Hello, and welcome to Banco de Chile's, Banco Santander-Chile's second quarter 2023 results conference call. We are joined today by the CFO, Emiliano Muratore, Chief Strategic Planning and Head of IR, Cristian Vicuña, and Chief Economist, Claudio Soto. I'll now hand the line over to Emiliano to begin the presentation. Please go ahead, sir. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to Banco Santander-Chile's second quarter 2023 results webcast and conference call. This is Emiliano Muratore, CFO, and I'm joined today by Cristian Vicuña, Chief of Strategic Planning and Investor Relations, and Claudio Soto, Chief Economist. Thank you for attending today's conference call. Today, we will be discussing the trends and results of the second quarter. I am pleased to share that our digital strategy and customer-centric product offerings have been instrumental in driving robust results across all business segments, particularly witnessing exceptional growth in non-NII revenues. In addition to this success, our relentless focus on cost discipline has allowed us to partially offset the NII pressures arising from the non-clients NIM during this period of lower inflation and high rates. Looking ahead, we are optimistic about the benefits our well-positioned balance sheet will reap from the Central Bank of Chile easing cycle of interest rates, which commenced last week. This shift is anticipated to trigger a significant recovery in our NIMs, and we expect this positive impact to manifest in the final months of this year. To begin, I invite Claudio Soto, Chief Economist, to give us an update on the macro scenario beginning on slide 5. Thank you, Emiliano. During the second quarter, economic activity contracted significantly due to continued tight financial conditions and less favorable external conditions for the country. Also, a poor mining performance, affected by the delay of large investment projects, had an impact on activity. In the coming months, we will continue to see a weak economy, with consumption falling at significant rates and low investment. Based on the information available, we have revised downward our activity estimate for this year from -0.75% to -1%. However, next year, the economy should rebound and grow at around 2%. The contraction of GDP has generated a significant slack in the economy. This, together with an appreciated peso, the normalization of raw material prices, and a reduction in international logistics costs, have caused inflation to drop rapidly. Thus, the CPI, after closing 2022 with an annual variation of 12.8%, today stands at 7.6%. In this context, the Central Bank of Chile began the process of monetary easing, with a sharp cut of 100 basis points in the monetary policy rate at its July meeting. The rate drop was somehow higher than expected by the market. Because of that, there were adjustments in some financial prices. The peso tended to depreciate, and swap rates fell significantly, indicating that the next rate cuts would be more intense than the expected until a few weeks ago. In recent days, the peso has continued to depreciate due to global factors associated with greater risk aversion after the downgrade of the UF sovereign note. Looking ahead, we estimate that despite the recent depreciation of the peso, inflation will continue to drop rapidly and will close 2023 at around 4%, to then reach the target of 3% during the second quarter of 2024. This will give room for the Central Bank to continue cutting the Monetary Policy Rate 100 basis points in each of the following meetings during the year, with which the MPR will close at around 7.25%. In the second part of 2024, the rate will reach its neutral level, which we estimate at 4.25%. On page six, we give an update on proposed regulations. At the political level, after the rejection of the tax reform in Congress last March, the government has announced a Fiscal Pact. The idea is to implement measures against tax evasion and to boost growth with the aim of increasing fiscal revenues, and thus financing a series of expenses in the areas of health, pension, and public security. Next March, there will be a new bill with a proper tax, tax reform, although details are still unknown. On the other hand, the government has summoned various actors to unlock the pension reform, which has failed to advance in Congress. In financial matters, the Central Bank of Chile decided to activate the countercyclical, Countercyclical Capital Buffer, setting it at 0.5% of risk-weighted assets. This as a precautionary measure against financial risk from the external scenario. Banks have until May 2024 to constitute that requirement. Thank you, Claudio. I would like to start by reminding you of our Chile First strategy on page eight, where we are aiming to become the best bank for our customers, employees, communities, and shareholders. We want to achieve this plan through the four pillars of our strategy. First, to become a digital bank with branches. A digital bank with Work Cafés, to reach customers with state-of-the-art technology and the best level of service. Second, we've specialized in value-added services for our