Good morning, and welcome to Citycon's Q1 result webcast. My name is Valtteri Piri, and I'm working as legal and investor relation manager here in Citycon. Today with me, we have our CEO, Henrica Ginström, and CFO, Sakari Järvelä. They will now present the key highlights from the first quarter, and after that, we open the line for the questions. Henrica, please go ahead. Thank you, Valtteri. Good morning, and welcome also on my behalf to this Q1 results webcast. I want to start by presenting the new senior management team in Citycon. I'm both excited and grateful for the opportunity to serve as the CEO of Citycon. During my 13 years in the company, I've had the privilege to be part of Citycon's journey to become the leading owner and developer of urban hubs in the Nordics and Baltics. Together with me, developing Citycon for the future, I have a strong and experienced team. Sakari started as the CFO in February, and Helena and Jussi started in their respective roles in April, all internal recruitments. This is a group with varied backgrounds in the areas of financing, retail operations, and investments, and I believe this is exactly the qualities we need in the company. As the new CEO, I want to start by highlighting that we continue to stay committed to our long-stated necessity-based strategy, where we focus on high-quality assets in strong, growing urban markets in the major Nordic cities. Our centers are connected to public transportation, and we focus on necessity-based retail and essential services. With this, we address the everyday needs of our communities. This type of retail promotes the daily traffic to our properties, and it creates stability throughout the cycles. During the last 5 years, Citycon has actively been evolving the tenant mix, where we have been increasing the share of groceries, municipal tenants, and other day-to-day services, and I believe we are at the forefront of this development, de-risking our business. Today, 45% of Citycon's tenants are necessity-based, and importantly, the public tenants present more than 7% of our GRI. In this chart, it's good to note that the groceries and service tenants pay higher rent on average than the fashion tenants, and also they have longer maturities, and the investment needs are usually significantly smaller over time as we compare to the faster-changing fashion concepts. Then to the Q1 performance. Operational performance in January to March 2024 was strong, with like-for-like net rental income increasing by 6.5%, supported by rent indexations and also strong performance in our core assets. Like-for-like tenant sales increased 3%, as the sales development continued strong, especially in our main tenant categories. We saw a decline only in the fashion and home and sporting goods segments, but groceries, our main segment, grew by 5%. Footfall was flat over last year, but that was partially also impacted by the timing of Easter. Fair values were stable in all countries, but we did note a gain on the consolidation of the Kista acquisition of EUR 46 million. Average rents increased 4.1%, and we have been able to push through full indexations also this year, and on top of that, also, we have had a small positive leasing spread. It's good to note that the occupancy cost ratio remains at a low level, and that demonstrates the healthiness of our assets, tenants, but also the increasing tenant sales. Occupancy decreased slightly from year-end due to normal seasonal variation, as the beginning of the year is usually slower. More importantly, when you compare to last year, occupancy increased, and we are expecting also occupancy to move up during the year. To the balance sheet side, a key focus area for us. I would like to highlight Citycon's commitment to the investment-grade credit rating. We demonstrated this commitment during this quarter, when we executed the EUR 48 million share issuance. This action was necessary to address the elevated LTV and secure our credit rating. Also, we had to act very quickly, and we decided that a directed share issue was the best option for the company and for all shareholders. Following that, we did a very successful EUR 300 million green bond issuance, and at the same time, we tendered back EUR 200 million of the bonds maturing in 2024. This was another very important transaction, where we addressed our main near-term debt maturities. More recently, after the quarter end, we have extended our debt maturities further to reduce the refinancing risk, and Sakari will comment on this in more detail shortly. In connection with the financial statements 2023, we outlined the targets regarding asset disposals and cost savings measures, with the main goal of strengthening our balance sheet and cash flows. We announced yesterday in the financial statements the divestment of Kongsenteret in Norway, very close to book value. The book value was approximately EUR 30 million. This shows that the transaction market is picking up and that the sellers' and buyers' prices are coming closer. We are committed to our announced divestment target, and following the recent divestment, the remaining target for this year is approximately EUR 350 million. We have several active, ongoing discussions in excess of this amount, and we are working with the prospective