Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us at short notice following our announcement of the acquisition of Evelyn Partners. I'm here with Katie. I'll start with a short introduction before we take your questions. With the GBP 2.7 billion acquisition of Evelyn Partners, we are creating the U.K.'s leading private banking and wealth manager. This accelerates delivery of the group's strategy by increasing our exposure to a highly attractive, growing market, supported by strong demographic, regulatory, and technology trends. Evelyn Partners is a market-leading financial planning and investment management firm. It has a 180-year heritage, a high-quality, loyal client base, and is a strong cultural fit. It brings a large regional network of 21 offices, employing 270 financial planners, 325 specialist investment managers, and a highly regarded direct-to-consumer investment platform, Besti nvest, and it has a strong track record of profitable growth. In 2025, it delivered income of GBP 509 million, with EBITDA of GBP 179 million at a margin of 35%, and it attracted net new inflows of GBP 1.6 billion. So we see this as a business with strong prospects for future growth. Combining Evelyn Partners with our private banking and wealth management business allows us to scale and broaden our financial planning, savings, and investment capabilities and extend an enhanced offering to customers across the group. Evelyn Partners' GBP 69 billion in assets under management and administration, combined with NatWest Group's GBP 59 billion, brings total AUMA of GBP 127 billion and total customer assets and liabilities for the combined business to GBP 188 billion. This amounts to 20% of the group's total customer assets and liabilities, making private banking and wealth management a scaled growth engine to the group. The transaction will also boost fee income by around 20% before synergies, making non-interest income a larger and growing proportion of our revenues. We see a significant opportunity for value creation. We expect to realize around GBP 100 million of cost synergies by removing duplication in shared services and technology applications, where there is high alignment between our platforms, as well as efficiencies of scale. The cost to achieve, of approximately GBP 150 million, will be phased over three years. Revenue synergies include bringing Evelyn Partners' broad range of financial planning and wealth management solutions to all our customers, enhancing our D2C investment offering via Bestinvest, leveraging Evelyn Partners' technology for portfolio management solutions, and providing Evelyn Partners customers with our full range of banking solutions and combined wealth management offering. We have a strong record of execution and successful integration. We have tracked this business for a long time to get conviction on cultural alignment and how to execute, and we are very encouraged by what we have seen. This is a relationship business, and our approach will be client-led. We are clear-eyed on the risks and confident on our ability to deliver. So there is strong strategic rationale for the combination. It is operationally deliverable, and financially, it's a compelling use of capital. Let me take you through the financial headlines. We are acquiring Evelyn Partners for GBP 2.7 billion in cash, an implied EV to EBITDA multiple of less than 10x, including run rate cost synergies. We have outlined cost synergies of GBP 100 million, equivalent to around 10% of the combined cost base, with cost to achieve of approximately GBP 150 million. We are also confident in our ability to deliver significant revenue synergies. The transaction will be accretive to growth for the group. It is also expected to be accretive to group return on tangible equity in year one, and to deliver returns above those generated through share buybacks. We expect the transaction to reduce our CET1 ratio by around 130 basis points, and we remain well capitalized. We have a strong track record of capital generation, and the transaction will strengthen this further. We are also announcing a share buyback of GBP 750 million today, showing both our confidence in the outlook, as well as our ongoing commitment to return surplus capital to shareholders at the earliest opportunity. Our dividend payout ratio of around 50% remains unchanged. We will continue to review capital distribution and currently expect to make our next share buyback announcement at our first half results in 2027. The transaction is expected to complete in the summer, subject to the customary reg approvals. Thank you. Matt, we'll open it up for questions now. We'll now take questions. If you'd like to ask a question today, then please do so by using the Raise Hand function on the Zoom app. If you're dialing in by phone, you can press star nine to raise your hand and star six to unmute once prompted. Our first question comes from Alvaro Serrano from Morgan