Thank you very much, and good morning to all of you. A warm welcome to our Q3 interim statement conference call. I hope that you're all well and are not impacted or even infected by Corona or the newly implemented lockdown measures so far. Well, as you know, we have always a full presentation on the cumulative figures and presenting to you all the respective highlights. But as you know, we in this conference call will only hop to the most recent developments which are relevant for this Q3 report. As you might be aware, we converted our outstanding hybrid convertible, which we issued in 2017 and 2019, on October 4 mandatorily. The reason for that is quite an efficiency reason. Due to the very strong increase of our share price in 2019 and 2020, the hybrid convertible's price moved or developed parallel to the share price, and so therefore, it was meaningless for the hybrid convertible owners to keep that paper instead of the shares. It was to be expected that they would convert their hybrid convertible into shares, which already was done on August 5 and September 24 by several investors. To streamline that process, we decided to mandatorily convert all remaining outstanding hybrid convertibles on October 4 into shares. Why do I reiterate that? I would like to confirm to you that this does have no impact on earnings per share in 2021. It does not have any impact on total assets, equity or equity ratios. Well, ladies and gentlemen, as you might know, we are pretty backloaded in our own portfolio with the investments. Usually during the course of the year, we usually invest mostly in the second half of the year and a very big portion in Q4. That applies to this year as well. In May, we acquired Paltusmäki, a 22 MW wind farm in Finland. In the course of the last 3 weeks, we announced 3 acquisitions. Firstly, it was Gohlsdorf, an acquisition which we announced on 21st of October. This is a new solar farm which is to be built in Brandenburg, which is nearby to Berlin. Those who participate in the capital markets saw our last physical Capital Markets Day when we visited our Brandenburg solar farm, so it is not too far away from that area. A 25 MW new acquisition here from strategic development partner, Sunovis. 6 days later, on the 27th of October, we announced that we started the construction of the new park, Ringkøbing, which is at the Danish west coast of the North Sea. 12 MW is a small park, but what is worthwhile to note here, firstly, it is our first park, a solar farm in Denmark, and it comes from the strategic development partnership with GreenGo Energy, with whom we have a strategic development partnership of 500+ MW. The most recent acquisition was then 2 weeks later on the 12th of November, last Friday, we announced that we Encavis acquired 5 solar farms in the Netherlands with a total generation capacity of 74 MW. Here from Statkraft, by the way, and precisely from the former Solarcentury, which was acquired by Statkraft. 3 of such 5 solar farms are already connected to the grid. They do have a total capacity of 50 MW. The remaining 2 are almost fully built, so they are done. All the equipment is in place. There is no logistics issue which could happen here. It is only a question of acceptance by the authorities that these parks will be connected to the grid within the next weeks or months. All these parks are receiving fixed tariffs for 15 years under the Dutch subsidy scheme, SDE+. In total, as of today, Encavis added, so with that, 133 MW of new capacity to our own portfolio, mostly solar and what is worthwhile to note, the last 3 ones out of strategic development partnerships which we outlined during our last Capital Markets Day some weeks ago. Having said that, 133 MW so far and the year is by far not over yet, so more parks are expected. As we pointed out, this is sometimes timing-wise, a little bit beyond our control due to authorizations which are outstanding. Well, the asset management was quite busy as well this year. In this quarter, they were successful in investing in 4 new parks for Encavis Infrastructure Fund II, which is the fund which is designed for savings banks and smaller cooperative banks which are participating in that fund. They acquired a solar farm portfolio as well as wind farm portfolio, the solar farm portfolio in Germany, the wind farm portfolio in France, and put both together almost 120 MW. Encavis Infrastructure Fund III, which is a special fund for Versicherungskammer Bayern. Here they invested 66 MW into a solar portfolio in Western and Southern France. In addition to that, and this is honestly said, there are so many things happening there, we forgot to mention it here. On the 29th of September, we announced that Encavis Asset Management, together with BayernLB, designed the new Encavis Infrastructure Fund IV, which is about to be placed in the market next year with a total volume of EUR 500 million funds volume for further investment. This is important to foster the growth of Encavis Asset Management in the years to come. Regarding financing, within that quarter, we announced on 16th of August that we could sign a sustainable ESG revolving credit facility. This is a very long name for a quite unique thing. Maybe you're aware that all our parks or most of our parks are financed non-recourse on SPV level. So all cash goes firstly either to the financing bank on SPV level and then to Encavis AG. Having said that, all debt on corporate level is structurally subordinated