Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Basilea Pharmaceutica acquisition of fosmanogepix conference call and live webcast. I am Sandra, the call's call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to David Veitch, Chief Executive Officer. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you very much. Hello, I'm David Veitch, CEO of Basilea, and I'd like to welcome you to our conference call and webcast to discuss the acquisition of the broad-spectrum antifungal, fosmanogepix, from Amplyx Pharmaceuticals, an affiliate of Pfizer, which we have reported this morning as an ad hoc announcement. The ad hoc release is available on our website at basilea.com. I would also like to mention that this call contains forward-looking statements. Joining me on our call today are Dr. Marc Engelhardt, our Chief Medical Officer, and Adesh Kaul, our Chief Financial Officer. Basilea is a leading company in the field of anti-infective treatments, specifically the treatment of severe bacterial and fungal infections. This is demonstrated by our two marketed brands, Cresemba and Zevtera. Within the last few weeks, we have entered into three transactions of anti-infective assets and significantly strengthened our clinical pipeline. Today, we announce the acquisition of the rights to the fosmanogepix, a phase III ready broad-spectrum antifungal. We are very excited to have acquired the rights to fosmanogepix because it holds a lot of promise in the fight against invasive fungal infections. It has the potential to become our next lead commercial product and midterm value driver. Fosmanogepix is a potential first-in-class antifungal drug. It has a novel mechanism of action that Marc will explain in more detail in a moment. As it has already successfully completed a number of phase II studies in both yeast and mold infections, we believe that we will be able to quickly move the compound into phase III development and are planning to start the first of the phase III studies in yeast infections as early as mid-2024. Pfizer is already a licensed partner for our current lead product, Cresemba, and similar to our long-standing licensing partner, Astellas, for the US, they are doing a great job commercializing Cresemba in most parts of Europe, as well as China and Asia Pacific. Pfizer also maintains the right of first negotiation for the commercialization of fosmanogepix. Fosmanogepix has a broad spectrum of activity, including strong activity against Candida auris, a pathogen that has made its way to the media this year, as the U.S. CDC warned that infections caused by Candida auris have been increasing at an alarming rate. Fosmanogepix provides activity against all fungi that the WHO has included in their list of critical priority pathogens that must be addressed, as the mortality rates of yeast and mold infections remain high. We have previously indicated that one of our key goals for 2023 was to complement our clinical pipeline. With its novel mechanism of action, the fact that it is a phase III-ready asset and addresses areas where patients have the highest unmet medical needs, the potential for gaining benefits through orphan drug pathways, and its overall innovative and differentiated profile, just to name a few features, we believe that fosmanogepix fits perfectly with our in-licensing priorities. Through our three recent transactions, we have significantly strengthened our clinical pipeline and have positioned ourselves as a preferred partner for late preclinical to phase II assets, and we are looking forward to further attractive opportunities for future transactions. I'll now hand over to Marc. Thank you, David. Fosmanogepix is the prodrug of the active compound, manogepix, and is rapidly cleared by systemic phosphatases, which are ubiquitous in humans. Manogepix has a unique mechanism of action by inhibiting the cell wall protein Gwt1, which impedes the production of cell wall monoproteins that are essential for the cell wall function of fungi. This inhibition causes cell wall fragility, fungal cell death, decreased potential for biofilm formation. Manogepix has potent antifungal activity and provides broad-spectrum coverage against yeast, molds, and its excellent activity against Fusarium species, fosmanogepix has recently been recommended as a treatment option by the U.S. CDC in the context of an outbreak of Fusarium meningitis in the U.S. Finally, fosmanogepix has a favorable drug-drug interaction profile and may be synergistic with amphotericin B and echinocandins, which enables additional options in difficult to treat patients. The efficacy of fosmanogepix has been demonstrated in numerous in vivo fungal infection models, including disseminated models of central nervous system infection, fungal models with various Candida species, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Fusarium solani, and pulmonary infection fungal models with Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus flavus, Coccidioides immitis, Lomentospora prolificans, Rhizopus species, and Scedosporium apiospermum. In addition to improved survival, reduction of fungal burden in lung, kidneys, spleen, eye, and brain was shown in several animal models. Fosmanogepix is ready for clinical phase III, and we plan to initiate the first phase III study in invasive candidiasis around mid-2024, followed by an invasive mold phase III study toward the end of 2024. The experience from clinical trial pertains to more than 300 patients treated for up to six weeks with Fosmanogepix in seven phase I studies, one phase