buyers. Erik and his team are fully dedicated to the process, and we are confident that some of these negotiations will lead into the signed deals, and we will keep you informed. During the beginning of the year, we have executed several cost savings measures. Through organizational changes and consolidation of group functions to our Iso Omena head office, we have been able to reduce our head count cost substantially. Earlier this week, we also announced outsourcing of certain financial functions to create flexibility and efficiencies. We are committed to delivering on our overhead run rate target of less than 10% of NRI by the end of this year, and this corresponds to a run rate G&A of approximately EUR 8 million-EUR 10 million less than in 2023. These changes resulted in some reorganization and one-time costs, as you could note in our Q1 admin costs. ESG is a key cornerstone in how we are operating our business, and Citycon was recognized as European Climate Leader again for the fourth consecutive year. I think this reflects our commitment and is a testament to the efforts of our whole team. We are also a Nordic leader with sustainable financing. We have over EUR 1 billion green issuances, and all our recent bonds and loans have been in green format or sustainability-linked. Our work at Lippulaiva is a great example of how sustainability can be integrated into our operations, demonstrating how environmental responsibility is an integral part of our business strategy. With that, I will now turn over to Sakari to review the financial performance. Thank you, Henrica, and welcome also on my behalf. Financially, we can report another solid quarter, with net rental income growing 6.7%, or 8.2% in constant currencies. It should be noted, though, that as we consolidated Kista Galleria at the end of February, the first quarter includes one month of income from Kista. This added approximately EUR 1 million to the NRI that was not there in the previous year. This impact, among others, is adjusted for in the like-for-like NRI, which grew by 6.5%. As already noted by Henrica, this is a year of restructuring for Citycon, which means we will be incurring one-time restructuring costs throughout the year, mainly during the first half. We already booked a total of EUR 4.3 million of restructuring and other one-time costs in the first quarter, negatively impacting our direct operating profit and EPRA earnings, which declined 1.1% compared to last year. To present a better view of the underlying earnings performance, we have, for this year, changed the calculation method for adjusted EPRA earnings, which is now reported excluding the one-time costs. Importantly, we have not restated the historical adjusted EPRA earnings numbers accordingly, so it is not directly comparable to last year's level, and hence, the reported 27.4% growth rate in Q1 does not reflect a like-for-like comparison. Just as a rough guidance, if we had restated 2023, the growth rate in adjusted EPRA earnings would have been around 10%, or around 5% per share. On this slide, we show a more detailed breakdown of changes in net rental income from last year to this year. As you can see, our like-for-like properties and redevelopment project added a total of EUR 3.6 million compared to Q1 last year. As mentioned on previous slide, the one month of Kista added another EUR 1 million. This positive EUR 4.6 million growth was partly offset by some negative items, mainly still coming from the closed Torp Østcenter in Norway. Also, the Swedish and Norwegian kronas again weakened in the first quarter, which continued to impact our NRI negatively. Similarly, on this slide, we show the development of EPRA earnings. Apart from the EUR 3.9 million positive NRI change shown in the previous slide, there are two notable items affecting earnings. First, the G&A costs were EUR 1.7 million higher compared to last year, driven by the reorganization costs and other one-time items. Also, the net financial expense was EUR 2.8 million higher compared to last year. This, in turn, follows partly from the increased interest rates on the debt we have refinanced during the last 12 months, and also partly from the consolidation of Kista Galleria, which added more debt into our balance sheet. The valuations were relatively uneventful in this first quarter, as the total value of our asset portfolio remained largely stable. The positive EUR 46.2 million increase in our total asset values resulted fully from the acquisition of 50% of Kista Galleria at a large discount to book value. The rest of the portfolio recorded flat fair values. We reported an EPRA NRV of 8.96 per share, down from 10.78 last year. EUR 0.20 of this change was due to weaker currencies, and all per share items were negatively affected by the increased share count by approximately 12 million shares during the first quarter. On the funding side, though, the first quarter was, in turn, very eventful. First, we completed a directed share issue of approximately EUR 48 million, or 11.9 million shares, to institutional investors. We have commented on this transaction extensively over the last months, but I would still like to emphasize, as Henrica did before, that the driver for the issue was concern expressed about our reported credit