Year-end and fourth quarter results presentation. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode, and the meeting is being recorded. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. If you wish to, if you wish to ask a question, please click the Q&A icon located on the right-hand side of the screen. You will see the option for Raise your Hand to join the queue and ask your question verbally, or you may write a question to submit your question in writing. When you're introduced, your line will automatically be unmuted. For analysts who have joined us today into the conference, you can click on one on your telephone keypad and join the question queue that way as well. I would like to now turn the meeting over to Stephen Mullowney, TRX Gold Chief Executive Officer. Stephen? Yeah, thank you, Christina. Before we begin the call today, I'd like to recognize that our founder and chairman passed away during the quarter, and during this year, and, you know, all of us here had a good relationship with Mr. Sinclair, and he'll be greatly missed. So with that, this is our 2023 year-end conference call. Obviously, we'll have an annual general meeting conference call in the new year as part of the annual general meeting. I'm quite excited for what we have in 2023. We had a significant amount of growth. We're really starting to see what the potential is for the Buckreef Gold Project. We had another plant expansion. We have another one underway. We're getting a much better sense for the geological potential of the property and are quite excited for that, and where that can go over time, particularly, hopefully, increase the resources on our property quite significantly, as well as continuing to increase the production profile of the property as well. So 2023 was a great year. We're quite excited for today's call and for where we're going as a company as well. So obviously, there's a cautionary note. We will be talking about forward-looking statements, so I'd ask everyone to go to our website and our corporate presentation to read the cautionary note. Today's speakers, obviously, you have myself, we have Andrew, you can raise your hand, our COO here in Toronto. We have Mike, our CFO, here with me as well, and Christina is joining us from Montreal. So TRX, a lot of you will hear this in in our presentations. We're a very growing company. We have experienced management team that continues to deliver a rapid growth, both on the production side, specifically on the production side, and we have a exciting blue sky potential on our property and the growth resources over time. So the Buckreef Gold Project, just to give everybody a reminder, the Buckreef Gold Project. Right now, we have under the 2020 resource statement, 2 million ounces in the Measured and Indicated category at around 1.8 grams a ton. As a lot of you know, the deposit does come to surface, and it's relatively flat, and it's a vertical shear zone, so it's easily mineable. The widths are around 20 meters, easy metallurgy, and grind crush CIL, in the oxide ore. As we'll get into in this presentation, which was very exciting during the year, is our results around the sulfide ore, which continue now to be moved into the mine plan and processed. We are fully permitted to grow as large as we can. Our permit has been extended to 2032, and it's renewable for the life of the deposit. The processing plant and mine consistently are meeting production guidance. We have a minimal environmental footprint. We recycle all water. We have good tailings management. We're connected to national power grid, and we adhere to all international standards around environmental standards and a good ESG program as well. We have exceptional exploration potential, which hopefully will mean that this mine life goes on for a considerable period of time, and with a Special Mining License, we can do that. With regards to the 2023 highlights, there was a lot of growth. As we, as a management team, have told market participants, is our goal now is to predominantly self-fund operation and manage capital, your capital, with minimal dilution, and I think we've achieved that in 2023. We generated record revenue, operating cash flow, and Adjusted EBITDA, with a great profit margin. Mike will get into the statistics now in a minute. Then predominantly reinvested that right back into the business to continue to grow it. So I think this is the first year that we've been able to execute on that business plan, and with the expansion that is to occur in the next 3-6 months, then that's gonna be enable us to have even more cash flow to reinvest back into the business and the business potential, both on a production profile basis as well as on a resource expansion basis. So in 2023, we executed on the 1,000 ton per day plant. It came in on time and on budget for $6.4 million. We are now going through another mill expansion, which will increase the throughput capacity by 75%-100%. The production capacity will be dependent on the grade that will go through that, and we'll give more guidance on that in the future. We're also unlocked the whole deposit, particularly the Buckreef Main Zone, because everything we're talking about here right now is Buckreef Main. So we're not talking about Anfield or Eastern Porphyry or other exploration targets on the property. The sulfide ore has gone through the mill. We did a bulk sample. It continues to go through the mill today. What we're in the process of doing now is, and this is normal operational sort of things with regards to processing plants, is what's the right mix of oxides and sulfides to go through to get an appropriate, more balanced recovery rate over time and over the life of the project? That all has to do with, you know, suspensions and things like that, that the metallurgists get really into. In 2023, we've extended the known mineralization around our Main Zone by 500 meters, and we've also had discovery of the Anfield zones and continue to work on figuring out where to go next, Andrew. You'll get into that- I will ... in about 10-20 minutes on how you're going to go about blocking and tackling a good exploration program, particularly as this new plant comes on board and expand, hopefully expand the life of the deposit. So with that, I plan to hand over to Mike, and he will go through the financial results for 2023. Thank you, Stephen. Good morning, everyone, thanks for joining us. As Stephen touched on, that it was a record year operationally for us at TRX. We produced almost 21,000 ounces on the year. That was in line with our full year guidance of 20-25,000 ounces, and that was after us having brought the 1,000-ton-a-day plant online back in October of last year. We sold all of what we produced during the year at an average realized price of $1,845 an ounce for the full year. You can see in Q4, gold prices exceeded $1,900 an ounce, and are now trading beyond $2,000 an ounce. In fact, this morning, we were up over 2,050, so, record levels and, certainly suggest record growth going into next year. In terms of, financials, the record production drove record financial results as well. As, Stephen touched on, we had record revenues of over $38 million. Our cost of sales came in at just over $20 million, which meant a gross profit of over $18 million or almost 50%, so a very cost-effective, a high-margin operation. We had record net income of $7 million, EBITDA of almost $14 million, and importantly, operating cash flow over $17 million, which got reinvested back into the business, and I'll touch on that. But again, for investors who've been tracking this story, you know, this is, this is the third year of growth, since we've come on board. It's been year-over-year-over-year growth, and we certainly expect this growth to continue into next year as we expand to 2,000 tons a day. On the cash cost side, we recorded cash costs of $904 an ounce for the full year. Now, this was above the high end of our previously guided range of $750-$850 an ounce. And this was primarily due to higher-than-expected processing costs that we incurred in Q4. There's a couple of reasons for that, that