Greetings, and welcome to Nutrien 2022 first quarter earnings call. At this time, all participants are in a listen-only mode. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. I would now like to turn the conference over to Jeff Holzman, Vice President of Investor Relations. Thank you. Please go ahead. Thank you, operator. Good morning, and welcome to Nutrien's First Quarter 2022 Conference Call. As we conduct this call, various statements that we make about future expectations, plans, and prospects contain forward-looking information. Certain material assumptions were applied in making these conclusions and forecasts. Therefore, actual results could differ materially from those contained in our forward-looking information. Additional information about these factors and assumptions are contained in our current quarterly report to shareholders, as well as our most recent annual report, MD&A, and annual information form filed with Canadian and U.S. securities commissions. I will now turn the call over to Ken Seitz, Interim President and CEO, and Pedro Farah, our CFO, for opening comments before we take your questions. Thanks, Jeff. Good morning, and welcome to Nutrien's first quarter earnings call. Before we get into the discussion of our results and outlook, I would like to express our thoughts and sympathies to all those that have been impacted by the conflict in Ukraine. We see the significant toll it has taken on the people in Ukraine, and it hits close to home for many of our employees, customers, and other stakeholders that have family and friends in the region. The conflict has also compounded supply challenges that have contributed to higher commodity prices and escalated concerns for global food security. Russia and Ukraine account for over 20% of the global exports for many agriculture and fertilizer commodities, and there's no simple or fast solution to overcome this level of supply disruption. As the world's largest fertilizer producer and retailer of crop inputs, Nutrien has taken several actions to help our customers secure the products they need. In potash, we are expanding production capability to approximately 15 million tons in 2022, an increase of 1 million tons compared to our initial expectations. This represents a nearly 20% increase compared to 2020 and accounts for more than 70% of global potash production added during this time. We have expanded our nitrogen production capacity by nearly 1 million tons since the beginning of 2018 and are in the process of adding an additional 0.5 million tons over the next few years while improving the carbon footprint of our facilities. Our retail business operates in seven countries across North America, South America, and Australia. These are key agriculture regions that will be called on to sustainably increase crop production, and our team of 3,900 crop consultants work every day to provide innovative products and solutions that meet the needs of our grower customers. I'm extremely proud of how our people have stepped up across the organization as we respond to this critical time for global agriculture and do so in a manner that does not compromise our core values of safety and integrity. Now turning to our Q1 results and outlook. We delivered higher earnings across each of our business units due to the strength of the market fundamentals, advantaged position of our assets, and solid execution by our people. The year-over-year growth in earnings was further supported by recent strategic capital allocation decisions that included expanding our production capabilities and increasing the size of share buybacks over the past two quarters. Nutrien Ag Solutions delivered record first quarter adjusted EBITDA of $240 million, despite a delayed start to the spring season in North America. Our per ton crop nutrient margins remained strong due to the timing of procurement in a rising price environment and continued growth in our proprietary nutritional products. We delivered higher crop protection gross margins as growers engaged early to purchase product ahead of the spring season. We strategically procured inventory of certain products in anticipation of tight global supply, and our margins in Q1 reflect this effort. Potash delivered $1.4 billion in adjusted EBITDA, supported by higher realized prices. Global demand was strong as buyers looked to secure product in the midst of supply uncertainty from Belarus and Russia. We increased offshore potash sales volumes by 8% compared to the previous year. However, shipments were impacted by rail service interruptions during the quarter. North American sales volumes were impacted by a delayed start to the spring season and were down compared to last year's very strong first quarter. In nitrogen, we generated adjusted EBITDA of $1 billion, driven by higher realized prices and the cost-advantaged position of our assets. We experienced some unplanned outages during the quarter, and sales volumes were also impacted by a slow start to the spring season. Phosphate delivered record adjusted EBITDA of $239 million as higher sales prices more than offset the large increase in ammonia and sulfur input costs. Turning to the outlook, global grain and oilseed inventories were well below historical average levels entering 2022, and the conflict in Ukraine has led to further tightening of supplies. Corn, soybean, and wheat futures prices are 50%-90% above the 10-year average and are trading at elevated levels on a multi-year basis. Prospective crop margins are significantly above historical average levels. As the increase in revenues from higher crop prices has more than exceeded the projected increase in input costs. Weather permitting, we expect planted acreage to increase in the key agriculture regions in which we operate, with the strong incentives for growers to maximize production. The North American spring planting season is behind the historical average pace, but there is still time to get the crop in the ground, and our retail network is well-positioned to deliver in a compressed season. We are seeing strong demand in the regions where planting has progressed and have all-time high customer prepayments on account, which is a good indicator of grower intent. Financial sanctions and other restrictions imposed on Russia and Belarus have constrained potash supply, with minimal exports from this region reported since early March. These two countries represent approximately 40% of global potash exports, and there is limited availability of production capacity in other regions to help fill this supply gap. Therefore, we expect global potash shipments will decline to between 60 and 65 million tons in 2022, and we