Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Mercialys presentation regarding its 2025 full year results. It will be structured in two parts. First, a presentation by Mercialys' management team, represented by Mr. Vincent Ravat, Group CEO. Afterwards, there will be a Q&A session during which you can ask oral questions through your computer or by joining the conference call. I will now hand over to Mr. Vincent Ravat. Sir, please go ahead. Good morning, everyone. Thank you for attending this presentation of our 2025 full year results. Our presentation today is built around four main messages. First of all, the momentum created by the repositioning of our portfolio. Secondly, the foundations we have put in place to gain the preference of retailers and consumers. Thirdly, the strength of our results and our financial structure. And finally, our distribution policy and our outlook for 2026. 2025 was special for us. In October, we celebrated Mercialys' 25th anniversary. 2025 also marked a change of momentum for the company. For several years now, we have been undergoing a profound transformation of our portfolio. 2025 showed that this strategic change is now well advanced and already bearing fruit. Slide five, we note that there is a general positive consensus about the commercial real estate sector. This is especially the case for the companies with portfolio of assets in the right locations and in the right format. Three factors will support future performance for those companies. First, population is still growing in the suburban areas, while administrative constraints for new supply have increased. The second factor is a tighter consumer spending, which means that everyday low price policies are fundamental to create shoppers' preference. Thirdly, retail and commercial real estate are polarizing, so portfolio selectivity will be central to performance. In the past few years, we have shaped, and we continue to shape our portfolio of assets around these conditions of success. This is why we believe we are among the companies that are well positioned for positive performance forward. Slide six. You can see a summary of the journey we have undertaken to do so, where we come from, where we stand, and where we are aiming soon to be. Our starting point was a dispersed portfolio of hypermarket-dependent assets. Today, we are no longer exposed to any hypermarket dependence. We used to have a portfolio spread across France, often including in areas with low economic dynamism. We have actively refocused our portfolio on the most dynamic regions and metropolitan cities. At the same time, we have strengthened the local dominance of our assets. Today, more than 85% of our assets have more than 50 shops, and this percentage increases every year. In this respect, today, 80% of our portfolio now exceeds 3 million visitors annually, and we have in sight a 95% soon. Finally, within 3 years, our assets will have more than 90% of the consumers' preferred brands in their merchandising mix. Our portfolio is now made up of mostly dominant assets in their local area, no longer just convenience centers. This strategic repositioning is directly reflected in the very positive momentum of our 2025 figures, summed up on slide 7. This is our best overall set of results since 2019. Our EBITDA margin is gaining 40 basis points at 82.4%. Our rental revenues are on the rise despite perimeter effects related to disposals in 2024. Our recurring net income grew year-on-year by a solid +3.9% to EUR 117.5 million. This is the second-highest level of NRE since 2011. At the same time, on a like-for-like basis, the value of our portfolio increased by nearly 4% in the second half of the year to exceed now EUR 3 billion. Our LTV ratio is improving consequently by 260 basis points in six months to 39.5%. And finally, our EPRA NTA is up 8.5% since end of June. Slide 8, we ought to highlight that these financial performances are not temporary nor cyclical. They are here to stay. They are the results of our constructed, coherent, and disciplined model. It is based on the eight strategic pillars of our Shop Park roadmap. Let me recap them. A geographically refocused portfolio. Two, assets of the right size, dominant in their catchment area. Three, selectivity in our assets and in their commercial offer. Four, accessibility in terms of price positioning. 5, industrial and rental diversification to limit rental risk. 6, 7, and 8, cost-efficient asset operation, full commitment to environment. As shown here, these are the pillars that will continue to support both the growth in our retailers' turnover and hence our net rental income growth. This strategy translates into very concrete, concrete terms for our shareholders. On slide 9, provided that our board proposed EUR 1 dividend per share is approved by our general meeting to be held on April 23, 2025, Mercialys would have delivered double-digit return to its shareholders, a total shareholder return of 18.4% and a 10.2% return on equity. Our solid model offers investors a visible, recurring, and distributable cash flow generation. This value creation is accompanied by our commitment to sector-leading ISR ratings and demanding forward ESG trajectory, as illustrated on slide 10. 