corporate, middle market, and private banking businesses that focus on value-added transactional, trade, FX, and advisory products and services. Third, searching for growth opportunities. We want to break paradigms in the banking sector, finding new business opportunities, and leading the sustainable transformation of our clients. Finally, a key enabler, an organization that is agile, collaborative, and high-performing, in which a diverse culture with exceptional people can advance based on merit. To elaborate on our first key pillar of a digital bank with Work Café, we highlight the success of our digital products, such as the Santander Life Accounts, which have over one million clients with access to a simple current account and the opportunity to buy other products, such as time deposits, mutual funds, and access credit lines and loans when they meet the bank's risk requirements. We also offer our Más Lucas, our new sight and savings account, that was launched in March this year and is gaining traction every day. The onboarding process is 100% digital. There are no passports, only facial recognition. This account has no fixed or variable costs and accepts deposits for up to CLP five million. Thanks to these successful initiatives, we have around two million digital clients who are able to carry out their banking needs through the website or phone app. The advances in our digital strategy have allowed us to deepen our branch innovations. Many of you have had the opportunity to experience our Work Café branches, our digital branches, with a co-working space, and we have reinforced our branch network with the Work Café Espresso branches, a format that aims to consolidate cash operations in a transaction hub with a Work Café look and feel, and a state-of-the-art technology behind the scenes to offer our customers an efficient and more secure experience. We have opened four Work Café Espresso centers in Viña, Rancagua, Santiago Center, and Las Condes, and we are looking for further expanding the model in other dense areas in Chile. On page 10, we can see the results in the advancement on our digitalization and simplification in the reduction of our branch footprint. As of June, our total network reached 260 branches, down 16% from June 2022. 31% of our branches currently are cashless, meaning that there is no back office, and that the branch is a business center oriented towards advisory, new business, and customer experience. At the same time, our productivity is rising, with loan and deposit volumes per branch increasing 22% year-over-year, and in the same indicator per employee, rising 6.8% in the same period. Moving on to page 11, we can see how our SME footprint is growing, is growing strongly with the joint offer with Getnet. Firstly, our digital life accounts for SMEs continue to drive a 17% year-over-year increase in total clients of that segment, reaching more than 300,000 SMEs and a 13% year-over-year increase in active SME clients. Furthermore, if we consider current accounts for businesses, as reported by the CMF, we have increased our business accounts by 31%, representing 33.5% of the market share as of April 2023. Getnet, our acquiring business, also continues to contribute to the success of attracting more SME clients. Getnet continues to focus on the development of companies of different sizes and improving customer experiences through the integrated payment solutions to business. In total, Getnet has now deployed more than 219,000 POSs across the country, with over 157,000 SMEs Getnet clients, which have been growing 83% year-over-year. In the six months of the year, Getnet has generated fees of CLP 21 billion. Some results on how productivity is being achieved through a committed and talented workforce are shown in page 12. We can see how our strategy is leading to a cost structure where it costs us less to serve our clients compared to our competitors. In terms of recurrence, our fees generated by our customers now cover almost 60% of our expenses, compared to an average of 43% in the industry. Our costs represent only 1.1% of our assets, compared to 1.5% in the industry, and the operating cost to serve our loans is 2.3%. Our cost per branch is CLP 3,144 million, compared to over CLP 4,000 million average per branch in the system. The cost per current account is CLP 0.35 million per account, less than half the industry average of CLP 0.8 million per account. These indicators show how the organization is transforming to be more agile, collaborative, and high performance. On page 13, in terms of NPS, we continue to lead our peers in service quality with 56 points. Over the last year, we have seen a slight dip in results due to ongoing improvements in cybersecurity for our two million digital clients. Our Life clients continue to surpass our other clients in satisfaction with the bank, with an NPS of 72 points, demonstrating the strength of our digital channels on our website and app. both score highly with 70 and 69 points respectively. Furthermore, Euromoney have recognized us as the best bank in Chile, demonstrating the impressive results of our strategy compared to our local