Welcome everyone to our Q1 earnings call. Today I'd like to quickly refresh your memory on our vision and mission for the company before covering the highlights of the first quarter, and then handing over to Christian for our financials and our updated guidance. It was less than 10 years ago when we actually started HelloFresh from a blank sheet of paper. Shortly thereafter, we sat down with, by then I think it was a five-person team, and articulated what our mission should be. As we now go into our 10th year of existence, our mission remains as relevant as on our first day. It says, "We change the way people eat forever." What we mean by that is that we offer our consumers an affordable, convenient, and delicious way to cook the best meals at home, and hence fundamentally changing their home cooking experience. Seven of 10 dinners globally, and five in 10 dinners in the U.S. are cooked and consumed at home. This is one of the largest consumer spend categories, and at the same time, a category that has seen very little innovation and disruption in the last couple of decades. That's what we're here to change. In our Capital Markets Day in December, we also outlined our vision for the group, which is to evolve from a leading meal kit company to a fully integrated food solutions group. Already today, you can see our broad suite of product offerings to consumers. We are not only the undisputed market leader in meal kits, but have also added innovative new meal kit brands like Green Chef and EveryPlate to our roster. We have very successfully expanded into ready meals with the acquisition of Factor. We've made first forays into online grocery by scaling up our HelloFresh Market in Benelux. From a portfolio perspective, I think as of today, we already touch a lot of the different buckets of a consumer's food budget, and we will increasingly continue to do so going forward. Over the course of the year, we should get to close to EUR 1 billion in cash on our balance sheet, and I can promise you that we will continue to focus relentlessly on making our value proposition to consumers better and better over time. With more meals on the menu, better service levels, more competitive pricing, we will go after the huge home cooking TAM while adding many more exciting products to our offering, and hence allowing us to capture a larger part of our consumers' food budget. With that quick refresher, let's turn to the near past and actually focus on what happened in the recent first quarter of 2021. First of all, we continued with our impressive customer growth rates. We added sequentially about one million customers, both in the U.S. and in international, to 7.3 million customers from 5.3 million customers in Q4 2020. Most of that was driven by unlocking new capacity in our footprint. Secondly, we also saw a beneficial impact from the ongoing pandemic with both order rates and AOV up year-over-year, but slightly down sequentially, very much in line with our projections that we gave on the capital markets day in December. Q1 also marks the highest ever net revenue quarter, amounting to EUR 1.44 billion in a single quarter. With EUR 159 million in adjusted EBITDA, that's an 11% EBITDA margin. This was also among our most successful quarters ever, and outperforming some of our internal plans. Moreover, the team delivered on time, in full, and on budget, four new large manufacturing sites, two in the U.S. and two in international, more specifically in the Netherlands and in the U.K. We also saw our recent acquisition, Factor75, doing very well in the first quarter. Our synergy plans came to life, and we managed to scale the business quite successfully and continue to see good momentum, which gives us a lot of conviction that we're able to execute M&A deals very successfully. Given the positive trading year to date, as well as the robust outlook across all markets and all future growth initiatives that will be landing over the course of this year, we have upgraded our guidance and now expect revenue growth between 35% and 45% for 2021. Focusing on customer growth. Q1 is typically the seasonally most favorable period of the year for us, with customers staying home, the weather usually not that great in large parts of the northern hemisphere, and hence, that's where we usually focus our marketing initiatives disproportionately over the course of the year. This has paid off quite a bit. Customer count has gone up by about 74% year-over-year, from 4.2 million customers same period last year, to 7.3 million customers in the first quarter of 2021. That's not only very strong year-on-year growth, but also very strong sequential growth, because we added both in the U.S. as well as in international, about one million households. Sequentially, we grew by about two million from 5.3 million- 7.3 million customers. This also sets us on a very strong trajectory for the remainder of the year. As we go into the second quarter, the third quarter, and the fourth quarter, we also expect very robust year-on-year growth given the customer base that we have now attracted and that continues to order at high rates. Order rates have been up by about 14% year-over-year, from 3.5 orders to now about four orders. That is slightly less than what we have seen in the fourth quarter and can be explained by the fact that, number one, markets have been opening up post-pandemic in large parts of our geographies. Secondly, that we also had an influx of new customers. If you think about customers on average joining about halfway through the quarter, that is also something that