Good morning, and welcome to Primaris REIT's second quarter, 2023 results conference call. At this time, all lines have been placed on mute. After the prepared remarks, there will be a question and answer session. I will now turn the call over to Claire Mahaney, Investor Relations. Please go ahead. Thank you, Carla. During this call, management of Primaris REIT may make statements containing forward-looking information within the meaning of applicable securities law. Forward-looking information is based on a number of assumptions and is subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond Primaris REIT's control, that could cause the actual results to differ materially from those that are disclosed in or implied by such forward-looking information. Additional information about these assumptions, risks, and uncertainties are contained in Primaris REIT's filings with securities regulators. These filings are also available on Primaris REIT's website at www.primarisreit.com. I'll now turn the call over to Alex Avery, Primaris' Chief Executive Officer. Good morning, thank you for joining us today to discuss Primaris REIT's second quarter 2023 results. On the call with me today are Patrick Sullivan, President and Chief Operating Officer, Rags Davloor, Chief Financial Officer, Leslie Buist, Senior Vice President, Finance, Graham Procter, Senior Vice President, Asset Management, and Mordecai Bobrowsky, Legal. Our year-to-date financial and operating results continue to demonstrate the resiliency and enduring value proposition of our business and show a clear trend of growth. Same Properties Cash NOI rose 6.4% in the first half of the year, with rising occupancy and strong leasing spreads. A few quarters ago, we told you one of our four goals for 2023 was to demonstrate our ability to transact on acquisitions and dispositions that are consistent with the REIT's strategy and that enhance the value of Primaris REIT units. We are thrilled to have closed on the acquisition of Conestoga Mall on July 12th, further validating and proving support for Primaris's platform, strategy, and value proposition. This was a very important transaction for Primaris for a few reasons. Firstly, the mall is illustrative of the type of acquisitions Primaris is focused on, being a market-leading mall with mass rapid transit connectivity in a medium-sized, high-growth market. Secondly, it demonstrates our ability to transact on these types of highly attractive properties. Finally, it highlights to prospective vendors that Primaris is uniquely positioned to partner with the institutions that are the primary owners of market-leading Canadian malls and offer liquidity solutions, including immediate partial liquidity, with the opportunity to continue to participate in the recovery of the Canadian mall sector. Since the inception of Primaris REIT, we have been very clear about the significant opportunity to acquire leading mall properties. This continues to be the case, and we feel our ability to capture this opportunity is enhanced with each quarter we report and each transaction we execute. Another very significant development during Q2 2023 was the launch of our Unit Purchase Loan Program. In a nutshell, under the loan program, Primaris extends loans to full-time employees of the REIT of up to $100,000 each to purchase Primaris units, with a fixed interest rate and a fixed 15-year full amortization. This unique and innovative supplemental savings program is available to all full-time employees of the REIT, other than senior management and board members, for the obvious governance reasons. In the first window that the loans were offered in June, 25 Primaris employees borrowed $1.8 million to buy Primaris units. I'm thrilled that we're able to offer this program to help our team members build personal wealth. In aggregate, there are approximately 350 eligible employees that, in theory, could borrow as much as CAD 25 million if every employee borrowed their maximum on the same day. As we launched this program, one of the common questions we received from many of our staff was: What's in it for Primaris? My response was generally something along the lines of: Our team, our team and our culture are highly valuable assets to the REIT, and this is an investment in our team. I also noted that it incentivizes our team members to make the connections between their day-to-day job activities and the REIT's broader organizational goals. In a sense, we now have 25 highly aligned and incentivized Primaris fans spread throughout the entire organization. I hope this program grows to represent more than 100 team members. Looking to the future, there continues to be substantial NOI growth potential across our portfolio through raising occupancy to stabilized levels and converting leases back to standard terms. We have made material progress over the last 18 months, but the vast majority of this opportunity remains to be captured over the next few years, an amount we estimate to be more than CAD 30 million. This opportunity is supported by tenant sales in our portfolio that have more than recovered from the recent operating challenges of the last few years, while the rent that we are collecting remains depressed, subject to temporary lease amendments due to be renegotiated over the next few years. Indeed, with our Q2 results, we have once again raised our same property NOI growth guidance because our business is accelerating faster than we had previously forecast. Lastly, before I turn it over to Pat, I have a few comments on capital allocation. As you all know, we spend a lot of time thinking about capital allocation and value creation. At our board meeting yesterday, this was a topic of a great deal of discussion. Our normal course issuer bid has been a very effective tool to drive growth in per unit FFO and NAV for Primaris unitholders. The two