Good evening, ladies and gentlemen. Please note, this call is not for media representatives, investment bankers, or commercial bankers, including corporate and commercial forex. All such individuals are instructed to disconnect now. Ladies and gentlemen, good day, and welcome to the Mahindra Finance Q2 FY25 Investors Conference Call, hosted by Axis Capital Limited. As a reminder, all participant lines will be in the listen-only mode, and there will be an opportunity for you to ask questions after the presentation concludes. Should you need assistance during the conference call, please signal an operator by pressing star then zero on your touchtone phone. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I now hand the conference over to Mr. Praveen Agarwal from Axis Capital. Thank you, and over to you, sir. Yeah, thank you, Dale, and good evening, everyone, and welcome to this earnings call of Mahindra Finance. From the management team, we have Mr. Raul Rebello, MD and CEO, Mr. Vivek Karve, Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Sandeep Mandrekar, Chief Business Officer. I would like to invite Mr. Rebello for his opening remarks, post which he'll open the floor for Q&A. Over to you, sir. Yeah, good evening, everybody. Thank you, Praveen, for hosting us, so as usual, I will go through the, you know, the deck that we would have circulated a bit earlier. So I request you to keep the investor doc handy as I call out page numbers that I'm referring to for commentary, so let's go to page number 4, and, you know, this page number 4 basically is not specifically on Q2, but it's a reflection of what we had called out as our Mission 25 aspiration at the FY22 closing, and these aspirations are around key metrics, so the page four has them handy. Now, as we stand here at half year of FY25 and reflecting on where we are at each of these Mission 25 metrics, and what we see also as possible FY25 exit numbers, on metric one, asset quality, where we stand today, from traveling the last two and a half odd years, we see we have steadily come down on the GS3 numbers, which is at 3.8, which is below threshold levels, and the credit cost numbers also have been declining, and though there has been seasonality that plays out in H1, we do foresee for FY25 exit the credit cost numbers in the range of 1.3-1.5. I will, in the next slide, talk about specifically Q2. So this is more where we are standing on H1 and where we expect its exit on on FY 2025 total credit cost. That's in the 1.3%-1.5% range. Now, over the last two and a half years, in pursuit of the asset quality goals, we did make some conscious calls on the incremental prime customer segments that we've been acquiring. And that has come at a cost, and at maybe in this, at lower, you know, the yields are lower and what's also worked in the last two years is the whole elevated interest cycle, and that's had a bearing on our original NIM aspirations. So where we stand today and what we expect for the full year closing is in the range of 6.5%-6.6%. Moving to metric number two, which is on the book Growth Aspirations, from the 60,000 odd levels that we were at the end of 2022, we've seen some decent growth come through the last two and a half years. And on this metric specifically, I don't see any challenges in the 2x AUM that we are looking at for the full year. Mostly running, considering the very strong disbursements that we've had all across FY 2023 and FY 2024. I know FY 2025 has been muted, but the disbursement of the past should hold us in good stead to deliver the book overall numbers. Moving to metric number three on Operational Efficiency, the OpEx numbers have trended down, and we have a page which talks about the overall progress on the operational muscle that we are building, and I'll give you detailed commentary on that. On metric four, diversification, this is currently at 6%. I mean, it's at 6% currently and will go up, marginally for the rest of the year. But admitting that this is trended below plan, the plan was quite aggressive at 15% of the overall mix, and this number on reflection is something which has not played out exactly as per plan. But in full reflection, I think the MSME and leasing businesses, the building blocks have been put in place, and we are seeing some trending numbers, which are encouraging. And the recent announcement on mortgages and the insurance agency license, which we have taken in, have been, in a sense, a good building block for us to build from here. Finally, all of this is begets us to our ROA aspirations and where we are on ROA, and I know 2.5 was the aspiration. We have looked at various metrics that have influenced this number. At H1 exit, it's at 1.5, but we do have a visibility for the full year to be clearly in the 1.8- 2 range, and I would still be more bullish on the 2 range for the FY25 exit. Moving to slide 5, on specifically GS3, and here I'll get into Q2 commentary right now. So the GS3 number, while this Q2 has been 50 basis points lower than last, and, you know, it's at 3.8, but it has climbed up, you know, from by 20 basis points from the last quarter. When we diagnose what's really driving this spike, I'm sure, you know, the, the cash flow situation, everyone has a sense of where the cash flows are in the rural market, specifically the self-employed customer segment. But for us, what's really, 40% of the GS3 hike has come from the tractor segment, and we have seen and witnessed pain in certain states, whether it is mostly the agrarian states where cash flows has been disrupted, MP, Maharashtra, Gujarat, AP, Telangana. These states have seen a slightly higher amount of pain. The cash flows, not just in the