we called out in our MD&A, one of which was higher-than-expected maintenance costs. We ended up encountering a mill motor failure on one of our ball mills that required some unexpected maintenance, and that was coupled with an overhaul of our crushing circuit. So there was roughly a $30 an ounce variance for unplanned maintenance that we expect to normalize into next year. And secondly, in Q4, we experienced inconsistent, unstable power from the TANESCO power grid. What that meant was we ended up using higher-than-expected gen sets power, which consumed fuel at a higher rate than what we had previously forecasted or budgeted, and that led to about an $18-an-ounce impact on full-year cash costs. Importantly, we have since been reconnected to a new substation that is substantially closer to Buckreef. This substation is about 60 km away from Buckreef, where the previous substation was over 250 km away from Buckreef. We got connected to that grid in November, and we've seen consistent grid power over the last few weeks and consequently expect costs to be lower heading into next year. We'll talk about guidance in a moment, but suggest lower costs year-over-year. I guess the last bullet I'll touch on, as Stephen mentioned at the outset, our mantra is using organically generated cash flow to reinvest back into the operation around value-accretive activities. We took that $17-$18 million of operating cash flow that we generated, put it right back into the business. As we've touched on many times, we expanded the plant from 360 tons a day to 1,000 tons a day. We're on our way towards 2,000 tons a day, having already procured a mill. We've set ourselves up for this growth by expanding our tailings storage facility to accommodate the higher production volumes. Again, we look at additional infrastructure, capital assets. We're doing long-term studies, all in an effort to support the long-term growth of this business and doing what we said we would do, reinvesting cash flow in a value-accretive way. Next slide, please. Excellent. Well, thank you, Michael. That, that's great. You know, the financial metrics are improving significantly, and we continually expect those financial metrics to improve into this year, which we'll get into guidance again. And these are... I think it's fair to say, projects that, you know, you get it going, and then you're able to expand it much more quickly over time. So it's almost like pushing a snowball off a hill. It gets bigger and bigger and bigger as it goes down that hill, and it gets easier to do. Yeah, so we're quite excited for that, and one of those factors is the sulfides. So we were in an extremely wet season last year. It was raining, I think it was once in a hundred years or something like that, Andrew? That's right. In regards to the rainfall- Yes ...in the spring. And so, you know, when you're into that environment, hard rock is easier to process than oxide rock because hard rock is not as sticky, doesn't have clay in it, and sulfides, and sorry, oxides do. So we pivoted a little bit to the sulfides to see how they would work. They worked out just fine. I believe, the 2019 or 2020 metallurgical study- Twenty. Yeah, 2020 preliminary metallurgical study said that we should get, you know, recovery rates in the mid- to high 80s%. That's what we experienced when we put the mill feed through our mill. And subsequently, that will go into the long-term mine planning now and into the current mine planning. So this is significant because 90% of the resources on the Buckreef Main Zone are in sulfides. And we are hitting the sulfides. Who's that on top of the of the in the pit there, Andrew, on top of the harder rock? Oh, that's Pascal. That's our senior mining engineer- Yeah ... who is clearly demarcating the sulfides, which you can see. You can see it's competent rock. It's that kinda gray color, and that particular block is actually running at 5.8 grams a ton. So Andrew, take the picture on the bottom. Can you take the investors through what they're really seeing in the pit? Because you can see the transition zone, you can see the oxide zones, and you can see the starting sulfide zones. That's right, Stephen, and thank you very much and good morning to everybody. So in the photograph on the bottom, obviously, if you look at the pit itself, you'll see the top part of the very top part of the pit, you'll see the brown layer. That is our topsoil, and then we go to sort of the ochre orange colors, that is our oxide zone. It's about 20-25 meters thick. And then if you just look right at the back of the bottom of the pit, you'll see the gray rock, and that is our sulfide zone. So we've started to expose the sulfides in the very deepest part of our pit, which is what you've been talking about here with our bulk sample. Yeah, exactly. So onto the next slide, the 2,000 ton per day mill expansion. So as I've explained to lots of investors over time, we are on a pay-as-you-go program. And what does a pay-as-you-go program mean? It means that as the business generates cash, it will be reinvested into the business to grow it. So that essentially means that timelines can move up and timelines can move backwards, depending on hitting targets. So as Mike mentioned, in Q4, we ran into power issues, which have subsequently been resolved, and we also had a motor go down, which was really related to power issues from bus. So we didn't hit the production profile, although we hit the year-end guidance, we were a little bit behind on where we were ideally hopeful to get into. So that has delayed in the pay-as-you-go program, the mill expansion a little bit, but not a lot. And so we expect this project to come on board in the first half of fiscal 2024. The mill is on site. The other long lead items have been ordered. We are going to expand, and this is a little bit of a switch from what I explained previously. The crushing circuit will be expanded first to over 2,000 tons a day. That will enable us to put in place a expanded crush stockpile, which will give us more consistent mill feed. And I'm hopeful, and I'll be pushing the team to get over 1,000 tons a day while they, while we have that crushing system up and running. We haven't budgeted for that, but that's the goal. And then subsequently to that, the rest of the system will come online, including the electrical works. The plinth will be poured soon. That's a long lead item on the ball mill, and all the other parts and tanks and things of that nature will come in thereafter. So capital cost of the mill expansion is around $6 million. That's gonna be funded through existing cash resources. Obviously, we've got a big ore stockpile, and go forward, sales and bank financing, which we're always in conversations around. And we're gonna build this in a 100% Tanzanian way, just as we built the previous mill expansions and expect it to, you know, come in and work just as well as the existing plants have worked. We don't anticipate any problems in the ramp-up of this expansion plant because we're producing 1,000 tons a day, really doubling it. Ironically, this year, the mining rates don't need to increase to accommodate this in this year's budgets, so we're good on that angle. And the tailings facility, as you can see down in the bottom, is constructed. There need to be a couple lifts, but that's straightforward. And you can see the procurement and fabrication on site of various other components around the mill expansion. And I expect the investors here will have quite a few questions on that as we get to the end of the presentation. But now on to the excitement, that's expansion. I know everybody wants to understand how are we gonna take this physical assets in processing capacity, and we're obviously gonna continue to grow it after we get to 2,000 tons a day. But how are we gonna feed it? And where are all the resources gonna come so we can have a long, long, long mine life here? Andrew, over to you. Thank you, Stephen. Thank you, Mike. And as you know, I always particularly like this slide. We're gonna be here for a few minutes, folks, and do bear with me. As you can see, we