to the debt on SPV level. We consider this to be a success, which is by the way, unique in the renewables market, that we have an unsecured, committed draw down facility from 5 renowned banks like Commerzbank, Rabobank, BayernLB, DZ Bank, and Landesbank Baden-Württemberg, who together guarantee us whenever we need EUR 25 million of working capital facility and EUR 100 million of revolving line. That is, for us, very important because as we pointed out, the decision-making of the authorities in Europe is sometimes timing-wise, surprising. Sometimes they speed up dramatically, sometimes they are pretty slow. For how long have we to keep the money in place to pay the developer for the development? This draw down facility makes it very efficient to draw down the amount of money needed for the acquisition of a park whenever the authorization is given. This sustainable ESG revolving credit facility became possible on the back of our investment grade rating by Scope rating. We have a BBB- here. This is unique in the renewables market in Europe as well for a pure-play, non-utility player of our size. That helps us or helped us to convince the banks. Well, let's come to the figures. First, let's have a look on the Q3 figures isolated, so without the first half. In the end, and first of all, at the management summary, the picture is the same or similar to that one what we have seen the first 2 quarters of 2021, but somewhat better. We have had an energy production in the 3rd quarter of 778 GWh, which is 55% or 277 GWh more than in previous year's 3rd quarter. If we look more into the details, then we see that the existing portfolio, which was already in place in 2019 to 2020, produced this year 31 gigawatt hours or 7% less than in the previous year's quarter. That is due to weaker meteorological situation. On the back of the 778 gigawatt hours, we realized revenues of EUR 97 million, which is 22% more than previous year's quarter. The same applies to EBITDA and EBIT and operating EPS. We have now a more sound development of our figures, not so much extremely deteriorated by meteorological issues because the meteorological impact now is smaller compared to the additional energy production of our newly connected to the grid parks. What we consider to be a progress is the development of the earnings per share under which we realized EUR 0.19 in Q3 2021 compared with EUR 0.15 in the last year's quarter. The operating cash flow improved by 51%, up to EUR 77.7 million in that reported quarter. Well, if we have a look now on the cumulative figures, then we see what this quarter means to our figures so far. We produced in the first 9 months 2.2 terawatt-hours of electricity, which is 35% more than previous year or 569 gigawatt-hours more. If we look just in the existing portfolio, which was there in place in the first 9 months in the previous years already, we see the reduction of the energy produced by 11%. Now we added the 2nd quarter, after the 2nd quarter, now the 3rd quarter to the overall figures, and therefore, coming down is a very harsh reduction of energy production in our existing portfolio, which we suffered in the 1st quarter due to very poor weather in that 1st quarter. The revenue now increased to EUR 260 million or almost EUR 260 million, EUR 25 million up compared to previous year, +11%. As a matter of fact, we see here the effect from the 1st quarter usually have revenues, EBITDA and EBIT increase with almost the same percentage as the revenues. This is still not the case due to the disturbing figures of the 1st quarter, where we had a huge lack due to meteorological effects. Please have in mind that in these quarters, lack of meteorological revenues leads to the same figure, lack of figures in EBITDA and EBIT. The figures are reduced 100% all through the way through the P&L. While the addition of new revenues from new parks are reflected into the EBITDA and EBIT only with a respective margin because these revenues come along with additional cost. That's the reason why the operating EPS is in total up to now EUR 0.05 below the cumulative figure of previous year. If we take out that pure meteorological effect, then only for calculation purposes and to see that the growth of the company is healthy, is that we increased the revenues and the EBITDA and EBIT by solid double-digit figures. The operating cash flow increased over the 9 months by 12% or EUR 20.5 million up to EUR 187.1 million. If we compare these figures with the consensus in the market, then we see that in the single Q3 as well as in the 9 months, we reached or surpassed all figures. This applies to the revenues, EBITDA and EBIT, but in operating cash flow and operating earnings per share, we are above expectations, specifically operating cash flow, where we surpass the expectations by EUR 10 million. The operating EPS is now cumulative and in the single quarter, slightly above the consensus. If we have a look into the segments, we see what the growth on one hand side and the meteorological weakness compared to the extremely strong previous year what that means to our figures. In the solar park segment, the revenues increased from EUR 172 million previous year's 9 months to EUR 198 million this year. Here we do have a lack of revenues due to meteorological weakness compared to the very strong previous year of EUR 5 million, and at the other side, additional EUR 32 million of revenues from our new newly grid-connected Spanish parks. That