agri sector, but some of the LCV, you know, the CV customer segment has also seen a bit of elevated pain in Q2, which has had a bearing on our collection efficiency and definitely the intensity of our collection has had to go up. The credit cost and provision numbers, which is on the same page, if you look at it at the bottom of the page, there has been an uptick in provision, again, flowing from the slightly higher tractor GS3 numbers. But I think the sliver of good news there is that what we have seen over the last few years, the end losses have consistently come down. So the provision uptick has caused the overall credit cost hike, but at the end loss level, we are not really seeing that stress, and that's because the flow forward to write-offs as well as the settlement losses have been consistently coming down. I request you to move to slide number 6, where we give more color on the GS3 and credit cost. What you'll notice over here is that the GS3 plus GS2 is at 10.3 presently, and I mentioned the seasonality, which is played out in H1, and also some of the specific cash flow disruptions. But with whatever levers we as the team think we have at our disposal, the GS3 plus GS2 numbers are expected to come down below 10%, and we do see the credit cost numbers, which is currently at—I mean, for the whole half year, at 1.9, and more specifically at 2.3 for the quarter. We do see the full year numbers in the 1.2- 1.5 range. Right? Again, if you... I would like to draw your attention to the last row on the table. You would see that the kind of sequential drop in the end losses, FY 2022 from 2,500 odd to 2,200 to 1,700, we see this number sliding down further. Moving to slide number 7, I'm moving to commentary on disbursements now. You would have heard commentary from auto finance players and, you know, specifically the ones who play in auto, tractors, CVs, et cetera. It's not been an overall year which has seen too much of excitement. We have seen flattish growth and from a financing standpoint, our outcomes are not too different. We have degrown quarter two versus quarter of last year. H1 has seen a marginal growth of 2%. Now, what really is working in independent asset categories, the PV segment, I would request your attention on slide number seven on the last column. PV has been flat for the year, -3% for the quarter. CV has been again, -1% for the full year, H1 versus H1. Our used vehicle business has grown 2%, tractor has degrown 3%, three-wheeler, 1%. And the real growth, what we have seen as an outlier, is the SME business, but again, very small in the scheme of things. Overall, I would say the market, we, we haven't really lost market share. We have. Our outcomes have been more a reflection of the underlying promise that you're seeing in the wheels business. I must, at this point, offer some commentary on what we have seen in October. As you know, October, all in, you know, the all-important month of October, we started the Navaratri in second, and, we finished, Dussehra by twelfth. And, you know, we have the all-important Dhanteras and Diwali upcoming. I would say we've seen some, some marginal improvement to same time last year for the festive season, but too early. We are still waiting for the Dhanteras, Diwali numbers to come out, but specifically, if I were to look at some kind of slivers of good hope, it's in the tractor segment, where we are seeing a slightly high number compared to last year in the festive season, and there are certain models which we are seeing some excitement. We are hoping to muster some of that growth in this festive season, but overall, for the rest of H2, I don't think we can have too much of excitement baked into the numbers. Request to move to slide number eight on margins. There has been a, you know, I think you've been asking us questions on how incremental yields have been coming on. This is a slide that offers some commentary there. I would say the headline number, the yields have gone up quarter to quarter, by 30 basis points, 20 basis points on the loan income and 10 basis points on the fee income, and some of the fee income is coming in from the insurance corporate agency license. But cost of funds, really not much relief here. As you know, on a stock level, though our incremental CoF is okay, but there is a debt equity playing out. So we have, you know, we have, we are consuming more capital. So, and the overall stock level of CoF doesn't move so rapidly, even though we might have a one quarter of incremental cost of funds going down. I will move to slide number nine, which is on operations, and I just want to kind of draw your attention to some of the talent augmentation that we have done. As you know, we have a very formidable team in the wheels business, but as we get more aspirational on the controls function and the new businesses, we do have to augment the team. Mahesh joined us as Chief Risk Officer from HDFC, spending many years at HDFC and some years at Yes Bank. Jaspreet Chadha has spent a decade with Bajaj Finance, and most of this time, I mean, all of the time, nearly in the housing side of it, a key member in the housing finance team, and he's joined us as our Chief Business Officer in Mortgages. Bijoy has joined as our Chief Business Officer in the leasing business, payments, fixed deposits and partnerships. Mohit Singh joined us after spending 20 years with RBI. Davinder joined in as our Chief Analytics Officer now close to a year back, but the other four have joined in in the last few months. On the tech and data side, we've gone live with the new LOS and LMS from Salesforce. We have seen, you know, especially as the augmentation, the underwriting and the