Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Fraport AG Interim Figures Q1 3 Months 2024 Conference Call and Live Webcast. I'm Moritz, the Chorus C all operator. I would like to remind you that all participants will be in a listen-only mode and the conference is being recorded. The presentation will be followed by a question-and-answer session. You can register for questions at any time by pressing star and one on your telephone. For operator assistance, please press star and zero. The conference must not be recorded for publication or broadcast. At this time, it's my pleasure to hand over to Florian Fuchs, VP Investor Relations. Please go ahead, sir. Yeah, thank you, Moritz, and a warm welcome also from my side. All documents for this presentation were released this morning, 7:00 A.M. CET. Now it's time for the management presentation. The presentation will be held by Matthias Zieschang, our CFO, and afterwards there's a Q&A session. We kindly ask you to limit your question to a maximum of three so that everyone will have the opportunity to raise some questions. As always, do take note of all the cautionary language at the disclaimer. And with that, I'd like to hand over to Matthias to start with the presentation, please. Yeah, thank you very much. Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, also from my side. Let me start my presentation today with a closer look at our traffic performance at the Frankfurt site in the first 4 months of fiscal year 2024. On slide number 3, you see on the one side the reported passenger development and on the other side the underlying passenger development. As you know, we were meaningfully impacted by strikes in the past quarter, which were carried out by Lufthansa unions and the ver.di union for the passenger screening business in Germany. As a result, we lost about 500,000 passengers due to strikes and another 100,000 passengers because of a 1-day closure for bad weather in January. Please note that the before-mentioned numbers adjust the direct impact without any passengers that we lost due to the uncertainty around the strike situation and didn't book their flights from or via Frankfurt. Correspondingly, we reported a recovery rate of just 84%-85% for Frankfurt Airport in the first four months. Adjusted for the strike and weather-related cancellations, the recovery rate would have been some three percentage points higher at 87%-88%. As painful as the cancellations were, the good information is that most of the union disputes have been settled now, and we can look forward to a more or less straightforward summer season. On a full-year basis, we have meanwhile exceeded the previous year by some 1.4 million passengers. When considering that last year we handled about 59.4 million passengers, this means that we already achieved the lower end of our full-year guidance without any further growth from here on, which is not our base assumption and also not realistic. Having said this, we are well on track to be at about the midpoint of our traffic guidance for this year. Moving on to my next slide, on number four, you see the development of our international portfolio. Fraport Greece and Fraport Antalya continued a positive trend in the first four months of the year. While the recovery rate in Greece exceeded Q1 2019 by 9%, also April showed a good momentum at 14%. Antalya Airport showed a passenger growth of 17% in Q1 and 12% in April, respectively. It's equally encouraging to see that Lima Airport is joining Antalya and Greece when it comes to the outperformance against 2019. At 104% in Q1 and 102% in April, Lima Airport is showing a very solid development year to date, and it's catching up on the lost performance due to the political unrest situation in the last year. A more than 100%, at more than 100%, our Twin Star investment also looks strong in Q1 but is likely to come down over the summer season, as you can already see in the April figure. Here, the flights banned to Russia and the proximity to Ukraine continue to weigh on the traffic recovery. Brazil and Ljubljana are still below the 2019 level. While Ljubljana continues to miss a national flag carrier, Fraport Brasil suffers in Fortaleza from capacity reductions by GOL Airlines, which filed for Chapter 11 in the past quarter. At Porto Alegre Airport, you will have noticed that southern Brazil is currently experiencing the worst flooding the region has ever seen in its history. Many people have lost their lives. Our thoughts are therefore with the victims, their friends, and relatives. Porto Alegre Airport has also been affected. Due to the rising waters, the airport operations have currently been suspended. Please note that at this point of time, we cannot provide a precise guidance about the damages incurred or the economic impact of the airport's closure. It is, however, clear to us that the severe weather conditions will form a Force Majeure event under the concession contract, and we have good coverage due to our insurance contract. We are currently assessing the situation with our colleagues in Brazil to see how we can provide support and restore operations as soon as possible. Moving on to our key financial highlights of the past quarter on slide number 5. Ladies and gentlemen, the past quarter marked another turning point. It's the first time post-COVID that we recorded a positive group result in the starting quarter of a year. At EUR 890 million, group revenues exceeded the previous year by 16% or 17% when adjusted for IFRIC 12. Key drivers for the increase in revenues were the traffic recovery in Frankfurt and internationally, as well as higher airport charges. Positively impacted by a EUR 28 million compensation for COVID-related effects at our Fraport Greece investment, EBITDA achieved an all-time high result in the first quarter of a year and exceeded EUR 210 million. Due to higher EBITDA, EBIT on the other side was slightly short of the 2019 value by EUR 3 million. Still at EUR 83 million, our Q1 EBIT almost doubled compared to the previous year value. Within our financial result, higher interest income compensated for the increase in interest expenses. Simultaneously, our Antalya investment recorded an improving result. Correspondingly, our group result turned positive again and reached EUR 30 million in the past quarter. Turning the page to our cash flow and indebtedness situation on slide 6. Overall, the operating cash flow and capital expenditure developed in line with our expectations. Reflecting the positive traffic