Good morning, everyone, and welcome to Konecranes Q2 Earnings Conference. My name is Kiira Fröberg, and I'm the Head of Investor Relations at Konecranes. Here with me today, I have our President and CEO, Anders Svensson, and our CFO, Teo Ottola. Before we start, I would kindly remind you that our presentation contains forward-looking statements. Next, Anders and Teo will walk you through our Q2 results. Anders will start by presenting the group numbers, after which Teo will focus on our business segments. As always, we will host a Q&A in the end of the presentation. Please, Anders, now it's your turn. Thank you very much, Kiira Fröberg. Also, a warm welcome from my side to this second- quarter result webcast from Konecranes. I'll start with summarizing the second quarter. We say that this is a sustained, strong performance. Our orders increased on a year-on-year basis and exceeded EUR 1 billion at almost EUR 1.1 billion. The demand environment remained good, despite the weakened economic macro indicators. We had order growth in Service and Port Solutions. Our sales increased 19% in comparable currencies. Our delivery capability continued to be as efficient as it was in the first quarter. Some deliveries were postponed by customers due to site readiness. Also, our own global supply chain challenges hindered some deliveries to be made at the end of the second quarter. The strong order intake then resulted in a positive book-to-bill, and we closed the quarter at EUR 3.4 billion order book. The strong sales execution resulted in a record-high second quarter comparable EBITDA margin for the group at 10.8%. That was mainly driven by higher sales volumes and pricing. The profitability improved in Service and in Industrial Equipment, and was close to the previous year within Port Solutions. As a summary, we are really happy with the sustained strong performance in the second quarter. I now walk into the macro environment, and I start with some macro indicators for Service and Industrial Equipment. You can see that the capacity utilization rate, both in the EU and the U.S., is down on a year-on-year comparison. The manufacturing PMIs, if you start with the global one, it's down for the 10th consecutive month, and in EU, it's down for the 12th consecutive month in contraction. I think it was the lowest rating since May 2020. Also in the U.S., it was in contraction, while we had an expansion in China and India. Brazil remained below the 50 mark, also in contraction. Here I normally also mention the utilization of our connected equipment at customer sites via the TRUCONNECT. Here we can measure the productive lifts at customer site, and we can see that it's about 5% down from the previous year, more flat sequentially than. I move into the main demand driver in ports, and that's the Global Container Throughput Index. Here, it's down on a year-on-year comparison, but you can see sequentially, it's a bit up from the first quarter. I move into the group order intake, and we ended the quarter at EUR 1,093 million, and that's an increase then of 3.5% in comparable currencies. The increase was in Service and Port Solutions, while we saw a small decrease in the Industrial Equipment, external order intake of about 2%. We had an increase in Americas and a decrease in EMEA and APAC. Our net sales increased on a year-on-year comparison with 19%, and we ended the quarter at EUR 913 million. We saw here an increase in all three segments and also an increase in all three regions. If we look at the segment mix, we had an increase in Service of about 17% and in external sales for in Industrial Equipment of 20% and ports of 20%. In the group, we had a negative mix impact in the quarter versus the previous year. I mentioned that we had a positive book-to-bill in the quarter, and we ended the quarter then at EUR 3.411 billion of order book, and that is up then 25% in comparable currencies versus the previous year. We saw an increase in all three segments on a year-on-year basis. We also see here, sequentially, an increase of the order book of about 4.5% in comparable currencies. I'm moving to the group comparable EBITDA, and we delivered EUR 98.3 million for the quarter, and that's up 61% then versus the second quarter in the previous year, and that enabled us then to deliver a margin of 10.8%, and that is up 300 basis points versus the margin in the previous year. The comparable EBITA margin increased in Service and Industrial Equipment, and it decreased slightly in Port Solutions. The comparable EBITA increase is mainly due to then higher sales volumes and pricing. We also saw our gross margin increase, which is not maybe a surprise, since in the second quarter, in the previous year, we were challenging with inflation versus pricing, and now we made that up. This is a new slide that we are showing, and it's to track ourselves versus our newly communicated financial targets from the Capital Markets Day in May, earlier this year. Here we track the group versus comparable EBITA margin of 12%-15%, and then Service, 20%-24%, and Industrial Equipment, 8%-10%, Port Solutions, 9%-11%. We will continue to show you this slide going forward, so we can track where we are in terms of traction of our profitability improvements. We now look into the demand outlook for the third quarter, and the worldwide demand picture remains subjective volatility and uncertainty, also now going forward. Within the industrial customer segments, we basically say the same as we did for the second quarter. Our demand environment within industrial customer segment has remained good and continues on a healthy level. Despite the weakened macro indicators and some signs of weakening in all three region. It's the same here. We refer to some signs of weakening in decision-making time, in larger CTO projects or ETO projects, for example, but also with the macro environment uncertainties