peers. Another point to highlight was the progress made in our commitment to our responsible banking objectives. Our progress to meet our goals, such as diversity and inclusion, are well on track. We have a market-leading range of sustainable products that help care for climate change with Santander Bank, and in 2022, we managed to support numerous customers with sustainable operations in our businesses and corporate banking business. So far, in 2023, we have disbursed $140 million for green finance in the first half of the year. We believe that this will be one of the fastest-growing areas in the coming years. This has resulted in being ranked first in the main sustainability indices, such as Sustainalytics and MSCI. We are also the only Chilean bank included in the Dow Jones Sustainability Index for Global Emerging Bank, Emerging Companies. Now, let's talk about the trends in our results and balance sheet. On page 17, we show our results for the quarter. Our operating segments, that exclude the corporate centers and ALM, continue to perform well, with a 38.8% year-over-year increase in their net contribution, an important expansion in income lines, and fees, and fees with cost and risk under control, demonstrating the results of our strategy across the segments. The accumulated net income of, as of June 2023, totaled CLP 263 billion, decreasing 50% year-over-year. On the other hand, the book value of our equity increased 16% year-over-year, with our clean-up per share and dividend per share growing 23%. With those two effects of net income and equity, the accumulated ROE reached 12.9% in the first six months of 2023. Moving on to page 18, the results of Santander CIB, Corporate Investment Banking, have continued to be impressive, increasing 84.5% year-over-year. Net contribution from the middle market of corporates increased 38% year-over-year. Both of these commercial segments experienced an important rise in deposit spread, as well as high growth of fees and treasury income. The focus of these segments continues to be on non-lending activities, driving profitability. On slide 19, we can see that retail banking results increased 21% year-over-year, driven by the greater client base and more activity by our clients. Our active individual clients increased 4.2% year-over-year, and digital clients increased 1.3%, while our active SME clients have grown 13% compared to June last year. The margin increased 18.5% year-over-year, due to a better mix of funding and loan growth. Fees in this segment increased strongly by 29% year-over-year, driven by card fees, due to greater usage and increase in the client base, as well as the fees generated by Getnet. Provision increased 57% year-over-year, due to the normalization of the liquidity of our clients in recent periods. Operating costs increased in a controlled manner by 4.5% year-over-year, as the bank continues its digital transformation, generating greater operating efficiencies. In terms of loan growth, in the second quarter, loan growth remains subdued, as the economy continued to feel the effects of the high interest rates. During the quarter, the CIB segment decreased 1.4% quarter-over-quarter, as the short-term loan operation carried out in 2022 come due. The middle market segment's loan portfolio slightly increased 0.2% quarter-over-quarter, mainly driven by positive translation gains on U.S.-denominated loans. Earlier this year, we launched specialized attention models for the agro, automotive, and multilatina sectors, that will enhance loan and income growth in this sector in the coming quarters. Retail banking loans grew 1.3% QoQ, led by a 2.4% quarter-on-quarter growth in mortgage loans and a 1.3% in consumer loans. Origination of new mortgage loans has remained subdued due to a higher interest rates and the impact of the inflation on the value of the Unidad de Fomento. Regarding consumer loans, between the end of 2019 and 2021, these loans decreased 7%, as clients reduced large purchases such as travel and hotels, which fueled credit card loans. At the same time, many clients paid off credit card debts with the liquidity obtained from government transfers and pension fund withdrawals. At the end of 2022, as household liquidity levels returned to normal and holiday travel resumed, credit card loans began to grow again, increasing total balance compared to pre-pandemic levels. As for SMEs, the demand for new loans continued to remain subdued, as clients continued to pay back their forgiven loans dispersed in 2020 and 2021. Overall, loans have grown 3% year-over-year, and we maintain our guidance of year-over-year, year-over-year loan growth of mid-single digits. Slide 21. Liquidity levels remained strong in the quarter. The bank's total deposits increased 0.3% Q1Q and 2.2% year-over-year. The increase was driven by time deposits that increased 4.4% quarter-on-quarter and 25% year-over-year, as the high interest rates continue to attract clients. While our demand deposits have decreased 15.6% year-on-year, our market share in demand deposits has increased from 19.9% to 21.7%. Bonds issued increased 7% and 2.6% the last quarter. During