metrics after our Q4 report. We remain fully committed to our investment-grade rating, and hence, we wanted to act swiftly and decisively to protect our rating. The issue in itself was very successfully executed, and we received wide support from existing and new shareholders, which we were extremely pleased about. In March, following the equity issue, we issued a new EUR 300 million, five-year green euro bond with a simultaneous tender offer for the October 2024 euro bond maturity. This was another very important and very successful transaction, taking out the near-term refinancing risk and extending our average debt maturities. The weighted average maturity is another very important credit metric for us right now, and we have been putting an increased focus on improving it. Last night and this morning, we announced several important actions to this end. First, we have recently completed extensions of over EUR 850 million of loans. We exercised the one-year extension option in our EUR 650 million euro credit facility, pushing the tenor back to 3 years. Also, we completed a full renegotiation and extension of the approximately EUR 206 million euro term loan, which we consolidated with Kista Galleria. This loan was due to mature next year, but has now been extended to 5 years. Finally, we are today launching a make whole process to repay the remaining outstanding amount of the October 2024 bond maturity, which now completes the refinancing of the originally EUR 550 million euro bond in October, which is a real milestone for us. On slide 17, you can see the impact of the loan extensions, where the bulk of the maturities has now been pushed to year 2027 and beyond. Also, as we clear the remaining part of the 2024 October bond, we will not have any debt maturities before the end of 2025. Following these extensions, we increase our weighted average maturity to 3.4 years, above the 3-year trigger that S&P is monitoring. Our total available liquidity is strong, at EUR 535 million, and share of secured loans from our total debt remains relatively low at 26%, with some further remaining capacity to access secured loan market, if needed. Our core credit metrics weakened somewhat this quarter, mainly due to the consolidation of Kista and weaker currencies, which offset the positive effect coming from the equity issue. There is also a slight seasonal effect in cash flows, which typically make Q1 ratios slightly weaker. We are, of course, working actively to turn this trend and expect all the core ratios to improve by year-end, mainly driven by the divestments. As discussed before, the average interest rate is also increasing, mainly due to the refinancings we have undertaken over the last 12 months, and the Kista loan added to our balance sheet. We are reaffirming the financial guidance for the full year 2024, which we gave in February, given the keeping the ranges unchanged. I would note at this point, that the guidance is based on year-end 2023 exchange rates. But at this early point in the year, we are not yet giving any indications on what the expected FX impact would be for the full year. Also, I can confirm that the guidance for adjusted EPRA earnings is set based on the new calculation method, which excludes reorganization costs and other one-time items. With that, I can complete our presentation and open up for questions. Operator, please go ahead. If you wish to ask a question, please dial pound key five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial pound key six on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Simen Mortensen, from DNB Markets. Please go ahead. Hi, guys. Thank you for a good presentation. I just have a few questions. In terms of the communication on average interest rate, which you now say 3.18, does that include the recent loans refinanced, announced post the quarter, or is it excluding those? It's including... It's excluding those, given that it is an end of the quarter, so refinancings were post-quarter end. Can you give any flavoring on the terms of the new loans you have received after the end of the quarter, please? We're not disclosing the interest rate, you know, in a lot of detail. But what I can say is that, of course, especially the Kista renegotiated loan will carry a higher base rate, given that we had a relatively low interest rate cap on majority of that amount. But now we are still putting in place a cap, which lowers the interest rate or the STIBOR base rate, but the interest rate will be above the average, but lower than what the recent bond issues have shown. And secondly, on hedging, will this be a floating mortgage, floating loan, or a fixed loan long term? And your recent refinancing also, I can't see anything on your hedging ratio in the report, and if you can communicate a bit on that, on interest rate expect, It will be the loan is based on a floating interest rate, so STIBOR three months. But as said, we're putting a cap on the full amount of the loan. So it will be, at the current point, fixed. But if interest rate or the base rates decline, then there will be, hopefully, a low interest rate in the future. ... Okay, my second question goes on the sale of Konsentrat. If you can communicate anything on the value of that transaction? And secondly, you communicated at the