Good afternoon, welcome to F-Secure's Q2 2026 Result Webcast. I'm Tiia Tikkanen from F-Secure's Investor Relations, and I'm joined here by our CEO, Timo Laaksonen, and CFO, Robin Pulkkinen, who will give you a presentation on the key highlights and financial development over the past quarter. After their presentation, there's time for you to ask questions, you can already post them in the webcast tool. You live here in Helsinki, if you have question, just raise your hand and we'll bring you a microphone. With that, without further ado, Timo, the stage is yours. Thank you, Tiia. Welcome also on my behalf. Thanks for taking the time to join us on this beautiful Finnish summer's day, both here in the room as well as online, wherever you may be. Our header says the most important thing from our strategic point of view. We saw strong growth in the second quarter, thanks to our embedded business doing well. Let's get to the details. Our currency-neutral growth was roughly 10%, that was driven by the good development in the embedded security business, especially within the Tier 1 segment. I'll get to more details in a moment. Our reported revenue was EUR 39.8 million. Some headwinds there with U.S. dollar and especially Japanese yen, unfortunately. We saw a moderate decline in Security Suite, we are clearly seeing a possibility now to return to a more balanced resource allocation towards both embedded and Security Suite on commercial and product fronts than what we've had in the past couple of quarters. Our adjusted EBITA was slightly lower than last year because of planned investments that we made during the quarter. The result is precisely as we had planned. This is not a surprise to us. We are proceeding, as a matter of fact, up until the end of H1 precisely as planned, and as you know, our guidance is unchanged. With the Tier 1 expansion now well underway, we are focusing on driving our service adoption amongst all of our partners. Tier 1's major partners and commercial partners. We are naturally driving revenue towards better profitability. We don't see pressure anymore to increase our operating expenses, whereas our revenue is expected to continue growing at a good pace. In the quarter, we had a couple of bigger events that we've already announced to the public. We signed our deal with Verizon, which was a long time coming, in early April. On the very same day when we signed the deal, it already went live. That goes to show that we had been working on it in the background already for quite some time, since something like August, September last year. As we've indicated before, our minimum guaranteed revenue of that deal is $15 million, about EUR 13 million for each full year of service. Naturally, the growth beyond this guaranteed level will be driven by the service uptake, which is looking good. We are doing everything in our power to ensure that in the second half of the year, we could already see subscriber numbers and service take-up rates to exceed this minimum level. We enhanced our partnership with NTT DOCOMO in Japan. Two new Scam Protection related services. AI-powered scam detection, which is typically SMS, online shopping, and so forth, but also now Deepfake Protection. That Deepfake Protection and Detection service is now the first one we've launched anywhere in the world. That's a completely new capability we now have in our portfolio in Embedded Security. Very exciting to see in the upcoming quarters how the uptake of that service develops. That's something which is truly novel and market leading. We have been working with DOCOMO since 2023 when we acquired Lookout Life, and we now managed to deepen this relationship even further. That's always good news. We announced in December that we have signed up another significant Tier 1 communication service provider. Our expectation at that moment in time, based on the information we got from this partner, was that they would be aiming for a launch at the turn of quarter two and quarter three. We are seeing that launch being delayed due to their internal resource prioritizations and project prioritization by anything between one to two quarters. That's naturally something that we were looking forward to getting online around now. We continue working with the team. The project is ongoing, but there are certain resources on their side which have not yet been made available. The logos that you can see there around our dear Earth, that's the logos of the partners we're already serving in the Tier 1 sector. I find that impressive. We run a consumer security survey all across the world every year, and that's about 10,000 consumers in 10 countries. We came out with this report in May 2026, and a few very interesting data points, not only here but on the next slide. More than half of consumers that were interviewed here or surveyed here are encountering scam attempts every single month. Those attempts are mostly fake invoices, investment scams, payment scams. Those are also, in pretty much this order, the same ones that people fall for. There is one type of scam which is not as common, but people fall for it much more, and that's online shopping scams. If you look at the second number, 52% of victims lose money, more than double the 2025 rate. The number of scam attempts has not increased at all from 2025 to 2026. The percentage of people who fall for them and lose money has doubled. I'm drawing the conclusion here, pure speculation, that the scams are more devious and more cunning, and people fall more easily for them. I have to say that AI must have something to do with that. The final one on the slide on the right is that 51% of people