Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Swiss Life Q1 2026 Trading Update conference call and live webcast. I am Sandra, the conference call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants have been placed on listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a Q&A session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star one on your telephone. Webcast viewers may submit their questions or comments in writing by the relative field. Kindly note that webcast questions will be answered after the call. For operator assistance, please press star 0. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it is my pleasure to hand over to Matthias Aellig, Group CEO of Swiss Life. Please go ahead, sir. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for dialing in and for your interest in Swiss Life. Today, we are reporting on selected top-line figures for the first quarter of 2026. I will start with an overview, and our Group CFO, Marco Gerussi, will give you more details. We had a good start to the year with pleasing top-line growth in the first quarter of 2026. Both the fee and the insurance businesses contributed to this growth. Swiss Life increased its fee and commission income by 6% in local currency to CHF 686 million, with all businesses contributing. Gross written premiums, fees, and deposits received increased by 5% in local currency to CHF 8.2 billion. Swiss Life Asset Managers reported strong net new assets of CHF 4.2 billion in third-party asset management, compared to CHF 9.3 billion in the exceptionally strong prior year period. The SST ratio was estimated to be around 210% at the end of March 2026. I'm particularly satisfied with the growth in our fee income across all divisions and businesses, meaning asset managers, owned IFAs, and owned and third-party products and services. We are well on track with our Swiss Life 2027 program. In addition to our first quarter disclosure, we are announcing today the acquisition of Telis Group at Swiss Life Germany. With around 1,800 advisors and a fee income of more than EUR 200 million, Telis is one of the leading German IFAs. With the acquisition, Swiss Life Germany will further strengthen its position as a leading financial advisory company. Combined, we will have in Germany around 8,000 certified advisors and a total fee income in excess of EUR 1 billion. This was a unique opportunity that we have seized from the founding family, who will stay with us in an advisory role. I'm pleased that with this transaction, we accelerate our profitable growth in the German IFA market. I would like to welcome Telis within the Swiss Life Group and look forward to their contribution to Swiss Life Germany. On that, I hand over to Marco. Thank you, Matthias, and good morning. I'm pleased to walk you through our trading update looking at our good first quarter 2026. As usual, all figures are unaudited. Figures for the group are reported in CHF and for each business division in local currency. Growth rates are stated in local currency. Let me start with our business division, Switzerland. Premiums increased by a strong 10% to CHF 5 billion. Life insurance market remained flat. Premiums in group life grew by 10% to CHF 4.5 billion, while the market decreased slightly. Single premiums increased by 25%, driven by higher premiums from existing clients and new business. Periodic premiums declined by 3%. Assets under management in our semi-autonomous foundations were at CHF 8.1 billion, compared to CHF 8.4 billion at year-end 2025. The decline is due to negative market performance and the net transfer into our full insurance business. Premiums in individual life grew by 7%. The overall market was up by 5%. Single premiums grew by 20%, driven by the unit-linked business. Periodic premiums declined by 1%. Fee and commission income was up by 2% to CHF 93 million, mainly due to higher income from unit-linked and investment solutions for private clients. Turning to our French, German, and international business divisions, which all report in euros. Let me start with France. Premiums were down by 2% to EUR 2 billion. The total market was up by 11%. In our Life business, premiums were down by 1%, driven by lower premiums in the savings and pension business. The overall market grew by 14%. The unit-linked share in our life premiums increased to 73%, compared to the market average of 41%, reflecting our unchanged focus on unit-linked solutions. We generated life net inflows of EUR 0.6 billion. Total market net inflows were at CHF 19.3 billion. In health and protection, we kept our focus on profitability before growth. This resulted in a 7% decline in premiums. Market growth was at 7%. P&C premiums grew by 4%. Fee and commission income rose by 8% to CHF 166 million, due to higher unit-linked fee income based on higher average unit-linked reserves and net inflows. The income contribution from structured products remained stable at the pleasing level. I continue with Germany. Premiums were up by 3% to CHF 425 million, driven by modern and disability products, as well as a higher single premium. The market decreased by 6%, mainly in single premiums. Fee and commission income rose by 5% to CHF 238 million, supported by both a higher productivity and a higher number of financial a dvisors at owned IFAs. Compared t o the first quarter in 2025, the number of