assume a wider than normal range given the level of supply uncertainty from Eastern Europe. Nutrien expects to ship record potash volumes between 14.5-15.1 million tons, with most of the growth projected in offshore markets. We expect nitrogen markets to remain strong through 2022 due to lower Russian exports and volatile European gas prices that are currently setting the floor for ammonia and urea prices. Chinese urea exports have been restricted in the first half of 2022, and we believe there is potential for restrictions in the second half if the government intends on maintaining the current discount for Chinese domestic prices compared to other global markets. We are discussing these supply challenges in the context of 2022. However, we believe these issues could extend well beyond this year. Sanctions on Russia and Belarus have the potential to create more lasting changes to global trade patterns as customers prioritize reliability of supply. We anticipate volatility in global energy prices due to greater supply uncertainty from Russia, and we expect some delays in the development of a new capacity from this region as access to financing, equipment, and other resources becomes more challenging. We will closely monitor global market developments as we assess opportunities to increase our potash production capability beyond 15 million tons. Increasing production on a sustained basis requires opening up new ground, installing additional equipment and infrastructure, hiring more people, and securing outbound logistics. These are decisions that require careful planning as they have long-term impacts on our operations and our people. We intend to provide more details at our virtual investor update meeting on June 9th. I will now turn it over to Pedro to review how we expect these market conditions to impact our 2022 guidance and our approach to capital allocation going forward. Pedro? Thanks, Ken. Given the significant changes in market fundamentals, we have increased our 2022 adjusted EBITDA guidance to $14.5 billion-$16.5 billion. At the midpoint, this represents a nearly 50% increase from our initial full-year guidance in February. We expect earnings to be fairly evenly split between the first and second half of the year, with the pace of planting and crop development likely to have some impact on the timing of earnings between quarters. We are projecting retail adjusted EBITDA between $1.8 billion and $1.9 billion, as crop nutrient and crop protection margins are expected to be stronger than previously anticipated. Crop prices have risen materially since the beginning of the year, and we expect growers will be incentivized to maximize yields, which typically contributes to strong in-season demand for crop protection and specialty nutritional products. Similarly, similar to previous years, we expect 60%-65% of retail's adjusted EBITDA will be generated in the second quarter. We significantly increased our potash adjusted EBITDA guidance due to the expectation for higher realized prices and increased sales volumes. Cost of goods sold per ton are expected to increase in 2022 due primarily to higher royalties, which are directly tied to selling prices. Excluding the impact of royalties, natural gas, and carbon taxes, we expect controllable cash costs will be comparable with the previous years as higher production volumes offset inflation. Our increase in nitrogen adjusted EBITDA guidance reflects higher global benchmark prices and a very competitive cost position compared to producers in Europe. We lowered our nitrogen sales volume expectation due to the plant outages that occurred in Q1. We are taking a number of actions to enhance plant reliability, including incremental investments to protect our sites from severe weather events and expect higher operating rates over the remainder of 2022. We expect to generate $10.5 billion-$11 billion in cash from operating activities, assuming a cash conversion ratio of approximately 70% at the midpoint of our 2022 adjusted EBITDA guidance range. This represents a slightly lower conversion rate that we assumed in February, as the increase in input prices is expected to translate into greater working capital requirements in this period. The majority of our cash flow is expected to be generated in the second and the fourth quarters due to the seasonal working capital profile of retail. Our priorities for investment capital remain very consistent with our long-term strategy and what we communicated in February. However, given the potential for increased cash flow, we are evaluating the viability to accelerate a few high return growth opportunities. We announced a 1 million ton increase to our potash production capability in March, which will require small incremental capital investments for mine-facing equipment and mine development. As Ken already mentioned, we are closely looking at the potential to further ramp our potash production capability above 15 million tons. We are evaluating opportunities across our nitrogen business that would enhance the product mix and improve the environmental footprint of our facilities, including expanding our leading low-carbon ammonia position. In retail, there is strong pipeline of acquisition opportunities in Brazil and the U.S., and we will maintain disciplined approach as we evaluate these opportunities. In terms of capital, in terms of investment capital, our focus is on initiatives that enhance our proprietary product business and digital capabilities, which are key drivers of retail organic growth. We committed to a minimum of $2 billion in share repurchases in 2022, and year to date, we have allocated nearly $740 million repurchasing approximately 9 million shares at an average price of around $81 per share. Given the strength of our projected cash flow, we believe there is potential for additional shareholder returns as the year progresses. We will provide a more in-depth update on our capital allocation plans at the investor update meeting on June ninth. I will now pass it back to Ken for final comments. Thanks, Pedro. The importance of global agriculture to help sustainably feed a growing world has never been clearer. It is increasingly apparent that the supply issues currently impacting agriculture and fertilizer markets could last well beyond 2022. Nutrien is responding in the near term by utilizing the full extent of our integrated sustainable agriculture platform to provide customers with the products they need for the upcoming growing season. We are thoroughly evaluating our longer-term plans to ensure we deliver the greatest value for all our stakeholders. I'm joined today by members of our leadership team, and we would be happy to take your questions. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, please do so by pressing star one on your phone. Again, the star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. Please note to limit yourself to one question. If you have additional questions, you may press star one again, and we will try to address those at the end of the presentation if time permits. Please stand by while we compile the Q&A roster. Your first question is from the line of Andrew Wong with RBC Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hey, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. The sanctions on Belarus and Russia, they're probably the biggest change that we've seen in the potash market structure, since the breakup of BPC, you know, almost 10 years ago. These effects seem to be relatively long-lasting. Can you just talk about how the Belarus-Russia situation changes your longer-term view on the market? I'd be curious, Ken, you had a pretty good seat at Canpotex to kind of see some of the market changes over the past, you know, five, 10 years. I'd be curious your thoughts on where we are going forward. Thanks. Yeah. Thanks, Andrew. Yeah. Absolutely, it is the case that we watch this terrible tragedy unfolds in Eastern Europe. Thinking about you know, people in the region every day, you know, we are watching the impacts that sanctions are having first, as you mentioned, on Belarus and Russia as well. While potash itself is not sanctioned in Russia, certainly the enabling activities for export of anything out of Russia at the moment are challenged, whether it's banking or shipping or insurance and so on. Then of course, with Belarus, the sanctions were there prior to this conflict, and having really no access to Tidewater, being shut off from the ports in Lithuania. As these things have unfolded, as you say, Andrew, we're looking at duration and how long this might last, you know, and the longer-term implications for potash. We're coming to the conclusion, as we said in opening remarks, that these could last well beyond 2022 and hence are looking at our own capabilities accordingly. I'll hand it over to Jason Newton, our Chief Economist, to just provide a little more color. Yeah. Good morning, Andrew. I think in terms of overall supply-demand impact, certainly there's a really large potential for supply constraints in 2022 just given as Ken mentioned the restrictions on Belarusian shipment to Tidewater and all the different sanctions impacting Russian production. In terms of quantifying the impact, if we compare to the Sort of base operational capability in Belarus is around 13 million tons, operational capability in Russia around 15 million tons. We think Belarusian supplies will be down around 6-8 million tons this year, in Russia in the range of 2-6 million tons this year. Going forward, it will take some time to rebuild those export capabilities. We believe Belarus will continue to be more most restricted going forward as they have the need to rebuild or build port capacity, which takes time, especially in the face of sanctions. We also know that that region makes up about 60%-70% of the capacity additions that we expect to come forward over the next five years. We believe those will also be delayed going forward. In any case, we have a tighter supply demand outlook going forward than we would have previously. Yeah. Thanks, Jason. Maybe just Andrew, then finally, your question about Canpotex and that vantage point. You know, it is the case that really growers around the world with what's happened with commodity prices are incented to lay down appropriate crop nutrients. You layer on that some of the challenges that Jason just described, and you can imagine that Canpotex their phones are ringing as people look for alternative sources of supply. Could it be that global trade routes are disrupted? I think we're seeing that today, but suffice it to say that certainly from a global demand perspective, Canpotex you know, has homes for potash and for increased levels of potash. That's what's driving, as we said in our open comments, us looking at the potential to accelerate our ramp-up of potash production. Your next question is from the line of Christopher Parkinson with Mizuho Securities. Please go ahead. Just a quick corollary of that question. Just given the outlook and the potential longevity of the, let's say, the current situation and the shortfall, and, you know, even if growers in certain regions, you know, skip applications, presumably nutrients are still being removed from the soil on an annualized basis. You know, there are a lot of things to consider. A very simple question. You know, what will it take for you to eventually make a decision to, you know, ramp even further? I understand obviously there are economic considerations, longevity, so on and so forth. The remainder of that question will be, I mean, who else even has the capacity to make a dent in that shortfall between 2022 and 2024? Is there anybody else that could even remotely make a dent in that, from your perspective? Thank you. Great. Thanks, Chris. Well, I'll start with the second question and just say that, no, it is going to be a challenge if we believe these supply challenges, you know, are going to persist through 2022 and into 2023. You know, if there was additional capacity to put in the market, it would already be there because the incentives are certainly there for a producer to produce. We'll also say that some of the new volumes that would have been coming to the market are out of that region, out of Russia, and that's whether it's Uralkali or Belarus with their Petrikov Project. We can imagine that those projects are also challenged today. You know, it's if we look at the ability to flex production, a lot of it resides with Nutrien. Hence, over the last two years, 70% of the new production that's come to the market has been from Nutrien and our ability to add 20% to our own production volumes over the last two years. With respect to your question, what does it take to ramp further? Well, of course, we're looking at that right now, but it goes back to just us assessing the duration of this impact and what it will actually the impact on the market in terms of trade patterns and ultimately restrictions potentially to certain parts of the world. We know that's going to happen this year, hence our 60-65 million ton guidance range, where we expect there will be demand rationing. Much different to demand destruction, but demand rationing. You know, there is an acceleration case for our volumes. We're looking at that today. We will have more to talk about at our Investor Day on June 