Please stand by. Your program is about to begin. If you need audio assistance during today's program, please press star zero. Hello, and welcome to Ipsen's conference call and webcast on the acquisition of Epizyme. The call is being hosted by David Loew, Chief Executive Officer of Ipsen. After a short presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. You may register to ask a question at any time by pressing star one on your touch-tone phone. It is now my pleasure to turn today's call over to David Loew. Please go ahead. Good afternoon and good morning, everyone. As you've just heard, I'm David Loew, Chief Executive Officer of Ipsen. I'm delighted that you have joined today as we take you through today's exciting news on the acquisition of Epizyme. Please turn to slide two. This is our usual safe harbor statement, which outlines the routine risks and uncertainties contained within this presentation. Please turn to slide three. I'm joined today by Howard Mayer, Ipsen's Head of Research and Development, as well as our CFO, Aymeric Le Chatelier. We'll provide a brief presentation before using the majority of the time to answer your questions. Please turn to slide four. I will begin the presentation by taking you through the strategic rationale for the acquisition of Epizyme. I'll then hand over to Howard, who will explain the science behind tazemetostat. I will go through the commercial opportunities before Aymeric runs through the financials, and then we'll turn to your questions. Please turn to slide five. First, let me turn to the strategic rationale for today's news. Please turn to slide six. Ipsen has entered into an exclusive agreement to acquire Epizyme, a fully integrated commercial-stage biopharmaceutical company developing and delivering transformative therapies for cancer patients against novel epigenetic targets. Through this agreement, we will expand our assets in oncology. Ipsen's capabilities and resources in oncology, combined with Epizyme, will accelerate the growth of Tazverik to achieve its full potential in follicular lymphoma patients. Tazverik is a first-in-class chemotherapy-free EZH2 inhibitor approved by the FDA for adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma, whose tumors are positive for an EZH2 mutation as detected by an FDA-approved test, and who have received at least two prior systemic therapies. Also, importantly, adult patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma who have no satisfactory alternative treatment options. Furthermore, it is also indicated for adult and pediatric patients aged 60 years and older with metastatic or locally advanced epithelioid sarcoma not eligible for complete resection. Furthermore, we're excited to bring on board epigenetic expertise and the SETD2 inhibitor, as well as several preclinical compounds into our portfolio. Please turn to slide seven. The acquisition is a strong strategic fit for Ipsen. It builds on our commitment to oncology, expanding from solid tumors to hematology. It gives us global access to Tazverik, which is already approved in the U.S., generating sales, and which has a patent life in the U.S. extending to 2032. Given our strong US market presence and capabilities, we can leverage our infrastructure to boost sales and plan to expand also into other markets. Tazverik has additional life cycle potential in earlier lines, and I will go into more detail later what this means for peak sales. Today's news is also perfectly in line with our priority of replenishing our pipeline with programs at both clinical and preclinical phases of development in oncology. The acquisition comes with Epizyme's first-in-class oral SETD2 inhibitor, EZM0414, which was granted FDA Fast Track status and is currently under evaluation in multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Furthermore, in line with our strategy to bolster our pipeline across all stages, it will also add preclinical candidates. We believe that Tazverik and the pipeline have good short-term and longer-term sales potential. Let me now hand over to Howard. Please turn to slide eight. Thanks, David, and hello, everyone. I'd like to spend a few minutes going through the science behind Tazverik, as well as the new data recently presented at ASCO. Please turn to slide nine. I want to start by talking to you about follicular lymphoma or FL, which is the main focus of the acquisition. It's the most common indolent form of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and it's composed of malignant cells derived from germinal center B-cells. Common symptoms of FL include enlargement of the lymph nodes or lymphadenopathy in the neck, underarms, abdomen or groin, as well as fatigue, shortness of breath, night sweats and weight loss, the so-called B symptoms. Often, patients with FL have no obvious symptoms of the disease at diagnosis, presenting, for example, with asymptomatic lymphadenopathy. FL comprises a significant proportion of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases, accounting for about 35% of all non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. There are approximately 15,000 patients diagnosed with FL in the U.S. every year. The median age at diagnosis is about 65, and the majority of patients have advanced disease at diagnosis. FL is characterized by remission followed by relapse in most patients, and therefore, there continues to be an unmet medical need for these patients. Please turn to slide 10. Turning to Tazverik, it is a selective oral inhibitor of both mutant and wild-type EZH2. EZH2 is a histone methyltransferase which inhibits genes responsible for tumor suppression. Tazverik inhibits and reduces EZH2 activity, preventing the accumulation and proliferation of malignant germinal center B