Good evening, everyone. This is Ronak Mehta. On behalf of JM Financial Institutional Securities, I welcome you all to 2Q FY25 earnings call of Apollo Tyres. We have with us today Mr. Neeraj Kanwar, Managing Director and Vice Chairman of Apollo Tyres, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Chief Financial Officer, and IR team. So, as we do always, we'll start the call with a brief opening remarks from the management, followed by a Q&A session. With that, over to you, Mr. Neeraj. Thank you. Thank you, Ronak. Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. I welcome you all to the Apollo Tyres Q2 FY25 post-results call, and as always, I would start with a broad overview of the results, followed by some of the key initiatives, and then pass on the floor to Gaurav for more detailed commentary on our financial performance, and then we would be happy to take questions post Gaurav's remarks. Q2 tends to be a seasonal weak quarter in India. Given that backdrop, Q2 FY25 was a challenging quarter, marked by a steep increase in RM cost. Consolidated operating margin for the quarter stood at 13.6%, down about 70 basis points sequentially, mainly on account of RM cost pressures. We are cognizant of the growth challenges in the marketplace and are taking initiatives to drive top-line growth while maintaining a strong focus on profitability, cash flow generation, and return ratios. On the positive side, we are witnessing a reduced steepness in RM inflation. This, coupled with pricing actions, should help us report better operating performance going forward after the quarter. Coming to regional performance, I'm happy to share that despite the challenging environment, we outgrew industry in domestic passenger car tires, in commercial vehicles, and agri replacement segments, resulting in market share gains across key product categories in the quarter. However, the growth was negated by a decline in the OEM segment, impacted by weak industry growth, and our continued focus on profitability. The only exception in the OE segment was agri, where we reported strong double-digit growth in volumes. On the positive side, we initiated price increases across categories in the domestic replacement segment. Coming to Europe, the market is rebounding, indicating a start of recovery. We once again registered improvement in PCR mix. Ultra-high performance segment accounted for about 47% of PCR volumes in Q2 of FY25, compared to 39% in the same quarter last year. In terms of outlook, we expect recovery in operating performance driven by growth in European operations. Coming to India, while we foresee improvement in replacement demand momentum, OE demand is expected to remain muted in the near term. On the positive side, we have proactively taken pricing actions in the quarter and remain committed to further price increases to pass on the raw material inflation. Let me now talk about the key pillars of our Vision 26. Starting with R&D, I'm pleased to share that both in India and Europe, we have secured additional model wins from marquee German PV manufacturers, thereby revalidating our product capabilities and further supporting our premiumization journey. I'm also happy to share that we continue to win podium positions in the European test results. Coming to digitalization, we are leveraging new-age technology to further improve our process. We have recently gone live with end-to-end supply chain digitization in India. This would help us improve our demand-supply planning, product availability, and further optimizing our inventory. Finally, sustainability has always been a key pillar for us. I'm happy to share that their work is being recognized by external agencies. During my last call, I touched upon significant improvement in our sustainability ratings by one of the premier agencies, EcoVadis. Furthermore, recently, BW Sustainability World ranked Apollo Tyres 14th overall among India's most sustainable companies. Apollo Tyres was also ranked the top sustainable company in the automotive component segment. With this, I'd like to conclude my opening remarks, and let me reiterate that, as always, we are keeping a close watch on the markets and our costs. At Apollo Tyres, we are working to prepare for what lies ahead, and I believe we are extremely well placed to leverage long-term opportunities across our key markets. Thank you for being on this call, and I hand over to Gaurav. Thank you. Thank you, Neeraj, and good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. Continuing from where Neeraj left, let me share further details of our operations for the last quarter. The consolidated revenue for the quarter stood at INR 64.4 billion, a growth of 3% over the same quarter last year. The consolidated EBITDA for the quarter stood at INR 8.8 billion, a margin of 13.6% compared to 14.4% in the last quarter on account of the raw material cost pressure. Coming to the balance sheet, we saw about INR 4.6 billion increase in net debt as of September 2024 when compared to the beginning of the year, April 2024. The increase in net debt was driven by an increase in short-term borrowings, which was used to finance inventories and is only a short-term phenomenon. We continue to bring down the long-term debt, which has reduced by INR 7.6 billion at September end compared to the March 2024 position. The net debt-to-EBITDA for the consolidated operations was a very comfortable 0.8x as of September end. For the India operations, we continue to grow in the core replacement segment of TBR and PCR. In both these subsegments, we are growing at a healthy volume