2025 marks 10 consecutive years of recognition at the highest ISR level for Mercialys. Operationally, we have reduced our greenhouse gas emissions by 57% since 2017, and we are now embarked on a new certified net zero trajectory covering all scopes one, two, and three. We have equipped almost 85% of our centers with charging points. We have brought 86% of our main assets to an excellent or outstanding BREEAM In-Use rating. Last year, we have also obtained the leading score among French SBF 120 companies in terms of gender equality at 96%. As I mentioned earlier, we are repositioned, we have a solid model, and we have momentum. All these elements allow us to set our sights on an attractive medium-term trajectory, detailed slide 11. Over the period 2026-2028, we expect a trajectory of growth of our rental revenues between +5% and +7% on a compound annual basis, of which we consider that between 0%-1% could come from indexation, of which we consider that 1.5%-2% could come from our organic rental growth through more reversion, more variable rent, more casual leasing, and less, and even further less vacancy. The rest of the growth would be contributed by new acquisitions and by our pipeline based on current planning of deliveries. This growth in top line should offset the expected increase of our financial costs. All in all, by 2028, this would support an average net recurrent earnings growth of between +2% and +4%, with a dividend policy targeting an annual payout around 80% of the NRE per share. In any circumstances, our capital allocation will continue to be extremely disciplined, with a goal of a net debt over EBITDA ratio below 8x and an ICR ratio above 3.5x, both well above our bank covenants. We have seen how we have laid solid foundations to deliver a strong and steady financial performance. It is because these foundations drive retailer and consumer preferences locally, that our assets can outperform. Let's see how we do it in detail in the following slides. First of all, it is important to realize that there is a high level of polarization of regional socio-demographic trends across France. Consequently, retail performances have not been equal across all regions. In the past few years, we have followed this polarization to reshape our asset portfolio. As you can see on slide 13, we have focused our portfolio on regional capitals and the French Sun Belt. There is a focus on the areas that capture most of the demographic and economic growth in France. In a country marked by a strong polarization of territories, being positioned in the right geographic areas is a decisive advantage in securing turnover growth. Beyond localization, we have also profoundly changed our marketing and digital approach. Our shop parks have become true omni-channel platforms, capable of generating additional physical traffic from powerful digital levers. Our permanent active asset management is amplified by this industrialized marketing strategy. These are three drivers that we focus our attention on. Firstly, the retail brand's local visibility. We have reached 417 million views of our content in 2025, with a coverage of 100% of the population in our portfolio catchment areas. Second driver, enhancing click and collect and ship from store for our retailers. For 5 years now, we have been offering local logistic solution to our retailers. We will soon reach 1 million visits for package pickups and drop-offs, which themselves drive 25% incremental on-site purchases. Thirdly, we develop exclusive event, either thematic or eco-responsible, that contribute directly to increased on-site traffic and conversion. Preference from consumers also comes from supply. Today, 80% of French consumer favorite brands are present in our shop parks, as you can see on screen. It is an extremely strong marker of the quality and relevance of our current commercial mix. Our strategy is to further concentrate our portfolio offer on the top-of-mind brands, while equally integrating e-commerce players when it reinforces the attractiveness of our sites. Slide 16. This attractiveness is accompanied by a strong discipline on diversification of our exposure to avoid any concentration of operational risks. In 2025, we have re-tenanted 100,000 square meters of our portfolio. That is to say, 14% of our total portfolio surface area. At the same time, we are steadily reducing the share of the top ten tenants in our rent roll from 32% five years ago to 25% today, and then we will reduce it further. Our objective remains unchanged: no individual rental exposure above 3% in the medium term. No, excessive industrial exposure to any retailer either. Slide 17, we present another element driving our positive momentum. In a context where purchasing power remains under pressure, our everyday low price proposition is a real economic shock absorber and a strong footfall and sales driver. It allows retailers to preserve their volumes and consumers to maintain their appetite and satisfy their appetite for acquisition of physical goods. This positioning is clearly an edge on inflation, which translates very concretely into our continuously improving collection rates, reaching 97.8% at the end of 2025. The attractivity of our refocused portfolio is reflected in our business activity on slide 18. In 2025, we have signed nearly 200 leases, a lot of them with new brands in, on our portfolio. This