are willing to pay for a dedicated Scam Protection service, which is slightly up. As you may remember, our Halo Project is precisely a dedicated Scam Protection application. That is a relevant number from our perspective. We've seen that Scam Protection has been a competitive differentiator, as the header says, for the digital service providers that we work with. They have clearly seen that there is demand for this service. Here is the number I was referring to as I was going through the previous slide. There is a clear trust inflection point in the market. Based on the same survey that I just referred to, 84% of people, pretty much five out of six, don't trust AI to tell what's real. Just to give an example, roughly, people write about one billion prompts to ChatGPT every single week. About 800 million on Gemini. People are using AI actively, but they don't trust the results, or they don't trust what they are seeing. There's a massive trust gap in there, and that is what we want to fill with providing services that allow people to, once again, be confident online. Two capabilities that we're developing right now, we call the initiative F-Secure Trust. TrustPath, which is securing entire digital lifestyle flows, such as shopping, which is the first case that we're working on. TrustGuard, which is a protection layer around ChatGPT or Gemini, which makes sure that you don't enter private information, for instance, your Social Security number, your bank account numbers, and so forth, into the prompts that you're writing. It secures that the results you're getting from these chatbots are reliable, and it is providing you the sources of data that the response that the AI assistant is giving to you, what those sources have been, so that you can be more confident about working with AI assistants. Those are the two things we're working on. We're expecting to be in beta phase in quarter four and production phase in quarter one. These are maybe, if not the fastest, some of the very fastest initiatives F-Secure has ever worked on. The market moves at breakneck speed, so do we. This development is supported by another partnership that we launched in May with Qutwo, which is a leading European AI lab. They are speeding up our own activities, especially in on-device AI and federated learning, which is very crucial in the TrustPath case. Naturally, on-device AI is also one way to mitigate your risks of driving higher AI costs as you provide the services. Local AI is a way to protect privacy of users' data and secondly, mitigate cost risks. Halo is something we've talked about for the past year, roughly Mobile-first Scam Protection, consumer first experience. One small thing on this slide, which is different from before, is that we call it Project Halo. We like the name Halo a lot in the company. We've also seen that it is a good name in the market. However, now that we're getting closer to the launch of the service, we see that unfortunately it's not a defendable trademark and we are in the process of rebaptizing this product, and we'll most likely announce that name latest in September when we're going live with it. That's just the name of it. We have done clearly user-centric experience innovation. We're looking at the younger user cohort here. We see that in our worldwide consumer survey, and especially in the U.S., the 18-34-year-olds are most likely to fall for a scam. Their activity level online is so much heavier than the next cohorts, the older cohorts that they are exposed to more, and their willingness to pay out of all age groups is the highest. This is completely, let's say, novel that the younger generations are now more likely to be paying for this kind of a service. What we're doing here is that we're naturally taking that younger generation into account in how we design the service, how it talks to people, and how we will present it to people, and what kind of channels we will be using to find the consumers for this. We will start from the existing customer base we got in the U.S. through the Lookout Life acquisition. That's the first customer base that we will be going after with this new product. The public launch is planned at the end of quarter three, in September. When we get together next time for a quarterly results session in October, we're going to give you the first few weeks experiences of how the service has been trending. It's an AI-first development approach that we've been using. It's an AI-native team that is building all of this. We've gone through the alpha phase, and now we are just about to start the external beta. We're far along the line, and as said, brand work is underway. Our objectives and key results are these that we use in F-Secure. Successfully serve, scale, and grow every strategic partner, unlock full growth potential in every partner, Data, AI, and new ways of working, driving innovation and growth. What did we achieve in quarter two? We have significantly increased the number of subscribers that we're serving within the strategic partner sector, and we've launched services both with Verizon and extension with NTT DOCOMO, as said, and the service uptake of AT&T's financial monitoring has continued on a positive trajectory. On the second one, we launched a new tier to our Scam Protection service. We call it Scam Protection Premium, which is going to be getting new capabilities for a separate monthly fee that users will be getting. We are now in the beta launch of what we call passwordless login for Total. Why does this matter? It matters because every single time you ask a user who is a new user to a service to set up a new account and especially a new