and financial result developments, the operating cash flow was clearly up compared to the previous year and also exceeded the value of Q1 2019. At EUR 162 million, the operating cash flow would have also been sufficient to achieve a free cash flow break-even without considering the expansion CapEx in Frankfurt and at Lima Airport, a very strong result. Including the expansion CapEx, free cash flow was negative at -EUR 226 million. As a result, our group net debt increased to EUR 8 billion at the end of the first quarter. Despite the higher net debt, our net debt-to-last 12 months EBITDA leverage ratio improved due to the operational result from 6.6x to 6.4x. Moving on to our repayment profile at the end of Q1, I'm now on slide number 7. Despite the negative free cash flow, our liquidity position remained at the high level of more than EUR 4 billion, of EUR 5 billion, respectively, including unused project finance and committed credit lines. Gross debt, on the other side, grew to slightly more than EUR 12.1 billion. The increase in gross debt also reflects the project finance at Lima Airport, where we have meanwhile made use of close to EUR 750 million. The unused project finance in Lima still amounts to more than EUR 410 million. As a result of the continued refinance and Lima drawdowns, our average cost of debt increased slightly to 3.1% at the end of Q1. On the other side, our available funds also reflected an increased profitability. While we started last year with an average yield in Frankfurt of about 0.8%, we are now standing at an average yield of about 2.8%. Looking ahead, we expect the yield to steadily increase to about 3% by 8 by end of H1, which will help us to reduce our cost of carry. Coming to our developments, starting, as always, with aviation on slide 8. While we just handled 85% of our pre-COVID passenger number, the aviation charges exceeded the 2019 level by EUR 20 million in the past quarter and reached EUR 195 million. As a result, we dropped the 2019 comparison in our reporting, which also marks that we have left the pandemic behind. In addition to the traffic recovery, the increase in airport charges became visible, so +9.5% from January 1st onward. Despite the absence of the positive one-off effect from the first-time at- equity accounting of our security business in the past year, EBITDA grew strongly by EUR 16 million, mainly due to the higher airport charges. While D&A increased, segment EBIT remained clearly positive as well at EUR 17 million. All in all, a very good start of our aviation segment in the first quarter of the year. Moving on to our retail and real estate segment on slide number 9. Revenues also in this segment exceeded the 2019 benchmark year. At EUR 119 million, revenues were 10% higher compared to the previous year and 2% above the value of 2019. The revenue growth was mainly driven by the real estate division as well as by a continuous improvement in parking revenues per passenger. Regarding our retail activities, the picture remains mixed. While shopping and service revenues were higher than 2019 on a per-passenger basis, advertising revenues continued to dilute the commercial revenues per passenger compared to 2019. We also show the relevant figures on slide number 10. Regarding advertisement, despite a negative performance compared to 2019, we are seeing an improving trend compared to the previous year. In absolute terms, advertising revenues grew by roughly EUR 1 million compared to last year or by 15%. With the increasing share of Far East passengers but also the European Football Championship, we are confident to see further progress in advertisement over the course of the year, which will help us in our retail revenue per passenger key performance indicator. Regarding the segment EBITDA, we still recorded temporary headwinds from elevated costs from maintenance during the Q1 winter season. Despite the higher OPEX, EBITDA showed a good improvement compared to last year at EUR 83 million. EBITDA grew by close to 5%. Moving on to our ground handling segment on slide number 11. Despite increasing OPEX from a higher staff amount and collective labor agreement effects, ground handling showed a slight improvement in second EBITDA in segment EBITDA. At revenue of EUR 160 million, the traffic volume, however, was still too low in the off-season quarter to cover the labor costs arising from permanent and temporary staff. Correspondingly, EBITDA remained negative at minus EUR 20 million in Q1. Looking ahead, we expect better cost coverage from the increase in passenger numbers for the remainder of the year as well as from the reduction of temporary staff from external contractors. Our final segment, international activities and services, is shown on slide 12. The international segment continued its outperformance. Revenues, EBITDA, and EBIT stood well above the previous year and pre-crisis level. Regarding the EBITDA, you will have noticed that we recorded the EUR 28 million COVID compensation at Fraport Greece entirely in Q1. Having said this, there is no further compensation effect in the upcoming quarters at Fraport Greece. Even when adjusting for the EUR 28 million one-off item, the international segment stood above the previous year and pre-COVID levels. Key driver for the improvement in results was our Lima investment, which grew revenues by EUR 12 million and EBITDA by EUR 4 million. All in all, we are very satisfied with the performance of the segment at the beginning of the year. Coming to my last slide for today's presentation, our outlook, I'm on slide 30. Following the development of the first three months, we left the guidance ranges unchanged. For Frankfurt Airport, the midpoint of the expectations remains at 63 million passengers with a guidance range of 61-65 million passengers. Equally, on the level of EBITDA here, the midpoint remains slightly above EUR 1.3 billion in the range from EUR 1.26 billion-EUR 1.36 billion. Consequently, the group net result range also remained unchanged between EUR 435 million and EUR 530 million, while the net debt-to-EBITDA expectation stays at about 6.4 times. Having said this, ladies and gentlemen, I'd like to thank you for your attention, and we can now open the Q&A session. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touch-tone telephone. You will hear a tone to confirm that you have entered the queue. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star followed by two. Participants are requested to use only handsets while asking a question. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. One moment for the first question, please. The first question comes from Carlos Caburassi Ortega from Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Hi, Matthias. Hi, Florian. Thank you for the presentation and for taking my questions. I will limit to three, as you mentioned. The first one is on Porto Alegre. As Matthias just mentioned, the airport has been closed for a few days now, and it's difficult to provide a precise guidance. But could you explain a bit more about the situation? How is the airport and the area as of today? And additionally, could we see a one-off coming from here, and if so, up to how much? The second question is on the regulated activities. Basically, could you provide your views in terms of the regulator, the return on Fraport assets for 2024 and 2025, and what are your expectations in terms of aeronautical charges for the second half of the decade? And my last question is on Fraport USA. While sales have increased, the rest of the P&L has performed worse. What explains that performance, and what should we expect for full year 2024 and for the future? Thank you. Yeah, coming to your first question, Porto Alegre. So the situation is that everything is flooded. So in the terminals and also on the runways, the water has a height of about 50 centimeters. So all the operations have been stopped. And now we are waiting that the water is going out again from the area as well as from the city and then to see what are the damages and to reopen the airport. Regarding the damages, again, as of today, it's too early to have an assessment. But I assume your question is, what could be the financial output of this damage? Here we have to say, first of all, we have an insurance covering all these damages. Second, we declared force majeure to the government based on the clause in our concession agreement, and this is accepted. In other words, then we have, in addition to the insurance coverage, we have this so-called economic equilibrium element or clause in the contract. This means if we have unexpected effects like this flood there, that this will be compensated by economic mechanisms by the government, for example, higher fees in the following years or another compensation. At the end of the day, our expectation is that, of course, there will be damages in a form that we have to do something on the infrastructure side. Also, there's a lack of revenues, but our today's assumption is that all these damages are covered by the insurance/by this economic equilibrium clause in the concession agreement. Second question, regulatory activities. I assume you mentioned the fees for Frankfurt. Is it correct? Yes. Yes, correct. For this year, everything is gone. So up from the 1st of January, we have this increase of 9.5%. Will it until the end of the year? We are now in the middle of the phase for the regulatory period 2025. We always address that inflation is there. Inflation means primarily also the high wage agreements, which hit us in our P&L. Therefore, it's absolutely clear and necessary that we must have a compensation on the fee side for these inflationary elements. And this means there's no final number in the market, but there will be, again, a single-digit, relatively high fee increase, which come as a proposal from us to the regulator in the next couple of weeks. Okay. About for the second half of the decade, would you expect to keep increasing tariffs sequentially? Yeah. But again, this proposal is valid for the full year 2025, beginning from the 1st of January 2025, ending on the 31st of December 2025 for one year. Okay. Perfect. Third question, USA. So this is in line with our expectation plans. We won the new concession for Washington. And of course, there are some startup costs so that you cannot see it's not fully reflected now in the P&L. Let me say the final and sustainable effect from this new concession. But all in all, everything is running in line with our plan and our expectation, and you will see some better numbers in the following quarters. Okay. Thank you. Welcome. And the next question comes from Élodie Rall from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Yes. We can hear you, Élodie. It seems like Élodie just got disconnected by accident. We will continue with the next question, which comes from Sathish Sivakumar from Citi. Please go ahead. Yeah. I got three questions. Thanks again for the presentation here. So first, on the strike resolution, obviously, Matthias Zieschang had settled wages, wage deal with both pilots as well as the ground handling. And what are you actually seeing into quarter two? Have you managed to get those lost customers who eventually not ended up booking at Frankfurt in Q1? So are you seeing the spillover impact carrying over into quarter two as well, or is it kind of back to normal in terms of your expectation on traffic as we go into May? And then the second one is around the retail spend. Can you share, obviously, Easter was in March when that it had actually an impact. But where are we on April retail spend for PAX? How does it compare vs, say, Q1 as such? Have you seen the Easter impact unwind, and you actually benefited better in April? So that's my second one. And the third one is around the you got EUR 2 billion of debt up for in the next two years. What's the plan around, say, refinancing those debts? Yeah. Thank you. Starting with your first question, the strike effects. So first of all, regarding the passenger numbers, we addressed in our presentation the number of 600,000 in the first quarter. But as I mentioned, this is a direct impact. So what we could measure directly on these days where the strikes have been, you know that in reality, these strike threats or discussions about a potential strike, they started some days before. And you can always see this phenomenon when there's a discussion about a potential strike that already at that point of time, the booking numbers as well as the realized passenger numbers are going down. So this is very difficult to measure what is the outcome of these indirect effects. But I would say that the indirect effects at minimum have the same volume like the direct impact. So it's just to get a feeling what a strike costs us also measured in passenger numbers. Now looking forward, this is also what I mentioned. Most of these contracts are now closed. We do not expect new hassle in the next couple of months, not days, but in the next quarters for the rest of the