somewhat drives down the average number of order that every customer can get in a given quarter. It is still meaningfully above pre-pandemic levels, though. We expect over the course of the year, it will stabilize or slightly go down from the level that we have seen right now. The exact and the right way to look at it is always on year-over-year numbers rather than sequentially, because there is some seasonality in our business. On AOV, we also increased AOV year-over-year by about 4%. At the height of the pandemic, we had average order values up by about 10%-12%. You can see that it has been slightly coming down. Again, this is partly due to the fact that we've actually increased and brought in a lot of new customers over the course of the quarter. New customers usually come with price incentives. Nonetheless, if you look at it compared to pre-pandemic, you can see that baskets have remained larger and that also we have benefited from actually broadening our product portfolio and customers attaching more and more products to their order. Not only meal kits, but also from the suite of products that we offer, most prominently in the Benelux in our HelloFresh Market, but also in other geographies. Our offering has just become quite a bit larger, and that is reflected in higher AOVs compared to pre-pandemic levels. If you put all of these three things together, very strong customer growth, continued high order rates, better AOV than pre-pandemic levels, you can see how we've also achieved the best ever revenue quarter of the company, because we've grown revenue from about EUR 700 million last year, all the way to EUR 1.44 billion in the first quarter of 2021. That's a 116% increase in constant currency and something that I believe is really a testament to the fact how much consumers love the product and how well we actually hit the nerve of consumers. Key drivers have been, as I just reiterated, the strong customer growth supported by ongoing high order rates and AOV. I'd like to hand over to Christian to lead you to the rest of the presentation before being back for Q&A. Great. Let me turn now to our key profitability metrics, starting with contribution margin. Our contribution margin is down year-on-year by around about 60 basis points to 28.2%. This is a result of a number of partly offsetting effects. On the one side, we saw an improvement in procurement expenses as a percentage of revenues by 0.6%, but at the same time, our fulfillment expenses increased as a percentage of revenues by 1.2%. Why is that? That's been driven by a number of factors. Number one, as Dominik had alluded to in his intro, we ramped up multiple new fulfillment centers during that quarter, both in the U.S. as well as in international. Secondly, in our U.S. business in February, we saw meaningful weather disruptions. Two out of those four weeks in February were impacted by heavy snowstorms. That somewhat impacted also our production expenses in those weeks. Thirdly, given that we've added a lot of new customers through our service in Q1, and new customers typically come with a certain level of price incentives that we offer, that has a certain impact on margins as well. Looking forward into Q2, you should assume that contribution margin as we continue to ramp up new fulfillment centers and also in the packaging side, basically when the weather gets warmer, also have a certain increase in our packaging costs. You should assume that contribution margin for Q2 remains broadly stable to slightly up versus what you've seen from us in Q1. That also means from a year-on-year perspective, so versus Q2 last year, contribution margins should be meaningfully higher, given that Q2 last year was impacted on the contribution margin level meaningfully by COVID effects. Let me turn now to our marketing expenses. Our marketing expenses as percentage of revenue are lower by 1.8 percentage points compared to last year. With that, we sit at the low end of the range that we had guided for the full year, i.e., the 15%-17%. We managed to end up there at the low end, despite us adding two million customers sequentially in this quarter. We've achieved this because customer acquisition costs are still at attractive levels and give us very strong ROI on that marketing spend. On top of that, we still see high order rates and strong retention by our existing customers. Existing customers obviously generate revenues and profits without us having to target them through marketing initiatives. With that, let's have a look at our EBITDA. Despite us ramping up four new fulfillment centers, despite us meaningfully expanding our customer base, actually, the biggest sequential expansion that we ever delivered is what we've delivered in Q1. Despite us expanding new adjacent verticals, our ready-to-eat business, our HelloFresh Market business, despite all of that, we generated a very strong EBITDA margin of 11%, two points better than in Q1 last year. That represents EUR 159 million absolute EBITDA in that quarter. This industry-leading profitability is very broad-based, which you see when you look at the profitability of our two segments. Both segments delivered double-digit EBITDA margins with our U.S. segment with a margin of 11.5% and our international segment with 13.3%. That's a summary of our P&L in Q1. Let me now switch gears a little bit and talk about our cash flows. In Q1, we achieved again, very strong cash flow from operations of EUR 209 million. This is driven by very strong profitability, so the EUR 159 million EBITDA that we just looked at. On top of that, given the strong