password, that becomes a speed bump in the road. Now we are going to be in a position, at the end of this year, especially in quarter four, to start rolling this capability out to our partners who are selling Total to help them drive up their customer adoption and customer acquisition. We see that Total subscriber count is back to growth. We were having some headwinds in the first quarter, but it's clearly back to growth now. Our partner success playbooks and the meticulous implementation of those is paying dividends. In Data, AI, and new ways of working, we are expanding all the time the AI-native nature of our development in technology. Every single quarter, we have one or two new teams who are moving into this new model. We now have a good number of them already in use, we can clearly see that depending on how many people you have, now we have maybe double, triple, quadruple number of resources because of agentic AI that they're leveraging. AI transformation across the company's core processes is ongoing. Finance, sales, support on all fronts. Legal has been there for already for quite some time. One example is the leadership team. Much of our strategy work, our planning work is all done in a heavily AI-powered manner these days. We have also started expanding our data visibility towards our partners. Our partners want to be able to perceive value towards or provide visible value to their customers of the security service that they're providing. Now we're giving them data so that they can communicate towards the consumers what the service is doing for them. That's all from me right now. Now for the first time in a quarterly results session, I'll hand over to our Chief Financial Officer, Robin Pulkkinen. Hello, everybody. Like Timo said, I'm Robin Pulkkinen, the Group CFO for a couple 2.5 months now. I started early May. Happy to be here today. I'll go through a bit more detail, the numbers, what Timo partly also covered here. Finally now, we're being able to move into growth phase as a company. Roughly 10% currency neutral growth for the second quarter. For the first half, we're now roughly 6% growth. Our revenue guidance remains unchanged. We're guiding 7%- 12% growth this year, which basically converts to the expectation that the second half and the Q3, Q4 should be also growing quite nicely. When it comes to profitability, it's not really sustainable and acceptable that even though the top line grows fast, the results or the profits have been going down. On the flip side of the coin is actually just like we expected it to go or happen. We have intentionally been investing in the embedded business and related service capabilities. Our midterm targets are still unchanged. Once we reach roughly EUR 200 million in revenue, our adjusted EBITA is expected to be around 40% or approaching 40%. Now we're at the second quarter, roughly at 28%. If the second quarter is EUR 40 million in sales, basically by the time we reach EUR 50 million in sales or annually EUR 40 million higher than the run rate currently, that additional EUR 40 million needs and will be coming in with a very high margin, that's something that the management and the leadership team is putting a lot of effort in and making sure that happens. This has been the good news is that this actually just like we planned more or less what the first half has been delivering. On the cash flow, there was maybe a slight surprise that there has been some temporary collection issues with some of the related to certain organization changes in some of the major customers of ours. That is being handled, and nothing permanently going to be missing, but it has just taken a bit longer than we expected. On the partner channel, you can see here also clearly that the embedded security has been growing significantly, almost 80% year-over-year in the second quarter, while the Security Suite, like Timo said, has been slightly down. Most of the efforts and focus has been, of course, in the embedded in the recent quarters, which also plays here. Going forward, we are looking to moving to a more balanced strategy when it comes to both of the main businesses. The FX has been playing against us a bit there. The U.S. dollar is 9% down on annual year-to-date average exchange rates and Japanese Yen down 14%, which also has an impact on the numbers. Something popped up on the screen. Okay. Direct channel revenue, actually doing a lot better than we originally planned and anticipated. There has been basically no paid customer acquisition investments done. It has actually been interesting to see that out of the 4.5% currency-neutral drop, it is all coming from the North American legacy product customers. For these customers, we are planning to launch the new Halo later this year and hope to be able to change that trend going forward. We are moving more investments also into the direct channel. A lot of that bleeding can be cornered in the North American side of the business. What comes to the whole group different geographies, basically North America here again, you can see strong growth driven by the embedded business. Rest of Europe, it is slightly down. There is one bigger customer in Germany that we have still had some problems with, and if that was able to be kept flat, we would have been also more or less flat on the year-over-year change in rest of Europe. Nordics pretty stable and Japan also quite stable. Just the currency has had a big impact on the numbers. The expense side, which I have seen that the investor community has been talking about a bit. There has been these known investments into the embedded business, and the R&D has been going up quite a