Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the VersaBank 4th quarter and year-end fiscal 2021 financial results conference call. This morning, VersaBank issued a news release reporting its financial results for the 4th quarter and year- ended October 31, 2021. That news release, along with the bank's financial statements and supplementary financial information, are available on the bank's website in its investor relations section, as well as on SEDAR and EDGAR. Please note that in addition to the telephone dial-in, VersaBank is webcasting the conference call live over the Internet. The webcast is listen only. If you are listening to the webcast but wish to ask a question in the Q&A session following Mr. Taylor's presentation, please dial into the conference line, the details of which are included in this morning's news release and on the bank's website. For those participating in today's call by telephone, the accompanying slide presentation is available on the bank's website. Also, today's call will be archived for replay both by telephone and via the Internet, beginning approximately 1 hour following the completion of the call. Details on how to access the replays are available in this morning's news release. I would now like to remind our listeners that the statements about future events made on this call are forward-looking in nature and are based on certain assumptions and analyses made by VersaBank's management. Actual results could differ materially from our expectations due to the various material risks and uncertainties associated with VersaBank's businesses. Please refer to VersaBank's forward-looking statement advisory in today's presentation. I would now like to turn the conference call over to Mr. David Taylor, President and Chief Executive Officer of VersaBank. Please go ahead, Mr. Taylor. Thank you, Kelsey. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for today's call. I'm very pleased to be here for what is our 1st earnings call since our very successful U.S. IPO. Welcome to our new shareholders who are joining us today. With me for today's call is Shawn Clarke, our Chief Financial Officer. A record 4th quarter capped off what was a record year for VersaBank as our core digital banking operations continued to deliver strong growth in both loans and income. We achieved another loan portfolio record of just under CAD 2.1 billion and a record net income of CAD 5.9 million, up 25% year-over-year. A reminder to our U.S. shareholders and analysts that we report our financial results in Canadian dollars and all amounts in today's call will be in Canadian dollars unless otherwise stated. As proud as we are of our strong financial performance for both the quarter and the year, these were also periods in which we took a number of important steps that we believe will not only continue our growth trajectory but accelerate it. These include initiation and expansion of our closed ecosystem testing of our revolutionary digital deposit receipts or DDRs for short, a significantly new low-cost deposit opportunity as well as continued progress on execution of DRT Cyber's growth strategy. Perhaps most noteworthy during the quarter, we completed our initial public offering of common shares in the U.S. for gross proceeds of $63.3 million and concurrent listing on the Nasdaq. I couldn't be more pleased with the success of our offering and the overwhelming positive reception that VersaBank received from U.S.-based investors. I will note that our offering was well oversubscribed. I would like to take this opportunity to acknowledge the excellent work of the team at Raymond James U.S. as well as KBW and Stifel Canada for their hard work and support in making the offering a great success. Total loans at the end of the 4th quarter were up 27% year-over-year and 8% sequentially to a record CAD 2.1 billion, the result of strong growth in both point of sale loan and lease receivable portfolio and our commercial real estate portfolio. Total revenue for Q4 increased 33% year-over-year and 16% sequentially to a record CAD 18.2 million. Cost of funds decreased 20 basis points or 13% year-over-year and decreased 10 basis points or 7% sequentially to 1.31%. Net interest margin was down 9 basis points or 3% year-over-year, but up 12 basis points or 5% sequentially to 2.73%, with the year-over-year decline largely the result of our higher cash balances. Finally, net income increased 25% year-over-year and 9% sequentially to a record CAD 5.9 million. We are again this quarter especially proud to have achieved this performance amidst the temporary damping effect of our higher than normal cash balances, as I just noted, which were 11% of total assets at the end of the 4th quarter compared to a historical 6%-7%. This, I will note, is down from 13% at the end of Q3 this year as we put to work $63 million in capital raised by our US IPO common share offering. Notably, 2021 saw a return to strong growth and profitability following a flat