Stanley. Alvaro, please go ahead and ask your question. Hey, Alvaro. Are you there? Alvaro, please go ahead and ask your question. I think we have a problem with Alvaro, so I'm going to move on to Benjamin Caven-Roberts. If you'd like to go ahead and ask your question, please. Ben? Morning. Thank you very much for the- Ah. -presentation and for taking the questions. So I just wanted to ask two, please. So first, you mentioned the deal is expected to deliver returns greater than generated through a share buyback. Could you please just run me through how you're thinking about that calculation? Effectively, if you're comparing the GBP 2.7 billion being invested, and then looking at the EBITDA figure of GBP 179 million, adding the GBP 100 million of run rate cost synergies, and then assuming some revenue synergy, effectively to get a profit figure which is a return higher than your own earnings yield. And then just as a follow-up to that, could you run through in a bit more detail some of the revenue synergies you're thinking about, and which areas you actually think are most tangible over the next 12-24 months? Thank you very much. Thanks, Ben. Appreciate. Good to hear you, and thank you. Katie, why don't you talk about the return and versus buyback, and then I'll talk about the revenue synergies. Sure. Thanks very much. Morning, Ben. So as you look at the return in terms of the buyback, we've given you the numbers today based on a three-year outlook. So when you think of our targets that we'll talk more about on Friday, they will include everything in relation to Evelyn and the benefit of the transaction within there. I mean, Ben, if you were to run the buyback today, I think you and I would both get to a return number that's around the kind of 11% number. And if you then take the Evelyn and take it out to 2028, when will it be expected to see the synergies, the cost synergies delivered, that GBP 100 million, plus the cost to achieve GBP 150 million, delivered as well along that. You're obviously, within terms of the EBITDA, you can see the income that they're bringing in from their 2025 numbers, and we additionally expect to continue to grow that. So when you pull all of those things together, we're very comfortable with that in kind of 2028 run rate, that will be a level that is comfortably above the share buyback transaction. Thanks, Katie. Then, Ben, on the revenue synergies, I'd start by saying we do see revenue synergies as a meaningful opportunity. There's probably two broad strands to the synergies. The first is bringing Evelyn's financial planning and investment capabilities to our customer base, not just within our wealth business, but more broadly within our retail and C&I business. So, for example, servicing the Bestinvest direct-to-consumer platform, you know, to around GBP 19 billion of our customers, extending market-leading financial planning capability from Evelyn to our affluent and premier segment. So they're the... I guess that's the first strand. So significant opportunity from the leading capabilities that Evelyn has to the customers of the group. And then the second opportunity, or the second strand to the opportunity, is really supporting Evelyn's clients with the banking solutions that the group has, be they Coutts or NatWest. So it's the combination of those capabilities to the clients of each each brand and each institution. So hopefully that gives you a flavor of it. Thanks, Ben. Thank you. We're going to try and go back to Alvaro Serrano from Morgan Stanley. Alvaro, please go ahead and ask your question. Hopefully, I've now managed. Can you hear me now? Second time lucky, Alvaro, we have you, yeah? Great. Morning, Alvaro. Thanks. Thanks. That says a lot of about me. Thanks very much for taking my questions. Good morning to both of you. Look, it's more a follow-up from Ben's question. Can you talk us through maybe some of the sort of when I compare it to share buybacks, I struggle to get it numbers to be better, which I suspect may have to do with the revenue growth beyond the synergies that you're you think this business can achieve. So can you talk us through maybe what's a reasonable sort of revenue growth based on what you've seen historically from them? You pointed out the market growth, but maybe something like that, so some what you think is a reasonable prospect. Also, when you look at the client profile of your existing wealth clients versus what you're bringing on, can you give us a bit of color on what the differences and similarities of this client base versus what you have at the moment? Thank you. You go on the buyback. You can highlight if I miss anything. Yeah. So as you kind of look at it, I mean, I kind of, I'm clearly not going to be terribly precise on this, otherwise, I'd have given you the number this morning already. But just to kind of help you kind of work your way through on it. I mean, if you look at their kind of income number that they