Good morning, and thank you for joining us for Sabadell results presentation for the first quarter of 2021. My name is Lluc Sas. I'm the Head of Shareholders and Investor Relations. Presenting today are our CEO, César González-Bueno, and CFO, Leopoldo Alvear. This quarter, we plan to spend around 30 minutes presenting our results, then we will answer your questions for an additional 20, 30 minutes. In today's presentation, our CEO will start by going through the key developments of the quarter before providing some details on the most significant topics. Our CFO will then discuss financial results, asset quality, liquidity, and capital before our CEO concludes with some brief closing remarks. I will now hand over to César González-Bueno to kick off our presentation. Thank you, Lluc. It's a pleasure to be here with you today in my first quarterly results presentation with Sabadell. I am very satisfied to do it hand-on-hand with Leo Alvear. We believe it is important to kick off together this new exciting project. Before going into the details of the presentation, I would like to share with you some of my first impressions about the bank. As expected, my first objective was getting to know the bank, including its people, its numbers, and a sample of its clients. I also wanted to gain a good understanding of what we do well and what needs more focus. My preliminary conclusions are very simple. First, our people are good. They have the will and the skill. The latest evolution of the bank has left them with an eagerness to perform, to recover the shine we used to have when we were a good performer. The positive team's attitude, it's making a big difference. We have gone through a lot of change at Sabadell and have increased the focus and accountability. I have found the team very welcoming to these substantial changes. Leo will talk today about the book and the risk profile of the bank. As an appetizer, I can share that we have found no surprises, and that after the decisive actions taken in Q4 last year, our balance sheet profile is in line with our peers. Furthermore, we believe it's a good platform for the developments of our strategic plan. About the quality of the franchise in Spain, a few remarks. In retail, there is room for improvement, especially in costs. In SMEs, there is an opportunity to strengthen even further the advantage we have, leveraging on good and lasting client relationships while we keep managing credit risk properly. Corporate Banking in Spain is a sound and profitable business. In our corporate foreign activities, nevertheless, we are implementing a more disciplined capital management. TSB, as we will see today, is improving and makes us optimistic for the future. All of this will be covered in more detail during the Strategy Day in May. Today, we want to focus on Q1 results, so please, let's move on to the presentation. Moving on to slide four, we highlight the key developments during the first quarter. Firstly, we have significantly improved our governance. Secondly, we have a new organizational structure. It is aligned with what will be our future strategy. Our franchise commercial performance in the quarter has been strong, both in Spain and in the U.K. TSB has contributed positively to the group. This is good news and a sign of TSB's turnaround. Net profit stands at EUR 73 million, and we expect that it will benefit from NII tailwinds and cost savings from second quarter. I will now develop each of these five highlights in more detail. On slide five, we show how we have further strengthened our corporate governance to fully align with international best practices. We currently have a non-Executive Chairman, an Executive CEO, and a Lead Independent Director. There has been a thorough review of the committees of the board, their scope and functions, as well as its members. Sustainability is part of Banco Sabadell's purpose and business strategy, and we have placed it among our main objectives. Moving on to slide six. We have made significant changes to the bank structure in order to align it with a new strategy. We have now divided Spain into three business units, Retail Banking, Business Banking, and Corporate Banking. The Retail Banking has now a clear mandate to improve its processes, its products, and services. This is a priority going forward. In order to do so efficiently and in a focused manner, the Retail Banking unit is structured around products to enhance focus. It is led by Miguel Montes, with the support of Jorge Rodríguez, to whom all the products will report. Business Banking is the unit which contributes the most to the bank profitability. This is where Sabadell holds a leading position in the Spanish market. The aim is to do more and better of the same. This business unit is structured into segments, ranging from self-employed to large enterprises, and is led by Carlos Ventura. Carlos also has the overall responsibility of the branch network in Spain. This unity of command guarantees the continuity of the commercial momentum. The Corporate Banking unit in Spain is profitable and shows solid returns. This division is structured into customer units, specialized by sectors to serve large corporations, and it also has units for specialized products, such as structured finance, DCM, treasury, or brokerage, which serve both corporate clients, but also the middle market. Corporate Banking will continue to be led by Jose Nieto. I think the new organization in Spain fosters accountability in each business unit, which comes together with their empowerment. It provides a greater focus on customer needs, speeding up the transformation of the bank. It is important to point out, despite the significant reorganization, the new structure minimizes change-related risks. It does so by preserving the unity of the branch network management. Also, we haven't impacted the teams in charge of the IT back end. We have also maintained the second and third lines of defense, and furthermore, the risk management teams have remained in their current structure while reinforcing their specialization. Moving on to commercial activity on slide seven, I would like to highlight that the recent performance of the lending book has been very dynamic, growing by 3.4% and 5.9% on a quarterly and annual basis, respectively. This performance is especially driven by TSB, where mortgage lending is growing rapidly. In Spain, activity is now picking up from the subdued levels of January and February, which were caused by COVID-19 restrictions, along with Storm Filomena, the cyclone that affected Madrid and other geographies. Consequently, as you can see on the right-hand side of the slide, performing loan growth is mostly back-loaded in the quarter, suggesting that we will see the benefit in NII over the coming quarters. In the following slides, we take a closer look at our commercial performance. Starting with Spain in slide eight, I would like to highlight that in March, we recorded the best monthly mortgage lending performance in Sabadell's history. On the other hand, there was a decline in consumer lending origination in the quarter, driven by lower demand, along with a lower risk appetite at this time for this type of lending. Moving on to slide nine, we can see that new production of protection insurance keeps growing, driven by the new flow of mortgages