year. We think everything is through now. So that, looking forward, we don't expect any significant impacts from new and unexpected strikes here for Frankfurt Airport. Regarding the retail numbers, so not just retail, but also parking, etc. On a first view, the numbers are not so surprisingly positive, so to say. But you have to see that there wasn't so far a change or structural change when you compare the current numbers with the previous year. Why? Because in the previous year, the Easter holidays have been in April and now in March. Easter holidays have a significant impact on all the numbers. Why? Because during the Easter holidays, you have strong outbound traffic flying out of Frankfurt, flying to Greece, to other destinations. And then you have the phenomenon that from the outbound perspective, this is always good, and you could see good numbers in the aviation segment. But for the incoming traffic, for example, in Greece, you see a lot of passengers, but you just receive the fees when they are restarting and flying back to home. And this happened then in April. So there is now in a comparison to the previous months, you see a relatively weak March outside Frankfurt, and you will see a relatively strong positive effect in March. This is related to Greece, to all these companies in our international portfolio. On the parking side, you have a different phenomenon. So parking is paid when you come back and take your car and then to pay for the days when your car's in the car park. Now you have the phenomenon, end of March, a lot of people came with the cars, and the parking houses are full, and then they are going to leave the parking houses in April. The revenues, the strong impact from parking revenues, you see then in April. This is just to explain the numbers, March, which you see, and April, which will come in Q2. Now looking on the retail numbers in April, which today are available for us, and here we have, let me say, a good signal for us and also for you in a way that when we just look on April, we are EUR 0.24 in the spend per PAX higher than previous year. If you look in the single items like shopping, like advertisement, like services, you also can see that now up from April, the item advertisement is picking up. So for example, in April, we had in the previous April month in 2023, we had EUR 1.9 million revenues. And in this month now, we have EUR 1 million more. So it's more than a 30% increase. And this gives us a confidence that now the numbers are going up. And in April itself, we have a good outperformance of the previous year and also accumulated. It's an increase so that what we already said that during the course of the year, now we expect even better spend per passenger number driven by an increase on the retail side as well as on the advertisement side. And third question. 25. 25. Yeah. When you look on our liquidity with EUR 4.1 billion, this is a huge liquidity, but in the moment, it's good to have it. Also, as I mentioned, as of today, the interest rate on our liquidity side, it's 3%. And this is absolutely matching the cost of debt, which we have. And it can be that end of Q2, it's even a little bit above 3%. So with other words, we don't have any cost of carry in the moment, and we have the protection from the liquidity. Nevertheless, looking forward, we are going to bring it down a little bit over the time, not in a significant step down. It doesn't make sense because we are given the inverse interest curve. We are benefiting from our liquidity, which is deposited on 3, 6 months, 12 months duration, while our indebtedness has a much longer duration. So to say, we are benefiting from the inverse interest rate curve. That's the reason why our ambition to bring it down is there, but we will do it in soft steps. And we are not going to. Your question is there will be not a full refinancing of the payback situation. Wonderful. Thanks, Matthias. That's quite helpful. Thank you. And the next question comes from Elodie Rall from J.P. Morgan. Please go ahead. Hi. Sorry about earlier. Thanks for taking me again. I hope it wasn't asked. But first of all, on free cash flow, we delivered negative minus EUR 226 million in Q1. It's in line with what you did, I think, more or less from Q1 last year. So does it mean that for 2024, you expect to be rather towards the bottom end of your guidance of the range, so towards more like -EUR 660 million for 2024, and you still expect to be breakeven in 2025? That's my first question. My second question is related to that. Would be an update on CapEx for 2024 and 2025. I think you had said EUR 1.4 billion and EUR 1.1 billion at the full year call, but it would be good if you could confirm that or if there's any change. Lastly, on ground handling, okay, still negative in Q1 because of the low traffic level, and you're still guiding for breakeven for the year. But what kind of traffic level do you actually need to see to get there? Do you get there with the bottom end of your traffic guidance, do you think? Thank you. Yeah. Thank you for your questions. First topic was free cash flow. In our presentation on slide number 19, we gave the guidance for this year. When you look on the parameters, I think some parameters are more or less given, and some have more flexibility. I think on the EBITDA side, you will not see any surprise. So this will be a good number. As always, we try to be on the upper end of the range. Regarding the other side, when you look on the CapEx range, EUR 1.4 billion-EUR 1.5 billion, first of all, we think that this is exactly our range, but it is very difficult today. Even in November, it will be difficult to define whether it will be the lower or the upper end because you always have the phenomenon that in December, you have always a situation that the construction companies try to send as many as possible bills to you, and then we have to look whether it's valid or not. And so it's really in the last days of December, then we really can identify whether it's EUR 1.5 billion or EUR 1.4 billion. So this is very difficult to predict exactly, but no surprise regarding the range. Regarding the interest numbers, also, you don't see any variance or high volatility because even if the interest rate curve is shifting or changing, this has no significant impact on the financial result. So with other words, at the end of the day, the final level of CapEx defines where we end up regarding our free cash flow range, and we will stay in this range. Again, end of December, we