II-B study, and three phase II studies in indications of candidemia, Candida Auris candidemia, and invasive mold infections. The double-blind phase III non-inferiority study in candidemia invasive candidiasis will include approximately 450 patients randomized to initial intravenous therapy with Fosmanogepix or Caspofungin. An oral step-down option is for fosmanogepix in the Fosmanogepix group and fluconazole in the Caspofungin group. Primary endpoint for the FDA is 30-day survival, and for the EMA is overall response at the end of study treatment. Initial health authority approval has been obtained for this protocol, and we expect study initiation at mid-2024. The phase III study in invasive mold infection is an open-label, randomized study comparing fosmanogepix with the respective best available therapy or standards of care in various mold and rare mold infections. We anticipate the study being initiated at the end of 2024. I will now hand over to Adesh. Thank you, Marc. Let me explain the key financial terms of the asset purchase agreement. Fosmanogepix was initially developed by Eisai, who licensed the asset to Amplyx, which was subsequently acquired by Pfizer in 2021. Hence, we not only acquired the intellectual property data, regulatory files generated by Amplyx and Pfizer respectively, but we also signed the license agreement with Eisai. Under the terms of the agreement, we make an upfront payment of $37 million. If we are able to successfully develop the product and commercialize it, Pfizer will be eligible for future commercial milestone payments of up to $110 million, based on global net sales of the product. Pfizer has the right of first negotiation for commercializing fosmanogepix, which it can exercise by making an offer for commercialization rights once phase III results are published. As I mentioned before, we are also assuming all rights as well as obligations from previous agreements. This comprises a total of up to $396 million of potential milestone payments, mostly regulatory and commercial, as well as tiered single-digit royalty payments. With respect to mid-term guidance, we expect to make a total of mid-single-digit $ million payments in the coming years. We believe that our investment is well warranted in the light of the great business opportunity Fosmanogepix provides for us as a potential key revenue driver beyond Cresemba. With its extended spectrum covering both yeast and molds, Fosmanogepix opens up a significant opportunity in the entire market of antifungals for the treatment of invasive fungal infections. Its differentiated profile and the exceptionally long commercial lifespan of at least 10 to 12 years in key markets, based on the extended exclusivity granted to orphan drugs and the FDA designation of fosmanogepix as a qualified infectious disease product, provides the potential for significant long-term value creation. The upfront payment of $37 million is reflected in our P&L statement and is not capitalized. We are therefore updating our full-year guidance accordingly. The transaction is reflected in operating expenses, which are expected to increase from previously guided CHF 80 million to approximately CHF 115 million. Our continued strong revenues enable us to absorb fully the impact of all our transactions this year. We continue to expect positive operating and net profit for full year 2023. The operating result is expected to amount to between CHF 11 million and CHF 15 million, versus previously CHF 50 million to CHF 55 million, and the net result is expected at between CHF 2 million and CHF 6 million, versus previously CHF 41 million to CHF 46 million. One additional explanation on the development of total revenue. While the transaction has no impact on revenue per se, we are reducing our guidance on total revenue by CHF 3 million. The reason for this is that the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, FDA, has waived the application fee for our new drug application for our antibiotic, ceftobiprole, in the United States as part of a program to support small businesses. As you may recall, the phase II development of ceftobiprole is largely funded by the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, BARDA. But they would have paid the application fee and shown it as R&D costs in operating expenses, while the subsequent refund by BARDA would have been shown in other revenue. Due to the waiver, the BARDA reimbursements, as well as operating expenses, will be reduced by the amount of the application fee. Although it is too early to provide detailed financial guidance for 2024, we are comfortable to state that we also expect positive operating and net results in 2024 from today's perspective. I will now turn over to David. Thank you, Adesh. With the three recent transactions, we have significantly strengthened our clinical pipeline beyond Cresemba and Zevtera, which was one of our key corporate goals for this year. Let me highlight a few important milestones for the coming months. For our antibiotic, ceftobiprole, we're looking forward to an FDA decision on our NDA. The PDUFA target date for this is April 3, 2024. The U.S. is the most important market for branded hospital-based anti-MRSA drugs. Therefore, an approval in the U.S., together with the 10-year market exclusivity in the U.S., is very important for this brand. Prior to the FDA decision, we are planning to execute a partnership with a commercialization partner for ceftobiprole in the U.S. In the first half year, 2024, we're also expecting a decision by the EMA, granting a two-year pediatric extension for our antifungal Cresemba in Europe, which would extend the commercial life until October 2027. For fosmanogepix, we're expecting to initiate the two phase III studies in 2024. The first one in candidemia invasive candidiasis in mid-2024, and the second one in mold infections around year-end. In addition to that, we'll continue to increase the Cresemba and Zevtera revenues, which are providing us with the financial strength to keep on making the right investments for expanding and progressing our R&D portfolio, to create long-term value in areas that offer significant opportunities for sustainable long-term growth. Thank you for your attention, and we're happy to now open the line for any questions you might have. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the touch-tone telephones. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use only hands that are asking a question. Only three questions might be asked in the row, then the line will be open for others. You can get back in the queue again for any follow-up questions. Anyone with a question, may press star and one at this time. Our first question comes from, Brian White, from Calvine Partners. Please go ahead. Yes, good afternoon, and congratulations on securing such transformative assets. A couple of questions, just in terms of the agreement itself, thinking about your relationship with Pfizer just now, and I just wondered how important the experience of Qsymia had been in terms of securing this asset from Pfizer. And then secondly, looking at the start date of the phase III studies, just wondering what else has to be done. Has all the CMC work been completed in terms of the phase III start? And then just finally, I know it's very early, but if you had any guidance on how long the phase III program may take. Thank you. Okay. So thank you, Brian, for your questions. I'll kick off, first of all, in terms of the... Yeah, I think the relationship we have with Pfizer, which, as I said, I think earlier, is a successful one with Qsymia, that I guess I can only imagine that was a positive factor, but it's clear for us that this was a competitive process. So Pfizer looked at a number of companies, including ourselves, and so it was a competitive process that actually led to a final decision that they would move forward with us. But yes, I think the relationship, which is, I think, a good, successful one, must have been a factor, but not the only factor. I mean, Adesh, would. Your team were involved heavily in this, so would you add anything to that? No, I think that's absolutely right. So I think if the relationship would not be good, probably it wouldn't have helped the transaction. Yeah. Okay. Then your question about the phase III, you know, what needs to happen now to get the phase III study up and running mid-2024, maybe. Marc, at a high level, you could just mention the, you know, the key steps. Yeah. So one of the steps is that we are engaging in transition with Pfizer. This will result in the transfer of the sponsorship, and then we will run the study as sponsors. The studies need to be operationally set up, so we will be engaging, with the help of, Raul, to do this, and we've already have thought about this, so this will be a relatively fast approach, and we're quite confident that by mid-2024, we will be able to start these studies. I think you've also asked about the duration. I think we are expecting this type of study could be done within time from around three to four years. Okay, that's great. Thanks. So, just Brian, to presumably the reason you asked the question, because the three to four years, then obviously we're expecting, we believe Cresemba will continue to grow in revenues through to the end of 2027, and then in 2028, we believe the product will probably start to decline as the U.S. and European exclusivity, you know, stops. So actually, you know, I think this therefore fits nicely, we believe, with that sort of timeframe about, you know, in addition to hopefully the Zevtera revenues will be growing nicely at this time. And then in addition, we will have, you know, around this time, the launch of fosmanogepix, if everything goes well in terms of the studies and the regulatory approval. Okay, that's great. Thanks. That makes perfect sense. Thank you. The next question comes from Li Chen from Pareto Securities. Please go ahead. Hi, good afternoon, and yeah, congrats with the deal. So yeah, two questions. So for the first one, how do you think about the potential market size since candida species do not seem to be a major type of fungal infection that is as as Aspergillus, for example? Do you expect it will have the same market potential as Cresemba? And my second question is, so regarding the two phase three trials, how much do you think you need to run the trials? Thank you. Okay. Maybe thanks for the questions. What I would say is, Adesh, do you want to, as you alluded to this in your words earlier, do you want to talk about the market potential in terms of this product in relation to Candida and Aspergillus? Yeah. So I think what you can see actually when you go back to the presentation, that's all the slides that we had. In essence, both areas offer significant market opportunities. So the way that we define the market, actually the market is almost split 50/50 when it comes to value between the Candida market and the market for treating mold infections. So overall, we believe that both markets offer significant market opportunities, and that with the profile of