Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Q1 2026 Fixed Income Conference Call and Live Webcast. I'm Moritz, the Chorus Call operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in a listen-only mode, and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a question- and- answer session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Philip Teuchner, Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir. Good afternoon or good morning. Thank you all for joining us today. On the call, our Group Treasurer, Richard Stewart, will take us through some fixed income specific topics. For the subsequent Q&A session, we also have our CFO, Raja Akram, with us to answer your questions. The slides that accompany the topics are available for download from our website at db.com. After the presentation, we will be happy to take your questions. Before we get started, I just want to remind you that the presentation may contain forward-looking statements which may not develop as we currently expect. Therefore, please take note of the precautionary warning at the end of our materials. With that, let me hand over to Richard. Thank you, Philip, and welcome from me. We are very pleased with our first quarter performance. We proved our resilience in an environment of heightened uncertainty and delivered record net profits as we continue to build on our strong foundations. Both our key metrics improved over the already strong prior year quarter. Post-Tax Return on Tangible Equity rose to 12.7%, and our Cost-Income Ratio improved to below 59%. This gives us a strong start on our path towards our targets. We generated revenues of EUR 8.7 billion, up 2% or 6% excluding FX impacts, even against the strong performance in the prior year quarter, driven by focused growth areas and improving business mix. Costs reflect disciplined execution of our strategy. We self-funded investments by realizing efficiencies as planned. Our capital position is solid. We finished the quarter with a CET1 ratio of 13.8%, well within our operating range of 13.5%-14%. Looking at our divisional performance on slide three, two points are clear. First, earnings mix and balance are improving. Our non-investment banking businesses with more predictable earning streams account for a larger share of group profits compared to the same quarter of last year. Second, we have delivered strength across the board. All four divisions are due to return on tangible equity of either close to or well above 13%. The private bank increased client assets by EUR 30 billion since the start of the year, with net assets under management inflows of EUR 11 billion, primarily driven by investment products. Asset Management achieved EUR 11 billion of total net flows, mainly in passive and cash. DWS agreed to acquire a 40% minority stake in Nippon Life India AIF Management Limited, reinforcing our asset-gathering capacity. Corporate banks saw sustained momentum in growing business volumes year-on-year, with loans up 6% and deposits up 2%. Investment bank performance was again very solid this quarter. We continue to support our clients in volatile markets, with client activity up 8% despite a very strong prior year. Some thoughts on slide four on our strategic direction in a dynamic operating environment where recent geopolitical developments continue to underscore the importance of resilience and disciplined execution. While the outlook for the global economy might be uncertain, the current conflict underlines Europe's need for self-reliance and strategic autonomy and investment in defense and other capabilities. When it comes to Germany, we want to reiterate that despite lower forecasted growth rates in 2026, our medium-term view is unchanged, as there are tailwinds from fiscal stimulus, and we see scope for further measures going beyond the reform framework announced earlier this month. We will continue to actively leverage our leadership position in Germany. We see significant growth opportunities, including private sector investments and reforms and defense and infrastructure plans. From a risk perspective, we have very limited direct exposure to the Middle East. Our portfolio performance remains well within our expectations, and we continue to monitor clients across industries. In line with our disciplined risk framework, we put in place a management overlay to reflect broader macroeconomic uncertainties. Looking ahead, we reaffirm our confidence in reaching our strategic goals and 2028 financial targets. Much of the upside we talked about in November is already visible, providing operational flexibility to reach our financial plan and create potential for further outperformance. We are encouraged by the progress made across our levers and the enhanced collaboration across our divisions. AI is advancing rapidly, and we are working closely across businesses and functions to make sure we deliver maximum productivity and enhance client experience. Overall, we see positive momentum in our operating environment. Turning to treasury-specific topics, starting with our net balance sheet on slide 5. We continue to operate with a strong conservative balance sheet underpinned by robust capital and liquidity buffers that comfortably exceed regulatory requirements and support the