that we have around the world. Otherwise, the sales funnel continues to be good and healthy within industrial side. We have the same sort of number of cases, same sort of value of the sales funnel, and we also have a good influx of new cases into the funnel. With the import customers, we say that the global container throughput continues on a high level, and long-term prospects related to global container handling remains good overall. Here we are adding a second sentence. That said, we have started to see hesitation in decision-making in the short term among some of the port's customers. Here also, the sales funnel in ports is strong. We have all from short cyclic to more longer cyclic port cranes to projects, smaller, medium, and really large projects. They are still there in the sales funnel as the previous quarters. What we are referring to here is that large projects are by nature, lumpy, and we are not foreseeing that any of those really large or mega mega projects will close in the coming sort of two quarters or so. This is the reason why we added the second part here. Then moving to the full- year guidance. The net sales is expected to increase in the full year of 2023 compared to the previous year, and also the comparable EBITA margin is expected to improve in the full year of 2023 versus the previous year. Overall, we are pleased with our sustained strong performance in the second quarter, and we continue to focus on cost control, sales execution, and strategy execution going forward. With that, I think I will leave to my colleague and CFO, Teo Ottola, to talk more about the financials and also the business segments. Please, Teo, go ahead. Thank you. Thank you, Anders. This next section, we can start with the group profitability bridge, so comparable EBITA bridge. When we take a look at this year's Q2 and compare that to the previous year's Q2, we have a comparable EBITA improvement of roughly EUR 37 million. When we take a look at the reasons for the improvement, the first part here is the volume, pricing, and mix section, in a way, EUR 87 million. Pricing impact year-on-year is between 8%-9%, which basically explains, say, EUR 60 million-EUR 70 million of that EUR 87 million bucket there. The remainder, say EUR 15 million-EUR 25 million, is then a net of volume and mix in this first part of the bridge. When we take a look at the variable cost and fixed cost within this bridge, both of these are actually a combination of cost inflation, as well as then, of course, the efficiency improvements that we have done throughout the year. One way of analyzing, of course, this is to take a look at the pricing impact of EUR 60 million-EUR 70 million and compare that to these variable and fixed cost increases that are altogether EUR 47 million. We have a positive net of, say, close to EUR 20 million as a result of those ones. In a way, the big picture is that if we take a look at the improvement, so the sheer volume improvement, the underlying volume improvement, brings maybe a little bit more than half of the improvement of EUR 37 million, whereas a little bit less than half of the improvement is due to the pricing and the efficiency improvements that we have achieved during the, let's say, last 12 months or so, if you wanna take a look at it that way. Translation impact is slightly negative in a year-on-year comparison. Next, we can take a look at the segments separately and start with Service. Service order intake, EUR 374 million. That is up 4.7% year-on-year with comparable currencies. We had an order intake increase in field service. Parts orders were approximately flat. If we take a look at it from the regions' point of view, we had increase in the Americas. We were approximately flat in EMEA, and a decrease in Asia Pacific. Agreement pace, EUR 314 million, that is up 4.8% in a year-on-year comparison with comparable currencies. The sales number, EUR 365 million, that is a very handsome increase of 17% year-on-year with comparable currencies. There was growth both in field service and parts. We had increase in all of the regions as well. Good to note here that even if the order intake is growing significantly less than the sales, so sales growth is higher, still, book-to-bill is about one. Which has meant that the order book also for Service has continued to go up, and we have EUR 477 million at the end of the second quarter of this year in the, in the order book. Comparable EBITA is very good, EUR 71 million, that is 19.5% of sales. The reasons are, of course, the underlying volume improvement, so the higher sales, even netted with inflation. Of course, the combination of pricing and our own internal efficiencies, as discussed already in connection with the group EBITA bridge as well, and cross-margin improved as well in a year-on-year comparison. Industrial Equipment is next. Our order intake, EUR 348 million, that is down 8% comparable currencies year-on-year. If we take a look at the external orders, which may be more tells about the Industrial Equipment demand, as such, that is down only 2% year-on-year with comparable currencies. When we take a look at the year-on-year change, we have a decrease in components, we have a decrease in process cranes, but we have an increase in standard cranes from the order intake point of view. Regionally, Americas did well. There is an increase, but we have a decrease both in EMEA and APAC. When we take a look at the sequential development within the order intake, Q1 of this year was obviously very good for Industrial Equipment. Our order intake is basically down in all of the BUs from Q1 to Q2, even though if we take a look at the standard cranes, one could maybe be able to say that they are more or less on the same level between Q1 and Q2. Net sales were EUR 330 million, that is 23% up year-on-year comparable currencies. External sales up almost 20% in a year-on-year