Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for standing by. I'm Stuart, your Chorus Call operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining Schaeffler Group Q1 2021 earnings conference call. Throughout today's recorded presentation, all participants will be in a listen-only mode. Presentation will be followed by a question and answer session. If you would like to ask a question, you may press star followed by one on your touchtone telephone. Press the star key followed by zero for operator assistance. I would like to turn the conference over to Renata Casaro, Head of IR. Please go ahead. Thank you, Stuart. Dear investors, dear analysts, good morning. Welcome to the first quarter 2021 earnings call of the Schaeffler Group. Mr. Rosenfeld, Group CEO, and Dr. Patzak, Group CFO, will take you through the presentation slides prepared by the IR team. May I remind you to limit the number of your follow-up questions to one, so that everyone has the chance to participate in the call. Without further ado, I leave the floor to Mr. Rosenfeld. Klaus, the floor is yours. Thank you very much, Renata. Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to our Q1 results conference call. You received the PM this morning. I think it is fair to summarize this is another strong quarter in an ongoing market recovery. The key figures were pre-released on April 19th. The real news from this morning is that we decided, after finalizing our forecasting work, to raise our guidance. That is, from my point of view, a sign of confidence, despite the volatile and still uncertain environment that we are facing for the rest of this year. Before I come to my first page with the key message, let me say one sentence on the latest market rumors. You all saw that Bloomberg had a quick note yesterday on the ABB Dodge situation. I want to tackle this upfront. You will understand that as a matter of principle we do not comment on such market rumors. Let me come to the key messages. Q1 sales strong, 11.2% up, driven by China, in particular in automotive, very strong, 74%. Shouldn't come as a big surprise, the Q1 gross margin that Klaus will explain in more detail later on, showed a positive year-on-year development also here, clearly driven by auto tech. We can say this is a broader recovery. All the three divisions showed two double-digit EBIT margins. What is also a reflection of the continuous overhead cost control. Free cash flow, EUR 130 million in the first quarter, is positive, driven in particular by the higher EBITDA and lower CapEx. The weaker quarters are behind us and below the previous year, clearly due to the restructuring cash-outs that will also continue throughout the year. Net working capital outflows, in particular driven by higher receivables and also higher inventory need. Return on capital is back in the range that we articulated as part of our midterm targets. Here you also see the capital discipline that we initiated some time ago clearly pays off. The other news that I have for you today is that our Restructuring Program, and I'll give you more detail in a moment, that we initiated in September 2020, is progressing well. We are in the final stage of the negotiations, and I can say that we think that they will be finalized and closed in the next couple of days. The Restructuring Program will lead to the financial impact that we indicated when we announced it, and also the overall net headcount reduction will come in as planned. That's, from my point of view, something that will help us going forward to further improve our results and our value creation. Guidance upgraded. I think you saw the news. Higher sales growth, EBIT margin, and in particular, free cash flow raised up to more than EUR 300 million. Let me go through the slide with the highlights and the lowlights. You have probably read this. I will do this rather short. What is positive for us, the recovery is driven not only by one region but by a broader development. All regions growing in Q1. Europe still lagging a little bit, but China clearly outstanding. Region Americas also with a clear indication of a continued and strong recovery. What is interesting as an industry trend, we observe an increased need for individual mobility solutions, and that leads to a stronger demand across the divisions. We can also say as a third point that the more cyclical recovery is beginning in infrastructure and equipment. That goes hand in hand with a sustained high demand for renewable energy products, and that's good for our wind business. Last but not least, I said it before, cost and capital discipline is not a quarterly topic. It's something that we initiated quite some time ago, and we now see the positive effects, and we will stay very focused on making sure that that also continues. The restructuring program will help us at that front. On the more negative side, I think we all agree that the COVID situation is not finally solved. There are positive signs in particular also here in Germany, but other countries around the globe are suffering. We are still very much focused on our employees health and safety and want to make sure that in any case, no one gets infected. The market headwinds and the uncertainties have increased. You also see this in a more, softer order demand behavior from our big automotive OEM customers. The semiconductor shortage is difficult to assess. We think that Schaeffler is not as much affected as others. There is a bullwhip effect at the moment visible. How it normalizes remains to be seen, but it's clearly creating uncertainty also for the second half of the year. You see the stress in the supply chain very well with the special freights that are on a high level, compared to the previous year. That's clearly an indicator for the challenging situation that we're dealing with. Also cost inflation, raw materials, Klaus will comment on this later on, remains an issue that we are monitoring very proactively and where we also have the experience to deal with that. Let me come to the divisions, I will rather keep that short on the numbers because, I'm conscious of your time. You see that Automotive here printed some strong numbers, 24.5% gross margin, 15.8% sales, and EBIT margin in the first quarter, 10.8%. That's clearly exceptional and helps us also for the rest of the year. In terms of the business, outperformance was at the low end of the range, 2%-5%. There is a significant base effect in China. If China