did have a program that was just under 7,000 meters of drilling, including infill sterilization and pure exploration. As Stephen already mentioned, that we've been able to extend known mineralization to the north, a little bit deeper. To the south, it's right underneath the South Pit, about 500 meters there, to the northeast and southwest and at depth. And we've also been able to get some exploration results through the drill bit now on the Anfield and Eastern Porphyry, which has confirmed that multiple zones of strong mineralization that are subparallel and in close proximity to the Buckreef Main Zone. This is a very, very important opportunity for future mineral resources. Why do I say that? The way to sort of secure continuous increases in throughput is probably to have several pits available to us. We'll have the main pit, we'll have the South Pit. In time, we will also be going underground, and I think this is the first time you've heard me talking about this deposit will go underground. Through our geological work, we have been able to delineate and define 2-3 high-grade shoots, and so I'm very confident to say this deposit will go underground, and that also talks to a much longer life of mine. But multiple pits, Main Zone, South Pit, and then Anfield and Eastern Porphyry. That gives us optionality and time continuity of mining. I'm just gonna pause you there, Andrew, for a sec before you get into that. So why don't you explain to the investors when you determine how you switch from open pit to underground and the importance of strip ratio in that? Yeah ... just so the investors can understand- Sure how you make that economic decision. Yeah, it's a really, really good question, Stephen. It's also a very, very important part in, Yes ... mine planning and scenarios that we're currently in the middle of doing. So once the strip ratio gets, say, high, maybe 6, 7-to-1, or that kind of number, it becomes more economical to go underground, and we have to find those high-grade shoots. And when we go underground, we also will be mining at a higher grade- Yeah ... over those 20-30 meters. Those widths we have make for very economical mining in the underground environments in the stoping that we'll be doing. So it will be a cost trade-off- Yeah ... between strip ratio, so ore tons plus the waste we have to mine, versus the development that we have to put in place to go mine the stopes underground. Given we have a vertical deposit- Perfect ... as you go out and you go deeper, you have to strip out, and you have to get your walls- Yeah ... angled properly. Given that we're vertical and 20 meters wide, this deposit is very susceptible, and good rock continuity. Yeah. It's very susceptible to underground mining, and it probably will be cheaper over time to underground mining than open pit. It will be, and also the quality of the rock underground, we've seen already from- Yeah ... preliminary reports, is very good. I can also talk from my own background as an underground miner, that the rock is very, very good for underground mining. So we won't need to see, as we were talking about this morning, all kinds of underground steel supports that add up to the cost because we got very competent rock where you put bolts and mesh in. That's right. We won't. Yeah. Just as a quick comment, you know, we are mining through some very, very small amounts of old stopes from the old days. It's in the reports, and those stopes are, and that development has stayed open for over 40 years. They haven't collapsed? No. It is, still, still there. Yeah, I saw a picture of that the other day. That's an important point- Um ... how the old stopes have been there for 40 years. They've been flooded, not, you know, dried up. We pumped them out, and they're still very intact. That's correct. Yeah. Okay. Yeah, it's been very good. So perhaps very quickly, one of the highlights for, and I've... Of course, you'd expect me just to choose two of my favorite, and I have. On the Eastern Porphyry, what have we seen here? Our best result here was 14 meters great width at 3.5 grams a ton, including 3 meters at just under 11. And do note that that is from 27 meters below surface. So it's very, very close to the surface. In addition to that, we've got the Anfield Zone, so it's about another 1.5 kilometers away. We intersected 2.9 meters at 13.7 grams a ton, and again, quite shallow, from 43 meters. Some of the investors that have been with us for a couple of years, you might, and I think it's the end of the presentation, though, Christina, we still have the picture of a guy holding a rock, and that is from the Anfield Zone. So we drilled that position, and here we are, just under 3 meters at nearly 14 grams a ton. A great result very early in the program. I, I still remain very, very bullish on that overall trend. And then underneath the South Pit, we've been very pleasantly surprised by getting wide zones of mineralization at between 1-2 grams a ton, very similar to our main deposit. And we're, we're actually currently dewatering the South Pit, planning to get that back into the mine plan later this year. Excellent. Thank you, Stephen. So with regards to guidance for the year, obviously, as everyone knows in hearing the TRX story, we're able to build mills and capacity relative to the market extremely cheaply, Mike. Like, I don't see anybody able to put up a 2,000 ton per day plant. If we look at all the costs of that, including our expansions, it's less than $20 million. It's more around $16-$17 million. I'd challenge people to go and see where else that has been done for, because I haven't seen anything less than $50-$70 million for a similar type of asset in other parts of the world. I think we had studies suggesting as much. Yeah. This has been very capital efficient, to your point. Yeah, exactly. Yeah. And so we're gonna be doing that in this third mill expansion. The production guidance for the year is going to be 25,000-30,000 ounces. That's not the run rate of the 2,000 ton per day plant. That's a 1,000 ton per day plant operating for over the majority of the year and then the 2,000 ton per day plant coming online. So the 2,000 ton per day plant is higher than that guidance. Cash costs will come in at $800-$900 an ounce, as of next year. And again, we expect that to probably be a little bit lower when the full plant comes online as a run rate. Well, I might just make a couple of comments on that, Stephen. I mean, we talked about power and being connected to- Yeah ... a grid, a substation that's substantially closer to site, so expect, you know, some benefit that way. But importantly, we expect to receive significant economies of scale from- Yeah ... the larger plant. We've been telling investors this for quite some time. We don't need to expand the workforce substantially to grow from 1,000 to 2,000 tons a day. So inevitably, things like your processing cost per ton and your cash cost per ounce come down because you're able to use the existing workforce to produce twice the output. Yeah, exactly. So the numbers that we're presenting here are blended numbers between 1,000 ton and 2,000 tons a day. Yeah. And I might just make one final comment. You touched on our mantra, our pay as you go mantra, and we explained how, you know, to the extent there had been unexpected variances to the downside, like mill motor breakdowns or, you know, power connectivity issues, it can go the other way as well. Yeah. If the team's able to, you know, exceed some of the targets and guidance figures that we've put on the slide here, we'll move up some of that capital expenditure and try and bring that plan online ahead of time. Yeah, because when we look at the models, it makes sense to do that. Yeah, 100%. 