financial advisors grew by 3% to 6,154. These numbers do not reflect the acquisition of Telis Group, which we announced today. With this transaction, we will further s trengthen our position as a leading financial advisor in Germany and further grow our advisory base and the fee result. Closing of the transaction is expected in the third quarter 2026. Turning now to international. Premiums decreased by 3% to CHF 1.1 billion. Higher premiums with corporate clients were more than offset by lower premiums with private clients. Fee and commission income increased by 2% to CHF 94 million, driven by higher income from owned IFAs. In February 2026, we announced the partnership between Swiss Life Network and Generali concerning a small part of our employee benefits b usiness. The fee income reported today excludes this business. Let's move on to Asset Managers, which reports in Swiss franc. For your information, we have expanded our disclosure for Q1 and Q3 in line with our full and half-year reportings. We now disclose total income, which consists of the commission income and the other net income, including the real estate project development. Asset Managers' total income rose by 12% to CHF 261 million. In our PAM business, total income increased by 4% to CHF 90 million. The increase is mainly driven by higher real estate transaction income. In our TPAM business, total income grew by 16% to CHF 171 million. The increase in recurring income is due to higher assets, while the higher non-recurring income is largely real estate transaction income. The share of total non-recurring income for TPAM, meaning commission income and other net income from real estate project development, was at 13% compared to 6% in the prior year. As mentioned at our full year results disclosure, for each 2026 and 2027, we expect to achieve a share of around 25%, which is in line with our Swiss Life 2027 targets. Net new assets in our TPAM business amounted to CHF 4.2 billion, compared to CHF 9.3 billion in the first quarter of 2025, which was exceptionally strong. We saw continued strong inflows in our index business, and inflows in real assets amounted to CHF 0.8 billion. Both these inflows were slightly offset by outflows, in particular from money market funds. Assets under management in our TPAM business increased to CHF 148 billion compared to CHF 146 billion at year-end 2025. Net inflows were partly offset by negative performance. Turning to our investment result. Direct investment income decreased by CHF 142 million to CHF 0.9 billion due to lower income from equities and infrastructure, which included the sale of infrastructure assets in the prior year. Additionally, we had various movements in the foreign exchange rates, particularly related to the U.S. dollar. The non-annualized direct investment yield was at 0.7% compared to 0.8% in the prior year period. Looking at the net investment income, we had a stable development compared to the first quarter in 2025. Real estate continues to be an attractive and important asset class for backing our long-dated liabilities. Vacancy rates decreased to 2.9% compared to 3.1% at year-end 2025. Real estate fair value changes, which is non-annualized, were positive at around 0.3%. For the full year 2026, we expect a similar trend as in 2025, with further positive real estate fair value changes driven by our Swiss real estate portfolio. Moving to solvency, cash, and payout. At the end of the first quarter of 2026, the SST ratio was estimated to be around 210% and therefore marginally below year-end 2025. This is due to market movements which more than offset the positive impact from a hybrid issuance in January 2026. As of today, we estimate our SST ratio to be at the same level as at year-end 2025, well above the ambition range of 140%-190%. At the end of the first quarter, liquidity at holding amounted to around CHF 0.6 billion. Our ongoing share buyback of CHF 750 million is well on track and will run until the end of May 2026. As of 15th of May 2026, we repurchased shares worth CHF 726 million. Let me sum up. We are pleased with the performance of Swiss Life in the first quarter of 2026. We grew both our fee and our insurance business. The net new assets in our Third-Party Asset Management business increased, and our SST ratio is at a strong level. With this, we are well on track to achieve all of our group financial targets of our Swiss Life 2027 program. With this, I hand back to you, Matthias. Thank you, Marco. We will now open the Q&A session. Who would like to start? We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered a queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Questions on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode and eventually turn off the volume of the webcast while asking a question. Webcast viewers may submit their questions or comments in writing via the relative field. Kindly note that webcast question will be answered after the call. Our first question comes from Michael Huttner from Berenberg. Please go ahead. Fantastic. Thank you. Well done for really good results. I had two questions. One is on Telis and one is on the non-recurring. Can you give us a feel for what Telis will do? I know you say raise your fees, but on a kind of run rate basis, how much would it add to profit? On Telis, I don't know how to ask it, but I'm really trying to