the year, the bank has issued bonds for $1.7 million and CLP 383 billion, $30 million, and JPY 17.5 billion, taking advantage of attractive opportunities in the various fixed income markets, locally and abroad. The bank's liquidity coverage ratio, LCR, which measures the percentage of liquid assets over net cash outflows as of June 30, 2023, was 175%, well above the minimum. At the same date, the bank's net stable funding ratio, NSFR, which measures the percentage of illiquid assets financed through stable funding sources, reaches 109.4%, also well above the current legal minimum set for this ratio. In terms of margins, the bank's NIM in the quarter reached 2.2%. The valuation of the U.S. continued to decelerate, while short-term interest rates remained high. Both of these factors continued to weigh on the bank's NIM. As shown on this slide, this is mainly a phenomenon that affects our non-client NIM, or the net interest margin from our ALM activities, including the US GAAP and our liquidity. The client NIM, which is defined as NII from our businesses segments over interest-earning assets, has increased as deposits and loan spreads have risen. The bank is well positioned for a fall in real rates. The sensitivities to inflation and interest rates remain stable through the first quarter, with a 100 basis point drop in inflation will pressure down our NIMs by 15 basis points, and a 100 basis drop in the average interest rates will increase our NIM by 30 basis points. Given the negative U.S. variation in July and the recent 100 basis point drop in the monetary policy rate, we expect a U.S. variation of 4.3 and an average monetary policy rate of 10.3% for 2023, with our NIM showing signs of a solid recovery in the fourth quarter to reach an estimated total NIM of 2.3% for 2023. Moving on to asset quality on slide 23, NPL ratio rose to 2.1%, gradually returning to pre-pandemic levels as household liquidity levels return to normal and the economy feels the squeeze from high interest rates. The coverage of NPLs as of June 2023, reaches 165%, there has been no reversal of the voluntary provisions. As we can see on slide 24, these overall positive asset quality indicators led to our cost of credit of 1.19% in 2023, in line with our guidance for this year. On slide 25, we move on to non-NII revenue sources, which continue showing exceptional growth trends. Income from fees and treasury rose 61% compared to the second quarter of 2022, and 6.6% QoQ, driven by higher usage of flows in all segments. We expect these trends to continue in 2023. The global implementation of the new interchange fee regulation will start by year-end, and we estimate a negative impact in fees in 2024 of CLP 25 billion and CLP 47 billion in 2025. As shown on slide 26, we also can see the bank's efforts to continue increasing productivity and to control costs. Operating expenses decreased 7.5% year-over-year and increased 2.2% quarter-on-quarter. The bank continues ahead with its $260 million in technology investment plan for the years 2023-2025. Because of this investment, we are expecting costs to fall in absolute terms in 2023. Moving on to slide 27, we observe a positive evolution of our capital ratios. At the end of the second quarter of 2023, the bank reported a core equity ratio of 11% and a BIS ratio of 17.5% after the distribution of the annual dividend that amounted to 60% of the 2022 earnings. In May, the regulator announced that from next year, the Chilean banks will need to include a Countercyclical Capital Buffer of 0.5%. This, together with the conservation buffer of 2.5% and the systemic buffer for Santander of 1.5%, means that our minimum fully loaded CET1 will be 9.0% in December 2025. Below, on the right, we summarize the requirement levels by our regulator, including the potential buffer requirements and additional capital. On slide 29, we conclude with some guidance. Our strategy of a digital bank with network effect will continue to provide us with a greater digital client base and solid fee growth and impressive operating efficiencies. Our updated macro scenario for 2023 is now a GDP contraction of 1%, a UF variation of 4.3%, and an average interest rate of 10.3% for the year. In terms of loan growth, we expect mid-single-digit growth with a focus on all segments. As mentioned, the bank is well positioned for a fall in real rates, with further cuts in rates expected and a UF variation of 4.3% for the year, we expect NIMs of 2.3% for the full year, with solid client NIMs and with the upward trends to continue into the next year. Non-NII growth should surpass 20% this year on the back of strong client acquisition and usage figures. Cost control will be a major focus, we expect a decrease of low single digits in our total cost base. Asset quality has now almost normalized, the cost of risk should remain at a manageable level of 1.1%-1.2% for the rest of the year. In summary, due to our updated inflation expectations, we expect ROE to be in the neighborhood of 15% for the full year, and our long-term ROE expectations remain unaltered at 17%-19%. With this, I finish the presentation. Now we will gladly answer any