grows more than 70%, you can imagine that it's very difficult to outgrow this in a meaningful manner. We are confident that for the rest of the year, we will stay within the 2%-5% range. Good order intake in E-Mobility, also a good growth rate. Clearly that goes hand in hand with the strong mature business. The logic that we separated, as outlined in our Capital Markets Day, new business and mature business more distinctively, is really paying off. The strengths of our mature business is a very much supporting factor also going forward. Semiconductor shortage, I mentioned, and the supply chain situation remains an issue. Let me go from there to page number eight. Once again, we want to give you some of the key themes, why we think that we are on the winning track. That is clearly linked to this idea of mature and new business. We see a substantial increase in E-Mobility projects and acquisitions, if we compare Q1 2021- Q1 2020. We can say, I will show this in the next slide, we won a strong and big order in the interesting heavy-duty hybrid module market. We are seeing that in particular our E-motor and wave winding technology in the Chinese market, allows us to generate bigger orders. Also last but not least, a smaller step, but long-term, very important, the strategic cooperation with REFIRE for hydrogen technology and fuel cells, is a step in the right direction. Next page nine has the example from the E-Mobility heavy-duty order intake. A large order for a new customer. We are providing here a hybrid module. This is our first nomination in that area, and we are very proud that we can deliver a three-in-one system with integrated power electronics that also helps us to leverage our recuperation technology. A groundbreaking order that is immediately linked to the U.S. market that we see as one of the key growth markets. Let me go to Automotive Aftermarket. Automotive Aftermarket also had a strong quarter, with certainly lower growth, 12.9% margin, at the level, clearly below first quarter 2020, but that was an exceptional quarter. Yes, we are still seeing some headwinds from the double cost structure. You have heard this numerous times before. There's also clearly challenges here on the sourcing side. On the other hand, the strategy in terms of digitalizations pays off the new e-commerce platform in China is a good basis for a strong sales performance going forward. All in all, while the development is less spectacular than automotive technology, things on track, clearly lower margin because of higher product cost. You see on the next page a little bit insight from the business. Also here, how do we win? The LCV business growth opportunity is for us, also here, an interesting area to grow. We definitely observe an acceleration of e-commerce and last-mile delivery services. Also together with the urbanization trends. I don't want to go too far here, but this is clearly an area that provides growth potential going forward. You see that a more distinctive sectorial view helps also to discover new areas of growth. Going into one more page here, on page 12, the U.S. angle. You know that the U.S. is the second biggest market for our Automotive Aftermarket division. Here we have been able to expand our product portfolio and secure business growth based on our technological leadership. Several examples. One good example is the torque converter, a specific product for the U.S. market, where our innovative designs helps to penetrate the channels in a much better way. Here, longer life, superior performance are the key USPs for us going forward, together with the idea that we offer also remanufacturing opportunities. Let me come to industrial. Let me say upfront, the quarter clearly showed how important it is that we have this industrial business going forward. While the Automotive Technologies business sees a little bit of softening at the moment and some headwinds, industrial is rather the opposite. We see a continued positive trend. This is the first positive growth after five quarters of decline. It's driven by China and Asia Pacific. Americas, rather flat. Europe, still with positive momentum, but also in recovery mode. This, going forward, changes a little bit. You can always see that more sectors are in green and that we are growing in a broader manner across the board. The increased volume goes hand in hand with good cost control, and that has also led to the highest margin Industrial since 10 quarters. 11.9% is significantly better than in the first quarter 2020. We can't extrapolate on that margin because the quarter was so strong, but we are confident, and you saw it from the guidance for Industrial that we raised above 9% is a clear commitment that we are on track to achieve our midterm targets. Let me also here give two more slides with a little bit of color. I just spoke about the sectors. The recovery is normally a strong recovery. If it's broader, if it spans across products and sectors. Here are three examples. Off-road, where we are introducing, at the moment, new agricultural bearing solutions to the market. The industrial automation is a key area. This small linear motor drive allows us to gain orders and traction in the semiconductor industry in Asia Pacific. Power transmission, another classical sector for Schaeffler. Another area where we focus on our standard ball bearings is also adding to the positive momentum. Here we are in the market with a new ball bearing design with a highly competitive performance to cost ratio. All of that supports the confidence and the optimism. In Americas, next page 15, just a little bit deep dive. Americas, from our point of view, is on its way for more sustainable growth. We have the large programs initiated by the U.S. government. We see it across the sectors. Aerospace, that was really down, where we see increased order interest for the overhaul business. Renewable energies, large orders coming in for wind bearings. Very interesting. Also in the Americas, we are not standing still to further optimize our footprint. We have consolidated a smaller facility and also invested around $70 million over the last years in our main facility in Fort Mill. Made in the U.S. will enhance flexibility and availability. With this, let me come to page number 16, the famous page on cost discipline. You would normally expect this chart with the bars that tell you where are we with our headcount reduction. You remember, last time we showed you 9,200 