find out how much it costs, but maybe you can kind of give us a feel for what it would do to solvency when the deal closes. On the non-recurring, so up from 6%- 13%, is this actually now cash deals or is it still kind of accrual based? Also, I know you said 25% is still on track, but if you're six, if you're so far ahead of what you did last year, and last year was 25% at full year, is there a little bit of upside to come? Thank you. Thank you, Michael. Let me start on the Telis acquisition. As you said, we gave the indication for the year 2025 in terms of fee income. There, we said it's more than CHF 200 million. In terms of fee result contribution, so on a pre-tax and pre-financing cost basis, for the year 2025, you can, as an indication, take something between EUR 25 million and EUR 30 million. Keep in mind that Marco just said we expect the closing somewhere in the third quarter. If that materializes as we assume, the first year where we have a full run rate year will be 2027. In terms of the costs, we have agreed with the founding family, the seller, not to disclose the purchase price. In terms of SST, you can assume it has no relevant impact whatsoever. In the end, it's a fee business. It's not an insurance business, obviously. I think that's in respect of Telis. Let me go on with the question on the non-recurring income, what we report for Q1, the 13% non-recurring income, meaning the commission income and the other net income from real estate project development that is fully cash. In terms of the full year, by construction, this non-recurring income exhibits really variations quarter- by- quarter. I wouldn't read anything in the fact that we have now 13% and the 6% in the prior year. We clearly said we expect for the full year 2026 is around 25% that Marco said. Brilliant. Thank you very much. You're welcome. The next question comes from Thomas Bateman from Mediobanca. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. Could you just come back to Telis? Could you just talk us through a little bit more about your strategy in Germany, but also how Telis would fit into your platform? I don't know, I'm thinking here more along cost savings potentially from Telis moving their drivers onto your platform. Is that something that we should think about in the long- term? The second question is just on investment income. Clearly, there was a little bit of a drop this year. Could you give us a bit of a feel for the outlook for investment income for the full year? Thank you. I will start with the question on Telis, and Marco can give you then some color on the direct investment income. On Telis, our strategy in Germany, I think that was very clear from the investors' day. We want to further grow our IFA business in the German market. We were starting in the program with a strong position. We had as a result, also quite significant ambitions in terms of fee result. We mentioned that we are working in the current program also a bit more on the back-end systems, and that as a result, let's say the fee result target of more than CHF 150 is a bit back-end loaded within the program. This is fully true what we said. We now have just had the opportunity to accelerate that strategy. As we always say, all the targets we have are organic. When there is this opportunity to go for something that fits strategically, financially, and culturally, we do that as a bolt-on transaction. That's what you have seen here. It's really an acceleration of our strategy in the German market. With that, we further strengthen our leading position in Germany. On the second question that you had in terms of potential synergies, what is important is that we clearly will retain the brands of Telis. As we have done it with the other brands that we have in Swiss Life in Germany, we'll retain that brand of Telis. Clearly, over time, there will be synergies in the back office. There is a platform we are sure Swiss Life in Germany can also learn from Telis, and there we are clearly positive that Telis will contribute positively to the fee result starting on day one in Germany. With that, I hand over to Marco for the investment income. Thank you. Relating the investment income. As I said during the presentation, the decrease we have seen, this is to some part refers to a sale in the infrastructure area, where parts of the proceeds were distributed as a direct investment income in the prior year period. This is somewhat now missing in the numbers in the first quarter 2026. There is another effect, I would say that's more technically related, staff restoring or relating more to timing. That's something we will see later on. There is a smaller part relating to U.S. dollar FX movements on the direct investment income. The yield on the direct investment income, I would say this is something we expect to be at a similar level than in the prior year, than in 2025. As I said, also additionally in the presentation on the net investment income yield, we had a stable development compared to the prior year first quarter period in 2025. The net investment income finally is one of the important for our results. Thank you. Could I just one follow-up on the liquidity at holding number that you gave, the CHF 0.6 billion. Is that inclusive of the acquisition of Telis? As we said, we are closing the deal in the third quarter. Of course. Yeah. Sorry. That's