Thank you for standing by. This is the conference operator. Welcome to the Pan American Silver first quarter 2022 results conference call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may signal an operator by pressing star and zero. I would now like to turn the conference over to Siren Fisekci, Vice President, Investor Relations and Corporate Communications. Please go ahead, Ms. Fisekci. Thank you for joining us today for Pan American Silver's Q1 2022 conference call. This call includes forward-looking statements and information and makes reference to non-GAAP measures. Please see the cautionary statements in our MD&A, news release and presentation slides for our Q1 2022 unaudited results, all of which are available on our website. I'll now turn the call over to Michael Steinmann, Pan American's President and CEO. Thanks, Siren. The start of the first quarter was heavily impacted by the Omicron variant that was spreading quickly around the world. Throughout our operations, we experienced significant reductions in workforce deployments during January and early February. Fortunately, this was largely due to our COVID screening process and the government-mandated isolation periods, and not because of serious illness. With the lack of visibility on how Omicron would play out, we delayed issuing our 2022 guidance until late February. By that time, the Omicron surge was subsiding and our workforce deployment levels were rising. I'm pleased to say that we are on track to achieve our production guidance for 2022, back-end weighted to the second half of the year. This view reflects the large impact Omicron had in Q1 and our expectation that COVID, in general, will be less impactful on workforce deployment levels going forward. The mine sequencing at La Arena and Dolores and continued operational improvements at La Colorada. We are also maintaining our cost guidance for 2022. However, we are currently experiencing higher-than-expected overall inflationary pressure, particularly for diesel and certain consumables, as well as supply chain-driven cost pressures and shortages. We are carefully monitoring these largely global inflationary pressures and will adjust our cost estimates if necessary. In Q1, we produced 4.6 million ounces of silver. Silver segment all-in sustaining costs were $13.41 per ounce. Cash costs for the silver segment were $10.23 per ounce. Despite the impact of Omicron and inflationary cost pressures, higher by-product metal prices contributed to the decrease in cost at Huarón and Morococha. As well, higher by-product metal prices and silver grades led to lower costs at La Colorada, despite a 13% decline in throughput from Q4 because of Omicron. Manantial Espejo recorded strong performance in Q1 due to the contribution of high-grade ore from COSE and Joaquín. Mining operations are now winding down at COSE, as anticipated in our 2022 guidance. Silver production and cost in Q1 were negatively impacted by a decrease in grades at San Vicente from greater dilution due to the expected narrowing of the vein structures at that. We recorded some production and associated costs for Morococha in Q1 before that operation went on care and maintenance in late February. As disclosed in February when we issued our 2022 guidance, we will be decommissioning the Amistad processing plant to allow for the expansion of a neighboring mine. We completed closure at that plant in Q1, and we are currently investigating alternative opportunities for Morococha, including monetization, joint venture operation or accelerating exploration of prospective areas that could enhance the attractiveness of allocating capital to build a new processing facility. Moving on to our gold segment operations. We produced 131,000 ounces of gold in Q1. Gold segment all-in sustaining costs were $1,502 per ounce. Cash costs were $1,069 per ounce. Gold segment production and costs were impacted by lower mined grades due to mine sequencing at La Arena as expected and at Dolores. Omicron and inflationary pressures also impacted gold segment costs in Q1. A large net realizable value or NRV inventory adjustment at Dolores increased all-in sustaining costs at that operation by $321 per ounce and increased consolidated gold segment all-in sustaining costs by $94 per ounce. As a reminder, NRV inventory adjustments are accounting adjustments to recognize the production cost of inventory relative to the market value of that inventory at the time of assessment. NRV inventory adjustments do not affect cash costs. At Shahuindo, production was impacted by lower mined gold grades due to mine sequencing and the reconciliation shortfall in phase 9B of the open pit. This appears to be the localized issue as our model has been performing well over the past three years, and we are now mining into phase 10 of the pit. Shahuindo made a strong contribution to gold production in Q1 due to improved ore blending and drier than expected weather, which allowed us to increase the tons stacked on the heap. Revenue in Q1 was $439.9 million, which included inventory drawdowns of 531.6 thousand ounces of silver and 17.6 thousand ounces of gold. Net earnings in Q1 were $76.8 million or $0.36 per share. This includes a one-time $44.6 million fair value adjustment for our interest in Maverix. We have changed our accounting treatment for our interest in Maverix based on the determination that we no longer have significant influence on Maverix. Our 17% interest