can be seen on the EBITDA level and EBIT level as well. If we correct the EUR 5 million meteorological effect in the previous year, then the margins will stick at the same level. In the wind farms where we had not so important acquisitions in the last years, only Fjordcamp and Paltusmäki, adding some additional revenues. The reduction in the revenues as well in the EBITDA and in the EBIT is due to a negative meteorological effect of more than EUR 7 million. In the technical services, we see almost the same business, we see the same business activities as in previous years. We see heavily reduced EBITDA and EBIT, but this is due only to one effect. Last year, we disposed our Encavis Technical Services GmbH to our minority holding Stern Energy S.p.A and realized a EUR 1.9 million profit in the first half, and that cannot be repeated here. That is the reason why we have reduced profit here. Profitability itself is the same level without that effect than in previous the previous year's 9 months. The asset management had a very strong start into the year. After the 9 months, we realized EUR 11.3 million of revenues, which is 85% more revenues than the previous year. It quadrupled more than quadrupled the profits. The headquarters streamlined their cost and could reduce the cost, so the cost of the headquarters decreased from EUR 7.4 million to EUR 6.5 million. A very short look on the balance sheet, the growth in the company, which led to that 35% increase in revenues so far compared to previous year, is reflected in our balance sheet growth by 8%. What we do see here is the full connection to the grid, and with that, full consolidation of Talayuela. La Cabrera was already connected to the grid and therefore fully consolidated in the last year's report, 2020. The 8% growth is based on that full consolidation of Talayuela. With the profitability, we could increase our equity. If we then have a look into the guidance, the Executive Board had a look on the guidance. We balanced everything and confirmed the guidance. After 9 months, we can state that we realized already at this point of time, 80% and more of our guidance already. For some of the key figures, we are already 89%. We absolutely confirm our guidance and see currently no reason to deviate from it. The same applies to our respective segmentational report, although there might be some weakness maybe in wind, but this is something which have to be checked in the next one and a half month, which we cannot forecast by now. Ladies and gentlemen, that was my presentation on the figures. If you have now any question for that, I would like to hand over to our moderator. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we will begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star followed by 1 on their touch-tone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star followed by 2. If you're using speaker equipment today, please lift the handset before making your selection. Anyone who has a question may press star followed by 1 at this time. One moment for the first question, please. The first question is from the line of Jan Bauer from Warburg Research. Please go ahead. Good morning, and thank you for taking my question. I got one question regarding the Spanish PV parks. Can you tell us how high the merchant market sales for those 2 parks have been during the first 9 months? Dierk, will you take the question or shall I? Actually, on the exact figure, I mean, I can give the percentage-wise, but probably you are better on the if it is with regard to revenue, please take, you take that. Firstly, the La Cabrera park is unlike the Talayuela park, 75% hedged under long-term PPA contracts. In the La Cabrera park, the 25% are hedged under a 15-month hedge contract until end of March of next year. It is only Talayuela with 25 MW which is exposed to the spot market price, which as you might know, is quite favorable. Please have in mind that Talayuela had a ramp-up phase in January, February and March. That was not the full production we had in these days. In the summer months, we were pretty well off and it's EUR 3 million-EUR 4 million in total, which should be exposed to spot market prices. Mr. Bauer, honestly said, this is hard to figure because it depends on the spot market price was increasing within the 6 months, so it is an average pricing. Yeah. I just tried to figure that out. If I could add to that, Mr. Bauer. I mean, please bear with us that we are not individually giving any figures for our hedging positions in the market because this is also something which we do not want to disclose. Therefore, we stick to our hedging policy, which says on the overall portfolio, maximum 5% of our revenue on an annual basis calculated will be exposed to merchant prices. That is our guideline and risk policy. How we then hedge individually every asset in the country or on a portfolio perspective, that is nothing we would like to disclose to the market. Yeah, fair enough. For during Q4, can we expect that you will again spin off a minority share of one of your wind farms? Usually, as you said, as you might know, we are always disposing of participations in wind farms during the course of the year. As you know, this is mostly pretty backloaded in the year's end. Last year, we announced, I think, shortly before Christmas. We are confident that we will be able to give an announcement regarding a sale of a participation in a wind farm this year as well, but the other