growth rate. We also witnessed good growth in the agri segment. Our recovery in export volume continues. However, there was negative growth in the OE segment for truck and PCR. The revenue for the quarter was INR 44.6 billion, marginal growth over the same quarter last year. The EBITDA for the quarter stood at INR 5.4 billion, a margin of 12.1% compared to 13.8% in the last quarter. In terms of demand outlook, we expect the demand momentum to get better in H2. We expect the RM cost to slightly increase in Q3 and then start coming down from Q4 onwards. As Neeraj indicated earlier, we've taken price increases in the domestic replacement segment, and we will continue to navigate the RM cost push through well-timed price increases. The net debt-to-EBITDA for India operations stood at 1.1x as of September end. Coming to the European operations, the revenue for the quarter was €171 million, slightly up compared to the same period last year, but 17% up sequentially. The EBITDA for the quarter stood at €25 million, with an EBITDA margin of 14.8% compared to 14.1% for the same period last year and 13.7% for the last quarter. We continue to grow vis-à-vis the market with a very strong mix in the PCLT segment. As Neeraj indicated, the Europe market is showing good signs of demand recovery, and we expect to gain from the same. We will continue to focus on cost optimization, further driving up the margins in those operations. There is no change in our CapEx guidance for FY25, and we will continue to focus on profitability, free cash flow generation, and improvement in the return ratios as we go ahead. With this, I will conclude my opening remarks. Thank you. We would be happy to take your questions now. Thanks, Gaurav. So we'll start with the question-and-answer session. We have the first question from Raghunandan. Your line must be unmuted now. Can you please go ahead with the question? Thank you, sir, for the opportunity and festive greetings. Sir, firstly, trying to understand better the cost impact, can you indicate that in India, Q2, what was the RM cost increase in Q2? And in Q3, further, how much cost increase do you expect? And if you can also talk about what is the current under-recoveries? Raghu, the RM went up by about 8% sequentially. Our expectation going forward is just about a 1%+ increase for Q3. As per current expectations, the RM should start coming down. What is the kind of price hike you are planning to take, and if you can quantify the under-recovery? So, broadly, we have taken price increase ranging from 2-odd percent in the truck segment to a larger quantum in the PCR segment. The under-recovery from last year is about 6-odd percent. I've got it, sir, and for Q2 for India, if you can share, what was the volume performance YOY, and within that, export, replacement, and OEM, how was it? So, the volume for Q2 Y on Y, Raghu, was flattish. Within that, the replacement was mid-single-digit growth. Exports was a double-digit growth, and OEM was a double-digit negative. Within replacement, how would you see the outlook for full year for TBR and PCR, and also your thoughts on the market share? So, both for TBR and PCR, full year, the replacement should be around a double-digit growth. Right now, in near term, the signs of recovery from OE are not there. So, in near term, it will continue to be probably in the same zone. Your thoughts on the market share, sir? Market share in the current year, we've been able to maintain or slightly up across product categories. So, I would tend to think that a similar situation would continue. We would make all attempts to gain the market shares. Thank you, sir. One question, last question on Europe before I fall back to the queue. Outlook for the Europe market, at least as per commentary of some of the global companies, seemed to be flattish. How do you see the recovery panning out? You indicated early signs of recovery, and also there are market share gains for Apollo. So, based on that, how do you see the outlook ahead? And also, in terms of margins, Europe seems to be better placed in terms of margin performance. What has supported the performance? And in your thoughts on how the product mix and cost-saving efforts can help the margins ahead? Raghu, the EU market, which is for the first half, has shown a growth of about 3% on the passenger car segment, which is the key segment for us. We've also grown in line with that slightly ahead. The reason on the margin performance is that a large part of the raw material cost push was driven by natural rubber, which is a much smaller proportion for the European operations versus the Indian operations. That's the nature of the industry in terms of predominance of car tires versus the truck tires. That's obviously helped the European operations. Also for the Western mature markets, raw material proportion as a cost is much lower than for markets like India. All that has played into margin support. Lastly, the point that Neeraj mentioned, we've been able to successfully keep improving our mix with a significant improvement on the UHP proportion, which has further helped the margins despite the other pressures. Thank you very much, sir. Very helpful. Thank you, Raghu. Thank you. We have the next question from Siddharth Bera. Please go ahead. Yeah, hi sir. Thanks for the opportunity. Yes, sir. Sir, first question is on the market share gains, which you alluded to. Is it across both replacement and OE? Because I think last time you said that we had lost some market share in OE. So, are we seeing already improvement in some of those segments where we had