Ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Michelin 2024 H1 results conference call. I now hand over to Mr. Florent Menegaux, Chief Executive Officer, and Mr. Yves Chapot, General Manager and Group CFO. Gentlemen, please go ahead. Thank you. Good morning and good evening to everyone. Yves Chapot and myself are very pleased to host you for our midyear results. Before unveiling these results, I would like to start by emphasizing our key Michelin in Motion strategy. We are building a worldwide leader in life-changing composites and experiences, and for that, we leverage four key differentiating assets across enlarged playgrounds. The assets, you can see them on your screen, of course, highly engaged and talented teams, a powerful and widely recognized brand, strong innovation leadership, and unique R&D and industrial capabilities, and defining products and services. All of that into enlarged playgrounds. Of course, we have our historic activities in tires, but now you have services and experiences on a wide range of activities and our polymer composite solution as well. As shared during our latest CMD, a wide variety of destination markets ensures our performance resilience. We operate in different market verticals that you see on your screen, and we have balanced activities across three worldwide geographies. That ensures the resilience of our performance. Without further delays, we are pleased to share our strong performance in the first semester. Start with our Segment Operating Income, reaching 13.2% of sales in H1, with a strong cash flow generation. We have operated in a tire market distorted by high inflows of budget tires across the entire world, with group value-driven approach generated a strong increase in mix. We have generated a strong operating income from 13.2% of sales compared to 12.1% in H1 2023, and we have a strong cash flow generation before acquisition of EUR 669 million, driven by disciplined budget business management. If I zoom in into the market environment, the tire selling markets were positive in the period but inflated by very high exports of Asian tires into replacement markets. Oil markets have been sharply down in business to business and gradually deteriorating in business to consumer. Our polymer composite solutions markets are temporarily soft relative to a H1 2023 comparative. Our groups focused on value accretive segments and regions translate into a strong 1.9% mix improvement, more than offsetting the negative price effects from indexation clauses in contractual businesses. Our sales ended at EUR 13.5 billion, down 3.1%, excluding the currency effect. I now zoom in into our operational performance. In automotive, we have enjoyed further growth in operating margin despite the negative impact of indexation clauses and supported by a strong mix and continued strong and continuous mix improvement. Road transportation, strong margin recovery with price and mix benefiting from targeted market approach and growing contribution from connected solutions. In the specialty segment, we have a high 16.8% margin in adverse context from weak OE, especially in agricultural or construction, and price indexation clauses, high prior year comparative in mining and polymer composite solution. Overall, we had a favorable operating cost across all business lines in terms of raw materials, energy, and sea freight. Then if I tell a little, little bit our free cash flow performance, our segment EBITDA has reached EUR 2.8 billion or 20.4% of our sales, up 1.6 points versus the H1 2023, and our working capital has been benefiting from efficient inventory management and softer volume. Overall, we maintain our 2024 guidance with segment operating income exceeding EUR 3.5 billion at constant exchange rate and free cash flow exceeding EUR 1.5 billion before acquisition. I now hand over to Yves Chapot, who is going to give you further details. Thank you, Florent. Good morning, and good evening, everyone. So beyond the strong business performance that were highlighted by Florent, the group is continuing to deliver and to continue to create value on the people and planet dimensions as well. As it is illustrated on this slide, we have continuously improved in the number of women in managerial position by nearly one point at 36.6%, 30.6%, sorry. And we have also slightly improved our performance in terms of safety with the total key incident rate at 1. Our ambition being during the year to go below 1. I will come back on the profit dimension later on. And on the planet, two key indicators where we are very proud of what has been achieved by our team. Reduction of CO₂ emissions, Scope 1 and 2, so either the energy that we purchase or the energy that we produce, by 7.2% versus H1 2023. And, a reduction in water withdrawal by 6.3% versus the first semester of 2023. A very important event as well for our team regarding the planet, our CO₂, our greenhouse gas reduction targets have been validated by the SBTi and, has been considered as compatible with the Paris Agreement of, an increase in the average temperature by 1.5 degree, by the end of the century versus