party has to sign as well and to approve, so we are absolutely positive and it runs very smoothly, but you never know. We are confident that we will reach it, and it is part of our guidance. Okay, perfect. Thank you. One last question regarding your Fast Forward 2025 strategy. I just ran through the figures, and I was asking myself, how high is the share of the asset management in your 2025 guidance? We know that. Do you- Sorry. Do you want to go ahead? No, please go ahead, Christoph. Asset management itself, we know that here we do have some. It's a very different business to our own business. Our own business here, we are accumulating parks and every new park, if it is well run. While the asset management enjoys one-off payments for the investment and then payments for the regular maintenance and operations of these parks. The major chunk is the one-off payment that we reach at the very beginning, and this has some limitation because the number of people working on the parks. Sorry, the number of works bringing in new funds, convincing investors and investing the parks. Therefore, the growth rate which we see currently in the asset management won't go forever. We see a slight increase in these figures based on the operating and asset management payments that we see from the funds as well. If you assume a slight increase in the future, then I think you have reflected it correctly in your calculations. Okay. Thank you very much. The next question is from the line of Peter Crampton from Barclays. Please go ahead. Good morning. Peter Crampton here from Barclays. Just one question, if I may. Now, we've already had SPD, Greens and FDP in their kind of exploratory paper on the negotiations for kind of this coalition government talk very aggressively about new energy policy and particularly kind of mentioning wanting to step up new onshore wind and solar capacity, new builds by easing planning laws. I was kind of wondering whether you see kind of, you know, opportunities, you know, here, and what would need to happen for you to maybe step up, you know, renewable build more in Germany in terms of whether this could be an exciting opportunity for Encavis. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. I'll take that question, Dierk Paskert. I mean, if the outcome is such as you just described, then definitely this would have positive effect for us, but that remains to be seen. We do not see so much use in just announcing new plans because that was already there with the older government. What has to be taken off, or really done in a different way, is what Christoph Husmann alluded to at the beginning of his call, that it's permitting and really granting permits, and that we have to expedite drastically in Germany in order to really catch up. We see a lot of demand from the energy markets and from the off-takers, so that is very high, not only in Germany, also in other countries. I would rather foresee that there is a lack of really good projects being built rather than a lack of demand. Therefore, permissioning and permitting the parks should be key priority to the governments more or less in all European countries. If that is, let's say, done by the new government in Germany, then definitely it would help us. Okay, perfect. Thank you for your answer. The next question is from the line of Igor Kim from Berenberg. Please go ahead. Yes. Hi, good morning. I've got 3 questions from my side. First one, on your last acquisition of 74 MW that you announced last week, could you give some color what revenue contribution we could expect when it's fully operational and also for the next year, if you can't give a precise figure, then at least maybe remuneration per megawatt-hours what we could expect here. Second question is, if I correctly understood, you still expect some acquisitions before the year end, if there will be no delay, of course, but as a base case scenario that we could expect some more megawatt takes before the end of the year. The 3rd question, with a pretty strong operating cash flow that you had in the first 9 months, don't you think that your guidance for the full year on operating cash flow is sort of conservative? Or could you give some color for the 4th quarter, what you expect here? Yeah, that's it so far. Thank you. Okay. Christoph, would you take the first one on expected- Yeah. revenue, I think. Yeah. The expected revenues will be a median, a one-digit million EUR figure derived from that park portfolio when they are all connected to the grid. Please have in mind, Mr. Kim, that there are 2 parks which are like the other ones already built but not connected to the grid yet. Since we already stated that commissioning in Europe are sometimes time-wise surprising, it could be that there is some delay just in the commissioning in the end. This would mean that they are not connected to the grid before year end. The remaining 2 ones they are already connected to the grid. This could mean that the overall revenues contribution in the next year will be, by that, somewhat lower. I would take the last question, Dierk, and then I give it over to you for the middle question. This is the operating cash flow, whether it is conservative or not. Well, Mr. Kim, I certainly would love to tell you that, but as a matter of fact, as we know that we have a capital gains tax repayment always, which is done by the tax authorities, and sometimes it comes within the year, and sometimes it is paid on the 3rd of