9th. L ooking at that accelerated case in the context of a drawn-out challenges from production from Eastern Europe. Your next question is from Adam Samuelson with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Yes, thanks. Good morning, everyone. Maybe just continuing on that same line of questioning, could you just talk about maybe internally and within Canpotex and in the broader North American logistics system where you see kind of the bigger bottlenecks to increasing capacity? Obviously, there's about 3 million tons of hoisting and processing capacity that's still idled, as Vanscoy has a bunch of it and some of the other mines as well. As you think about beyond that, whether it's ports, whether it's rail cars, whether you think it's big constraints around new mining machines, just help us think about what the key bottlenecks from a time perspective would be, and where the bigger capital kind of requirements would come from, to think about the 3 million tons that you have still potential internally built and even beyond that. Great. Thanks, Adam. You know, it's a great question because we obviously look at this, you know, our capacities, not just at the mines, but right through to the discharge ports for the customer. Where are the bottlenecks? I mean, today, we would say that we're looking very closely at long lead time items from a procurement perspective. That would be things like mining machines, which, you know, in order to accelerate a ramp-up, we would need to put mining machines on order. You know, the downstream of that, we would say that, you know, with conveyance, we have to put in place. The rest of it, we have built that capacity exactly as you say, you know. Cory mine and our other mines where we have the infrastructure in place. We have the 12 shaft sunk, and we have mill capacity to ramp up production as well. Capital associated with production down at the mine, but downstream of the mining machine is immaterial. As we look beyond the mine gate and downstream from there, yes, it's true that you know, cycle times are gonna require more rail cars, and we're going to require port capacity. The good thing is that Canpotex has invested at their Neptune facility, Portland facility and our East Coast facility in New Brunswick, which gives them sufficient port capacity to today to ramp up. It really becomes a discussion about ordering rail cars, which we can do. I would say with respect to our North American business distribution, we feel very well positioned there. We have our Hammond facility. We have our over 300 warehouses across North America and again, rail cars to get it there. You know, as we ramp up production, North American supply chain intact, we'll be looking to offshore. Via Canpotex, we certainly see a path there. Your next question is from the line of Joel Jackson with BMO Capital Markets. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, Ken and everyone. I had a couple questions or two. It's a two-parter. Your Canpotex partner gave some guidance overnight that they're expecting about a $50 a ton realized price increase in Q2 sequentially versus Q1. You obviously have a lot of pricing that's linked together. First I wanted to see, is that kind of what you're guiding to as well in Q2? As a second part of that, in your midpoint guidance for EBITDA for the year, are you assuming that current potash prices stay where they are for the year, or what are you assuming in the base case? Thanks. With respect to you know, our margins compared to what Mosaic might have said on their call, I mean, I think it's fair to say that out of Canpotex you can expect something similar. You know, in North America, we would go our own ways and wouldn't talk about that because that's confidential. Yeah, I think generally, Joel, you can say that it would be similar. With respect to our pricing assumptions and what we're saying for you know, the midpoint of EBITDA guidance, I'll hand it over to Jason Newton. Good morning Joel. I think you've probably read fairly closely into where the midpoint of the guidance would be reflected based on prices remaining relatively in line with where current prices are. Your next question is from the line of Jacob Bout with CIBC. Please go ahead. Good morning. Going back to late 2008, 2009, we used to talk about being able to skip a year for potash application. What is your sense of the amount of potash in soils in your key markets like U.S., Brazil, China and India versus historical? Maybe you can comment on where you see inventory levels right now in those key markets as well. Great. Thanks, Jacob. Well, you know, I would say that, given the price of commodities and certainly the most recent price increases, growers have incentive to maximize yield. As such, you know, we would say that nutrients and crop oils, and then depending on region, would be sort of at average to below average levels. Again, we would say that growers are heavily incentivized today to lay down the appropriate crop nutrients. With respect to inventories, also an important question, Jacob, and we would say that today entering the year, inventory levels are sort of at average or below average historical levels. It is the case now, and certainly it's true for potash, with the North American spring season delayed, you know, we still have plenty of time to get that crop in the ground, obviously. We expect those inventory levels to come down. That's true internationally as well. If we look at China, Southeast Asia and Brazil entering the year with reasonable inventories, but expecting those to come down and for potash, especially true given that we are just now starting to see the impact of this conflict in Ukraine. Obviously Russia was delivering potash out of the region up until the latter part of February. Again, now some of these challenges that are persisting. We expect inventories certainly for potash to come down and be pressured then for the balance of 2022. Your next question is from Vincent Andrews with Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Just a question on retail as it relates to, I guess, two things. One, how is retail gonna position itself for inventories at the end of the North American season? I'm kind of also, I guess, asking about how you think summer fill will progress in the different nutrients. If you could also help us with why crop protection margins you anticipate improving from here. Good. Yeah. Thank you, Vincent. Yes, I mean, with respect to inventories, that's something that we're watching very closely at the moment and watching planting progress throughout North America. We entered the season with inventories the way that we would in previous years, and