sequential growth that we've delivered in Q1, we also saw meaningful cash inflow from working capital of close to EUR 100 million in that first quarter. Let's also talk about our investment cash flow. We've deployed EUR 27 million in CapEx in that first quarter. That's a number that you should expect to continue to rise over the coming three quarters. Given that our growth is now even stronger than we initially anticipated, we also want to bring forward certain investment projects. That means we're planning now for 2021 with CapEx of EUR 200 million instead of the EUR 150 million we had initially guided for this year. Let's also talk about our cash flow from financing. This comprises primarily two parts. One is the, let's say business as usual amortization payments of our financial leases, around about EUR 7 million in that quarter. On top of that, this also includes EUR 39 million cash payments for the settlement of share-based compensation. For share-based compensation, we have the choice to settle those either in shares or in cash. Given that this time, at the time when those share-based compensation became due, our share price was in the low EUR 60s, we decided it was better value for our shareholders to settle actually this in cash rather than creating dilution at that share price level for our shareholders. In sum, if you put all of this together, despite us investing meaningfully into the infrastructure capabilities of our business and, at the same time deploying active capital management, we continue to increase our cash position. Around about EUR 150 million alone in this first quarter of 2021. Let me conclude now by repeating our guidance for the full year 2021, which we had increased on April 15. We've increased our constant currency revenue guidance for the year from previously 20%-25% to now 35%-45%. All that I had said previously with respect to our expected average order value for the full year being between EUR 48 and EUR 49 and our average order rate on a quarterly basis to be between EUR 3.7 and EUR 3.8 for the full year, that still holds true. No changes to what we discussed at our capital markets day. Same applies to that we still expect our customers to revert back to a normal seasonality pattern this year, i.e., lower order rates, lower customer acquisition activity from late June through end of August. No changes to that, but given the strong increase in our customer base, which we've achieved already by Q1, that basically has led us to increase our revenue guidance for the year to those levels. Given a decent EBITDA performance that we've delivered in Q1, we also decided to narrow our EBITDA margin guidance from previously 9%-12%, to now 10%-12%. With that, we look forward to your questions. Ladies and gentlemen, we will now begin our question and answer session. If you have a question for our speakers, please dial zero and one on your telephone keypad now to enter the queue. Once your name has been announced, you can ask a question. If you find your question is answered before it is your turn to speak, you can dial zero and two to cancel your question. If you are using speaker equipment today, please lift the handset before making your selection. One moment, please, for the first question. The first question is from Shikha Sakhya, Morgan Stanley. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Great. Good morning, everyone. Three questions for me. First of all, on the active customer growth was clearly very strong in the first quarter. Can you touch on the mix between new customers and reactivations in the quarter and going into second half and perhaps even into next year, are you assuming overall retention will remain above pre-COVID levels? Second, on the different geographies, can you share with us what are some of the fastest-growing markets at the moment, and are there any remaining capacity issues across your markets? Lastly, on Factor, now that you've had a few months with Factor, how have your expectations for the prepared meal segment changed? How big of an opportunity do you think it can be? Would you seek to do similar acquisitions in international? Lastly, can you share whether Factor is already profitable? Thank you. Okay. Thanks, Sakhya. Let me take your first two questions. On active customers and share of reactivation, reactivations were round about in the mid-20s, low-to-mid 20s across the group. Somewhat lower than what we had seen pre-pandemic. This is basically driven by strength that we've seen basically, also on the activation front than anything else. In terms of growth differential between our geos, that growth that we've experienced also in Q1 is really very broad-based. In substantially each of our markets, we've seen very strong year-on-year growth. With respect to capacity, I would say the overall situation is much better than what we had experienced during large parts of 2020. Having said that, there were still a couple of markets where we had to actively steer demand, especially in the first half of Q1. Germany, for example, is one example where we added throughout the quarter further production lines. There, at least until end of February, we still had to be quite careful to not generate more demand than what we could fulfill. Yeah, to be fair, I think that also applies in large parts to the U.S. Not that we were trading at 100% capacity utilization, but very close to it. Certainly, not as much an issue as it has been over the past 12 months, but we're also nowhere near to be fully de-bottlenecked, and there's still a number of initiatives, et cetera, that we're