all. Yeah. Who goes next? The next question comes from David Barma from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Thanks for taking my questions. Just to confirm on Telis, Matthias, thanks for the details. You are saying you don't expect any material impact on either holding cash or remittances from Germany. Is that correct? Secondly, on the solvency ratio, could you please give some details on the movements in the quarter, and particularly on the market effects? Linked to that, the interest rate differential widened in Q1 and continued to widen in Q2. If you could talk a little bit about the potential impacts on SST and the CSM, please. Lastly on France, the fee income growth continues to be really good. If you could give some color on new business growth there. Thank you. I hand over to Marco for the SST and the French question. I will end with the Telis question. On the solvency, at the end of the first quarter, the marginally decrease to around 210 comparing to the 213 at year-end 2025. This is mainly due to market movement in equities and credit spreads. That's something that recovered then year-to-date as of today. That's why we are saying we are at the similar level than at the year-end. The differential was just a marginal one of the very, let's say, the many smaller items moving a bit up and then a bit down, but that has not a, let's say, a measurable impact on the numbers. Overall, same speaking about the economical part of the CSM, I'd say that the same holds true also for the CSM development. The question on the French business on the fee income. Quite a pleasing growth that continues there. You're absolutely right. This is mainly due to the unit-linked fee income, and that's based on two factors. It's net inflows, new business fee right there, but also some positive market effects on the underlying assets for the reserves, the unit-linked reserves. I think I said that also during the presentation. One part of it continues to be the structured products we sell and offer in the French business together with our bank that is at a very pleasing, stable, but very pleasing level and also contributing to the overall higher numbers. Maybe coming to a question on Telis, David. What are the impacts of that acquisition? I talked about the acceleration of the strategy in Germany and what we clearly expect from this acquisition, that we will see a higher fee result. I've just mentioned the CHF 25 million-CHF 30 million that deal is has achieved in 2025. Again, that's a pre-tax and pre-financing cost number, but that's what we clearly expect as a number going forward. This is an asset that, as I said, is fully functional. We expect such contributions starting day one, as said, for 2026, not on a full year basis. With the fee results there are corresponding remittances. Your question in terms of cash at holding was probably more geared towards the financing of that acquisition. You may have seen that we have issued a senior bond, CHF 500 million senior bond, for general purposes in April, and a large part of that will be used towards the financing of that acquisition. Per se, and I think that's the point, there's no impact on the cash it's holding due to the acquisition, per se. Over time, I said, there will be these higher remittances. Thank you. You're welcome. The next question comes from Nasib Ahmed from UBS. Please go ahead. Hi, morning. Thanks for taking my question. Think for me, firstly on Telis, can you just kind of help me understand the margin on that business relative to your own German IFA business? It seems like it's a little bit lower than what you're targeting in Swiss Life 2027. Second question on the holding company cash development. You've issued some senior debt already. What's the holding company cash position today? Is that going to be used for the buyback at 1H? Finally on political changes in Switzerland. You've got the population control vote, Lex Koller, renter control in Zurich. Have you done some sensitivities on what that would mean for your business if those things go against you on the real estate market? Thanks. I think I hand over to Marco for the whole call cash, because at the end, it's a Q1 call and not a Telis call, but I will take then Telis and the political things after that. The cash as holding as of today is CHF 1 billion. I think it's important to consider a senior bond we issued in April, the EUR 500 million that Matthias just mentioned, which is for business purpose. That's money for Telis, so a large part, as Matthias said, but also the remainder put at work in our operating company. Overall no impact on the cash level at holding. I think second point to make, which is also very important, we don't use bond transactions or issuance for share buyback financing. That's completely to be separated. Maybe on political developments, you mentioned a couple of them, and maybe let's start with this initiative on federation level in June around the sustainability, as it's called, on immigration. Look, this is first and foremost a political decision. That's why we do not comment too heavily. I think there what is important for us that irrespective of the outcome of that popular vote, that policymakers in Switzerland continue to make sure Switzerland is and remains an attractive place for doing business in the interest, let's say, of the prosperity of the country. To