lending, and by the recent partnerships with Sanitas in healthcare insurance. Regarding mutual funds, there was a large volume of net subscriptions in the quarter, supported by our partnership with Amundi. In terms of assets under management, we've had the best first quarter in the last four years. In slide number 10, we can see that cards turnover fell on the quarter due to seasonality. In our case, turnaround is also being affected by a lower usage of our corporate cards, which have a higher weight in our mix than in the market. Payments at point of sale were also affected by seasonality in the quarter. Following the general trend of the market, our turnover through retailer payment services at point of sale is still affected by lower inflows of tourists in Spain. Having said that, as long as restrictions are lifted and the economy recovers, we should see a gradual improvement of these revenue streams. In slide 11, regarding new lending to companies and self-employed, there has been a high growth rate in the quarter, especially in the large enterprise and public sector. Furthermore, monthly origination has improved through the quarter, as you can see when observing the monthly evolution of new lending. It is important to note that this growth has been observed despite the slowdown in the new ICO guaranteed loans. Moving on to slide 12. Current macroeconomic expectations in the U.K. are improving as we are all observing. TSB's commercial activity keeps showing good momentum, and our franchise recorded its best-ever mortgage lending origination in Q1, beating the record achieved in the previous quarter. Looking at the unsecured lending portfolio, there has been a decline in the new production as a result of the bank's lower appetite for this kind of lending. Let's now move to slide 13. TSB's profit-making, due to an improvement of income and a reduction of costs, together with a reduction of cost of risk. Restructuring is one year ahead of plan, and in the slide, you can see its main figures for the quarter. In Q1, around 70 branches have been closed, and 352 FTEs have left the bank. The good commercial momentum along with the efficiency measures implemented and the improved macroeconomic outlook, make the future look more promising for our U.K. franchise. Finally, on slide 14, coming back to the group, let me highlight the main drivers of this quarter's result. As expected, in terms of core banking revenues and costs, these lines have shown a weaker performance this quarter. Leo will cover this later. However, we expect this trend to revert from Q2 onwards, driven by the NII tailwinds and the cost savings from the efficiency plan in Spain. On provisions, we have started to see a lower cost of risk, which is now at 69 basis points compared to 86 basis points last year. Overall, this quarter, we reached a net profit of EUR 73 million, with TSB contributing, although marginally, and our fully loaded CET1 ratio stood at 12%. With that, I hand over to Leo. Thank you, César. Good morning, everyone. Let me start by saying that it's a pleasure to get back in touch with all of you, those who already know me from a previous role, and those whom I haven't had yet the pleasure. I'm very excited to have joined this project, for I believe it's a very solid franchise to which I think I can contribute with my previous experience in the sector. So far, I've only been 60 days in the job. As a matter of fact, 40 working days. I spent most of my time here in Barcelona, among other things, going through the bank's balance sheet. I believe that as we will see later, there are no major issues, and therefore, the bank is aligned with market standards. As C é sar mentioned, I'm also personally encouraged by the strong financial performance of the bank in the first quarter. The capital position is stabilized at 12% CET1 ratio, showing a benchmark MDA buffer of above 360 basic points. TSB has become a positive earnings contributor to the group and is showing strong commercial momentum. The profitability in Spain is set to accelerate in the coming quarters on the back of a strong commercial activity and cost savings derived from the restructuring program, which has been successfully executed in Q1. In any case, I look forward to providing you with further details on the financial opportunity in our upcoming Strategic Day. Well, I'm already talking too much, as always. Let's focus on the important issues today, which are regarding the quarter. Let me start by our quarterly results, where we have recorded a net profit of EUR 73 million at group level. As César mentioned before, I believe it's important to highlight that TSB is back to profitability. Let's now go through the different items of the P&L in more detail. Moving to slide 17, group net interest income decreased in the quarter by 2.4%. On the top right-hand side, you can see the bridge of the NII evolution in the quarter. The main positive impacts have been higher volumes, as well as the appreciation of the sterling. While the factors that contributed to reducing NII have been lower interest rates, fewer calendar days in the quarter, lower ALCO portfolio contribution after Q4 disposals. For comparison purposes, a positive one-off recorded and disclosed in the previous quarter. In any case, after last year's evolution on the sector, it's good news, for me at least, that the customer spread has remained stable in the quarter. As a matter of fact, one basic point up. As for the group's net interest margin, the slight decline QOQ, it's mostly explained by lower contribution of the ALCO portfolio. However, it's important to note that we expect this to be the lowest NII quarter for the year. Looking forward, there are some tailwinds that will more than offset the pressure coming from lower rates and shall, therefore, increase the NII in the coming quarters. Those will be, on the one hand, TLTRO III, as we drew an additional EUR 5 billion in the latest auction at the end of March, higher loan volumes as the quarterly loan growth was backloaded, as César mentioned before, and therefore, has not yet accrued interest in full. Finally, savings from wholesale funding maturities, mainly explained by an expensive sub-debt that will be called in May at TSB. Leaving the NII line to one side and moving on to fees. When comparing year-on-year, fees decreased by 2.2% or 2.4% on a quarter-on-quarter basis. Nevertheless, I believe it's interesting reviewing the different lines. On a year-on-year basis, all fees increased by asset management. In this line, it's important to remember that Q1 2020 numbers include EUR 60 million of fees related to Sabadell Asset Management before its disposal to Amundi. The good news, in my opinion, is that we have already recovered five of those EUR 60 million, driven by the good performance of assets under management in the quarter. QOQ, all fees have been impacted by this low commercial activity in January and February. As per the asset management line, it's worth considering that Q4's figures were positively impacted by seasonality due to success fees based on performance of funds and insurance businesses. Those fees amounted to EUR 13 million in Q4. If we factor them in, asset management would have been up QOQ by EUR 8 million or over 10%. As you can also see at the bottom right, at the beginning of the quarter, fees