Q4 results that you had two transactions pending in Norway. Is this one of them? And secondly, what about number two? Yes. So first, to answer the first question, we sold very close to book value, and as I mentioned, the book value is around EUR 30 million. Yes, this was one of the transactions in the Norwegian market. Then we have also a smaller transaction there, which we have also in the held for sale. But then in addition, as I said, we have many different active dialogues at the moment also beyond those two. Thank you. You also said on the reorganization that, you had, will book, if I understood correctly, throughout the year, there will come more reorganization charges. Are we to understand that this is something that will occur also in Q2 and perhaps in Q3? I think I would say that the bulk of the actions have been completed. There are some restructuring costs that still will go into Q2, and potentially even to Q3, but I would say that after the first half, we are basically completed in terms of or recorded all of the costs. It's just that the timing effect in booking the costs, and some of the restructuring costs take a little bit of time to realize, mainly in the severance payments. But the actions to get the FTEs closer to the run rate where we want it to be have almost 100% been already executed. Can you give a numerical guidance on kind of what, what you're talking about in terms of, charges for the reorganization in Q2 and Q3? If we added EUR 4.3 million in the first quarter, we probably expect you can expect another maybe 2 million for the rest of the year to come after Q1. But that's not an accurate number, so it's an estimate. Okay. Yeah, but, but it's an estimate. Thank you. Secondly, and my last question, it comes to the announcement of your outsourcing, accounting, and financing. Can you just give us a bit of coloring on the rationale behind that and how we're to think about that externally? Sure. So the driver has been that we operate in several countries. We have, of course, properties and the related property accounting in several countries, and once we are in the divestment mode, we will be reducing our operations in some countries and our operations as a whole. So we feel that at this point in time, this outsourcing provides us a greater flexibility to adjust the size of our operations and, you know, as we divest the assets. Because the outsourcing will be much more flexible, and the costs will react much quicker than if we would be adjusting, in a way, the FD run rate ourselves. Thank you. Those are all my questions, and I will give the line to the next guy. Thank you. The next question comes from Neeraj Kumar from Barclays. Please go ahead. Morning, everyone. So I have two questions, and the first one is in regards to your commitment to the IG rating. I mean, I, I really appreciate all the actions you have taken so far with regards to it. However, if I may ask, why is IG rating important for you? I mean, given the... your disposal target of EUR 950 million in next one and a half year or so, looks like the size of the company is going to shrink a lot, and you'll have a lot of disposal proceeds to deleverage. Isn't it easy to just rely on the bank market for your financing needs and not take actions which may be, like, sort of not accretive from an equity point of view? Mm. Well, I can, I can take that question. Mm. Thanks. Thank you, Neeraj, for the question. I mean, I mean, the IG rating remains critically important for us, the way we see it. We will be issuing the bond markets, and we have a large outstanding bond portfolio. The divestments will realize, and that will provide funding and to repay debt. But in this process, we also operate under the covenants of the current bonds, which include secured solvency. So in terms of funding our business going forward, we feel that the bank market is very important, but there will always be a balance between banks and bonds. And at this point, we want to underline that we will stay investment grade, and that will continue to support our pricing in the bond market. Got it. And second question is just linked to this: so how should I be thinking about your hybrid? Well, the hybrid, as we have said before, the first hybrid comes to call, end of this year. We've been reviewing our options. We're reviewing transactions that others, hybrid holders, have been doing in the market. There seems to be quite a lot of activity and sort of a certain structure unfolding that probably is also available for us. We have not taken any decisions on that. We will do that later in the year. But what we can say, as we've said all along, we're committed to IG, and hence, we commit to retaining that equity credit. And we will be choosing a structure that retains that in dealing with the hybrid. ... Got it. Just like a linked question on that, so given your disposal target of EUR 950 million, the asset base is going to reduce over a period of time, so aren't your hybrid exposure going to go beyond 15% limit from S&P, and you sort of risk losing the equity treatment on that incremental portion? How... Do you have any thoughts to share on that? I think, I think after the consolidation of Kista, our asset base actually increased. So currently, we don't have any overhang above that 