holding back on. With regards to Factor, I think overall it's been very good. It's been very strong. The teams have been working together very closely. We have seen a lot of synergies come to life. We've seen a very strong growth momentum in the first quarter. I think it underscores our ability to do M&A and then also to very quickly leverage our growth playbook. I think the team and the team's motivation has been great, really bringing a lot of the growth playbook that we like and that we have played in the last couple of years is something that we have certainly seen can drive a very big difference in a short amount of time. If you think as of today, our smaller brands, Factor, EveryPlate, Green Chef, I think each of those brands is on track to become a very large part. To be fair, in private markets, I think each of those brands would probably be valued at much, much higher multiples than as part of the group at the moment. Great. Thank you. The next question is from Fabienne Caron, Kepler. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Three quick questions from my side. The first one regarding your marketing spend. It was higher in the U.S. than in international. Does it mean that you're using more price incentive strategy for the international part of your business, and this is a way to look at it for the remaining part of the year? Second question would be, can you remind us how the add-ons are working in your new countries? How consumer reacting to that, as well, how consumer reacting to your grocery offering, in the Benelux? Finally, how should we think about potential wage inflation in the U.S. going forward? Thank you. In terms of marketing spend, I think over the whole of Q1, we saw overall, a pretty good environment. Customer acquisition cost has come back to levels that we've seen towards the end of 2019 and the beginning of 2020, so pre-pandemic levels. At the same time, that means that it's still extremely attractive to us. For every marketing dollar that we spend, we actually make that back in less than six months, and we make close to 100% return on every marketing dollar that we spend within 12 months. That's pretty much unheard of. If you think of U.S. versus international, then I think in the U.S., we basically opened up two new facilities. With those two new facilities, we actually also wanted to scale them up and get them to a certain scale to operate them efficiently. That's why we have also invested slightly more in the U.S. compared to international. We've also seen that obviously pent-up demand has been quite strong in the U.S. I think that's a little bit the story on marketing. We were quite happy with what we've seen, and we think that puts us on a very good trajectory for the remainder of the year. In terms of add-ons, which I think was your second question, so first of all, there is our normal add-on store, which we have in literally every market, and then there is the advanced version, our HelloFresh Market, which we have in Benelux. In Benelux, we have continued to add more products to our HelloFresh Market. It now stands at close to 150 products. With those 150 products, we have seen that as we add more products, we also get higher attach rates from consumers, and we actually have seen a beneficial impact both on AOV as well as on the average profit that we clip per order. For the remainder of the year, we will certainly continue to add more products to it and then observe and monitor how these relationships hold true. The more products we add, the more attach rates and the higher baskets we get. We will be monitoring that closely, and at the same time, we will also start rolling out our HelloFresh Market in some of the other countries. In most of our other countries, right now, we have about 25 products on offer, and we'll scale that up in a number of other markets to over 100 products over the course of this year. Which puts us on a very good trajectory to scale it up further in the outer years and really eats into consumers' food budget, capture a larger part of consumers' food budget over time. Fabienne, on your third question, the wage inflation question. There is a certain element of that as the economies come back, including the U.S., we also see a certain effect in our direct labor wages, but all of that is priced into the margin guidance that we've put out. Okay, thanks a lot. The next question is from Robert Berg, Berenberg. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi, everyone. Three questions if I can. The first is perhaps a little tedious, but you mentioned many of your markets have started reopening. Could you just give us some examples of what you've seen still in Australia, New Zealand, regions of the U.S., those that are perhaps more open than others, both in terms of the customer growth in Q1, but also perhaps more interestingly, the order frequency and the basket size there. The second question on Green Chef you launched recently in the U.K. Interested to know what appealed to you about the U.K. I assume it's too early to say how that's going, but maybe some comments on initial interest, any color you could give there, and maybe remind us how many countries you expect to add either Green Chef or EveryPlate in 2021. The third question is around seasonality of margin. Q1, typically the lowest margin quarter of the year. Your guidance implies it's not the case this year. How should we be thinking about the seasonality of margin through 2021? Thanks. Very quickly on Green Chef. What appealed to us, U.K. is I think a very developed market. It's a market where