group across cycles. Loans and deposits continue to be of high quality, underpinned by a strong domestic footprint and a large base of insured retail deposits. Our funding profile is well-balanced, anchored in a stable deposit base and long-term issuances. This strength allows us to support clients, absorb volatility, and invest selectively in growth opportunities. Moving to capital on slide six. Starting with the CET1 ratio, we ended the quarter at 13.8%, down 38 basis points compared to the fourth quarter, but squarely in line with our target operating range. Net income, net of deductions for AT1 coupons, contributed 53 basis points, reflecting strong first quarter earnings, while deductions for distributions of 32 basis points represent the 60% payout ratio from 2026. Other deductions of 11 basis points mainly relate to equity compensation, partly offset by reduced capital deduction items. Turning to Risk-Weighted Assets, RWA increased by EUR 12 billion, excluding FX effects of EUR 2 billion. This was driven mainly by EUR 6 billion of business growth in credit risk RWA, notably in loans in the Corporate Bank and Investment Bank, but also from derivatives and secured financing transactions. Market risk contributed an additional EUR 2 billion of RWA. Other includes changes in operational risk RWAs and smaller model effects from updates to the existing models. Our capital ratios remain well above regulatory requirements, as shown on slide seven. The CET1 MDA buffer now stands at 260 basis points or EUR 9 billion of CET1 capital. The quarter-on-quarter decrease reflects the lower CET1 ratio from our business growth investments net of the reduction in the CET1 ratio requirement. The buffer to the total capital requirement is 270 basis points, a further decrease compared to the CET1 MDA, mainly from the AT1 call and Tier 2 maturity haircuts. On the leverage side, we ended the quarter at 4.4%, which is 12 basis points down versus the prior quarter, leaving us with an MDA buffer of EUR 12 billion. The increase of EUR 2 billion compared to the prior quarter is driven by a reduction in our minimum requirement from 3.85%- 3.6%, offset by a reduction in capital from our AT1 call and the increase in leverage exposure. We continue to operate with significant loss absorbing capacity well above all requirements, as shown on slide 8. Compared to the presentation in the prior quarter, we now show the requirements in percent of RWA instead of absolute euro numbers. On the right-hand side of the slide, we show our MREL surplus both as a ratio as well as in absolute euro numbers. The MREL surplus of EUR 17 billion continues to provide us with the flexibility to pause issuing new eligible liabilities for at least one year. The MREL requirement will reduce by approximately 100 basis points in the second quarter based on the decision we receive from the resolution authorities. This will increase our surplus by around EUR 3.5 billion. On slide nine, we can see that our liquidity and funding profile remained very strong in the first quarter. Our liquidity coverage ratio was 140%, which keeps us comfortably above the regulatory minimum. Compared to the seasonally elevated year-end position, both HQLA and the surplus above requirements normalized in the first quarter, while the overall liquidity position remained robust. We ended the quarter with EUR 245 billion of High Quality Liquid Assets, the composition of that buffer continues to be very strong with the large majority held in cash and Level 1 securities. The daily average LCR for the quarter was 139%, very close to the quarter-end level, which underlines the consistency of our liquidity position throughout the period. Our Net Stable Funding Ratio was 119%, while available stable funding increased to EUR 651 billion. Overall, this continues to underscore the resilience and diversification of our liquidity and funding base. Looking at the development of the loan book on slide 10. During the first quarter, loans grew by EUR 5 billion, adjusted for FX effects. The underlying quality of the loan book remains strong, reflecting our conservative underwriting standards across all businesses. In the private bank, we continue the intended portfolio rebalancing by growing our wealth management franchise and delivering further reductions in the German mortgage book. Loans increased in the corporate bank, where we saw encouraging growth in our trade finance business. Within FIC financing, the steady growth path continued, driven by new loan originations across segments. For the remainder of the year, we see further growth opportunities across all businesses, while our focus remains on value accretion and capital discipline. Moving now to deposits on slide 11. Our well-diversified deposit book reduced by EUR 8 billion- EUR 687 billion during the first quarter, adjusted for FX effects. The reduction in the group deposit base is primarily driven by the Corporate Bank, where we saw a normalization of balances from the year-end spot peak, in line with our expectations and prior guidance. In the private bank, deposit balances remain broadly stable, supported by continued underlying campaign inflows in Germany. The portfolio continues to be of high quality, supported by a strong domestic footprint