risk team has come in, we've developed new entity scorecards, and our BRE and LOS LMS for the wheel business will be going live very shortly. Overall, I think, there's been good amount of traction on the OpEx side as well as the GRC side, and I do feel much more comfortable now that we have a very balanced leadership team to take care of both growth, the growth side, the risk side, as well as making sure we grow in a profitable and sustainable manner. I request to move to slide 10 and 11, where I've given a snapshot of the quarter. So highlight before I open it up for questions is that our disbursements, as I said, have been flattish. Book has grown 20%, income grown 20-21%. Our overall, you know, NIMs have stayed flat at 6.5%. Our OpEx has been coming down from 2.8%- 2.6%. PPOP levels have grown, you know, 27%. Credit cost, yes, this has been a pain. We have seen our overall, you know, credit cost numbers in rupee value terms go up, but from a credit cost percentage, as a percentage, it's come down by ten basis points. And, PAT has been up 57% for the quarter and 50% for the full, for the H1 to H1. So, the numbers are there for all of you all to see. I think I should spend more time and give you time to answer questions. So I will request you to open up the floor for Q&A. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on their touchtone telephone. If you wish to remove yourself from the question queue, you may press star and two. Participants are requested to use handsets while asking a question. Ladies and gentlemen, we will wait for a moment while the question queue assembles. The first question is from the line of Mahrukh Adajania from Nuvama Wealth. Please go ahead. Hi, good evening. So I just wanted to focus a bit on the NPLs this quarter. You attributed them largely to tractors, but one other NBFC was quite upbeat about rural demand and tractors. So is it a statewide issue? Are you already seeing green shoots in tractors? Because they were very upbeat about rains and how that really helped their business. And that call was just two days ago, so just wanted to drill a bit into that. And then, basically, growth has been slow, disbursal growth has been slow because of slowdown in demand, or it's a cautious, conscious decision? And also, is there any spillover of MFI stress into your segments, like maybe some of the family members also being MFI borrowers, any such linkage that you may have found or you would, you can guide us to? Thanks, Mahrukh. I'll take both those questions. On the tractor side, let me split it up into both the, you know, you talked about growth as well as risk. First, I'll talk about risk. While we have seen, as I said, 40% of our incremental GS3 has come in from that segment, I would like to bring a distinction between delay and default, right? What we see here is in the states which are very agrarian dependent, and I called out Maharashtra, Gujarat, MP, Telangana and AP, where they've also had an issue of the late rains, which we have seen, which would have caused some amount of disruption in the cash flows, which, you know, I, I'm sure you're watching, you know, the kind of mandi activity, which has been much slower this year because of the late rains continuing. And this delay is not for us worrying as of now, which will constitute a default. If you've seen last year also in you know, Q2, we saw part of this play out, but in Q3 and Q4, the recovery was quite good. We have a half-yearly tractor repayment, and we have a monthly. For the states which are agrarian, we have a half-yearly. The stress that we are seeing largely because, you know, that the half-yearly portfolio typically gets impacted due to the agrarian borrowers. We do not see the same amount of stress for the states which are monthly, where the tractor is used largely for haulage plus agri, right? That's the, that's the risk commentary I have on the tractor side, for which the delay and not default has played out. On the growth side, you're right, and I've also mentioned that while overall, and this is the year-to-date numbers, this is the, this is the RTO numbers, tractor has seen a H1 to H1 degrowth. But the commentary now is this H2, because of the first 15 days of October itself, we have seen a very strong uptick, right? And we just hope that we'll also be able to ride some of the tailwind of that demand, which is coming now. Because overall, you're right, it's been a good year in terms of monsoon. We just hope that these late monsoons don't disrupt the party. But overall, the rainfall has been good, and we expect with the MSP being positive and the overall, you know, yields also being positive, that the rural and agrarian outcomes for the next half of the year, we'll see tractor having a good patch, and we should be able to ride that. Coming to your second question on overall growth and why it's been muted, I don't see our outcomes, you know, very different from the commerce that has happened in the three-wheeler scene. We don't play in two-wheeler. Two-wheeler has had a good growth. It's had close to 10% growth. But three-wheeler, passenger vehicle, tractor, CV business, used vehicle, I don't see our growth being too divergent from the underlying commerce. In some segments, yes, we have been about couple of points lower. We do realize that, you know, we've got to participate in segments which will not give us risk outcomes in the near future. On the MFI stress, we don't do MFI lending, but if you are talking about the customer segment, we really don't have an overlap. There could be a minor, minor overlap in the three-wheeler segment, where, you know, some borrowers, some lady, some, let's say, in the same household, you would have some households taking microfinance. But our three-wheeler customers, these assets, while, you know, microfinance customers, there's a opaqueness between consumption and credit and, you know, what flows into real investment. Our loans goes specifically for the three-wheeler, and we don't really do any consumption in that segment. So we are not seeing too much stress from the three- from the microfinance customer segment, which are very different customer segment to the customer segment we have in our portfolio. Got it. Thank you. Thanks. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Nischint Chawathe from Kotak Institutional Equities. Please go ahead. Just a couple of questions. You know, first- Nischint, can you be a little louder? I can't hear you really clearly. Yeah, just a couple of questions. You know, first on, you know, some data-keeping questions. You know, what is the NPL versus gross stage 3? And do you share the data every time in the call? Yeah, the GS3 number is for the quarter and half year, 3.8. Yeah. That's your question, right? No, no. The question is, you know, as per RBI definition, right? The GNPA, as per IRAC, is INR 6,000 crore, versus the Stage 3 of INR 4,309 crore. In rupee value. In rupee value. So that would be, that would be roughly, maybe another 1.5% you can add, roughly, to the number. Got it. You know, we saw fairly strong fee income this quarter. I believe, you know, you've been talking about initiatives like insurance, et cetera, so just curious, is it something which is sustainable, or was there certain one-off this quarter? and you know, is it fair to kind of annualize this? Yeah, Nischint, some of the numbers are structural because we have tied up with six partners, as I mentioned, across life, health, and motor. And, there is a stated aspiration to grow that income, along with other sources of income also, which are non-specifically loan income. So yes, you can expect to see the, you know, the income coming in, and being at a level which should grow going forward. On ECL coverage, I know you said that, you know, somewhere during the year we'll probably, you know, we may probably review the coverages on each of the buckets. But this quarter, you know, you seem to have sort of maintained coverage on Stage 1, 2, and 3, respectively. So, you know, is there any particular thought process over here? Or would the multiples remain similar for the rest of the year as well? So, Nischint, hi, Vivek here. You recall that we had guided that we will see some improvement in the overall LGD numbers and therefore coverage ratios in the second half of the current year, and we are maintaining that. Got it. And just one, you know, qualitative question, and this is really on growth. I know we discussed about tractors, kind of, you know, seeing good demand, but, you know, what about other segments? You know, what is the outlook over here, you know, for the second half and probably, you know, going into the medium term as well? Yeah. So on the rest of the wheels category, Nischint, I mean, I would still say it's gonna be a conservative full year. While the festive period, the first half of the festive period from Navaratri to Dussehra was okay, then you have, of course, a second buildup that happens before Diwali. I don't think basis the overall what's happened in the first half of the year, we will have something which is really going to be spectacular to have a full year outcome, which will be very positive. There are certain green shoots, there are certain... For example, you've seen in the Mahindra portfolio, like Thar, which has had great numbers, and we have got a good market share. So we will try to find growth opportunities within those pockets of opportunities which exist. But on a consolidated basis, I think after two years of great run in most wheels categories, we are going to see a little bit of, you know, a moderate year. What kind of a growth are you kind of, you know, budgeting going forward in the next two years? You know, how are you really capacitating the business? Yeah, see, I can give you a three-year, I mean, we are looking at with the choices available to us, and now some of the new businesses added, the SME business, and, you know, we have stated our plans on the mortgage side. We are looking from a three-year horizon to be in the 15%-20% CAGR. I mean, that's more like a directional three-year aspiration. Got it. Thank you very much, and all the best. Thanks. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Abhijit Kundra from Motilal Oswal Financial Services. Please go ahead. Yeah, good evening, everyone. So first things first, I mean, just kind of taking the last question, again, you have guided for credit costs of 1.3%-1.5%. I'm sure some of this is, penciling in the recoveries from the tractor segment, ones, which have slipped in this quarter. And the other thing that you said is also, that from the improvement in LGDs, we might see, release in initial provisions coming through. So, I mean, the, the second part, release in initial provisions coming through, can you throw some more light on that, versus where we are in terms of provision coverage ratio? What could it end up, and will it be more back-ended in terms of more coming in four Q or we will see it to be more gradual in three Q and then in four Q? Yeah. So, thanks, Abhijit. I'll take part of it and hand over parts to, to Vivek. So the reason why we have a certain confidence in the credit cost, which let's say for H1 is at 1.9, which we say will come down from 1.3 to 1.5, you would have seen something similar last year, you know, when we ended, let's say, credit cost at 2.3 and we