15%, so, so, all of our hybrid bonds carry the equity credit. There's still some room to reduce the hybrid stack according to S&P's methodology as we interpret it. You know, if the, if the size of the hybrid stack becomes inefficient, we can always consider that. But at the end of the day, we want to underline that we're committed to keeping those, you know, hybrid bonds on the balance sheet. They're permanent, and, and they're important for the investment grade rating. So any changes will be reviewed in future stage, in the light of or through the lens of retaining the IG. Got it. Thank you very much, Kari. That's all for me. The next question comes from Michael Chara from BNP Paribas. Please go ahead. Hi, thank you for the call. I just want to make sure I've get a few things straight. So on Kista Galleria, you bought this acquisition for EUR 110 million from your JV partner. You had it on your book at EUR 173 million. I believe your JV was kind of a force, you know, very strongly looking to sell. So the first one would be: What gives you the confidence to rightsize this asset up? And what gives you the confidence that, when you do your appraisals externally, that they wouldn't write it down probably closer to the acquisition, to the transaction level with, of this acquisition? The next question is on Kista Galleria. I see the principal amount of the bond of the loan has dropped. Can you tell me, you know, why that is the case? Then the next one is, so your debt to that, plus equity is probably, from an S&P basis, is probably 58%, so above the 55% threshold. Would it not be prudent to cut the dividend? And then the other thing, too, is, can you tell me anything about the NDAs, which you had in November from your predecessors? We're talking about I think you said it was EUR 350 million. What happened to that interest? Was it, was it price-based? That's, you know, I do notice your cap rates are basically flat while the market has gone up. And then lastly, you've got the, the bridge... You got the pressure, the dividend, and actually finding a solution for the hybrids all in one. I guess you have three different stakeholders. So what comes up top? Does the dividend get cut first, or which is the one which you say sacrosanct? Thanks. Starting with Kista. Mm-hmm. I'm not sure I got the first question, the first part of Kista. Was it like the growth of Kista? What was... Could you still specify first? Sure. In your annual report, you said you bought the 50% of the JV for EUR 110 million, and you had it valued at EUR 173 million. So that's a very big disconnect. So you bought it at a 36% discount to where you have it at your, on your books, and you've now just revalued that asset up quite substantially. So that's essentially the bulk of the question. Is that even prudent to be doing that? Yeah, I... We didn't, of course, we didn't revalue the asset up. But of course, compared to the purchase price, there is a, as you say, there is a difference. But I would say this was a seller who wanted to exit the market. So we have had discussions with the valuator and don't see it as the market indication. So, we had a dialogue and the yield of Kista remains flat, compared to the end of the year. So I think that is... And then you had a second, did you have a second question on Kista still there? Something on the principal of the loan. Yes, about the loan. I saw that it dropped in size. It was, like, EUR 206 million, and the new one is probably equivalent to around EUR 177 million. You know, you know, how come? So, the Kista loan originally was around SEK 2 billion, and now we, in the process of renegotiation or as we renegotiated the loan, we repaid the principal by SEK 300 million, so around EUR 330 million, say. Okay. Was that mandated from the banks because the LTV had come down? What was the... You know, sorry, it had gone up. What was the reason there? There were other structural things around that loan, so we also added collateral, so. Oh, you added extra collateral to, with the EUR 30 million coming down? Yes, that's correct. How much extra collateral? We're not specifically disclosing that, but the LTV is somewhere maybe around 40%-45%. Okay. And then the next ones was on the debt-to-equity at 50, S&P equivalent of approximately 58%. The threshold is 55. Would it not be prudent to cut the dividend, given that you are basically, you know, on notice to be downgraded to high yield? That is, of course, always a balancing act. But, as we stated also, already in last quarter, we cut the dividend quite substantially, and, actually this year we have made several measures. We have cut CapEx to the minimum. We have done, as you can see here in the presentation, a lot of savings on both the admin side and on the OpEx side, creating more room for the dividend on that side. The AGM has decided on the full year mandate, and now the board makes the decision basically quarterly. But at this point, there was a decision made to be paid a dividend for this quarter. ... Then, the next question was on the—so in November, your predecessor talked about you had, there was EUR 350 million of transactions with under NDAs. I mean, substantial amount of time has passed. What happened to those? I do notice your net initial yields have stayed flat at around 