we also have different competitors, where we have built out our menu quite strongly over the last couple of years. U.K. customers have in the HelloFresh brand amongst the largest choice already. We think that to expand further in the U.K., there was a strong desire in the market that we've seen in customer research for also more premium offerings for more specialty diet. We felt very well equipped in terms of our resourcing, in terms of our fulfillment center infrastructure, the state of automation in our manufacturing sites, that we can deliver a great product to consumers, that's why we picked U.K. as the first market for Green Chef to internationalize. With regards to EveryPlate, we have that live in the U.S., we have that live in Canada, and we have that live in Australia. That already covers around 70% or 75% of our geographic coverage. In EveryPlate, we're a step further. Over the remainder of the year, we'll see if we further internationalize it. There are certainly more country launches coming. Yeah, as you said, in terms of performance, it's very early. We just launched it, I think, two or three weeks ago. Hence, I think we're in the phase, we're really trying to understand the market, where we're looking very closely at customer feedback. If the type of meals, the advertising, the messaging resonates with customers. As we see proof points for that, we're then also willing to scale it up. With regards to the first part of your question, reopening of economies, I think I can only underline what we said on our Capital Markets Day, which is that Australia and New Zealand have obviously returned to normalcy quite a while ago, and here we can see them going back to normal seasonal patterns. In summertime, slightly lower order rates and lower AOV as we've come out of the pandemic, stabilizing nicely. I think very much in line with the projections that we had, which is no surprise to me because we have a 20-person demand forecasting team that looks at customer-level data and is usually very good at making accurate predictions. We can only underline what we said during the Capital Markets Day, that there haven't been any surprises. Same for the U.S. We want to refrain from giving state-by-state data, but certainly, in the U.S., I would say about half of the country has been wide open. If you look at our Q1 numbers, I think you can be very bullish on the future outlook. I think overall, customers just having switched to buying more online over the course of the pandemic, have seen that there are clear advantages in not using an online grocery service, but using a full meal solution like HelloFresh. That you can see in continued very robust order rates. We don't see huge differences between the states that have opened a little more up and the ones that are more closed. Rob, on your question on margin seasonality, if you leave out some of the COVID special effects that we saw in 2020, typically from a contribution margin perspective, our weakest quarter is Q3. Q3, peak holiday season in most of our markets, i.e., lower order rates during that quarter. We still obviously have the same fixed cost base, that basically impacts our contribution margin somewhat. Also highest temperature in most of our markets, i.e., more insulation materials and higher packaging costs during that quarter. Q3 typically from a contribution margin perspective, the softest quarter and similar on the EBITDA margin. That falls through to the EBITDA margin as well. On top of that, in terms of our marketing invest in September, we dial that up meaningfully in the back-to-school period in most of our markets, where the benefit of that then is mostly seen in Q4, but expenses are front-end loaded into September already. That means when you think about this year, Q2, similarly healthy margins to what you've seen from us now in Q1. Q3, you should assume margins are seasonally somewhat lower, and then Q4 basically back up again. Perfect. Thank you. The next question is from Nizla Naizer, Deutsche Bank. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you. I have three questions as well. Firstly, on the guidance for 2021, I'm just trying to understand what your thinking is in terms of what needs to happen for you to hit the upper end of the range and what's sort of incorporated in the lower end of the range when it comes to revenue growth. How we should think of the next three quarters of the year in terms of customer additions, given in my calculations too, even with the upper end, we're likely to see the customer base sort of decline over the next couple of quarters. Is that the right assumption given the seasonality you're incorporating? Some color there would be great. My second question is on the capacity expansion. Could you remind us again, how much of incremental revenue capacity did you add in the U.S. with the two new sites that you opened, and how much more can we expect over the rest of the year? If I'm not mistaken, there's one other facility coming up in the U.S. Some color there would be great. My third question is on current trading as well. If you look at consensus, there's a 30%+ sort of growth assumed for Q2, which is still, I guess, great given the comp from last year. Is that still too conservative in your view? Some color there would also be great. Thank you. Okay, great. Nizla, let me take your first and your third question together. What defines the two bookends of our guidance? I would say the upper half is effectively continuing in terms of, let's say, underlying trends as we do right now with the normal seasonality baked in. The