100%. So it really makes sense to do that. So again, our business plan is pretty simple: produce gold, pay for exploration and drilling, pay for additional capital programs, and enhance our social license as we do that over time. That's the goal that we have in 2023. We're able to do it, and I'm hopeful that in 2024, we're able to do it again, and thereafter. So mindful ESG, when I see ESG, we are good corporate citizens. I've always said this, that a mine has a lot of inputs in mining, construction and capital costs, and things of that nature. Thus, as you can see in our operating costs, plus capital would be over 50% of the revenue because you gotta put capital expenditures in there, too. The biggest beneficiaries of that should be local people. We're able to do that, and we're 100% Tanzanian on site, and we procure as much as we can in Tanzania, and they are great workers and have done a good job in building out our assets. That helps to reduce local social risk. We also have artisanal miners in this area, around Buckreef, that is not abnormal for Tanzania or Africa, and we work with them, and we reinvest into schools and into health facilities. We have STAMICO as our joint venture partner, and the overall goal is to have a much more clean, smooth, and efficient operation as a result of utilizing as much local content as possible and adhering to the highest corporate governance as possible as well. Stephen, if I may, I mean, it substantially reduces supply chain risk as well. Yes. Yeah, it does. Yeah, and inflation risk- Yeah ... as well, what you're seeing in the Western world. So with regards to news flow upcoming, the mill expansion is underway. We will have an updated study or at least modeling of the Buckreef Gold Main Zone. So everything we've been talking about around production is Main Zone only. We have metallurgical and geotechnical studies underway currently that will feed into that, and then we need to give the market a much better sense of where this Main Zone can go and what our business plan is around increasing resources to have a much longer life project here at Buckreef. With regards to share price, over the last year or so, our share price relative to market participants, I believe, has held up decently well. We're in a cash position of $7.6 million as of August 31, 2023. As of today, we're a little bit above that, so we've been maintaining our liquidity profile in this, in this environment. And we're covered by three, you know, brokerages out of United States. I believe some of them are on this call, and will be asking questions. So we, all in all, I'd like to see a higher share price. Everybody always likes to see a higher share price. Tough market conditions, I think we're, we're weathering the storm fairly well, but ultimately, we do want to make sure that we get to a higher share price over time. We, we believe that we can do that by driving the current business plan. It may take time because we're on a pay-as-you-go program. It could move up or could move back a little bit. Now I'd like to hand it back to Christina and the operator for any questions. As you can see from our slide, and a lot of participants would have seen this slide, always a lot of activity happening at Buckreef. Thank you, Stephen. Thank you. Thank you. If you wish to join the question queue, please click the Q&A icon on the left-hand side of the screen. You will see options to raise your hand to join the question queue and ask your question verbally or write a question to submit your question in writing. When you are introduced, your line will automatically be unmuted. Analysts who have dialed in on the conference call may wish to press Star, then one on your telephone keypad to join the question queue. Our first question is from Heiko Ihle with H.C. Wainwright & Co.. Please go ahead. Mr. Ihle, your line is open. ... Can you hear me? Yeah, I can hear you. Yeah, I can hear you. Good morning. Wonderful. Okay, apparently, when it says your microphone is open, you still have to click that button. Okay, fair enough. Sorry about that. Your press release, you stated, quote, "Lower cash costs are expected in the second half of next year once the ramp-up is complete and the processing plant achieves steady state." Can you maybe quantify the lower cash costs that you think we might see? I assume there is some sort of modeling you've done. And then also, just conceptually, would it be fair to take the first half of the year at the higher end, the $900 mark of your range, and then assume the second half will be closer to the lower end of the range? Or is the delta even bigger in a way that the first half is over the $900 and the second half below the $800? Mike? Yeah, I mean, we've obviously not guided to that level of detail quite yet, Heiko, but, you know, inevitably, as I mentioned, we expect to realize economies of scale as we move towards 2,000 tons a day. So certainly expect, you know, Q4 to be amongst the lowest cost quarter once the 2,000 ton a day plant hits its steady state capacity. But I think the way you're thinking about it is right. You know, the front end of the year will be towards the higher end of the range, and the back end of the year towards the lower end, and certainly average out over the course of the year. Okay. In your internal model, the 2,000 ton a day processing plant, when planned... When do you think that will become cash flow positive on a monthly basis? Is there any sort of modeling that's been done? Q4. But monthly? When you say monthly, Heiko, you mean, is it cash flow positive on a monthly basis or Q4? Which month is more money coming out than going in? I'd say the start of Q4 is the expectation, if it comes online in Q3. So in our case, that's probably, probably June. Okay. Yeah, so Heiko, the way this is working and, and is, it's always operating cash flow positive, and significantly operating cash flow positive. It's just that operating cash flow is being reinvested into CapEx to build it out. And, and so it will, once the new plant comes online, obviously, we're moving, we're using all operating cash flow to bring this plant on as quickly as possible, or predominantly most of it. So it'll be, you know, based on the current schedule, it'll be built and commissioned and sort of ramping up over the course of Q3, and then fully operational towards the start of Q4, at which point it starts generating excess cash. Quite a bit. Yes. Yeah. Okay. I'll get back in queue. Thanks for your time. Thanks, Heiko. Thank you. Thank you, Heiko. The next question is from Jake Sekelsky with Alliance Global Partners. Please go ahead. Hey, guys. Congrats on the strong year, and thanks for taking my questions. Thanks, Jake. Good morning. Good morning. Just, just building on Heiko's question a bit in the ramp to 2,000 tons a day, are you able to touch on the anticipated grade profile at the higher levels of throughput? I mean, is it gonna be similar to what we've seen over the last year or so? Any color there would be helpful. Do you want to comment on what the grade profile looks like this year? Yeah. So, Jake, as we get to the 2,000 tons a day, you'll see a little bit of pullback on the grade. There's two reasons for that. Obviously, we are fast-tracking the high grade so that we can build the plant. As a result of that, we end up with a medium to lower grade stock pile, which is available for us to process. Of course, we won't be incurring the mining costs on that because it's already mined. So expect to see some pullback on the grade in the final quarter. Okay, that's helpful. And then just looking out over the medium term, you know, looking at additional expansions beyond the 2,000 ton a day plant, do you expect to continue to scale gradually like you have been? Or do you think you might try and step up to call it, you know, the 100,000 ounce a year range in a single expansion scenario? Yeah, so that's, you know, we're prepared to do it both ways, as long as it makes valuation sense from a shareholder perspective. So, you know, right now, as I mentioned, the cost of us able to build these plants has been very good. We are aware of where to get plants that can get us there quicker, and so it then it comes down to a financing question around the capital requirements for that versus the pay-as-you-go program. And the ability of bringing in external sources of financing, such as, you know, bank finance, project finance, those sort of things would need to be procured if you were to go a lot quicker. But, but