Very good afternoon, and welcome to WithSecure. My name is Laura Viita, I am the Investor Relations. I'm wishing you welcome to this Q2 2023 results release. Today, we have Juhani Hintikka, our CEO, talking about the business, and Tom Jansson, our CFO, talking about the number as well as the outlook update that we gave this week. We will have questions and answers at the end. If you're watching us on the webcast, you can put in questions all the time, and we will take them up at the end as well. Thanks for joining us today. I'm handing the floor to Juhani Hintikka, President and CEO of WithSecure. Thank you, Laura. Good afternoon, everybody. The headline for today is that market uncertainty reflected in the new outlook, new products launched to strengthen core security approach. Let me walk you through some of the content and key takeaways here in Q2. First of all, our cloud portfolio, which has been one of the areas that we specifically report on, our cloud portfolio, as the name says, consists of our cloud-related part of the business. We have been, of course, reporting and tracking metrics related to that as they reflect very much the strategic focus of the company. Our cloud ARR increased by 21% to the level of EUR 81.9 million, and our cloud NRR was 107%. As you may recall, of course, NRR, both ARR, NRR are key metrics for us. NRR basically talks about how much we are able to expand our business with our existing customers. Our cloud revenue specifically grew by 20% on a year-over-year basis to the level of EUR 20.3 million, and we did have some headwinds in certain geographical areas. U.K., U.S., and Japan, more specifically, didn't meet our plans for this year, whereas in DACH and France, they performed well. As expected, our on-premise products revenue declined by 6% to the level of EUR 8.4 million. As you may recall from earlier sessions, we are very much in the process of migrating our customers from the on-premise offering to our cloud-based offering, and we expect this decline to continue. Our consulting revenue declined by 10% to the level of EUR 8.9 million. We continued to face adverse conditions in the banking sector, where clearly, our large banking sector clients have been spending less on cybersecurity than expected, and especially in U.K., where this has been a prominent part of our business. This was very visible for us. As a consequence of many of these things, we issued a profit warning on the 11 July 2023 regarding our revenue and profitability outlook. In terms of the profitability, our adjusted EBITDA was at the level of minus EUR 7.9 million. As you may recall, we reported on cost-saving actions that we took earlier on in the year. Now regarding Q2, some of those savings were partly offset by two specific one-off items, one of them being our one-off salary payments in Q2, and then marketing expenses related to SPHERE23. SPHERE is our key annual marketing event, which we organize once a year. We had it here in Helsinki in May. It was a very successful event, over 500 participants, 50 media representatives, and so forth, it comes, of course, with a cost. We expect to see a bigger impact of the restructuring activities in Q3. In order to broaden our approach and to ensure competitiveness down the road, we did launch new products and services at SPHERE. We complemented our current software platform, the Elements platform, with the Cloud Security Posture Management product, which further supports our customers' migration to the cloud environment. We did launch also so-called Co-Security Services, which complement our offering to further strengthen and support our partners' approach in the market. I'm happy to report that both of these products that we launched have actually been very well taken, very well received, and we have tens of pilot customers for those at the moment. With that, I'm gonna next hand over to our CFO, Tom. Tom is gonna talk more about the outlook for 2023, and I will be back for questions in the end. Thank you, Juhani. If we first look at the unfortunate, that profit warning that we had to issue some days ago. Maybe just a background that also, you know, we are, with the exception of consulting, of course, in a subscription business and as our, our business has been lately quite, or very back-end loaded. Once we closed June and started to see the outcome, unfortunately then, that, then led to this determination that our ambitious goals that we had set for the year probably will not be met, and then we had to, of course, then adjust our outlook for this year. Maybe a few background notes still on this. Of course, you know, we had ambitious goals, so one element is that we see a room for improvement in our own execution against those goals. We are clearly seeing that, during this year, the market, the dynamics have changed a little bit. A lot of the large market participants are investing more and more also in the segments that we are in. Of course, this means that competition has toughened up also for us, and that has had some impact on certain of our product areas. As Juhani also mentioned, that our consulting demand specifically in the segments that we are in, has been continued to be somewhat weak. As the June numbers came in at the end, then this kind of conclusions had to be drawn once we knew the results. If you look at the actual numbers, you know, our cloud ARR was still growing year-on-year 21%. It was a modestly growth at the end than what we expected, and revenue, very similar growth also. As mentioned, there are markets where our expectations for this year have been higher than what we've actually been executing. U.K., U.S., and Japan has been kind of the three markets that mainly has kind of fallen below what we were expecting. Of course, we also, on the contrary, have regions like DACH and France, that has been doing as we have planned. The on-premise, as discussed, the revenue is declining. This is no news, and