be frank, I think Switzerland has a very good track record on that. In that respect, we are not particularly concerned about that vote. Now, on the Lex Koller, there is this recent proposal by the Federal Council. This is at the very early stage of the process. This is a proposal where now everybody can give input. Clearly we think this is a very bad idea going forward. There are very good arguments against it. It doesn't solve any problem. It's not feasible. I will spare you the details of it. What is key, I think, is every now and then, and if I look back the last 10 years, probably every other year, every three years, there are proposals that either are coming from the Federal Council, but mostly from the parliament. They are discussed. We take them seriously, don't get me wrong, but there are very good arguments against them, and then after a while, they just disappear, as said, because they do not solve any underlying problem. In terms of the initiative in the state of Zurich, also something we take obviously very seriously, similar to what I just said on federal level, the initiative doesn't solve any problem. It just would lead to a situation where existing real estate kinds of becomes even more valuable because there will be less investment activity. Again, same thing, we have, I believe, very good arguments against it. We are pretty confident that this will not materialize. Last question was on Telis. I think if you were asking about the margins. As said, it's a very similar business. It's a very similar business mix. The numbers that I've given to you make the case that it's broadly in line. Again, we have taken it for strategic reasons to make this acquisition and not for any, let's say, margin differences or anything like that. Hope this gives some clarity on it. Yes. Thank you. That's very helpful. I was just wondering on the political stuff, that's helpful in terms of where your thinking is. Can you give some exposures on your business? Some sort of kind of sensitivities on the thing? I think there is policy on the sharing, on the rental income, et cetera, but anything that you can give around what the impact could be for Swiss Life? Look, this is pure speculation at this point in time. What I think is important that you can take with you is the statement I've made about the federal initiative mid-June. In Switzerland, there is a clear sense that we have the interest of maintaining Switzerland as an attractive business hub, anyway, there will be pragmatic implementations of it anyway. To that, let's say level, I wouldn't, let's say, expect for us as a company, very material impacts. Perfect. Thank you. The next question comes from Iain Pearce from BNP Paribas. Please go ahead. Hi. Morning. Thank you for taking my questions. The first one was just on the Switzerland top line growth. Obviously very strong in Q1, particularly on the group life business. Could you just talk a little bit about what's the drivers of that really strong growth, and particularly, are you seeing any benefits of sort of disruption you might be seeing at Pearce? Second one was just on France. Sort of the disconnect between the top line and the fee income. It sounds like unit link's growing quite strongly. Could you just talk a little bit about what's going on in the other businesses in France, particularly what you've seen on the top line in Q1? If I could just get a third one in as well on the investment result. The sort of growth versus net investment result and saying the net investment result is sort of stable year on year, but the growth investment result will improve. Does that mean you expect the net investment result to improve year on year? Is that what we should be reading into that, or are you sort of guiding flat on the net investment result year on year? Thank you. Thank you, Iain. I leave the question on Switzerland and the investment income to Marco, and I will try to answer the French aspect. Okay. On Switzerland, the group life business top line you referred to, there is, as you said, and noticed quite a very pleasing growth in those premiums. Driver behind it is single premiums. This has two sources. One is existing clients we have that, let's say, put additional money of their businesses into those products. The second driver behind it is new business we got into our books. I would not make a direct link to any other developments in the market. I would say that's in that, we know it from prior years in the normal course of our business. That growth, I would say. On the investment income, I think I elaborated on that in detail on the direct investment income on the reasons for that. This is some of the underlying assets being sold, that ethics topic, and also some timing related things. On a yield basis, we expect the year-end number 2026 on the level of 2025. The net investment income, I haven't said anything into the future about that. We don't guide in detail. One thing I said is the real estate fair value changes. We had 0.3% non-annualized positive real estate fair value gains, and also expect that's what we said during the presentation, a similar trend like in 2025, also in 2026, meaning further increasing fair values mainly driven from the Swiss real estate portfolio. I think that gives you a bit of a flavor what we expect during the remainder of the year. Hope that helps. Then let me