January. Therefore, since the operating cash flow is different to revenues and others, depending on exact day. We cannot forecast it so exactly yet with the operating cash flow. As I stated, we already reached almost 90% of this year's figures. It could be higher, but there is some risk in it. We refrain from increasing that goal and stick with our above figure, which we stated. I'll take the second question. Yeah, on the megawatts to be expected. Also there, clearly no guidance until end of the year can be given now. However, there we have, let's say, definitely processes going on which we see at least as being able to at least sign them within the next 6 weeks, so until year-end, one of which will be dependent on permitting. Everything so far is done. We simply have to reach ready-to-build status. That is something we are waiting for. All signs we see currently is that the permission will be granted this year, but we can only announce once we have it in our hands. Quite easily, you can see that this is something coming from a bigger project, which would come from our development partnerships in Germany. A second one is more a acquisition of a already connected to the grid or under construction project, which we are currently exclusively negotiating. That is the second one. Those 2, we are pretty optimistic that they will come, but we can only announce it once they are done. Okay, thanks a lot. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Teresa Schinwald from Raiffeisen Bank International. Please go ahead. Yeah, good morning, and thanks for taking my questions. I have 3, one a bit more detailed one. There was an increase in other operating expenses in the 3rd quarter. Why has this been this way, and is this sustainable or can it be reversed? The second one concerns the confirmation of the operating EPS guidance, which was confirmed despite the higher number of shares. Is it fair to assume that the absolute bottom line guidance is now a bit higher? The last one, I would like actually to follow up on Peter's question. We have heard the same complaint about commissioning from a lot of infrastructure companies, be it energies, motorways, trains or you name it. At the same time, the private sector can certainly offer higher salaries to the qualified employees. Is there a solution to that when the public sector needs to match employment and staff to the massive infrastructure investment announced? Christoph, will you take the I would suggest that you take. Yeah, I have to look it up and start. You please start. Yeah. Okay, I'll start with the last question. I mean, if your question, I don't know whether I got it 100% right, but if it is also with regard to cost increases, which we see currently for infrastructure projects, not only in the renewables business but all over the space, that is definitely something we are also carefully watching out. It is not insignificant, I can tell you. We are talking about cost increase of double-digit percentage numbers for some components. However, so far, that is at least, let's say, compensated partially, if not all, with higher than expected megawatt hour prices in some of the markets. Therefore, we are quite confident that we can keep that. Is there further cost inflation to be expected through, let's say, more infrastructure projects? That is nothing we see at least long term will be staying in the market. Our expectation, and that is, I think, goes in line with most market participants, is that for 2022 it will be for EPCs still a relevant topic, very relevant topic, but then it will also melt away like we have seen, for instance, it currently also on supply, and the supply chain in the world where transport costs and so on, logistics costs have already come down significantly. Raw material prices did come down already significantly. We haven't seen the impact for the components yet, but I am absolutely sure that this will also come then later next year, so that we are back to normal by end of 2022. Regarding your- May I- Sorry. May I clarify my question? Yeah. It was rather about the timing issues. The strong demand from the infrastructure side. Okay, good. The lack of ability from the public sector. Yeah. to catch up with the pace. Yeah. Is there a solution to the problem? Yeah. The solution can only be given by, let's say, from the permitting side, because without permitting, we can't build and construct and connect. I mean, we have at least hopes because that problem is seen now from the authorities. However, it remains to be seen whether the administration really then catches up with that problem. We have some signs at least that this will be the case, but that is still to be done. For us, it is, let's say therefore, of utmost importance that we read the markets on the one hand from the offtaker side, as well as from the construction side in the right manner and match it. That is probably our, let's say, management expertise to do that. The ones who have, let's say, the best handling of these timing issues will probably be the ones who do the best projects. Because if you, let's say, scout out for projects when there is no offtake, that doesn't help you, and it's the other way around, it doesn't help you either. Therefore, matching those 2 things and getting the timing right is probably the management expertise in renewables business these days. We are quite confident that with our development partnerships, we are pretty much well placed to exactly really