cells. Importantly, given the central role of EZH2 in germinal center formation, in addition to patients with mutant EZH2, wild-type patients are also inherently reliant on this protein. Please turn to slide 11. Tazverik as monotherapy was demonstrated to be an efficacious and tolerable treatment option for FL patients in the relapsed refractory setting with at least two prior lines of therapy. I'd like to take a moment to highlight the relevant clinical data in the phase II trial investigating Tazverik as monotherapy in third line FL that was the basis of FDA granting accelerated approval. First, the efficacy results demonstrated an overall response rate of 69% in the EZH2 mutated population, while in wild-type patients it was 34%. Importantly, there were broadly similar median durations of response and median progression-free survivals observed in both of these two subgroups. The safety profile was also encouraging. The total number of treatment-related grade three and above adverse events was below 5%, while the discontinuation rate due to treatment emergent adverse events was only 8% and only 5% were treatment related. Treatment-related serious adverse events were only 4%, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Please turn to slide 12. At ASCO earlier this month, Epizyme presented updated safety and efficacy data from the phase I-B run-in portion of SYMPHONY-I, its phase I-B/III confirmatory trial. This is evaluating Tazverik in combination with Rituximab and Lenalidomide or R-squared versus placebo plus R-squared in patients with relapsed refractory second-line follicular lymphoma. It is scheduled to read out in 2026. The data were quite impressive, with an overall response rate of 95%, with wild-type patients achieving an overall response rate of 94% and mutated patients at 100% with a complete response rate of 50%. The overall response rate was also 100% for Rituximab refractory patients and for patients with progression of disease in the first 24 months. Median duration of response and progression-free survival have not yet been reached. The safety profile was also highly encouraging, with Tazverik being generally well-tolerated and adverse events being completely consistent with those contained in the prescribing information for both Tazverik and R-squared. It's these data that add to our confidence in the ongoing phase III portion of the trial. Please turn to slide 13. There is an attractive clinical and preclinical pipeline included in the transaction. These are the three key Tazverik clinical trials. The first is SYMPHONY-I, the trial I mentioned a moment ago, which is a registrational confirmatory trial in second line FL. It's now in the phase III stage of development. The LYSA trial in high-risk front-line FL and in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in combination with R-CHOP is in phase II development, while EZH-1501 is a basket trial with Tazverik in combination with multiple targeted therapies for relapsed refractory hematologic malignancies. Outside of Tazverik, the SETD2 inhibitor, EZM0414, is in phase I clinical development in relapsed refractory multiple myeloma and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Finally, Epizyme also has several preclinical programs focused on epigenetic targets. Thank you for listening. I'll now hand you back to David. Please turn to slide 14. Thank you, Howard. I'm now going to outline the scale of the commercial opportunity for Tazverik. Please turn to slide 15. I believe we have an opportunity to be more specific in the positioning of Tazverik in follicular lymphoma on two accounts. First, we have seen the strength of the data that supports Tazverik's positioning, in fact, within the current registration in all comers, meaning in mutant and wild-type patients, as an efficacious and highly tolerable treatment option for patients. Epizyme launched the Tazverik in third line follicular lymphoma during the pandemic and focused mostly on the mutated population. As we exit the pandemic, it now has the opportunity to address mutant and wild-type patients according to the label in follicular lymphoma. It's worth noting, the recent addition of monotherapy Tazverik to NCCN guidelines endorsement for the second line treatment of follicular lymphoma in elderly or infirm patients. Second, while we have all seen the strong results of CAR T therapies and the recent approvals of bispecific antibodies, we believe that they will have a stronger role in the fit and younger patient populations. We believe that the cytokine release syndrome, which bispecifics have shown, will not make it very easy to be used in a community setting, even with the subcutaneous version. Therefore, Tazverik can have its ideal place in the more elderly, unfit population, given the strong efficacy and safety profile. As a reminder, the average age at diagnosis is 65 years. The unfit and elderly patients are mostly treated in the community setting. Here we can leverage our commercial and medical affairs in-field strength and capabilities to reach more patients. Over the short term, our focus will be on the current indications in the United States. We are looking also at the expansion to other markets and the additional indication in second-line, which is a larger patient pool. Therefore, in the short/midterm period, we estimate between $150 million-$250 million of peak sales. Should Tazverik be approved in second-line follicular, these sales could reach around $800 million. In this estimate, we recognize another recent regulatory approval in follicular lymphoma as well as other potential competition. I'll now hand over to Aymeric, who will summarize the financials. Please turn to slide 16. Thanks, David. I will now go through the financial terms and impact