pre-industrial world. So now, looking at the market, markets have been distorted by very strong inflows of budget tires, mostly in passenger car and light truck and truck for replacement. Overall, the passenger car market has grown by 3% during the semester, which in fact is hiding a decrease of 1% for original equipment (OE) and an increase of 4% for replacement. The decrease of 1% in original equipment (OE) has been specifically strong in Europe, with the market landing at -5%, when China was at +5%, mostly pulled by the export of vehicles. And on the replacement side, although both Europe and Americas are posting, respectively, +6% and +4%, it was mostly driven by the import of tires from Asia. On the truck side, we are seeing exactly a phenomenon which is very similar. Market overall at +2%, but with OE at -5%, with a strong decrease in Europe, -17%, and North America, -9% for original equipment (OE), when South America was rebounding after a very low 2023. On the replacement side, the market is at +4%, mostly pulled by the strong performance of North America, +17%, but of which most of the growth is coming from the import of tires, particularly from Thailand, in anticipation of potential duties that were effectively adopted, but that will be enforced only from September onward. On the specialty side, the mining market is, the consumptions of tires is, let's say, growing slightly, but mining are, on one side, decreasing their inventories. We are also seeing, in parallel, if I look at the off-highway transportation, a strong drop of original equipment (OE) markets in agriculture, construction, and material handling. While replacement is more resilient, but we have to keep in mind that in this market, original equipment (OE) and replacement are, let's say, weighing nearly the same for the same amount of this market. Aircraft is still growing, and the two wheels market is also recovering after a very poor 2023. Now, looking at our sales, so you observe that our sales were down by 3.1% at constant forex. The scope effect is mostly coming from FCG. The volume effect at -4.4% is very strong in specialties, -7.2%, mostly driven by the beyond road original equipment (OE) and some mining adjustments linked to inventory adjustments and less sales in Central Asia. Transportation, so SR2, at -4.7%, and automotive at -1.9%, with a strong mix effect at +1.9%, when the price effect at -0.8% is mostly coming from the application of raw material and energy clauses in our contractual business. Non-tire are flat, but with a high level of comparative for during the H1 of 2023. And currencies are weighing negatively on our top line, mostly coming from currencies such as Turkish lira, the Japanese yen, the Chilean pesos, or the Chinese yuan. Sorry. So, looking now at the segment operating income, like for like, our segment operating income increased by EUR 100 million, which is an outstanding performance. So, if I eliminate both the currency and the scope effect, it's +EUR 100 million, and it's +EUR 127 million, if I exclude only the currency. It's probably a record high operating margin at 13.2%, 110 basis points over the H1 of 2023. With the volume, which is weighing negatively at EUR 325 million, a very strong mix effect of EUR 189 million compensate the effect of the clauses on the price side. We benefit from a strong tailwind related to raw material, energy, transportation, of nearly EUR 450 million. SG&A are increasing by EUR 100 million, mostly driven by inflation and labor cost inflation. Non-tire has a slightly negative contribution on that bridge due to a combination of multiple factors, but mostly the decrease of the volumes in the conveyor belt businesses, which is, let's say, a contractual effect. Now, looking at the performance by segment, you can observe that, despite volume being down by 1.9%, SR1 increased its segment operating income by 5.6%, with an increase in margin of 1.1 points. SR2 is showing a very strong recovery from 5% operating margin to 9.2%. It's a main contributor to the group improvement in the segment operating income. And here also, despite the volume dropped by 4.7%, revenue grew up by 3.9%. Of course, the segment is impacted by the clauses, particularly on the original equipment (OE). But our teams has been able to strongly valorize our offer, both at OEM and fleet. And we benefit in this segment from positive market and geographical mix. It's important to notice that this segment does not yet benefit from the consequence of the footprint decision that we announced end of 2023 and early 2024. It should start to pay off in 2025. SR3, with volumes down by 7.9%, 7.2%, is of course impacted, but is still posting a margin at nearly 17%, which is in line with our ceiling, our threshold, sorry, for this segment. The cash flow generation in this context is positive for the H1 of the year. Generally, it's so before we started to enter into a more volatile environment with the COVID in 2020, but before this period, our cash flow was around EUR 100 million during the H1. So we post EUR 669 million, mostly coming from a very strong EBITDA at 20.4%. A change in working