initially lost out? Siddharth, I would tend to think that our market shares in OE would be around similar levels. We've started regaining some of the market share on the replacement side. Okay. Any numbers, sir, if you have, and where do we aspire to maybe go to, say, maybe in the next couple of years? We do not have the industry data. These are estimates. On the truck side, our aspirations or vision would be to get back into the 30s in terms of market share, which is where we used to be a couple of years back, and in passenger car, given the more number of players and the more competitive intensity, somewhere in the 20s to early 20s. Got it, sir. Sir, second question is on the cost side. So, in this quarter, in the India business, we saw other cost remaining probably quite steady despite a drop in the volumes. Generally, we do see some improvement there in the second quarter. So, anything to highlight here why it has been so sticky and should we expect more cost increase in the coming quarters, or this is probably the peakish where we should see some improvement going ahead? Siddharth, your observation is absolutely correct. The increase in the other cost is on account of freight costs, where the freight rates went up. Secondly, on account of the EPR, which was not there last year. And thirdly, on account of advertising. The freight rate is very much dependent on how the overall macro environment is. Difficult to predict on that as to where it will go. The advertising portion is under our control. And on the EPR front, that's a constant now. Okay. Okay. Got it. Sir, lastly, on the working capital side, so we have seen quite a steep increase in probably the inventory levels at the end of the quarter. So, do you think a part of this normalizes in the second half? And any color, if you have, now on the CapEx side, also you said that you maintain the ₹10 billion outlook, and we have done only ₹3 billion in the first half. So, where do you think the net debt settles at by the end of the year, if you have some insights there? So, the CAPEX levels would remain. Difficult to give you an estimate on where it would be at the end of the year because that depends on profitability. But it is well under control. There is no major CAPEX coming up. So, from a cash flow perspective or a net debt, there is nothing to worry about. Inventories is a temporary phenomenon. That should get corrected. Also, take into account that for our European business, from a seasonal perspective, there is inventory buildup of winter tires given the coming quarter. Okay, sir. Thanks, Siddharth. Next question is from Amar. Amar, please go ahead. Yeah, hi. Thanks for taking my question. I had two questions. One was maybe a little strategic and long-term. So, we have seen over the last several quarters, the top-line growth has kind of been weaker as compared to some of our peers, whereas prior to that, we were growing much ahead of the competition. So, is that largely due to maybe in the OEMs, our share going down? Or, I mean, how do you explain that? So, yeah, thank you, Amar. I think that's a very valid question. Two things that have gone negative for us is, one, OEs have been, and we have been a very large OE supplier. So, the OEs are down and out. So, obviously, supplies to the OEs have gone down, and there's been a degrowth as far as OE revenue is concerned. Also, export markets, as you know, are weak all over the world, given all the political crises that we are facing. And so, export markets are also down. But if you see replacement in India, where Gaurav has mentioned, we've had a double-digit growth in TBR and PCR. So, we will continue, Amar, to gain market share in our main streamline products, which are truck bus radial and passenger car radial. We'll continue to grow market share and have a double-digit growth. So, when I look at peers, yes, they have gone into the smaller segments of the OEMs where Apollo has come out of. So, you know my mantra has been profitable growth. And therefore, we are only looking at premiumization of our PCR tires and not going down on pricing. So, we are vacating some of these OEM orders on purpose, given the profitability situation. Secondly, also, Apollo has taken the lead in price increases in the market. Given the RM cost push, we have been always taking the lead in RM in price increases. And therefore, the gap between us and competition sometimes weakens our volume growth. So, it's a very fine line of balance between our pricing strategy and our volume strategy. But nevertheless, there is total focus on the main channel of distribution, which is replacement, which gives the maximum profit. Got that. Got that. But as a follow-up to that, even if you look at the kind of margins that we have been delivering, maybe last two or three quarters have been relatively weaker. I understand that RM prices have got a lot to do with that. But if you look at the kind of margins that the peers are delivering, I mean, the difference between you and number three guy has come down quite a bit, right? So, probably something that is not reflecting in the margins. Maybe it has something to do with higher other expenses as well, which you also indicated. So, if you could shed some light on that as well. Sure. Yes, sir. I think that is a focus area for us also. We also believe when we looked at peer profitability, we do see that the gap has narrowed. We are doing more analysis to see what has gone wrong and where other expenses have gone up. So, there is a direct focus on all of this. I can only tell you, going forward, you will see margin