year in 2020, when we held atypically high cash balances out of an abundance of caution as the pandemic arose and unfolded. Our 15% year-over-year increase in net income contributed to a compound annual growth rate in earnings of 22% since 2014, with growth in every year except 2020. Operationally, Q4 was very busy and productive quarter. As you've heard me discuss, VersaBank's access to ultra-low-cost deposits is core components of our model to generate superior net interest margins and profitability while taking less risk. The significant growth in our insolvency professional deposit business, an entirely unique offering based on our proprietary software over the past 6 years has contributed to a decrease in our cost of funds from 1.98% to 1.31% in the most recent quarter. Building on the solid foundation of momentum, our revolutionary highly encrypted Digital Deposit Receipt, or DDRs for short, is expected to provide an additional new opportunity for a step function growth in our low-cost deposits. We anticipate strong demand for these deposits as highly encrypted digital deposit receipt when placed on a public blockchain. We believe our receipts can be superior regulatory compliant alternative to the current stablecoins for mainstream financial applications. In August, we initiated closed ecosystem testing of our Canadian dollar-denominated DDRs or VCAD. Earlier this week, we announced expansion on testing to include US dollar-denominated DDRs or VUSD, as well as the Algorand and Ethereum blockchains in addition to the Stellar blockchain. We also added a re-receipt distributor who will become one of our primary distributors of our DDRs at our commercial launch. Concurrent with expanded testing, our DDR system is undergoing SOC 2 audit, which is intended to verify the non-financial reporting controls relating to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, privacy of the system. Testing will continue until completion of the SOC 2 audit as soon as possible, following which we plan to commercially launch VCAD and VUSD, which is currently targeted for early next year. As I noted earlier, we view our DDRs as a significant additional low-cost deposit generator, but clearly with rapidly developing regulatory environment for digital currencies, there are much broader business opportunities which we're actively and prudently exploring. Alongside the continuing strong performance in our core digital banking operations, our wholly owned subsidiary, DRT Cyber, continued to steadily execute on its growth strategy. A central part of its strategy is the introduction of new services that enhanced DRT's ability to provide comprehensive suite of cybersecurity solutions anchored by its leading penetration testing solution and to cross-sell and upsell these solutions, including through partnerships with other leading cybersecurity providers. During the fourth quarter, DRT entered into reciprocal reseller agreements with U.K.-based Syrenis, which provides personal information management and stakeholder engagement solutions for large global enterprises. Under these arrangements, DRT Cyber will sell Syrenis subscription-based flagship product, Cassie, a world leading consent and preference management solution for organizations globally. DRT Cyber will add Cassie to its suite of innovative solutions for data protection, cybersecurity compliance, and Syrenis will act as reseller of DRT Cyber anti-spam legislation solution, Raven, which integrates seamlessly with Syrenis' Cassie. 2021 was a good year for DRT overall, and we look forward to building on this success in 2022. I'd now like to turn the call over to Shawn to review our financial results in detail. Thanks very much, David. Good morning, everyone. In the interest of time, I'm going to confine my remarks primarily to selected 4th quarter results. Our full financial statements and MD&A for both 4th quarter and the year ended October 31, 2021 are available on our website under the Investors section, as well as on SEDAR and EDGAR. I will remind you that all the numbers reported here this morning are in Canadian dollars as per our financial statements, unless otherwise noted. With respect to our balance sheet, total assets at the end of the 4th quarter were CAD 2.4 billion, about 24% from CAD 1.9 billion a year ago and up modestly from CAD 2.3 billion sequentially. Our cash balance at the end of Q4 was CAD 272 million, down from CAD 297 million last quarter and up from CAD 258 million at the end of the 4th quarter of last year. As David noted earlier, the increase from Q4 of last year is primarily the result of the common share offering completed in the current quarter for net cash proceeds of CAD 73 million and the subordinated debt issue completed in April of this year for net cash proceeds of CAD 89.5 million, offset partially by the redemption of the Series 3 Preferred Shares also completed in April of this year. The decrease from the 3rd quarter of this year was a result of continued