5.3%-5.4% over 5 years, and most of the market has actually risen substantially. Has that been, like, a blockage for why that we haven't heard progress from that? If you could care to comment. Yes, there was one larger deal there in that one, and there was just we didn't feel that was the right pricing for that specific asset. And now we have dialogues where we feel we are closer to our book values and feel that those are better deals for us. That's the main reason. How much was the gap? Was it 20%, 10%? We don't want to comment, but in general, we are looking for. We think we can divest this, that at not very big discounts to our book values, so but, not want to comment more on that. But I think we can. I think the deals we are discussing at this point are not very, very big gaps to our book values. Okay. And then lastly, on the ICR, I mean, you've got the bridge, you've got your Kista Galleria loan, you've got this, that the hybrid bonds coming due in September. Your ICR is gonna probably face quite a bit of pressure, assuming you're looking at the bond market to finance that. How are you going to address those hybrids? Would you cut the dividend or suspend the dividend to give you that extra capital? Because those hybrids go to around 7—reset to around the 7 handle yield. You're probably looking at 6, the senior, at the senior market right now, which isn't that, you know, which is pretty similar level. You know, how do you, you know, what... You know, who comes out on top? Mm. I think I'm not sure who comes out on top, but I think, I think what I can say is that, if you, if you read the S&P report that they published, earlier this year after our capital markets transactions, it gives a relatively clear runway when it comes to the rating. And, and the ICR trigger was actually reduced or reintroduced at 1.8, which is a lower level than before. So currently, we actually have a relatively decent headroom when it comes to the ICR. Of course, the, the hybrid bonds, w- you know, if they, whether they reset or, or get exchanged or refinanced, the coupon will increase, and that will affect the ICR going forward. But at this point, I mean, once we execute our divestments, we repay some near-term loans, and I would like to just denote that we've cleared now all of the near-term maturities, so the next one is in 2025. So we see the path for the ICR that stays within the metrics as we reduce also the LTV. When it comes to the Kista loan, I would just reiterate what I answered previously, that of course the interest rate will be higher than you know that it was before or what the average or what our average interest rate has been, but it's not punitively so, given that we have capped 100% of that nominal to a lower level where the LIBOR is. Should we be thinking 5% for modeling purposes? That’s not too far off, so I think that’s a fair, fair assumption. Okay, thank you. Thanks for the questions. The next question comes from Ventsi Vasilev from Kempen. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Thank you for the presentation and taking my questions. Two questions. First one, a bit on the operational side. Usually, you publish re-leasing spreads, but this time I didn't, I failed to find this in the report. Is there anything you can comment? And also, what the outlook is in general? Yeah. I think leasing spread is a pretty difficult metrics because everybody is calculating it in their own way, so we mainly use it actually as an internal metric. We are actually pretty pleased to see that we can on top of the indexation get a positive leasing spread, a slight positive leasing spread, given we have had now a few years of very high indexations, which we have gotten through. I would say we don't see anything. We see the leasing market pretty normal. It is a little bit weaker in Sweden compared to the other markets, maybe a little bit stronger in Norway compared to the average. But we see the market being pretty good and stable at the moment. That is what we see at the moment. Yes. And then second question, also a bit more operational. So, if I look at the like-for-like NRI growth, it's also partly driven by margin improvement. Is that correct to assume? And also, let's say, how are electricity costs feeding into that? Should we expect some worsening, or should we expect it to improve going forward? Yes. Yes, there is also a little bit of margin improvement. We have been working a lot on our recovery rates during the last years, and that is now starting to show also that we're able to recover a bigger proportion of the OpExes. And then on the electricity, we hedge it running for what, 12 months. How it moves, it will start now. We did hedging for this year from last year. Now we saw a pretty big increase in electricity costs for this year, but, now we will see it go down also, I think going forward a little bit, depending on how the market is moving. ... Okay, thank you. And then last one, just to- Just to add on electricity, as you know, we operate triple net, so typically we recover the electricity costs from the tenant. Okay, thanks. And then just a follow-up question on the discussions you have, because you also remain committed to disposing EUR 380 million by the end of the year. Could you please quantify whether you're in discussions