questions you may have. I will come to the word to our moderator. Thank you very much for the presentation. We will now be moving to the Q&A part of the call. We already acknowledge the questions that came in. If you have any questions, please press star two on the keypad. That's star two on the keypad for any voice questions, and wait for your name to be called. You may also ask a voice or text question if you are dialed in via the web. Thank you very much. Our first question comes from Mr. Juan Recalde from Scotiabank. Please go ahead, sir. Hi, good morning, Emiliano, Cristian, Claudio, thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. I have two questions. I will ask the first one and then the second. The first one is in terms of NIM. The NIM projection for 2023 is expected now to be around 2.3%, and in the past, it was mentioned that in 2024, it could rebound to 3.3% or 3.5%. Under the current macro outlook, how do you see NIM in 2024? Hello, Juan. Thank you for your question. I mean, I think that what you mentioned still holds. Something like, we expect the NIM for this year to close around, I mean, by the fourth quarter, I mean, by the end of the year, to be around 3. For the next year, according to the real rates, we are anticipating for next year, I mean, combining rates to trajectory with the inflation slowdown, to be in the 3.5 area for the full year 2024. Thank you. My second question is related to this, because, next year, the FCIC facility is expected to be repaid, and my understanding is that also some derivatives will expire next year in the first half of the year. I was wondering if you can talk about the expected impact of these two factors, the FCIC facility being repaid and some derivatives expiring. Yeah, absolutely. In our case, I mean, the FCIC was mainly floated. I mean, for the for us, it's like a floating, floating rate liability. That's, it's in part what has been affecting our NIMs during the last two years because of interest rates, short-term interest rates being as high as they are and they were. The good part of this thing is that for us, the maturity or the expiration of the FCIC will be like, not, non-relevant for our, for our NII. The number of the NIM will improve because, let's say, we'll have a significant part of the balance sheet, like, deleveraging and, and falling with a, with a, a low NIM, and that will make the overall NIM of the bank to, to improve. Going to your question, in our case, the expiration of the FCIC will be non-material for the NII of the bank. Thank you for the comment. Okay, thank you very much. Our next question comes from Mr. Ernesto Gabilondo from Bank of America. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you. Hi, good morning, Emiliano, Claudio, and Cristian. Thanks for the opportunity to ask questions. My first question is on your ROE guidance. I remember you were guiding before between 15%-17%, now you're expecting the low part of the range because of the expectation of lower inflation levels. Just wondering, how should we think about the ROE next year and 2025? Just wanted to understand how would be approaching to your 17%-19% term target? My second question is on your reserve coverage ratio of 175%. Given your strategy to expand to the mid-to-high income segment in the consumer segment, what would be the level you will be comfortable to maintain for the next years? My final question is on your effective tax rate. We have seen it has benefited because of high inflation. Now thinking that we're going into a lower level of inflation, how should we think effective tax rate should be normalizing? Thank you. Okay. Thank you, Ernesto. Thank you for your question. I mean, I take the first one, and I, I leave the, the other two to Cristian. In terms of the ROE path going forward, I mean, we, we expect to be next year in the, in the long-term range that we are mentioning, I mean, from 17%-19%. How, and, and what part of that range will be, basically will depend on the, the path of rates. I mean, as I, I mentioned before, with the, with the mean for the year being around 3.5%, according to the, our expectation of, real rates next year being around like 2-2.2% for the full year. That will take us maybe closer to the, the, the higher part of the, of, of that range. In looking forward to 2025, which is really long- term, we still hold our long-term ROE range, and we think that we'll stay, we'll stay there. Hi, Ernesto, this is Cristian. Regarding your credit risk question, we, we are seeing the portfolio behaving at the 1-1.2 cost of credit levels. With the anticipated that we expected that the lower velocity of the economy is also, is also increasing a little our NPLs to levels pre-pandemic. We expect this situation to continue in this area. We are not seeing the portfolio deteriorating further, so we're comfortable with the 1-1.2 levels. Regarding the tax rate, the effective tax rate, tax rate, well, you know, Chilean banks, because of this inflation exposition, get their, their credit book, in terms of, the, the taxes, readjusted by inflation. A lower inflation will make our effective tax rates increasing in the