is an increase of 10% compared to 2025, showing the strength of the demand for our assets. These signings mainly concern segments of daily consumption, home equipment, sport, beauty, and accessible catering. Primark, Aroma-Zone, Mango, Adidas, Lidl, Leclerc, Grand Frais, Volfoni, TEDi, Maxi Zoo, B&M, BioTechUSA, Normal are all leading brands in their segment, signed in our portfolio in the last 12 months, with a lot of them being international leaders. All of these levers I have just described resulted in a very clear operational outperformance of our assets in 2025. Slide 19, we can see that over 12 months, our portfolio footfall increased by +3.9%. This is 300 basis points above the national index. Meanwhile, retailer sales also increased by 2.6% over the same period, 280 basis points above the national index. It is worth noting as well that our outperformance in terms of sales versus the French national panel, increased by a further 40 basis points to 340 basis points for the month of December alone. These indicators confirm the relevance of our commercial offer and positioning. Since the beginning of 2026, the first indications are for a continuation of these positive trends. This dynamic is reflected in our other operating indicators. Page 20. Thanks to our strong letting efforts I just described in 2025, our current financial vacancy has dropped to an all-time low of 2% at year-end. At the same time, our retailers occupancy or cost ratio remains among the lowest in the sector at 10.9%, and even lower at 10% if we include the food stores OCR. This combination creates a healthy rental tension, which constitutes a natural lever for positive reversion. In 2025, renewals and relocation were done at 2.2% reversion rate, up 190 basis points from their 2024 level. You will note that we do not include reletting of vacant units, nor short-term contracts in the calculation of our reversion rate. Our future growth will be sustained via not only the organic drivers that we have just seen, but also by our projects pipeline, which will further strengthen our dynamic. As illustrated on slide 21, we have a large portfolio of projects that can be adjusted, activated, or deferred according to the economic context. We will remain very disciplined in our capital allocation, with a strict 10% IRR hurdle rate for deployment. Part of the short and medium-term projects have already been activated to drive our growth in the coming few years. We are currently deploying three categories of projects: strengthening, extension, new creation, which I will illustrate now individually. The first category, page 22, are projects that reinforce existing assets to help them gain local leadership when they do not have it already. Two of these projects are underway in Brest and Niort. In Brest, the opening of the first MSUs, including Leclerc, has already generated an increase of +50% in footfall. We also expect positive reversion on leases for the rest of the asset, as well as a revaluation to come upon completion in September 2026. This asset is becoming the leading asset in Brest metropolis. In Niort, we are following a similar logic: accelerated execution, commercial strengthening, always very significant expected effect on traffic of at least +30%. This reinforcement should also lead to a revaluation of the asset. Secondly, in terms of projects, beyond these reinforcement projects that I just mentioned, we are also deploying extensions to create additional rent on sites that are already dominant, as shown on slide 23. Our approach is very simple. We capitalize on assets that are already leaders, and we add additional attractiveness features. Two illustrations here. In Grenoble, we will create a daily gourmet promenade and add MSUs by gaining uncommon areas. Our project is already 80% pre-let. Work will start soon, and we expect +20% additional net rent for the asset. In Angers, we have acquired 1.6 hectares of land immediately adjacent to our leading local Shop Park. We will be filing administrative authorization in 2026 for a 15,000 square meter potential retail development. Our target is to increase our total rent on this site by 15% upon completion. This sequence CapEx-light development with quick returns are best illustrated by the transformation example over time of our Toulouse Shop Park on slide 24. This is a textbook Mercialys business case, a consistent step-by-step transformation strategy that gradually increases the retail offer, overall quality, and attendance of the site. Around 10 years ago, we owned a convenience center with a hypermarket and 24 shops with 2 million footfall. It was already not bad at the time for this type of neighborhood asset. In 10 years, we have grown this asset retail offer to 130, 130 shops and restaurants, with more than 6.6 million visitors in 2025, and footfall continued to grow by another 3% in January. Our additional ongoing new projects initiatives have a clear ambition for this asset: to exceed 7.5 million visits within 3 years and become the number one asset in terms of footfall in the Toulouse metropolis area. Finally, our third category of projects on page 25 consist of new creation on selected geographies and secured land plots. In Saint-André, in the Réunion Island, we are developing a mixed-use business park on a land