comparison. There was increase in basically all of the BUs. There was increase in all of the regions as well. Here also, order book is slightly higher than what it was a year ago. Of course, one has to remember that we sold the industrial product business during the second quarter, and of course, part of the order book was moved to the buyer as a result of that deal. Small technical change there as well. When we take a look at the EBITA, that was EUR 18 million or 5.4%. A good, very good improvement year-on-year, which is for, basically for the same reasons as in Service as well. The underlying sales volume is significantly higher. At the same time, of course, the combination of pricing and our own optimization programs are improving the result. Like Anders already mentioned, particularly the second quarter of last year was still suffering quite a bit from the pricing issues. We had been late with certain price increases earlier. Now that this has been corrected, gross margin has increased, and it is, of course, visible in the EBITA as well. We have a small sequential decline in the margin from Q1 to Q2. Good to remember that in the sales, we have actually the last delivery, crane delivery to Russia, which is from the accounting point of view, profitable in the second quarter. The corresponding losses one year ago were booked in adjustments, and now also the profit is in items affecting comparability, so it's not visible in comparable EBITA, whereas sales is included, and this of course, dilutes the margin to a certain extent. Port Solutions order intake on a very good level, EUR 420 million. That is an improvement of 5.7% year-on-year of the regions' increase in the Americas, decline in EMEA, and APAC. If we take a look at year-on-year comparison by business units, lift trucks are down when we take a look at, for example, port cranes and solutions, these have actually been doing well in a year-on-year comparison. I guess, maybe sequentially, taking a look at this as well, Q1, of course, was a very good order intake quarter for ports as well. Maybe worth just noting regarding Q1 and Q2, so that, also sequentially, lift truck orders declined. Net sales were EUR 278 million. That is an increase of almost 20% in a year-on-year comparison. It could have been actually even more. We had a little bit timing issues towards the end of the second quarter, so some deliveries slipping to the next quarter. But a good improvement there as well. Of course, order book at a very high level, book-to-bill has been tremendously about one all the time, and we are almost at EUR 2 billion order book at the end of the second quarter. Comparable EBITDA, here also actually EUR 18 million, 6.6% margin. The EBITDA margin has a slight decline in a year-on-year comparison. This is primarily as a result of product mix, so we have a very different product mix from the deliveries point of view now than what we had a year ago. It also impacts our gross margin, which is on a lower level than what it was a year ago. A couple of comments on the cash flow and balance sheet before we go into the Q&A. Networking capital and free cash flow here. Networking capital was EUR 424 million. That is 11.4% of rolling twelve-month sales. It is below 12%, and we have given 12% as our new target level to be below that, so we are just barely there. Also, the relation is better than what it was a year ago and better than it what was at the end of Q1, so we are definitely going in the right direction. Worth noting is that the inventories have continued to go up during this year, particularly or specifically work in progress. That is as a result of book-to-bill having been as good at it as it has been. The advanced payments from customers have compensated for that from the networking capital point of view, and also from the cash flow point of view. Free cash flow has continued to be good in the second quarter, as in Q1 as well, so on a relatively similar level, the reasons are also the same: improving profitability, let's say, neutral to beneficial networking capital development during the whole of 2023 so far. Gearing and return on capital employed, net debt was EUR 620 million at the end of the quarter. We did pay dividends during the second quarter, gearing 43%, a good level for us. Of course, when we take a look at the return on capital employed, this has now developed very positively during Q1 and Q2, not because of lower capital tied as a result of the inventory as discussed, but as a result of the profitability improvement that we have been able to achieve. This is actually the last slide of the presentation, and now we can move into the Q&A. Thank you, Teo. Like Teo said, now it's time for the Q&A. Questions can be asked either by telephone or by sending them to us through chat. Maybe we try to open the line and see if we have any questions by telephone. Please, operator, go ahead. If you wish to ask a question, please dial star five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial star five again on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Moyo Adebayo from Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. I've just got one this morning, and I was just wondering what you're seeing in terms of pricing carryover for the second half of this year. Thank you. I'm not 100% sure if I know what you mean with pricing carryover, but if we take a look at the pricing environment in general, so we can maybe note now that when we are discussing the PNL impact for the second quarter, so there the pricing impact was 8%-9%. In Q1 of this year, it was about 10%. The year-on-year pricing impact from the inflation point of view, of course, is trending downwards. This is something that has been in a way... it's maybe worth noting. If we take a look at the, let's say, specific positive impact that we have been receiving from the pricing, particularly regarding Industrial