bit. EUR 2.8 million increase in the operating expenses, 75% of that is related to additional headcount and related salaries. That is the area where the cost increases have been coming. Like Timo said, we do not foresee any additional OpEx increases in the coming quarters or years. We should be pretty good with the cost base we have. The longer historical trend the good news on the gross margin is that it is euro-wise the best quarter we have had as an independent company. The percentage also went up slightly from Q1. The embedded business, like we are known, is slightly lower gross margin than the Security Suite business, but we have efforts ongoing to try and improve that from the level even where we are today. The adjusted EBITA trend you can see has been coming down. The third quarter, typically, if you look at the historical graphs, the Q3 is slightly normally better because the vacation periods in the countries where the vacation accruals are released, the OpEx base is slower. That probably something we could expect for Q3 as well this year. For the whole first half, summarizing 6% currency neutral growth. Q1 was 2% growth, we went from 2%-6% with the addition of Q2. Also the embedded direct channel slightly down and the partner channel up. The EBITA also down like we've seen in the earlier slides. Operating cash flow, especially the cash conversion, and the cash flow was impacted quite a bit by the increased AR. The working capital did not go very favorably from our point of view. That's an area that we hope to fix during the next months and don't foresee any bigger kind of challenges or risks when it comes to collection of the money. The main shareholders. Risto is still the main shareholder. No change in the ownership over last year. SCB has been increasing quite a bit. They've acquired more than 4 million shares over the last 12 months. You have Aktia and Proprius Partners and Säästöpankki also adding shares over the last 12 months. Citibank of the top 10 is the only investor who has sold some shares during the year. The guidance remains unchanged. We expect the revenue to grow 7%-12% and the adjusted EBITA to be between EUR 44 million and EUR 50 million for the year. Thank you, Robin. Lots of hands. We have hands up over here in the room. Felix Henriksson from Nordea. A few questions from me. I think in the report you wrote that a stronger focus on Embedded Security over the recent quarters contributed to a moderate decline in Security Suite revenues. How should we think about this going forward? Is there sort of, in a way, a revenue stream cannibalization when you focus more on Embedded Security as opposed to Security Suite, or can both of those revenue streams grow at the same time? Okay. The short answer is absolutely not. Embedded Security and Security Suite do not cannibalize each other at all in terms of our business. Embedded Security is a new business area for us, and these are customers who would not take F-Secure Total or Security Suite products. From that perspective, they do not cannibalize. They compete for the same internal resources when we're working, for instance, on the requirements to develop our platforms and backend services. That's what we're referring to. We've been focusing quite a bit of the backend development efforts towards service maturity, service level, resilience, cybersecurity, and so forth in the past quarters. Now that we're starting to be in a really good position in that front, we are able to release more of those capabilities to develop further the Security Suite offering. Got it. On the cost side of things, you mentioned that there aren't any large incremental OpEx investment needs. Is this true even if you continue signing new top Tier 1 CSP partners so that you can replicate the existing stack that you have to serve those companies? Yeah. One of our key results under the first objective, which is to drive the strategic partner growth, is that we have an extremely high reusability of the code and the services that we have developed. So far, that's precisely how it's going. We don't see necessary OpEx increases if we win new partners, nor extensions to existing partners. It's good to hear. Finally, on the gross margin front, Robin, you mentioned that you also have initiatives ongoing to improve that side of things, even though the Embedded Security gross margins are a bit lower from a structural standpoint. Can you elaborate a bit on those actions? Yeah. We're working with our engineering team, for example, optimizing the hosting for R&D side and the production side. We've been seeing actually early results there, and we're quite optimistic on how that's going to continue to develop, for example, in the future. Of course, we have pretty big costs on the third party R&D, our kind of feeds or the royalties. We're looking at those contracts also quite in detail. We have a separate process ongoing for that. With those, we're pretty optimistic that we can have a good impact on the percentage and how it's going to develop going forward. Sounds good. Thanks. That's all from me. Hi, it's Matti Riikonen, DNB Carnegie. A couple of questions also related to the costs. You have increased fixed cost this year to basically launch the new services and keep the service levels at the good level. What happens in 2027? Is there anything unusual or extra in those 2026 costs that will be not there in 2027? Or is this just that you have established a new cost level to provide the services, and the cost level as such will remain the same pretty much in 2027? Of course, if you add more customers, then you gain more revenue and costs probably don't increase. If we