reserve we already own. In an area with low commercial density and favorable consumption dynamics, our project is fully authorized, already pre-let on more than 80% of its total retail GLA of 11,000 square meters. There is little complexity in the development scheme, and our approach is CapEx frugal, with an expected yield on cost above 8.5%. In Ferney-Voltaire, on a plot of land bordering Geneva, we are targeting a 17,000 square meter mixed-use development in partnership. The yield on cost is expected above 8%. Given the attractiveness and wealthiness of this cross-border area, we have already received retailers' box of interest for over 80% of the total GLA. Together with our developments, our acquisitions are part of a very disciplined investment logic, improving quality, strengthening leadership, and creating value quickly. Slide 26, we see that we invested EUR 176 million in 2025 for an average return of around 9%, with value creation already visible. NAV is up by more than 20% in the scope concern. We intend to pursue our investment campaign in 2026, which could reach up to EUR 100 million, depending on our level of disposals. We already have specific acquisition targets in sight. We are giving here, on page 26, the example of a retail park adjacent to our Toulouse asset that we are targeting in order to consolidate the local market share of this Shop Park, as explained earlier. Our post-acquisition model is also industrialized. We act on four levels: improving merchandising, vacancy, expenses, and ancillary revenues. As you can see on slide 27, with the case of Saint-Genis Shop Park, acquired last year. We have already signed one new lease with Maxi Zoo, and we have active leads with new retailers like Mango, Decathlon, or Aroma-Zone. Our goals in 2026 are to, 1, reduce vacancy by 50%; 2, increase rent by 5%; 3, reduce charges by at least 10%; and 4, develop specialty leasing income by +10%. Overall, in the medium term, our ambition is to create additional appraisal value of +30% to +40% of the acquisition price. Beyond our organic growth and project pipelines, we now fully own another growth engine, the ImmoCom Partners Asset Management platform. As at beginning of 2026, the platform has 33 retail parks under management, approximately 400,000 square meters of GLA for EUR 40 million in annual net rental income. ImocomPartners provides us with a platform of expertise and asset-light growth, with recurring revenues that could be comforted by operational strategies, synergies. In the medium term, there is a strong potential of value creation with the launch of new funds and the ramp-up of asset under management, which would contribute positively to our EBITDA growth. Slide 30. I will now move on to financial results and funding metrics. Let's start with rental revenues. Our rental revenues reached EUR 180.6 million at end 2025. On a pro forma basis, taking into account the temporary IFRS accounting impacts related to already relet spaces of West and North, detailed on the bottom right of this slide, our rental revenues grew by +1.7% compared to 2024. This growth includes a total negative scope effect of EUR 2,024, offset by EUR 2,025 acquisitions. This highlights our organic performance. Indeed, on a like-for-like basis, our gross rental revenues increased by +2.8%. It is important to note that we are talking here about gross rental revenues from indexation and leasing activity only. Our figure of +2.8% does not include doubtful debtors effect, nor JV marketing or other type of fees.... Beyond the growth of the top line, we have embarked on a structured approach to optimize our cost base. Slide 31. In 2025, we launched the first operational deployments of artificial intelligence in our back office with three very concrete objectives: automating recurring functions with low added value, optimizing commercial and rental management processes, and using our data to accelerate decision-making and pro rata temporis effects. Over time, we expect associated productivity gains could contribute to +0.25 to +0.5 points of additional EBITDA margin. If we move on to the analysis of the evolution of our Net Recurrent Earnings on slide 32, we see here that our EBITDA increased by EUR 1.7 million. This brings the EBITDA margin to 82.4%. Our financial expenses grew by EUR 6 million in the meantime. This change is mainly due to the increase in debt marginal cost and to our refinancing operations. The change of our other operating items amounting to, as I mentioned earlier, to EUR 5.1 million, is mainly due to indemnities received for early lease termination. IFRS standards imposed an accounting treatment outside rental income. It is worth noting that more than 90% of the GLA concerned by these indemnities I've just mentioned, has already been relet. The new rents will take effect in 2026 and 2027 after store setup period, hence our pro forma presentation two slides ago. Finally, change in equity associates and non-controlling interests have been mostly impacted by the change in the consolidation method of the ImocomPartners fund management company, and the impacts of change of other minority interests due to acquisitions and disposals. On the basis of these elements, our net recurrent earnings stood at EUR 117.5 million for 2025. Its increase is +3.9% over 12 