people less since end of the year 2018. I decided here to give you some insight on this restructuring program announced in 2020. We see over the quarter a slight increase in headcount, 630 people. More or less volume driven by Automotive Technologies and Industrial. The bottom may have been reached, but take into account there is a new program coming that is not in the numbers yet. As I said before, the negotiations are largely completed. Most of the social plans are signed. Yesterday, we got very positive feedback from the final negotiations for another location. The program will be started in terms of execution in the next days. Negotiations are done. For a German situation like this, with significant number of locations, nine months negotiations, is nothing unusual. We are proud that we have been able to do this, on the one hand, in a very constructive manner, and on the other hand, without giving in on neither the headcount reduction or the overall net headcount reduction, the 4,400 that you may remember. Also the business case that we announced at the time is confirmed. The financial impact is unchanged, and these savings that you see here on the page will come in over time. That will be helpful also meeting our targets going forward. Next page is then on the capital side. Here, I can say we are very much focused on capital discipline as you know. On the other hand, we saw in the first quarter a low CapEx number, EUR 132, clearly also driven by the crisis. The CapEx ratio is definitely below the lower end that we normally expect. Reinvestment rate at 0.5. That is not a situation that will continue. You may recall we said around EUR 800 million CapEx for this year. How this will come in remains to be seen. It's vital for us that we continue to invest in the new areas. A deep dive into the reinvestment rate clearly shows that this idea of mature with little investment and new with high investment pays off, and over time, we should get back to the around 6% range CapEx ratio. You know the new E-motor plant, just as one of the examples. There is more to come in terms of footprint going forward, when the crisis comes to an end. Let me come to my last page before I hand over to Klaus. Just one word on sustainability. I am not going to spend much time here, but just want to leave you with the key message. We are progressing on our roadmap. It's a long race, and it's not going to be won on the first part of the race, but rather at the end. We remain very focused here, and very committed. We have our 2030 target out for production zero-carbon, and we are actively working on our scope three targets. There are many different initiatives. The sustainable site initiative tech is on track. Compensation is linked to sustainability, not only for board members and also more training, more awareness here helps a lot. It's a key challenge, but also for us, a key opportunity given our product offering. With this, I would close my first part and hand over to you, Klaus, for the financial results. Thanks, Klaus. On the top line, the revenue was up on a nominal basis 8.5%, including a negative FX impact of 2.7%. Without FX, growth was 11.2%. You also can see on the slide that we are sequentially down a bit as expected, but both fourth quarter and first quarter have been exceptionally good quarters. If you look at the lower right-hand side, you see the sales by region with a China share of 22%, which was brought up due to a growth in China of 57%. Also lead to an increase of the share, which was a year ago at around 16%, and that came together with also a significant margin improvement. Next page on gross profit. First of all, to the gross margin. You can see on the lower left-hand side that the gross margin increased by 290 basis points. The gross profit actually increased by 21%. That was driven by a couple of factors. I'll just quickly go through the bridge. Price was kind of normal in Automotive Technologies, actually less than in the prior year. On the other hand, in Automotive Aftermarket and industrial, there was a bit a negative change, specifically in industrial. However, there are price increases announced, which will then come into effect later in the year. Volume was the big driver. The volume column also includes a material part of the regional mix impact. The product mix was actually only negative as -2. That is due to the fact that we had a very strong growth in our traditional Automotive Technologies products, which fully compensated the fast growth in E-Mobility. On the production cost, the EUR 130, that comes mainly from Automotive Technologies, and shows the regression impact or the scaling impact from the higher volume. FX impact on gross margin was negative, this negative impact was, in this quarter, more than offset by hedging activities booked in other operating income. Next one, on the EBIT. Sorry, on the functional cost. Functional cost increased only slightly in the first quarter, clearly less than the sales increase. R&D costs also have been flat year-over-year, with a slight sequential increase, mainly due to increased project activity. Selling costs increased year-over-year due to higher volumes and the RKO ramp-up, which Klaus already mentioned. I will come back to that then also when we talk aftermarket. Higher logistic costs, outbound logistic costs, led to that increase, which we see here also sequentially. Admin are down year-over-year as a result of continued cost discipline. The sequential expense increase is coming from a lower impact of short-term work, compared to the fourth quarter, and higher spend, for example, in IT and digitalization. On the EBIT, the margin came up 480 basis points, which is a quite strong increase. On the other hand, on lower automotive tech volume and higher functional costs, we see a slight sequential decrease compared to the very strong fourth quarter. Next one on the Automotive Technologies business. The growth was strong with FX-adjusted 15.8%. Highest percentage-wise increase from E-Mobility, which is now presented in a new structure. Even in the old structure, you would have seen actually a bit higher growth. This is both good. On the absolute numbers, you see also that the traditional business, specifically the transmission business, was very strong, and in an absolute term, the biggest mover here. On the outperformance, it was mentioned already that the 1.8% outperformance which we had in the first quarter was held back by a negative