to Ipsen of the transaction. Please turn to slide 17. The terms of the agreement include an offer to acquire all outstanding shares of Epizyme for $1.45 per share in cash at the closing for an estimated consideration of $247 million. We continue to build significant firepower for other external innovation transactions. The agreement has been structured to reduce the risk for Ipsen with the contingent value rights, or CVR, based on the success of Tazverik. The one contingent value right per share will entitle its holder to deferred cash payment of $0.30 per CVR, payable upon the sales reaching $250 million by December of 2026, and an additional $0.70 per CVR, payable upon an NDA approval in second-line FL by the start of 2028. Subject to the satisfaction of all closing conditions, including the clearance of U.S. antitrust authority and the completion of the tender offer, we anticipate the closing of the transaction by the end of September. Please turn to slide 18. As you imagine, we will fully fund the transaction through existing cash and line of credit. The transaction will provide immediate sales, and based on the Q1 performance of Tazverik, which generates already a full year sales of more than $13 million, we will very shortly leverage our U.S. commercial infrastructure. The acquisition will also enhance our long-term performance through the potential approval of the Tazverik combination in second-line FL, as well as through the potential of the rest of Epizyme's pipeline. Regarding the impact on EPS, there will be a moderate dilutive impact on core operating income until the end of 2024. Regarding 2022, given the expected timing, the transaction will have a limited impact on the core operating margin. As you can see, this agreement supports our 2025 medium-term outlook to build a high-value and sustainable pipeline through external innovation strategy. I will now hand it back to David. Please turn to slide 19. Thank you, Aymeric. I'd now like to conclude our presentation before we go to your questions. Please turn to slide 20. We feel it is a great strategic fit, for it keeps strengthening and it adds our portfolio in oncology and our early and clinical-stage pipeline. Focusing on Tazverik, our commercial opportunities are significant across both the short and long term. We were impressed by its efficacy and safety profile and the recent phase I-B response data. Finally, I look forward to updating you on our continuing journey with external innovation as a key platform for growth. Please turn to slide 21. Thank you for listening to our presentation. We now have time for questions. Operator, over to you. Thank you. At this time, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your touch tone phone. You may remove yourself from the queue by pressing the pound key. Once again, that's star one to ask a question. We will take our first question from Michael Leuchten with UBS. Your line is open. Thank you. It's Michael Leuchten from UBS. Two questions if I could please. Just thinking about the infrastructure that you may need to put in place in the U.S. You've made it very clear, David, that one thing you were looking for is sort of access to oncology assets in the U.S. Is there an ability to leverage what you have already that you can then try to integrate the new resources and infrastructure into? Or is this basically an infrastructure play as well that you will then look to leverage further down the line with potential additional assets? The second question, just going back to your commentary around where the bispecifics may or may not fit. Could you give us an idea what you think the percentage of the patient population is that is elderly and frail, where things like CRS are just not acceptable, hence and hence giving you a commercial opportunity with Tazverik in follicular lymphoma? Second line. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, Michael. Regarding your first question about the infrastructure in the U.S., yes, we will be able to leverage our current infrastructure. You know, certainly we will add also Epizyme's infrastructure because they are already present now. We are gonna combine, you know, to a certain degree our two field forces because in fact, Epizyme, given its size, did not have enough resources yet and also was launching under COVID. It was hard for them to access to the office-based hematologists. They also focused more in the launch on the mutant patients. As I said, we believe that this is an all-comer drug, yet more positioned for elderly and frail patients. That leads me to your second question, which is, you know, we estimate that the elderly and frail are roughly 50% of the population. Of course you need to then look at, you know, some of them are gonna be treated in academic hospitals, some other ones are gonna be treated in the office space setting, where we think the bispecifics are gonna have a bit less pickup because of the cytokine release syndrome. Even if you look at the subcutaneous version, which has recently been published, there clearly still is grade two cytokine release syndrome with example on the Mosunetuzumab. That's a problem for the elderly and frail patients. Thank you. We'll take our next question from Simon Baker with Redburn. Your line is open. Thank you for taking my questions. Two, if I may please. Firstly, a financial question. You talk about moderate dilutive impact on core operating income till the end of 2024. I wonder if you could give us a little more quantification of what moderate means there. Secondly, both EZH2 and SETD2 are expressed in solid tumors. I just wondered if you could give us the scope beyond the hematologic setting for both these drugs. I noticed that Tazverik is already in the CELLO-I study for prostate