governing factors that have limited the volume of our buyback activity have been, number one, a desire not to reduce the equity base of our business, and number two, a desire not to increase financial leverage. Having completed the Conestoga transaction, we have significantly expanded the asset and equity bases of our, of the REIT, and with this milestone behind us, we plan to accelerate the pace of capital recycling, including both non-core dispositions and higher volumes of buyback activity under the REIT's normal course issuer bid. Disposing of our open-air strip centers and excess lands provides access to capital from assets with low or even negative NOI contribution to fund highly accretive unit buybacks without shrinking the business or raising leverage outside of our target range. I'll now turn the, the call over to Pat to discuss operating and leasing results, followed by Rags, who will discuss our financial results. Pat? Thank you, Alex. Good morning. Following several years of headwinds, the current environment for Canadian mall ownership is very favorable. On fundamentals, the current supply of quality retail space in Canada is limited. There has not been a new mall built in decades, current new construction is very limited, and the majority of available space created by failed department store anchors has primarily been absorbed or demolished. Population growth is expected to continue in Canada, with record high immigration levels of over 450,000 immigrants per year to 2025. With the rising cost of living in Canada's largest cities, medium-sized, high-growth markets, where we own leading malls, are growing at rates that outpace the Canadian population growth rate. In fact, Primaris trade areas are expected to grow at 11.1% over the next five years, far outpacing the forecast national average growth rate of 4.5%. Given the lack of new supply and population growth over the last 20+ years, malls in our markets are typically located at the center of town, where the population has grown around the property. Our 23 shopping centers portfolio is situated on over 950 acres of land. Not only are these properties at the center of their communities, but they are located close to major transportation nodes and public transit, with broad zoning permitting a wide range of uses beyond retail, enabling potential future value creation. This land has been made more valuable over the past 10 years as traditional department store anchors have closed or their leases restructured, removing development constraints. Occupancy levels across the Canadian retail REIT peer set are essentially at stabilization in the 95%+ range. Primaris has at least 500 basis points of runway until we are at stabilized levels, allowing us to capture the strong demand for space that we are seeing from tenants. Tenant sales, productivity, and volumes have rebounded and surpassed pre-pandemic levels at the majority of our properties. Rents have been adjusted downwards as a result of the pandemic. Ours are still considerably lower than where they were pre-pandemic. With a financially healthier tenant base, Primaris is in an excellent position to capture this rental growth across our portfolio. It is this combination of low supply, rising sales, population growth, and increasing tenant demand for quality space that creates the significant opportunity to drive rents and occupancy higher to quality tenants with the ability to pay increasing rents over time, driving NOI growth. As Alex mentioned, our team is very excited to add Conestoga Mall, located in the growing market of Waterloo, Ontario, to our property portfolio. We believe that our leasing and operations teams will drive significant income growth at Conestoga Mall, consistent with our existing assets over the next 24 months. With new and exciting retailers unique in the market, including Apple and Lululemon, Conestoga Mall is amongst the top 15 most productive malls in Canada and is highly accretive to Primaris' overall portfolio quality. Same-store sales at Conestoga Mall surpassed CAD 1,000 per square foot in June 2023, which makes the property the highest-performing mall in the Primaris portfolio. Our growth opportunity for this property is to reduce the almost 55,000 sq ft of vacant and short-term temporary tenancies with long-term tenants. By way of comparison, Orchard Park in Kelowna produces sales of CAD 819 per square foot and has an occupancy rate, excluding short-term tenants, that is more than 6% higher. Further, given the high productivity of the mall, we are confident that we'll be able to increase rents paid by tenants with long-term leases due to expire over the next few years. For the past several years, Primaris has been very focused on preserving occupancy as the Canadian retail mall sector observed the departures of Target and Sears, retailers transitioned to omni-channel business models, and the pandemic-driven government-mandated lockdowns and mall closures. In 2023, portfolio committed occupancy rose to 91%. We have very good visibility that we've stabilized occupancy above 95% over the next few years. Our leasing team has begun to prioritize rent growth in their discussions as we gain negotiating leverage. This can be seen in our growing leasing spread since the REIT's formation. We expect to continue to push leasing spreads over the next several quarters as available space in our portfolio declines. Our NOI growth outperformance in the second quarter is supported by the strong fundamentals we are experiencing in our national full-service platform and team. Specifically, growth is coming from a number of sources, being rising occupancy, completion of re-merchandising of former anchor tenant premises, increasing sales due to healthy tenant demand, and partially due to rising inflation, driving percentage rental income higher. Especially leasing income returning to