Equipment. It is so that the impact has been large now in Q1 and Q2. The positive year-on-year impact, because we have corrected the prices to be on a correct level from our point of view. Of course, that impact will be less in year-on-year comparison in Q3 and Q4 than what it has been in Q1 and Q2. There will be some impact still, at least in Q3, from the Industrial Equipment point of view. One can maybe say so that when we take a look at the overall level, we have been able to compensate for inflation in pricing, and we believe that we will continue to be able to compensate inflation with pricing in across all of the segments. Order book margins from the pricing point of view that we have, they are, from our point of view, on an okay level. Very clear. Thank you. Maybe next question, please, operator. The next question comes from Antti Kansanen from SEB. Please go ahead. Hello, it's Antti from SEB. A couple of questions on your profitability. If we start with Services, as you highlighted, you are now very close to the bottom end of your target range. On the CMD, this was a business that was mandated to grow. If we think about kind of margin progression going forward, do you expect to kind of start to add more fixed costs into the business, invest kind of a more into the growth? You are now kind of very close to a profitability level that you are satisfied right now. How should we think about that? Thanks, Antti. You know, in Service, we had a really strong profitability quarter. Service is really a volume business, so when we get volume, we get really good leverage. If you compare them to what we had in the second quarter in the previous year, that was a low volume quarter. It's really obvious in the result, also in last year that it was only 15.5%, I think. We are mandating Service to grow already now, because that would be a profitable growth to take us towards the profitability range that we are looking to achieve within that business. I wouldn't say that you need to add a lot of fixed cost into that business because now we have invested in tools and all the support systems and structures for the Service organization. Now it's more to invest more in Kocks and get more people on the ground to help us to grow that business going forward. All right. That's very clear. Perhaps secondly, on Industrial Equipment and ports, and again, reflecting to the CMD message, then, if we kind of believe the leading indicators and assume that there's a bit of a downturn coming in, if you think about the actions that are you doing, what type of actions do you have in place or kind of are now implementing that would allow you to grow your margins if you don't get the benefits of strong volumes and strong earnings leverage going into, let's say, next year and the year beyond that? Could you maybe open up about the things that you are doing to protect the bottom margin of those businesses? Yeah. We have the Industrial Transformation Optimization Program that we communicated about earlier, where we simplify sort of the go-to-market models, the product platforms, the way we operate internally between handover between different teams, et cetera. All of this is made to increase productivity, to increase the customer perception of our services and our products. We have a lot of things ongoing that will help us to be more productive and more efficient. At the same time, we shouldn't forget that in the last, I think, eight quarters or so, I think, the order intake has been larger than sales in all but one of those quarters. Still, also in this quarter, the order intake was larger than sales. We are not in a situation where we are seeing a huge volume drop or so. We also, as I communicated, seeing quite strong sales funnel within the Industrial Equipment side. Should something happen that we would see a more steep decline, we have contingency plans in place that we will launch in those cases, but we are not seeing that at the moment. All right. Then, then a last question from me is regarding demand, and I guess both end markets, but notably on industrial. Do you kind of you had a fairly stable development right now and have been on a good level, and, as you mentioned, the macro indicators are weakening. Is there a disconnect or do you think? What are you seeing from your clients? I mean, in Europe, the process industry is quite weak if you look at the headlines, but then your clients seem to be continuing to order. Could you maybe open up, what's your views on the stable demand picture that you are now seeing? In the Industrial Equipment side, we are serving very many different customer verticals. Even if sort of general engineering or general manufacturing would be weaker to some extent, which might very well be true, we still serve many other segments that are much stronger than. Waste to energy, metal, pulp and paper, wind energy, et cetera, which are all quite strong at the moment. That's the benefit with Industrial Equipment. We have a such a broad customer base that we work with within different sectors, so we're not so dependent on one specific sector. Like I said, we see in the, our sales funnel, the number of cases is constant with what we have seen in previous quarters. Also, the value of the sales funnel is also constant versus the previous quarters, and we also see a good influx of new cases into the sales funnel. Where we see the weakness is still on longer decision-making time on larger projects like ETOs and really big CTOs. All right. Thanks so much. Thank you. Next question, please, from the line. The next question comes from Panu Laitinmäki, from Danske Bank. Please go ahead. Thank you. I have three questions. firstly, coming back to the Services margin. I mean, what are your thoughts, sequentially going forward on the Services margin? If I look at your comments, it seems that the field service demand grew, but spare parts