outperformance in China, which was only due to a base effect in China, where in last year's quarter, the production dropped faster than our sales. Therefore, a year ago, we had a positive outperformance of more than 20% in China, and that was, if you want, a tough comp. If you look at the bridge, gross profit was the main lever for the improved EBIT, and that is driven from strong regional mix and a higher contribution from China, combined with cost discipline and excellent drop through. On the next page, you see the Automotive Aftermarket, where we had 4% FX-adjusted growth, double-digit growth in all regions, Europe with a decline. We had a heterogeneous picture in Europe, with also several countries also growing. If you look at the channel, you see that the growth was specifically strong in the independent aftermarket channel. This growth was still limited by product availability. On the profit bridge, you see a negative impact in gross profit of EUR 17 million, or 350 basis points, that was driven by higher internal supply cost, negative pricing, as I mentioned earlier, and also a provision for a customer bonus program in relation to REPXPERT. The selling expenses, which you see here year-over-year, with an increase of EUR 8 million, was materially coming from the AKO topic, so that was close to EUR 7 million from the EUR 8 million. Next one on industrial. You see that industrial showed growth FX adjusted of 3.9%. On the lower left-hand side, you see that now with industrial automation joining the club, now five sectors showed growth. Regionally, Greater China was growing strongest with 27%. That growth was driven from wind and power transmission. With regard to the profit bridge, gross profit impact was slightly negative despite of a positive volume impact, and that was due to FX in gross profit and also pricing. Functional costs have then been positive, and in the other column, you see then a significant impact from the FX hedging impacts, and therefore, overall, FX was not the driver for that profit improvement. It was more the increase in volume and lower functional costs. Next on EBIT. Here you see, first of all, that in the first quarter, we had only EUR 50 million in so-called special items. They have been related to a legal topic, and only to a minor part, restructuring expenses. The restructuring expenses, however, for the full year will be in a range of EUR 50 million-EUR 70 million. Financial result was EUR -34 million, which was better than prior year. The improvement and the impact in the last year came from the redemption option of the former high yield bond. Income taxes were increased year-over-year on positive earnings before tax. For the full year, we expect a tax rate of 28%-32%. On page 28, net income was positive EUR 235 million. EPS was positive. Schaeffler value-added decreased on a last 12 months basis. Klaus hinted already that, again, on a last 12 months basis adjusted, the ROCE was 12.5%. If you look just on the quarter, we had a very strong ROCE, also on a reported basis, and our midterm target of 12%-15% reported pre-tax stays intact. On the free cash flow. The free cash flow before M&A was EUR 130 million. That EUR 130 million includes cash out for restructuring of around EUR 150 million, which was around about EUR 100 million higher than a year ago. The EUR 150 million mainly was due to the voluntary severance scheme in Germany, which was launched in 2019. For the fiscal year 2021, we expect cash out of below EUR 350 million. From that scheme launched in 2019, this will be around EUR 130 million, and the remainder is coming materially from the program which we announced in September 2020. Net working capital outflow amounted to EUR 164 million. That was driven by higher inventories and receivables. CapEx decreased to EUR 130 million. We have confirmed our guidance of roughly EUR 800 million, which means that starting in the second quarter and then more pronounced in the second half year, we will see higher numbers. Finally, on the FCF conversion, free cash flow conversion ratio was 0.3. That was obviously impacted by the restructuring expenses. If you strip that out, you have a number which is clearly above 0.5. Finally, on the net debt. The net debt is now EUR 2.2 billion, came down quite a bit. Leverage ratio is at 1.1. The cash and cash equivalents are EUR 1.8 billion, with restricted cash of EUR 222 million, significantly lower than a year ago. With that, back to you, Klaus. Thank you, Klaus. I will finish the presentation with the outlook and some words on the market assumptions. Please go to 32. Here you have our triptych on with the three different divisions. Clearly, Automotive Technologies being the most important number. Here we have adjusted our market assumption for going forward slightly upwards. Just to recall, for the full year release, we said we are building our outlook on 80 million cars being produced, and that was at the time a 5 million discount to the IHS forecast as of February 2021. 80 million was the starting point. When you look today at the latest IHS estimates, you see a certain development. They were higher and then adjusted also in the April release. We have said we will remain cautious here, and we're not going to simply assume the number that IHS gives us. That was 83.5, but we still work with a 1.5 million cars and light vehicles produced discount versus the estimate to be on the safe side. If you translate this in year-over-year growth compared to 2020, then this is 10% growth. It was 7% before. You see from this assumption that the forecast, in particular in Automotive Technologies, is built on a still cautious outlook, that we will continue to review and very carefully observe. With that approach, we are factoring in the uncertainties due to the COVID situation that is clearly easing, at least here in Germany and in Europe, but also with the potential supply chain disruptions that are still possible. I do think that they will hopefully be temporary, but it's better to be on the safe side in these days than to be overly optimistic. In Automotive Aftermarket, again, there is not this IHS forecast that we could use. We're using world GDP, here we just remained at the same level as end of the year. In Industrial Production, as I said before, there is a positive development. The global industrial production is expected to recover and grow by 9%, previously 7%. That's also factored into our new guidance. On the