brought it down to 1.7. I mean, this is. I'm just getting your memory back to last year. Why this number changes and, why this number really moves is, one, because of real recovery that happened in the second half of the year, where cash flows improved and some of the slippages, as I called out, as delays, not default, right? The collections come back and the overall stock of GS3 usually moderates in the second half, which definitely has one, it doesn't create any more incremental provision. Two, it kind of also, you know, make sure that we're able to, you know, to get the credit cost back because there is no incremental flow forward. You're right, the second lever over there, I don't want to take away the play that the LGD will have. You know, we are still at a high level of 59.5 and we have a 42-month average. We do see that this is the prediction of the model, that this number will come down. Now, I don't want to put you know, get ahead of ourselves and give you exactly that 59.5 will come down to what number, but we have clear visibility that there will be a kind of a reduction in that number, which is more reflective of our current LGDs. Exactly, you know, the current LGDs. And hence, both of these working together gives us confidence of the targeted credit cost number, which is, as I said, at exit of H1 at 1.9, coming to a 1.3-1.5 level. Thank you. Yeah, Abhijit, I have nothing to add. Got it. Okay. And then, I mean, the other two questions that I had was, again, in terms of margins, H1, we closed at 6.5%, and the full year we have guided for 6.5%-6.7%. We are essentially talking about, margins to improve from here. So we're just trying to understand, is part of this because of the trade advances which typically were given in 2Q and will get converted, into retail loans in 2Q? Does it have some bearing on this, or how are we thinking about, margin improvement coming in the second half? And the second thing is, you also, I mean, if you look at our disbursement mix, given that large proportion, a good 40% comes from PVs, and PVs, I mean, among all segments, right, I mean, it seems like it's slowing down now. So, I mean, while you've already commented on the outlook, 15%-20% over the next three years that you're looking to grow at, including some of the newer businesses that you're incubating, on vehicle alone, how are we thinking about growth for the next second half and the next couple of years? Yeah. So, just remind me of your first question. I I lost it. The first one was regarding? Margin. Margin. Okay. Yeah, so, on margin and, you know, getting this number from 6.5%- 6.7%, I think it is a combination of what we think is, you know, we have been incrementally passing on, the IRRs have been going up, and some of that will help us on the stock level. Then there's the fee income, which also kind of augments the NIM, the NIM number to go up from where it is currently. I do not look at trade advance being a big influencer in that. Trade advance has a Q2 impact because we give it and the Q2 numbers go down a bit, but it's not going to be something which moves the needle in a large manner. That's on the margin front, and I said these are all, you know, what's in our complete control is passing on interest rates, doing, as you know, the more tractor we do in the second half of the year gives us a lift. The more used we do, which is now 18% of the mix, that also improves the IRR and the fee-based income. So that's the broad influencing, you know, levers for the 10-15 basis points increase in our overall NIM. And, I mean, I've not factored in any credit cost, I mean, any kind of fund cost over here because we don't have any visibility of fund costs going down. Coming to your second question on overall growth, for the rest of the year, you're right, PV is not going to have a very strong outing for the year from a disbursement standpoint. However, you know, in PV, there is still a decent amount of NTC customer segments as well as close to prime customer segment. Now that we have got reasonable confidence in our NTC scorecards and the ability to underwrite NTC customers, we do see you know, scope for us to further participation there. It's not gonna be, the rest of the financial is not gonna be extremely bullish, and we are not extremely bullish. But since you also asked on a three-year period, see, the vehicle businesses will have a certain growth trajectory for the next three years, PV, CV, tractor, et cetera. I don't think we will have very, very steeper acquisition compared to the rest of the rest of the pack. We will maintain, protect our market shares, and maybe in some segments, especially as we've been seeing on the used car, used tractor, in some now we have a used CV team also. We will try to increase our overall participation there. But in the next three years, you will see our growth largely mirror the growth of the underlying commerce in the used business. Okay, this is [Kundra]. Thank you so much, and wish you and your team the very best. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Raghav Garg from Ambit Capital. Please go ahead. Hey. Hi, Hi, thanks for the opportunity. I have my first question on the net slippages, so it seems that the slippages have been quite high in this quarter, about INR 800-INR 820 crores. Is that for full year, it was about 1,500 crores of slippages on a net basis. This year, first half, we are already clocking close to that number, 1,500. Q3, Q4, because that would essentially determine that we are able to, Hello, please, come a bit close to your handset. You sound a bit distant. Can you hear me now? Yes, sir, you are audible. Hello? Yes, sir, you are audible now. Okay. First, my question was on net slippages. So last year, full year, your slippages were around fifteen hundred crores, and 1H FY25 is a similar number. What gives you the confidence that, you know, despite slippages being higher in this year, you will be able to deliver a lower credit cost? Am I audible? Yeah. Can you hear me? Yes, I can hear you. Okay. Yeah, good. No, no, you're, you're right. The slippages for the first half of the year have been higher than last year. And while the overall slippages in Q2 have been higher than Q1, as I mentioned, largely from the tractor and LCV space. You know, you can't, I think, map slippages and credit cost apple to apple, because in credit costs, there are two variables. There is provision write-off, and there is, of course, as we've mentioned in the provision, the LGD play. So while slippages can be controlled in H2, which is mostly from recoveries of what happened in Q1 and Q2, more specifically Q2, there is a credit cost, you know, outcome, which we are... which, we have visibility of choosing, which is, largely driven by both the recoveries in whatever has slipped, as well as because, as I mentioned earlier, we have a, you know, we have a certain relief coming in from the coverage ratios. Okay. So you're essentially saying that, you know, even if the slippages are higher, there could be some bit of a reversal, as you might say, something similar that you did last year in third quarter. Is that understanding correct? No, what are you referring to in third quarter? What we did? There was some release of provisions, right? Because of a set of ECL assumptions, which happened in the third quarter of 2024. No, no, no, we didn't do any manual. This was just a model refresh, which we did annually. So there was nothing that we artificially overlaid over the ECL model in Q3 last year. I'll just invite Vivek to be more specific. But yeah, I just want to clarify, there was nothing that we did, you know, specifically on releasing provisions. No, in fact, there was hardly any provision released. Only about 80 odd crores that was released, and that too, not intentional, it was an outcome of the model refresh that we did. Going back to your question on what will also drive a lower credit cost in H2 and therefore for the full year, is also the confidence that we have on the credit losses. You would have seen the way our credit losses have been trending for the last two, three years, and even in the H1. We expect the same performance to continue in the second half of the year as well. Okay, sure. My other question is that, you know, while you're pointing out that 40% of the slippages are paying have come from the tractor segment, I think this was true even in last year, right? Majority of our... L ast year was also from. In the tractor segment, where is that? Which is that segment where you are- Could you come a bit close to your handset? Better now? Hello. Yes, sir. Yeah. Okay. Sir, my second question was on, you know, just trying to understand, a little bit more, granularity of the, slippages. So this year, 40% has come from tractors. Last year, it was the same case, a substantial part of the pain had come from tractor segment. But apart from that, which is, or what are those other segments where, you are seeing, pain? Because it seems that even, excluding the tractor segment, the pain is higher versus, what it was last year. . Yeah, so, you know, I talked about the distinction between delay and default. I think the Q2 number, which we saw last year in tractor, and some of it is we have also addressed, we're addressing it while structuring our half-yearly loan repayments and making sure that they mimic the harvest cycle, so that we don't see this, and we see a repayment schedule more reflective of the harvest cycles, especially for the agrarian customer segment. Besides the 40%, you know, let me first close the tractor. I do see that in Q3 and Q4, I don't expect everything to come back in the month of October. There might be October, November, December kind of a comeback, because there is a Rabi season which plays out, and the late monsoons might lead to a little bit you know furthering the whole recovery of whatever slipped in Q2. Other than the tractor segment, which we saw in Q2 specifically add to the GS3 sequential increase, there are segments. You know 70-80% of our customers are self-employed non-professionals. Many of them are acquiring you know small commercial vehicles and ply these vehicles for specifically you know their commerce activities. We have seen some delays over there and I don't think you know we can be insulated. You know that income levels for largely many parts of the self-employed and semi-urban customer segments have seen some disruptions in this year. I'm sure you've heard commentary about overall leverage levels also being slightly high and income, income flows being a little muted. So there is going to be sustained effort in a year like this to spend more, to recover more, and more kind of collection intensity to ensure that the collection numbers are up. But I don't want to shy away from the fact that this is not a year equivalent to maybe, you know, last year or the year before last, where, where, you know, underlying constraints or underlying kind of cash flows are as rosy as they were in the past. We have to make more efforts in collections. The good thing is that all our loans are secure, so we don't see the reason why the customers who we have onboarded will not pay. They might pay with a little bit of a delay, but we don't see this as, you know, a weakness overall. Okay, thanks. That was all from my side. Thanks. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Kunal Shah from Citigroup. Please go ahead. Yeah. Thanks for taking the question. So firstly, on the margin side, so if we look at it on the margins, you indicated that there have been some increase in the lending rate. But, so but when we look at it, last time you indicated that maybe there is some shift which is happening with respect to the prime customers, and that almost seems to have been done, and that negative impact would be lower. So are we equally confident that maybe that might not have the impact on the margins? Hi, Kunal. Thanks for your question. If you refer to slide number 8, you would see that the loan income actually from last year to this year has gone up by 20 basis points. I did provide commentary that, you know, we have reached our targeted acquisition mix of prime mix customers. We had a mix aspiration of 15%-20% of our incremental sourcing to be from that, super prime or, you know, above prime segment. We have reached those thresholds. Do we kind of, you know, completely put a full stop for that customer segment? No, we continue to acquire customers in that band of 15%-20%. And some of the product launches, which we're doing in partnership with OEMs, helps us get some volumes. You know, in a year like this, it's always balancing between growth and margins. And we're aware of the fact that chasing a customer segment which will give us, let's say, negative overall NIMs, is something that we take stock of for every business unit, and every business unit has a stated incremental mix which comes in. So you're right, that this number has been, to a large extent, we've hit the ceiling on that. Sure. And secondly, what you have been indicating in terms of bringing about the consistency and to lower the quarterly volatility as such, but again, in Q2, we have not really seen that with respect to maybe the additions to the slippage as well as the overall credit cost. So that consistency somehow with the change in the customer mix is also to an extent not, you know, visible. So how should we go? No doubt, you indicated it's largely because of tractors, but how should... Yeah, because that volatility still continues to be towards the second half. And secondly, related to that, so is it like we have not reviewed the ECL model this time, and hence there is no change in the coverage ratios? Or the only thing is maybe the kind of customers or the sourcing quality which you indicated last time, that seems to have deteriorated, and that's the reason it's, like, almost stable this quarter. Kunal, hi, Vivek here. We review our ECL model every quarter, so the PD and LGD refresh happens every quarter. So it's not that we haven't reviewed. What we have also indicated is that, because it's a quarterly refresh, new data comes in for the latest quarter and old data from the farthest quarter goes away. We are expecting these coverage ratios to decline in the second half, reflective of the fact that the base which contained COVID affected period will go away. But it's not that we have not reviewed and we have not refreshed our ECL model. We have done it, and we have been doing it consistently. Yeah, on the volatility part, Kunal, while you're right, Q2 for the last two years have seen an uptick, and we've mentioned the reasons for that. It is a stated aspiration that we would like to level down the kind of inter-quarter movements. In a business where you have a decent amount of mix on certain asset categories which are subject to inherent volatility, like the tractor segment, we are constantly looking at ways and means to, you know, to kind of iron out that volatility, which would be, one, on customer segment, two, on the kind of the way in which loan EMIs are structured in terms of, as I said, reflecting that the EMIs coincide with the harvest period. But we already have a large book, and that book, you know, you can't restructure a book, et cetera. So within a book which is quite large and an incremental book, there will be choices of playing that out. And in the medium to long term, it is our stated aspiration. We do not like this kind of inter-quarter volatility ourselves. But we do recognize the fact that some of the underlying asset categories, if you don't have a much more holistic approach towards the way in which we also decide the, you know, the customer segment, how do you overall build resilience by making sure that the cash flows are, as I said, mirrored into the repayment cycles, et cetera? So yes, it's a journey we are on. I think if you go back, wind back the clock two years, this inter-quarter volatility would have been much higher. It still exists, and it is, as I said, our stated aspiration to iron it down further. Okay. Thank you. Thank you. All the best. Yeah. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Avinash Singh from Emkay Global. Please go ahead. Yeah, good evening. Couple of questions. The first one, if I see your geographical breakout, the Kolkata region, it seems, is kind of slowing down in terms of AUM and disbursement. So is it just the impact of your, whatever happened in, Mizoram and that leading to, or are you seeing some challenges into kind of a wider geography, including, West Bengal? So that's from the first. And second, I mean, you had, I guess, a month or so earlier, filed around your co-lending arrangement with SBI. So if you can just throw some color on that, the co-lending arrangement, the idea in sort of a, you know, a medium-term target there, and what do you expect to achieve from that? Thanks. Yeah, thanks. You know, I'll take the first question first. You're right, we have reduced our disbursement acquisition by almost 200 basis points. And it's a