not. I guess there is salary inflation that is coming through. Do you expect the margin to kind of increase near term? What are your thoughts on this? Yeah, like we mentioned, we see that the Service is really a volume business. When we add volume, we get a very good leverage on that volume in terms of profitability. You're right, it was mainly field service that grew. Still you see the effect when we have field service growing as well, it really helps our margin to improve. We had nothing, sort of, one-off positive or anything in the quarter within Service. There... We don't see any reason why we shouldn't continue to grow this business as we target to do, and with that, to improve our profitability also going forward. Okay. The kind of mix change is not a huge headwind going forward? Of course, we want our spare parts to grow as well. That goes normally together with more together with the factors like capacity, utilization, manufacturing, and the number of productive moves, et cetera. Those are more connected to spare parts. There we. It's difficult not to follow the market trends. Of course, we will still aim to take market shares. As we communicated also in Capital Markets Day, we also have equivalent parts for other brands, so we can also, like Fröberg talked about, go in to take market shares from that perspective. Our ambition is, of course, to continue to take market shares as well. May, maybe regarding the- Okay, thanks. Sorry, maybe regarding the mix within the Service business. If we compare Q2 to last year's Q2, maybe we had a slightly better mix now, which maybe explains something of the profitability improvement that we saw now in a year-on-year comparison. When we take a look at the overall situation and the order intake now during the second quarter and its impact to the mix going forward, as you were asking. Of course, mix has an impact, but in Service, typically it is not so big that it would be in any way or in a way, somehow, mitigating the impact of the underlying volume development. It's nevertheless, so that the underlying volume development within Service is the one that brings the leverage. Mix is a factor, but not as much as it would be in the Industrial Equipment and Port Solutions. The order intake mix that we had in Q2 does not, by itself, have a huge impact on the margin going forward. Okay, thank you. Secondly, on your kind of delivery capacity in the Port Solutions, you have had a high book-to-bill for a while, and just to kind of trying to model your revenues, I mean, how much can you kind of deliver on a single quarter going forward, as there has been some volatility in the past quarters? We are targeting, of course, to grow our delivery capabilities. We are working on lift trucks to improve our delivery times to customers, of course. We normally should be at one quarter, and as we communicated, we are three to four quarters rather now. Here we are really ramping up our capacity to serve our customers better. On the larger project deliveries, those are not so much that we don't have capacity. Those are also placed long before the customer actually wants the deliveries. We saw one example that Teo mentioned also in this quarter, where a customer asked us to delay delivery into the third quarter because they were not ready at the site with preparations like electricity, et cetera. There's a combination here of ramping up our own capacity, ramping up our supply chain capacity, mainly then related to electronic components, et cetera, which is also impacting, I guess, other industries than us. To ensure that our customers are then ready to receive our deliveries. Okay, thank you. My final question is on competition and pricing of new orders. Basically, the question is that, have you seen for more or increasing price pressure in the new orders that you are taking in? It's a, I would say, a combination. We have had great acceptance from our customers on pricing. They understand that we can't absorb the inflation, and they do the same in their turn to their customers. That's kind of how the chain goes. We are not trying to squeeze more margin out of our customers due to pricing than what we had before, so we are trying to compensate inflation with pricing. We see in some areas that the pricing competition is increasing, and I would say that's primarily the APAC region is more hit than other regions. But in general, pricing has not been a big issue so far. Okay, thank you. That's all for me. Thank you. Let's take the next question from the line, please. The next question comes from Tomi Railo from DNB. Please go ahead. Tomi from DNB. I have a couple of questions, starting with the supply chain issues. If you could comment, where do you see those still impacting mostly the deliveries? Is it, is it ports? Is it the Industrial Equipment side? Start by that, so I'll get one by one. Yeah, I would say our supply chain situation has improved basically since mid-last year, and it continuously improve. Now we see that in Q2 for us, it was on a similar level as Q1, but going forward, we expect this to further improve. The supply chains are, however, still fragile, and it's in several areas. I would say electrical components is one area. Logistics can sometimes be still one area. We had some ships that were delayed in the end of the quarter, for example. There are still things, but I wouldn't say there's one particular thing that we can mention is the main issue. It's much better than it was 12 months ago, and we forecast that it will continue to improve further. Maybe one way to, in a way, give color on that one also would be regarding the Ports business, first of all. It, like we now discussed regarding Q2, these are mostly timing topics, so that they are customer is not ready, or shipping is not ready, or something like that. When we take a look at the Industrial Equipment area, and the situation is