capital, which is, of course, negative. It's linked to the seasonality of our working capital, and the group is partially building inventories ahead of the winter season. And generally, we have a strong inflow of cash during the last three months of the year. So it's a moderate increase of working capital, thanks to the steering, the business steering. The other elements are in line with our expectations. I just want to highlight also the positive contribution of our joint ventures, mostly coming from TBC, EUR 100 million dividend, which was paid during the Q1. Our gearing has improved. Our net debt has decreased versus the 30th of June 2023 by nearly EUR 400 million. Knowing that, if you look at the bridge, the construction of the net debt, we have already booked during the H1 the full effect of the share buyback, although only 50% of this program has been done at the end of last week. So the gearing is solid at 23.9%. It mechanically increased our ways at the end of June versus the end of December. Maybe the main event of the semester is the upgrade of our long-term debt by Moody's from A3 to A2, and the notation by Scope, which is a European rating agency, who started to note our debt and rate us at A. So very, very positive and very healthy balance sheet at the end of the semester. So before moving to our full year guidance, I would like to come back on some aspect of our strategy that we have highlighted during our last Capital Markets Day, our value approach. It can be summarized by the sentence that we want to win where it matters. So we are looking to maximize the value creation for our customers, as well as for other stakeholders. At original equipment (OE), we are relying, as Florent mentioned in the introduction, a very strong innovation, brand power, very strong partnership with some of these customers, and the loyalty that is generating on the replacement market. So we try to maximize the value creation on these segments as well. On the replacement, we are trying to focus on value accretive segments, which are not necessarily the ones that are today the biggest in volume, but it's the only segment of the market that are growing faster than the average of their segment. Typically, high power tractors in agriculture with large tires or tracks, or of course, the premium 18-inch and above tires in the SR1 segment. So some concrete example of this strategy, looking at the three reporting segments, starting by SR1. Our share of 18-inch and above tires at the Michelin brand, both in replacement and original equipment (OE), has increased by an increment of 5 points during the semester, as we did for the last 3 or 4, 4 or 5 years. Which contribute generally over a year of nearly EUR 100 million of sustainable mix effect impact on our EBIT. And this segment of the market, 18-inch and above, were growing by 12%, during the semester. On SR2, the Choose and Focus strategy had led the teams to focus on mostly Europe and the Americas, to have a more targeted approach in the other regions, or to look at some niche where we can really create value. For example, for dangerous goods in some regions such as China, for example. So we are looking to capture markets that represent 50% of the market value, although it's less in volume, which are characterized by fleet looking at premium suppliers, tech oriented, so with a strong contribution of our Connected Mobility offers, and fleets that are also looking at their environmental impact, and that are looking to lower their environmental impact. Regarding SR3, you see several example of business segments from material handling, to mining, to high tech agricultural tracks or conveyors, or as well as marine inflatable boats, where thanks to the technological leadership of the group, we can offer different products that are very differentiated from the competitions, and that are contributing to our customers' performance and value creation. So this example shows that the, when we are looking to win where it matters, we have in all three reporting segments very concrete examples of this strategy. Now, looking forward for the H2 of the year, we have not changed our hypothesis regarding the passenger car, light truck, and truck market outside China. We consider that these markets will probably evolve in a range of -2% or +2% versus last year. Probably two inflection versus the H1 of the year, we should see a lower impact on the Asian imports, particularly, for example, for truck tire replacement in North America in the H2. In all the markets, we are seeing an erosion of OE volumes that has, let's say, gradually increased over the Q2 and should continue during the H2 of the year. We should not forget that in the previous years, the original equipment (OE) market, particularly in truck, has been impacted by the anticipation on the regulations, particularly linked to the emissions of the vehicles. In specialties, we have lowered our input market hypothesis for, let's say, range around 0 to something between 0 and -4. Mining tires, the demand remain there fundamentally, but we observe a gradual stock reduction at customer level along the