we pass on some of these, and it's also the main reason we have an expanding list that we will be going after. This consolidation is still at the beginning stages. My last question, just on culture, when you look at the IT services market in general, do you see a lot of the competitors out there with a similar culture to you, or is it the minority of competitors have a similar culture? It's a mix. You see actually, I think that the mix is broadening as different providers decide where they want to play as the industry accelerates towards digital transformation and where each player wants to continue. What I can say is we want to be that end-to-end provider for our enterprise clients. That's the piece of the market that we're playing in. Great. Thanks for taking my questions. Yep. Next question comes from Matt O'Neill with Goldman Sachs. Yes. Hi, good morning, and thanks, gentlemen, for taking my question. It seems like a lot of consistent themes around both the sort of best ever margins and the potential for those to come back down a little bit. As well as the kind of five- to seven -year doubling, the M&A horizon, as well as, of course, the material share repurchase announced. With many of those out of the way, I was hoping maybe we could dig in a little bit more. You mentioned a little bit of an air pocket around bookings when a new administration comes in, and then ultimately that new administration generally represents a positive, as there's probably a lot of change required on the federal side. Is there any historical precedent that you could point us to as far as the sort of duration of that air pocket and magnitude? Is it a quarter or two? You expect a little bit of softness on the U.S. Federal side before then things ramp back up to and above maybe where they were before, or anything to point to there? Thanks for the question. It's typically no more than a quarter or so just to get the new politicals in their positions. That's coupled with usually a 100-day plan where those same politicals are trying to get some things done quickly. Usually it's no more than a quarter. As I mentioned, there is a nice alignment with our focus. We do believe that the new administration's IT priorities will be in the areas of health, environment, Veterans Affairs, National Security, and we're well-positioned with both vehicles and opportunities in those areas. Of course, technology, it's going to be cloud, data, and artificial intelligence with some 5G. Just as an example, they've come in and initially said they're going to pledge a CAD 10 billion increase in cyber in exactly some of the areas we already are. There'll be a little bit of that transition, but the historical is that we do very well in that environment. That's really helpful. Would it be safe to say that the new administration, I think the word digital's come up on this call fairly frequently already. Does there seem to be more inclination that it's going to push all things on the Federal side incrementally more digital? It seems a bit of an inevitability, but is that a safe assumption? I think that's a safe assumption, yes. All right. Thank you. I'll hop back in the queue. Thanks, Matt. Next question comes from Paul Steep with Scotia Capital. Hey, good morning. George, can you, on digital transformation, maybe remind us on the size of the opportunity, either within the business, however you might want to categorize it, and then maybe any gating factors that you're looking at to allow CGI to go even faster against that opportunity? I've got one quick clarification. Thanks. Yep. Sure. Well, to take your last question first, the gating factor really is just making sure that we get the offers in front of the customers and engage with them. In some ways, that's more challenging in a COVID remote environment. In other ways, what we've learned is, we've learned ways to do that collaboration in a very elegant way, given our prior relationships, and I mentioned some of that. It really is a matter of getting the right people in front, and that's why I mentioned some of the investments in our people, in the training, in the hiring, particularly around business engineering, business development, and investments in our intellectual property, because that's another one that can help accelerate some of that digital transformation and get us with those clients faster. That's really the answer on the gating. I think it answers probably the first part of your question as well. These engagements, from a size perspective, what we're seeing right now, point in time, now maybe that will change, but right now, we're still in the middle of a pandemic. Every company's doing this a little bit differently. Some of them are doing it in phases or waves. Some are going all in and some somewhere in between. We predicted this. We talked about this. As we move closer to exiting the pandemic, what we said is, the rebounds will happen differently by industry, and the rebounds will happen differently by company within those industry. Again, is why proximity is so important, because you've got to know and meet them where they are. Maybe that gives you the more color or less color than you were looking for, but that's really what we're seeing right now, Paul. That's helpful. The clarification is just with regards to large transformational acquisitions, can you maybe characterize how you're thinking about those versus the past? Is there a desire to, for example, avoid vendors that might be categorized as having a larger book of legacy infrastructure that would just be off the table, and thus, shouldn't be an area investors should think that CGI has any great interest in? Thanks, guys. No, thanks for the question. No, I don't think we would limit ourselves in any way, and we're not. What's important for us on a digital transformation is to be part of all elements of it. What we don't want to do is only do the legacy, or quite frankly, only do some of the smaller new and miss out on the modernization required. We really want to play on both sides, and that's certainly what we consult to our clients and where possible, urge them to think about this in the biggest way. That's what will help them be successful fastest and certainly, is