assume that the current customer level is what it is and the costs have now risen and you have probably hired more people, are they the same in 2027 or is there a chance that the costs would decline? I'm talking about fixed costs now. We'll probably get back to that in more detail when we give the guidance for next year. When you think about if we're at EUR 160 million run rate now, 27% adjusted EBITA. When you add EUR 40 million more, we should be able to increase the EBITDA percent by 13%, more or less. Clearly, there's very little, if any, room for any cost additions over the longer period of time. We're a bit limited to be able to comment exactly how next year OpEx is going to be out. Yeah. It goes without saying that we're very actively planning all kinds of actions to take OpEx down in many different ways. How that will end up and what kind of guidance we will go for next year and what kind of plan we build for ourselves. We're getting our growth going now, we absolutely want to keep that momentum for as many quarters as we want to count forward. Yes, we are looking at different ways to manage operating expenses. More about that later, like Robin says. All right, thank you. The second one is related to gross margin and of course, the materials and services cost, which is also slightly higher. Should we expect that Qutwo materials cost and services and materials is representative for other quarters in this year as well? It is now what it is, or does it also increase if the number of customers using those services increases? Yes, of course, they will go up if the usage for those services or feeds goes up. We do have quite a few initiatives ongoing where we're also trying to cut other areas of the cost of sales. In a way, it probably comes with the guidance again, we don't see any massive shift from the gross margin, at least downwards anymore. It's probably not going to be 90% either next year. We're working around that and don't have an exact answer for you. We have a number of initiatives ongoing that's going to help us manage that. All right. Those initiatives are actually showing pretty good results initially. That Robin referred to on the cost of sales. All right. Then thirdly, could you remind us how does the minimum revenue levels work? When you start or launch a service, does it include a volume range? When you ramp from zero to something, is that something included before you actually start to get more revenue from more subscribers? Yeah. We've talked about this at a few events before. The way that it works is that it is not a rule that we have guaranteed minimum fees in our deals. That's not a rule. There are many where we do have them in major partners and even strategic partners. Typically, I would say more commonly, they ramp up as the usage goes up. What you typically have is that when the usage is, for instance, from zero to 1 million subs, the price for a service is at this level, and then it may slightly go down as the usage goes up. That's typically how it goes. For instance, in DOCOMO's case, the Deepfake Detection and Scam Protection services depends on the number of users that they are able to sign up for the service. All right. Thank you. I was mainly thinking that when you launch a new service, how quickly you would end up in a territory where you end up booking more revenue, not just the minimum guaranteed revenue in those contracts where there is one. Yeah. Contract in mind is Verizon. We see that there is a real opportunity for us to work together with them to drive the service uptake and exceed those minimums. All right. Thank you. That's all from me. Hi, it's Atte Riikola from Inderes. First, about the revenue growth in H2. Are you expecting meaningful revenue growth from other Tier 1s than Verizon in the rest of the year? Verizon is the primary driver, no doubt about it. We are clearly expecting growth also from others. For instance, the names that I mentioned earlier, AT&T is doing fine with financial monitoring. DOCOMO is on the up and up with their new services. SoftBank numbers are developing positively. SoftBank and DOCOMO are number-wise clearly smaller than our U.S. partners, though, so that needs to be kept in mind. In major partners, we're also seeing moderate growth. That consists of a large number of players. Some are up, some may be down, so the final result is always a matter of how things balance out. Can you remind us about that unnamed Tier 1 that now the service launch has been delayed. What kind of deal you have with that? Have you said anything about the size of that deal already? We haven't said anything about the size of the deal. There is a non-recurring engineering fee that we are charging from the partner. The project is ongoing, but unfortunately, their launch schedule and some of the resources have not been allocated. We are recognizing the NRE, the non-recurring engineering fee already. That was booked in December. Other than that, nothing right now. When the service is launched, is it going to start from zero with subscribers or? Yes Okay. Based on what we know today. Still about that Security Suite business, you mentioned that more balanced commercial and product efforts. What does it mean in practice? I'll refer back to Felix's question here. We've been prioritizing heavily, especially in the platform and cloud capabilities, the kinds of things that have been necessary for the Tier 1 segment, because the growth is pretty massive on that front. Now that we are out with Verizon and other services are proceeding well, we can now allocate more of resources on the technology and services side to work on the Security Suite related