coming quarters, and we expect it to get back to the levels we've seen when inflation is usually lower, so closer to 20%-23%. Perfect. Thank you very much, Emiliano. Cristian, just a follow-up in terms of the, you were mentioning captive risk, but in terms of your reserve coverage ratio, so you feel comfortable to maintain these levels? Well, that's a board decision, but we haven't made any, any decisions in order to take use of our additional provisions, so coverage should remain in the same area. Okay, perfect. Thank you very much. Okay, thank you. Thank you very much for that. The next question comes from Tito Labarta from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead, sir. Hi, good morning. Thank you for the call and for taking my question also. I have one question just on your, your fee income, the non-NII, which is growing around 20% this year. Just to think about how that can continue to evolve in 2024 and 2025. You know, how should we think about that non-NII growth going forward? Thank you. Hi, Tito, this is Cristian. Well, we're, we're having a very good year on non-NII and, and, and figures, so we're growing at higher than 20%. That's, that's very good news for us. We expect. Now, the reason this is happening is because we are increasing our customer base, and, and, and now we're, we're reaping the profits of that growth. We expect this trend to continue further, but to lower down a little. We're, we're looking at 10%-ish figures for the 2024 and 2025. Factoring in the, the headwind from the interchange fees going down in the next two years. Factoring in that, we, we think that we can be in the, in the low double digits growth in 2023. Okay, perfect. Thank you. Okay, thank you very much for the question. Next question comes from Mr. Yuri Fernandes from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead, sir. Hey, guys. Thank you very much. I have two questions, one on UF GAAP and the other on cost. Let's start with the UF GAAP. I saw that this quarter, your GAAP moved up. Just would like to understand the rationale here, because given inflation is moving lower, and you have been reducing your, your, your GAAP over the past quarters, I just would like to understand a little bit why the GAAP is higher now. I'm not sure if the cost of derivatives is moving up, it's, it, it has been high, more, more costly to hedge a disaster liability on UF, and this explain the higher GAAP. That's the first one. Regarding the cost, I would like to check your investment plan, right? You put out in the presentation the $260 million plan. This is not new, right? We knew about it. How much of the plan has been implemented this year? Your operating expenses are super, super attractive, super good, right? I think it's the other line, also no surprise. Given you have such a big investment plan, my concern is that you may need to accelerate the execution of this plan for 2024, 2025.... You know, these with higher taxes eventually may pressure your bottom line and your ROE target. Trying to understand, you know, like how much you are, like, asking about investment plan, to understand how your operating expenses may evolve in the near future. Thank you. Hello, Yuri. Thank you for your question. So regarding the US GAAP, as you mentioned, I mean, we in the second quarter increased. I mean, basically, that's because of derivatives that were expiring. I mean, like, let's say we had inflation locked in at high levels, and those derivatives expired. That produced, like, a net increase in the mismatch. And the reason why, let's say, we didn't keep it down, is basically because we saw that the inflation implied in the derivatives going forward is, like, in line with what we are expecting and considering the latest evolution of the FX rate. We even think that we can have some, let's say, upward pressure in headline inflation for the rest of the year. Basically, the decision is if we lock in what the market has today, which is around, like, 3%, depending on the term, but it's an inflation of 3%, we can, let's say, lock in that and reduce the gap. In that case, the adjustment will be lower, but the margin will be higher, or what we can expect from that 3%, which is implied. We don't see a clear call of the inflation being far away from what the derivatives are discounting. That connects to your point about the cost, that basically, when we hedge and when we operate in the derivatives market, we don't do it at mid prices. Basically, trying to lock in the 3% would imply to leave some basis points of inflation on the table when you hedge. That's why we are, let's say, comfortable, not because we don't feel that we are not growing the risk, but the level of the price we could hedge, it's reasonable for us, and that's why we keep. We don't expect to grow the gap further. It will stay, like, around where we were in the second in the second quarter, but that's the reason because why you saw the jump from first quarter to second quarter. Regarding cost going forward, I mean, our investment plan keeps the same. I mean, basically, our efforts are making room in, in, in OpEx general, to, to make room for investment, especially in all the digitalization and all the transformation of the, of the branches network. We, we keep our long-term target and ambition to have costs, all-in costs, growing below inflation, and that holds for, for next year to where, where we plan to, to have all-in expenses growing, growing below inflation, with inflation expectations being around 3% for next year. No, super clear. Cost below inflation for the next year, and the UF GAAP will remain around those, like, UF 7 billion, I think, those kind of level, right? Those are the takes. Thank you very much. Yeah. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from Daniel Mora-Ardila from Credicorp Capital. Please go ahead, Daniel. Your line is open. Hi, good morning, and thank you for the presentation. I have just two questions. The first one is a follow-up regarding the NIM. I would like to understand that negative part that is impacting currently the NIM related to the swap of interest rates, how it's going to evolve with the decrease in interest rates expected for the rest of 2023 and also beginning of 2024? What could be the impact of the expiration of the FCIC related to these swap of interest rates? Just to, just to understand what will be the process there. The second question is regarding to NPLs. We have seen in recent quarters that the commercial NPL has been above peers and also above the industry level. I would like to understand if you are seeing any risk in any company or any economic sector that you have explained this performance, and what would be the expectation going forward? Thank you so much. Hello, Daniel, thank you for your questions. I'll take the first one, and I'll leave the second one for Cristiano. Regarding the NIM path and the non-clients, I mean, that negative will, let's say, rebound, I mean, to positive territory in the coming quarters. I mean, we basically expect that to be more closer to the 0.5% negative during the next year in order to have the clients NIMs around 4% and the non-clients in the -0.5, and that adds up to the 3.5% we were talking before. I mean, basically, the main driver of the non, of the non-clients NIM improving is the fell in interest rates, short-term interest rates, combined with the process of getting the curve steeper from where we are now. I mean, we have a very steep curve on the negative slope territory, and going forward, we'll have that going more to flat at the beginning and gaining some positive slope by the end of next year, and that will help the non-client NIM because of the positive slope of the curve. Connecting that with the FCIC, basically, in that case, considering that we have that liability floated, we will benefit in the next quarter to the reduction of the interest rate, that will reduce the cost of that. At the maturity will be kind of neutral for us because basically we have short-term assets to pay that off. Basically, we have, if you want the monetary policy rates, assets falling together with a liability that for us is also floated to the monetary policy rate. We'll be kind of neutral or not much relevant for our NII going forward because an asset and a liability with a similar yield will, let's say, go away with the expiration of that. Hi, Daniel, this is Cristian. Regarding your NPL question in the commercial portfolio, actually, the commercial NPL has increased from 2.5% to 2.9% in the first six months of the, of the year, and our impaired loan ratio about, has increased from 7% to 7.6% in the first six months of the, of the year. All you know, we are, we are seeing a slight deterioration in the SMEs, portfolio, but, it's nothing to, to be really concerned on the, on the higher lending names. We, we haven't seen the middle market or the CIB portfolio actually being very stressed. I will say that the sectors that we are seeing are, are agro and some construction, but those are very, very, a small part of our total portfolio. There's some, some, further details on page 38 of the management commentary. Okay, thank you so much for the answers. Okay, thank you very much. next question comes from Miss Isabelle Irish from Baring Asset Management. Please go ahead, ma'am, your line is open. Hello, my, my question is actually on NIM, which was partially answered before, but an extension to that is on the funding cost. I, I see the switch as you would get as interest rates are high, the switch from demand to time deposits. How sticky is that? Does that persist for a long time, and how quickly does that go, do that shift back? Thank you. Thank you, Isabelle, for your question. Well, what we are seeing is the, the, the, the reasonable economic decision of a person that has money in their accounts, and it's moving them to, to time deposits to, to attain the benefits of a higher interest rate. Demand deposits, demand deposits are paying 0 in Chile, and time deposits are paying about 1% per month for the last 12 months. That we are seeing a trend of re-portfolioing of our deposits, that we expect to start reversing once the interest rates in, in, in the monetary policy rate in the coming months starts further decreasing. We, we don't have sensibilities yet of how this effect will evolve, but for definitely, we are going to see a further movement, a further reduced movement from demand to time deposits. Thank you. Okay. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from Neha Agarwala from HSBC Global Research. Please go ahead, ma'am. Hi, thank you for taking my question. Just one quick question? How should we think about the asset quality trend and cost of risk for next year? This year we are seeing some normalization, but should we see some stability in 2024? Any other headwinds in terms of going back to normalized levels of ROE for 2024, that we should watch out for, any reason why the ROE for 2024 should deviate from the normalized ROE level? Thank you so much. I mean, in terms of asset quality, I mean, well, remember that, and cost of risk, I mean, for next year, I mean, we, we, we still hold a significant amount of voluntary provisions, that, that will, let's say, serve as a kind of backstop in, in case that, the behavior, the, the asset quality deteriorates. We, we, we feel comfortable to, to be around the 1.1%-1.2%. We are, we are in terms of cost of risk, I mean, having the, the, the possibility of, of tapping the, the voluntary provisions in case the situation goes, goes worse. In terms of the risk for the, the path to normal ROE next year, basically, I would say that it goes to, again, to the, to the NIM part, because as I just mentioned, the, the, the asset quality part, we feel, like, comfortable to, to stay around there. In terms of NIMs, will depend on, on how this reduction of real rates goes going forward. Chile already started the cycle, and then Brazil followed, and we have the, the developed, developed economies still in the tightening part of the cycle. Going forward, we, but, but by the end of next year, we see nominal rates in the. 4, 4.5% by the end of next year, and that implicitly has also the Fed and the developed countries starting easing cycles by the, the second half of, of next year. If you put yourself in a scenario where that doesn't happen and inflation internationally stays up, and developed economies doesn't, don't start their recent cycles, you can argue that the, the floor for the rate in Chile would be maybe higher than that, 4%-5%, and that will create some pressure on the, on the NIM normalization for, for, for us. That's maybe one of the, the things that could deviate the, the path to, to normal priorities. Apart from that, I don't see... I don't know, Cristian, if you, if you see any other? Well, not, not, not really. I'll, I'll, I will, I will reinforce Emiliano's point. While Actually, the rate path and the, the, the inflation are probably the, the main, the main effects to be monitoring, and we, we are seeing the asset quality stable from what we are looking at now. We're confident that we can deliver on our, on our cost figures and, and, and fees, what, what we already mentioned and what we expect. I would say, all in all, we, we feel that we are going back into our regular work profitability levels of the, of the pre-pandemic. Yeah. Thank you so much. Okay, thank you very much. Our final question comes from Mr. Ewald Stark Bittencourt from BICE Inversiones. Please go ahead, sir, your line is open. Hello, thanks for taking my question. You mentioned earlier in the presentation that FOGAPE loans will reactivate SME trade growth. I was wondering, what's the expected margin on these FOGAPE loans, and how do they compare to normal, normal margins on SME loans? Yeah. Thank you. Thank you for the question. Yes, I mean, basically, in the SMEs portfolio, we have like two forces. I mean, first, we have like the maturity of the initial FOGAPE loans that were granted in 2020, 2021. Those are, let's say, maturing and going away. Those were set with very low rates because we are the prevailing rates at that moment. Those were really low yielding and low spread loans, and those are going away. The new ones, the new FOGAPE loans, where the program itself was set in this new rate environment. Actually, the, the, the, the spread is, is not as low as it was at the beginning, and it's in line or slightly higher than the average spread for SMEs. That, your question regarding if you want the, the, the average spread of the portfolio, the dynamic of the old ones going away and the new ones entering at average or slightly higher than average spread for the portfolio, it's a tailwind for the average spread of the SMEs going forward. The program is still, still there, and it's a significant part of the new origination in SMEs. It's different to the original one, where in terms of pricing was a kind of a sacrifice for us. In this case, it's more, more in line with the rest of the, of the portfolio. Okay, perfect. Thanks. Okay, thank you very much. It looks like we have no further questions at this point. I'll pass the line back to the management team for the concluding remarks. Thank you all very much for taking the time to participate in today's call. We look forward to speaking with you again soon. Thank you very much. This concludes today's conference call. We'll now be closing all lines. Thank you and goodbye.