cancer. If you could just give us an idea of the scope in solid tumors for both these assets, that'd be very helpful. Thanks so much. Thank you, Simon. We'll have Aymeric answer your first question and then, Howard answer the second question. Yeah. Regarding the dilution, as you've noted, we expect dilution, especially in 2022, so this year, and 2023, given the level of R&D spend, but also that there will be a progressive ramp-up on sales. There will be also a progressive impact of the expected synergy. I think that we expect less dilution going into 2024 and then the deal to be accretive starting from 2025. I think regarding the. I won't give you the exact number, but to provide you maybe some elements of the quantification. As David said, we are expecting to be able to leverage our current US infrastructure. We know also that Epizyme has started to prioritize its R&D program, and we'll also have a look at it in order to progressively optimize the R&D spend in order to be able to deliver the accretion from 2025. Howard? Yeah. Maybe I'll take the second question. I mean, I think that, you know, it's fair to say that our focus for Tazemetostat is on hematologic malignancies. You know, however, you know, CELLO-I is an important study. It's looking at Tazemetostat in combination with novel hormonal therapies in chemo-naive patients with mCRPC, and I think we're very interested in that. We're looking carefully at that study. I should also note that there are preclinical programs where there is a focus on solid tumors rather than hematologic malignancies. I think, you know, the epigenetic platform in general can be both for hematologic malignancies and also for solid tumors. Great. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from Matt Weston with Credit Suisse. Your line is open. Thank you very much. I hope you can hear me. David, you laid out the peak sales potential, and you mentioned that you would consider opportunities in other geographies. There is just as many elderly and frail patients with follicular lymphoma in Europe, where you have also a very strong oncology business. Could you tell us how much of your potential peak sales in the two settings of second line and third line you would consider coming from the European market, or is that incremental upside on those numbers? Secondly, you mentioned the challenges of the CD3/CD20s with CRS, but I also note that Epizyme recently added a Mosunetuzumab plus Tazemetostat arm to one of their multi-cohort studies in hematologic malignancies in phase II. I wondered what potential you saw of that combination moving forward and how much that played a part in your decision on the company? Thanks a lot. That's a great question. On the peak sales of other geographies, that's incremental. Reason is that Epizyme did not really have contact with EMA on the accelerated approval program very recently. We are looking at payer research because with the ASCO data that has recently been published, we need to see if actually that would be reimbursed or not. For the moment, we want to be a bit careful because we know that the payer environment in ex-US is pretty tough, and they might wanna wait for the second-line full approval. For the moment, we have not really sales in there in a significant fashion. On your question on CD3/CD20, the combination of Mosunetuzumab and Tazverik, it has not been, you know, the primary driver of this. We really modeled the sales in the elderly and frail. We will have to see what the combination of these two is. I mean, that might open up new opportunities because the tolerability of Tazverik is excellent. If you would use the bispecific in a setting where you have the infrastructure to actually handle the CRS syndromes, then it could absolutely be combined with Tazverik, and then the positioning would actually be enlarged perhaps also into the more fit population and the younger population. It's very early days. The protocol amendment is being made as we talk. It could be potentially a very interesting combination. Can I just jump in with one other one following on from Simon's question about dilution? I totally understand that you don't wanna put numbers on it, and I totally understand that you see synergies, but what I'm struggling to square the circle on is Aymeric's comment that the dilution in 2022 isn't very dramatic because it's only towards the end of the year. also that you intend to keep the commercial infrastructure, and it will take some time to review R&D. Mathematically, if you take consensus expectations, then a full year, if you just bang the two companies together, would be about a 20% dilution. Half a year of that this year, you know. that's whatever, 5% for a quarter in 2022. Then obviously there's the synergy elements. The market seems to have decided that the right number is a 10% dilution moving forward because we just assume you'll cut half the costs out. Is that a reasonable assumption, Aymeric, or do you think it will take some time to get to that level of high single digits, low double digits dilution? Matt, I think you're very good at doing some of the math. I'm not gonna, as I said, give you a precise number, but I think you get the story. Clearly, 2022, because of the timing of the transaction within the quarter, the impact will be limited to our financials. I think that we will be able to generate synergy pretty quickly, but there will be a ramp up to fully execute on that. That's why the peak of the dilution is gonna be in 2023. But clearly, not on the consensus number for Epizyme today, 'cause clearly our objective is to integrate as quickly as possible. We're gonna start from today to work on that together with the Epizyme team. That's why, together with also all the prioritization on the R&D pipeline, which