come to the French top-line development may be across the business line. I think what is important, we said it on earlier calls, Marco mentioned it today. Not only in France, but also in France, we follow profitability before growth. That's the underlying principle we have been following for years. What does it mean concretely? In the Life business, we were able, with our focus on the capital-light unit-linked business to grow that business. We have been growing the unit-linked business, the share of unit-linked business. That's what Marco has shown. The share in terms of unit-linked in terms of premiums has grown significantly. We are way above the market anyway, but we have de-emphasized this part which comes with the guarantees. That's the so-called Fonds Euro, and there the market has been behaving differently. Again, we put profitability first, and I think that explains a bit the development in the Life business. Really focus on the capital-light unit being solutions. In health and protection, similar picture, we are protecting the profitability. We have been talking about the turnaround that we achieved in 2024, maintained in 2025. We keep focusing on profitability in that business as well. That's why we incurred, as a result also of significant price increases, a reduction of the top line by 7%. That's very clearly below the market. We stop contracts. It's really profit first. P&C, which is not a very big business, but there, we increased by 4%. I hope that sheds some light on, let's say, the line of business view in France. Yeah, that's great. Thank you very much. You're welcome. As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star followed by one. The next question comes from Jonathan Progin from Finanz und Wirtschaft. Please go ahead. Hi, thank you for taking my question. Probably last question on Telis. Was this deal necessary to reach your fee result target for CHF 1 billion in 2027? Is it just additional growth you're expecting from it? Also, you said that last time that your real estate project development fees are back-end loading, so still like 2027 kind of coming in. Can you give us an update on that? Do you still think this is back-end loaded, do you see some fees coming forward, coming earlier than expected? Also maybe what's your take on interest rate movements in the euro area? We ar e seeing a lot of inflationary pressures. Do you expect any impact from that? Maybe lastly, looking into the future, what's your next strategic initiatives? You've got a wealth manager in Switzerland. Will this wealth manager play a more important, bigger role in your group business going forward? Or do you plan to broaden your private markets offering in your asset management? Also you've got a non-life insurer in France. Do you expect this, or can you maybe say if you want to expand this offering into other markets? Yeah. Okay, thanks. That was quite a wealth of question. I will take the last one. Marco will say a couple of words on the real estate project development. I will finish off with Telis again. Let me start with your first question. We are absolutely focused on executing the current program, Swiss Life 2027. We have lots of initiatives going on here. In terms of the example you have mentioned, Swiss Life Wealth Managers in Switzerland, we clearly have said, in December 2024, Roman Stein, our CEO of Switzerland, has said he wants to establish that business as a third core business. He, as I said, the entire executive board is working on implementing the strategy of the current program. I think we mentioned every time that we are well on track with the implementation of that strategy and that we are also well on the way to achieve the financial goals of the program. When there is an outlook to be made towards the next strategic period, I have to refer you to the investor's day. The next one, as said, we're currently focusing on the program at hand. Marco will say a couple of words on the project development. On the project development, I think it's important that overall, we may use the term back-end loaded overall for the CHF 1 billion or the above CHF 1 billion target 2027 overall for the group in the fee result and also in asset management where the project development business is allocated. Obviously, there is higher numbers. Why is it higher numbers? During the different years, we have the total income growing. I think that's something we aim for. The share of the non-recurring part, including the project development business, that's something we expect to be around 25 this year, so in 2026 as well, next year in 2027, again, around 25% of that share. The share of the project development business is equally distributed over the current and the next year. Because the total income is higher, the absolute number obviously also becomes higher and contributes more to the at le ast CHF 1 billion we are aim for in 2027. I think that's the way how I can explain it. Overall, the business itself is not back-end loaded. It is dynamic during the year, over different years, but we aim for the 25% also this year. Let me close that with the Telis. As I mentioned in my first answer, we are well on the way to achieve also our financial goal. That gives us the answer. No, we do not need the Palus acquisition to reach our fee result target. Having said that, our strategy is organic, if we see an