this is according to what we have been expecting as well in the transition to our cloud services. This consulting, of course, has been a bumpy road for us. We have a great team together, rebuilt last year. Of course, the unfortunate thing is that when the business is on this level, we have unused capacity available that we, of course, are working on to get back into to work, revenue-generating work also in H2. I said, mainly the financial sector, where we have a lot of big customers, is the place where we have seen less demand than what we have expected. Then also our new logo acquisition has not been fast enough to replace that business. A combination of those, unfortunately, then have led that. At the moment, the H2 has been lower than what we expected, and this, of course, takes a toll also on the overall company profit or growth numbers as well. Here's just the deferred revenue and development, maybe not more. I think this is quite familiar for those who are looking at our numbers, so maybe no more comments on that. This is going according to the transition that we have expected. Of course, the growth rate has also somewhat an impact on these numbers. Our profitability, our total revenue then ended up at EUR 34.8, was not as expected, as we have said. Gross margin still stayed quite okay, on a 69% level, even though our consulting is reducing our gross margin because of unused capacity. Our EBITDA, as discussed, was minus EUR 7.9. Of course, somewhat lower, maybe than what we expected. There were some one-off items. Of course, the top line also lower than we were expecting. That's the combination of that. Our medium-term financial target stays the same. This is we are going through a strategy process in this quarter. We will end that at the end of this quarter. If needed, we will have another look on what those would be and potentially update them if there is a need for that. For the time being, we are still working very hard to achieve a break-even point for Q4. We'll see at the end of the year then, what the outcome is, but these have not been changing. This was a very short summary of our numbers, and I would ask Juhani back here with me, and we could take questions. All right, thanks. We'll start in the room. Hello, it's Atte Riikola from Inderes. Maybe first, about the competitive landscape, did you mention it has been getting tighter? Could you open up a little bit more about the situation, do you see, like, increased competition in every product area or only in some markets, or how's the situation? First of all, of course, everybody's impacted by the economic circumstances, the macroeconomy. Therefore, if the pie is getting a little bit smaller, then of course, the competition intensifies, and that kind of goes in principle across the board. More specifically, we have had certain product areas where clearly, I think, some of the customers have preferred vendors, where they can find a synergy with existing, completely other product areas that they have with these vendors. That, of course, have made it commercially more attractive than to choose other vendors. I think that's clearly visible in certain areas. MDR has been one example out of that. Our Managed Detection and Response offering, which is a services offering on top of our own software, basically, you could characterize by being the Rolls-Royce of the MDR. If you find the right customer who's willing to pay for that proposition, then usually we're very competitive, but there are also other drivers that, in certain cases, mean that customers make other choices. The competition is tough for everybody. It is also partly geographic. We've seen, for example, that the U.K. market has been especially tough during this first half, and of course, for us, it has meant very much about kind of consulting and financial sector as such, but it's other things as well, and we've heard similar commentary from other players in the industry. All right. If you think about from the churn perspective, have you seen, like, increased churn in Q2, or is, like, the tighter competition affecting your new sales outlook more? Yes and no. I think there has been some churn because of the reasons I just mentioned, so, there have been some churn customers. At the same time, of course, we have also not been standing still. We have very much been focusing on also winning now MDR business in the mid-market space. Previously, many of these large MDR customers have been more in the enterprise space than mid-market, than we have actually been quite successful now in second half in the mid-market by winning new MDR customers. Then it becomes more of a volume game that you need, of course, more of those because on average, they're smaller. You mentioned that you have found some areas for the operational improvement, what are those areas in particular? I think a couple of things. One of them that we have removed one management layer in sales, now we have a leadership team member, the Chief Customer Officer, where all the country sales organizations report directly to that person. That was not the case before, and we expect that to help. Of course, there has been also, as announced, the head of customer operations, Juha Kivikoski, is leaving the company, the process for appointing a successor is well advanced. About the new product launches, what kind of growth expectations you have for those? We expect them to increase our competitiveness in the Elements product business and to support our channel business, because they have been specifically designed to solve problems in the mid-market that our partners are facing. Having complementing services on top of your product is a differentiating factor against pure product vendors. In some cases, of course, our conclusion has also been that for the end customer, it's sometimes been really difficult in a way to get full benefit out of the products and solutions they have been purchasing. Adding