next page, you have that comparison. You saw this also in the release. The above 17, above 7%, excuse me, above 7% becomes above 10%. We lifted the margin range by 1 percentage point up from six to eight to seven to nine, and the free cash flow from around EUR 100 to more than EUR 300, as already indicated before. On the divisional guidance, we made the following adjustments. The general logic for sales growth in Automotive Technologies stays. Outperformance 200-500 basis points, but with an improved market assumption for the LVP volumes 10%. Margin from more than 4.5% to more than 6%. Automotive Aftermarket 5%-7% becomes 6%-8%. The margin stays above 11.5%. For Industrial, both an adjustment on the growth side from 4%-6%- 7.9%. That's certainly a meaningful step. On the margin side, we improved from above 8.5% to above 9.5%. Again, we think that's a cautious outlook, the cautious approach, but it shows confidence that we will come out of the year 2021 in much better shape than in 2020. Let me finalize very quickly on 34. The top-line development was described. It will, from my point of view, further recover. Despite the headwinds, the earnings quality was exceptionally strong, and we will see that this will soften over the year. Again, the guidance range is a solid range, and free cash flow generation, always the most important figure for us, is robust despite the cash outflows. I think you see here that we are very much focused on this figure, because it drives value creation and also our own compensation. The restructuring program is additional support. It's progressing according to plan. I can say I'm very happy about what the teams here have achieved. It's a joint exercise by the whole executive board, clearly driven also by Mr. Schittenhelm and Mr. Ziegler, and they have done an exceptional job to get this lined up and also now negotiated. A very strong achievement from my point of view. I can also say, as soon as that is executed, we will revisit our footprints, our capacity allocation, our structures and see what else needs to be done. It's a continuous exercise in these days, and as part of our transformation. I already commented on the guidance, not more to say. I want to finish again by reiterating our relentless focus on execution. This is what is necessary. The team is fully committed to master the challenges ahead of us, and we are committed to deliver a continuously solid operating performance and strong cash flow. Last page. We have decided to be a little bit more active in terms of road shows and conferences. After this first quarter, you see four different days, followed then in June by two more events. We've also agreed that we will involve the colleagues here a little bit. Matthias will be there. Jochen Schröder will be there. Marc McGrath is going to help us. We think it's time for a little bit broader communication, and the colleagues deserve it. They are the ones that are driving the operational successes. In particular, Matthias has contributed greatly in the E-Mobility strategy and also in generating growth opportunities, but also harvesting our highly valuable mature business. That is it from my side. With that, I hand back to you, Renata, and to the operator for your questions. Thank you very much. Thank you very much, Mr. Rosenfeld. Thank you very much, Dr. Patzak. We now are open to start with the Q&A. Stuart, please go ahead. Thank you very much. Thank you, Renata. Ladies and gentlemen, at this time, we will begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star followed by one on your touchtone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star followed by two. If you're using speaker equipment today, please lift the handset before making selection. Anyone who has a question may press star followed by one at this time. One moment for the first question, please. First question is from the line of Edoardo Spina from HSBC. Please go ahead. Thank you very much. I have just a couple of questions. The first on the impact of the price increases on your cost for 2021 and then for the next few years. If you could clarify how company actions are impacted by the semiconductor shortage, if you buy directly much or if it's just a second derivative type of impact. Also how you think this tight supply chain situation would develop for the future. The second question is more about the midterm guidance. I guess that today maybe is not the best time to develop that too much. I was wondering if these supply chain situation is a factor in refraining from having higher guidance or for the future, or there are other elements that you would like to share at this time? Thank you very much. Maybe, Edoardo, I just start, and then I hand over to Klaus for the more factual things. If I understand you correctly, you ask about midterm targets. Let me say this is not the time to talk about midterm targets. We have announced them end of last year as part of our capital markets day. We are now through the first quarter. Again, we have not taken any steps here to discuss this. The midterm targets are midterm, and at the moment it's all about getting the year 2021 right. The guidance shows that. With this, I hand over to Klaus for the first question on the supply chain situation and the impact on the P&L. First of all, I think on the supply chain side, I would differentiate between the semi side and other raw material pieces, specifically on the steel side. On the semi side, this is more an indirect impact because it is an impact on our customer, mainly for us, which we are observing. Obviously, we expect also that this has an impact on our top line in the second quarter, but potentially also then in the second half, which is built already into our guidance. On the raw material prices, indeed, in the first quarter, we had no significant negative impact. I think it was just a high single-digit figure year-over-year. In the last year, we had, in general, a positive impact. For the full fiscal year 2021, we expect a negative impact. Probably have to differentiate also between gross and net impact. Gross impact, I would say, could be between 50 basis points and 100 basis points in margin. Obviously, we are trying to also pass a portion of that to our customers, and therefore the net impact might be a bit smaller. Again, also this headwind is included in our fiscal year 2021 guidance. Thank you very much. If I may have a very quick third question about the second quarter. Comparing