were impacted by lower customer activity, as they remain constrained by the lockdown measures put in place to tackle COVID-19, as well as by the severe weather and storms that hit the country. In any case, fees recovered in February and, in my opinion, outperformed in March, primarily in services as economic activity recovered over the quarter, but also in assets under management as a result of a strong net inflow in mutual funds that César showed before and the buoyant capital markets. Moving on, looking at the cost line. Total cost declined year-on-year by 1.2%, basically due to the restructuring plan in TSB, which has led to a headcount reduction and therefore lower general expenses. The quarterly comparison is a little bit more complicated due to all the extraordinaries that were booked in Q4. On the one hand, disclosed non-recurrent costs related to the announced efficiency plan, EUR 332 million, but also some extraordinary cost savings reported last quarter, related to lower than expected personal costs in Spain, explained by the renewal of the collective bargaining agreement, which amounted to EUR 23 million. As per the quarter, the main event has been the successful execution of the efficiency plan, which has entailed an 11% headcount reduction, mostly completed at the end of March, and carried out without affecting commercial activity, as it was explained before at the beginning of the presentation. Therefore, we shall start seeing the benefit of the gross cost savings, which we already disclosed were around EUR 140 million per year from second quarter onwards. In slide 20, the group's credit cost of risk ended the quarter at 69 basic points, below the 86 basic points reported in 2020. On a QOQ basis, total group credit provisions, excluding those taken to cover the NPL disposals in Q4, were down by roughly EUR 50 million. This is a result, as we were expecting, of lower credit provisions ex-TSB. It is also worth noting that TSB's QOQ comparison is impacted by the release of provisions reported last quarter, which came, as you might remember, as a result of the better macroeconomic outlook for the U.K. Looking at the top right-hand side, you can find the evolution of total provisions and costs, which amounted to EUR 354 million in the quarter. Starting from the left, we accounted for EUR 281 million of NPL credit provisions, EUR 12 million of provision charges on foreclosed assets, whereas costs related to the management of NPAs have been EUR 43 million. Finally, we booked EUR 18 million related to other provisions, mainly litigations. In the following section of the presentation, we will review the asset quality dynamics, the liquidity, and the solvency. Let me start with asset quality. As I will explain with more detail, following the action taken in Q4 and Q1, including loan reclassifications, old vintage NPA disposals, or one-off provisions, we can conclude after a review that we have not found anything out of the ordinary in terms of asset quality standards. In other words, our view is that Sabadell is exposed to similar asset quality themes than those being faced by the Spanish financial institutions and, well, quite frankly, by most of the European banking system. Getting into details. Beginning with payment holidays, it's worth mentioning that circa 38% have already expired, and on average, they have expired over four months ago. EUR 2 billion are currently outstanding, mostly mortgages, as you can see, and they're due to perish in the coming quarters, especially, obviously, in Q2 because of the ending of the moratoria of mortgages. Very few consumer finance still existing. In terms of ICO government-guaranteed loans, to date we have granted EUR 12.5 billion, for which the state provides with a guarantee of over 75%. In Q1, we have granted more than EUR 650 million, as it is shown on the slide, most of the maturities are well beyond 2023. Moving now to slide 23. As explained earlier, we've carried out a review of the bank's balance sheet. We would like to share with you some comparisons. Our NPL ratio at group level stands at 3.7%. I believe it's important to mention that half of the current NPL portfolios are classified as unlikely to pay. They have not yet failed to pay over 90 days. As you can see on the right-hand side, our NPL ratio in Spain is well in line with our peers, standing at 4.3%, while the Spanish sector, as per Banco de España data, is slightly above at 4.5%. Finally, we have total provisions that cover 56.4% of our NPLs, while Stage 2 and 3 loans represent 11.1% of the book. In slide 24, we have deep dived into the Pillar 3 reports in order to try to show some more details of the profile of our non-performing exposures, but also compare them with our peers' shape. We're showing data as of group exposures, as this is the data that you can find in our Pillar 3 reports, and we're also showing data as of Sabadell ex-TSB in order to compare more accurately with our Spanish peers. On the left-hand side, you can see the level of both provisions and guarantees behind our NPEs. At group level, if we add the amount of provisions plus the guarantees, 88% of the portfolio is covered, while on an ex-TSB perimeter, this amounts to 86%. This is very much in line with our peers' data, which stands at 88%. Another analysis, which I find particularly interesting, can be found looking at the vintage of the NPEs. This is looking at how long they have been past due. We can see on the right-hand side of the slide, based again on Pillar 3 statistics, that 74% of our stock ex-TSB has a vintage of less than two years past due, which compares to only 59% of the sector. In other words, we have a portfolio which is similarly secured to the ones of our peers, taking into account both provisions and guarantees, but younger after all the old vintage NPL disposals executed in Q4, which, as you know, are always those which higher coverage. Moving on to slide 25. In terms of foreclosed assets, I think the picture here is very clear. We have a much lower exposure versus our peers, approximately half, 1.1% versus 2.1%. 73% of our foreclosed assets have been repossessed in the last four years. Finally, but not less important, we have a better mix. 95% of our foreclosed assets are finished buildings, compared with a 57% average for our peers. In slide 26, we show both the gross and the net NPA ratio, which as you can see, are very much in line with our peers. When talking about gross NPA ratio, ours stands at 5.3% ex-TSB, which is slightly below, therefore a little bit better than our peers average at 5.4%. Our net NPA ratio stands at 2.5%, slightly above our peers average at 2.3%. In slide 27, moving to analyze the net inflows of NPLs for the quarter, it's worth to review the evolution of the Group ex-TSB and TSB separately. At the end of the quarter, NPLs ex-TSB classified as unlikely to pay, represented roughly 60% of the new NPL gross inflows. When we focus on the net inflows at the right-hand side of the slide, there has been a reduction of EUR 9 million of NPLs classified as past due and older than 90 days. While we have seen an increase in NPLs classified as unlikely to pay, mainly due to a single name. Therefore, in general terms, the underlying evolution that we are seeing this quarter has been most likely even a little bit better than what we were