in Maverix is now recorded as long- term financial asset on the balance sheet and will not affect quarterly earnings. Adjusted earnings were $32 million or $0.15 per share in Q1. Cash flow from operations totaled $68.8 million, which includes $58.3 million in cash taxes and a $15.1 million build up in working capital, largely from timing of accounts payable and receivable. Our annual tax payments are typically the highest in Q1 and in Q2. We are in a strong financial position with net cash of $224.8 million. Based on the dividend policy we introduced in February, we announced a dividend of $0.12 per common share with respect to Q1. Our dividend policy provides for a base dividend of $0.10 per common share and a supplemental amount tied to the net cash on our balance sheet. This allows shareholders to participate in improving financial performance while providing liquidity to fund our growth projects. Moving on to the growth projects. Early this week, we released additional drill results for the La Colorada skarn. We completed nearly 26,000 m of infill and exploration drilling on the skarn in the quarter, the most we have completed in any single quarter. The infill drilling confirmed continuous mineralization over a 400 m-wide area in the central eastern part of the deposit, while step out drilling expanded the mineralization to the east, south, and west. We have now completed over 100,000 m of infill and exploration drilling since the last resource estimate dated August 4, 2020. We also progressed our projects for the skarn, advancing the pre-sinking for the concrete line ventilation shaft and starting the commissioning of the refrigeration plant. We have been evaluating bulk mining methods which appear to offer an attractive alternative for mining the deposit. We will be assessing these methods against an updated resource estimate for the skarn that we intend to provide early in Q3, together with the annual company reserve and resource update. At Escobal, the inclusive ILO 169 consultation process continues with the pre-consultation meeting held on May 9 and the next meeting planned for June 5. Before we open up for questions, we released our 2021 sustainability report last week. The report includes our performance on environmental, social, and governance metrics and our goals in these areas. Notably, we published a climate change policy statement that sets an objective to reduce our GHG emissions by at least 30% by 2030 from our 2019 baseline emissions. As an aspirational objective of net zero carbon dioxide equivalent emissions by 2050. With that, I would like to open a call for questions. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. To join the question queue, you may press star then one on your telephone keypad. You will hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you are using a speakerphone, please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. We will pause for a moment as callers join the queue. The first question comes from Trevor Turnbull with Scotiabank. Please go ahead. Hi, Michael. I just checked the website for the Escobal consultation process, and it looked like the last update was back in February, so I appreciate the additional information you just gave about the meeting in May. I think you said the next one either June or July. On the website, it did sound like there was about 12 meetings that needed to take place. If we count the ones in May and in the summer, that seems like that would take us to seven. Is that the right way to think about kind of the length of the process, that there's gonna be roughly 12 meetings? Hi. Good morning, Trevor. Look, I don't think so that there's a set amount of meetings. I think, you know, we are at this, you know, similar place than last quarter when I mentioned that we saw this increase of meetings and you see it now there's a very. You know, kind of a richer schedule, many more meetings than what we've seen last year, obviously due to COVID. As I explained that in earlier calls, you know, got a lengthy delay for the two years of COVID that we saw that, you know, really didn't allow the Ministry of Mines to call meetings with a lot of people in person for obvious reasons. Right now, as I said, since January, we see this continuous, you know, meetings every month at least, sometimes in between. I would assume that will continue, but I don't think so, Trevor, that you can just count, you know, a certain amount of meetings and say it's done at 12. Definitely encouraged with that, you know, with that schedule that we see now. You know, hopefully COVID stays in check in the world for all of us. I guess all of us hope that, so far, as I mentioned in the call as well, we see, you know, a huge change really compared to the last wave that really hit the world. That's when you wanna call it the first Omicron wave. I think the subsequent waves that we see now from Omicron probably not having that much of an impact. Lots of people are vaccinated. We have in the company a very high rate of vaccination. I think for the first time I can say that we are, you know, pretty much back to normal worker levels everywhere. Don't read too much in there. I think it's moving, you know, forward as hoped for the beginning of the year. We'll see where it ends. Yeah. No, I'm glad to hear that it does obviously seem to be moving and maybe picking up pace a bit. Without asking for speculation on timing or outcomes, I do wonder