has already been announced by Epizyme, and we look at it in more detail and also generate synergy. Clearly, the third element, as you know, will be our expected turnaround on the sales. That will be, apart from the cost synergy, a very important driver of the transaction, which will take a little bit time to fully realize. Thank you very much. Our next question comes from Richard Vosser with JP Morgan. Your line is now open. Thanks very much. Just a few questions, please. First question is the proportion. I know you've mentioned that you want to expand into sort of wild type tumors as well. But if you could give us the proportion of tumors that are sequenced for EZH2 today in follicular lymphoma and how that's been going would be great. Second question is we've seen other compounds in blood cancer have their accelerated approvals removed, particularly the PI3Ks. Just how is there any risk here in terms of the accelerated approval? That and how you've looked at that. Finally, just a couple of questions thinking about future M&A. I think you mentioned earlier sort of maybe building on the infrastructure, or at least you were asked about that. Maybe we could get your updated thoughts post this deal on whether you're focused on similar size deals or continuing to or any larger, and what the focus areas might be for those. Yeah, I'll stop there. Thanks very much. Okay. Thanks, Richard. On the number of patients. If I got this right, number of patients being tested currently for the EZH2 mutation, that's your question? Yeah, that was the question. It's roughly from what we have seen, it's about 20% are being diagnosed today as mutant out of a pool, which is probably 25, roughly. It's small numbers. That's why we need to be careful on those. If you run the numbers though, the mutant pool, of course, is a relatively small pool in the big scheme of things. That's why we believe actually making sure that also wild-type patients, which when you look at the PFS, have 11 months of PFS. If there is no alternative treatments, then you can give the drug also to wild-type patients is a much larger pool. For the elderly and frail, as we said before, they don't really have today big alternative treatments because as we said, the bispecific, we believe, are not an ideal treatment for the elderly and frail in the office-based setting, as I'm talking office-based. Therefore, we believe actually you can pretty much expand from there. To your second questions on the other indications, you know, others have seen their indications being pulled. Of course, you always have that theoretical risk if with your confirmatory study, you're actually not hitting it. Now, this is why we said we were very comforted with the lead-in portion of the phase III trial because, you know, seeing roughly 95% overall response rate is a very good result. It's clearly above what, for example, the AUGMENT study has shown. We believe that this is really reassuring for us that this trial should be the right trial as a confirmatory study. Regarding your third questions on similar or larger acquisition and which focus areas. You know, you have. Of course, we have a strategy, right, that we have communicated to you, and it can be similar size or it can also be larger. I mean, the firepower that we have has not been absorbed in a significant fashion by this deal. You have seen that it was the roughly $250 million upfront, and then you have the earn out. Our overall firepower is not really affected by that. We could also afford, for example, a larger deal. We are absolutely looking at both categories here. The focus areas remain the ones we have communicated on the Capital Markets Day, which can be either the oncology one, solid tumors, dermatological tumors. It can be rare disease, or it can be in neuroscience. Excellent. Can I just clarify on the first question on the DOMA. The screening, everybody's screened for this, and you're finding most of the patients. Is that the right interpretation? Screening 100% and you're finding most of the patients. How many exactly are being tested? I would have to come back to you, but it's a good portion. I couldn't give you right now a number, but it's a significant portion. Okay. Perfect. Thanks very much, David. Once again, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your touch tone phone. We will pause a moment to allow questions to queue. We have a follow-up question from Matt Weston with Credit Suisse. Your line is open. Thank you. Can I just understand, I think this molecule has a history of partners, which I think leaves it with royalties, with deals done in different geographies and other payaways. Could you just remind us of the royalty payaway on the molecule? Were there any milestones remain due to partners? Just remind us who has rights in other geographies and what the relationship is in terms of income that Epizyme will book from those partnerships. Yeah. There are some former deals. You're right to say that. Eisai was initially the owner of that compound. Today, Eisai is responsible only for the Japan sales, and there is no more milestone that are expecting on that side. Other than that, there is a partner for China, and the partner for China is HUTCHMED, and for which there is a license agreement, for which some of the milestones have been already received, and there is expectation to receive some further milestones. All in all, there is not a very significant part of royalties to be paid. This is clearly a product that will have an attractive profile in terms of profitability and gross margin. Okay. Just to check, I thought there was a mid-teens royalty payable to Eisai on US sales. Is that incorrect, Aymeric? Yes. I think there is some royalties to be paid to Eisai, which are in a way