year. It's not dramatic, it's just, let's say, reduction of some weeks, we are not speaking in months. The beyond tire markets will be flat on replacement, but very negatively impacted on the original equipment (OE), particularly in agriculture and construction. Two wheels is a more seasonal business, so H2 is weighing less than H1. In aircraft, we should come back to normal growth before versus the pre-COVID reference base. And in polymer composite solutions, overall markets are soft across verticals, mostly because 2023 was a very high reference base. And we are also observing some destocking across industries. So based with this hypothesis, we have slightly lowered down our volume hypothesis for the year, in a range of -2 to -5. We consider that our operating performance, net of inflation, should be slightly positive. Of course, it was strongly positive during the H1, but the tailwind that we observe in raw material of energy will of course erode and maybe become negative, particularly for some raw materials, such as butadiene or natural rubber. Our CapEx hypothesis are in line with what we have announced at the beginning of the year. So there is no fundamental reasons to modify our guidance, and we are confident that we should achieve a segment operating income above EUR 3.5 billion, and a free cash flow before acquisition above EUR 1.5 billion. Having said that, I think, Florent, we can start with the Q&A session. Thank you, Yves. Now we are all ears to your questions. Thank you, sir. Ladies and gentlemen, if you wish to ask a question, please press star and one on your phone keypad. Please ask your questions in English. The first question comes from Harry Martin of Bernstein. Hi, good evening, everyone. So I'll ask one question on the passenger tire business and then one on RS2. So in RS1, I wondered if you could confirm whether the 5 percentage points of improvement in the 18-inch tire mix means year-on-year growth in that segment, in the premium segment. And on your estimates, does that mean that you gain share either on value or volume? And then on the margin recovery in RS2, I mean, you presented the plan at the CMD to get the RS2 margins back to above 10%, but the speed of improvement here is really notable in the context of the OE weakness and the Asian imports into the US as well. Could you give us some more color on the drivers of that margin improvement? It sounds like fleet management solutions are contributing, so any color on how significant those are would be really useful. Thank you. Okay. So, I will start. So in our SR1, yes, we have seen a sharp improvement in the overall content of our sales into higher mix. Now, in relative terms, the markets are moving, so overall, we are pleased with the way it develops. I would not comment further on this. On the SR2, there are stronger drivers. Of course, all the plans we have detailed about how we plan to restructure that activity by what Yves has explained, winning where it matters. We have strongly focused on where we can demonstrate our performance and where we have willingness to pay for our performance by our customers. That includes OE, that includes replacement markets, and we will further see some improvement in this market due to the restructuring of our overall capacities that we don't see yet. Because right now we are not as efficient as we could be because we are moving down some production in some plants, while ramping up and industrializing in other plants to offset the remaining margins. So, the remaining is the volumes. So we are sure that we are confident that the segment two will get to the performance expected. Now, of course, I know it's tempting to always look at improvement in a linear manner, but of course, unfortunately, we cannot reach that performance all the time. Or we would like, if we can, do it, we will do it, but things cannot go to the sky all the time. But we are confident in our ability to deliver on our commitment. And it's mostly for SR2, the main driver is a chosen focus, so the focus on either the geography or the business segments. And also a very positive contribution of our connected fleet businesses, which is very now accretive to this segment operating margin. But through that, we can demonstrate the performance of our offer. Next question. Very clear. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from Monica Bosio of Intesa Sanpaolo. Yes, good evening, and thanks for taking my questions. I have two. Can you give us an update on the dealers' inventory situation for the different segments? And the second one, I suppose that the -0.8% negative pricing is entirely attributable to the indexation. Should we expect the same effect in H2, or maybe will indexation be neutral? And on top of this, a +1.9% mixed effect is a very remarkable achievement. Would you see these results as repeatable in H2? And should we still expect some price mix that drop through overall in the region of 55% in the H2? Thank you very much. Thank you. So on the dealers inventory, of course it varies, but in a nutshell, we see in terms of passenger car, we see the stocks at the norms across all