to one of the German competitor, very large, they mentioned maybe the second quarter could be as low as 10% less than the first quarter, so sequential decline of maybe up to 10%. I was checking if you could share your thoughts on that. Congratulations for operating the guidance this year. It's been up. Edoardo, it's a good question, and it's always good to look to our sister company, but we have decided not to comment on the quarterly development. We have given you a new guidance for the full year, and let's see what the quarter is. Maybe Klaus can say some words on the current trading, and that's what we can say. A number in terms of how much it looks like versus previous year or this quarter would be not in line with what we agreed here. If you want to say something on the current trading, Klaus, maybe that helps you a little bit. First of all, I think we can say that April was a pretty strong month. In the latest days, I think it was getting a little bit weaker and that is also what we see here for May. In general, my expectation very broadly would be that I do not expect personally the second quarter will be higher than the first quarter, right? There will be a bit of an impact here. Again, has been built into our yearly guidance, as Klaus mentioned. Yeah. We have these easy comps, don't forget that. There will be record growth rates, that doesn't count. What counts is how it progresses, and Klaus has given you the indications. The next question is from the line of Sascha Gommel from Jefferies. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning. Thanks for taking my questions as well. The first one would actually be on your guidance. I just want to understand a little bit the moving parts, what happened. You gave a guidance in early March for the full year. Now you upgraded on the back of a very strong Q1. When I look, though, at the remainder of the year, the new guidance implies more or less on the margin side that you end up with what you've guided in March. Is it fair to assume it's basically you just upgrade on the back of Q1? Is there anything else that I'm missing? It's a fair question, and this is very much a balancing act. If this would be a V-shaped recovery where you just now say, "It's all over," and we go full speed ahead, then the guidance may have looked differently. Here, yes, we had a strong first quarter that helps for this step. Others have not upgraded their guidance. We also are very conscious of the potential headwinds that are there. As this is not symmetric, we said let's rather be also cautious here with going into this upgrade, and not overpromise something. I think Klaus has given the reasons. It's a variety of things that come together. You can't look at this like a mathematical exercise where someone said, "Okay, Q1 was better than expected, and we continue as for the rest of this year what we had before." It's a very thorough forecasting process that was behind this, that was finished at the beginning of this week. This also takes into account the different situations in the three different businesses. Don't forget, compared to others, this is not only Automotive Technologies. There's a slightly different situation there than in industrial. This is the end result of a, I think, very professional discussion that Klaus guided over the last days, that led to this result. Clearly, it was a cautious approach, with some sign of confidence that the year could also turn out in a better way. Appreciate that. My second question would be on electronics. I know you cannot comment on competitors, but a lot of competitors are talking about adding electronics content to their mechanical product. I think you've been talking about that in the past as well. I was just wondering if there's any update you can share with us today, if the thinking has changed or if you would accelerate any expansion into electronics. I think we have been careful what are we talking about. If we are talking about power electronics as part of the E-Mobility offerings, then that will clearly increase, because the need for E-Mobility solutions will increase over time. What that means for us in terms of our own production or sourcing, is a different question. If you then, again, use the mature and new business analogy, this is very much on the new side, also on the chassis side, while the classical products of Schaeffler, the components, are not so much affected by any semiconductors. Semiconductors is also not electronics. We need to be a little bit careful that this doesn't become too much a black and white aspect. We are not going to change our strategy in terms of what we want to do because of this headwind. As Klaus said, we are not so much affected like others, as we don't typically use so many parts. The share of our purchasing volume is more in the low single percentage numbers when you come to this, so the direct impact is definitely manageable. The indirect impact is the challenging one. That's more a question of how the supply chain normalizes. As I indicated, I think there is at the moment, a bullwhip effect that will balance out over time. At the moment, this is a big challenge and everyone is talking about it, whether it's in our direct conversations with customers or whether it's in the German Car Association, but it will normalize. That's also for sure. This question is from the line of Horst Schneider from Bank of America. Please go ahead. Thank you for taking also my questions. Good morning. Morning. The first question that I have that relates again to special items and restructuring. You had very little additional charges in Q1. Is it fair to assume that this is going to remain the case also in the next three quarters, so that all the restructuring charges by now have been booked and now you are really just more switching into execution mode? Is there more coming up on the back of the negotiations that you are doing at the moment? Then you thought on Slide 16, I think, you talk about the restructuring savings, the EUR 250 million-EUR 300 million, of which 90% will be realized already in 2023. I'm not sure if you have ever commented how much of the savings will materialize already in 2022. I think there will be savings already this year, so it would be great if you could quantify them. The other question that I had that was referring to M&A. I understand that you cannot comment on these market rumors on Bloomberg. Nevertheless, we see now that your leverage ratio has