pre-pandemic levels, falling non-recoverable expenses due to lower bad debt, along with increased occupancy, specifically related to former vacant anchor premises. Our recovery ratios are improving as we convert tenants on preferred rental terms provided to maintain occupancy during the pandemic back to net leases. We ended the second quarter with committed occupancy of 91%, up from 87.4% at the end of the second quarter in 2022. Over the past 18 months, we have shown consistent progress in growing occupancy. Our in-place occupancy at Q2 2023 is 89.8%, which is 4% higher than at the start of 2022. Same-store productivity is an all-time high of CAD 615 per square foot as of June 2023, driven by strong sales growth over the past 24 months. Including Conestoga Mall, our same-store sales figure rises to CAD 640 per square foot. For reference, same-store sales in December 2019 were CAD 545 per square foot. On last quarter's call, I mentioned we anticipated sales growth would level off. While we are starting to see sales for some tenants stabilize year-over-year, tenant sales continue to be very strong. In June 2023, same-property sales were approximately 6% higher than in June 2022, led by strong gains at our properties in Alberta. Leasing activity is very strong, continuing a trend from prior quarters. Our flat occupancy reported in Q2 versus Q1 is due to us intentionally terminating temporary tenants to consolidate space in order to accommodate new tenants on permanent leases. Typically, re-merchandising occurs during the first three quarters, there is downtime associated with replacing tenancy. With strong leasing activity continuing, we expect committed occupancy will continue to rise in the coming quarters, but this quarter, much of the new leasing is associated with replacement of short-term leases with long-term quality tenancies. During the 2Q 2023, our leasing team completed 156 transactions encompassing 546,000 sq ft, including 35 new CRU deals, which is the highest number of new CRU deals completed since 2018. Of note, we completed a 19,500 sq ft transaction with a medical use for Sunridge Mall, as well as three more deals with Sephora and two more deals with Specsavers. With respect to renewals, we completed a renewal with Real Canadian Superstore at Lansdowne Place for 103,500 sq ft, as well as three Shoppers Drug Mart locations encompassing 50,000 sq ft. Overall, renewal rents increased 8.2% over previous in-place rents, with CRU space showing an impressive 6% increase. With tenant sales having risen considerably over the past 24 months and growing occupancy, we anticipate continued positive momentum in rental growth. Not captured in our renewal rent change is the conversion of leases with preferred rental terms, such as percentage rent in lieu of base rent or gross rent, back to net leases. The implication being that there are additional gains to those that are captured by traditional net-to-net lease renewal analysis. At quarter end, there were 295 tenants, representing just over 13% of our tenant base on preferred rental structures. This is a reduction of 40 leases from December 31, 2022. With a number of other leases completed and commencing later in the year, this figure will continue to decline during the balance of 2023, which will have a significant positive impact on our NOI for 2023 and beyond. With that, I'll turn the call over to Rags to discuss our financial results. Thanks, Pat, and good morning, everyone. Strategically, we continue to focus on our differentiated financial model, represented by low leverage, low payout ratio, and significant free cash flow, which we believe is a major strategic advantage for Primaris REIT. Keeping in line with best practices and transparency, we are reiterating our balance sheet targets and are raising and tightening our guidance metrics. Reflecting strong results to date and the strength of our business, we are raising and tightening our 2023 Same Properties Cash NOI guidance to 4%-5.5% from our previous guidance of 3%-5%. Unsecured debt now comprises 73% of our total debt, with unencumbered assets of CAD 3 billion, including Conestoga Mall, and 0 debt maturing in 2023. We are very well positioned with reduced refinancing risk and enhanced liquidity. In March of this year, we received an initial rating upgrade to BBB (high) Stable from DBRS. Primaris has been in the market continuously repurchasing units since March 2022 under the NCIB. As of yesterday, we have purchased for cancellation 5.5 million units at an average value per unit of approximately CAD 14.02. This program is very accretive to unitholders, given the current discount to our NAV of CAD 21.90. With regards to our disclosure package, we've added ranges for discount rates and terminal cap rates to provide further context to the valuation inputs used in the fair value process. Driving forward, our board-led ESG plan, the team completed our inaugural GRESB real estate assessment and CDP climate change questionnaire. The results of Primaris' GRESB submission will be publicly available in October 2023. The submission was the culmination of months of data collection and analysis. The data collected from GRESB will formulate the baseline environmental and social data sets from which we intend to develop targets for the core environmental and social ESG factors. The results will also highlight key areas of focus to advance Primaris' ESG plan. ESG is an essential component of Primaris' overall strategy from both risk mitigation and opportunity optimization standpoints. Now on to our financial results. Same Properties Cash NOI was up 3.4% for the quarter, driven primarily by higher revenues from base rent, specialty leasing, and recovery of operating costs, partially offset by lower percentage rent in lieu of base rent. Same Property Cash NOI growth for the shopping center portfolio was 