fosmanogepix, actually in both markets, during both potential indications, we would actually be sufficiently differentiated to have a meaningful impact. So overall, we believe that fosmanogepix can be a very, very meaningful product in this overall market. Then the question around the phase III cost of the studies. I mean, I'll give a first stab at that, and then Marc or Adesh, you can jump in. I mean, I think, you know, it's sort of public knowledge because of the BARDA funding and the cost of our Ceftobiprole phase III program, which with the with the FDA, and that was a two-study like this would be for fosmanogepix. So we're sort of we were looking at around the sort of $140 million cost, of which for ceftobiprole, you know, 70% was paid for by BARDA. I mean, what we would say is we, we've done the business case for fosmanogepix, assuming no non-dilutive funding. But obviously, now we've got the asset in our hands, one of the first things we would do, and we believe it addresses many of the priority pathogen areas that actually would interest, you know, an organization such as BARDA. So we would approach them clearly, as a priority to try and also see if they would fund the product and the program. I think, though, but that gives you an indication that, you know, if there was no funding from any sort of third party, then ballpark, we've got the cost of the ceftobiprole program, which was about CHF 140 million. But maybe, Marc or Adesh, you want to add something to that? No, I think that's exactly right. So maybe just to then bear in mind that the total cost, of course, will be spread over the study periods. So it's not sort of that that will be caught within a specific given year. Okay, perfect. Thanks for taking the question. As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one. The next question comes from Soo Romanoff, from Edison Group. Please go ahead. Hi, congratulations. It's nice to see that you're, you know, kind of focused on growth now. We had the call kind of broke up a little bit, so I might have missed some of this, so apologies if I'm kind of repeating anything you might have covered. Can you give us an idea of what the events or details on how the milestone payments will be triggered? So maybe, Adesh, you want to take that question? Yeah, sure. And it is actually a little bit convoluted or complex. So in essence, you can think about it, payments under the existing agreement that we just announced, or the new agreement, that's payments to Amplyx or actually Pfizer. There's the upfront payment of $37 million, which we will be recognizing already this year in full, and which is now reflected in our guidance, and the $100 million up to $110 million in commercial milestones, which is just a typical setup, where you have, depending on certain sales levels, different milestones are being triggered. So that's sort of that portion. When it comes to the previous agreements, the total milestone payments there are $396 million. What we have indicated is really that the majority of those are related to regulatory and commercial events, and especially the commercial milestones are, again, very similar. When you reach certain commercial thresholds or sales thresholds, they are being triggered. As a near-term guidance, what we have indicated is that over the coming years, overall, we're expecting to have CHF mid-single-digit million milestone payments under those agreements. In addition, even though you didn't ask for it specifically, there are also payments due on sales with respect to royalties. So there are tiered royalties, and that's also very, very typical. Again, depending on the sales level, you have different tiers at different royalty rates, and overall, they range from single digits to single digits, so to say. Yeah. No, that's really, that's really helpful. Thank you. My second question is really your focus seems to make sense, right? Is there any insight you can give me based on the studies that have been done to date that give you a competitive edge over the standard of care? Yes. So maybe not. Yeah, I mean, there's the versus standard of care and maybe also looking at other compounds in development that, at maybe a similar stage. But maybe, Marc, you want to take, take that question? Yeah. So I think from a medical perspective, this is really a fascinating asset. I mean, the spectrum is very broad. It's highly fungicidal against yeasts, including Candida Auris. It has a different mechanism of action, so it will work in fungi that are resistant to current treatments. It's IV and oral, which is really important, and I think also differentiates against, for example, Rezafungin or Olorofim, that currently have only oral formulations. So for these patients that are severely immunosuppressed, often have chemotherapy-related mucositis or, you know, gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease, it's really important to have an agent that can be given oral, when patients can, you know, take oral medication, but also IV when they cannot take oral medication. So I think it's really a combination of broad-spectrum, cidal activity against, also resistant Candida, really activity in rare mold infections, for example, Fusarium, differentiated, also Scedosporium, Lomentospora. And then finally, it also seems that the CYP3A4 mediated drug interactions will not be a major issue with this compound. So there's, this is a spectrum that will be very useful in, in difficult-to-treat patients with, invasive fungal infections. Okay. Thank you so much. Congratulations. Thank you.