lower end basically takes a couple of sensitivities around seasonality potentially being a bit more pronounced than, or somewhat more pronounced than what we would consider, let's say, a completely business as usual environment. That's ballpark what defines the two bookends of our guidance. What does that mean for our customer development? Into Q2, you should assume our customer number to be broadly at the current level, potentially even a touch up from where we sit right now. Q3, as we dial back on new customer acquisitions, typically for at least two months out of the three months in Q3, you could see that going down a little bit and then up again in Q4. That's going to be the seasonal pattern that we foresee on our customer development. What does it mean in terms of quarterly revenue development for Q3? You should assume down versus current levels because of lower order rates, as we had discussed before from a seasonal perspective. In terms of your question on capacity expansion, we had outlined in our capital markets day that we effectively wanted to, versus Q3 last year as a baseline, we wanted to substantially double that capacity by Q1 2022, and we are well on track towards that goal. I would say from a capacity perspective, between one third and half towards that direction. What you should see in the U.S. is basically another site in Texas coming on stream now relatively soon, towards the end of the second quarter. Then there's another site going live by the end of the year. Also in international Australia, Canada, other geographies, we have a number of new fulfillment centers, which are still going to come on stream between now and Q1 2022. Great. Thank you. The next question is from Marcus Diebel, JPMorgan. Your line is now open. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi, everyone. Also three questions from my side. The first one maybe on Factor again. Could you maybe tell us a bit more what the experience is so far, but how you sell it, I mean, i.e., how many boxes in those areas where you sell it in the U.S. have already a ready-made meal in there? Is it all incremental or are consumers choosing two meal kits and add just one ready-made meal? That would be quite helpful. I assume retention is improving if Factor is included, but that would be quite helpful. The second question is on something I asked before, is the question, how much of your customers, both new customers and reactivations, actually pay the original price? I know you don't disclose this, but if you could maybe help us a little bit to understand, is that actually a relevant question? Is that something to think about, or do you think running on a longer term base on discounts is actually okay for the business? That would be quite interesting just to see where the levels of discount boxes actually are in the mix. The third question, if you can just update us again on new markets. Where are we in terms of launches? What new markets can we expect in the next two, three quarters for launch? Norway, Italy, you said last time, I think Japan takes a bit, just an update what we can see as incremental markets throughout the year, that would be helpful. Marcus, let me try to tackle your questions. Going back to Factor, I think the logic behind the acquisition was to expand our TAM, because if you look at the customer base that Factor had, we can see that they over-indexed on singles, that they over-indexed male, and that they over-indexed on using the products for lunch rather than for dinner. That's what we really liked about it. Right now we only sell it as a standalone product, meaning you need to subscribe to Factor. You cannot use your HelloFresh account to actually subscribe with Factor. You need to register from scratch. We also don't sell any of the Factor meals into our HelloFresh customer base. That's something that we think is very promising, but which we will only be able to do potentially next year. At the moment, we've been laser focused in improving the underlying fundamentals of the business of Factor, and hence allowing it to scale very efficiently and at great customer acquisition costs. Again, if you think about the broader context, expanding TAM, and then kind of like how big is the ready-to-eat space, then I'm very convinced that number one, in the private markets, I think with the growth momentum, et cetera, that we're seeing, it would already be valued at very much higher valuation than what we paid for it in a couple of months ago. Secondly, that there is a lot of growth runway. If you think about our goal to achieve EUR 10 billion in revenue over the next couple of years, then I think Factor in the U.S. as a standalone, in the U.S. and selling it into the HelloFresh customer base, and then eventually internationalizing it, can contribute meaningfully to that EUR 10 billion revenue goal. That's really the logic around Factor, and we're just in the very first innings about what we want to do with the brand and what we want to do in that space, but we do think it's very attractive. Secondly, your question on customers that pay the, I think you called it original price. Number one, there is a headline price. Undiscounted price, yeah. Undiscounted price. Customers have different price incentives. Some customers have a high price incentive on the first orders. Other customers have smaller price incentives on multiple orders. If you look at our overall customer base, the vast majority of customers is, in any given week, not subject to any price incentives. Price incentives, however, are a very important measure for us. We much