the regions. In winter, we have seen additional sales in the beginning of first semester, as we started the year with a very low inventory in the winter in Europe. So we- Okay. See that. In truck tires, the stocks are at norm all across everywhere. And in mining, we see slow decrease, especially in with some customers that had put some excess inventories. So across what we see is a slight decrease. In terms of- Mm-hmm. Pricing for Q2, then I would do just a remark on this. We receive conflicting inputs from the market authorities that tell us that we need to disclose as much, answer as much questions that are asked on this. And the European Commission that tells us we should not basically disclose any type, this kind of information. So I can only be, and we, even I, can only be very vague on this. Mm-hmm. And said, we have not changed, and we expect overall, second semester comparable to what we have done in the first semester, but we cannot comment further. And that is true for any every question on this, we will just repeat this statement. And maybe for the remaining question on the mix- To complete on the price, on the Q2, the negative pricing is entirely attributable to the indexation. Yeah, yeah. No other effect. Regarding the mix, yeah, we are expecting a mix which will be maybe even better, because we, we think that the market mix between replacement and original equipment (OE) will be more favorable in the H2, as we are seeing OE market deteriorating. Mm-hmm. We should globally probably compensate the volume effect that are linked to this market deterioration on the original equipment (OE). Well, thank- There are plenty of mix, huh? We have product mix, segment mix, geographic mix, OE/RT mix, many different mixes, but we expect things to be steady. Okay, thank you, very clear. If I may, taking pricing comparable to the H1, and maybe a better mix in the H2, should we still expect a price drop through on price mix at 55%, or maybe it could be, could be half, be higher? Yeah. Monica, the price effect, the drop-through for price is 100%. The drop-through for mix, if you look on the H1, is around 70%. Yeah. Historically, it has moved between 50%-70%. Okay. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, very clear. Thank you. Next question? The next question is from Michael Jacks, Bank of America. Hi, good evening. Thank you for taking my questions as well. Firstly, what was the contribution from logistics in the manufacturing and logistics tailwind that was realized in the H1? And now that you have concluded your annual shipping negotiations, can you give us some guidance on your expectations for transport costs for H2 and into the H1 of 25? That's my first question. And I'll, I'll stop there and ask my second question afterwards, if that's okay. Yeah. So we don't disclose that detailed information, but, of course, we had. But I can tell you that, we have a positive maritime logistics, maritime freight, cost input, and we think that, will remain, as we have plenty of, contract renegotiation that have been, signed. And, so we are confident in our ability to enjoy this, renegotiated, maritime freight. And maybe what we can add is that at the beginning of the year, we are concerned about the potential effect of the Red Sea crisis. In fact, it has not led to inflationary costs related to the shipping. That, that's helpful, thank you. And then my second question on the SR, SR3 segment, it seems like the drop-through rate there was particularly high. I know you don't disclose that separately, but could you perhaps just provide a little bit more analysis on that? Is that comment fair, and what are your expectations there for H2? And then I have one more question, if I may. Yes. Well, SR2 has been high, SR3, sorry, not SR2. SR3. SR4 or SR3? SR3. SR3. SR3. SR3. SR3, yeah. Yeah, SR3 has been high, but mostly because we have seen, as I mentioned, original equipment (OE) market, particularly for construction, material handling, and agriculture. Some very big OEMs are announcing restructuring and very sharp volume drop, have announced sharp volume drop during the H1. And it has its market where in each market is different, but on average, you can consider that in this kind of market, OE weight is around 40%-50% of the market, when replacement is around between 50%-60%. So, that's a segment where the volume impact is important, which lead to this higher drop-off. Thank you. And then my final question, are you observing any other market distortions or impacts from the import of budget tires? Is there any trading down that's become visible? And do you worry yet that the price gaps between premium and budget segments is getting too wide? So on the price, I will restate what I've just said. We will not comment further because up until we have a clear understanding of what the market regulators expect versus what the European Commission expects. On the trading, the market distortions, we see that happening, especially in emerging countries, South America, Africa, and Middle East, Southeast Asia, where there it's a very significant. Now, does it change the landscape? It structurally not because we think it's just an influx of an inventory buildup. We don't anticipate structural market distortions linked to that. And one part of the market distortion, for example, for truck tire, we have seen imports growing by 90% in the US Yes. Imports from Thailand, because there is already tariffs between China and US for truck tires. And rumors of potential implementation of tariffs for tires coming from Thailand and Southeast Asia has led to an inflow, which is completely artificial. 