supporting services for them, actually, we think is going to be very important and differentiating. Maybe I can complement that or add to that we are still in the pilot phase on many of these products, but the interest we are really enthusiastic about the interest. If you think about kind of growth, that's mainly more next year than this year. Yeah. About the profitability, still if you look at your guidance, there is still, like, option for the positive EBITDA in Q4, so what needs to happen if that materializes? I think as I mentioned earlier, there we have still a lot of unused capacity in consulting, so we need to get those to work. And, you know, with our current capacity, we can do millions of EUR in revenue more there. And then we need some growth and of course, we are looking at some tweaks in the our spending as well, but, that's, I think, the main things that we are looking to do in second half. Last question about the consulting terms. What kind of outlook do you have for the second half of the year for that business? There's still, like, gonna be some troubles in the U.K., or does the situation seems better now? I think we continue to be in a situation where we have not full indications of the demand coming back to where it was with the current customers, but we are very active in now going after completely new customers. There might be a time lapse before that then starts showing in the revenue. Overall, of course, the tendency is that in the second half, there tends to be more business than in the first half. Many customers are using their budgets in Q4, that it's typically a high quarter in our business, and that includes as well consulting. All right. Thank you. Thanks. We have most of our analysts online, lots of questions online as well. First of all, Valtteri, our analyst, asks: In the sector, we have companies that are doing well and ones that are doing poorly. The market has softened, but clearly some are managing better than others. How is the market and demand overall for you? What is the environment? Can you give some color? Yeah. As I said earlier on, I think this continues to be a growth business, and we are growing as a company. Of course, our aspirations were for higher growth, and that's why we had to kind of downgrade them. The economic uncertainty is there for everybody, of course, then there are variations depending on the portfolio item and depending on the geographic region as such. We have very competitive products in Elements. We also have certain areas which are quite unique in our company. So for example, Cloud Content Protection for Salesforce, that is something where we don't face too much competition. We have very capable offensive security consultants, which is quite a differentiating capability. Those are the, in a way, top hackers, you could characterize them, and many of our customers are, of course, approaching us because of that. We continue to believe that we have good chances in competing in this market. We're continuously evolving our portfolio. As explained in, at SPHERE, we launched completely new products to support the strategy. At the same time, this is a transformation process of building the company. We're one year into it, and of course, it takes time also to kind of do all of this. We're happy with the direction we are taking, and we have done some operational improvements also very recently to further help us on that journey. All right. Do you see growth in cloud turning back to the 30%-40% levels seen last year and in previous guidance, and if so, when? Well, of course, the big item in our kind of a cloud portfolio has been MDR, so it has been a big part of that, overall, growth. Now, of course, our intention is to offset some of the larger, MDR cases, not growing as fast, while having a lot more mid-sized MDR cases, and we expect that to help in this process. For the rest, we don't see a dramatic change in their growth. We have questions from Felix Henriksson, our analyst. In which areas are you seeing tightening competition, and how can you differentiate against bigger vendors expanding to the mid-market segment of endpoint protection? As previously mentioned, I think the tighter competition has been more on the local enterprise MDR cases. That's where we've seen the biggest impact in competition. In terms of the mid-market, we believe that we are competitive, and also, I think with the addition of the new Co-Security Services, we will be also more differentiated as a partner towards the market. Given the weakening market fundamentals you're facing, how should we read into your long-term targets, which imply that you will double your revenue by 2025 and achieve 20% EBITDA margin? Like I said, we have a strategy process, as we have every year ongoing. After that, we will evaluate our targets. Then see if there's a need to change them. Can you describe the monthly demand trends you witnessed during Q2 in consulting? What was the low point of the quarter, and are you seeing any signs of a pickup in demand? I think, you know, very typical these days are that the third month of the quarter is the strongest. I think Q2 wasn't any different to that. We have seen some improved, slight improvement in demand for the future, we'll see how things play out. Are you seeing price pressure in consulting, given that demand has slowed down and some of your peers might have excess capacity? Yeah, I can comment on that one. I think we have actually, as I said earlier on, we have quite a differentiated consulting proposition. We have capabilities that are hard to find, and that's why many of the large companies, and especially the financial sector, are buying from us. Now, I think that has come together with a fairly attractive day rates, and we haven't seen those dramatically changing. I think it's more of a question just of the overall spend that they have had towards us. Should we expect you to spend as much as EUR 