declined below 1.2 x, and I think your target is in the midterm plan, something like 1.2x- 1.5x leverage ratio, therefore, the flexibility on M&A is clearly increasing for you as a group. I don't know. I want to understand how should we think about this leverage ratio. You really want to stay tied into that? Temporarily, you can also go past that level given that the business situation is improving? Put it in other words, what is the maximum level of net debt that you want to have on your balance sheet? Thank you. Well, Horst, I understand your questions. Let me comment and start with the first one, with the last one, and then Klaus can add to this. I can again confirm that our M&A strategy is a strategy that is clearly focused on both on acquisitions, smaller acquisitions that adds both strategically but also technologically. When we outlined the midterm targets, we said 1.2- 1.7, including such a strategy without knowing what the actual target would look like. Let me also say this with a little smile. There are situations in life where we all have learned never say never. And I can't say more on this. Generally, we can say that the situation on the right end of the balance sheet has dramatically improved over the years. We have a very solid liquidity position. We have a good net debt leverage ratio that is now, at the moment, slightly below the target. That gives us ample room to do the right things. Please understand, we're not going to discuss at this call our firepower going forward. In terms of the restructuring numbers, what you have on this sheet on page 16 is just a copy of what we shared with you on the 10th of September. That were the estimated savings, and we promised there EUR 250-EUR 300 for the year, for the full run rate effect, and said 90% of that should be in 2023. Again, negotiations are not completely finished, and therefore, for this Q1, we can't at the moment say more than we are well on track to finalize and also confirm the business case behind it. How it will then unfold in the year 2023 remains to be seen. Maybe something, Renata, for a subsequent call, if we have all the details together. Restructuring charge, Klaus, you want to add there? Maybe you want to add some color for my third question. Yeah, I'm happy to. Again, first quarter restructuring expenses have been low, a single-digit amount. I mentioned already that restructuring expenses for the year 2021 will be between EUR 50 million and EUR 70 million. That comes to what we have already accrued in fiscal year 2020, which was EUR 580 million. I would say for 2022, 2023, there would be another EUR 50 million. That gives you then the around EUR 700 million, what we mentioned already in September. That is fully as planned. Again, on the savings. We said this for 2023, 90% of EUR 250 million-EUR 300 million so far. For 2022, it will be a significantly lower amount. I would rather guess right now a number of around about EUR 100 million, yeah? Maybe just to add one more sentence on the net debt situation. If you look at this page that Klaus explained, 30, you see that the last 12 months EBITDA before special items is around EUR 2 billion. That includes still a weak second quarter 2020. If you just go forward, look forward for one quarter, if that falls off, I think you cannot assume that our second quarter 2021 will be equally bad. The underlying LTM number will go up. That gives, again, further cushion in terms of the net debt leverage ratio going forward. On the other hand, we paid dividend in the second quarter. That typically doesn't help the liquidity position. I think we are in a fortunate position here when you think about our net debt situation. Just small follow-up on this Q2 issue. When you said, on Edoardo's question, that Q2 going to be below Q1 in terms of sales, you meant the total group, not just Auto Tech, right? I think that's what was indicated. We said Q1 was an exceptionally strong quarter. Yeah. We now need to see how this unfolds. I think what Klaus said was for the full group. All right. Okay. The next question is from the line of Akshat Kacker from JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Thank you. Akshat from JP Morgan. Three from my side, please. The first one on the Industrial business. Can you just take a step back and please talk about your growth aspirations in Industrial, in Americas in general, and how does your market positioning look right now versus competitors there, and how does the business overall stand versus your positioning in other markets like Europe and Asia? The second one is on auto margins. I understand the cautiousness in terms of the full year outlook. Maybe to just get some confidence and visibility into the second quarter, can you help us if, in thinking, if you can maintain a more than 6% margin target in a challenging Q2 otherwise? The third one on order intake for E-Mobility. Can you just remind us where do we stand in the first quarter, and how do you expect this to evolve for the remaining 2021? Thank you. Let me start with the last one. We have decided to publish order intake with the necessary details on a half-year basis. I can only tentatively say the order intake in the Automotive Tech division was strong in the first quarter. In particular, in E-Mobility. I just mentioned one of the projects, that was this truck project, that was a larger three-digit million order intake. Please understand, I can't give you more than that at the moment. We feel good about the development there. Again, the number of requests, the number of acquisition project is rising, what is a sign that our contribution is clearly recognized. In terms of the auto margin. Again, we have said we don't give any quarterly guidance now, and I would refrain from any more here than we are very much focused on the one hand, manage the potential growth, maintaining the good momentum in terms of profitability on the mature side. I can't give you any more information on what the second quarter will look like. Klaus gave the flavor in terms of current trading, therefore the 6% remains an annual floor. Here we are clearly, fully committed to make that. Don't forget, this restructuring program will help both bigger divisions, Automotive Technologies and Industrial going forward, probably 50/50. That was the indication from September. In terms of Industrial, I didn't really understood whether that was a question regarding the overall business or whether you related it to