improvement over time because quarter three, again, RM is still very, very strong, while rubber has come down. But as you know, it has a three-month lag effect. So, I don't see it springing back in quarter three, but I'm very positive on my volume growth in quarter three. Okay? And that should release some margin. Going forward, if all goes well and RM still keeps coming down, there will be a margin increase in quarter four. But rest assured, we are looking at what you have said, and we are very, very aware of the issue. We will come back to you with better results. That's all I can say. Thanks. Thanks. That's heartening to hear, and maybe a little bit on other expenses, if you can quantify some of these higher other expenses, and when should we see them maybe correcting a little bit, maybe freight costs, advertising, etc.? Gaurav, do you want to come in? Yeah, so, Amar, the advertising part continues at a certain level, and there are no immediate decisions of taking it up or down. The way to look at it is that as the volume growth and some of the normal market growth keeps coming in, the other expenses will not increase in those proportions. And that is what will feed into the margins. So, would the current run rate of about ₹800-odd crores of other expenses, should we build that, be sustained in the near term? Is that the number to? Broadly, yes. All right. Thanks. Thanks so much. Thank you, Amar. All the best. Thanks, Amar. We have the next question from Amin. Please go ahead. Your line is unmuted. Yes. Hi. Hi, Amin. Hi. Hi. Okay. I joined a bit late, so forgive me if I ask some repetitive questions. You mentioned that replacement growth was mid-single digits, but the expectation for the full year is double digit. Is that right? Amin, what was mentioned is that the overall volume growth for the replacement segment was mid-single digits, as you correctly said, and the double-digit reference was specifically for TBR and PCR. Okay. But I'm guessing that would still mean that you are expecting an acceleration of the growth as the year goes by. That's correct. And just in Europe, since we are already in the middle of November, any initial sense that we have got of winter tire demand for this year? As of now, it seems to be a decent quarter. We are growing over last year. Still don't have the figures of the market, but the current sensing is we feel good about the quarter. Okay. Okay. Thank you. And lastly, in Europe, it seems like energy costs have again started to become a bit of a problem. So how are we seeing those things? And I know that you used to hedge, so the impact for you was lesser and with a lag. So how are you seeing those costs pan out in Europe? So, I mean, we've continued with our hedging strategy to a certain extent, and given how the last few years have panned out, in fact, regularly take expert advice and take hedging based on that. So I would say over the next one year, our energy costs would be hedged about to the extent of 60%-70%. Okay. That's good. Thank you. Thank you, Amin. Thank you. We have the next question from Joseph George. Please go ahead. Thank you. Just one question. Gaurav, you mentioned that in truck and bus, we've taken a 2% price increase, and the highest that you have taken in PCR is much higher. I want to understand how much of this is reflected in the Q2 results and how much of it is yet to come, which means that it will come in the third quarter, assuming you don't take any further price increases. Joseph, the line was slightly unclear, but I understood that, how much of the price increase is already reflected. On the truck side, we've taken about half of the price increase of the 2% in the current quarter, which will flow through. On the passenger car side, a larger chunk, about 3%, has been taken in the current quarter, which would only have reflected partially in the current quarter. Sorry. So the 3% in PCR will largely reflect in 3Q and not in 2Q. Is that what you mean? Half and half. I think we took it somewhere in the middle, so. Understood. Okay. That's all I have. Thank you. Thank you, Joseph. Next is a follow-up from Siddharth. Siddharth, your line is unmuted. Please go ahead. Thanks for the follow-up. Just a housekeeping question on the Reifen.com numbers, if you can share? Siddharth, Reifen.com? Yeah, yeah. Reifen.com, sorry. So Reifen.com for this quarter did EUR 45 million in revenues, had a fairly healthy growth, double-digit growth over the same period last year. And then margins continue to be broadly in the same range, which at an overall level they have been historically. So this quarter usually is flattish, right? Break-even type of margin. So that is the case, or? Yes, that is the case. Okay. Okay. Thanks a lot, sir. Thank you, Siddharth. Next is a follow-up from Raghunandan. Please go ahead. Thanks, sir, for the opportunity again. Gaurav, can you share the commodity prices? Sure, Raghunandan. So natural rubber was in the region of INR 210. Synthetic rubber, INR 190 a kg. Carbon black, INR 125 a kg. Thanks for this. And what would be the plans of the next price hike and any quantum you are planning? That's a difficult one to say, Raghu. The sales and marketing people look at the overall environment, demand, competitive action. So I would not have a timing and a figure on that. Got it, Gaurav. Thank you very much. Thank you. I guess we are at it. Since there are no further questions, would now like to hand it over back to Neeraj for closing comments. Thank you all for joining us. All the best for the holiday season, and hope to see you in February. Thank you. Thank you.