1.1 million on SPHERE in the coming years? SPHERE is a key event for us. I would say that, I mean, it helps us position the new brand. We're only one year into WithSecure as a brand. We need to continue that work. At the same time, I think, SPHERE has a distinct target of showing us as somebody who stands out, has interesting content, doesn't only talk about the products and solutions, but also about what is going on generally in cybersecurity and geopolitics, and I think, the feedback has been very encouraging. We intend to continue that, and probably we are looking at doubling the amount of participants next year. All right. We have questions from David Vondracek, our analyst. I hope we answered the first one already. The question continues: What kind of measures are you taking to gain an edge on competition, be it pricing, new product development, or something else? I think overall, our approach towards the market is outcome security, as we call it, and that means that we're trying to engage in a dialogue with our customers, where we really understand that where we can make an impact on our customers' business, not just talk about cybersecurity as a technical concept. I think that has been well-received. It's a differentiated proposition, and that also includes that having both products and services in our portfolio, we can craft solutions that flexibly then try to address those issues that are emanating from this outcome security approach, and that we will continue. We partly answered, but maybe let's take this once again. You also mentioned that identification of areas of organizational improvements. Could you give more details on that front? Yeah, like I already said earlier on, I think one example of this was the removal of one management layer in sales to give more direct access for the head of customer operations or head of sales into the countries where the actual business is being done. Good. Questions from Matti Ahokas, our analyst. I think, we answered the first one about the consulting demand during Q2. Second part of the question, how much did the new consulting customers contribute to sales? We don't have specifics, but of course, we would have needed more of that in order to offset the existing customers' lower spend, so but we did, you know, and we do get new customer logos also in consulting, but just not with the speed that we would have needed. Just to complement, and this goes across the board, the portfolio, we have added new customers in every category in Q2. You said competition from large players has increased, and your own performance was weaker in the U.K., U.S., and Japan. Is it these markets where you see large players entering the small and mid-cap cloud software market? If that's the case, aren't DACH and France the next obvious focus areas for competition? What tends to happen, of course, is that if the spending overall in the enterprise space slows down, then everybody looks at the next segment, and that's mid-market. I think it's fair to say that probably everybody's considering it, and we've also heard from some of the competitors in the marketplace saying that they're going to orient towards that. Of course, it's a question of how to do it, and we, of course, have a very strong position in terms of our channel partners and our long history of doing business with them, and also our ability to be very close to them, to support them with our partner programs for gold, silver, and platinum partners. I think we will be competitive there. Now in, with the recent additions to the portfolio, we can also be differentiated, because some of these players that you allude to are pure product players. Okay, a question about Countercept MDR. Did the Countercept MDR net sales decline in Q2? Well, we don't give that detail, so we can't answer that. All right, we move to Jaakko Tyrväinen, our analyst. You mentioned large rivals who have taken more active role in the SME sector. I understand that you don't want to speak with names, could you give a bit more color on the rivals which have taken steps towards SME clients, in which geographical areas you have evidenced their activity? We don't actually have, and I may have given a wrong impression if I said that we've been facing a lot of that in the mid-market segment. We haven't yet. I think many of them have stated intentions of being there. I think the biggest challenges we have had has been in the kind of a local enterprise space, where we have had large MDR customers, and that's where we've faced most of the competition, in specifically in the MDR space. If you look at the overall endpoint market, endpoint EPP market, EDR markets, it's quite a crowded market, of course, and there are a couple of very large players there, and then a long list of smaller players there. Of course, if the growth slows down in the marketplace, we might see further consolidation in the market by other players, and of course, everybody's kind of eyeing that mid-market segment. As said, we haven't encountered in our business there, and we have a very good traction situation, for example, in DACH and France. All right. A question from the webcast audience: In operational expenses, it was mentioned one-off salaries. Can this be explained in detail? Sure. Our solution for this year for the salary increases were that a portion of the salary increases was paid as a one-off, which was also a model that some of the Finnish union agreements were. We applied that globally. That's why you see a bigger one-off payment in Q2 than that. That was part of a general salary increase. Mm-hmm. All right, we have questions from Jaakko Tyrväinen, our analyst. Maybe we answered, but let's repeat once more: Has the intensified competition also been visible in churn, or is it mainly just making the new sales more challenging? There have been a couple of churn cases that, well, we have lost because of the competition. All right. The sales in