where we're the best partner to them. I would never say we wouldn't play on one side or the other, but not exclusively, because that's where you get pigeonholed within a client. Thank you. Next question comes from Daniel Chan with TD Securities. Hi. Thanks for taking my questions. Just to expand on some of these questions on the infrastructure and transformational acquisitions, this DXC and Atos potential combination, would that have any impact on the competitive environment for you? No, thanks for the question, and it does play to that infrastructure side of the house. That's where they play. Again, if they want to do that from an exclusive basis, that's not where we're playing. We're playing on the end-to-end. I think something like that always changes the dynamic somewhat, but we're sticking to our end-to-end, and it's having good results with our clients. Okay. Now that Brexit is largely over, does that open the floodgates on some of the deals that maybe have been pent up or been held back or delayed over the last few years? Should we expect some increasing opportunities, not just in the U.K. but also across the E.U.? Yeah, I think we will see that on a gradual basis. I would like to say that COVID is past us, but in many of the countries that we are working in, that is shutdowns, et cetera, are still occurring. We do think that reacting differently. I thought you said COVID. I apologize. That is good. I am glad you did not think COVID was over. Yes. Brexit being past us is certainly helpful. Most of the clients we work with had that better prepared in their plans. I think the reason I just immediately thought of COVID is that in the U.K., of course, we are still in a shutdown period, that is probably more of a damper on things point in time than Brexit. As COVID abates and then Brexit is past us, yes, I think there will be some pent-up demand that comes through in the U.K. and other places. I apologize. That's great. Thank you. Next question comes from Ramsey El-Assal with Barclays. Hi, guys. This is Ben Budish on for Ramsey. I'd like to apologize in advance for asking maybe the 100th question on margins and M&A, perhaps I could ask it a bit of a different way. I think in your prepared remarks, you talked about with the metro market strategy, in some cases, you see this as being margin additive. I think for a lot of us looking at some of your large IT services peers, we tend to see them do more smaller acquisitions that tend to be growth accretive and margins dilutive. I'm not sure if I perhaps misunderstood what you were mentioning earlier, could you maybe discuss, at least in the context of the metro market strategy, how you balance looking for targets that either add growth or depth in that market, and how that all plays out? Yeah. That's a great question. When we buy and merge something into the CGI portfolio, in almost all cases, the margin is lower than the CGI margins. Day one, it's dilutive, but then we bring that up to the CGI margins. Not necessarily above the CGI margins, because you're right, it really is a catalyst for growth, but we bring them back up to the margins of CGI. Over time, that's why you see some of that. As we buy some of the larger metro market mergers, there's a little bit of a dilution, then it comes back. That's why I highlighted that, and that's why François did as well in the prepared remarks. Okay. I see. That makes sense. Thank you. If I could ask one more. We've seen a lot of activity lately with, again, with your peers talking about their cloud businesses and making more investments, and that just being a really attractive growth avenue. I just wonder if you could, for CGI, help us size up- Yeah Get a sense of how big that is for you guys and what you're doing there. Yeah. Thank you. Thanks for the question. I highlighted some of the examples and just a handful of the examples of what we're seeing in the systems integrations space. Yes, a lot of it is assisting in helping our clients in their application migration to the cloud. We're running towards that. We actually have some methodologies and tools that we built to assist our clients in that. We start with actually consulting with our clients on how and where and when to use the cloud and how to make that happen. We'll manage that for them soup to nuts. The partnerships with the various cloud providers is extremely important. I mentioned we're reinvigorating that. This is really all the cloud providers. It's Microsoft, it's Google, it's Amazon, it's Oracle, and we have examples and projects with each of them ongoing as we speak. Really, it's getting closer to them is important. It's a big opportunity for our clients and therefore for CGI. Thanks so much for taking my questions. Next question comes from Stephanie Price with CIBC. Hi, good morning. Hi, Stephanie. Just wondering if you could talk a little bit about what you are seeing in terms of project delivery, just given the new phase of lockdown that are in certain regions. I think you mentioned the U.K. a minute ago. Yeah. The type of project engagements, what I would say is that this wave of pandemic shutdowns, really our clients are looking at them a bit differently. They've kind of already have a better way of working. They're more prepared for this, we're actually seeing more strategic project starts and engagements. It's just kind of the new way of doing business. They're prepared, they've built into their plans. Even though we still have only about 11% of our people working from an office or a client site with the proper precautions, we're seeing much more of these new starts. I think some of that is based on the experience they've had and the positive experience they had in delivering some of the ongoing projects that they didn't stop or delay, and it's giving them more confidence to start things back up. Okay. Maybe just to follow up, I was wondering if you could talk a little bit about the closure rates you're seeing for the large deals versus the small deals, and what sort of trends you're seeing around those larger deals. Yeah. We're actually seeing more activity on the larger deals and willingness to close those larger deals. I think the surprising part, and that's why I