3.7%. As Pat already mentioned, tenant health is strong across our portfolio, and our many operating metrics are continuing to improve, capture, and grow. Operating cost recoveries continue to improve as we restructure our leases, with the NOI margin improving from 56.6% last year to 57.2% in Q2 of this year. FFO and AFFO per unit average diluted for the quarter was CAD 0.395 and CAD 0.266. On the quarter, the FFO and AFFO payout ratios were 51.9% and 77.1%. We are marginally above our FFO payout ratio target of 45%-50%, but expect this to come back within the range during the fourth quarter of this year. Primaris fair value of investment properties was CAD 3.2 billion, with external valuations received for five properties, with fair values totaling CAD 157 million. On a portfolio basis, we incurred an unfavorable fair value adjustment of CAD 10.6 million for the quarter, mainly driven by adjustments to terminal cap rates and discount rates and cash flow assumptions around capital expenditures. While higher cap rates and higher interest rates have offset what would have been strong per-unit NAV and FFO growth, we believe that we have absorbed these headwinds. As a result of our financing activities over the last 18 months, our weighted average term to maturity on debt is now 3.6 years. With the visibility we have into future NOI growth, we expect to see accelerating growth in per-unit FFO and NAV over the next several quarters. Based on the value of our assets, we ended the quarter with a NAV of $21.90 per unit and debt to total assets of 33.3%. Average net debt to adjusted EBITDA was 5.2 times. Pro forma Conestoga, our exposure to floating rate debt continues to be low at approximately 8%. In due course, we would look to term out this debt with an unsecured bond issue. As we previously mentioned, our financial structure enabled us to execute on our acquisition strategy. Conestoga Mall was acquired with existing liquidity without the need to arrange additional new financing. This transaction demonstrates the advantage Primaris has with having one of the lowest leverage among Canadian REITs. We are very pleased to have executed a transaction of this quality while preserving our industry-leading financial metrics within target ranges, thereby enabling us to continue pursuing investment opportunities. We put a lot of emphasis on our differentiated financial model in our disclosure and when we speak to the investment committee. Part of this model has been somewhat obscured in the reach of our financial results to date. I'll take a few minutes to walk you through it. In the first 18 months of public reporting, Primaris' NAV has essentially remained unchanged despite the weighted average growth in cap rate on the portfolio having risen by more than 80 basis points. Similarly, FFO per unit in Q2 was within CAD 0.004, or 1% of the prior FFO per unit, and 6 months 2023 FFO was within CAD 0.015 of the first 6 months 2022. This is despite interest expense being CAD 0.10 per unit higher as a result of the REIT's efforts to term out its debt profile. In doing so, the REIT's weighted average interest rates rose from 2.5% on December 31, 2021, to 4.76% at Q2 2023, almost doubling, while extending the average term to maturity on the debt to 3.6 years from 1.7 years. Despite these substantial headwinds, NAV and FFO per unit were largely unchanged, with the offsetting driver in both cases was a combination of very strong NOI growth and a reduction of the units outstanding. This financial model is intentional and a critical pillar to our strategy and our growth story, and forms part of our compensation structure. Maintaining a conservative financial model and generating free cash flow after distributions and CapEx is a core focus with which we will not deviate from. With that, I'll turn the call back to Alex. Thank you, Rags. In conclusion, we are very pleased with our progress to date. We continue to prioritize raising awareness about Primaris REIT, communicating our strategy, building a public track record of strong results, and demonstrating disciplined capital allocation are key to building institutional support. We hosted a highly successful first property tour in May, and are planning to get our investors out to see Conestoga Mall in the fall. In a lot of ways, it feels like we spent the first 12 or 18 months at Primaris getting set up. With our balance sheet properly set up, our first milestone acquisition behind us, and plans to accelerate our capital recycling initiatives, we've just begun to demonstrate what is possible. We'd now be pleased to answer any questions from the call participants. Operator, please open the line for questions. Thank you. If you would like to ask a question during this time, simply press star followed by the number one on your telephone keypad. If you would like to withdraw your question, press star followed by the number two. We'll pause for a moment to compile the Q&A roster. Your first question comes from the line of Brad Sturges from Raymond James. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Just to maybe kick off with the commentary around the NCIB and looking to reaccelerate, is it fair to say you would be comfortable getting back to where you were running at, I guess, prior to Q2? I think it was closer to like $50 million quarter, $60 million kind of annualized. Is that kind of the level you're thinking about, given where the stock is today? Yeah. No, I think you're, you're right, Brad, directionally. You know, if you look at, 20,000 units a day, which was what we were running at, we brought it down by 75% to 5,000 units a day. We would, you know, be thinking in the same, same neighborhood. Okay. Then, I guess on the commentary around, you know, being more open to exploring asset sales, with, I guess, a few land parcels already listed, or held for sale at, at the end of the quarter. I guess I'm curious to know how advanced are you in terms of perhaps listing an asset for sale today? You know, how should we think about the potential quantum of that near-term program? Yeah, I mean, as you see, the, we've got three properties, designated as held for sale. They're, you know, deals that are in process. As it relates to, you know, any larger transactions, this current market is a little bit more of a, you know, private discussion type of a market. We haven't listed any of our larger properties for sale. We do, on a fairly regular basis, get inquiries from people looking to acquire, you know, some of our even sort of middle, middle-sized assets. As it relates to, you know, our non-core portfolio, the, the ones that are strip centers, we've got the one industrial property, and we've got a, a bunch of chunks of land. You know, those are, actually pretty easy properties to transact on. The pricing, the market liquidity, and the, you know, number of prospective buyers are quite high. As we're thinking about this, I mean, if we were to suggest that we could dispose of, you know, CAD 200 million of assets in the next, you know, 12, 18, 24 months, I think that's a reasonable quantum to be thinking about. I, I guess, I guess the one question on the, on the three parcels held for sale today, can you give a sense of like, what properties or where, what locations those, those parcels are at? Yeah. One is two acres of land across from Orchard Park in Kelowna. We've got, I think, 4.5 acres at Sherwood Park in Edmonton, and then there's two acres in Medicine Hat. All of which are just basically excess land, in some cases covered in grass, and in other cases, you know, overflow parking or things where, you know, they just haven't been utilized. We do pay property taxes on, on that land, so selling them is actually accretive to our cash flow, which is interesting, plus, we use the proceeds to pay off debt or invest in other investments. I, I guess last question from me: In terms of selling income-producing assets, how do you expect the interplay to be between, I guess, your cap rate on exit on sale versus if you're deploying into acquisition opportunities for, you know, malls that kind of fit your criteria? The, the strip center-type assets would likely transact at similar type cap rates to what we are looking to acquire. You know, the land obviously generally has a negative cap rate, which is highly accretive for us. To the extent that we were to look to sell some of our non-core enclosed shopping centers, generally those would be at higher cap rates. I mean, if you look in our IFRS fair value disclosure, we show the ranges of cap rates. You know, generally speaking, we would be looking to sell the lower growth assets, which tend to have higher cap rates associated with them. Yep. Okay, that makes sense. I mean, there's a balancing act. Yeah, I mean, there is a bit of a balancing act there, which is why we would look to supplement some of this capital recycling into the NCIB. Right. Also it, it's, it's kind of, I guess, changing the mix of the portfolio to, into better growth opportunities and into sort of the, the types of assets you want to own on a longer term basis. Absolutely. Yep. That's the criteria through which we look at our acquisitions, is they need to enhance our internal growth profile. Yeah. Thanks. I'll turn it back. Thanks, Brad. Your next question comes from the line of Lorne Kalmar from Desjardins. Your line is open. Hey. Hi, good morning. Just maybe talking about the occupancy, obviously down a little bit year to date. Was that sort of factored in when you initially provided your guidance? Could you give a little bit of color on sort of what you expect the cadence of occupancy gains to be over the balance of the year? Yeah. Hi, Lorne. Yeah, occupancy, getting caught up quarter to quarter is tough to really measure quarter to quarter, especially when we're in the middle of the year and going through remerchandising. Given that the leasing market is shifting to a landlord market, we've taken a much stronger stance with retaining short-term tenants that aren't paying us enough rent. If they don't step up and pay, we're replacing them. During the quarter, a lot of the new tenants that are committed to space were just simply replacing short-term or temporary tenants. We did have a large one, H&M closed at McAllister in the quarter, and we have a replacement deal in hand that closes, will close in this quarter. That's around 20,000 sq ft. Going forward, I, I don't think we have any concern about our, our, our committed occupancy driving up. There's, there's good visibility to about 100,000 sq ft of net absorption from simply a bunch of large format tenants that we're working on, primarily at Lansdowne Place and Sudbury. Okay, that is very helpful. Then you mentioned a little bit of progress on the conversion of specialty leases. I think you're down to 13%. You were 14% last quarter. Where, where do you think you can get to by the end of the year, and then by the end of 2024? Based on what's completed right now, there's about 45 deals that are already completed of tenants that are going to convert, that just their leases have not commenced yet. You know, that program continues. That's, that's just what's already known to us, and then there's a lot more that's in transition. I think we've always guided towards being in the 11% range by the end of the year, and I think we're going to get there, and then subsequent next year, we'll, we'll trend down from there into the single digits. Okay. Pat hit on this... Sorry, sorry, Lorne. Pat hit on it indirectly- Yep ... but the way that we present that data is based on the leases that are in effect, not on forward commitments. When Pat was mentioning the 45, those are deals that have been executed, but they haven't commenced yet. Just to