90% is never seen? Yeah. This inflow will be absorbed by the sell-out probably in the next 6-12 months. This inventory buildup will fade down in the second semester, and it will, it will take some time to be purged. Yeah, that's helpful color. Thank you very much. The next question, gentlemen, is from Jose Asumendi of JP Morgan. Thank you very much. Two questions, please. If you could please help us a little bit with the profit bridge expectations across the three categories, raw mats, manufacturing, logistics, and SG&A. Directionally, how do we think about them into the H2 of the year? And second, can you help us a bit with your restructuring cash outflows in 2024 and maybe 2025, which should reflect on the work you're doing to improve the capacity and the loading of your plants in Europe? Thank you very much. I will start with the first part of your question. All for the H2, raw materials should be slightly unfavorable, as we have seen already, slight increase in natural rubber and the anticipation of the implementation of EUDR, which is the European Union Deforestation Regulation, that will lead to all the tire manufacturer are going to buy a natural rubber to pay a slight premium to get this certification. Logistics will be favorable, partly the sea freight. And overall for the year, we consider that energy will be favorable. The only element which will remain unfavorable is the labor cost, both in, let's say, the cost of goods sold and SG&A. Regarding the effect of restructuring in our free cash flow, in fact, overall, we consider that we should have around between EUR 200 million and EUR 250 million for the full year of cash outflows for the restructuring that has been announced. So that- Thank you so much. In line with what we have announced during the previous call. ... Indeed. Mm-hmm. Thank you very much. Thank you. Thank you, Jose. The next question is from Martino De Ambroggi of Equita SIM. Thank you very much, and good evening, everybody. The first question is on mix at group level. I clearly understand it is composed by several different effects, but what is the most important contributor? One question, and am I right in assuming that 18 inches and above was one of the most important contributors, and probably this year can be even higher than the a hundred- significantly higher than the a hundred million that you expect on a yearly basis? This is my first question. Okay, so we, we don't disclose the mix effect by business segment, but what I can tell you is that the mix effect has been positive across the three segments. 'Cause as Florent already mentioned, we have the product mix, we have the geographical mix, for example, particularly favorable for SR2. And we have the brand mix that also is impacting, and the market mix between original equipment (OE) and Replacement. So across all the segment, we are seeing a positive mix. And as far as the mix effect on SR1, I will stick to the figure that I mentioned of roughly EUR 100 million accretion per year on our EBIT, because that's one element of the mix, but not the only one that contribute to our mix improvement. Okay. Thank you, Yves. And the second is on truck again. Could we consider 10% return on sales is achievable this year, or we need the effects of the actions you already announced, which will be visible next year? Of course, as I mentioned during the presentation, the improvement that you have seen in the H1 does not include any effect from the footprint decision that we took since October last year. So we should have a further improvement in 2025, where we will land exactly in 2024. Honestly, we are already very close to 10%. We should be somewhere probably between 9% and 10%. Okay, thank you. The next question is from Thomas Besson of Kepler. Hello, good evening. I hope you can hear me. Sorry, I'm outside on the cell phone, so I hope you can hear me. Yes. Okay, great. Could you please help us understanding how much of the H1 volume decline is linked with your more selective policy, and how much it may continue to weigh on your relative volumes in the H2 and in 2025 please? Yes. So on this, whether it will continue in H2 and in 2025, yes, there will be a portion of selection that will gradually move, because we are also pacing down in some markets gradually, so we don't make sharp movements with that. Now, in the volume decline, there are market effects and selection policy effects, considered on half, half effect. Okay, thank you very much. The next question is from Sanjay Bhagwani of Citi. Hello, thank you very much for taking my question also. I have two questions left. The first one is coming back on