deployment of cash into lending assets over the course of the quarter. Our total loan portfolio at the end of the 4th quarter was up 27% year-over-year and up 8% sequentially to another record of CAD 2.1 billion, as David mentioned earlier. Looking at the composition of our balance sheet growth, our point-of-sale portfolio grew 12% sequentially and 30% year-over-year to CAD 1.28 billion, representing 61% of our total loan portfolio as of October 31st, up from 59% last quarter. Our commercial real estate portfolio grew 2% sequentially and 24% year-over-year to CAD 784 million, representing 37% of our total loan portfolio as of October 31st, down slightly from 39% last quarter. Finally, on the balance sheet, our book value per share increased 8.5% year-over-year and 3% sequentially to CAD 11.61. Shifting to our regulatory capital position. Our CET1 ratio at the end of Q4 was 15.18%, up from 13.88% last year and up from 11.94% last quarter. Our leverage ratio at the end of Q4 was 12.60%, up from 12.19% last year and up from 9.99% last quarter. The year-over-year increases in our regulatory capital levels and ratio as well as our leverage ratio are a function of a number of factors which included the issuance of the subordinated notes in late April, our common share offering completed in late September, and of course, retained earnings growth and tax provision recoveries related to the bank's deferred tax asset, all offset partially by the redemption of the bank's outstanding non-cumulative Series 3 preferred shares in late April. Our regulatory capital and leverage ratios at this time remain well above target. As David noted, the 4th quarter was not only a record quarter for VersaBank across a number of financial metrics, but also one that saw strong year-over-year and sequential growth across substantially all of our key performance indicators. Total revenue for the 4th quarter was up 33% year-over-year and up 16% sequentially to CAD 18.2 million as a function primarily of higher interest income, higher non-interest income, and lower cost of funds. Net interest margin for the quarter was 2.73%, down 9 basis points from 2.82% for the same period last year, but up 12 basis points from 2.61% for the 3rd quarter of 2021. The year-over-year decrease was a function primarily of lower yields earned on elevated cash balances, which was, as you know, an internal decision made out of an abundance of caution at the onset of the pandemic, as well as a function of lower yields earned on lending assets, offset partially by lower cost of funds. The sequential increase was due primarily to higher fees earned and lower cost of funds in the current quarter. Net interest income for the quarter was CAD 16.1 million, up 18% from CAD 13.7 million for the same period a year ago, and up 11% from CAD 14.5 million for the 3rd quarter of 2021. Both the sequential and year-over-year trends were a function primarily of higher interest income attributable to strong lending asset growth and lower cost of funds. Non-interest expenses for the quarter were CAD 10.4 million, up from CAD 7.8 million compared to the same period a year ago, and up from CAD 8.2 million compared to the third quarter of 2021. Both the year-over-year and sequential increases were the result of higher administrative costs attributable primarily to the U.S. IPO share offering and concurrent listing on the Nasdaq in September. The year-over-year trend also reflects higher salary and benefits expense attributable to an increase in staff complement and a general increase in staff related costs, as well as the consolidated results of Digital Boundary Group. As a result, our efficiency ratio for the 4th quarter jumped to 57%, well north of the low 50% range we enjoyed over the course of the year. That said, we view these additional costs as an investment in our future growth and fully expect our efficiency ratio to trend back to the low 50% range over the course of the first half of this coming year, and likely break into the high 40% range as our loan portfolio grows. Net income for the 4th quarter of 2021 was a record CAD 5.9 million, or CAD 0.24 per common share on both the basic and diluted basis, up 25% from CAD 4.7 million or CAD 0.20 per common share for the same period last year, and up 9% from CAD 5.4 million or CAD 0.25 per common share for the third quarter this year. With the sequential decrease in EPS, a function primarily of the increased administrative expenses I mentioned earlier, combined with the dilution resulting from the common share offering completed in September. More broadly, the year-over-year increase in net income was a function primarily of higher revenue, offset partially by lower recovery of credit losses and higher non-interest expenses. While the sequential quarter-over-quarter increase in net income was a function of higher revenue, combined with a higher recovery of credit losses, offset partially by higher non-interest expenses. As David noted earlier, Q4 