a sector or to a region. Yes. It was a sectorial question? I think it was U.S., yeah. U.S.? Okay. Sorry, I didn't got that. My apologies. On the U.S. side, I do believe that the U.S. is at the beginning of a stronger recovery in industrial. On the one hand, driven by the governmental support. We don't have a Made in the U.S.A. logic at the moment, but it's obvious to me that the U.S. will recover in that area stronger than we think. That's why we're saying, as I indicated also on the page, there is definitely potential for us to grow on the industrial side. So far we have been, rather, in certain areas, a niche player, but distribution, for example, in the U.S. is strong. Wind offers opportunities. Our classical business in bearings is clearly competitive. We think that will be a support going forward in the year 2021, but also in the following years. Thank you. You're welcome. Next question is from the line of Christoph Laskawi from Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. A lot of them have been answered already, so thank you for that. Just to follow up on the current trading. I know you don't want to comment too much in detail, but could you comment on the product mix that you are seeing into Q2? Is it essentially unchanged from Q1 or are specific product groups accelerating more than others? Also on the regional mix and the potential margin impact into the quarter. Would you say that could be weakening or also essentially unchanged? Just as a reminder, in terms of the cost ramp up, when hopefully soon operations will normalize from the volatility of the semi shortage. Do you expect a lot of costs to pick up again when you revamp the activities or are you essentially now coming close to a normalized cost run rate after the restructuring? Maybe I start with the cost side. Don't forget, if you look at the year 2020, there was a meaningful impact from Kurzarbeit in Germany in that. That's more than EUR 100 million with phasing where the biggest impact was in Q2. That would more or less go away in 2021. That's one of the elements. We said there are several elements. On the other hand, we have continued savings. We still think that we will not fly as much as we have ever flown before. Klaus said we will invest in the digitalization. That's not only CapEx, this is also OpEx. We will stay very focused on build-up of unnecessary jobs. On the other hand, there will be volume increases because some of the factories are working at capacity level. It's not an easy answer here. There are several drivers that need to be managed carefully. What I can say again and confirm, this is all part of the guidance and included in this, I think, very professional forecasting exercise that Klaus organized. On the product mix, Klaus, would you help me there? I think first of all, as I think also highlighted already, we expect in the Industrial business, good momentum, continued good momentum. We also would expect that Automotive Aftermarket from the top line has good momentum. That's clearly, I think, positive. I would not see here any negative impact. Obviously, Automotive Aftermarket is still kind of held back by the inventory situation. We will also utilize if in Automotive Technologies there would be a temporary weakness, we can utilize that in order to build inventories, which we then immediately can use in the a ftermarket or later than also in Automotive Technologies when the semi topic will clear. On the current trading, what I mentioned already that April was strong, specifically in Europe, basically on the level of January and February, but was not on the level of March, right? That's what I can say here. We also see in the April months that there was quite a visible impact in the United States, on the return mix side. We expect that to continue also into May and also potentially into June. Greater China, the impact was rather limited. I would say there was a first negative influence from the semi topic in April, right? Asia, specifically India, remains to be seen. Obviously, we are very cautious on that situation there. Thank you. Just one follow-up, if I may. Leaving aside semis, because you don't source them too much, are there any, either raw mats or parts, where you would fear a shortage or a very tight supply in the coming months? Leaving aside the price increases that we've seen anyways. Some companies will be a bit worried about steel, for example. Well, again, you all know that steel is our main material that we use, or to be more precise, it's not only raw material, it's also everything that is steel-related, take turned rings. I would answer the question, in our business over the cycle, we always have situations where there is tension in the supply chain. At the moment it's, I would say, rather at the high end, but we're used to manage this. There's always a question of, do we get the volume? What is important for us, we don't want to create a situation where a customer can't be delivered. On the other hand, there's a price element. We are well experienced how to manage this, particularly on the steel side. It's not easy these days, but I'm optimist. I think we'll get out of this soon. There's nothing that I can say that is going to be now the next one after the chips have rebalanced. There are clearly, the world has changed. The supply chain challenges are high. It's all the question of how you deal with that. Maybe to finish off the whole conference, I think this quarter shows that we are in good shape. The hard training of the last quarters has clearly helped us, and we are confident that we will cope with the challenges ahead of us and bring this company forward. Great. Thank you. You're welcome. There are no further questions at this time. I would like to hand back to Mr. Rosenfeld for closing comments. Please go ahead. Well, ladies and gentlemen, I just made my closing comments. Thank you very much for listening. You see the table with the events that are ahead of us. We thank you for listening and following the Schaeffler Group. Again, I don't want to repeat myself. We are optimistic, but also cautious at the same time, and we are clearly committed to further create value and execute, as we promise. With that, thank you very much, and we'll all see you soon, at the latest in our Q2 earnings call. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, the conference is now concluded and you may disconnect your telephone. Thank you for joining, and have a pleasant day.