though, could you provide any sort of sense of how long, provided you're allowed to recommence operations, what kind of lead time you would need to get recommissioned? Well, the mine is in care and maintenance, and there is work that we can and have to do under the environmental management plan for that care and maintenance program. Of course, we keep the mine, the underground part and the mill in good shape, so that's all ready to go. Of course, we are not doing any stope development or something like that, so that would have to pick up. We would need to replace some of the underground equipment and of course hire workforce. As you can imagine, there will be, you know, a few months, but as I said, to go back to production. As I said, you know, the plant, the mine, everything is in constant care and maintenance programs and everything is in good shape. That's where. You saw that, you know, we spend probably about $1.8 million-$2 million a month on that program. You can imagine there's quite a bit of work going in there. Yeah. Just my last question is about La Colorada skarn. You've been drilling and the pending resource is coming up later this year. It appears you've done a huge amount of drilling since the previous estimate. It looks like almost 50% more, potentially by the time you provide the update. I know some of the work was focused on infill drilling, some of it was step-out into the new areas, and I just wondered how we should expect the resource update to be focused. Is this gonna be more about upgrading inferred resources, or is this gonna be more about just adding to the inferred with the step-out holes? Well, it will do both, right? I mean, we have much more information from the infill drilling, but we were still looking with the step-out holes, obviously, for the kind of the fringes or ends of this ore body. We did not find them yet. You see there it's still open around many, many directions. You know, pretty amazing if you look at those holes. Actually, Trevor, if you're familiar for sure with this kind of skarn deposits, it's actually an amazing continuation of the mineralization, right? You normally have lots of skarns that I've seen in my career have been much more variable and irregular than this. So far so good. It's growing, still growing, and really looking forward to that resource update. As we said, we drilled over 100,000 m since the last one. We are very active. We have constantly 13, 14 rigs drilling on it. So it's quite a production on that drilling. Just expect on both, as I said, a lot of infill drilling, but the step-outs will for sure increase the inferred resource as well. Okay. Yeah, looking forward to it. Thanks, Michael. Thanks, Trevor. Once again, if you have a question, please press star then one. The next question comes from Don DeMarco with National Bank Financial. Please go ahead. Hello. Thank you, operator, and good morning, everyone, Michael and team. Just maybe, Michael, continuing with some questions on the skarn. We certainly look forward to that resource update in Q3 and, but what would be the next steps beyond that resource update? Of course, there was a PEA that had, at one point been scheduled maybe for some point last year that was deferred. What do you need to know at this point in order to put that back into the calendar, to put a technical report back in the calendar? Well, a lot of work is going in on the engineering side right now, and it's really to define the mining method. Remember in like November or late last year when we talked about it, when we start finding suddenly this very big, wide and high grade zones or extremely high grade zones, I will call them, and some of the intercepts we published in November. But that kind of similar value to the optimization of our veins. Obviously the bigger size that we see that is growing everywhere. The fact that we can look now at possible bigger bulk minable or bulk mining methods. It's really the engineering on that to define what's gonna be the mining method. As you can imagine, that's the main driver on the cost for that mining. Once we have that nailed down, that will obviously define the minable part of that resource. Those are really the next steps. I think once we have that, we know much more about what exactly will be the daily tonnage for it, and that will obviously dictate the size of the plant we have to build and the tailings management that we have to look at, you know, equipment size, access, etc. That's really kind of the steps forward here. Let's wait for that resource. That's really the first step. I know that the engineering team is doing a lot of work on the mining method side, of course, parallel to that. Yeah, looking forward to those results. Okay. Yeah, as are we. Well, as a second question, if I may, shifting to Dolores. Dolores cost well above guidance, and you had some discussion on the call about Dolores. Could you just reiterate the factors that contributed to the cost at Dolores and comment on whether or not they're transient and whether you expect the cost to rebound over the rest of the year? Good morning, Don. Steve Busby here. Hi, Steve. Hi, Don. Probably the biggest driver to that cost in Q1 was the fact that we did end up processing lower grade ores than we anticipated. We did mine into an area of phase nine of the pit, of the open pit, that the ore, we had a high grade drill hole from exploration, the original exploration on the project that looked like