once again saw a decrease in our cost of funds, which fell to 1.31%, down 20 basis points from 1.51% for the fourth quarter of last year and down 10 basis points from the 3rd quarter of this year. The decrease was primarily the result of the continued growth in our insolvency professional deposit base, which currently pays 0% interest despite lower bankruptcy activity in Canada. Looking ahead, we expect insolvency professional deposits to continue to grow over the course of fiscal 2022 through the continued onboarding of new trustee partners and organic growth from existing partners, combined with the potential for increased consumer bankruptcy and proposal restructuring volumes in the coming year as a number of COVID-19 related Canadian government support programs come to an end, as well as the prospect for potentially higher interest rates as a result of the Bank of Canada potentially tightening monetary policy. Credit quality of our loan portfolio remains very strong, and as at the end of the quarter, we had no impaired loans or loans in arrears on our balance sheet, which continues to be the case today. For Q4, we reported a recovery of credit losses in the amount of CAD 279 thousand, compared to a recovery of credit losses in the amount of CAD 582 thousand for the same period a year ago, and a provision for credit losses in the amount of CAD 96 thousand for the 3rd quarter of this year. The sequential trend was a function primarily of changes in the asset mix comprising our commercial real estate portfolio, as well as broadly more favorable macroeconomic forecast data used as forward-looking information in the bank's credit risk models, offset partially by higher loan balances. Our PCL ratio or provision for credit losses as a percentage of average loans for the 4th quarter were negative 0.05%, up from negative 0.14% for the same period last year. Our PCL ratio for the year ended October 31, 2021 was negative 0.02%, unchanged from 2020. Finally, our average PCL ratio for the past 12 quarters was negative 0.01%. Amidst the continuing evolution of the pandemic, though, we continue to operate at a heightened level of awareness to ensure that our origination and underwriting practices remain highly disciplined and focused. I'd now like to turn the call back to David for some closing remarks. David? Thank you, Shawn. The success of VersaBank is nearly 30 years in the making. In 1993, we became the first fully digital branchless financial institution using proprietary technology to provide unique, high value add solutions that addressed unmet needs in the commercial deposit taking and lending. Despite our long track record of success, I truly believe we are just getting started. The time is right to fully capitalize on our opportunities as a digital bank. We have significant macro wind at our backs as financial world increasingly becomes comfortable with and recognizes the benefits of digital banking. Within our bank itself, we look forward to 2022 with great deal of confidence and enthusiasm. Building on the best year ever, 2021, we are well positioned to accelerate our growth. We expect continued growth in total loans as we continue to deploy capital to opportunities in our existing portfolio. Each of our point of sale commercial and commercial real estate portfolios have long runways of future growth ahead. We also expect to generate growth from new opportunities, most notably the opportunity to bring point of sale financing model to the U.S. market that we believe based on our research, is similar to Canada a decade ago, and there are limited options available for consumer-facing finance companies in the USA. Accordingly, we see tremendous potential in what is estimated to be a $1.8 trillion market that is growing at 20% annually. There is no denying that this sectoral trend at the consumer-facing end of the market, which has created a significant opportunity for our unique offering based on our proprietary technology access to ample low cost funding to provide an attractive alternative source of inexpensive, flexible financing to these businesses. The US launch of our point of sale model is a top priority for 2022, and I look forward to keeping you abreast of our progress going forward. With that said, I'd like to open up the call to questions. Kelsey? Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, we'll now begin the question-and-answer session. Should you have a question, please press the star followed by the 1 on your Touch-tone phone. You will then hear a 3-tone prompt acknowledging your request, and your questions will be polled in the order that they are received. Should you wish to decline from the polling process, please press star followed by the 2. If you are using a speakerphone, please lift the handset before pressing any keys. One moment please for your 1st question. Your 1st question does come from William Wallace from Raymond James. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my call, my question. David, maybe just following up on the last point that you ended with about expanding point of sale into the U.S. What needs to occur for that to happen? Well, Wally, we are plowing presently through some legal work in order to close our 1st sort of milestone deal in the United States. It's really just a matter of getting the lawyers to sort out the legal documentation. There aren't any really other impediments other than that. Based on wherever you feel like you are in the process, do you feel like this is likely to be a 1st half event for 2022? Yes. Yes, indeed. Hopefully we'll have a number of new U.S. relationships in the first half. As time progresses, you know, we're dreaming of huge growth in the States. It may be advisable for us to obtain a U.S. bank as a subsidiary sometime in the future. Presently, we're able to lend from funding in Canada. Okay, great. On the Canada business, obviously the October quarter was exceptionally strong in point of sale. You know, with 1 month into this quarter, do you feel like that rate of growth is continuing, or do you feel like there was just some lumpiness in the October quarter that drove such a strong growth rate? Yeah, not lumpy at all. It's just gathering momentum in Canada. The pandemic caused a bit of concern among our point of sale finance partners with the treatment they received from some of our competitors. We bent over backwards. Our team bent over backwards to ensure that our point of sale partners were comfortable and could survive it. Now we're sort of reaping the benefits of that, where we're seeing a lot of enthusiasm for our product throughout Canada. That's what's driving this extraordinary growth in the point of sale business. There's some consolidation in the Canadian market that's helping out too. Shawn, in the release, when you were talking about the sequential growth in net interest margin, I believe you cited that there was elevated loan fees in the net interest income. Can you quantify on a dollar basis or on a basis point impact to NIM? Sorry, what elevated which? I didn't catch that. Loan fees. It sounded like, I believe I read. We talked about some loan fees. Those are some loan fees from the CRE portfolio that were bumped up a little bit this quarter, somewhat anomalous. All, as you know by looking at our numbers, they're fairly consistent quarter-over-quarter. This was a bump just due to some transactions that were coming to fruition. I wouldn't expect to see that kind of a lift going forward, but maintaining consistency in our past quarters. Okay. Kind of back down to where we were in the prior quarters where you would point us on net interest margin. Correct. Okay. Sorry. Our net interest margin in general, though. I thought you were talking about the fees. Net interest margin, I think we'll see that start to continue to expand over the course of the coming half. As David mentioned a number of times, we would expect to see that climbing back toward norms and into approaching 300 basis points. That's as we grow into the subordinated debt funding and continue to see reap the benefit of our the organic growth of our trustee and bankruptcy program. We expect over the course of the year to see it back up towards where we were much earlier in this year prior to the subordinated debt offering. Okay. Okay, thank you. Then in the non-interest expense, are the administrative costs associated with the September capital raise recurring or non-recurring? If they're non-recurring, can you tell us how much comes back out? Yeah. I think many of them will be recurring. Well, as you know, you're talking about things like insurance, capital tax, audit fees, all items, of course, that were not capitalized as part of the offering. We see potentially maybe CAD 500,000 to CAD 600,000 may not be recurring on a go-forward basis. As we noted in our remarks on the call that we view this as an investment in our balance sheet going forward. This is a little bit of a new normal for us, but we think we'll grow into it very quickly. We do fully anticipate the spike in efficiency ratio to come down quickly over the course of the first half of the year back into the low fifties range, and we're hoping to press into the high forties range in the back half of 2022. Okay. All right. Very good. That's helpful. My last question is just on the DDR offerings. Would you anticipate continuing to expand the blockchains that those offerings would be available on? Is there, you know, any way to help us think about, you know, how that launch looks when you do launch commercially? Well, as I said, David here, the blockchains we're presently on is probably where we'll be for the time being. What it will look like is we'll launch in Canada, strictly in Canada to start with, but both with U.S. denominated coins and Canadian denominated coins, just to Canadian residents to start with. In the future, however, with likely with an acquisition of a U.S. bank subsidiary, we'd expect to bring the