tremendously better than a year ago. That's clear, like Anders said. We have certain product categories where the lead times, from our point of view and from the customer's point of view, are longer than what we would like them to be. This is maybe an indication of the supply chain not being, in a way, fully normalized from the point of view that we will need to wait longer that we get the components. Then, in a way, the reliability is better, but the time to delivery is still long in certain product categories. This is maybe a way to, in a way, to describe the current situation. The fragility, what we are talking about is then maybe also related to that if there are sudden shocks in the supply chain, it can have an impact because still we have a lot of inventory, but we do not necessarily have a lot of spare inventory regarding the critical componentry because of some of the availability topics that are still there. All in all, the situation is much better than what it was, say, a year ago. Thanks for the color. You mentioned this one customer delay to the third quarter. Is it really one specific customer? You said site issues. Maybe on top of that, the question, have you seen customers or suppliers being financially distressed or anything on sort of that front? Yeah, that specific case that we mentioned is actually one customer with a fairly large delivery, where the customer was not ready with the electric installations at the site. We have agreed to delay delivery for that with the imports. We have not really seen, let's say, that kind of, let's say, financial stress impacting our customers directly. Of course, everybody's talking about higher interest rates and the, let's say, challenges in funding from that point of view. If we take a look at the postponements, there are not more than there would, say, normally be. If we take a look at the credit losses, they are on the same level as they were a year ago. We are maybe a bit more prepared than at the end of the year from the, let's say, provisions point of view. The difference is definitely not big, but anyway, a little bit. I mean, it's not something that would be clearly visible, at least not so far. No cancellations? Cancellations, yes, but no other than, let's say, normal level, one would say. Individual cancellations, yes, particularly in products that are, let's say, productized products, where the advanced payment situation is such that there are not that many advanced payments. Then, of course, we can also sell the equipment to somebody else, so it's a business model question. There are always some cancellations, but they haven't exploded in any way. It's the sort of normal way of operating from that point of view. Still on ports, if I may. Now, obviously, fairly steady first and second quarter sales site issue of one customer. Can you comment in any way second half deliveries timing? Is it more third or fourth quarter tilted, and then maybe the order book quality for the remainder of the year? Order book quality from our point of view is quite okay, as already said. From the margins point of view, we are comfortable with the level that we have. I would not maybe, rather go into the, let's say, quarterly forecasting from that point of view. Kiira is nodding not to go there. Of course, what we can repeat is what we have been saying earlier, and it is that as the beginning of last year was challenging from the deliveries point of view, and now we have been able to catch up during this year. Even if there is seasonality this year, the seasonality is much more modest than what it was, what it would be in a normal year. Of course, this is something that we can see between Q1 and Q2, already, so that the seasonality between those two quarters is not very strong. We are not saying that there wouldn't be seasonality, but it is maybe not as strong as it usually would be. Maybe on that front, also for the group level, I know quarterly guidances, but your margin has, of course, improved substantially, 350 basis points for the first half. Do you see that the margin can still improve in the second half year-over-year or have we seen the improvement for now? Tomi, before the gentleman answers, we have a couple of callers waiting for more questions, so this is then your last question, please. We mentioned already previously, you know, that the first half in 2022 was quite weak from two perspectives. One was supply chain issues and challenges enabled us not to have the sales execution that we wanted to have. The second one was the gap between inflation and pricing. Like Teo mentioned, we have compensated for the pricing situation. The delivery situation is much better than it was 12 months ago. We saw that difference in the first half of the year, so we don't expect to see the same difference in the second half of the year, because the second half of previous year was a much stronger one than the first half. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you, Tomi. Next caller, please. The next question comes from Tom Skogman from Carnegie. Please go ahead. Tom Skogman from Carnegie. I have three questions. First, on price hikes and order dynamics. I think you had the last price hikes in March. Was there an element of pre-buying in Q1 that, you know, hurt Q2 orders, you know, somewhat? Especially this dynamic with you selling components to other crane builders in this part. Yeah. Most likely, yes. Most likely, yes, there was to some extent that in Q1. Yeah. You had, then the opposite situation than in the previous year, where we had the price hike in the second quarter of 2022. You probably then had the situation in Q2 last year. Of the situation with the crane builders now, that by components, they have normal kind of inventories or so? Sorry, I didn't hear what you said. He asked about the crane builders, that the situation is normal when placing orders for