certainly, I think we're gonna look at that, and we're gonna go in the most shareholder accretive fashion. Our goal is to have the highest NAV per share that we can, the highest EBITDA per share, those type of metrics, in doing that evaluation for the expansion project. And we're currently going under that. You know, looking at some of that analysis now, Jake, and it will be done in that fashion. But certainly, that option will be fully on the table if it makes sense for shareholders. ... Okay, and then just, just timing for that, I mean, it sounds like you're, you're looking at, at both options now. Is that something we might see news on in the first quarter or toward the middle of next year? I would suspect that's gonna be more towards the middle of next year, in looking at that. And just because, you know, we put a particular type of scenario into the market, we always adjust if it makes sense. So it can change over that particular period of time, and we're getting now as we get a good feel of the asset, and it's taken us a while to do that. Now that we have a really good feel of the asset, we should be able to get sort of any pivots into the market a lot quicker. Got it. Okay, that's all for me. Thanks again. Thanks, James. The next question is from Mike Niehuser with Roth MKM. Please go ahead. Good morning. Can you hear me okay? Yeah, I can hear you, Mike. How are you? Good morning, Mike. Great. Thank you. I just wanna congratulate you on your discipline, Stephen, since you've come on, and particularly over the last year, how almost the, you know, the operating cash flow equals your investment. It's, it's pretty, pretty clear that, you know, you're keeping to putting all the money back into the project and really pushing it out in all directions, it appears. So, most of my questions were answered on either your presentation or the other analysts, but if I could just throw out, kind of re-ask in a general way to get a little bit more comment, I would appreciate it, if you don't mind. One thing you mentioned was the gold price and cost in Tanzania. How significant, you know, from a U.S. or, you know, U.S., North America perspective, how do you look at the benefit of working in Tanzania from an operating cost basis? Yeah, I would say, look, we have this debate a lot between, well, I guess the market does, between what is a Tier 1 jurisdiction. And, you know, I, I look at Tanzania in the case of the social infrastructure's in place. So what, what does that mean? It means that you can get qualified people to run and operate your business, and that have good experience in mining, world-class mining operations elsewhere, particularly throughout Africa, and come back home. So the educational system is in place for, for that. Also, the skilled labor is in place to, to build tanks and plants and electrical works and all that, and so that's very important as well in building out an operation. There's lots of contract miners. Remember, we haven't bought a fleet to do our mining here. We, we 100% contract mining. And then you have the cost profile of just what labor cost in Tanzania versus elsewhere, what electricity cost. Obviously, fuel is a world product versus a local product, and so you have to accept you're a cost taker on that front. So I would say, in our experience, we've had a very positive experience in operating in Tanzania versus some of the risks that you have in the supposed Tier 1 jurisdictions of cost overruns, labor disputes. A lot of, you know, assets in North America have been picked over, so you get into operational issues, too, on recovery rates and things of that nature. So, you know, with regards to operating in Tanzania, it's been nothing but a positive experience. A lot of the noise that you do hear from a Tanzanian perspective is at the national government level in Dodoma. So I kind of separate what's in the press versus the actual operating experience on the ground a little bit, because we manage the Dodoma atmosphere quite well, and that's easier to manage than the operational aspects of things on the ground. So on the ground, it's been, you know, very good. At the Dodoma level, too, it's been extremely good. Thus far, it's been a good experience. Did I answer? It's a good answer. Yeah. I can illustrate with one very good example, Mike. You know, the reference is made to the old power line being somewhat unreliable. We approached the regional commissioner, the Mining Commission, said, "Hey, like, you know, this is just not working for us as well as we'd like." And in no short order, we were put onto another power line, which is extended just a matter of a few kilometers. And now, as of November, we've been having substantially better power reliability. Yeah, TANESCO built that line. They built that line? We didn't pay for that line. Yeah. But then again, the ability to work with the government was very much there. Yeah. They want to see this be a big, big producer, yeah, at the end of the day. Yeah. Lots of royalties, lots of jobs, and economic activity around it. Yeah. That's their goal, like ours. Yeah, and Stephen, the other way to think of things as we continue to work in Tanzania, so we're consistently de-risking the project. Well, that's a very complete answer. It made me want to follow up. I think that, isn't the... I was curious with your comment of also about going underground, and I'm not fully familiar with Buzwagi, but I think that was shutting down and, is that an underground mine or an open pit? And, could you talk about, you know, your timing with going underground and how that's gonna impact culture, at least on an operating level? Yeah, so it's a good question, Mike. Look, at the end of the day, we're talking about Buckreef Main Zone right now. So I fully expect my gut feel, and I'm pretty confident in it, is this will be underground Buckreef Main with pits and satellite pits all over the property. That's right. And so that will be ultimately where this hopefully forms out. Obviously, there's some exploration and drilling to do that, because, you know, I personally don't like having people go and dig up the earth where there's no gold, and lots of projects do that, so it does need to be drilled. And so ultimately, that is the case on Buck Reef Main, as you're familiar, it is a vertical deposit. It is quite wide, so you're not gonna take a lot of dilution on mining of that. It will make sense to go underground. I like underground, and it reduces your footprint on surface, and it's easier to manage things like security risk when you're underground versus being in an open pit environment. So I, you know, over time, I think the project gets de-risked more by going underground than staying open pit. Yeah. Tailings too, all environmental factors as well, gates, backfill, all happens with underground. Well, I imagine this year, as you say, you know, you're still 100% focused on mining Buckreef Main. But by the end of the year, with you coming on with the additional ball mill in the last quarter, you're probably gonna be really leaning heavily into making sure there's enough mine development from either Buckreef Main, underground to the south or these other pits, to make sure that it's fed and with more growth in mind. I know it's too early to say, but how do you see prioritizing the resource development outside of Buckreef Main? Yeah, we do rank these, Mike. I can quickly answer. Well, I actually, I think the question goes into... So the priority right now is expansion, taking that cash flow expansion into a robust exploration program- That's right ... which Andrew has delineated the targets of where we believe to be most prospective around the property. Did I get that right? You got that right. And, again, Mike, you know, you look at the slide that we have, the Anfield Zone is only about 200-250 meters to the east of our Main Zone. Very early stages, we've got some spectacular grade results there. If you remember, just over 3 meters at 14 grams a ton. That's sitting in a much broader zone of mineralization as well. But, you know, you're asking priorities, you obviously go for the most attractive