Nordic countries were down 6% year-on-year. Could you give more color on this? What was the FX impact, and how much is explained by consulting? I think the FX impact, of course, there was some, but not the main driver. I think we have already talked about the reasons for that. Those are the same for Nordics as well. The new product launches, what are your own expectations? Will this have relevant impact on ARR towards the year end? I think, as mentioned previously, we expect the biggest impact to happen in 2024. We are, of course, now ramping up, and we're very happy with the traction we're getting and piloting and taking those forward. We have tens of pilots going on. Good. We're moving to Eric's questions. The consulting business seems quite tricky. Last year, you had an issue of the demand for staff being too hot, now quickly turned on to too weak demand. Can you discuss how you look at the quality of your consulting business, and what can be done to potentially improve it? Yes, it's fair to say that it's been quite a rollercoaster. First we were lacking capacity, then we had too much capacity when the demand went down, and I have to say that I've looked personally in detail into our forecasting and the communication with the customers, and I have to say that some of it was very difficult to foresee that that would happen. I don't think there's much that we can do there. Of course, staying close to customers, as close to customers as possible to understand that if there's that kind of a thing to be expected. Overall, our value proposition in consulting is very strong. I was visiting one major customer in U.K. a few weeks ago, one of the CSOs. He mentioned that I asked him that, "Why do you buy consulting from us?" He said that, "Look, I mean, I could buy consulting from any of the big four companies that we usually use. We have frame contracts with them. I buy consulting from you because I expect I will get leading-edge technology understanding and research-based offensive security consultants." This is a capability that very few companies can actually kind of provide, and that continues to be our value proposition. Great. Can you give us your thoughts on where you are in your upselling journey? You now have five modules in Elements. How many products does the average client take, and what is a realistic target in two years? Yeah, we haven't given out the statistics around that, but this is, of course, has been a key topic for us, and we are tracking that, how many of this target audience between 200 to 5,000 seats especially are using more than two solutions. We have seen an improvement there, and we're gradually tracking that. We're also training our sales organization to cover the whole portfolio, at least on a high level, and that is moving forward, and we expect that to help. Obviously, that is more of an activity to get more out of the existing base, but it's an important part of our plan. There's a question from our audience: How are you seeing in your sales cases Microsoft's strengthening role in various segments of cybersecurity business? It's clear to, clear to say that they are... Of course, they have invested a lot into this space, and they have connected cybersecurity capabilities with their E5 license, which is kind of basically all you can, all you can need, including also cybersecurity. Of course, in certain cases, commercially tough to compete, but I think that the answer is that we need to position ourselves slightly differently than what they are doing. I think, complementing technology also with service is quite an important differentiator. Some of the information you are getting out of those systems provided by them as well, of course, require a lot of expertise in order to be able to do something with those detections. After detection comes also response, and in many cases, of course, the customers may not have that capability. We can provide that capability in form of, for example, threat hunters. A question from Felix for Tom. We just discussed this today. Are you planning to arrange a capital markets day following your ongoing strategy process? That's a good question. We probably will make that decision in August, and depending a little bit on timing and strategy process, but especially if we see a big demand, we will, of course, serve the market as best as we can. A question from our webcast audience: Why doesn't WithSecure tap into hardware-based security solutions like firewalls and so on? There are many opportunities in this vertical. Well, I would say that regarding firewalls and network security, that is an area we don't cover at all, and there are already very large existing players. It's a very difficult market to enter, and besides, we are a software company rather than a hardware company, and the dynamics are completely different in that space. A question from Simon Granath, our analyst: How come your guidance interval for cloud ARR and sales are the same? Are you expecting a rapid rebound in the momentum in second half? Yeah, I mean, they tend to go pretty hand in hand, and we, the forecast we see is that they're gonna be close to each other. Good. The gross margin has developed very favorably last couple of quarters. Do you think the trends that supported that growth will continue? If I start, of course, we, as we have said before, we are working very, very hard with our hosting costs and the data usage in the network and so on. Those have paid off some in results. We also are working on of course, the kind of threat hunting piece in our Countercept solution, and as that scales up, that will improve as well, and so on. I think where we are now is a result of a lot of work that we put in over the last 12 months. Thank you. That was the end of the questions online, unless somebody puts in a rapid new question. Anything from the room? If not, I think we're ready to wrap up. All right. Thank you. Thank you very much. Thank you.