as Jeff Tarsi keeps saying, intending to end the spring season with inventory levels low. But Jeff, can I pass it over to you for the discussion about inventories and crop protection margins? Sure, Ken, and good morning, Vincent. Yeah, I'd reiterate what Ken just said. I can't think of any year that I wouldn't go into that I wouldn't plan on trying to target myself to being near empty once we come into that June and July timeframe across all of my nutrients. Then obviously, once we get, you know, once we get into that July, August timeframe, we'll start positioning ourself again for, you know, what we anticipate to be another fall another strong fall market as well. Look, we try to position ourselves from an inventory standpoint in season. We always try to position ourself to being as close to empty as we can whether it's, you know, crop nutrients, seed or crop protection. I think your second question was in reference to our strong crop protection margins, and I guess I'll start off addressing that as that last fall, we anticipated that there would be a tremendous amount of supply constraints around numerous crop protection products. We started building our inventory last fall, anticipating that these supply constraints would be real coming into 2022. As we positioned ourselves early and built inventory in advance, and we built inventory at some pretty attractive cost positions as well. As you saw in the first quarter, we had a pretty significant improvement on crop protection. It was probably the highlight of our first quarter. I think we're about 400 basis points increase in margins there. A lot of that is, you know, we got some growers that are buying earlier as well, anticipating some of these shortages. Our people have done a good job of moving our cost up as our cost on those crop protection products have increased as well. We would expect to see that continue somewhat throughout the 2022 spring and into the second quarter. Your next question is from Ben Isaacson with Scotiabank. Please go ahead. Thank you very much, and good morning. I just wanna come back to the Russian potash situation. We're seeing Russian potash show up not just in India and China, but we've seen it come to the U.S., Europe, Brazil, Southeast Asia. Of course, while there was significant disruption to Russian fertilizer trade flow in March, can you talk about what trade flow looks like coming out of Russia over the last two, three, four weeks? Do you see Russian potash coming out at a rate of 50%, two-thirds, 75% of normal? I know you spoke about the year potentially being down 2-6 million tons, but can you just talk about what you're seeing right now in terms of what's coming out of the market? Thanks. Yeah. Thanks, Ben. Yes, good morning. We are seeing an impact, an on the ground impact at the moment, exports coming out of Russia. While unlike the Belarusians, perhaps the Russians do have some access to markets, an example of that would be rail into China, which we expect to continue through 2022, and that could be over the course of the year, maybe 1.5 million tons. You know, an example of certainly an outlet for the Russians. They have their own domestic demand, which they're satisfying. But I'd say at the moment, Ben, what we're seeing is an impact across export markets that the Russians need to access via Tidewater. About 0.5 million tons a month at the moment is what we're seeing. You know, whether that persists through 2022 remains to be seen. A s you say, in the last month or so, what are we seeing on the ground? That's what we're seeing. You know, that's helping to inform the ranges that Jason Newton talked about earlier. Your next question is from Michael Doumet with TD Securities. Please go ahead. Thanks. Another question around the potential to accelerate your ramp-up of potash production beyond the 15 million tons. You talked about some of the bottlenecks associated with bringing on additional production earlier in the call. Wondering, though, if you were to decide to move forward, can you talk about how quickly you could bring on additional production and how we should think about CapEx associated with incremental tonnage? Yeah. Thanks, Michael. Yes, I mean, again, you know, we're looking at that, all of this at the moment, and again, expect to talk about it in more detail at our Investor Day in June ninth. Suffice it to say that, you know, our ramp-up to 18 million tons, you know, we can bring it on in increments of production and increments of capital with off-ramps for some of this capital. You know, that's the path that we're plotting at the moment or testing to plot at the moment and testing our assumptions around all that. I'll just say that, you know, certainly, as we think about that profile for volume increases, we're talking in, you know, a few years, not decades or anything like that. With respect to the capital associated with it, again, we're looking at that, but I would say that given the off-ramps and capital as we move up our production volumes, it's not that it's immaterial, but it's certainly a highly economic production in the context of, you know, where we see the market potentially going, balance of 2022 and over to 2023. Your next question is from Steve Byrne with Bank of America. Please go ahead. Yes, thanks. I'd like to drill into the retail business here. Just curious what you're seeing in that business in terms of grower application rates so far this spring. Has there been much of a cutback in P& K application rates? Are growers using more of your variable rate technology to only put it down where they really need it? What's the magnitude of the drop there? Any comments about the sharp drop in NOLA urea? Is that just 'cause the channel doesn't need any more and thus it's kind of irrelevant? Great. Thanks, Steve. You know, with respect to the first question on retail, the short answer is no. The growers, again, given the backdrop and the ag fundamentals, there are strong incentives there. I'll start with Jeff Tarsi to provide some more color on that one. Then with respect to the question about nitrogen, we'll pass it over to Raef Sully. Jeff? Yeah, sure. Good morning, Steve. Yeah, to answer your question and follow up with Ken's comments there. Number one, you mentioned variable rate and, you know, Steve, we don't do really today, we don't do a lot of blanket rates of N, P and K. A lot of it or the majority of it is variable rate. Most all of our application equipment today is set up where we variable rate. As you well know, we do a lot of it. We do extensive soil testing and running that analysis through Waypoint Analytical to come back with a proper prescription for nutrient