U.S. dollar-denominated digital deposit receipts, the VUSD, to United States audience. Okay. All right. Thank you very much. I'll let somebody else ask a question. I appreciate it. Thank you, Wally. Thank you. Your next question comes from Greg MacDonald from LodeRock Research. Please go ahead. Thanks. Good morning, David, and congrats on the quarter in the U.S. listing. Good morning, Greg. Good morning. Wanted to ask a question on the dividend. With OSFI lifting the restrictions, we've seen a couple of Canadian banks lift dividends. And given the earnings payout and current dividend that you have, certainly there's upside room, particularly as the US deposits, sorry, US capital gets deployed. But at the same time, I can appreciate you're embarking on a number of growth initiatives. Can you just talk about the bank's current dividend policy and what the bank's board and management's view is on dividends going forward? Just trying to get a sense of growth opportunity. That's a good question, Greg. With all the growth opportunities in front of us, presently we're thinking, unlike the other banks, it seems, not increasing our dividend, keeping it where it is, in that the retention of the capital fuels the growth and we see a lot of growth ahead of us, particularly in the United States. Going forward, though, and looking a bit into the future as things sort of stabilize, I could see the dividend increasing, again, to not the sort of level the other banks are at because we expect we'll always be growing, but at least higher than it is today. Okay. We've seen in the past sort of 10%, 6%-10% earnings payouts. Should we be thinking as earnings grow, you're going to try and stick to that type of level just in terms of a quantum? Or is there opportunity to actually increase payouts relative to what you've had historically. Well, for the short run, I would look at the 10% payout. Thereafter, we definitely could go higher. There's lots of room. Yeah. We are looking at tremendous growth opportunity. That's what's sort of modifying our view on dividend payouts presently. The extent to how fast we can grow in the U.S. market will weigh on us. You know, as I was saying earlier, $1.8 trillion market with. We're bringing a somewhat disruptive new way of funding these point of sale finance companies that was extremely well received in Canada. I don't think we actually did any real marketing in that area in Canada. It was sort of word of mouth, and it caught on almost like a grass fire. This year, of course, it's growing very rapidly. You know, we think we can deploy our capital probably more effectively for our shareholders by fueling growth rather than paying it out. Okay. That makes sense. The growth numbers are certainly there. It's a nice bridge to my second question. A little more context on the point of sale growth. That was the surprise for at least me in the quarter. You mentioned both home improvement and home financing in the press release. Can you give a little more context on what the growth in the quarter was? Particularly, I'm keen to know, was home financing a bigger part of what you saw in the quarter? It was. The home improvement and home financing has been gathering momentum over the last few quarters. As Canadians, I guess, are looking to improve their home offices, their backyards, all the places they've been confined to for quite some time. There's been somewhat of an exodus from the major centers to the more economical outlying areas. That's all driven our point of sale program and also our real estate construction business has benefited from that trend also. Okay. That's good to know. You indicated you saw sustainability of that going into 2022. That's helpful. Last question I'll ask, David, and then I'll pass it on to others. The TIB deposits that you referenced continue to grow quite handsomely. I don't think we've seen as many consumer bankruptcies as what we thought we would. You still indicate that there's an expectation for that, but I know you still have room also for growth within your existing partner base there. Can you give us some context? Do you anticipate the growth in 2022 to be similar to that in 2021? Is there any reason we should think that that wouldn't be the case? No reason to think it wouldn't be the case. We expect the bankruptcy level in Canada to increase. We're presently at a 35-year low. With the support payments coming to an end for the most part and with the prospect of interest rates increasing, I think bankruptcies will get to sort of normal levels. That in combination with us still onboarding new insolvency firms should give rise to more accelerated growth for the TIB business in 2022. Okay. That's good to note. Thanks very much, David. Thank you, Greg. Your next question comes from Brad Neff from Coral Capital. Please go ahead. Hello, gentlemen. Good morning. First question is just a clarification from Wally's question regarding net interest income. Was there elevated fee or, you know, one-time fees