components. That I think was the question. We don't have any dramatic price increases done in the second quarter for components for crane builders. That situation is more normalized this year than it was maybe in the second quarter in the previous year. Okay, my second question is about nearshoring and the U.S. IRA, kind of initiative. Do you see any kind of direct links to your orders from these two phenomenons? We think it's maybe a little bit early. There's a lot of talks. Of course, we see initiatives to some extent, but for us, the impact is extremely small, I would say so far. I mean, we have I think it's more planning in many instances than it is actual actions so far. I wouldn't say that that impacts us to a specific extent currently. I would like to get an update on the savings you have in Industrial Cranes and Services, when you combine them. What was the savings this quarter, and the number of employees that I can see now is down 5% year-over-year in Industrial Cranes? Will that continue down in coming quarters, despite the still healthy demand situation? When we take a look at the overall impact of the optimization savings program, we saw some, let's say, millions of euros in benefits in Q1. I guess that one can maybe say that we have added some millions on the level that we had for the Q1, but we are not really talking about a massive amount of benefits yet. It is part of these efficiencies that we have been talking about, particularly regarding Industrial Equipment, to some extent, also for Service. The program is ongoing, and it is according to the plan, and we are, in a way, getting additional benefits from one quarter to another one. I think, you know, the reduction in people that you mentioned is then primarily related to the divestment of the IPD business, as we communicated in April. The reduction from 16,600 people to 16,300 people is mainly related to that. Can you just help us to understand from a P&L perspective, can you build an EBIT bridge, you know, what are the savings this year, and what will they be next year from a P&L perspective? What is your best understanding now? We haven't so far shared the, let's say, timing on an annual or quarterly basis. We are only are giving in a way the back line for that one by which year. Of course, I mean, feedback received, so we will consider on how to do it going forward. At the moment, we do not have an exact plan to give you. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Next question from the line, please. The next question comes from Erkki Vesola from Inderes. Please go ahead. Hi, guys. It's Erkki from Inderes. Couple of questions. First, could you provide us with a ballpark figure for the pricing impact on your second half sales? I mean, what you see in your current order book. Sorry, can you repeat, Erkki? The pricing impact. Of your second half sales this year? I mean, based on your current order book, how many percent will that be? Okay, okay. That is an excellent question, but I'm afraid that we are not going to give an exact answer to that one. I think that when we take a look at the pricing impact overall, like said, Q1 was about 10%, Q2 was something between 8% and 9%. The impact will most likely be lower during the second half, but exactly which percentage it will be, so we will rather not share our view on that one. I'm not denying that we would not have a view, but we do not feel comfortable in sharing that at this point of time. It will be going down, but how much. Okay is the question. Almost linked to this, your material inflation and salary inflation trends for the second half. I mean, will the material cost and salary cost share of sales, will they evolve in either direction? The, now that we take a look at the material inflation, it has maybe unsurprisingly been moving quite much in line with the pricing. If we, if we have gone from, let's say, 10% to 8%-9%, you can see a corresponding decline in the material inflation. Salaries and wages inflation is much more stable, there we have been talking about 5% or more. Maybe from the Q1 to Q2, there was not a significant increase in salary inflation, which is obviously a good thing, we are roughly on the same level as we were in Q1. The overall, of course, view is that the material inflation would be coming quite a lot down going forward, whereas then the salaries and wages inflation would remain flattish or maybe even go up a little bit. These are working in probably in opposite directions to some extent. Okay, then finally, your net financials were pretty high in second quarter. Could you open up what was the part of net Forex and then other non-interest financials, and how the coming quarters look like? I mean, should we model in any extras also in Q3, Q4? The net Forex is primarily Swedish crown. It is the order book that we have in primarily in lift trucks, which is very sizable one, and the Swedish crown has been moving in the direction that it has generated a net negative in the financials. We are not applying hedge accounting in that business, that's why it is in the so-called normal P&L from that point of view. Of course, when the equipment is delivered, it will be, in a way, moving from one place to another one, compensating then the improved margin in the operation. That's the way that it works. Year-to-date impact of that one is it's not EUR 10 million, but it's close to EUR 10 million, so say EUR 9 million that we are having in the net FX as a result of that one. Overall financial items have increased maybe by EUR 14 million year to date, if you compare the EUR 9 million to the EUR 14 million, the rest is then interest increase as a result of the higher interest rates that we have now had as a result of the interest rate hikes. The overall EUR 10 million-EUR 15 million higher cost as a result of our debt burden is still, in a way, valid for the whole year. Effects. Yeah, okay. Your