results to start off with. I missed the last sentence you said. You go after the most attractive results, and that's why I put them up there, Mike, is Eastern Porphyry and Anfield- Okay. Thank you. Our main focus. Yeah. And then the south extensions of the main pits. Excellent. That's very helpful. So really, you know, for the dense analysts like myself, and it'll become more apparent as we move through the year, that you know, the priorities will naturally emerge. Um, yeah. Well, that's pretty much the questions I had. I just wanted to say one more thing about Jim Sinclair, to add is that, you know, his involvement in Tanzania back to Sutton really was, you know, making him, you know, not just Mr. Gold, but Mr. Tanzania in terms of bringing exploration to this part of the country. And I'm sure he was very pleased with your activities in the last year, and probably do a great deal of pride from it. But I'll stop there, and thanks for taking my questions. Yeah, thank you. Thank you, Mike. All the best. Thanks, Mike. The next question is from Craig Sutherland with Conceptual Solutions Limited. Please go ahead. Good morning. Can you hear me? We can hear you just fine, Craig. Good morning, Craig. Okay, very good. Good morning, guys. Majority of the questions I had have already been answered, but first and foremost, congratulations on the progress. It's really been amazing to see how much you guys have fast-tracked this, in a way that we were all hoping for. But I guess the question that I had was, our focus is on the Buckreef Main, but also now looking out into future possibilities, like you said, with Anfield and the Eastern Porphyry. Are you identifying anything beyond gold in your drilling or what you're looking for, such as silver, copper? Are there any other possibilities that would increase the value of the property or not change the scope, but enhance the scope as we go forward, do the geologicals and the rest? Yeah. So currently what we're seeing is in our Doré bars, there's only a, a small portion of silver here, because you do pick that up in the, in the processing, and there's, a small, little amount of copper. We're not seeing anything in the assay results that would indicate that this could be a copper-gold project, for instance. It's just not that type of geological formation. Andrew, you want to get into that just a little bit deeper, please? Yeah. No, we're in a, an Archean greenstone system. It's predominantly gold. Yeah. Stephen, you summarized it. There's a little bit of silver that comes with it, but this is a gold play. It's a gold play, and in the region, it's almost all gold plays as well. Good. Good, good, good. That's, that's it for me. Everything else has been answered. So, Yeah ... again, continued success to all of you, and very happy with the progress. Thank you. Thank you, Craig. The next question is from Stephen Reiser with a family office. Please go ahead. Stephen Reiser? Stephen, are you- Mr. Reiser, are you able to unmute your line? It's showing unmuted on our end. Okay. Hi, can you hear me? Yes, we can. Yeah. Thanks. Go ahead, Steve. ... A little bit of technical, let's say, glitches there to work through. Firstly, I, too, wanna congratulate the team on the strong effort for 2023, in terms of the cleaning up the balance sheet, increasing production, the exploration work, and of course, the very strong stewardship of shareholder capital and funds. That's clearly evident from the discussion. The question I wanted to ask the team is really centered on market positioning and customer acquisition, a little bit of the softer issues, in an environment where there really is tightened liquidity in the gold market industry and many miners that are competing for capital. From an asset manager standpoint, as you all will readily be aware, there will be some natural wariness to investing in Africa, particularly if you're a U.S. asset manager or hedge fund or family office, when there are, miners, like, for example, Snowline Gold or Hercules Silver in Vancouver and in, Idaho, for example, that have high intrinsic potential ounces, and, are in regions that might be perceived as easier to, work within. So I wanted to understand what the team is doing on one, in addition to the rhetorical discussions in the past on Africa, and that it's safe and one can drive the car successfully, what might be going on from a more structural standpoint to see reports or information published, even put on the website, that cast aside some of these concerns about Africa and Tanzania? And then secondarily, and related point, what's being done in terms of acquiring additional investors? I know that 15% institutional slice and the 15% friends, family, and officer slice have been fairly steady for a while, but given the intrinsic value of this firm, there is value in very strong programs to acquire additional investors and customers. So again, market positioning and then structural things to overcome perceptions that may exist about Tanzania and Africa, and also the active cultivation of really deep-pocket investors. Yeah, so thank you for the question, Steve. So with regards to the first risk around Tanzania, there's been a lot of progress at the government level toward foreign direct investment. As you're fully aware of, the former president, Magufuli, passed away just over two years ago. Mm-hmm. The new president is all about foreign direct investment. We've, you know, we've discussed the, you know, where the government is going on foreign direct investment and where it wants to go, and how Tanzania is improving as an investment jurisdiction. You're seeing it in the funds flows. I think we've had that in presentations before around the investments that Barrick is making. There was just recently a acquisition of OreCorp by Silvercorp. And we're starting to see a lot more investment in the infrastructure of Tanzania. You are correct, there's not a lot of that on our website, and, and as we've spoken before, we need to get that onto our website. A lot of the positive articles are around the, around Tanzania. I think in my conversations and the team's conversations with investors, that's starting to come through, with regards to seeing a reduced risk in the current administration in Tanzania versus the prior administration, and that is starting to resonate a little bit. I think you will see that come out in ratings around, such as the Fraser Institute and other ratings over time. Kinda similar. The analogy that I like to use is Ecuador 10 years ago, not a lot of investment. Today, kind of put up there with, with other jurisdictions. With regards to the acquisition of, basically what you're asking, is new shareholders. When we go through the shareholder registry, I do see a turnover in shareholders and, and new shareholders. I even see it in, you know... I just go down the screen here today and look at the participants that are here on this call versus the participants that would've been on a similar call last year. It's much more broad, and it's, you know, new priorities as well. And we, you know, as you're fully aware, I was in Switzerland last week. I did meet quite a few shareholders, and they didn't even realize we're shareholders because they would show up on the old list versus the new list. So, you know, those communications continue. We continue to have a lot of meetings and reach out to institutional investors and also large retail and family offices. So that continues. I would say that will ramp up significantly, too, as we start to formulate our more medium to longer-term business plans. I'm hopeful that once that is more formulated, we become more investable than we are currently today, and that has to do with, you know, you're seeing the tenets of that today with regards to talking about underground mining, Buckreef Main Zone, plant expansions. Today, if you were to try to look at what does 4,000 tons a day or 6,000 tons a day look like at Buckreef Main?... you couldn't answer that question. I can answer that question much better, but I don't have all the information on that yet, and that will be more into more knowns as