in there related to maybe loan prepayments? Brad, to just expand a little bit on that. We routinely have prepayment penalties flowing in each quarter. It might have been a slight increase in this quarter, a few basis points, but nothing significant. Okay. Thanks. Regarding fee-based income, it looked like it was CAD 2.1 million versus, say, CAD 1.2 million in the previous quarter. What was that jump related to? That would be fees related solely to Digital Boundary Group, the subsidiary of DRTC. They had a bit of a slowdown due to pandemic issues. It sort of rebounded towards the end of the year. That was all in all Digital Boundary Group as a sub at DRTC we thought did very well. It looks like that sort of momentum it was developing in the second half of the year will continue on. This is a better run rate to think about going forward. We're hoping that Digital Boundary Group in itself will grow at, say, 20%-30% in the upcoming year. Then there's all the cross-selling of the individual cybersecurity products that we talked about to cross-sell to the existing customer base. We're, you know, hoping for significant growth in the DRTC sub. Okay, great. Thanks. Regarding VCAD and the kind of U.S. digital currency, it sounds like the plan is to launch at the same time, the Canadian and the U.S. Is that correct? That's right. Strictly in Canada for the time being, in that's our test market. As you know, we have VCAD and VUSD available on our wallets, actually on my phone and Shawn's phone, so we can transact business on Algorand presently. We're waiting sort of patiently to not so patiently I think to have these SOC 2 audit completed, which we're expecting next couple of weeks. With that completed, a commercial launch early in 2022 is quite likely. Okay. With that launch just in Canada, I mean, I'm just trying to think about that relative to other stablecoins, you know, USDC for one. You know, they're not. Yep. Not bound by, you know, borders. How long is that tough to do to bound a stablecoin by borders? Two, how long do you think it will be bound, and when you can just open it up to, you know, borderless? It depends on the regulation in the United States. That's what we're keeping our eye on, and I'm sure USDC is keeping their eye on it too considering what the press has been talking about and concern. We're keeping. From our perspective, it's not a technological issue. It's making sure that our coins comply with U.S. regulation. Thinking ahead, it may very well be that we need a U.S. subsidiary of VersaBank in order to provide a regulatory sort of platform for our USD and even VCAD. Could you envision a scenario where, you know, say, if you don't have this clear guidance regarding U.S. regulation, you know, you could actually still have your stable coin, you know, anywhere in the world, but non-U.S. I mean, there's still a big market, Europe, you know, Asia, et cetera, that you could capitalize on while you're waiting for this, you know, regulatory guidance to clarify. Yeah, that's certainly technically possible. We're as technically able to have our stablecoins throughout the world, just as all the rest are. It's just we're, you know, as a Schedule I federal bank, we play close attention to the regulations. Our view is that we're unique in the world, in that we're a bank issuing a Digital Deposit Receipt, whereas the rest are not banks. We believe the Bank Act gives us sort of unfettered power to do what we're doing. We just wanna make sure that that's the same understanding that the U.S. regulator would have. It appears they would, as a bank. That's what a bank does. It issues deposits. Having the most highly encrypted deposits, I think, is a good thing for a bank as opposed to the others that are participating in this space that are not banks. That's where I think that's what's causing the regulators some concern, that an industry has grown so large without the normal regulatory scrutiny, oversight that we banks have had since the beginning of banking. Right. You know, when you kind of think of the dynamic between, you know, waiting for this U.S. regulation, which you know could take years, even though they say they wanna do it quicker, versus, you know, just launching it in the United States, allowing the stablecoin, you know, for, you know, U.S. residents, and just seeing what the consequences are thereafter. Which it seems like that's normally, you know, like certainly in the sense of DeFi, what the industry has done. You know, they're just moving full forward and, you know, we'll see what the regulation says afterwards. When you- Yeah. Think of those two scenarios, how do you think about that? Well, I think we banks will never do something like that. We're maybe a lot more cautious than the unregulated entities that are operating in that space. However, it appears to us that we're well within our rights to issue digital deposit receipts in the United States as a federal bank. However, we don't have a federal bank subsidiary