and a substantial level of insured retail deposits. Looking ahead, our focus remains on maintaining a high portfolio quality and growing SVA accretive deposits both in the private bank and corporate bank. Moving to net interest income on slide 12. NII was strong at EUR 3.5 billion in the key banking book segments and other funding. Deposit related NII has been stable over the past year as we have successfully offset the headwinds with interest rates with volume growth in our hedge portfolio and anticipate tailwinds going forward. Looking at the divisions, the private bank continued to show steady margin progression driven by increasing deposit revenues in both personal banking and wealth management. The corporate bank net interest income was stable with clear signs of the rate headwinds on deposit NII diminishing compared to the prior quarter. In FIC financing, revenues remain strong, supported by ongoing loan growth. For the full year 2026, we expect NII across key banking book segments and other funding to increase to around EUR 14 billion. The performance in the first quarter and the current view for long term rates gives us conviction for the 2028 targets we outlined at the IDD. On slide 13, which is based on the market implied forward rates as per the end of March, you can see that the hedge portfolio provides increasing annual contributions. The yield of maturing hedges this year is around 40 basis points on average. These hedges are reinvested at the current 10-year swap rate of around 3%. More than 90% of the hedge contribution for 2026 is locked in given our rolling structure. The total volume invested longer term stands at around EUR 200 billion. While the growth of the hedge portfolio income will depend on future market developments, we currently see a positive slope at least until 2030. Let us now look at our issuance plan on slide 14. Markets have obviously been challenging due to geopolitical uncertainty and as a consequence, primary market activity has been lower than usual. Nonetheless, we have continued to make progress on our issuance plan. As of end of April, we have issued a total of EUR 6 billion out of our EUR 10 billion-EUR 15 billion plan for the year, mainly driven by five benchmark transactions in three currencies. Following the EUR 1 billion Tier 2 transaction in January, we issued our tightest U.S. dollar denominated Senior Non-Preferred bond in early February, as well as a EUR 500 million EUR Green Non-Preferred Bond, our first under the European Green Bond format. Later in March, we further diversified our investor base and issued our first multi-tranche Panda bond transaction totaling CNY 5.5 billion. This represents the largest Panda bond issuance by a commercial bank so far. In early April, we issued our second U.S. dollar denominated Senior Non-Preferred transaction this year, which despite the geopolitical uncertainty, attracted over $6 billion in total orders. This allowed us to price a $1 billion transaction with minimal concession. We also successfully completed a tender offer for several of our Pfandbrief benchmarks, repurchasing 1.6 billion EUR, which will help manage our Pfandbrief curve going forward. To sum up on slide 15. First, we are confident in our revenue ambition of around EUR 33 billion, supported by key banking book NII and other funding growing to around EUR 14 billion, as well as growth in net commission and fee income. The market implied expectations around interest rates are a tailwind and adding to our conviction around this number. Second, as demonstrated, we remain firmly committed to disciplined strategy execution. On costs and our investment plans, we confirm our expense guidance and expect a gradual increase throughout the year in line with what we said at the IDD while retaining flexibility. In the second quarter, we expect increases in expenses primarily from restructuring and severance costs in the private bank to support our business-led front to back optimization agenda and generate in-year efficiencies as well as hiring across divisions. Third, we reiterate our guidance for provision for credit losses for 2026. Asset quality remains strong and portfolios are performing in line with expectations. We remain vigilant given the evolving macroeconomic environment and took a management overlay which may not be eventually needed when the Middle East situation normalizes. Fourth, we are comfortable with the trajectory in profitability and continue to expect strong operating performance in 2026. Finally, we are well progressed with our issuances after an active 1st quarter and reflecting the lower senior issuance requirements for this year. With that, we look forward to your questions. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question- and- answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Questioners on the phone are requested to disable the loudspeaker mode and eventually turn off the volume from the webcast while asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. One moment for the first question, please. The first question will come from Yan Zhu from Autonomous. Please go ahead. Hi. Thanks for the presentation. We got three questions, please. The first one is on MREL. At Q4, you discussed a potential Senior Non-Preferred downgrade at Moody's due to the lower issuance. We would like to understand, is there still the case and when do you expect this to happen? Outlook. Will you confirm your NII outlook for this year or not, and what is the upside from the higher rate? Lastly, on RWA, can you also comment on your RWA expectations following the strong increase in the first quarter, please? Thank you very much. Thanks, Yan, and thank you for joining. Apologies, I couldn't quite hear all of your questions, but I think there was a question on RWA growth. I think there's one on NII, but I didn't quite catch the first one on. Was it on MREL and Moody's? I couldn't quite understand the question. If you could just repeat it. Yeah. The Moody's one is related to MREL. We see [inaudible]. We want to understand if this is still the case, and when do you expect this to happen? Do you expect any CMDI-related rating action as well? Okay. Fine. Why don't I sort of take them in. Well, let's just deal with the first one first then, on MREL. As you know, in Q, what we announced in January, we're gonna give up the LGF times in the LGF 10% Moody's rating uplift that we had. As you know, Moody's did come out with an announcement in February which said that our deposit rating would be moved to positive outlook, and our issuer rating for senior preferred rating will be stable. What that does, and how we kind of, how we think about that is we kind of think that Moody's is already reflecting the potential impact from CMDI and LGF to some degree with that reflection in the senior rating. There's positive outlook on the deposits and stable on the Senior Preferred rating. There is no specific rating for Senior Non-Preferred, it doesn't come with a dedicated outlook. What we're saying is that, you know, Moody's has already, in our opinion, kind of reflected the impact in its assessment of us. Positive for deposits, stable for Senior Preferred, that's both it for, in our opinion, for reflecting LGF and the CMDI regulation. What we're trying to do is work with them to try and minimize that rating volatility. Ideally, we'll be able to resolve the fundamental outlook on the deposits as well as the final action on CMDI without too much impact from today's ratings. Hopefully that clarifies your question. In terms of NII outlook, in general, higher rates are beneficial for Deutsche Bank's NII, as you can consistently see in our sensitivity disclosures. Current market implied rates are higher than what we use for planning for IDD at both the long and the short end, which will result in tailwinds compared to our expectations both this year and in 2028. Our remaining sensitivity, as you can see from the slides, is quite limited for 2026, but we still have a material portion of our hedge book to roll over by 2028, so the tailwind there remains subject to developments in market conditions. Now, while we're not changing our overall revenue guidance for 2026 nor 2028, the interest rate developments clearly support confidence in meeting and potentially outperforming those targets that we have laid out. In terms of ROA expectations, let me start by saying that the first quarter ROA increase that you saw was a bit exceptional for us, driven by a few factors. The growth in the first quarter can certainly not be extrapolated to future quarters. First of all, the quarter-on-quarter increase included EUR 2 billion for FX moves. It also included EUR 2 billion higher market risk RWA, reflecting a lower year-end 2025 starting point, and sort of more normalized kind of level reflecting also the first quarter volatility. Operational risk RWA equally rose by EUR 2 billion. We don't expect either of these to repeat in the second quarter. The second point I'd make is ex FX credit RWA grew by EUR 8 billion in the quarter, mostly in the investment bank, where we executed on market opportunities in our financing businesses, but also saw increases related to market volatility, notably in derivatives and SFT related credit exposure. This explains EUR 6 billion of the EUR 8 billion credit RWA growth. The corporate bank and private bank explain the balance whereby growth was much more moderate to around EUR 1 billion in each division. Let me just sort of take you back to what we said at IDD last year. The private bank, we will reduce ROA from exiting sub-hurdle mortgages whilst increasing capital deployment in wealth management. That's kind of part of the strategy. In the corporate bank, we will optimize within our trade finance and lending book, exiting negative SCA portfolios and shifting to more rewarding relationships. To be clear, when doing this, the value from the overall client is paramount for us and not just individual asset returns. When we bring all that together, we expect significantly lower business-driven ROA growth in the second quarter, and thereafter, nothing comparable to what we saw the, in the first quarter. Of course, the ROA benefits from new SRT transactions will also continue to improve the velocity of the balance sheet, and free up additional ROA capacity throughout the year. Hopefully that gives you a little bit more color as to what we're thinking around ROA for the rest of the year. The next question comes from Lee Street from Citigroup. Please go ahead. Hello, good