question is that can we forecast the effects? Unfortunately, no. It is depending on where the FX rates then move. Okay. Thank you so much. Thank you, Erkki. We have a couple of questions through the chat function, so maybe we should take them now. The first one is on the heavy industrial cranes margin, so I think referring to process crane margin. Can you break out the margin in the heavy industrial cranes? Is that a significant driver of margin improvement in this business segment? No, not really. I think if we take a look at the margin improvement, it is primarily elsewhere in the business. That is, of course, not of course, but probably primarily as a result of the timing in a way. When we make changes in the pricing or in the operations, the lead time from action to improvement is shorter in components and standard cranes than what it is in the process cranes. The overall lead time from the process crane point of view is longer, and that's why the primarily the improvement is in the shorter cycle parts of the business. We have a question on Cargotec. What is situation with Cargotec? Maybe I can cover this one. There isn't really a situation with Cargotec. The planned merger was canceled already in March last year due to the U.K. CMA blocking the merger. If you have any Cargotec-related questions, they should probably be directed to Cargotec's IR team. We have a question on orders in ports. "So your ports orders have exceeded sales in Port Solutions for the seventh consecutive quarter. How long do you expect this to continue? That's a good question. What we are saying now in the updated demand forecast is that we see some hesitation in the short term on closing the larger projects that we have seen in the past couple of quarters. Basically, we got one of those mega orders per quarter, and we don't see that now coming in the next two quarters or so. As I mentioned, they're still in the funnel, but we don't see them closing in the next two quarters or so. Then underlying, let's see, I think we still have a good demand picture, as we mentioned, in all areas. We are working hard on ramping up our delivery capabilities, as I mentioned, both in our internal manufacturing capacity, in our supply chains, and in our outsourcing partners' capacity, to really improve our delivery capability to serve our customer in a better way, with shorter lead times, et cetera. It's impossible question to answer, but we are doing what we can to improve our delivery capabilities. I understand we still have one more question in the line, so please, operator, let's take the one last question. The next question comes from Antti Kansanen from SEB. Please go ahead. Yeah, thanks. Thanks for the follow-up question opportunity. It was actually a question on your ports backlog, which is obviously substantially up year-over-year, but as you mentioned, you have had these kind of a large project orders in there with kind of a very long delivery time. Is there any way to communicate what kind of the backlog increase is for next year's deliveries versus what it was last year or for one year forward? Talk a little bit about how long or kind of the backlog is today, what it was perhaps a year ago? Yeah, thanks, Antti. We don't do that on a quarterly basis. We do that, I think, once a year in the annual report, but we don't do it on a quarterly basis. Okay, I'd assume that it's not only inflation and kind of a longer delivery times that has caused the backlog to increase, that there's also quite substantial growth if you, if you think about your revenue recognition for next year. No. Volume, let's say, impact. There is a substantial volume impact in the order intake, in the backlog. Maybe again, if one thinks about the additional color regarding this order book, of course, when we take a look at the delta between now and the last year, of course it is primarily Ports, as you, I think, pointed out. There is an improvement in Service and Industrial Equipment as well, but it's maybe EUR 10s of millions when if you take a look at the Ports, it's EUR 100s of millions, and I think that quite right. If we take a look at the split of that order book, how much is for this year in a year-on-year comparison, how much is for the next year in a year-on-year comparison? Of course, the vast majority of the increase in the order book is for next year. In a way, from that point of view, it will be supporting port sales next year. Perfect. Then I'll squeeze in the last question. This is mainly, I guess, on Industrial Equipment. You mentioned kind of supply chain issues are easing up. Most likely your lead times or delivery capabilities improving. Prices are not coming up anymore. Are your customers kind of in a wait-and-see mode, some of them waiting for your lead times to kind of shorten and getting back to normal order patterns, not the extraordinary high, long delivery times as we saw last year and so forth? Any hesitancy from that front? No, I don't think there's any hesitant from our customers in that perspective. I mean, we have improved our lead times basically since, yeah, end of last year, quite significantly in some parts. We have, of course, still on components, maybe we are one quarter more than we would like to be. We're normally within one quarter, so maybe from a component side, it's a little bit longer lead time than normal. I think CTOs, or standard cranes are back to normal lead times, and I think the process cranes are also back to normal lead times, basically. Great! Thanks. Thank you, Antti. Hey, we are already on overtime, so, thank you for all the questions and, both through line and then also in the chat function. As a reminder, Q3 interim report comes out on October 25, and, we will then meet by latest then. Now it's time to thank you all, and have a great day and summer, everyone. Thanks. Thanks. Bye. Thank you. Thank you very much. Bye-bye.