opportunity that fits in terms of strategy, financials, and also culture, then we are open to acquire a business. Here we really had a very good opportunity, and that's why we clearly have seized it. There was also one question if I listen carefully to it in regards to the interest rate environment, right? As always, we monitor those developments. For us, important because of our resilient business model. We have shown also in the past that we can navigate ourselves through different rate environments given the life insurance arm of our business as well as the real estate arm, kind of a natural hedge. We see and therefore we are in the base case environment, how we think about things, while obviously always monitoring it and being ready to react if necessary. Great. Thank you very much. You're welcome. The next question comes from Matteo Lindauer from Vontobel. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning, everyone. Thank you for taking my questions. A quick one on your European real estate portfolio. Could you give us some more color on the revaluation effects for the European properties? Also, how did your vacancy rate develop outside the Swiss portfolio? The second topic is on your net new assets. Could you give us a split of the inflows to the respective asset classes? Where were the strongest inflows you have seen in the first quarter? Thank you very much. I think I hand over to Marco for both. I think it was even three questions. On the real estate, we reported the fair value change as a positive change as a 0.3% non-annualized, driven by the Swiss portfolio. Outside of Switzerland, I would elaborate on that or describe it as rather a flattish development with some movements or the positive fair value changes that were clearly driven by the Swiss portfolio. Vacancy rates overall, they decreased, positively decreased from 3.1 to 2.9. This is almost given also the underlying portfolio, mainly driven by the Swiss system movements. We had some positive effects also in the French portfolio. We don't disclose that in more details. Overall, as you have seen, the number decreased. In the net new assets, also not disclosing all the details. Important for us, we have real assets. That's CHF 0.8 billion. CHF 0.7 of it is real estate inflows, CHF 0.1 billion infrastructure. We have quite a large share of index business, so that's securities. As I mentioned during the call, some outflows, mainly related to money market funds. I think that gives you a good view on the flows, which are overall index-driven, but quite a share of real assets in it. Perfect. Thank you very much. The next question comes from Michele Ballatore on KBW. Please go ahead. Yes. Thank you very much for taking my question. My question is around more generally on M&A. I think, obviously, this is more a bolt-on kind of acquisition. In general, in terms of the approach to M&A, what are you usually looking for in a target? Specifically, for example, in Germany, what is the competition that you face when you identify, let's say, a potential target? Thank you. Thank you, Michele. In terms of M&A, I think it's very clear. We have a bolt-on strategy, and bolt-on means we do opportunistic deals because our targets are organic. Bolt-on also means we do not go up too much in size. If we look in terms of focus, it is clearly in our fee businesses where we have perspectively and also retrospectively put our focus our meaning in the IFA businesses, in the Asset Management area. That's where we have been focus our M&A activity. What is key, and I think I've mentioned that also before, for us, it's the strategic fit that is absolutely crucial. It has to accelerate our strategy. We need, obviously, the financials to be in line with our expectation. Most important or equally importantly, I would say, is the cultural fit. Specifically in the areas of the fee businesses, there are people behind the success of those businesses, and retaining these people on board is absolutely crucial. I think coming now to the example in Germany, that's what we could offer. We could offer to the founding family an environment where we could clearly demonstrate we would retain a well-established Telis brand. They knew it's not just that we would claim it. We have a track record of that within our Swiss Life Germany IFA roof, if you wish. We have four different brands. Now we will have a fifth one that we have developed that have given individual financial advisors the opportunity to grow, to develop. I think that's something we have had as, I would say, a unique offering to the founding family, who, as I said, will stay with us on board. I hope that gives some indication, M&A approach, how we think about it, and specifically also what this meant for the German transaction. Thanks. You're welcome. The next question comes from Henry Heathfield from Morningstar. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thank you very much for taking my questions. A few quick clarifications and one question on Switzerland and international, please. On Telis, could you confirm that the purchase is 100% outright, or is there a stake left for the founding family? The CHF 200 million fee income, when do you expect that to fully come into your accounts? Lastly, I was wondering if you'd give us an update on the number of financial advisors you have in the Swiss and the international business, please. I think Marco will do the financial advisors, because as I said, it's a Q1 thing. I will then say a couple of words on Telis. On the financial advisors in Switzerland, the number is around 500, and in international, it's on a rounded basis, 1.7. The number in Germany, I think I've mentioned during the call, 6,140, 45. On the Telis transaction, we purchased 100%. Upfront, we go for the full stake. I mentioned that the family remains involved on board, they are there in an advisory role, but we have the full ownership of the company. That said, they will remain on board, so to say, in an advisory position. The CHF 200 million fee income, as said, we expect that for the full year 2027 to be the first time on a full year basis included in the accounts. As said, closing of the deal is expected in the third quarter of 2026, so in 2026 we will see a share of that CHF 200 million. Was that CHF 1,500 in Switzerland? Not CHF 500, around. Not CHF 1,000, around CHF 500. CHF 500. Okay. Thank you very much. We have a follow-up question from Michael Huttner from Berenberg. Please go ahead. Fantastic. Thank you. Most of my questions have been answered. You've been doing such a great job. I had two. One is, I know you said it's a Q1 thing, but I just wondered if you can give us a feel for the trend or whatever of net new assets. The other one is, so many years ago, I think it was the 2021 Investor Day or 2020, I can't remember. I asked what the success of Swiss Life is linked to, because you've got all these countries and brands and stuff. The answer then is, basically, you make the local CEOs come to Switzerland, and effectively, without you doing anything, I think they spend the night or the day cooped up together, and then they start competing. Is that still how you do it? It's almost like voluntary competition between all these units, or what drives it? Thank you. Thank you, Michael. First of all, the notion of us doing nothing is maybe not the right one. You're absolutely right, is we have this entrepreneurial spirit among the business divisions. They stand also in front of the investors, the analysts at investors. They know they have to deliver, they want to deliver, and I think that's one of the drivers of our success. At the same time, we also give them to really live their entrepreneurial spirit and their team's entrepreneurial spirit room to really pursue their ambitions. In terms of the NNAs, we all know this NNA figure, this may vary quarter- by- quarter. We have seen that in the past years. What I can say is that we target CHF 170 billion in TPAM by the end of 2027, and we had a really very good start into the year with the CHF 4.2 billion. We're on track to reach those CHF 170 billion by the end of 2027. We do not need to achieve CHF 4 billion a quarter to reach that. We're confident that we reach to CHF 170 billion. Hope that gives some idea. Thank you. you. Thank you very much. Our last question is a follow-up from Thomas Bateman from Mediobanca. Please go ahead. Hi. Thanks for coming back. I always listen to your confidence on the fee result target, but maybe investors are a little bit more skeptical. With this deal, should I assume the new target is closer to CHF 1 billion and CHF 30 million? There should be an incremental step up from this. Just a second question is on your thoughts on share buybacks in the future. Obviously, the current share buyback has almost ended. You've now chosen to do a deal, which I like, although the lack of disclosure on the consideration is a little bit difficult. How should I think about share buybacks over the next 12 months given you've done this deal? Thank you. For the question, maybe on the first one, we said the fee result will be larger than CHF 1 billion for FY 2027. There's nothing to add. As I said, we mentioned FY 2025 that we are well on track to reach also that target. We continue with that, and that is now, let's say, additional guidance to be given. You may recall that as a matter of principle, we don't adjust targets anyway, so it's still larger than CHF 1 billion, unchanged, if you wish. In terms of how we think about share buybacks versus also in light of the deal we just have taken, the framework is well-known, I think, given the time. I will not walk you through the details of the framework. I said, well-known. What I may say is what I just, I think, answered in a question to Michael Huttner. We have recently issued this senior bond for general purposes, and large parts of that will be used to finance the acquisition. Net-net, there will be no impact on the cash that's holding vis-a-vis the level that Marco has mentioned per end of Q1. I hope that gives you some color on how we think. That's helpful. Thank you. Good. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you very much for your questions and for joining us today. Before we close the call, let me recap. In the first three months of 2026, we continued o n our growth path and increased the top line in both the fee and fee insurance businesses. We're making good progress, and we are well on track with our Swiss Life 2027 program. Thank you again, and I wish you a nice day. Goodbye. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now over. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for participating in the conference. You may now disconnect your lines. Goodbye.