afternoon, and thank you for taking my questions. The first one, I'd just like to ask about your thoughts on UniCredit's tender for Commerzbank, but specifically in terms of the impact on the banking sector in Germany. Any potential impact you might see on Deutsche Bank's competitive position domestically. I guess finally, just obviously, the German government's had a very strong pushback, what you think that means for European banking union for cross-border M&A, all those type of things. That'd be my first question. The second question, again, on RWAs, and it links to the last question. There's always been an increase in the share of investment bank-related assets over recent quarters. Also, you're taking actions to, you know, which will allow some of the RWAs in the private bank and corporate bank. Should I be expecting the share of investment bank RWAs of overall RWAs to carry on increasing? Is there an upper limit? That would be my questions. Thank you. Hi there. This is Raja. Let me take the questions. Look, well, it's not in my position to comment on potential transactions that are in the market between two competitors. I would just reassure you from our perspective, it doesn't change our plan or our strategy or our competitive position. We are a market leader already. In fact, some of the returns and targets that the proposal puts out there as a potential accomplishment of if this merger goes through, we are, from a competitive perspective in Germany, are pretty are already there. It does not put us at a competitive disadvantage. In fact, from my perspective and our perspective, if this transaction does go through, I think there's certainly an opportunity for Deutsche Bank to, in certain cases, take market share. If you look at a corporate banking side, most clients would like to have at least two corporate banking relationships. In certain instances, their relationships might be the two banks that actually end up merging. From our perspective, we could see an outcome where actually this might actually be slightly net positive for us. We certainly don't see it as a disadvantage. Our banks competes on being global, with a 60-country network. Most of the clients that we serve want products and investment banking advice, along with just pure, domestic, corporate banking relationships. Net-net, I think, whether this merger goes through or doesn't go through doesn't change our strategy. But I could envision a situation where it actually turns out to be a little bit net positive, both in terms of talent as well as from a client intake perspective. On the whole, I think, obviously, the German government has its position, but the German government has also been very clear that we are. We are also very supportive that we need to make Europe more competitive, and there should be an ability for more cross-border merger. I don't think that's necessarily a bad thing, whether it's in the financial services sector or outside of financial services sector. I think, anything that makes Europe more competitive from my perspective and our perspective is welcome. It relates to your IB, RWA question. I think Richard explains that this was a little bit of an unusual quarter from us from an RWA growth perspective, 'cause obviously the market risk RWA primarily impacts also IB. The other thing that you have to see is that we are actually really growing the asset light part of our businesses, meaning asset management and corporate banking as well as private bank. They naturally take and consume less RWA than the investment bank. In essence, if we continue to grow those businesses and maintain our competitive position, in certain quarters, it might look like a bigger chunk of the RWA allocation went to IB. That's not the strategy that we are going with it. At the Investor Day, I think if you look at our Investor Day guidance, we basically said that the consumption of the portion of RWA consumed by the investment bank is gonna kind of stay the same as it was in 25, but with obviously a much larger contribution, which means even inside the investment bank, we're gonna try to grow the capital-light businesses. Now I don't think that, as Richard said, I don't think you should extrapolate the RWA growth this quarter as something that would be repetitive. Neither should we look at the percentage of RWA allocated to IB as a new normal or an aspired state. Our goal is to actually keep our best-in-class FICC business performing, but at the same time increase the revenue and the profit before taxes from our non-RWA consuming businesses. All right. That is very clear, actually. Thank you very much for those answers. As a reminder, anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one at this time. It looks like there are no further questions at this time. I would like to turn the conference back over to Philip Teuchner for any closing remarks. Thank you, Moritz. Just to finish up, thank you all for joining us today. You know where the IR team is if you have any further questions. We look forward to talking to you soon again. Goodbye, and have a nice day. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now concluded, and you may disconnect. Thank you for choosing Chorus Call, and thank you for joining the conference. Goodbye.