needs. From that standpoint, as Ken said, we haven't seen a cutback in rates. Obviously last fall, we had a tremendous run last fall, and that's probably what slowed some things up in the first quarter a bit. If I look back at those rates last fall, they were very strong rates. I think in the environment that we're in today, Steve, these growers are gonna give themselves every opportunity to maximize out on yield. We also think that once we get in season, we think our foliar nutritional products are gonna be at a very high demand, and we've really stepped up production in those areas as well because we think these growers will spoon feed this crop throughout the season. We've seen a lot of demand for our in-furrow type pop-up products as well, Steve. I think we're still in a very strong environment. You know, I'm like anybody else here. I'm ready to see this crop get put in the ground. It looks like next week, talking to our climatologist, looks very strong that we're gonna be able to make a lot of planting progress going into next week. We're anxious to get that started and get things going. I'll go back to you, Ken, on the urea question. Great. Thank you, Jeff. Raef, over to you. Thanks, Ken. Steve, look, let's differentiate between some short term occurrences in the market versus the overall supply and demand situation. If you think about all of the nitrogen products, ammonia, urea, UAN, global supply and demand, the global supply is tight. I think we'll see continued solid pricing through the rest of the year for all of those products. I think the problem with urea at the minute, of course, as my colleagues have mentioned this, is the slow start to the season. With crop pricing where it is, farmers are going to try and maximize yield here. They're not going to skimp on the nitrogen products. There's a latent demand there for it. We just need to see the seed grow in the ground, the season start, and then we'll see the product start moving, and we'll see a correction upwards to recent pricing. Your next question is from Jeffrey Zekauskas with JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Thanks very much. If it turns out that potash demand is 60-65 million tons for a couple of years, assuming that capacity from Russia and Belarus can come back online, what do you think demand would be after a period like that? Would we go back to 70 million tons or would it be more elevated? Secondly, why do you think the Chinese have constricted phosphate exports so much? They don't need to constrict it that much to supply more phosphate to their internal farmers. Yeah, great. Thanks, Jeff. I'll pass that one over to Jason Newton to provide some color on both the phosphate and the potash questions. Sure. Good morning, Jeff. On the potash side, if we look at where trended potash shipments would be this year, they're probably actually in line with where they were last year. We had a really strong year of demand. If we were unconstrained in terms of supply, we'd probably be in that 70 million ton range in 2022. Looking forward at 1.5-2 million tons per year, you're moving out to sort of the 74-75 million ton mark in the next four-five years, which I think regardless of what scenario unfolds, it's likely to continue to be a supply constrained environment in that period of time. We've looked at a number of scenarios and different ramp ups and different changes over the next four to five years. In most cases, you're getting back to the current trend type levels of demand in 2024, 2025, just given the supply constraints in the market. On the phosphate question, the Chinese government over the last year or so has definitely put a higher priority on domestic food production and food security and maintaining low fertilizer prices for domestic farmers. While they have definitely sufficient supplies, they exported 10 million tons of DAP and MAP in 2021. Still, we'd expect they'll export somewhere between 6-7 million tons of DAP and MAP this year. There's a big discount in the domestic market for both phosphate fertilizers and for urea versus where the international market is. As we look toward the second half of this year, that is something to watch. I think the government of China is likely to wanna continue to maintain affordable, low fertilizer prices for Chinese growers. With that disconnect between domestic prices and international prices, there may continue to be restrictions on exports just to keep domestic market disconnected. Your next question is from P.J. Juvekar with Citi. Please go ahead. Yes. Hi, good morning. First question on sort of the Chinese urea outlook. You know, historically, producers there in China would take advantage of higher global prices and export more. Are you seeing more discipline in China, or is it related to coal and environmental issues? Then second, a quick one on retail, in retail. Just on seed, your both sales and gross margins were down, which was a little surprising given that price cuts were up. Can you just shed some light on that? Thank you. Great. Thanks, P.J. Yeah, with respect to Chinese urea, I think it goes back to the question of domestic supply once again, where we've seen the Chinese shut in exports in favor of domestic market, and that's certainly, you know, for the first half of this year and could carry on to the second half. Jason, do you wanna provide some more color around Chinese urea? Then we'll head over to Jeff Tarsi to talk about retail seed sales. Sure. Good morning, P.J. Yeah, in terms of the urea situation, typically, and we've seen this over the last couple of years, there isn't a lot of excess supply in China in the first half of the year, anyway because it's the domestic use period. With the export restrictions in place, we believe that exports in the first half of the year will be less than 1 million tons. I think it was 300,000 tons for the first quarter of the year. The big reason for that is the export restrictions. The government's restricting the volumes of exports. Historically, when exports have been restricted in the first half, we've seen a strong movement of volumes to bonded warehouses in advance of the export restrictions being removed. May not see that as much this year because there are export inspections in place that are purposely delaying the time it takes to move product into those warehouses. It might even further delay the start of the export season in July. Jeff, over to you for a discussion about retail seed sales. Sure, P.J., thanks for the question. Look, on the seed side of things, obviously, the first quarter is a very quiet quarter for us, and it depends on really what the last two weeks of March do from a weather standpoint. I think we talked about it numerous times today that we got off to a slow start. So I have us about flat, just maybe slightly up the seed revenue for the quarter and slightly down on margins, maybe 50 basis points. That's all a timing issue, right now, P.J. I think once we get rolling into the season and start getting this crop planted, we'll see all of that pick up. You know, we had about a 50 basis point share increase in seed in North America last year. We, you know, we plan this year to maintain that share gain, and we have plans to grow organically in our seed business right significantly over the next five years. No concern right now, just mainly a timing issue, and just need to get the planters in the field. Thanks. Your next question is from Steve Hansen with Raymond James. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning, everyone. Two-part question on your export logistics for potash, if I may. First, outside of the short rail strike, I'm just curious if there's any limitations that you might have faced in the period on export volumes. They did improve modestly year-over-year, but we're still well below 2019 levels. Secondly, one of Canpotex's logistics partners has been talking recently about the potential to move potash via direct line haul straight to the U.S. Gulf for export to Brazil. Just curious if you think that plan has any merits, and what kind of infrastructure would be needed if that was the case? Thanks. Thanks, Steve. So with respect to export logistics and limitations via Canpotex, I mean, again, I'll just go back to, you know, sufficient port capacity and access to tidewater here in North America, and it becomes a question of rail. I think you're rightly pointing out that there were some rail disruptions in the first quarter of this year. There was some impacts from the CP strike. We were largely able to mitigate those impacts by favoring volumes that travel on the CN. We also somehow saw some, you know, there have been some other labor disruptions associated with COVID still and challenges with rail companies staffing from time to time, so we had a little bit of that. We had some weather-related events in the first quarter as well that made it a challenge to get to the West Coast with our potash. Now that said, first quarter, while the volumes were a little bit down compared to last year, we expect to fully recover those volumes in the balance of 2022. You know, we cope with these things every year, and yet, you know, we expect to recover the volumes. With respect to accessing the Gulf to transport volumes overseas, certainly these things are all possible. I think it's fair to say it becomes a question of cost. It's a long journey via rail. For us and our supply chain, we feel particularly advantaged today because we do have sufficient access to Tidewater, where today, you know, we can head west and to our Neptune facility in Canpotex's Neptune facility in Vancouver and then Portland as well. But the shorter answer is, yeah, if you can arrange the rail and you can get terminal facilities on the coast and then you get ships in a deep water port, yes, you know, you can transport potash. Your next question is from Michael Piken with Cleveland Research. Please go ahead. Yeah. Good morning. Wanted to talk about the nitrogen side of the business. If you could talk a little bit about, you know, just where you see India in terms of what they need in the coming months. If you could talk about how much capacity you think is offline in Europe right now. Moving forward, you know, where you see your Trinidad ops running throughout the year. Thanks. Great. Yes. Well, thank you. Yes, it is the case that we see some European volumes offline. We think, you know, for the quarter here, you know, maybe 6 million tons at $35 gas, those European prices require an ammonia price of about $1,250. You know, it is the case that the price that Tampa Ammonia is above that today. The European plants have some incentives. I'll hand it over first to Raef to provide all the color around that, and then over to Jason Newton. Look, you know, we've been watching this closely. You've seen some huge variations in the price of gas paid in Europe. Ken's right. I mean, in February, we saw about 6 million tons shut in. Tampa went up to $1,625. We saw a lot of that capacity come back online. I think what you need to keep an eye on here is what's happening with both the international ammonia pricing and the European gas prices. With European gas pricing unlikely to be much below $30 for the rest of the year, you need to have ammonia pricing well over $1,200 for them to be able to operate. Just keep an eye on that as you go through the year. You know, globally, let me just make this point here. You know, the ammonia market has continued to grow. Consumption has continued to grow at 2.5 million tons a year. Now, in the last 2 years, and if you look forward the next 2-3 years, the amount of production coming online is well below that growth in annual consumption. Market has been tightening. It continues to tighten when you have shocks like the pricing we've seen in Europe and the unfortunate war in Ukraine, it adds to it compounds the issues. In regards to India specifically, I'm gonna pass that to Jason. I think he's got a much clearer picture of what's happening there in detail. Jason, over to you. Yeah. Good morning. We've seen a really strong start to the year in India. Imports in the first quarter are up about 3x versus where they were a year ago, so over 3 million tons of imports. We expect imports to be in the range of 8-9 million tons this year compared to 7 million tons last year. I do expect an increase in imports in India in 2022. It will be interesting to watch. They're starting to tender again. We know the RCF tender for 1.5 million tons was recently announced. As we get further, and especially into the second half of the year, what the supply constraints look like and what volumes are made available for those tenders. Your next question is from Joshua Spector with UBS. Please go ahead. Yeah, hi. Thanks for taking my question. I guess just a little bit of capital allocation. I mean, a lot of conversation on potash expansions, and you have some nitrogen things in the works. Just wondering, given the improvement of performance in the phosphate side of things, is that something that deserves additional investments? Or conversely, is now a time to look about strategic options for that business? Great. Well, thank you, Joshua. Yeah, I would say that our capital allocation priorities and discipline have not changed. As we head into Investor Day, we'll certainly be talking more about capital associated