limited. Yeah. Okay. Thank you very much. And- Just on- Yeah. Richard Vosser's question. Richard, we looked up the current testing rate, which is 55% estimated testing rate on the mutant patients. It's gonna continue to increase, going up probably to a 70% testing rate. Richard, your line is open. Oh, sorry. Apologies. My follow-up question was just thinking about moving into the earlier lines of follicular lymphoma. My impression is survival is quite a long time in earlier lines. Is there any sort of thoughts about the warning on the label for secondary malignancies? Do you see that having a bearing at all on use in earlier lines? Just your thoughts there would be great. Thanks very much. Yeah. Howard, do you wanna take this? Because we discussed this, obviously. Yes. We've looked very, very carefully at this issue, including all the trials that have been conducted, post-marketing surveillance. We're basically seeing a rate of less than 1% in things like myelodysplastic syndrome in patients that's consistent with the original phase II trial for tazemetostat in FL and epithelioid sarcoma. We don't think that this is an impediment to moving to second-line therapy and potentially earlier. Maybe, Matt, just to come back to your question regarding Eisai. You're right to say that there are royalties in the mid-teens to be paid to Eisai for ex US sales on top of the agreements for Japan, for which Eisai will receive royalties. We'll take our next question from Keyur Parekh from Goldman Sachs. Your line is open. Hi. Thank you. Apologies if this question's been asked already. I was just wondering if you can give us a sense for how you perceive kind of this third and second line market for both kind of follicular lymphoma and DLBCL kind of developing over the next few years. There are lots of competitive studies ongoing and kind of the standard of care there is changing quite quickly. I would be keen to understand better kind of what, due diligence you've done around that and what you think the standard of care looks like over the next three-five years in those settings. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, Keyur. Well, you're absolutely right that this market is becoming quite crowded and very segmented. What we anticipate is that there is a good segment which are more the fit and healthy patients, where either you can give CAR-Ts or the bispecific antibodies, and one might actually be in competition with the other. We see a lot of competition going in there because you see several bispecific antibodies coming in. You also see Monjuvi obviously playing also a bit in that segment because the tolerability profile of Monjuvi is also not the most straightforward. I think there will be a segmentation in the market for the fit and younger patients, a lot who are being treated in the more academic institutions or the larger hospitals, which have the infrastructure to actually handle the side effects. There will be, especially in follicular, since those are mostly elderly patients, but even the more progressed DLBCL patients start also to age because they have also been surviving longer. There will be a good chunk of patients which are more elderly and frail. They often have comorbidities. There you need to really think what you can give, and you need to go for efficacy, but also for tolerability. Especially in the office-based setting, this is gonna be even more important because you don't have the full infrastructure in the office-based setting to take care of some of the side effects in the adequate fashion. We believe the more aggressive therapies are gonna be more often used in the larger, extremely, you know, well-staffed, infrastructure hospitals. That was a simplified version of it, because you can look at this, you know, with all the details, and there are gonna be many patient segments, and there are many crossovers going from one treatment to the others, which are possible, et cetera. Yes, it is a crowded market. On the other side, the market is also increasing because patients actually survive longer. Therefore, you know, I remember I was responsible for Rituxan, MabThera at the time at Roche, and then for the whole oncology and then for all franchises at Roche. Actually, over that time, these markets started to expand because patients were just living longer. You know, you can cycle them through different lines of therapies. Some pools did not even exist at that time, like a third, fourth line or fifth line pools did not exist, and today it exists. You also have to look at that point. Thank you. If I could just follow up on your kind of, you're saying 150 million - 250 million in sales based on current indication. How much of that is current indication in existing geographies versus does it require any geographic expansion for you to get to those numbers? Yeah, we treated that question before, so I'm gonna be very short on this one. This is gonna be incremental, the geographic expansion, because you know, Epizyme did not really have very recent interactions with EMA, and we will have to conduct further payer research, especially with the ASCO data. So far, we were you know, relatively careful on modeling more sales because the payer environment ex US is relatively conservative and tough and you know, several compounds with accelerated approval did not achieve good reimbursement rates. So that's certainly something that we will have to be mindful of. Thank you very much. It appears we have no further questions at this time. I will now turn the program back over to David Loew. Thank you very much, everybody. Thank you for joining, and have a good morning or afternoon. Thank you, though. Bye-bye. This does conclude today's program. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect at any time.