mention it in the prepared remarks, that we're also seeing this on the smaller side. We're seeing both now. We thought it was going to move more to just those larger deals driven by cost savings. We're actually seeing a little bit of both. I wouldn't say that the larger deals are stopping in any way, even with this next wave of shutdowns. Great. Thank you very much. Next question comes from Robert Young with Canaccord Genuity. Hi, good morning. I just wanted to clarify something said earlier. You said you'd seen strong renewals, sometimes seen scope increases, driven by digital. I think it was Thanos' question, was asking about shift more towards digital. You'd said that managed services was mixing in digital. Yeah. I got you said that you'd commented on that earlier. I'd taken your comments earlier to reference renewals. Are you seeing managed service scope increase during the project, or is this something that's happening at the renewal point? A little of both. It's a little of both. It's more pronounced, if you will, at renewal time. I'll remind you, renewal time can happen anytime. We can do an early renewal to put that in. The reason I say it that way is you want to make sure you get the contract and the mechanisms correct on service level agreements, et cetera. We're looking at that as we speak. Some of the renewals that we're doing where it's actually driven by a need to digitize. Having said that, we wrap in the managed services in some ways to help fund it. Right now, it's very interesting in a couple of these deals, getting in-year savings, in year being 2021, getting some savings up front, but then also being able to fund and accelerate a digital transformation. That's a nice value proposition for our clients. We have the balance sheet and the wherewithal to do just that. That's what I mean by that, and that's pretty exciting. Great. Would you normally see shorter terms consulting projects like front-end professional services turning into managed services? Is some of that sort of front-end work being pulled into these larger deals? Is that better for margins? Yeah. Well, that is better for margins, and we have talked about that. Some of those systems integration and consulting projects can lead to bigger opportunities. The big reason for that is not necessarily the contract just turns into that. The relationship turns into that. That client intimacy, backed up by the other experts and expertise that we have, allows for that. Yes, that's definitely a margin driver because you have a better utilization rate and it's a longer period of time, and therefore, a lower cost of sales over time. Okay. Thanks. Yep. Once again, to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. Next question comes from Howard Leung with Heritage. Good morning. Hi, Howard. I just wanted to touch on kind of the SG&A savings that the others have asked about and focus on the lease side. I think you've made some comments about the importance of the proximity model to CGI. I guess at the same time, you've probably thought about what it's going to look like, I guess, for the offices after the vaccinations are over. What's kind of your thoughts on that? I also noticed last year you guys took some write-downs on the leases. There were some lease modifications, I think, made to last year's statements. Just kind of give us the thinking of how many days people are going to come back to the office and that kind of stuff. Yeah. No, it's a great question. As you might expect, this is exactly what we're thinking about and talking about. We're not going to abandon our proximity model, and we do believe there's benefits to being in the office for purposes of training, bringing others along, the creativity that comes out of that, and the interaction with our clients having space to do that. Having said that, I think the office of the past is not necessarily going to be the office of the future. We're looking at smaller spaces, more spaces in different parts of cities. All of that is on the table as we go through that. That will take some time to convert. You'll see some of the costs returning, but over time, we'll certainly be optimizing that for our clients and for our business. Right. It's more like as the lease rolls off, you might look at other options at that point. Correct. Right. Just another question I wanted to turn to is the renewal rates. You disclosed there 95%, which is pretty strong. Yeah. Is that by revenue or by customer count? What was it like, I guess, pre-COVID? It's by revenue, and we've been pretty consistent in the 90s. Was it always over 95%? No. It's always been in the 90s. We tend to have a very good, strong relationship. I've mentioned two clients. We have over 20-year relationships. That's pretty common with CGI. That's part of the ownership model and the value system and how we approach our relationships. I highlighted it because it's giving us that opportunity to do the add-on services. That's really why I highlighted it in the remarks today. Right. I guess it might correlate with, if IP becomes a bigger part of your revenue, you might expect that renewal rate to increase? Well, IP is something we haven't talked as much about, but we're making some pretty nice investments in our intellectual property right now. Essentially repurposing them to be more business platforms as a service, componentization of all of our flagship IP, specifically in government and financial services, which are giving us co-creation opportunities for that IP. IP then becomes an accelerator, both for our clients' business, but also for our business. We're also packaging our IP from across CGI in certain industries, adding data intelligence into these application suites, and also intelligent automation in areas like health, utilities, and again, financial services. We're doing some exciting work with the IP to make them a driver of acceleration for our business, but of course, first for our clients' business. Okay, great. Thanks so much. I'll pass the line. Sure. Thank you everyone for being with us today on the call, and we look forward to speaking to you at the end of next quarter. Thank you. Thank you. And this concludes today's conference call. You may now disconnect.