opportunities. That's what it means. We go back to normal, let's put it that way. In the history, I think you have always talked about Security Suite business, that it's still like a growth business. Are you still expecting it to be a growth business, or is it now more on a stable phase? We absolutely want it to grow every single year. Absolutely. The typical question about Germany, how's the situation? Is it still getting worse, or is there any signs of improvement? It's in a way chugging along in those negative numbers, which are getting smaller negative numbers over time as the customer base has been decreasing. Other than that, nothing new really. The risk over time is getting smaller. Yeah. About the F-Secure Trust, if you think about the competitive landscape, has any of your competitors launched already similar kind of services? I think at least Norton had something related to AI. Yeah. I would say that any self-respecting consumer cybersecurity company has some initiatives on the AI side. The way that we are solving or aiming to solve certain trust gaps and the kind of shape that our products are taking, those are unique. Now it remains to be seen whose approach is the one that gets most traction in the market. I would say that we are in a very developed stage with our concepts that we're going after. At least they have resonated in an excellent manner amongst our partners when we launched it at the end of May at our global partner event. Last question to Robin. The CapEx level dropped in Q2 compared to Q1, so how do you see it developing in H2? It's probably not going to go back to the higher levels like last year anymore. I think we are now probably at a level that we could maybe something similar or slightly higher maybe at the end of the year, but no massive change now on that level from where we are today. We're not going to see anything starting with a four like we had at some quarters. All right. Thank you. Matti Riikonen, DNB Carnegie. One question still about the Security Suite and the revenue decline. If there has now been issues with resources, competence internally, and you have seen that revenue has come down due to some specific cases, how long a lead time do you think that it will take before you can return to the growth? Typically, these trend changes take some time, but what is your estimate of the lead time before it can grow again? I think I referred in passing to the fact that we have grown our Security Suite subscriber numbers now in the first half. At the end of quarter one, we were in a minus. Now we're clearly in a positive number in quarter two. Revenue is trailing. As Robin mentioned earlier, the product that we've been serving the direct business customers in the U.S. has seen a lot of churn. It's a product from three years ago, roughly. Now we're going into a new product. Once that is out, we will see in the following months, I would say during the fourth quarter, if we can actually plug that hole so that churn would end. That's what we're looking for. Naturally, to turn it to growth. That's the biggest single one. All right. Thank you. We've actually referred earlier that we've had some headwinds even in Finland and in Poland. In the market, we're seeing those getting better now, back to growth. All right. Thank you. Do we have any questions online? Yes. On the Verizon deal, it has a minimum guarantee for the next 18 months. What about after that? Are there any guarantees? It's guaranteed from now on out. As long as we have the agreement in place with Verizon, those $15 million for a full year revenue, that's guaranteed. That stays. Yes. Naturally, we are working extremely hard to take it way beyond that. On the F-Secure Trust, is it more about defending your market share rather than gaining growth? What's the expected revenue impact in 2027? It's not at all about defending our market share. It is all about going for a new market, which is related to super fast spreading use of AI assistance and AI powered or AI agents, agentic activities that consumers will be facing. This is a growth opportunity for us. How much growth we will be expecting from this? I'm looking forward to giving more information on that front towards the end of this year, early next year, once we have our products in a more mature state than where they are now. We don't provide that kind of predictions at this moment in time. On the profitability side, what can you do to improve profitability in the short term with less than EUR 200 million revenue? Well, profitability won't jump the day we hit the top line. We have to start today. There's a number of actions which we kind of, it's not really public information what we're planning to do. We'll maybe talk more about that towards the end of the year. We're starting today. We're not waiting that we're over 190 and starting then. It's a gradual road. Yeah. I would say that just on higher level, naturally, revenue growth is a very substantial matter in all of this. Higher revenue level with constant OpEx or smaller OpEx is naturally giving us better profitability, and we are working on cost of sales all the time to drive that down in relative terms. Those are the kinds of actions that we are taking without delving into further detail. Okay. That was it for the online questions. Very good. If no further questions from the room, then I thank everybody for joining the session today, and we will see latest again towards the end of October when we will be releasing our quarter three results, right? Yeah. That's right. Thank you, Robin and Tiia. Thanks, everybody online. Thanks, everybody here in the room. Have a wonderful summer. Thank you.