make sure everyone understands the, the presentation of that information. Got it. Thank you. Lastly, there, there were some headlines about the Bay rationalizing stores and whatnot. Any concerns of impact on your portfolio, or you guys think you're going to be okay there? We're, we're, we're going to be fine. I, I, I know that they had said they were going to close at a mall in Edmonton, subsequently came out and said they've renegotiated the deal to remain in half the, half the store. We've, we've, we've had no discussions with them as of late of, with regard to any of their locations in our portfolio at all. It's just business as usual for us. Okay, great. Thank you so much. I will turn it back. Your next question comes from the line of Sam Damiani from TD Securities. Your line is open. Thank you. Good morning, everyone. Pat, maybe just on the, the dip in occupancy, and it sounds like being a little more aggressive on, on upgrading some tenants. Can you give some examples of either some, some tenants or at least some categories, that you're shifting out in favor of the types of categories or tenants that you're adding to the portfolio, currently? Just given the, the again, the occupancy decline this year, which was a little faster than it did last year. I'm not sure I would say it's a category-specific thing. I think I'll, I'll kind of categorize the tenants. There's some tenants that we'll say were space fillers for the throughout the pandemic era that, you know, really want to continue on the same, same approach of percentage, and we're not willing to continue. An example is in Highstreet, we had a fashion tenant that was on percentage rent. We replaced them with a large one. It was about 8,000 sq ft. We took them out, replaced them with La Vie en Rose in half, and we've just got a shoe store that committed to the other half. In Place Rosemère, and Peter Pond, we had some tenants at Center Ice that were in temporary short-term percentage rent deals. Sephora took both locations, and we did 10-year deals with them. We, we've materially upgraded both the quality of tenant and the long-term rental profile of, to the space. Well, that's great, very helpful. I noticed the, in the guidance, the development CapEx was raised by about CAD 20 million this year. Sounds like some of that, at least, is to do with Northland Village. I wonder if you could provide a little more color there and give us an update on the, you know, leasing status of the Northland Village redevelopment? It, it primarily is all related to Northland. Northland, from the outset, we said that the, the project would be driven by leasing, and the pace that we actually developed the space would be driven by leasing. We're very happy to report that we're doing very well on the leasing front. We're seeing above, above expected, above expected rents. There is, a number of pad buildings that we haven't started yet. If we exclude those, based on what's under construction and what's already built, we're 73% leased, with another 23% that's at the, final stages of either lease negotiation or negotiation. We're in very very solid footing, and based on the, the leasing that was in place, we progressed. We advanced a number of our construction initiatives at that site to get turnover earlier. That's great. Great to hear. As you look out into 2024, what would be your sort of highlights in terms of your development CapEx expectations or guidance? I think we have a lot of smaller, focused projects in 2024. We have, we have three bank pads, where really our construction risk is mitigated. We're basically providing a service pad and then providing a tenant allowance to the tenant who's taking on the construction risk. The larger project that we're kind of working our way through right now is the demolition of the Sears box at Devonshire and the remerchandising of the space in the inside of the shopping center. We're just working through our tender package for the demolition of that building right now, and I fully expect we'll get going on that project early next year. That's it for me. Thank you, and I'll turn it back. Your next question comes from the line of Sumayya Syed from CIBC. Your line is open. Thanks. Good morning. I just quickly wanted to touch on your leasing spreads and if the high single-digit level is something you guys expect to deliver going forward, or should we expect any upside to that? I would think based on, you know, my, the history, even going back, well before even Target left, when we had our leasing spread, that I think it's fairly. I think it'll be a fairly reasonable number to expect us to be in the, you know, the 5%-9% range for tenancies. You know, there's huge gains that you can get from renewing large format tenants that are coming off a relatively low base. For the most part, our average, our average tier U tenant pays around, you know, CAD 40 a foot. You know, high, mid to high single digits is, is probably the expected norm. Okay, thanks for that. I just want to try and- Sumaiya, just one more additional note on. Sorry, I was just going to add that, in terms of the presentation of that information, leasing spreads are calculated as net leases to net leases. The leasing spread doesn't capture the, you know, return of modified leases to normal standard terms, and that is where, particularly, you know, over the next two years, we'll see the biggest gains. It, I guess structurally underrepresents the amount of growth that we're getting in rent. Right. That will still come through in your same property numbers? They do, yes. Okay. Thank you. Yeah, next, I wanted to touch on Conestoga Mall. The, the retail mixer is a bit more productive, but I can-- if I can say it's not the typical Primaris mix, where you have more of a value essential component. Just wondering, how do you balance the two when exploring potential acquisitions? I