that exceed this amount, or what gives you confidence that you will reach it? Yeah. We are in discussions for in excess of this amount, but we don't want to be too specific. And we rather would like to inform you whenever we have completed a deal, but we are very committed now to these divestments, and we are in active dialogue, and we have good ongoing discussions, and on the table. Okay, thank you. That's it from my side. The next question comes from Svante Krokfors from Nordea. Please go ahead. Good morning. Thank you, Henrica and Sakari, for the good presentation. A couple of questions left from my side. First, regarding the divestments, I mean, your announced divestments have been quite heavily tilted towards Norway. Could you elaborate a bit on what makes divesting in Norway easier than in other countries? And could we expect, or do you have ongoing discussions in other countries also? I think Norway has now been the most active transaction market. I think there has been a lot of a lot of local money and funds there that have been looking for objects. So I think, as you state, Norway is probably the most active market, but also in some other markets we have active dialogues. So it's not only in Norway, but that is a very good market at the moment. Have you seen any change in the market activity in Finland and Sweden? Are the- Mm ... bid-ask spreads, narrowing? Yeah, we see absolutely the dialogues, you know, becoming more, and there starts to be more appetite at the moment. So we see it, but I think we... Let's see how it evolves from now on. Now, of course, in Sweden with the interest rate cut, we expect that also to start showing slowly. Thank you, and the last question regarding your EPS earnings per share and adjusted EPS earnings per share guidance. Could you remind us about the assumptions regarding refinancing, both when it comes to hybrids and other financing? We have the guidance underlying in the guidance when it comes to interest expense and the hybrids is that we keep refinancing near-term maturities. Of course, we have now completed most of them. When it comes to hybrids, we assume, as we have stated, that the hybrids are permanent and that they're staying in place. So we are projecting a coupon according to that. Okay, thank you. That is all from me. Thanks, Svante. Thank you. The next question comes from Simen Mortensen from DNB Markets. Please go ahead. Thank you. A follow-up question from me. In terms of CapEx, you have driven this down quite significantly, if I understand correctly. But at the same time, the hybrids, you say, are gonna remain in place, the cash flow from operations, free cash flow for doing CapEx will be reduced. And I'm just curious, how have you seen your portfolio compare to the new energy building performance directive revisions, which will require refurbishment- Mm ... of assets for having them to be let out in, European markets? And, and if you can give any coloring on the status of your portfolio, and what kind of impact you can see from the energy performance of building directive revisions. Maybe to answer the first question, I mean, now we are talking about a pretty short period. We have been working on our assets actively for, you know, years and years. So, one year with a little bit less does not move the needle for a building. So I would say we are very well set up in our properties. We have we're working with energy efficiency projects for a long, long time, so we are actually we feel pretty confident that we will not be hitting any limits. But then, of course, we have very ambitious targets going forward, and see opportunities still on that side. And there's also different ways to finance and have third parties in the energy, on the energy side. Do you want to comment, Sakari, on the reporting side here? Yeah, I mean, we haven't really publicly commented on the regulation, as you mentioned. The only thing we can say is that, we've been, as Henrica said, investing our assets proactively over the years before, and we're confident that our assets will be in compliance at all times with all the regulations, including this one. I think I would just, you know, further comment on the CapEx that, of course, we've reduced the CapEx a lot also a little bit on the maintenance side. But the bulk of the reduction comes from development, which we have basically mostly put on hold, and also from tenant improvements, which we used to do quite a bit, actually, when we were actively managing tenant mix towards the more necessity-based and grocery-driven. But we're much, much further there, so this year we will be doing much less of that. So it's not so much that we are compromising on maintenance or energy. Okay, and to understand, also, all your properties are currently now above the energy performance certificate grades for the first few years in the Energy Building Performance Directive, if I understood correctly? Yes. Or is there any assets that... No, we are not aware- Okay ... of any assets which would not fill the requirements. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. There are no more questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers for any closing comments. Well, we would like to thank you for this call, and have a good day. Thank you. Thank you.