had, just over GBP 500 million in 2025, we know that they've had strong growth, 7% CAGR in AUM over that period. You know, we're looking to bring in our synergies run rate by kind of 2028, and at that point, we kind of get real comfort that actually it is better than the return of that kind of around 11% that we would kind of talk about in terms of the share buyback piece. So overall, you know, we are very comfortable. Once you bring in those revenue synergies, the cost synergies, which we've clearly given you this morning, are all fully bedded in. That actually, there's not no concern around the strength of that return. Great. And then, Alvaro, on your second question, which my interpretation was kind of the similarities or otherwise of the client base. So a couple of broader points. Evelyn, as I said in my opening comments, we've been monitoring the business for a while. Evelyn's made significant investments in the business over the last couple of years. That's actually across multiple strands of the business, the technology platform, the advisor network, training and capability, and also the brand. The client base of the business, we spent a lot of time with in respect to due diligence. It's a high-value client base. It's a very loyal client base. I think probably the best way, given you know us, Alvaro, the best way to think about it is the client base segments well to both, or parts of the client base segment well to, to both our Coutts business, but also our premier and affluent business. That's probably the best way to think of it. So high value, high loyalty, and segments really nicely with our, with our premier, affluent, and Coutts client base. Thanks, Alvaro. Thank you. Our next question comes from Sheel Shah of JP Morgan. Please go ahead. Great. Thanks, guys. Just a question around amortization costs, because I don't see any note of that in the press release or the presentation. Looking at Evelyn Partners in the 2014 report, that was running at around GBP 110 million per year. So I just wanted to get a handle on where you think amortization costs are going to be for the next few years, and whether you've then marked up the value of the customer lists associated with Evelyn. Thanks. Yeah, sure. Thanks. Thanks very much, Sheel. So as you look at a transaction like this, obviously it's gonna be subject to standard kind of purchase accounting and treatment as we bring both tangible and intangible assets on board. So you will see the amortization. It will obviously cause an increase for the group overall as we start to bring them in, and we'll give you more guidance on Friday in terms of that cost outlook. One thing I would remind you about, though, of course, is as we deal with goodwill and intangibles and all the amortization, it's a statutory book result, not... it's capital neutral. So the way to think about it is this 130 basis points impact on capital for the group, and you know our strong kind of capital generation as that kind of comes through. So I just kind of remind you about that, that accretion that comes through as a result of the strong addition of fee income that we'll see coming through into the results as we increase the group fee income by about 20%. Thanks, Sheel. Thanks, Katie. Our next question comes from Andrew Coombs of Citigroup. Andrew, please unmute and ask your question. Yeah, morning. So a couple. Firstly, just on the 130 basis points, I assume the bulk of that is due to the goodwill that's recognized, but perhaps you can talk us through the moving parts on the 130 basis points charge and just confirm if that includes the GBP 100 million for the CTA, or if that's then gonna be on top of the 130 basis points. And then secondly, can you just talk about the additional capabilities that it adds? Clearly, it gives you a whole new client base, for cross-sell, but in terms of the capabilities, the products, the services, what does Evelyn have that you don't have? Thank you. Do you want to take the first and I'll take the second, Katie? Yeah, sure. Absolutely. So as you look at that kind of 130 basis points, as you can imagine, it's built up for me kind of from four sort of things. You've got a little bit of kind of P&L impact, but goodwill, you're absolutely right, that's the main component of it. You'll then have the other intangibles that we'll recognize. There'll be a little bit of RWA just because of kind of op risk that will kind of come through. I'm not gonna give you the detailed breakdown of all of those different things. But when you run that through in your full year 2026 capital position, it does work out to be 130 basis points impact. Oh, great. Thank you. And then, Andrew, on the capabilities, as you say, the client base, I'd probably list four additional capabilities that's worth bearing in mind. The first is financial planning. So Evelyn has the largest employed advisor base in the U.K., so significant increase in the scale of our financial planning capability, and obviously, we can bring that to the clients of the group. Second is the direct-to-consumer platform, which branded Bestinvest. So that's a clear enhancement to our own D2C platform. Third, over 300 investment managers, so significant skills, expertise, investment managers, long history, many years of good investment and financial advice. And then fourthly, slightly differently, we'll be able to leverage some of the great technology platforms that Evelyn has. Xplan would be one example, so that they will either replace or enhance the wealth management and financial planning platforms that we have. So quite a broad range of capabilities, which combined with what we already have with the group, gives us the confidence that this will be a leading private bank and wealth manager. Thanks, Andrew. Our next question comes from, Aman Rakkar of Barclays. Aman, please unmute and go ahead. Morning, Aman. Hi, guys. Yes, good morning, both. Morning. So I had one follow-up question and then one separate one. Just on the, I struggle a bit with EBITDA in banks land. Is there any chance you could just kinda confirm what the kinda net profit contribution of Evelyn in 2025 would have been to NatWest, including or, you know, ideally including the depreciation charge? I just wanna kinda get a clean read on a kinda price to earnings multiple here. I think it's just a kind of way of appraising this deal that I find a bit easier to make sense of. So what's the net kinda net profit attributable profit contribution of Evelyn 2025 as our starting base? The second is just around costs. So could you kinda lift the lid a little bit on exactly what you're looking to do on the GBP 100 million cost saves, where it's coming from, and specifically, whether you've kind of assumed anything around the need to pay any retainers to some of the Evelyn staff. And have you made an assumption around attrition? Is there any kind of overlap in the customer bases here, please? Thank you so much. Okay. I'll take the second, Katie, and you take the first. Should I kick off? You kick off. Perfect. Lovely. That's great. So the way I kind of think about it, Aman, is it's a little bit like PBT. You know, there are some parameter differences, so I'm not gonna give you the detail. But I mean, you can see from their accounts that their EBITDA in 2025 was GBP 179. We will give you more detail on closing, exactly what it will do for 2026. I mean, we talk about closing in the summer. It's clearly subject to some regulatory approval, so the exact date, it will obviously depend upon that. But I would say it's kind of immaterial for 2026 earnings. What I do think we need to think about, though, is you do see this growing contribution in 2027 and then into 2028, and clearly, if you were to look at the IRR of this business, you would see that it would continue to grow beyond there as we continue to get the real benefit of synergies, the revenue synergies coming through. And obviously, it's a portion of the bank that you would value slightly differently because of its capital-like nature, as it kind of comes into your kind of sum of the parts models. So overall, very, very comfortable that it's gonna be a real positive contributor to the group, both by 2028 and importantly beyond. Paul? Thank you, Katie. Hey, Aman. So, I'll treat the... I guess there's two questions or two points: cost and people. On costs and synergies, yeah, GBP 100 million, as you say. To put that in context, that's 10% of the combined private bank and wealth management cost base, so we feel high conviction and high confidence on that. In terms of some of the key drivers, probably the primary one is technology consolidation and platform consolidation. Both businesses use common platforms, Avaloq and Aladdin, for example, so that's a big driver. Secondly, as you'd expect, there's opportunities to deduplicate things like functions, licenses. There's a whole host of shared services as well, optimize things like marketing spend. So during the process of due diligence, you know, we've got a very detailed bottom-up plan on cost, on the cost synergies. Hopefully, you know, what we've demonstrated over the course of the last couple of years and the transactions we've executed on is we deliver on the synergies that we promise. I think we've got a good track record there. So we feel good about the opportunity around synergies, and we feel good about our ability to execute them. On people, you know me, I'm very thoughtful and systematic. This is a people and relationship business. We've been impressed with the Evelyn management team and the Evelyn colleagues, so we've been very thoughtful in how to approach that. As is the nature of these transactions, we thought very deeply about ensuring we retain the right people and capabilities, so you can assume that's very well thought through and baked into our, into our plan. And then you also asked about attrition. Again, that's