in the States yet. So I think that's the first step. Other than that, our read of the Bank Acts in Canada and in the States is that we are well within our rights to issue digital deposit receipts. We don't see the other guys being well within their rights. I think that's where the concern is coming from. You know, I think they. I mean, the pressure is for them to get on side. Well, from our point of view, we are on side, but we don't have a U.S. sub. I think the step for us is to have a U.S. sub. In Canada, we're already, you know, able to do it. That's what I'm saying basically, is that I don't see any impediments to a bank issuing what we're issuing, but to operate in various jurisdictions, I think it's important to have a subsidiary in that jurisdiction where the regulators can take a hard look at it and understand it and regulate it as they should. You know, we banks take hard-earned people's money and hopefully look after it very well for them. That's why, you know, we have regulators, so we're able to do that. Okay. Gotcha. Last question in your time on that same thing. As I think about this stablecoin, you know, you'll never have a charter in, you know, Asia, probably. Should I think of this as never, you know, being borderless like other stablecoins, so it's more of a, you know, geographic stablecoin? I think it depends on the jurisdiction itself. Some jurisdictions are not as particular, say, as the U.S. and Canada and U.K. and some European countries. Others are more accepting that the bank is regulated by a prime regulator, and they'll accept it. Others, I think, would like to see the subsidiary. The ones I mentioned probably would. I mean, our coin could be throughout the world, just as the others are. It comes with, I think, a comfort that it has been issued by a highly regulated real bank, and it carries an investment grade with it too, an A rating, which is universal investment grade. You know, we as a bank, we're a little more careful, I think, than those that got into the space, without needing to worry about regulation, at least at the early stage. I think they do now. Brad, I hope that Great. Thank you. Someone else can ask some questions here. I appreciate it. Okay, Brad. It's good talking to you. Thank you. Your next question comes from Charles Griege from Blue Lion. Please go ahead. Good morning, guys. How are you? We're good, Charles. We're here in the frozen north. Other than that, we're okay. The questions that Brad asked were, and the answer is very helpful. Just had a follow-up question on the expenses, just to get a better understanding of kind of how to think about run rate expenses. If we could maybe just dig in a little bit, your insurance expenses increased meaningfully. What exactly drove that, and what should we be thinking about as a sustainable level? Charles, insurance expense, obviously, with the bank entering the U.S. market through an IPO and a concurrent listing. D&O insurance obviously took a little bit of a jump for us. Probably the biggest component there, that's something that will be ongoing. We'll of course be doing everything we can to mitigate those amounts going forward. At this point, that was probably the D&O, is the biggest lift in that portfolio. Is this the rough increase on a quarterly basis, or is this more? To give you some idea from a modeling perspective. Is that a permanent expense? That's a prorated amount, obviously, Charles, for the Okay. Last, like, 6 weeks or so of the quarter. It's about a tenfold increase year-over-year on an annual basis. All right. When you go to professional fees and consulting services, those also increased pretty markedly. How should we think about that line item? As you know, Charles, obviously with the entering U.S. market, the audits are very comprehensive, and we'll be exposed to those as we go forward. Those amounts, again, the list that you would see, depending on how you're modeling, would be consistent, say, on a go-forward basis, but haircutted of course for the quarterly. The annual amounts of course are a little bit higher with the comprehensive nature of the actual annual audit. These are expenses that we will continue to incur going forward. That, that's a good run rate. Well, I guess we've got it prorated for a full quarter. Correct, sir. I guess more of the one-time related expenses are in the other line item? Yeah. One-time in the order of CAD 500,000. About CAD 500,000? That's right, sir. That's exactly right, Charles. About CAD 500,000. Okay. All right. Thank you very much. I'll just jump back in queue. You're welcome. Thank you. Thank you. There are no further questions at this time. You may please proceed. Well, I'd like to thank everyone for joining us today, and I look forward to speaking to you at the time of our Q1 results. Thank you, everybody. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes your conference call for today. We thank you very much for participating and ask that you please disconnect your lines.