think the merchandise mix at Conestoga, I mean, the main differentiator between Conestoga and the rest of our malls is really it has an Apple store. It's the 1st Apple store in our portfolio. They've just transacted with Browns, and we don't have any of those. They have Aritzia, which we have one of, and Lulu, which we're growing our footprint with Lulu. There's not a material difference from the rest of our portfolio. Certainly, the Apple and the Aritzia, and Lulu, and the Browns will drive the productivity much higher, but the rest of the tenant mix is fairly similar to the rest of our portfolio. I think it's going to be a pretty typical merchandise mix that we look for in other malls that we're looking to acquire. Great! That's all from me. I'll turn it back. Thanks, Sumayya. Your next question comes from the line of Tal Woolley from National Bank Financial. Your line is open. Hey, good morning. Morning, Tal. Hey, how's it going? I'm just wondering on the Conestoga Mall acquisition, you know, you talked up that one of the advantages here is that you're going to be able to bring this asset onto your management platform. Can you just talk a little bit about what sort of incremental cost savings or synergy that, you know, you think you can drive out of this asset over time? Sure. First of all, we, we own, we own Guelph, which is in the trade area, Stone Road, sorry. We're, we've got some good synergy working with the staff of Conestoga, and our staff at Stone Road. We'll be looking for procurement opportunities in that region, between Stone Road, between our other Ontario malls in that region, to help drive some cost savings. Just from a, from a tenant point of view, just it gives us one more really good mall to use as a negotiating tool when dealing with tenants to cover the trade area. Really, really the potential at Conestoga in the short term lies with, lies with, what we believe to be, more vacancy than they then should be in a mall of that quality. The mall's been mentioned, it has been managed by third-party managers, not that there's anything wrong with that, but, you know, the mentality of a third-party manager is, is different than it is for a owner-manager who has a much more a longer view of the asset than, than would be by a third-party manager. Got it. Just to add more color from a, from a G&A perspective, sorry, just wanted to add, from a G&A perspective, it would have a very marginal impact because we, you know, we do have capacity, and we're scaling up, and so, you know, we can bolt on a property of that size and magnitude with very, very, low marginal cost implications from a, from a corporate G&A perspective. Got it. And then just as the Northland redevelopment progresses and ends, you know, I know that, like, it is somewhat of a different format than your core holdings. Does Northland look like a non-core asset once it's done? Yes. Yeah, it does. It. Okay ... it should be, we're, we're anticipating that the profile of the asset will be, you know, one of the best, power centers in the country, and that's not our core focus. Got it. Then I just wanted to maybe get a little bit more knowledge around how to think about percentage rents as we sort of move into the back half of the year. You know, when you're thinking about giving the growth in occupancy, the return on tenant productivity, are you able, at this point, to kind of give an idea of what sort of lift we might be expecting from percentage rent contributions as we go into the back half of the year? Percentage rent, as opposed to, say, percentage rent in lieu, percentage rent is, it's trending well above historical norm. I think we're, we're, we're about, almost double what we, what we, typically have done historically, and I don't know that I see that falling off. Tenants are well above their break points, and, and given that a lot of them are, are midterm leases or early in their lease term, their break points are not going to get readjusted. I think that's a fairly stable number through the end of the year. Percentage rent in lieu, you know, it fell off this quarter simply because we're, we're converting tenants back to net leases, and those conversion back to net leases, are overall much more accretive to NOIs than leaving them on a percentage rent structure. The big gain, of course, for us is their recovery ratio and driving it back to a historical norm, which is about 20% higher than it is, or 20 basis points higher than it is now. I think overall, percentage rent in lieu, I think will continue to see decline, but it'll be offset by more than offset by gains in our recovery ratios and our base rent. When you're thinking about the tenants on, you know, these temporary, these temporary retreats or, you know, from, from COVID, from the COVID period, like, is the math such that, like, I'm assuming most of these guys would have below average productivity, and the percent that you, you know, the percentage that you'd be trying to claim on that would maybe be a little bit higher than what you would typically, typically see versus percentage rent, or because it was a deal, it's the percentage is actually the... You know, so the percentage you're trying to take is a little bit, is lower than average? You know, there, there, there's, there's a lot of tenants that were on these preferred deals that had filed for creditor protection during pandemic, and their terms are extended out for a period of time, and they're due to come off. Some of those deals, the percentage rent in lieu that they paid were fairly similar to what their, their net deal is gonna look like at the end, but that's, that's not typical. Like, there's some, but most are paying well below what they should pay from a CRoC perspective going forward. There is considerable upside in converting these tenants back on a macro basis, but there is the odd tenant where the upside