expecting on an organic basis. At TSB, there have been a few changes. Following the adaptation of the revised IRB models for the secured portfolio, subsequently, the change in default classification, there has been a one-off increase in the Stage 3 population of circa EUR 190 million related to interest-only mortgages. In any case, it's important to highlight that these mortgages were previously classified in Stage 2, and therefore, its lifetime expected credit loss was already covered. Consequently, this change in classification has not impacted the P&L. This change, in any case, is aligned with U.K.'s best practice of migrating past term interest-only mortgages to a Stage 3 when adopting the new definition of default. Turning now to slide 28, the group once again ended the quarter with a strong liquidity position. This is reflected in an LCR well above 200%, EUR 50 billion of high-quality liquid assets, or our loan to deposit, which ended the quarter at 98%. The main events in the quarter have been an additional drawing of EUR 5 billion from the TLTRO in March, as we are fully confident that we will meet the TLTRO III net lending target. Moving on to capital in the following slide, we show the evolution of the group CET1 ratio in the first quarter. The fully loaded CET1 stands at 11.96%. This is having slightly decreased six basic points QOQ. Organic capital generation is the main positive impact, adding 10 basic points to the ratio. It's worth mentioning that accrual of 27% of cash dividend payout has been deducted from capital, as according to regulation, as you all know, dividends must be accrued at least at three years average. This has been an impact of - 3 basic points for the quarter. On top of this, we had other impacts, such as the fair value adjustments from the fixed income portfolio, as the yield curves steepened over the quarter, or the RWA inflation driven by the strong volume growth that we had, especially in the month of March, as César explained before. After adding 42 basic points from the IFRS 9 transitional adjustment, the phase-in ratio stands at 12.38%. All these elements, together with the Tier 2 bonds and the AT1s, bring our total fully loaded capital ratio to 16.6%. Finally, our MDA buffer stands at 366 basic points above our total capital requirement of 13%. Finally, regarding our MREL requirement, it is worth highlighting that we are already compliant with the new requirements that are based on both risk-weighted assets and leverage ratio exposure. Main events of the quarter have been the issuance of EUR 500 million of Tier 2 in January and another EUR 500 million of AT1 in March. With this, let me hand it over to César for the conclusion of our presentation today. Thank you, Leo. We've come to the end of the presentation of the Q1 results. Before going into the Q&A, allow me just a couple of considerations. The Investor's Day will take place on the 28th of May. Many steps of the implementation of the new strategy have already been taken. The new organization of the bank and the new organizational governance and the new organizational structure are key pillars for the deployment of the transformation that we envision for the bank and the first steps of the journey. Quite a few other actions have been taken already. Just as an example, the new management objectives have shifted their emphasis from business volumes to profitability and return on capital. The review we have undertaken of the balance sheet and the overall situation of the bank give us confidence that the starting position, generally in line with the market, is an adequate platform on which we can develop our plans. We look forward to seeing you on the 28th. Please save the date. With that, I will now hand it over to Lluc to kick off our Q&A. Thank you, C é sar. We will now begin the Q&A session. As we only have a limited amount of time available, I would kindly ask to limit the number of questions to no more than two. Operator, could you open the line for the first question, please? Thank you. The first question comes from the line from Britta Schmidt, Autonomous Research. Please go ahead. Hi there, nice to talk to you this morning. I have got three quick questions, please. The first one is on restructuring costs. Are there still any pending restructuring costs on the TSB side that we need to include in the future? You alluded to potential further cost restructuring. Could you describe to us any thoughts on how to fund future cost restructuring plans? What stance would you take regarding the capital management there? The second one is, could you elaborate a bit on where you are regarding the benchmark lending targets? Maybe you can give us some numbers there on where the portfolio stands versus the target. Lastly, on capital, are there any further regulatory headwinds that we should bear in mind from here going forward? Thank you. Okay. Let me just give a high view, and then I will pass it on to Leo. On the restructuring cost of what is planned today for the U.K., there is a very limited amount pending. In further costs and further restructuring, I think we will give you a better view in the strategy day. On regulatory headwinds, we do not see anything significant this year, and we are estimating around 15 basis points from EBA guidelines only for 2022. Please, Leo, if you can further comment. Sure. Starting with the TSB restructuring, yes, I think we disclosed last year that there was still pending GBP 30 million to be booked this year. We've covered a fourth of that in the first quarter, just didn't show any more extraordinary. It's included in the EUR 200 million of costs from TSB. A reminder, this is 3/4 of this GBP 30 million will be booked in the coming three quarters. As per the benchmark, yeah, we're well ahead. I think we are over EUR 1 billion on top of the benchmark. We are very confident that we will address this issue with no problem at year-end. Moreover, looking at how volumes are evolving in the first few months of the quarter. That's basically the reason why we went and withdrew an additional EUR 5 billion in the March's auction. Finally, on capital headwinds, well, it's a pleasure to say that we're not expecting any more this year. All of them were booked last year, including the treatment low default portfolio and new definition of default. No surprises for this year. The only thing I have in the pipeline, if you wish, it's EBA guidelines, which will come from 2022 onwards. It's not material. We're talking about 15 basis points in 2022, which, yeah, we will work to offset it with other actions. Thank you, Britta. Can we move on to next question, please? Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Ignacio Ulargui from Exane BNP Paribas. Go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thanks for taking my questions. I just have two quick questions. One is, if you could give us some more color on the loan growth in the quarter. I've seen there has been a lot of growth in the large corporates and public sector portfolios. Just to get a bit of a sense of how that would, sort of like, whether that's a strategy or a bit of an opportunistic take in the quarter. Secondly, very nitty-gritty question, there was a very huge increase in equity method and dividends. Could you just elaborate a bit on what should we expect in the future, what was that in the quarter? Thank you. Yeah. On the first one, on the corporate and public sector growth, I think we are very comfortable growing there in this period. It's a place where the numbers and when the asset quality can be much better tested, and we were happy to grow on that side. I pass on the equity method question on to Leo. Sure. If I can add on the evolution of the loan growth for the quarter, I think we are pretty satisfied to see that we've grown all over different sectors, and segments, sorry. Mortgages are up slightly, but they're up QO Q and certainly year on year. We have corporates, large corporates, being up 2.2% on the quarter and 0.6% on year-on-year basis, but also SMEs, which are growing 2.8% also in the quarter. I think it's been pretty stable all across the book that we've seen good demand from our clients, and therefore, we've been able to grow the books. Finally, going into the equity method. This is a one-off, and it's due to an update valuation of some companies that are accounted through equity method in our venture capital, in Banco Sabadell Venture Capital. This is according to IAS 28, which allows to value the interest of some subsidiaries at fair value through profit and loss. This has been obviously reviewed by our auditor, and no, we're not expecting any further impacts through the coming quarters. Thank you, Nacio. Operator, could you connect the next caller, please? Thank you. Next question is from the line of Maksym Mishyn from JB Capital. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning, welcome, C é sar and Leopoldo. Thanks for presentation and taking my questions. I just have one on TSB. Previously, the bank was considering potential disposal of TSB, now you seem to have changed your mind. I wanted to ask you what has changed in your view for the bank, whether you would again consider potential disposal if someone offers the right price. Thanks. I think the guidance that we are giving very clearly today is that we will not initiate, in the near term, any corporate transaction, neither on TSB nor Mexico. The reason, specifically on TSB, is quite simple. I think I've had the pleasure and the luxury to sit in the board of TSB for the last year, for a year. The assessment of the quality of the franchise has made the board to reconsider any potential disposal at this point in time. We are confident of the turnaround. We trust the management. We want to give continuity to the plans that are being developed there. In reality, we feel confident that there is much more value to come from this franchise. This was confirmed, the decision was made previously, certainly, the results of the Q1 confirm that line. This is a message also that we are not, at this point in time, looking for any interest in the franchise. We just want to support it and see it grow to its potential. Okay. Let's move on to next question, please. Thank you. Next question comes from the line of Andrea Filtri from Mediobanca. Please go ahead. Yes. Thank you very much. Two questions. One, if you could please elaborate a little bit around the material increase in your risk-weighted assets QO Q, despite loans being fairly flat. The second on the healthy growth in deposits, if we should expect any change in Deposit Guarantee Fund or resolution fund contributions on the back of that. Thank you. I'll leave this one to Leo, but certainly, the growth in volumes, it's the main driver of the risk-weighted assets growth. Yes. Andrea, I think the issue is that on an average standpoint, you're not seeing a huge growth because, as we tried to explain before, most of the growth has taken place in the month of March. It has been back-loaded in the quarter. That's why we are kind of optimistic for the evolution of NII going forward, because these volumes will have to bring us interest in the coming quarters. At the end of the month, we have seen an increase in, obviously, RWAs, which were linked to this increase in the volumes. Okay. As per the deposit contribution for the Deposit Guarantee Fund and the IDE sig, I think the numbers should be pretty stable with regards to last year numbers. Around, I don't know, the Deposit Guarantee Fund will be, I don't know, around EUR 115 million-EUR 120 million, and the fund for Europe will be in the region of EUR 80 million-EUR 90 million. Yeah. Okay. Operator, next question, please. Next question comes from the line of Mario Ropero from Bestinver Securities. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. I wish you the best of luck to all you guys in the new stage. First question is, since you may need to get resources to fund future restructuring, one of the questions was, can you tell us how much unrealized gains you keep in the ALCO portfolio? What other levers you could use to fund restructuring? Another question on state guarantee loans, and apologies if you said that before, I missed this part. On the EUR 12.5 billion ICO loans, could you please tell us how much Stage 2 and Stage 3 loans you have there? Thank you. The resources to fund might have a number of origins for the future. To the specific question of how much upside we have in the ALCO book, I would say it is around EUR 1 billion, and I will leave more concretion for Leo to provide. Sure. On the ICO loans. We have very little in Stage 3, because, well, everything's performing yet. I would say around 2%, which compares. I saw this morning an article that came from Banco de España, which was sharing some data for the market. If I recall correctly, it was around 1% of Stage 3 loans booked in the ICO loans profile. While the Stage 2 is around 9%, if I recall correct, the data from Banco de España was around 8%. We seem to be more or less in the pack here. Okay. Can we move on to next question, please? It comes from the line of Carlos Peixoto from CaixaBank. Please go ahead. Hi. Morning. Thank you for taking my call. My questions. The first question would be on provisions. I was wondering if you could shed some light on your outlook for cost of risk for the year. Besides cost of risk, well, we have always these traditional provisions related with proposed assets, and NPA management costs. I was wondering whether the first Q figure for these two lines could be perceived as a reoccurring figure for coming quarters, particularly on the NPAs management costs. Secondly, on fees, if you could give us a bit of color on what you expect to see for the full year, that would be very helpful. Thank you. I'll leave the one on provisions to Leo. On fees, I think we are planning quite a bit of stability. We are reviewing, nevertheless, some elements of the structure of the fees in retail, but we don't foresee any major changes. In terms of provisions, I think, well, we guided at the end of last year for a cost of risk, which should be between 2019 and 2020. We are more or less there. The first quarter has been, well, slightly better than what we expected in terms of the evolution of asset quality. Far, so good, is what we can say. Of course, we need to wait and see what happens in second Q. As I said before, we have a big crunch of our moratoriums expiring this year, we and the rest of the sector. Things are looking good, but we need to see how this evolves in the coming quarters. Also, it's a little bit too soon, in my opinion, to change the guidance. Give us some time. I think the