baked into the financials that we have shared today. There's a whole host of precedent transactions and, you know, and where you can take some assumptions. And obviously, to the extent we can, we've looked at the kind of crossover between the client bases. But that's all baked into the financials that we've shared with you today and the opportunity we see to increase ROTE and deliver additional returns. Thanks, Aman. Our next question comes from Jonathan Pierce of Jefferies. Jonathan, please unmute and go ahead. Yeah, good morning. Jonathan. Hi, can you hear me? Yeah, we got you. Hello there. I've got two questions. Sorry, I'm gonna come back on this point on amortization charges. So just to clarify that when you talk about the returns being better than the buybacks, you, you are presumably excluding those amortization charges. I mean, I think people are asking about this 'cause they were quite big last year, about GBP 90 million, and this is a business that has driven some of its growth in recent years, small bolt-on acquisitions, creating those customer list intangibles. So it's not entirely clear why one would ignore those amortization charges moving forwards. And then, of course, some of that amortization charge is also software, which is just the P&L component of, you know, what's what you're spending to the balance sheet. So why are we ignoring that? And can I just check that you are ignoring that on your ROI comments relative to buybacks? The second question, I guess to some extent, thinking forward to Friday, that the tangible equity in this business, about GBP 200 million, if you can confirm that. So I suppose there's about an 8% hit to the TNAV, pro forma, which all else equal, is gonna lift the ROTE by about 1.5 percentage points versus what one might have thought would be the case standalone. But presumably, when you talk to us on Friday about longer-term ROTE targets, that number is going to be 1.5 percentage points higher than whatever you may have thought pre this acquisition. So they're the two questions. Thank you. Sure. Thanks so much, and good morning, Jonathan. I guess, first of all, what you say is we do include the amortization in our returns. You know, as a management team, Paul and I have always been really keen on making sure that we give you full numbers, and we don't do lots of X this or X that, so they're definitively kind of included in there. What we're trying to guide you to in terms of the return is when you look at it, with their numbers, our delivery of our run rate synergies, the cost of delivering those synergies, by end of 2023, they were comfortable with that return. When we go beyond there, and you kind of look at the IRR with the fully loaded price, that comfort obviously increases. You know, and I know, Jonathan, you're gonna be thinking both statutory and kind of CET1, so you're very familiar that the amortization doesn't affect that capital distribution capacity. As we look at the CET1, and we know that will be clear. So obviously the amortization for the CET1, we don't look at 'cause it's not relevant, but for the statutory basis, it will be. So it's all part of that kind of technical accounting. We will give you the statutory EPS, and we'll continue to do so. You know, and certainly when we look at our 2028 guidance that we'll do on Friday, I'm not gonna be drawn today on what that might be. We'll save that for Friday, if you don't mind. But what we will confirm is these numbers will be reflected within that guidance for 2028. As I said earlier on the call, for 2026, they're really not material, and given that you don't know exactly the date that they will settle on, the 2026 will be ex Evelyn. But as we know those dates and we know where we are, we'll update you as we progress through the year as we would expect to do. Thanks, Jonathan. Thank you. Thanks, Jonathan. Do we have any more, Matt? Yes, we have Christopher Cant from Autonomous. Please go ahead. Hey, Chris, you there? We seem to be having some issues with Christopher, so we'll move over to Benjamin Toms of RBC. Benjamin, please go ahead and ask your question. Morning, both. Thanks for taking my question. Just the one, please. The question is, are you now done on chunky M&A, or are there other parts of the business which you think might need bolstering into the medium term, or is this one big gap? I think, I think you noted that the return on the buyback is 11%, so potentially there's quite a lot of stuff out there which would pass the initial sniff test of beating the return on a, on a buyback. Thank you. Thanks, Ben. I'll take that. So obviously, our immediate focus is on the successful integration of Evelyn and making sure we deliver on the potential and value of that transaction. We also, and we'll talk more about it on Friday, have you know ambitious organic plans for our three businesses, so that's also an additional focus. In Wealth, obviously, the market remains pretty fragmented and scale matters, so you know, I'll continue to be disciplined, but if there are value accretive opportunities aligned with strategy, you know, we'll put our usual kind of cold lens over it. But as you say, you know, the near-term focus is gonna be on the successful integration of Evelyn and delivering the organic plan across the three businesses. Thanks. We will try again to go to Christopher Cant of Autonomous. Christopher, if you'd like to go ahead and ask your question, please. Good morning. Can you hear me okay? Yeah, we got you now. Yeah. Hey, Chris. Okay, grand. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Could I ask a couple of points of detail, please? On the 130 basis points, is that including the cost to achieve? What tax rate do you think attaches to this business? Should we be assuming the bank tax surcharge applies? And then in terms of the sort of Cap Gen piece, I guess a variant on Aman's question in a way, what do you think the payback period is for the capital that you're deploying into the transaction? I appreciate that the amortization and that's a non-capital item. I get it. I also sort of struggle a little bit with EBITDA in banking contexts, but in terms of the capital you're investing, what do you think the payback period is? Thank you. Great, Katie? Yeah. Yeah. Sure, thanks very much. So, if we look at it, we're- 130, Yeah, hundred- Yeah. Looking at the 130 basis points, you know, that's using the GBP 2.7 billion of the CET1 capital, and also I mentioned earlier, there's a little bit extra in terms of some op risk there. You know, clearly, the kind of payback is a function of the growth and the execution, but we're working very much for a three-year return. And it includes all of the costs to achieve associated with that day one, and anything that's incurred in 2026 as we go through that. We'll give you more disclosure in terms of all of those numbers, as I said, I said earlier, once we've kind of got them nailed down on 2026 and beyond, but we're very comfortable that this is a, this is a good use of, of capital. Thanks, Chris. Our next question is from Ed Firth of KBW. Ed, please unmute and go ahead. Yeah, morning, everybody. Thanks so much for taking the questions. Morning, Ed. Um, yeah- Morning. I guess for me, the only question... I'm just trying to understand the logic of announcing the GBP 750 million buyback today and then nothing until mid-2027. So, I mean, are we assuming by that, therefore, that in the summer, when you do this deal, you will be well below your capital limit, and you'll then take a year to build back up to it or build up to a level where you can be sufficiently above whatever your minimum is, which I guess at the moment is slightly open, some uncertainty in the market, if not in your own minds. So I suppose the question is: How should we think about that? Are we gonna go below the level, and then you're gonna take time to build up? Why are you announcing a GBP 750 today? Why aren't you waiting until you've got the capital and then just continue the buyback program as normal from sort of second half next year onwards? Thanks so much. Thanks, Ed. Katie, yeah, go for it. Yeah. Thanks, Ed. Thanks very much. So as we look at it, I think you need to kind of take a step back and think of where we are on capital. So we're at Q3, we're at 14.2%. You know, we know that this transaction won't complete until the middle of the year. You know, sometime in summer, you can take your views of when that might be, and obviously dependent upon timing. We know also that we're strongly capital generative. If you look at the capital that we generated in the first nine months of last year, we can see that we'd be there. So this is not a question of taking ourselves way below our capital number. We've always talked about, you know, operating within the kind of the tramline. So very comfortable in terms of the level of capital generated, comfortable that this is a good transaction. We'll talk more about the earnings and capital framework on Friday as we go through from there, but this isn't a question of kind of pulling down. As we looked at capital, we looked at the transaction, we're confident on our level. You know, we've been very clear that we'd return surplus capital to our shareholders at the earliest opportunity, and that's simply what this GBP 750 million represents in terms of that. Sorry, just I have one question I'm gonna go back to on Chris. Chris, you asked me the tax rate. I didn't tell you. Forgive me, it's 24% that you'll be using for this business, so you can pop that in as well. Sorry to have missed that off last time. Good catch. Thank you, Katie. Thank you, Ed. We have no further questions, so I'll now hand back to Paul for closing remarks. Okay. Thank you, Matt, and thank you everyone for joining at short notice on a Monday morning. We appreciate the questions, and we will see you again on Friday. Have a good week. Thanks, guys.