the mix drop-through. Understand H1 has been strong at 70% this time, and I reckon you mentioned normally a range of 60%-70%. So are you able to provide just some color on, because there are several moving variables here, like product mix, segment mix, geo mix, and OE/RT mix. Are you able to provide some color on each of these are, let's say, generally above average to the 60%-70% range and which are below? The reason why I'm asking this question is because it can help us understand how the mix outcome may look in H2, but also it can help us in bringing in some perspective for 2025 and 2026. That's my first question, and I'll just follow up with the next one, if that's okay? Yeah. We'll answer to your first question first, Sanjay. On the H2, we are expecting a drop-through effect, let's say, in the range that I already mentioned, between 50%-70%, knowing that we should have an increased mix effect overall, on the market side. But as we mentioned already, there is, when I say market, is between original equipment (OE) and replacement. But there is also so many different mix effects that we are always, I don't want to give you a precise figure and more range. So we should be not too far from 70% and in the range, let's say, for sure, above 50%, and maybe close to 70%. As far as 2026 target-... I do not have crystal ball, but we are working to win where it matters. Winning where it matters means that we are looking to segment where we can create value for our customers. Our customers are ready, have a willingness to pay for our technology, our lowering resistance performance, and should contribute constantly to our mix improvement over time. As far as the drop-through 2026, I think, as I said, there is so many mix components in the mix that it will be hazardous to give you a precise figure for 2026. What we can say is that in a structural overcapacity market, we think that what we're doing is the only right thing to do strategically. Thank you very much. So maybe we can just assume 60%-70% as it is now? It's your, it's your bet. So, sorry, understood. Yeah. And my second question is on the other line item. And the- so because this other line item has been, you know, one of the key moving variable of the earnings for the last two years. So, keeping in mind that, let's say you meet your free cash flow target, would you see this other line item as a tailwind for full year? Because last year this was, I suppose, a big headwind. And then if you are able to provide some color on the magnitude of how this may look like, assuming you're meeting your free cash flow targets, for example. So, Sanjay, please authorize me to correct what you said. It's not a headwind or a tailwind, it's what the main element in the other line items, other items line, is, the effect of the group bonus that is paid to all group employees during the following year. So we book in advance, of course, the bonus that is going to be paid, linked to the year where we deliver the performance. But the payment is occurring in the spring of the following year. So it's simply the consequence of a value sharing scheme. So when we overperform during one year, we book the provision reserve corresponding to this, to these bonuses. When we underperform, it has a positive effect on the year, EBIT. Thank you. The next question. The last question, sir, is from Michael Aspinall of Jefferies. Thanks. Good day, and good evening from me. Just two quick ones. You mentioned tariffs may be coming for North America in September. Can you just talk to what effect you think that's gonna have on the market in 2025, once that, additional inventory is digested? We have already seen some effect, but Yves described about situation related to Thailand, and the tariffs were different from what was anticipated, which led to huge selling in there. So there now, the tariffs are lower than anticipated, so we think this excess inventory will take time to be purchased in the market now. What is the speed? We don't know yet. Okay, and then just one more from me. I'm interested in your acquisition pipeline. I'm assuming you have both, public and private companies in the pipeline. Are you still seeing attractive public-listed targets in the current market, or have you seen private targets become more attractive, relative to public, given equity markets? What we still see in the market is that there are very high price expectations in M&A, whether it's public or private. And of course we are following our strategy, but we won't do stupid things. Exactly what we said during our Capital Markets Day. Okay. You're seeing high price expectations still in private markets as well? So far, yes. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. So I think we have, It was the last question. Yeah, we have finished all the questions. So thank you very much for your attendance and, it's a renewed pleasure to present our results. And, so we will see you in a few months from now. Thank you very much. Thank you very much. Bye-bye. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's Michelin conference call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect.