Welcome also on my behalf to this six months earnings release. Let's start with a few highlights from first half and Q2. Our net sales in Q2 were EUR 207 million compared to EUR 219 a year ago. This was mainly due to the fact that our renewable energy sources business is now reported below the operating profit. Swedish crown weakened quite significantly compared to the previous year, and its impact was over EUR 6 million to net sales. Our adjusted operating profit was EUR 9.2 million compared to EUR 11 million. I'll get into the reasons behind that a little later during the presentation. Our facility services, Finland, and also industrial services, continued their good performance in the first half and also in the Q2 as environmental services and facility services Sweden had a softer quarter. Also for those, I will get later during the presentation. Our net cash in the first six months was strong, and our financial position is strong. We managed to release quite nicely capital from the net working capital, and our plan is to continue on that path. Let's move on to net sales, as you can see, pretty much all of our businesses were in line with previous year, excluding industrial services, which increased by EUR 7.3 million. As I already mentioned, in Sweden, the weakened Swedish crown had a negative impact by EUR 6.6 million to the net sales. Renewable energy sources impact was EUR 34.1 million during the first six months, and now after end of June, the comparable numbers are then the same as we started reporting the renewable energy sources below the operating profit, first of July at 2022. Adjusted operating profit for the first six months, EUR 10.6 million compared to EUR 11 million adjusted operating profit. And here you can see that environmental, excuse me. Environmental services was lower than a year ago by some EUR 900,000, as industrial services and facility services, Finland improved quite nicely. In facility services, Sweden, we had quite a bit weaker performance in the first six months and I will go into the details as we go into the segment part of the presentation. We do have quite a bit of fluctuation quarter by quarter, and typically, Q1 is the weakest, and then slightly improving in the Q2, and then the Q3 is the biggest quarter for us, and then the Q4 is approximately at the same level as the Q2. This year is no exception to this quarterly fluctuation. Let's move on to the segment part of the presentation, and let's start with the environmental services. In environmental services, we saw a decline in demand in especially construction industry and to some extent in retail as well. Also we saw that the price levels for recycled raw materials were lower level than they were a year ago. In the second half, the difference will be smaller as the price level started to decline last year already. In environmental services, we also did have higher costs in the Q2. The collective agreement included a one-off payment for the drivers and that was visible in the numbers, as well as the heavy work that we did for our new operating system. That will continue till the end of the year, and next year we will start the piloting and rollout phase. I will explain a little bit more about the IT development that we are doing in the group later during the presentation. Our new government has, in our view, some very positive intentions in their program. Especially, the role of the municipal waste companies is going to be clarified, and their role will be focused on the household waste only. Unlike the situation currently, where the borders are somewhat vague, where the municipal waste companies operate. Also, there is an intention to improve the conditions for the recycling industry in general and increase the use of recycled raw materials, and also the environmental permit process should be streamlined. All of these changes, if implemented, and hopefully when implemented, will be very positive for Lassila & Tikanoja's businesses. In industrial services, we did have a strong first six months of the year, especially in the hazardous waste and environmental construction, the performance was good. In general, the environmental construction, we did win quite a few demanding projects, and those projects have proceeded according to the plans. In process cleaning, so far in the first six months, the demand has been stable and expected, but obviously there is a risk in the second half that there might be changes in the planned maintenance breaks, either to the, let's say, scope or timing of those maintenance breaks. We have a very good dialogue with our customers, and we expect that we can manage if there are changes in the second half of the year. In Sweden, the market situation is similar to Finland. Some of the process industries are suffering from lower demand, and therefore, we have had to work a little harder to find new customers, but so far it has continued quite well in Sweden. Overall, in industrial services, our position is strong and performance is very solid. In facility services, Finland, our positive development continued in the Q2, although the difference to the comparison period was a little smaller in the second half than it was. Sorry, in the Q2 than it was in the Q1. One reason for this is that also in facility services Finland, the new collective agreements came into force. Actually, they came into force already in May, and the salary increases were quite substantial. Our plan is to make price increases and focus on the efficiency to offset the impact of these pretty sizable salary increases. In Sweden, even though the numbers are not good for the first half of 2023, there is a lot of work that's been done behind the scenes, and actually, our turnaround plans are largely progressing according to the plans, and we do expect quite a nice improvement also in the financials when it comes to the second half of the year. Overall, even though the numbers are not very good in the first half, we expect to see visible results of our turnaround in Sweden already this year. Obviously, the full impact will be visible by the end of 2024. As I promised, I will go a little deeper in the let's say, renewal roadmap of our ICT systems. Our by far largest program is the new system for our environmental services. We are currently in the build phase, and that phase was very intense in the first half of the year, especially in the Q2. As you can see from these numbers below, our spend in the first half of 2023 was pretty high, EUR 5.1 million. This includes the CapEx and the actual cost that incurred in the first six months. It gives you a good picture of how much we are investing to external work and also to the internal work to renew our systems. Also, we are renewing our HR master system, and the go live should be at the end of the year in November this year. Overall, these system renewals and these sort of new operating models will obviously aim to increase our efficiency and improve our ability to use modern technology to improve the customer service, but also to make overall operations much more efficient. We are confident that we will see very positive results from these system changes in the coming years. Few sustainability highlights. As I have said earlier, we have invested a lot in strengthening our organization especially in environmental services, to bring expertise in circular economy to our company. Our customers have found us, and we have done many interesting projects with different size of customers. One example is a roadmap that was created together with Valmet Automotive car factory in Uusikaupunki, Finland. In this work, we helped our customer, in this case, Valmet Automotive, to find concrete ways how they can then reach their own sustainability targets by increasing recycling and reducing emissions. The customer is very pleased with this work that we have done together with them. Also, we had a very positive development in work safety. We have invested quite a lot into this. We are training all of our personnel within, let's say, 12 months. We started with the management last year, and this year, we are rolling out the training to rest of the personnel. As you can understand, this is a pretty sizable investment, but so far the results have been good, and our TRIF levels have reached all-time low in the first six months of the year. Our own CO2 emissions continued to decline, and this was due to the very good actions that we have had, especially in industrial services and facility services. You can see from these numbers that we are now quite a bit below last year's levels, even though the volumes in the large scale are approximately the same as they were previous year. Our emission intensity has declined quite substantially. Also one highlight from these numbers is the fact that our sick leave are finally getting down, and they were now 5.3% compared to 5.8% a year ago. Obviously, we are not yet at the levels we would like to be, which is below 5%, but certainly on our way there. This will help us in staffing, especially in facility services, Finland and Sweden. In general, I would say that also the availability of workforce is better now than it was a year ago, and that also should help us in the second half in facility services businesses, both in Finland and in Sweden. With that, I will now give floor to Valtteri, and he will go through some of the financial highlights. Go ahead, Valtteri. Thank you, Eero. Good morning, everyone. I will dive into the numbers and financing. I start with the key figures. CapEx were EUR 31.8 million, less than a year ago. In the comparison period, we had acquisitions amounted of EUR 20.5 million. Depreciations on the same level, EUR 28 million. Return on equity, return on capital employed, they both improved. Despite of the lower EBIT level, we managed to decrease capital employed by EUR 15 million. Also, our joint ventures, Laania, this renewable energy sources company, made a good result, EUR 2.2 million was our share. Also, we terminated interest rate swap and booked EUR 1.3 million gain of that. They are two items which explains the better numbers. The same reasons, earnings per share, EUR 0.24 are better than in the comparison period. Cash flow was EUR 0.55. No one-off items, it was solid and strong compared in the previous year, there were acquisitions which cause is that it was negative. Balance sheet ratios, equity ratio, and gearing, they both improved. Equity ratio is now 33.4%, and gearing is also below 90. Net working capital was -EUR 41.6 million. It improved EUR 6 million from the comparison period, and also relatively, it was -5.1%, so it was 1 percentage point better than a year ago. We have made actions to improve our payment terms. Also we have managed to improve other balance sheet items as well. Cash flow was EUR 19.3 million. It was a strong, no one-off items, and the investments cash flow was minus EUR 19 million. Our cash flow is predictable and solid. Interest-bearing debt and liquidity is IFRS 16, leasing liabilities, consolidated leasing liabilities, which mainly consist the real estate premises and heavy fleet, was EUR 76 million. They are usually between EUR 70 million and EUR 80 million. Interest-bearing debt, EUR 134 million, it decreased by EUR 30 million. We refinanced the bank loan of EUR 50 million by a EUR 40 million loan. It's a sustainability-linked loan. There are two sustainability KPIs: accident frequency and carbon footprint. After that, now all of our bank loans and bonds are sustainability-linked. In the comparison period, there were EUR 20 million commercial papers in use, and now we didn't use them. Also on top of that, the revolving credit facility, EUR 40 million, is not utilized, and same goes with the bank overdraft limits. Cash balance, EUR 30 million. Our liquidity position is pretty good. Loan portfolio. This year we will pay back the rest of the old bond in September, EUR 80 million. In total, we will pay back loans almost EUR 30 million this year, which also improves the balance sheet KPIs and also decreases the financial costs. When we refinanced this bank loan, in conjunction with that, we terminated this interest swap, EUR 30 million, booked EUR 1.3 million gain of it. Due to that, 70% of our loans have now fixed rate and 30% is variable. Weighted average effective interest rate is 3.4%, compared previous 2.4%. The next refinancing is in 2026, this EUR 40 million, and in 2028 will mature the bond of EUR 75 million, which we emitted last year. Now I hand over to Eero. Thank you, Valtteri. Finally, the outlook for 23. Our outlook is unchanged. As I said, we do have typically a quarterly fluctuation, and even though the Q2 was a little bit on the soft side, the outlook for the year is solid. Therefore, we reiterate our outlook, which is that our net sales and adjusted operating profit are estimated to be at the same level as in the previous year, even though the comparison period includes net sales from the renewable energy sources. That was our presentation, and now we are ready for your questions. If you wish to ask a question, please dial star five on your telephone keypad to enter the queue. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial star five again on your telephone keypad. The next question comes from Pasi Väisänen from Nordea. Please go ahead. Great, thanks. This is Pasi from Nordea. Well, if I start with the three questions, the first one is related to Sweden and facility services. When looking at your kind of cost overruns and the renewal of the contracts in the country and operations, would it be possible that facility service Sweden will remain loss-making next 12 months period before you actually get the kind of costs to a kind of contract prices end of 2024? The second question is related to these investments you have made to the IT system. If I remember right, the first phase of IT system investment required some over EUR 10 million, now the second phase looks to kind of require over EUR 20 million investment. Together maybe over EUR 30 million. Do you have any payback calculation for these investments, or do you need to make this investment just to keep your profitability and operating profit at the current level? Or would it be so that it actually improves your efficiency or EBIT in the future? Lastly, yes, regarding industrial services, so how much from the activity in the Q3 from the industrial service segment is actually related to the seasonal maintenances, which actually could now be under risk regarding the weak end demand for the processing industry? These three. Thanks. Yes. Okay, let's start from the last. The industrial services, as I said, right now, the outlook for the Q3 is actually quite good. There has been slight changes to the timing and scope, but nothing major. Obviously, there is always a risk that something may come, especially towards the end of the Q3. Overall, this situation where you run down the operations and up the operations again, is actually not so bad for our type of supporting services. There is demand for our services in those type of situations. Overall, I would say that as of now, the outlook in industrial services is good. As you said, there is always a risk that something may come, and we have experienced these kind of situations during the COVID time and we were able to adapt. Obviously, it requires very careful and good planning to optimize the use of resources. Then the second question was regarding these IT systems. Lassila & Tikanoja, even though is one corporation, has different businesses. This first investment that you mentioned was for facility services Finland and the accounting system, which was done., I would say five, six years ago, maybe. These system renewals that we're doing now are around environmental services, industrial services, and our HR master. Obviously, in all companies, the systems have to be up to date. If I start with environmental services, our current system is about 20 years old, and it has to be replaced. As I showed, actually, I could take back the picture. The planning of this system renewal was started already in 2020, and it is not one system, but it is actually several different systems, where there is sort of one main ERP in the center, but also the systems around it will be renewed, and the sort of new solution will be cloud-based and a very modern system. Obviously, as we are making this kind of sizable investment, there are also efficiencies that we aim to get through this system renewal. Yes, we will see efficiency gains in the coming years, but in the case of environmental services, those gains will be visible only 2025 onwards. Obviously, as environmental systems, environmental services is a very big and an important part of the company, we want to be very careful with this implementation and make sure that there are no hiccups while implementing, and that it really fulfills the needs and requirements of our business. Yes, there are investment calculations, and partly it is a replacement, and then partly it is to get efficiencies in the future. The first question was around Swedish business. We give outlook for this year only, and as I said, I believe, and we estimate that the second half will be clearly better than the first half. We do not give segment-based numbers out. We give outlook for the group, but as I said, we expect the second half to be better than the first half in Sweden. Yeah, great. That was very helpful. If I read between the lines, it's possible that Sweden will be loss-making in the second half. I guess that's a reasonable assumption. Would it be so? As I said, we don't give out outlooks by business. As I said, let's do it this way. I'll go back to the quarterly performance and as you can see, as in Finland, also in Sweden, typically, the third and Q4 are much stronger than the first and Q2. Obviously, in this year, as we have been doing quite a few things to turn around the business, the costs are visible in the first half, but we do expect the second half to be better than the first half. That will be also helped by the normal seasonality in the Swedish business. As I said, we can't give any numbers regarding the business segment, or per individual business segment. Yes, okay, I see. That was all from my side. Thanks. The next question comes from Nikko Ruokangas from SEB. Please go ahead. Hello, this is Nikko Ruokangas from SEB. I have also a couple of questions. First of all, you mentioned potential positive impacts from the current Finnish government initiatives. Could you discuss the size of the potential impact to you? Yes, we are happy to do that, but not now. We have planned, and we will have a Capital Markets Day at the end of the year in November, and by that time, we know little more, and we have had time to analyze little more what the impact might be. Especially the first bullet point, where the role of the municipal waste companies is, let's say, clarified, will be potentially quite significant for us in the future. All right. I understand. Thanks. Also regarding the industrial services, you had already before described that your industrial services is related to the overall economic situation, as you already discussed earlier in this call and answering the earlier questions. But how much overall economic turbulence have you calculated in your estimate? Has something of this economic turbulence surprised you compared to your expectations in the beginning of the year? Well, I would say that in general, our estimates were largely in line what we have actually seen. Were what was, let's say, or the impact came a little sooner to environmental services than we expected, or earlier in the Q2, we were expecting the slowdown to be more visible during the summer. At the same time, we did do some additional price increases in environmental services already in May, and those impact of those price increases was visible in June already and will be fully visible from Q3 onwards. We are reacting to these changes that we see in the market. Also, we will very carefully go through the cost structure in the environmental services to make sure that it is in line, what the customer demand outlook is for the second half of the year. Understand. Understand. Maybe follow up to this reflecting your also some of your answers. You're now behind last year, both on sales and also EBIT. Okay, I understand that the edge of the business or changing accounting methods, but you guide them both sales and EBIT to be on last year's levels despite being now behind. What do you see are the biggest risks to the guidance, and what are the biggest reasons making you confident on rating? Well, as as we are repeating our outlook, we the outlook that we have now, business by business is supporting the fact that we think the second half will be at least in line with last year's second half. The risks I have pretty much gone through already, so we are experiencing already the slowdown on the construction industry. We have been able to offset that partly with focusing more on let's say, refurbishing business. Then when it comes to the industrial services, the risk is around whether there are changes in the scope or timing of these planned maintenance breaks. As I said, right now, it looks pretty good, and the dialogue with the customers is very, very good. We believe that we can handle the potential changes there may be. All right. Understand. Thanks. That's all from me. There are no more questions at this time, so I hand the conference back to the speakers. We still have a few questions online. Rauli Juva from Inderes is asking: "Can you share some comments on the outlook of your associate company, Laania? I know Q1 is seasonally the strongest, but should we expect year-on-year improvement in H2, and how sustainable do you see the current earnings level? Well, as I already said, we don't give outlooks business by business. In general, the market situation in Laania's business is good, and we have done very good work in the joint venture. The integration has gone very good, and we have been able to do the changes and the development we have planned. The demand for this kind of green energy is very high, especially now that there is no import from Russia. I would say the outlook is solid for Laania. Thank you. Can you give any comments regarding the court case in Sweden, perhaps in particular, on what is the counterclaim of your customer based on? That's what we are wondering as well. We don't think there is any grounds in their counterclaim. Obviously, as the counterclaim is sizable, we are obliged to report it. As I said, we don't think there is any merit at all in their claims. Thank you. We have Henri Parkkinen from OP asking: "How much did your comparable employee benefit expenses increase in Q2 or in H1 2023? I can't answer that question because I don't know the answer. But the salary increase is in certain positions where percentage-wise, close to 6% according to these new collective agreements for this year. Overall, the impact on the salary increases is big because we have a lot of employees in the company, especially in Facility Services Finland. As I said, we are going to do price increases, and we are going to focus on improving our efficiency to offset the impact of salary increases, and I'm confident that we can do that by the end of the year. There are no more questions online. Thank you, Eero. Thank you very much. Very good questions. On our behalf, we wish you a very nice continuation of the summer. Thank you. Bye-bye.