know whether it will be the higher or the lower end of the free cash flow range. Then your question regarding CapEx guidance for 2024. So again, there's a reconfirmation of the guidance for 2024 as well as for 2025, so the EUR 1.1 billion next year. And this means that we stick to the free cash flow break even in next year, which is our absolute target, and we are convinced to achieve this. ground handling. Yeah. Ground handling is negative. Looking forward, it must be better, and it will be better. Here we have two drivers which will bring us in the right direction. One thing is, of course, that in Q2 and especially in Q3, we have a given cost structure. But on the other side, we have much higher revenues in the central infrastructure as well regarding the ramp and passenger services, so more revenue, traffic-driven. Second, we have to stabilize the operation. We have our own staff, and we also have in the moment about 800, even a little bit more than 800 persons from service contractors, so-called helping hands with a relatively low productivity but high cost. So this is a problem on our cost side, but we still use these guys to stabilize the operation, but with a clear target to bring these numbers down and to give you some feeling. So we always in the future, even before COVID, we worked with such guys, but we had in 2017, 2018, 2019, we had always a base level of about 150 persons from contracting firms. And now we are at a level of more than 800, and we have to bring it down because this costs us a lot of money. And this is a second lever now, step by step, to bring down this third-party personnel. And this will help us on the cost side. So we have two levers. Again, this is the traffic, which comes automatically on the revenue side. And on the other side, reduction of this personnel from contracting companies. Okay. Thanks very much. Welcome. And the next question comes from Ruxandra Haradau-Döser from HSBC. Please go ahead. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. First, could you please help understand the medium-term potential of Lima Airport? How shall we think about tariffs given the significant investments over recent years and about the traffic once capacities are expanded? And what will happen with the old terminal? Will it be closed? And second, I understand that some airlines like Aeroméxico would like to fly to Frankfurt, but they do not receive convenient slots. Could you please remind us how many slots per hour are currently open, and what will happen once T3 will be finalized in terms of available slots? Thank you very much. Yeah. Mrs. Haradau-D ö ser, thank you very much for your questions. First of all, Lima, starting with the terminal. So the plan is that we are going to inaugurate the new midfield terminal on the 18th of December with a big celebration with the president and all the politicians there. We are convinced that this will happen. So at the same day, we are going to close the old terminal. So we concentrate the operation on this large and new midfield terminal. Then we have to see what, as of today, there is no plan what to do with the old one. There are different plans which are now assessed. One thing is to have a commercial use for a shopping center. This could be one alternative, but also for other, for cargo things. So in other words, we are elaborating what alternative will bring us the highest financial contribution. One thing could be to start with a shopping center. But again, this is an open topic. And regarding the operational performance, also regarding your question regarding the fees. So first of all, when you look now on the traffic numbers, they are very positive. So this political difficult situation in the last two years, they could be overcome. And now we are back to normality. The numbers are above 2019, and we expect now a continuous growth like in the past, very solid single-digit growth rates in Lima. And this will be combined with significantly higher fees. So the first step is planned after this is linked to the inauguration. So that's also one reason why we have been so speedy, so to say, with the opening on the 18th because based on these assumptions, we can realize a good fee step up in 2025. And in principle, there will be a big one due to the CapEx. In principle, the fee increase is linked to the inflation rate minus X, and minus X stands for so-called productivity factor. So if, for example, inflation would be 5% or 6%, then we are taking or the regulator takes a 5% or 6% and deducts 1%, 1.5% for a requested productivity factor. So this is a normal adjustment mechanism for Lima. Regarding these now switching over to Frankfurt, yeah, with the slots, we have currently in the peaks about 100 movements per hour, but just in the peaks. So the traffic is still relatively or very unbalanced in Frankfurt. We have steep peaks, but we have also deep valleys. Of course, it's better to fill up the valleys. That's the reason why we are relatively reluctant to open our artificial constraint regarding the movements. What does it mean, artificial constraints? This means that theoretically, we have an available capacity of 126 movements per hour, but we are not going to open this because, first of all, the traffic is far away from the maximum given capacity. And again, we are relatively slowly opening these constraints to avoid overpeaking and given an incentive, so to say, for airlines to fly into the valleys because this is much better for productivity and an equal and balanced use of our infrastructure. And regarding this, what was it? Aeroméxico. I don't know the example, but I assume this has to do that they requested a slot in a peak time where we say peak time is full, but we offer you a lot of available slots in the valleys. And perhaps there's a discussion between us, but I don't know the case in the moment. But in principle, we have enough available slots, but not in these 3, 4 peaks during the day. And we don't want to open these constraints during the peak times to achieve a more balanced utilization of our infrastructure. Thank you. Welcome. And the next question comes from Patrick Creuset from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Hi, Matthias. Sorry. Just coming back to your earlier comments on the 2025 fee increases and your early expectations there. I think you mentioned here on the call, you saw that in the single digits, but relatively high. Does that mean high single digit? Well, what do you mean with let me say, last year, we came with 9.5%. So it will not, again, be 9.5%, but it will not far away from this number. Perhaps this gives you more confidence about the potential range of fee increases in 2025. Second question, you're around EUR 8 billion, above EUR 8 billion of net debt in March, and you're guiding EUR 8.2 billion-EUR 8.4 billion for the year. If we then think about second-half cash flow, which naturally tends to be a little bit better in your business, would it be fair to expect peak net debt somewhere around the half-year? No, because when you look on the indebtedness curve during the year in the previous years, you always see that of course, this is driven by CapEx. But regardless of this, when you look on the free cash flow in Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, you see always that in Q2 is always better than Q1. In Q3, we have an overflow, but in Q4, we have, in most cases, a negative number driven by the CapEx. CapEx is still strong this year because, as I mentioned on the 18th of December, Lima opening. So there's much huge outflow for Lima as well as for T3 to open with the beginning of the summer by schedule in 2026. So what I can reconfirm is we have this range, EUR 8.2-EUR 8.4. It will be as of today, or I would say that in Q3, the indebtedness is lower than in Q4. This must be the normal curve, so to say, regarding indebtedness. But then, of course, yeah, you will see in Q1 2025 another peak because Q1 is always the weakest quarter in the year. But then normally in Q2, break even or even a positive free cash flow because then CapEx will go down on one side, and we have further EBITDA increase on the other side. Got it. Thanks very much. The next question comes from Andrew Lobbenberg from Barclays. Please go ahead. Hi there. Can I come back to ground handling? I think in the past, you used to speak of an opportunity to improve the profitability by increasing the rates of handling contracts and walking away from contracts where you're not able to put the pricing up. Has that happened? Has that played out, or is that no longer the strategy? Then staying on handling, can you please remind us when the Lufthansa contract comes to an end and what your thinking is, what the potential pricing might be as that gets renegotiated? Then just the final last question, and perhaps a bit simple or basic, you spoke of high maintenance costs impacting the retail sector, but you didn't call it out in the context of the aviation sector. I'm just wondering why maintenance was such a burden on one part of the terminal and not the others. Thanks. Yeah. Starting with your first question regarding ground handling, so on the price side, in ground handling, we have the two subsegments. On one side, the passenger and ramp services, and on the other side, the central infrastructure. When we talk about problems, we always talk about ramp and passenger services because the central infrastructure is semi-regulated. You can also see and read in our presentation that parallel to the aviation fees, we also increase the prices for the central infrastructure with 9.5% up from the 1st of January. So this is fine. Here we are covering our cost as well as our cost of capital. So the problem comes from ramp and passenger services where we have a high personnel intensity on one side and wage contracts which are, at the end of the day, double-digit. And on the other side, we have other airlines as customers, and we have the Lufthansa. Regarding the contracts with other customers, these contracts have a short duration. So whenever a contract ends, we have the chance to renegotiate. And here we follow our principle that what we see on the wage side must be passed through on the price side. And this works well. So in other words, in the meantime, all the contracts with other airlines have been renegotiated, and we have significantly higher prices. Our problem is our biggest customer. This is Lufthansa with a market share of two-thirds. And here we signed a contract in 2019 with a period till 2026. At that point of time, we thought it's a good contract. Why? Because it's a long-lasting contract. In this contract, there is an annual price escalation of 2.3%. At that point of time, this equaled the price increase as well as the anticipated and expected inflation rate. Now we have the situation that the wages are going up, and we have these contracts. We are in ongoing negotiations with Lufthansa to open the contract, but you know the sentence, "Pacta sunt servanda." It needs two to tango, and there is, in the moment, an unwillingness of Lufthansa to talk about the prices in this contract. This is our problem, to open these contracts before 2026. We have two scenarios. One is a reopening of the contract with a lower probability. The second is that we have to stick to the contract as signed. This means that we have just 2.3% price increase per annum, but then, of course, a significant price increase in 2026. And in the meantime, all the homework on the cost side and productivity side has to be realized. Yeah. So refurbishment, maintenance. Yeah. What we have in Terminal 1, Concourse B, since years, we have closed the food court on the second floor, which is a huge food court. And we had to close it, yeah, to bring up the fire protection on the latest technology level. And this is very time-intensive as well as cost-intensive. And especially refurbishment for this is driving the maintenance cost in retail and also the things what we are now doing to reallocate the security lines in Terminal 1, Concourse A. This shift or reallocation to the north to gain more retail space. And the price, therefore, is higher maintenance and cost for this segment. Super. Thank you. Welcome. And the next question comes from José Arroyas. Please go ahead. Yes. Good afternoon. 