rather give a price incentive to customers to try out our service and form a habit over the first couple of weeks, than giving that same money to Facebook, Google, or anyone else to do advertising. We much rather convince customers to come in at a very attractive price point, try out the service, form a habit, and then basically go on to pay an undiscounted price. If you look at our profitability, I think we could discount a lot more or give a lot more incentives, and we just don't need to, because after customers have formed a habit and understand the value of the product at an undiscounted price, they usually become quite sticky. With the pricing structure that we have at the moment, to use price incentives mostly to get customers through the door and then to allow them to form a habit at a very advantageous price, that is something that has proven very successful over and over again over the last couple of years, and more successful than spending the same amount of money on advertising on TV, Facebook, Google, or any other platform. Okay. Yeah. No, very clear. From your answers, I should assume it's the vast majority, I think, as you said, so 80%+, is that fair? Pay the undiscounted price, roughly. I can't give you that answer off top of my head. It's not something that I look at a regular basis. Okay. The next question is from- In terms of country launches, I think, again, what we had disclosed at the Capital Markets Day is that we want to scale our new brands over the course of the year. That's what we did with the Factor acquisition and with the Green Chef U.K. launch. We also said we'll be launching new geographies over the course of the year. There are two that are in the mix for this year, and when we have updates on fixed launch dates, we'll make sure you'll be among the first to hear about them. They're certainly on the plan for the rest of the year. The next question is from Clément Genelot, Bryan Garnier, your line is now open. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thank you. I got two questions from my side, if I may. The first one is on retention rates, and especially in the U.S. What's your view on this rate? Is it still up versus pre-COVID levels or now flat? My second question is on raw materials and inflation. I know that some big food manufacturers are already highlighting inflationary pressures on food such as milk and also on some packaging. What's your view on this, and do you intend to absorb it or pass it on to customers? Thank you. In terms of retention rates, we have seen over time, over the last couple of years, that we have structurally improved order rates from our customers as we have invested in better pricing, as we have invested in better service levels, and as we have invested in more choice for our consumers. If you compare customers from 2017 to 2018 to 2019 to 2020, I think over all those years, we have seen that our retention rates have structurally improved as we have improved the product and basically created more value for each consumer that we serve. I think it is also important to note that if you look at our average retention rates, that we benefit from very high order rates right in the beginning, and then kind of settle on the same pace as other leading e-commerce companies. Putting the two together, making our payback periods much, much quicker and making the overall cash efficiency much, much better than in food delivery or in overall e-commerce. That is something that is, I think, structurally really important to understand. In the U.S., I think you definitely have seen that during COVID, these sort of structural trends have seen or have gained further momentum. As customers have been staying home more, as customers have been working more from home, they've also ordered more frequently. As we've seen some of the states more opening up and as we've seen more countries moving back to a pre-pandemic environment over time, we've also seen that there is some impact on our retention rate, but structurally, we continue to see the same trend. If we compare the first quarter of 2019 with the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2021, that you still see structurally us improving because we're just adding more and more value to our offering to consumers. Clément, on your second question on ingredient price inflation. There's a certain level of that. Having said that, if you look at our track record of decreasing procurement expenses as percentage of revenues, I would say that track record is very strong and you should expect from us that's not going to fundamentally change going forward, i.e., the levers that we have ourselves in terms of optimizing our supplier conditions, in terms of our menu planning. If there's a certain price inflation attached to a certain category of ingredients, we have much higher flexibility to just bring different recipes, use different ingredients, and are not exposed to those kind of inflations as, let's say, a normal general grocer. That will continue. You should expect us to be able to maintain a very attractive procurement expense as percentage of revenues. For us it's also not an automatism in terms of passing on price inflation to our customers. We set our pricing effectively at the levels where we, based on our price tests, can optimize for total cumulative profits that we achieve in those markets. It's not one-for-one linked to underlying food price inflation. With that, we probably have to wrap it up here and let you go to your other commitments. We're already seven minutes over time. Thank you very much, everyone.