banks will need a little bit of time to see how these loans evolve from 2Q onwards, because it's close to 70%, 80% of the remainder, which is expiring this next quarter. So far, we've had good experience with what has expired. Well, we need to wait. I prefer to be a little bit more conservative here and see what we can see in the coming months. As per the provisions related to foreclose and NPA management, I would model them to be more or less stable throughout the year, if you wish. Okay. Thank you, Carlos. Operator, could we move to the next question, please? It comes from the line of Francisco Riquel. Please go ahead. Yes. Thank you. And, it's a pleasure having you on board here. It's reassuring to hear from you that you found no surprises in the balance sheet. I also appreciate the cleanup made by the end of last year. You have shown asset quality metrics, where you rank well in all the legacy NPLs and NPAs that you have in the balance sheet. I wonder if you can give us more color on the SME book. You have a large SME exposure, bigger than peers. The ICO loans there, for example, they are only maturing in three, four years from now. If you can share with us what you have already seen in that book and any feedback that you can give us there. Also a follow-up on this NPA management costs, which if I were to annualize, because you mentioned that it's recurrent, the management cost will be 20% of the net real estate assets, of the net book value, which looks too high for me. If you can please explain what's here. Thank you. Shall I go for the SME front, if you wish? Well, the truth is that, Paco, I've spent some time now looking at the books and basically comparing them with the market. As you all know, I have some previous experience in the market in Spain. I haven't seen something which is definitely different to others, to be completely honest with you. I was just trying to show factual data. I think we are in the pack. We are more or less where everybody is. Even if I go segment by segment, and I look at SME exposures, the breakdown of our book, it's relatively similar, even when I look at the different stages to our peers. We have a part of the book, which is in Stage 3, is probably even a little bit higher than our peers. Well, you can say that we are either more conservative or that we have a worse book. I don't know, because I don't know the books of my peers. We are more or less in line on that regard. When I look at the observed default rates of our books, and moreover, of our SMEs, they're not worse than the ones of our peers. They're actually even better. How is this going to evolve with these ICO loans going forward? Well, I think what is clear is that the measures that have been implemented, both moratorias and ICO, have been the right ones. I think that's the first thing to say. This certainly has given us the opportunity to manage this situation appropriately for the banks. I think the fact that these loans are maturing from 2023 onwards, it's pretty good because it's going to give a lot of time to these SMEs and corporates to basically recover from this, what we all hope it's going to be liquidity crisis. We are already seeing that the vaccines are coming. We're seeing that consumption is picking up in those countries where they are ahead in terms of the vaccination process. The economy is really picking up faster than what we all thought on those geographies. I would certainly expect that to happen here in continental Europe. If that is the fact, I think we will see that the evolution of those loans should be good. Again, as I said before, in the case of moratorias, it's too soon for me to give you. Unfortunately, I don't have a crystal ball, so I cannot give you the precise numbers of how this is going to evolve. So far, so good. I think the evolution is good. I think the macro is getting probably faster, better than what we thought. I mean, the micro within the macro. We are reasonably optimistic on that regard. Again, as I said, it's a little bit too soon to change guidelines or, unfortunately, to be able to give you any more color on that. I'm sorry, I don't remember the second question. Regarding the NPA costs evolution, future evolution. For the maintenance? Of managing NPA. What I said. I think this should be running down, obviously. It has been running down in the latest years, because the NPA pool has been coming down. We have our agreements with our servicers. As I said, I would tend to believe that the numbers that we showed in Q1 would be more or less stable throughout the year, and then perhaps going a little bit down in the coming years. This is a very stable or a reasonably stable number. Thank you, Paco. Let's move on to next question, please. Thank you. It comes from the line of Stefan Nedialkov from Citi. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi, guys. Good morning. Or, I guess good afternoon for you. It is Stefan from Citi. Just taking a step back, César has been at ING, obviously a much more of an asset light platform business in Spain, compared to a traditional bank. Leo was at Bankia, two very different business models. In the case of ING, obviously not many branches, et cetera. At Bankia, a lot of the capital generation was driven by delevering. Two very different approaches. How do you guys plan to turn the business around at Sabadell? There are many routes you can take. I know the Investor Day is on the 28th of May. Any big-picture comments, as to the overall approach you are going to take here? Related to that question, what would make M&A attractive to you at the group level? Not just Mexico or TSB, but just at the group level. How much time has to elapse at a minimum before you consider that M&A? If I may also loop back to what Leo said on risk management, that he went into the balance sheet and didn't see much difference versus peers. Leo, I believe you're right, if you look at the overall. However, when you split the book by corporate and retail, if I take CaixaBank as an example, Sabadell's LGD parameter for corporate is quite a bit higher versus CaixaBank. I don't know whether that's just the attitude towards risk management and risk underwriting in the previous X years before you came on board. How are you going to turn that around? How are you going to improve the risk management in terms of seniority of exposures, collateralization? How are you going to reprice that book to increase profitability? Sorry for the many questions and many sub-questions, but if you can just give us some color on the overall direction on the risk management and M&A, that'll be really useful. Thank you. Well, I think, Stefan, many of the questions that you have been raising, are intended to cover more on the Strategic Day than on the Q1. I think we will address a number of those on the 28th. On M&A guidance, I think the only thing that we are ready to share at this point in time is what we've expressed. That we believe on, and that's the mandate that we have from the bank, that we believe that our roadmap. Is as a standalone, that we believe that we have the sound starting point to do so, and that there are elements of improvement looking forward that, as I mentioned, we will cover in more detail. We've given some hints, that we will cover in more detail on the 28th. In terms of disposals, as I just mentioned, there's