it got a little bit overextended in that area. The ore that we encountered was quite a bit lower grade, and that's really what drove those costs up. We see that as a very localized issue. It was at the bottom of that pit phase. We're now over into phase ten. You know, I'd like to reiterate that the model we're using, we haven't really adjusted it for three years, and it's been performing incredibly well. It was just this one area that happened to come in during Q1. With those lower grades, that drove that cost per ounce up quite a bit. With that said, I mean, COVID was the other big impact, just lack of people and lack of deployment of our workforce kind of brought productivities down, brought our costs or unit costs up during that period. We didn't really face, I could say the kind of inflation numbers that we may be seeing today during Q1 as an average. It kind of came on strong as you've seen throughout the world, inflation rates on fuel prices and explosives and supplies and consumables have really kind of heated up over the last couple of months. I wouldn't really point to inflation factors as Q1 being that big of a driver. It is something we're very keen on watching very closely today. The real drivers at Dolores was that lower grade and the inefficiencies with COVID. Just to add, Don, to this, that obviously quite a sizable NRV adjustment that we've seen there and on the cost at Dolores. You see, if you take the NRV out, that makes quite a big difference. You know, different drivers for that, as you know, the NRV adjustments are adjustments to the heap value is not impacting our cash costs, of course, but mostly driven, you know, by either metal prices or costs. There definitely we see the inflationary cost pressure that impacted that. You know, the sooner that comes off, obviously the sooner we will probably see there a change depending on where metal prices go. You know, definitely higher energy costs across the world and inflationary pressure that we see, you know, everywhere in the world and in our daily lives have an impact to this kind of non-cash NRV adjustments as well. Okay. Okay, well, thank you for that additional color. As a third question, just shifting to an asset of yours that doesn't get a lot of airtime, La Arena 2. Could you just give me what your strategic intention is for this asset? Is it a divestment candidate? Are you planning to drill, expand it potentially or issue an updated technical report, maybe even develop at some point? Yeah. I think two main reasons why it doesn't get a lot of airtime. The first one is that we have been incredibly successful with the exploration and Chris with his team to expand the life of La Arena one or the oxides, the gold production at La Arena. I recall three years ago when we looked at the assets of then Tahoe Resources, you know, we assumed that La Arena oxide, the current mine will be mined out in 2021. I think we are still successfully drilling there. We'll see what that brings us. With our new resource and reserve update mid-year, but you know, very positive outcome there. We added quite a few years by now of additional gold production from the oxides of La Arena One. That's one of the reasons why I think when we did the transaction, I got quite a few questions on La Arena Two, but by then, as I said, everybody thought that La Arena One has a very short life, which obviously changed quite substantially. That's the one reason. There's definitely more time now and a lot of people looking at it because when Tahoe did their technical study, I believe they used about $3 or $3.30, somewhere around there to do the study. Sorry for that. As you can imagine, three years ago, that didn't look all that interesting. Today, that looks very interesting as a large copper gold project. Just to remind everybody who is not familiar with La Arena Two, it's basically the copper gold porphyry that sits below the La Arena One open pit. It, you know, would basically mine out the current pit and make a bigger pit below. It's a copper gold porphyry, probably about 75% copper, 25% gold revenue. Definitely a type of asset that a lot of precious metal companies are looking for. There's a big change happened in the last few years. I think, you know, it hasn't been on the radar for a while, as I said, due to metal prices and due to the fact that we just keep producing gold at La Arena and probably for quite a while longer, obviously. This definitely starts to get more interest on it. It's definitely getting more interest on my side as well, as you can imagine. Today's copper prices and the copper price outlook and, you know, the fact, as I said, that a lot of precious metals company looking for porphyries, copper-gold porphyries, and we already have one in the portfolio, so very interesting project. Okay. Well, thank you for that. Well, we'll keep an eye out for the resource update in Q3, and good luck in coming quarters. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you, Don. This concludes the question and answer session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Michael Steinmann for any closing remarks. Thanks, operator. Thank you everyone for calling in. Looking forward to give you an update on our Q2 results, which will be, well, August already. Enjoy your spring and early summer and talk in August. Thank you, everybody. This concludes today's conference call. You may disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.