is limited because they do perform exceptionally well. Okay. Just lastly on the thing, opportunities, you know, you sort of mentioned that with the Conestoga acquisition, you build, some relationships with new, you know, retailers that you don't have in the rest of your portfolio. Is it a, you know, like, is it a question of, like, now that you have that door open, like, it's really easy to sort of, you know, take a tenant, like, say, in Aritzia or something like that, and move them, you know, move them into space across the portfolio? Or, am I overthinking that, and it's just a, you know, like it is sort of like a one-by-one kind of approach you've got to deal with? ... I, I, I think you're overthinking it. I think, you know, it is our first Apple. We have one other Aritzia in our portfolio, but we know all, all of the Canadian retailers are well known to us. We have great relationships with Lulu, Aritzia, you know, we all know each other. And, you know, it's, it's very it's driven by them wanting to do more deals in our portfolio. And, you know, we, we've got ongoing discussions with, with, in that respect. But I think what it does do is, is, it gives us a little bit better leverage in dealing with tenants across our portfolio as a whole, with a broader range of tenants. Ones that don't wanna give up their location in, in Conestoga, going forward. It's, it's really a portfolio play for us, as opposed to just trying to use an acquisition to pry a specific tenant into another one of our malls. Got it. Okay, that's helpful. Thanks very much. If you would like to ask a question, press star, then the one on your telephone keypad. Your next question comes from the line of Mark Rothschild from Canaccord Genuity. Your line is open. Thanks, good morning, everyone. Most of my questions have been asked already, but Alex, maybe in regards to the asset sale that you're talking about, you noted that the cap rates are gonna be slightly higher on some of these assets. To what extent are you okay and comfortable going ahead and selling a relatively large amount of assets, which might be FFO dilutive, but you would probably say would be accretive to an NAV? How does that factor in to what you're looking to do? Yeah, Mark, you, you raise a, a good point. I think, you know, as we look at the portfolio composition, you know, we're, we're looking to optimize the internal growth profile that we have. The, the assets that have the lowest growth would be the ones that come with the highest cap rates. You know, in terms of marketing for sale, any of those assets, you know, are, are alternative cost of capital or sources of capital or investment opportunities don't really factor into that process. In terms of selecting which assets we might wanna sell, it does. Right now, we're in a very fortunate position where, you know, if we were to, for instance, sell a property with a, you know, a valuation of an 8.5 cap, now we can buy back our stock, you know, at a 10 something implied cap rate. All day long, that is a trade that we should be doing. I think the messaging that, you know, we included with this quarter's results is effectively that, you know, we're moving in that direction. Okay, great. Thanks. That's all for me. Appreciate it. Thanks, Mark. Your next question comes from the line of Gaurav Mathur from iA Capital Markets. Your line is open. Thank you, and good morning, everyone. Alex, just when you're looking at the acquisition pipeline up ahead, and given what you did with the Conestoga Mall, how, how are vendors thinking about doing transactions through a mix of cash and stock? Morning, Gaurav. I, you know, I, I've, I've highlighted it a few times, but I think demonstrating a transaction like we did with Conestoga, really helps in terms of, you know, prospective vendors understanding what a transaction looks like, and they can see what the, you know, composition of consideration looked like. It really, I think, you know, facilitates discussions. What we've seen, you know, since that transaction, you know, became public is, you know, the discussions that we've been having with multiple parties, have generally, picked up. You know, we're, we're optimistic that we'll be able to, you know, acquire similar assets. It would be ideal if we could acquire another one this year. You know, we would hope to acquire several over the next couple of years. Okay, great. Then, you know, that leads me into my next question. As you're thinking about capital allocation, is, is the pecking order still the NCIB development and then acquisitions, or is that changing over the next sort of 12 to 18 months? Yeah, I mean, when we look at the returns available to allocate our capital to, the NCIB is just a tremendous... You know, it's well north of 50% instantaneously with effectively no risk. The only real governing factors that we have on investing capital into that are, you know, that we don't wanna increase leverage because we're very committed to our differentiated financial model. Secondly, we wanna make sure that we're not shrinking the business. One of the items of feedback that we get from investors is that trading liquidity in our stock is sometimes a challenge for larger investors. What we'd like to do is continue to grow the business, but as we're looking at marginal capital allocation decisions, there's nothing on the table today that remotely compares to the effectiveness of the NCIB. Okay, great. Thank you for the call, Alex. I'll call you back. Thanks, Gaurav. There are no further questions at this time. Claire, I turn the call back over to you. Thank you, Carla. With no further questions, we'll close today's call. On behalf of the Primaris team, we thank you for all your participating in the call, and we look forward to speaking to you again in November. Thank you, and have a great long weekend. Thank you. You may now disconnect.