3, please. First one on Lima. New terminal and runway will be handed over very soon. Can you please update us on the duration of the concession? Will the concession expire in 2041 or in 2051? The second question is on the private security employees in Frankfurt. There is a new labor agreement that has been agreed, and the wages are in the region of 30%-15% in terms of salaries. I'm aware that this is a pass-through for Frankfurt Airport, but I was wondering if there is any cohort of your employees that may be impacted by this salary agreement. I just want to double-check that. And lastly, on strategy, is there any non-core operation that Fraport may consider selling, and is there any plan that we may expect? Thank you. First of all, difficult to understand you. This has not to do with you, but with the quality of the line. So I try to interpret what have been your questions. So first question was, I think, Lima, duration of the contract. Lima, duration of the contract, it's till 2041 plus a 10-year option without any financial contribution from our side. So at the end of the day, it will run till 2051. Security contract, the higher wages. Yeah. Security contract, I assume you mentioned the s ecurity contract for Frankfurt. Is it correct? Yes, it is. Yes. Thank you. Yeah. This is a 100% pass-through. So at the end of the day, we have to see what are the costs for doing the security business, and 100% of this cost is charged to the airline. So there is no margin, but also no deficit or loss for us. It's neutral. It's just blowing up the P&L. And strategy regarding our portfolio, I assume this was your third question or my interpretation of this question. Here in our existing portfolio, we just have one asset which you can define as a non-core asset. This is the 10% participation in New Delhi. And here with the clear intention to sell it, and we are in long-lasting discussions with GMR. And let me say, there is some chance and some probability that we can realize the sale in this year, but this is not part of our guide. So if this would come, there is some probability that it could happen in 2024, then this would come on top of all numbers which you know from us. I hope I have cover ed all your questions. And the next question comes from Harishankar Ramamoorthy from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi. Good afternoon, everyone. Thanks for taking my questions. This is Hari from Deutsche Bank. Three from my side. If we look at the traffic for the first quarter against 2019, we did have, so to speak, a favorable base effect, right? You were down close to 23% last year. So that hopefully has helped with year-on-year performance for this Q1 2024. But would it be fair to assume that going forward, the growth on a YoY basis tapers off? Secondly, when we look at the aviation segment and look at the personnel costs, on a per-employee basis, they seem to be coming off on a YOY basis. Am I missing something there in terms of any timing impact? And lastly, if we take a step back and look at the 2030 EBITDA targets that you've set for yourselves, around EUR 2 billion, of which around 55%-60% comes from Frankfurt operations, that implies around 8% compounding. And if I remember right, you said it was going to be mostly linear. So just wanted to see if you had any further clarity on the building blocks in terms of how much we could expect from retail and so on and so forth. But even if not to that granularity, maybe your thoughts around how much would be passenger-driven and how much would be profitability per PAX, that would be very helpful. Thanks. Yeah. Thanks for your question. Traffic performance in Frankfurt. So it's not very strong what we saw in Q1, but this is not a surprise because this has to do with the constraints on the supply side coming primarily from Lufthansa, given the problems with personnel, given the problems with the delivery of the Dreamliner as well as the 777. And on top, then you have the problems with the engines for the A320. So this will constrain us from the supply side in 2024 as well as in 2025. And that's the reason why we are underperforming compared to other hubs in the world. So it comes from the supply side. Nevertheless, it's okay because we follow our financial targets. Second, also, thing which I would like to bring in the discussion, of course, is a mix between leisure traffic on one side and business traffic on the other side. So here we have now a situation that business traffic is between 60%-65%. This is what we forecasted last two, three years, saying that the new normal regarding business traffic is lower than compared to the pre-COVID level. And it's exactly how we saw the situation, in opposite to the much more optimistic view of the airlines. So it's exactly this what we saw in our conservative plans. But on the other side, therefore, you see a very vital flying behavior of leisure passengers where we, in the meantime, are above 100%. But the mix is so that we now have 84%-85% and a further improvement in next year, but still a limitation from the supply side in Frankfurt. In aviation segment, the personnel cost, let me say, it's determined by the tariff agreement and the so-called TVöD, which is valid for all civil servants in Germany. So more than 3 million people here. And we have to follow this contract, which is a very complex one, and having a lot of one-off payments starting in the last year with the inflation payment. And then what was it? EUR 320 per month. Help me, Mr. Fuchs. Yeah. Inflation adjustment was. Inflation adjustment, all one-offs until also running into this year and up from March, then we have this percentage increase of, I think, 5.5% plus some elements. So it's a very difficult complex. In other words, in the first quarter, but not just in aviation, everywhere, is characterized by two months with fixed installments. In March, it's a EUR 200 step up plus 5.5%. So in other words, up from Q2, the personal cost will be higher because then it kicks in the 5.5% tariff increase, but not just in aviation, but also in the other segments. Regarding the 2030 target, so the EUR 2 billion EBITDA as well as a EUR 1 billion free cash flow, so we gave a rough guess how the allocation could be more or less 50/50. Then your question is, what is traffic-driven and what is price-driven? My clear answer is, I don't know what is price-driven. We said it's a mechanism that if and when the traffic is higher than this, what we anticipated and have in our financial plans, then, of course, there will be a compensating effect on the price side, which we have to do because otherwise, we would realize excess returns, which is not allowed. So the adjustment mechanism is always the price. So when the traffic is better, price escalation will be lower and vice versa. So if and when the traffic ramp-up would be lower than what we have in our long-term planning to 2030, then we are more aggressive, so to say, on the price side to compensate the traffic. So the good thing for you, it doesn't matter whether it comes more from traffic or more from price. It's a combination of both because revenue is driven by price times volume. And last question, yeah, again, it will be a more linear ramp-up from now to 2030. Understood. That's helpful. Thanks