months. This represents 1.26 EUR per share, also up +3.9%. This performance is at the top end of the range of the guidance we revised last year. Slide 33. Our operating performance, rent growth, and net acquisitions are also reflected in the positive evolution of the valuation of our portfolio. In 2025, the value of our portfolio exceeded the EUR 3 billion mark, up 10.1% over 12 months. This increase was driven by a positive rent effect for +2% and a scope effect for +8%. Meanwhile, capitalization rates stayed stable. Our appraisal yield remained flat at 6.65%, maintaining a premium of more than 300 basis points over the risk-free rate. This leaves potential for further revaluation, given the current operational strength of our asset base and the associated level of our key performance indicators. Slide 34. This portfolio revaluation is reflected in our NAV. EPRA net tangible assets came to 16.96 EUR per share, up +8.5% over six months and +4.1% over twelve months. The positive change over 12 months takes into account the following impacts: the payment of EUR 1 of dividends, the net recurrent earnings growth for +EUR 1.26, the positive change in unrealized capital gains for EUR 1.41, including a negative effect linked to the change in valuation rates and positive effect linked to rents, and, fourth, other items in relation to the accounting for -EUR 0.99, mainly in relation to amortization and depreciation. I remind you that our accounting is on the historical cost method. Regarding our EPRA NDV, it is up +9.5% over six months and +5.1% over our year to reach EUR 17.29 per share. Slide 35, we highlight that our current performance and our future growth remain supported by a robust financial structure. At the end of 2025, our banking covenant LTV, excluding duties, stood at 40.4%. Note that the LTV on screen is not taking into account the financial lease associated with our Lyon acquisition. Including this financial lease, our LTV stood at 39.5%, including rights at end of December. It is down 260 basis points over six months. These levels are all much lower than the 55% banking covenant that applies to all our confirmed bank lines. Our ICR ratio stood at 4.9 times as of December thirty-first, well above the minimum level set by our covenants. Both our ICR ratio and net debt over EBITDA ratio were partially impacted at end of December by the pro rata temporis effect of the acquisition of Saint-Genis in Lyon, which occurred in June. We had more debt, but half the EBITDA contribution. Note also that on October 17, Standard & Poor's reiterated Mercialys' triple-B stable outlook rating. Slide 36. As you know, in June 2025, Mercialys issued a EUR 300 million bond, oversubscribed five times, with a maturity of 7 years. This emission illustrated investors' confidence in the credit quality of the company. It is intended to allow the redemption of the EUR 300 million bond maturing this month and carrying a coupon of 1.8%. At the end of December 2025, the average maturity of our drawn debt was 3.5 years. We also maintain a high level of coverage of our fixed rate debt at 89%. Additionally, Mercialys also has EUR 390 million of undrawn financial resources. All of our undrawn bank resources include ESG criteria. I hope that with these results and through this presentation, we have shown that Mercialys combines portfolio strength, high recurrent profitability, balance sheet discipline, and a high growth potential. Building on these strengths, we expect a solid 2026 performance. We are targeting an earnings per share of at least EUR 1.29, with a dividend of at least EUR 1 per share. Our underlying growth of earnings shall be supported by continued strong retail operating performance, with continued footfall and retail sales growth. It will be supported by the positive impacts of our dynamic leasing, by the ramp-up of some of our projects, and by positive impacts of 2025 and new 2026 acquisition, and as well, a continued focus with a continued focus on cost discipline. Our guidance also incorporates and reflects the increased and mention of our cost of debt and the effect of disposals associated with our permanent asset rotation policy. Well, that is all for me for today. Thank you for listening, and, we can now follow up with the Q&A session. If you wish to ask a question, you may do so in one of the two ways: through your computer by clicking on the green hand button on the audio player to enter the queue. Once your line is activated, you will see a message to unmute your microphone. Please make sure to do so. You can also ask your question by joining the conference call and dialing hashtag five on your telephone keypad. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial hashtag six. The next question comes from Florent Laroche-Joubert from Oddo BHF. Please go ahead. Good morning, Vincent. So thank you very much for, for this presentation. I would ask maybe one or two questions. So my first question would be on your development and investment plan. So could you give us maybe more colors on the CapEx you are able or you wish to invest in the coming years for a year? And maybe also what would be the targeted credit profile for the next year? So do you still target maybe LTV ratio below around 40%? And maybe also, would it be possible to have some more colors on the deliveries for the pipeline that you expect? Okay, we'll start with maybe your second question. In terms of pipeline delivery, basically what you can expect for 2026, the delivery of small projects that are CapEx light, that we started in 2024 and 2025, and that will contribute to additional rents in our project. I mentioned about Brest and Lyon. We are talking there about building walls to separate the unit, to transform it, and then to create reversion on the former space. We have also other initiatives like in Grenoble, that will be due a little bit later, but basically at the moment, what we are focusing on is strengthening our portfolio, and that's the type of delivery you can expect for 2026 and 2027. In terms of acquisition, I mentioned a potential about EUR 100 million. As you know, and as I mentioned, it will also depend on the amount of disposal that we will realize during the year. We are always looking at the liquidity and rotation of our portfolio because this is important to support our confidence in the level of valuation of our assets, and then to contribute to general liquidity of the company. Depending on these disposals, we estimate that we have firepower of around EUR 100 million for 2026. The balance between investment, new acquisitions, disposal and CapEx is always with in mind for us an adamant criteria of maintaining our triple B perspective stable rating from S&P. There are sets of criteria that S&P shares with us that are required, and we stick by them in a very orthodox way. So, don't think that we will put that in danger in any sorts of way. We feel confident that we can both invest and maintain those criteria and those, and this balance sheet equilibrium. Okay. So that means that we can target potential acquisition or investment for EUR 100 million within the next 12 months, and then we'll see what you are able to do for the next years, 2027 and 2028. Yeah. Plus, some potential disposal if we deem them interesting at the time, with, of course, the pro rata effects of any acquisitions when they occurs and when we communicate on them. But in your guidance, there is no new acquisition included in the guidance, and today you have no very advanced discussion significant to be added, maybe later in the guidance. We always include all parameter effects in our guidance, and these parameter effects can be from acquisitions, from disposal, but also from variation in our PNL. I mentioned about the financing cost increase. What we provide to the investor is something that is clear, the management of how we invest, how we sell assets, how much value we create is ours. It's our job. What we give you is something that is visibility on what we will deliver in terms of Net Recurrent Earnings per share for the year to come. Okay. Thank you very much. The next question comes from Valérie Guezi from [Equity Research Analyst] (Exane BNP Paribas). Please go ahead. Hello. Hi, good morning. Just maybe a follow-up question on the previous question about your investment strategy and capital allocation. You—in terms of how you think about your pipeline, you said you have criteria of 10% IRR. Currently in your pipeline, do you have projects that you know are above this hurdle rate? And if you do, you know, why don't you launch them? I mean, I guess my question is how you think about development versus acquisition, and maybe to finish also how you think about share buyback in this context. I've got another question to ask you. I'll ask the question after. Good morning, Valérie. This is an interesting question. This is part of what's thrilling in our jobs to make the right choices of capital allocation. Our belief is that any investment should provide return within a short-term period. So when we see that we can either launch or start projects with low CapEx and high yield, that can be compressed down with short-term delivery, we do it, especially if they strengthen our assets. When we see that we have very relative acquisition potential, we will go for them because they are immediately contributive, especially if we think we can improve the KPIs of those assets. So what we have in mind is short-term delivery on capital allocation. That's the driver, plus a level of yield that's highly relative. And it's the combination of the two that's important. So, no investment below 8% yield on cost, but then the difference between something that's long-term at 8% and something that's short-term at a little bit lower yield makes a lot of difference in our choices. Okay. Thank you. Maybe... So you didn't answer about share buyback quite. How do you think about that versus acquisition and development? I said in many roadshows in the past that I thought buying back shares was less interesting than investing in our industrial know-how. Now, seeing how our shares trade, and have been trading, over the past year lagging or with a discount inadequate, in my mind, between the strength of our underlying performance and where our shares stand relatively. It's true that I started to ask myself, and this is a discussion we had with the board, of the possibility of buying back shares. We have not decided to do so in this sequence of results, but this is a thinking that's clearly in our mind. Okay, thank you. And, I've got another question about, you know, your recent