spot that timing issue. Thank you. Regarding your question on the other operating expenses. These other operating expenses are usually linked to the cost of the ordinary business of our parks. We had a reduction. We had a reduction of last year. Last year we had EUR 11.8 million this year and EUR 12.6 million last year. This is the operating part of that running part is linked to the new Spanish parks connected to the grid. Last year in the 3rd quarter, we had some small extra expenses with ramping up La Cabrera park, and we had additional costs last year in the 3rd quarter due to our filing against the Italian state for the retroactive feed-in tariff cut in 2015. This was some reduction we had here. Now your question regarding EPS, earnings per share. I didn't get the question correctly, what you are referring to. Could you please repeat the question? Yes. The operating EPS forecast of EUR 0.46 was left unchanged, although your number of shares increased within the 4th quarter. Yeah. there was a communication of a small negative impact, of course, of the higher number of shares. Is this actually a small increase in the absolute figure that you're communicating of the operating net income? Yes. In the end, it is. Otherwise, we couldn't compensate for it. Please have in mind that- Thank you. The calculation basis for the operating EPS is the average number of shares during the course of the year. With the conversion of the shares on October 4th, they are only reflected for October, November, December, so only with 1-4th in these calculations. That was the only otherwise, if you don't forget it, then you would have it. You'd use a higher impact on the net income, which we couldn't fulfill. Sure. Of course. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Emmanuel Chevalier from Crédit Mutuel - CIC. Please go ahead. Yes. Hello. Emmanuel Chevalier from Crédit Mutuel - CIC. Thank you for taking my question. I have only one on the feed-in tariff cut for solar in France. I have in mind that you have 2 parks potentially impacted for a total of 50 MW. Do you already have an estimation of the EBITDA losses for 2022, please? Well, we received... You know, there's an ongoing discussion on that. There is some law implemented, but that law is contradictory in itself. Firstly, there is some proposed cut in feed-in tariffs, but secondly, there are 2 additional thresholds which have to be fulfilled. One is that, firstly, the DSCR of the park should be above 1.0, so that the repayment of the debt is possible. Secondly, there is an accepted return on the level of the investor, and that is fulfilled by our parks. Therefore, it is debatable whether that proposed feed-in tariff cut applies to our parks. Okay, thank you. You're welcome. The next question is from the line of Martin Tessier from Stifel. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning. Thanks for the presentation. One question for me. You said that you expect a revenue contribution in the 1-digit million EUR range for the park in the Netherlands that you recently acquired. If I'm not mistaken, under the SDE+ mechanism, when spot prices are above the SDE+ price, the asset benefits from the upside. Could you just clarify whether the 1-digit million EUR amount is a floor or whether it already includes some merchant upside? Thanks. Christoph, will you take that? From my point of view, that very nice rule that you always enjoy the upside of higher spot market prices applies to German feed-in tariff system, but not to the Dutch. In the Netherlands, you have some smaller proportion. It's more like the Italian system, where you have some maybe additional adjustment, but not full contribution of the spot market price, unfortunately. This has positive and negative side effects. The SDE+ in the Netherlands is really a fixed rule. In the Netherlands, as you might be aware of, it is that the annual electricity production, the plant electricity production in the year is subsidized. If you have, and if you enjoy, like in the last 2 years, very nice summers in the Netherlands, then the additional electricity which goes beyond the plant kilowatt hour production has to be marketed by yourself, and then you enjoy the higher spot market price. There is an upside element in that Dutch system, but we never plan weather forecast, so we always assume plant energy production. Therefore, higher spot market prices are not yet reflected here, which are in the Netherlands, only due to better summers. Okay, thanks for the clarification. Thank you. You're welcome. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star followed by 1 on your telephone. There are no more questions at this time. I hand back to Dr. Christoph Husmann for closing comments. Yeah, thank you very much for dialing in. Thank you very much for your interest in our company. As you see, Encavis is progressing and developing like planned, although it looks sometimes compared to previous year with fantastic weather conditions to be sometimes a little bit negative deviation. In total, the company is developing on plan and therefore the Executive Board is very confident that we will reach our guidance like in the last years. Thank you very much for following us. Thank you very much for contacting us. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact us in the next days and weeks and, well, in the meantime, please stay safe and healthy. Thank you very much and have a good day. Thank you also from my side. Bye.