we go forward here, which will enable people to put a valuation in a traditional mining sense onto the company. Does that kinda answer your question? Yes, it does. And certainly we're gonna be grateful and look forward for further fact-based insights on the site that dispel some of the perceptions that might exist for particularly Western asset managers about- Yeah - Tanzania and Africa. Yeah, and look, it's helpful too, Steve, that you have acquisitions of mining properties starting to occur in Tanzania as well. That means that, you know, there are larger sources of capital that aren't afraid to make investments there. You know, the OreCorp property, the envisioned CapEx for that is $500 million. So that's gonna be a large equity check there written by somebody. Sounds good. Thanks, Steve. Thank you all. The next question is from John Tumazos with John Tumazos Very Independent Research. Please go ahead. Thank you. Congratulations on the profits and progress. Thanks, John. Not at all. Good morning. Your press release is probably succinct, and may simplify. Is the 1,000 ton a day ball mill installation all that is necessary for the expansion, where excess mine capacity exists, and excess capacity exists in other parts of the process plant, flotation cells, et cetera, and tailings capacity exists, or are there other parts of the expansion underway, too? Yeah, so there, there's other parts of the expansion underway as well. So, the crushing circuit is being expanded first, and so that equipment should arrive on shore this month and then be going to Buckreef, so that's jaw crushers and things of that nature. The plinth needs to be built for the ball mill. That should be built this month as well. There's electrical components that need to come in, as a result of the expansion, and that's going to come online in the new year. The tank capacity does need to be expanded. We have a plan for that as well. That'll be locally done. And with regards to tailings, we do need, and I have, I've told lots of market participants, that after about two years, we do need a longer-term tailings plan. We are in the process of doing that, putting that together, looking at a lot of dry stack options, whether it's through dry stack tailings in filter presses. We're also looking at thickeners and all those sort of type of processes as we speak, to put that in place over time. But we can also, you know, expand our wet tailings facility, if so desired, in that period of time as well. So, rightfully, your question is right. I think we got all the components to that. On mining, we can maintain current mining rates to achieve our output. We did a lot of mining last year, and in our prior NI 43-101 said that opened up the deposit for the medium term, and that is the case. Just a point of clarity there, John, we don't, we don't have a flotation circuit at this time. In terms of, regional exploration, could you talk about what your drilling programs might be in 2025 and 2026, as the cash flow comes in from- Yeah ... the production or other uses of funds that may be priorities? Go ahead, Andrew. The regional program, you know, will develop over time, but certainly there's lots of gold in the region. If you would, maybe if I could ask us to go back, maybe, Stephen, just to the one slide of exploration. Yeah. Give me a second. Just, uh- I have to go on the Q&A. I can't, You can, you can scroll on the bottom there. Just go to one of the arrows. Yeah, there we go. There we go. John, it's a bit easier with this slide to talk about it. As you can see, the Main Zone with all the colors there in the center is very clear. Just to the immediate east of that, all those white dots. So far, we understand there's 3 zones over 3 kilometers, anchored in the northeast, with the Eastern Porphyry deposit, which is still open to the northeast, and in the south by an intermittent mining operation by some locals and a Chinese group. There is so little drilling in that, but there's so much opportunity that we have to test. Outside of that, you can see some additional red arrows. I'll start off with the east. We've identified another trend just off to the east. There you can see that red set of arrows. You'll notice also that it's on the same trend as both the Eastern Porphyry, Anfield, and the Main Zone. And similarly, if I then take your eye over to the extreme west or the left, again, we've identified through field work an additional two trends there. So 25, 26, there's no shortage of targets to go and drill on that.... broadly in the region, as you would expect, and I always like to use the phrase, John, we obviously keeping track of who's who in the zoo around us, and as opportunities arise there, and so there may be some further activity. Yeah, a lot of guys have approached us, too. You know, so like- Yeah ... when I think through this, and as I said, this business plan will develop more fully over time, is once the processing plant is up and running, is there a hub and spoke model that can be had here? Because there's a lot of high-grade, smaller- Yeah ... type of pits. And when you think about successful companies that done that, Calibre is one that comes to mind, and... And the graphite ... in Nicaragua. So, you know, that's it, it's a human capital resource constraint at this point in time, but certainly that we need to focus on the processing plant first, what's on our property second, and then go and look to how that all integrates into the region. Yeah, we have, you're quite right, Stephen. We have also been receiving, John, inbounds, which we assess both locally and within Eastern Africa. If I could ask one more. As gold rises above $2000, probably other projects advance in Tanzania. The graphite industry is also active in East Africa. Are there shortages of skilled labor or any inputs to production? Yeah, so on, on that, on the inputs, we've been good thus far. On, on skilled labor, where I think there is some, and I think this is a global thing versus a just Tanzanian thing, there is a lack of highly skilled mining engineers. And that's more of a global shortage than it is a Tanzanian shortage, and we supplement our mining engineer skill set with, you know, professional services firms and individuals, and supplement that with site. But with regards to the other disciplines around metallurgists and geologists, we haven't seen a shortage in that skill set or a shortage of skilled labor in Tanzania to execute. I would say there's excess supply of those skills in Tanzania, but the one that is shortage, and that's global, is mining engineers. Yeah. I think to say also, John, we have been able to attract key people, and we also have a very modest turnover. Is- Yeah. Yeah. So we've been able to retain very well those that we wish to retain. Yeah, and I think, you know, when you're in a growing project, it's easier to attract and retain people as well. So as long as we continue to grow and pay people well, then we should be okay in that regard on the HR side. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, John. See you later this month. I think we may have some text— I'd now like to hand... Oh, yes, sorry. I was just gonna hand it over to you, Stephen, for questions in writing. So we don't have any text questions, Mike. I'll just hit Q&A maybe. There are. You just need to click on the text column in the Q&A. Right at the top here, yes. Can people, Gaylene, can people see the questions, or should we read them out? No, they cannot see them. Okay, so Stephen, maybe you can read the question. Yeah, I'll read the question. So, we have from a private investor, and I think this comes. I get asked this question all the time, and it's a question from the past. Is there a realistic possibility to get future dividends paid in physical gold? Right now, in the short to medium term, I would say that that is not something that we are looking at. As you're aware, we, the Tanzanian government does put a royalty on gold. It does track its gold fairly closely, and we have a joint venture partner in the government of Tanzania through STAMICO. So I don't see a dividend in short to medium term in physical gold. The second question from the individual is, based on the great exploration numbers the board presented, would you agree with my personal opinion that there's a high possibility TRX Gold has about 5-10 million ounces of gold under the ground? So obviously, we are traded on the public markets. That would be a personal opinion versus a fact-based opinion at this point in time. You know, we do need to do a lot of work on the exploration potential of this property to drill that out to 5-10 million ounces. Personally, I'm hopeful that that property will come to that sort of level. Andrew is hopeful that the property will come- Yeah ... to that sort of level, but it does need to be proven out through the drill bit. That's correct, Stephen. It's very much a personal opinion. I would say again, we've had very positive early results. Yeah. There is no shortage of exploration potential on our Special Mining License. Exactly, but it does need to be proven out. There's a lot of drilling to be done, but that's the name of the game. That's the name of the game, yeah. Yeah. So, the next question is, when do you expect to bring out an updated Indicated and Inferred Resources report? How would you describe... Okay, so there are two questions there. So with regards to updated Indicated and Inferred Resources report, what we're doing is looking at what is the economic potential of the Buckreef Main Zone, and as part of that, there would be an update on resources that are currently in the Buckreef Main Zone. Yeah. Have I got that correct? Yeah ... Andrew? Yeah. So that is expected to come out in the first half of fiscal 2024.... Yes. Yeah, by June. How would you describe- Sorry, calendar. Calendar, yeah. Yeah, so not fiscal. Yeah, sorry, calendar. Yes. So the next question to that is: how would you describe the current relationship with the Tanzanian government? Since there were rumors, some rumors of the old aggressive Tanzanian president not being so friendly to foreign investors. And I think we did, you know, and in Stephen Reiser's question, we did answer this. The current relationship is good. We have a good relationship with the mining minister and the old mining minister as well, who's now the vice prime minister. We have a good relationship with the permanent secretary. We have a good relationship with the Mining Commission and with our joint venture partner. The reality is, in countries in Africa, if you put an asset into production, you continue to grow it, you become a good taxpayer, become a good employer, have a good reputation, you generally have a good relationship with the government. They wanna see the asset grow just as much as we would, and that's in, you know what I'll say, aggressive regimes and more not so aggressive regimes. You're right, the old president was not as friendly to foreign investors. When we started, and I came on board with the old president in power, and as soon as we started to build the asset, that relationship was fine. So, you know, I think they... You know, I've often said this to people, is when you go into foreign countries, and I've been to a lot of them, and I've done business in a lot of them, particularly in my prior role of managing government relationships, both on the government side and on the investor side, the world is open. And so what does that mean? Everybody has a smartphone, everybody has an internet connection, everybody has access to the same information, which wasn't the case 30 years ago. And so in that, and then a lot of the people now are very mobile and are educated in the same educational institutions, particularly in the West. As long as you have a fair, open, and transparent relationship, generally you have a good relationship, and that's the approach that we've been, we've been taking. Well, I think, you know, you talked about foreign direct investment, Stephen. It's fairly well-publicized, but one of the key metrics the new government has put into place is growing mining as a percentage of GDP. That's correct. They put in some targets and numbers around that. Certainly a new regime, and to Stephen's point, we're getting along well, and as long as we continue to execute, don't expect that to change. Yeah. So the next question is: when and how are shareholders going to be rewarded? So markets go up, markets go down, markets sometimes are good, markets are sometimes bad. And what's within our control is not so much what the markets are, what the markets value companies at. It's what's in the control of us is to reach out to as many investors as possible, put forward a story to as many investors as possible, but also come up to a business plan that is investable, and a business plan that could survive those ups and downs from a market perception. I think we've managed to do that. That was one of my... I was asked this a lot over the last couple of weeks, is: why did you go with the business plan you went with? A lot of people don't realize, but a large part of my education is in economics. There is a full realization that interest rates could never be at zero forever. They never were in the history of mankind. When interest rates go up, generally valuations go down. It's a pretty simple equation. Liquidity usually dries up as well, and the ability to access capital usually dries up with it. So you need to have in place a business plan that will survive those ups and downs. In a junior explorer, I can tell you, when I joined, the business plan would not have survived this market. Today, the business plan does survive this market. It's predominantly a self-funding operation. We wanted to slow it down and build up liquidity, and we could. We don't see that as being necessary at this point in time, but the business plan can survive this type of market. And over time, as the business grows out, its cash flow profile, its EBITDA profile, and its resource profile, then shareholders should ideally get rewarded from that growth. So the next question I have is: I hope investors who were part of this from the beginning could be made whole again. I am in good shape, but feel those who got into the vision when TRE was trading at the all-time lows and highs. I appreciate the progress that you've made. And I address this in almost all presentations: the management team came on board just over three years ago. I believe we've moved the project forward since that point in time. That business plan is much different than the original business plan of being a royalty company and predominantly an exploration co. It has a different risk profile associated with it. I would say it's probably a little bit less risky today than it was before. And markets, when TRE was at its high, markets on gold were extremely bullish. We don't have that same bullishness in the market today, and if that bullishness were to come back, then hopefully we'll trade a lot higher. And that, and that's ultimately the goal and get out to as many investors as we can. So I hope that answers that question. Operator? There are no further questions at this time, so, I'll hand it back to you for your concluding remarks. Yeah, thank you. So, as everyone has heard from us, we are a growth company. We've grown quite well in 2023. We're hopeful that that growth continues into 2024. And stay tuned for a lot of news to come. I think 2024 will have a lot more news than 2023. We have a lot underway. We have the plant expansion, we have the formation of a business plan for the Buckreef Main Zone, and we will then start to really turn the drill bit, and that will produce a lot of exploration results. As I said, I like to be flexible. The management team here likes to be flexible. What was presented today is the current business plan for 2024, but if a new one and a better one emerges, there will be a pivot. and so we will always wanna make sure that we keep shareholder value in mind and attempt to minimize dilution as much as possible. I thank everybody on today's call for being a shareholder and sticking with us. Thank you. This concludes the meeting. You may disconnect. Thank you for participating, and have a pleasant day.