acquisition and, and Saint-Genis, you said during the presentation that the, assets, valuation were up more than 20%, you know, since you, since you bought it over the past six months. So I just wanted to understand, what happened. I mean, was it a lucky buy, or did you do anything to improve, you know, the, the, the valuation of the assets, over the past few months, if you could share some, details? Thank you. You know, in the last five years or more, we have been transforming assets that are disliked into powerhouses. The assets I'm talking about are assets that somehow have no name. They are not retail parks, they are not convenience centers, they are not hypermarket galleries. They are in between. They are dominant. They are assets that can become dominant in their local areas. They are assets that have an amplitude of offer that's very wide. They are assets that are convenient, that are low cost. And this category that we have named shopping park, because it bears no name, really embodied by our Shop Park brand, is a category that was overlooked and little looked by investors. When we went for the Saint-Genis acquisitions, we faced little competition in those bids. Probably I should not say that too much publicly because that could attract investor in the future. But on these categories, as I said, where we see huge potential and we deliver strong performance, there are little investors showing up. And so when you have a willing seller and you have a few counterparts as buyers, you make good deals, and the yields that we reach later on reflects the stability and the lower risk on the cash flows. We have a lot of assets that are not considered prime shopping malls, wrongly, where we had zero vacancy in the last 10 years because they are in secondary cities in France, and where the risk on the performance is limited, which should definitely be translated into the valuation yield. So yes, for the assets that we work on, there is a big discrepancy between the yield as a reflection of the transaction on the market and the yield as a reflection of the risk on operational performance and on the recurrence of cash flows. Thank you. Very clear. Thank you very much. The next question comes from Amal Aboulkhouatem from Degroof Petercam. Please go ahead. Yes, sir. Good morning, Vincent, and, congratulations for this result. I have two questions on my side. The first one would be on the operational performance. When it comes to retail sales, but also footfall, is there any base effect to see behind these strong results as 2024 was impacted by the Casino transition? Could that be an explanation for your strong outperformance? Good morning, Amal. It's interesting you asking this question because this is something I failed to mention. Actually, our footfall performance in 2025 did not include the assets where the base effect could have been extremely positive because it would have warped our overall performance to a level that would not have been credible. So basically, for instance, the Brest assets indeed has a huge base effect between 2024 and 2025, but it's not included in our report of footfall growth. The footfall growth comes from the other assets where we have a basis of comparison that's equal. So it's really and the performance that we are publishing are really the underlying performance of our model. Thank you. Not related to base effect. Thank you. Okay. Second question would be, again, on the investment policy and strategy. Just, so we see you did a very great acquisition in 2025. How do you look at the market in 2026? Do you think this is replicable? Meaning that, do you see still potential targets that would, let's say, tick all the boxes at still attractive prices? You mentioned the retail park adjacent to your Toulouse portfolio, your Toulouse asset, but have you identified more potential targets at this stage? Yes, we are clear on the targets that we would like to acquire. We have a set list that we are looking at. We still see few potential buyers. Probably it's because all those assets, and this is true for commercial real estate in general, are difficult to manage. We have a specific know-how that we know how to apply on those assets that a lot of investors, especially non-specialists, cannot replicate easily. And therefore, the yields on acquisition could reflect that, meaning being quite high. After the difficulty is more on the vendor side, where we see vendors hesitating because probably they see what we do, and they think maybe there is a possibility. So that limits little bit the number of assets on sale, but we are very confident that there will be... there are opportunities currently. And also the fact that, because the yields are high, the bank having a little bit more confidence about commercial real estate, tend to refinance those potential vendors who hold the asset, which slows little bit the dynamic of rotation on the market. But there are enough products that we like on the market for us to deliver what I just presented. .... And is any, like, plan to look at acquisition outside of France? Despite all the political and economic turmoil in France, we still like the country. It has a very stable consumption base. We think, as we mentioned, that when we are focused on the right geographies, there is still a lot of potential. So