a lot. Welcome. And the next question comes from Graham Hunt from Jefferies. Please go ahead. Graham, can you hear us? Yes. Now his line is on. I'm sorry. Now you can hear me? Yeah. Yeah. Okay. Perfect. Just two quick questions from me. One on the free cash flow bridge. If you could give any color on the EUR 93 million of other CapEx in Frankfurt, sort of if there were any one-offs, or if that's a normalized rate for the year, just trying to understand what that could be for 2024 as part of the broader CapEx spend. And then second question on retail. Would you be able to comment on how the mix has changed within the retail segment between lower-value sort of food and bev operators and higher-value retail operators? Has that changed materially over the past few quarters or years and where we stand today? And do you think that's going to change, or do we really just have to wait for Terminal 3 to open for that to change going forward? Thanks. Yeah. First question, CapEx-driven. So what we have in the full-year guidance for Frankfurt, this up to EUR 350 million, this is an indication for the following years. So some years could be lower, could even be a little bit higher, but this is the best indication for the following years. So in one quarter, it could be higher or lower. But CapEx is never a topic which you can exactly p lan in a quarter. Even in one year, it's difficult to make a precise prediction. But over the long run, even if you're looking back about our CapEx numbers in the past, then you see clear trends and levels. So to bring it together, EUR 350 million per annum is always the best indication also for now and for this year and for the future. In retail, let me say, of course, you have the different categories, and some are running better and some are running weaker. So we have relatively a little bit weaker sales in fashion. This has to do with supply shortages regarding top brands like Hermès, also like Rolex, also Gucci. Also, cosmetics are a little bit lower as well as banking services. So these are the underperforming items. Clear better is, as always, food and beverage, also above our plans. Car rentals is running very good. And also the classical duty-free stuff, cigarettes, etc., this is also running very nice. Thank you. That's very helpful. Thanks. Welcome. As a reminder, anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star one. And the next question comes from Dario Maglione from BNP Paribas. Please go ahead. Hi. Good afternoon. Three questions for me. The first one, if you can come back to slide 33 where you discussed the wage agreement, what kind of impact shall we expect in Q2 in terms of increase year-on-year? Is it 5.5% year-on-year, or is it more? Second question on tariff, looking longer term. Frankfurt has almost always under-earned its allowed WACC over the past 15 years. Why do you think the future will be different? Has anything significant changed in your relationship with Lufthansa? Final question, just going back to your point that you might be selling the 10% stake in the airport. Some of your peers, of course, are investing in India, whereas you are looking to sell. What is your view of the Indian airport market? Thanks. First question, tariff impact. So you make a reference to slide 33. First of all, it's always very difficult now on the tariff agreement side. As a rough number, take 5.5% up from Q1 as a step up. This is the best guidance, so to say, for the personnel cost increase. It's even a little bit more than 5%. Yeah. Take maximum 7%. Then the tariff or the fee increase. It's absolutely correct. We under-earned, and we never reached what is possible in the market. That's the reason why, if you look back now, you see, I think, relatively good fee increases with 9.5% in this year, also with the increases in the previous two years before the 9.5 increase. This was a good step up. Our guidance for 2025, a relatively high single-digit increase. I think this reflects our intention and ambition to go up with the fees, to go up with the return on assets, and to come very close to what is allowed based on the regulated asset base. This is our clear target coming from the past where we didn't cover our cost of capital. India, it's difficult. On one side, it's a fantastic market with a growing population, with a lot of potentials and opportunities. But since years, we have, and we had this 10% stake. Let me say, when you run an airport and you have strong partners and you have just 10%, the degree of your influence, your potential influence, is very limited. We have a good partner. We have a strong partner. He's dominating. This is fair because he has a majority of the shares. In other words, we cannot bring in additional value in these assets. That's the reason why we say, "Hey, we want to leave it with a good return and a good profitability related to this, what we have invested." This will be the exit. You will see when the exit is on the table that this will show a good return. This is number one. Number two, our initial plan was to start with 10% at New Delhi and to show a good performance. I think this we did together with our partners and then trying to find new opportunities, investment opportunities in the Indian market. And here, we have to say, we have not been successful in identifying and realizing such opportunities. We tried it to do it, but we can say we failed. We have not been successful. And that's the reason now we are in there since years. And we said, "Okay. We stick to the opinion that this is a good market, but we were not able to make something out of this good market." And that's the reason why we decided to leave the market. Long story made short. Yeah. No. Thank you. And sorry, can I just have a quick follow-up on the first question on slide 33? Just to clarify whether I understood correctly, you mentioned a maximum 7% increase in wages relative to Q1 2024. Am I understanding correctly? I didn't hear your number. What did you say? Maximum 7% relative to Q1 2024. Yeah Okay. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's Q&A session. I would now like to turn the conference back over to Florian Fuchs for any closing remarks. Yeah. Thank you, everyone, for the good questions. Any follow-ups, do reach out to us in the IR department or meet us on the road. With that, yeah, have a goo d rest of the day and speak to you in a bit. Bye. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now concluded, and you may disconnect. Thank you for joining and have a pleasant day.