nothing at this point in time, neither on TSB nor Mexico, which are the largest ones. In terms of strategic alliances, we will continue exploring different fronts. On minor activities, always with much more of an industrial focus. Are there partners that can deploy, like in the renting business that we announced yesterday evening? Are there partners that can perform that industrial task with more scale, with more knowledge than we do ourselves? That's basically Leo, you maybe want to add something. Sure. Well, the first thing I'd like to add is that I really liked the comparison that you made at the beginning, Stefan, of the background of César and myself. That's one of the things I liked when César called me at the beginning of the year in order to join this project. I think we fit very well. I think César has a lot of knowledge of how to digitalize and how to run a bank with a lower amount of footprint. I bring some knowledge on the table of capital allocation, and efficiency on capital allocation, which is something that we've been very focused in Bankia. On top of that, getting into your question regarding the risk. Well, as I said, when I look at overall numbers, we are pretty similar to the market. I haven't specifically looked at a given target such as Caixa, as you were mentioning. We will address this with more detail at the strategic plan as César was explaining. The one thing that I think is very different or is different, at least to the average of our Spanish peers, it's our potential in terms of revenues. This bank earned a pre-provision profit of EUR 1.85 billion last year. When you look at metrics of NII, of fees, even of gross margin over total assets, probably this bank is number one or in some things number two in Spain. In other words, we have much more power in order to take care of a potentially higher cost of risk, which would be, in any case, derived from the fact that we have higher margins in the upper part of the P&L. When I compare, for example, with my past experience, I was just telling César when we were coming down, I am very excited about the path and the speed at which the income in this franchise can grow compared to experiences that I had with a very mortgage book weighted, which is much more difficult to evolve because it takes a long time. Thank you, Stefan. Operator, can we move on to next question, please? Next question comes from the line of Carlos Cobo from Societe Generale. Please go ahead. Hi. Good morning. Thank you very much for the presentation. Of course, congratulations and best of luck with the new roles. I'm going to follow up on some of the discussion before, trying to get a little bit more color from you. Two, three questions from me quickly. If I'm doing the numbers right, it has some estimates there, you have something like 4% of the total loans, is it still on moratoria as of December, or is your share of the unsecured share of ICO loans? Against that, the bank has provided very little provision or cost of risk as a buffer. Obviously I know the rationale why asset quality is going to be stronger this year, but could you give us a little bit of color on what is the expected default ratio that you are embedding in your guidance in the retail moratoria and the ICO loans so we can cross-check that? Because right now, if you keep 90% of your payment holiday loans after forming the models, the provisioning models can give you the cost of risk you want obviously, because it's not factoring in the potential NPA formation. Could you please elaborate a little bit on that? I think where it is lost there, and that's why the market is not pricing in the cost of risk that we're seeing across the sector. That would be super helpful. Then on TSB, it's another quick follow-up. In my opinion, the divestment in TSB was instrumental for the turnaround of Sabadell, refocusing on Spain, unlocking some capital potentially, depending on the price, to finance more restructuring. I understand the prospects for the U.K. banking sector are improving. That should improve price and valuation, but maybe Sabadell could get a better trade if they redeploy that capital or refocus on Spain. I don't really understand very well why you decide to postpone it. Is it because you didn't have acceptable bids? Could you touch on that if it's possible? Lastly, a very quick one on capital. What's your strategy on capital? Do you think there's a discussion in the bank that Sabadell could need a slightly higher capital ratio to reassure investors on the market on a higher valuation, carrying a higher capital ratio north of 12% to reassure on the exposure to SMEs, and the asset quality concern that could be waiting on the stock? Thank you, and sorry for the long questions. Yeah, if I may, I will take the TSB one and leave the other two for Leo. Of course, you always take the easy ones. Of course. Get used to it, Leo. Yeah, I know. On the TSB one, we see a potential of improvement in the franchise, and that is strong. Therefore it's of course a judgment call, but our judgment call is that this is the right decision, and that's why we, together with the board, have taken a clear view that in the near term, we are not going to start any process around the TSB. I hope that the results will show that we made the right decision. With that, I pass the easy ones to Leo. Okay, getting into the easy ones, especially one about the potential cost of risk, Carlos, I'm afraid I'm going to disappoint on the answer. I think it's too soon to try to give more guidance to the market. I think this bank tried to explain a little bit more in detail how we thought our customer's risk was going to perform last year. We showed our strategic models, they're very complicated as all models, they're based on a number of assumptions. I think it's very difficult to agree on a certain view there. In my opinion, I'm sorry, because I know the answer is going to disappoint you, I think we need to wait a little bit. We need to wait to see how this Q2 evolves. I think this is going to give us a good measurement of how asset quality is going to perform in the coming quarters, just one quarter away. I know we've all, banks and investors, been waiting for this for a year, and the banks have always said the same, no? Okay. Far, so good. Things are much better. I remember when I was rebudgeting last year in May, the assumptions that we were considering are nowhere where we are today, and I'm talking about my previous role, but it doesn't matter. You can go across any given bank. Things are evolving much better than what we thought, but let's wait. Just one quarter away. Let's wait a little bit and see how things come in the coming quarters. Let's wait until delivery. I want to deliver. I want to see what we can deliver. In terms of capital, I think we are comfortable with this 12%, and moreover, with the buffer, with the MDA buffer, which is what I really look at. We have an MDA buffer, which is very close to 370, which is very much in line with our peers, or even above some of our peers, which probably have exposures, well, to other markets. Which can be seen as good or bad, depending on the risk approach that you take to those exposures. In general terms, I believe, with the 360, 370, 350 management buffer, we are comfortable on running this bank. With the level of NPAs that we have and the kind of revenue that we can make and that I tried to point out before. Thank you, Carlos. Operator, next question, please. Next question comes from the line of Ignacio Cerezo from UBS. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thank you for the presentation, and welcome you both. I had a couple of questions, actually, on the U.K. We've seen two quarters already running where the loan yield seems to be ticking down from high levels. I want to understand how much of that is related to the mix, unsecured, kind of undergrowing mortgages or how much of that might be related to the pricing of conditions of the mortgage book in the U.K. The second one is on the swap you have in the country. If you can give us the size, the contribution, how would you expect that to contribute in coming quarters? Thank you. I'm sorry, Nacio. Can you restate again your question? I didn't fully understand the one of the volumes of the U.K. Yeah. The loan yield in the U.K. seems to have come down a little bit in the last couple of quarters. I would like to understand how much of that is related to mix changes, mortgages growing faster than the unsecured, or how much of that is related to the pricing conditions in the U.K. becoming a little bit more competitive. The second one would be on the structural hedge, the swap you have in the U.K., to protect the insensitive deposits, if you can give us the size of the swap, the contribution to the NII, and how would you expect that to evolve in coming quarters. Yeah. Thank you. Now it's much more clear. I think the mix of mortgages versus other riskier type of assets is one of the things that makes the yield go down, not too significantly. It's not too high, but it's basically that this very high growth of mortgages compared to a much more stable or even declining in some areas of other products. The mix is what carries the most of the weight. Of course, the markets are competitive. It's markets that are growing very healthily, and there's a lot of fight for the market share. The price of the mortgages has not been severely impacted. It's more the mix. Yeah, well, the second question is again, a little bit similar. We have been seeing a little bit of an impact on this hedge, and we may be seeing a little bit going forward, but in any case, the customer spread has remained pretty stable, QO Q, around 2.5%. While we are reducing the yields, we are trying to reduce also the cost of funds. Hopefully going forward it should improve. Thank you, Nacio. Operator, can we move on to next question, please? Next question comes from the line of Sofie Peterzens from JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Yeah. Hi, here is Sofie from JP Morgan. Thanks a lot for taking my questions. My first question would be to both the CEO and CFO. You mentioned that you went through the loan book, and you haven't found any negative surprises there, which is very encouraging. When you have gone through the bank, are there any other kind of surprises, either positive or negative, that you have found within Banco de Sabadell? If you could just share your thoughts here. My second question would be around the ICO loans. The government is basically saying that around EUR 3 billion of the ICO loans could be restructured. Is this going to have any impact on Banco de Sabadell? If so, what would the time frame be of a potential impact? Thank you. I'm very sorry. I look around and the faces, is that because of the voice sound, we were not able to clearly understand the question. I'm sorry to ask you. Oh, sorry. Sorry. No, I think I got it. César, please, Sofie, if I haven't got it, you remind me, okay? I think the first one is whether regarding the fact that we have gone through the books and we haven't found any negative surprises. As I said before, we were trying to be factual. I've tried to explain you what we have seen. The conclusion is that we haven't seen anything different from what other Spanish peers have. In my opinion, but of course, I'm biased here, I'm part of a bank, our asset quality is similar to our peers. No, we haven't found anything differently. There's no idiosyncratic issues at Sabadell, in my personal view. Yeah. The other element or maybe of less interest, in this type of setting, but it's also very important. Can you hear me? Yeah. Okay. Sorry for that. The other elements, I understand that are less relevant in this type of setting, I can assure you that for management, they are absolutely crucial. Which is to see the vibrancy, the enthusiasm, the caliber of the solutions, et cetera. In that sense, we found an organization that has, and I mentioned it at the beginning or at the opening, the eagerness to perform. That is unquantifiable, but let me tell you that it makes a tremendous difference in the ability to shape the future of the bank. We found flexibility, we found commitment, we found caliber in the people. We found that the SME franchise has elements that are clearly distinguishable from other competitors. The talks with clients are really, and they're very difficult to translate into numbers, but they really make a difference in the perception that we think this bank has. That's why, a clear element is that, when the transaction didn't go through, it's surprising to see the support from clients that didn't want to see Sabadell disappear as a competitor because the long-lasting relationships, on average, more than 11 years, the close relationship of our relationship managers. It's not a surprise. It's a very positive surprise, I would say. Thank you, Sofie. We just have time for one additional question. Operator, please. Yeah. Last question comes from the line of Fernando Gil from Barclays. Please go ahead. Hi. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Welcome everybody to the new roles. Wishing you all the luck. Two quick questions from my side. First one is there a time limitation where you can do additional cost restructuring in Spain and in the U.K.? This is one. Do the agreements signed with unions have a time frame where you cannot do additional cost restructuring? This is one. The second one is, if you can drive us through the P&L financials of the deal announced yesterday with ALD, sorry. How much NII impact will we see from 2022 going forward? Thank you very much. There is no limitation from a regulatory or from agreements with trade unions on further decisions of further restructuring. On the ALD, the net income in last year, in 2020, was around EUR 7 million. It's not going to be significant, going forward, any change. The rationale of the transaction has not been for the 10 basis points that we are going to get from the combination of the reduction of 320 billion in risk-weighted assets together with the value that brings also a surplus. We've not done it for these 10 basis points. The rationale has been really to have a better partner, to be able to offer better solution to our customers, and certainly to move out of our book assets that are less in line with the type of assets that we want to hold at the bank. Okay. Thank you, César and Leo. That concludes our Q&A session today. As always, the Investor Relations team is at your disposal and will be happy to take any further questions you may have. Thank you everyone for participating and for joining us today. Have a great day. Thank you. Thank you all.