that's our main focus. We are strong in France. We know the market to each in each millimeter square of it. And so that's where we believe we can deliver most. Now, there is always this question of diversifying our, of our rental base, of the fact that our share drag, our comparative share drag to our performance could also be related to some defiance from investors about any companies too exposed to France. And so this is also a question that, the board and I, discuss and that, we look at. Okay. Thank you very much, Quentin. Thank you, Amal. The next question comes from Benjamin Legrand Kepler. Please go ahead. Hi, Vincent. Thanks for the presentation. I have actually a few questions. You mentioning disposals, but I was just wondering what kind of assets would you be disposing? Would it be smaller, non-core assets, or would you be looking at mature assets? And then on your acquisition plan, which would be financed through disposals, would you also be looking at new equity going forward? And related to that, your guidance for 2028, I mean, the midterm is on earnings per share, right? It's not earnings only. I mean, if you do equity raise, that's that would be it for me. Good morning, Benjamin. In terms of disposal, what we've always said, and we continue to say and think, is the fact that there is no trophy asset in our portfolio. Basically, the key for a REIT like us is to have full liquidity on the whole portfolio, not liquidity on a small part, and then the rest overvalued, and there's no ability to be sold. So anything could be sold. If it's at the right price, valued properly by the market, we could consider selling it. And we've shown in the last six years that basically we are ready to dispose of anything if the purchase circumstances are the right ones. So there are multiple options. We have demand on some assets. People see the job that we are doing, especially locally. We have an average asset value of around EUR 70 million, which provides us many options in terms of seller type. So anything is possible. And then, obviously, depending on the amount of what we could sell, then we would look at reallocating in order to be able to deliver the guidance that you have on screen, you must have still on screen right now. In terms of equity raise, this is something that we mentioned in roadshows. We saw that what some of our peers have done. We think this is clever. It's true that our stock trades at a huge discount, which creates a harder right to for to have relative acquisition a bit more complicated. But if we estimate that there are fantastic opportunities on the market, that could be relative for our shareholders... great for the company overall portfolio strength. Yeah, we will consider looking at the option of equity raise. Okay, that's, that's very clear. Thank you. As a reminder, if you wish to ask a question, you may do so in one of the two ways: through your computer by clicking on the green hand button on the audio player to enter the queue. Once your line is activated, you will see a message to unmute your microphone. Please make sure to do so. You can also ask your question by joining the conference call and dialing hashtag five on your telephone keypad. If you wish to withdraw your question, please dial hashtag six. The next question comes from Alex Kolsteren from Van Lanschot Kempen. Please go ahead. Hi, Vincent. Good morning. Thank you for the presentation. I think my colleagues asked most questions, but I have one remaining. In that growth outlook, what do you assume will happen with the reletting of the hypermarket maturing next year, summer? Sorry, I could not hear precisely. What you're asking is the potential reversion on the hypermarket reletting? Yeah. Is that sort of accounted for in that growth outlook, 5%-7%? Yeah, basically, the hypermarket transformation is part of our overall strategy. When we cut the hypermarket size related to new units, this creates a reversion. At the moment, it's not accounted for in the reversion that we have published, or at least none of these operations are accounted for in the numbers of reversion that we have published for last year. Yeah, that's, that's understood, but, I'm more talking about the outlook for 2026-2028, and then the organic growth figure is 1.5%-2%. So my question is, is part of that 1.5%-2% accounted for by the reletting of hypermarket space to normal hypermarket tenants? Yeah, of course. We count on these reletting to not only contribute to organic growth, but also contribute to the strength of our retail assets. This was part of our strategy. Remember back in 2015 and 2016 when we said we are buying hypermarket walls in order to be able to transform them, because we see that the hypermarket is changing and the operators will have to reduce their space to concentrate on food only. And so those spaces will have to be reconfigured. It's better to be in control of that reconfiguration as we are, because we can do what is good for us instead of suffering the potential consequences of those reconfiguration as a witness. Yeah. All right. That's clear. Thank you. If you wish to ask a question, please go ahead. I think there are no further questions, so I think we'll end this conference on that. I thank you all, and I wish you a very pleasant day and a very pleasant result season.