with, you know, acceleration, everything we've been talking about on the call today. I'll hand it over to Pedro to just provide some more details on how we're thinking about capital allocation today. Thank you, Joshua. I think our position in terms of phos has not changed. We're running for cash. We're doing very well and have made good improvements. We are not yet prepared to allocate any cash to phos in the future for investment. Of course, we are sustaining all of our assets for reliability and safety there. As you pointed out, our capital allocation, it's gonna be. We're gonna have more options and degrees of freedom. We originally spoke about $4 billion being excess cash in the prior call, and we decided to allocate then $2 billion for share buybacks and another $2 billion will come back at the middle of the year, and talk about it. We now obviously are starting from a higher position, so we are likely to be at a multiple of that $2 billion. What we are doing is a body of work to see, as Ken pointed out before, what additional investments within the strategy we are willing to accelerate those that have a high return in payback. A number of you kind of touched on, of course, all the opportunities in potash. We also have opportunities in low-emission ammonia, and we have the continued opportunities in retail that we have spoken before. When we come to the June IR day update in June the 9th, we're gonna be able to kind of provide a more complete view of that, including what additional opportunities do we have for shareholder distribution. All of that is going. Our experience so far in terms of our capital allocation has been that we distribute, you know, a lot of our excess cash. I mean, up into 2021, we distributed $9 billion, $5 billion of which were share buybacks and dividends, and the $5 billion of buybacks were at $55 a share. Just this year, another $740 million at $82 a share. The strategy seems to be working. As we pointed out, we think that we may have a different mid-cycle earnings position that will continue to support that strategy. More to come in June 9th, but that's kind of how we are thinking so far. Our final question is from Adrien Tamagno with Berenberg. Please go ahead. Hello, good morning. Thank you for taking my question. I had one on Brazil. How do you see the competitive landscape evolving in the country? Because Russian companies have a high share of the local fertilizer distribution market. Would this allow somehow easier M&A in the country, with more sanctions on Russia? Do you see that on the ground at the moment? Yeah, if I understood correctly, Adrien, the question is about the competitive landscape in Brazil and you know, Russian fertilizers being supplied to that part of the world and what we're seeing there. Yeah. You know, we have obviously a growing retail network in Brazil, and we've been focused on continuing to grow that. We continue to see opportunity there and certainly watching that competitive landscape. But I'll hand it over to Mark Thompson, talk a little bit more who heads up you know, our M&A work in Brazil and then maybe over to Jeff Tarsi to just talk about our operations there. Mark? Yeah, thanks, Ken. Good morning, Adrien. I think your question is really on how the competitive landscape is shaping up in the distribution part of the Brazilian market structure. Obviously there's multiple layers to the market structure in Brazil in terms of ultimately how growers are served. As you've noted, the fertilizer distribution segment of that market has become relatively consolidated, and there has been some acquisition of assets by some of the Russian fertilizer companies and competitors in that space. As you know, our business is really more of a direct-to-grower, high touch, high service model in that market. Obviously, we've been quite forthcoming about our strategy that's been in place for multiple years about growing our presence in Brazil and helping growers be more productive and boost yields and adopt more technology in the country, pardon me. In the past few years, we've obviously completed five acquisitions. We've deployed about $300 million in enterprise value in the country, and we've built one of the largest multi-region businesses in Brazil today. Really it's at a segment that's one level closer to the ground than where the consolidation and the fertilizer distribution space has been. We now have over 50 locations. We've got over 10 Experience Centers. We've got fertilizer blending, soybean seed production, and nutritional formulation directly in the country. As we look forward from an M&A standpoint in Brazil, we see a healthy pipeline ahead of us. Notwithstanding the fact that we are building a large presence there and have already begun to amass one, we're still only about 1%-2% of the ag retail market in Brazil. It's a very attractive growth market for us and leaves us a lot of room to run growing forward as that part of the industry continues to consolidate and professionalize. Maybe I'll just hand it over to Jeff Tarsi for any more comments that you might have. Yeah, Mark, those are great comments and really not a lot more to add except for the fact, and I think you said it and I'll say it again, is that continues to be an extremely attractive growth opportunity for Nutrien Ag Solutions as it relates to retail. Look, we've had dual strategies there. You know, Mark's talked about the acquisition opportunities. He also referenced our Experience Centers that we're putting in, and which is kind of a new go-to market type philosophy in that business. André Dias that leads that business for us is very experienced in that market. As we looked at to add some new opportunities there, I think we'll look at them in a little bit more asset light than what we think of our markets here in North America. Those Experience Centers or hub and spoke type centers, where growers can come in and get the latest knowledge and technology, and then their product is maybe shipped from a central supply point and standpoint. We're gaining confidence by the day in our strategy in Brazil and our go-to approach there, and we're excited about what the future holds for us there. That ends the question and answer session. I will now turn the call back over to Jeff Holzman for closing remarks. Thank you, operator. Just wanted to remind everyone, registration for our June ninth investor update meeting is now open on our website. I would also like to highlight that Jason Newton, our Chief Economist, will be hosting a market update call and Q&A session on June 8th. Thanks for joining us today, and have a great day. This concludes today's conference call. Thank you for joining.