combination of both reasons, as you mentioned. One is we did have a complete review of the way in which some of the Northeast playbook of acquisitions and Northeast is not, you know, not an easy terrain. So this incident, which happened last fiscal quarter, did nudge us to look at our inherent practices as well as some of the risk mitigation requirements for that location, which has had a bearing in the overall incremental acquisition. At the same time, when we, you know, when we also look at the underlying disbursements that are happening in some of those markets, I would say that, there has been some weaknesses in some markets. So the combination of both factors, one, us consciously relooking at, at the aggressive levels of participation that we had in the past with what happened as that one-time incident, and also some states have seen some amount of drop in overall throughput. Your second question on SBI, you know, the thought process there, and I think Abhijit Kundra mentioned that PV is a big source of our segment. CV is also a big source of our incremental volumes. As the segments become incrementally more competitive from a rate standpoint, with some of the large banks, who we don't see being a very active partner or active player in the acquisition, but still have a lot of cost of funds advantage, like an SBI. There could be segments in the PV segment or the CV fleet segment, where we do believe that instead of losing, as I said earlier, also, we have hit the ceiling on our prime customer segments, and hence, we may not be able to offer our balance sheet as a, you know, put our balance sheet on the table for incremental volumes, but we can clearly put our distribution on the table for incremental volumes. And hence, for this prime customer segment, either in the PV or the CV side, fleet customer segment, the thinking behind the SBI and of course, not just SBI, we have with Bank of Baroda, and we have with some other banks, too. That's the logic of the partnerships and the co-lending arrangements. Any sort of, you know, a target there, say, over the next one, two years, not in quarters? See, I mean, I'll be consistent what we have said to everybody, that when we get into a partnership, we don't get into, you know, too many partnerships. We get into some meaningful ones. And the aspirations there is, over the medium term, to at least, for our kind of, size and scale, to be doing close to at least, you know, INR 25-40 crores monthly throughput with any partner. I mean, that's the aspiration, when we sign our partnerships. Okay, thank you. Thank you. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Ajit Kumar from Nomura. Please go ahead. Thanks for, you know, taking my question, and good evening, everyone. You know, I had two questions. First, what is the reason of sudden steep decline in capital adequacy ratio? It is down 180 basis points Q and Q. Any plans of capital raise when CAR looks to be very close to minimum regulatory requirement? That is first question. Second one, on growth again, while you have already given qualitative feedback, what would be your disbursement and loan growth target now for FY25 especially, you had an earlier guidance for low teens disbursement growth in FY25, which now looks difficult to achieve. Yeah, I mean, these two questions from my side. Thank you. I'll take the disbursement one first, and hand it over to Vivek for the other one. So, see, the disbursement for the year has been 2%, and clearly, as pointed out in the chart, which shows the segment-wide disbursement, besides SME, which has grown at 50+, the rest have been low. And we, if I just look at a simple extrapolation of the numbers, if we continue at the same rate of growth that we had for H1, the book growth for the year would be at 18%. Right? Because... And that's not happening because of any recent disbursement, but because of the strong disbursement over the last two years. I'm not saying that we will grow at the same rate as H1, but, you know, if we see some very strong number improvement or some, you know, late catch-up, it could go up another hundred, two hundred, three hundred basis point, not more than that, for the full year, so there is a disbursement number which is going to be flattish or muted, for the year, but the book number will still gain from the past disbursements, and I've given you my aspirations for the three-year CAGR, so, you know, by that time, we should have some other levers at our disposal with the new businesses to achieve that kind of, of a CAGR. Vivek, over to you. Yeah. So on your first question, on the capital adequacy ratio, in the second quarter, there has been a dividend payout to the shareholders, which is one of the reasons why our net owned funds have come down. The other reason is, if you look at the sequential growth in the asset base, it has increased by about 5.7%, and that also increases the financial leverage, which brings the CAR down. However, our Tier 1 capital continues to be near the 15% mark against the regulatory floor, which is 9%. So we are very comfortable out there. So at least in the current financial year, I don't see a reason for raising any fresh equity. Sure. Sure. Thank you, everyone. Thanks a lot. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Xuan Rao from Schonfeld. Please go ahead. Hey, thank you for the opportunity. Just following up on the growth side, if we still expect, you know, flattish to maybe single digit growth for this year, you know, what's your best guess when will we start to see revival of growth towards the, let's say, double digit or even mid-teens level? Because if we sustain at, you know, single digit level, the book growth by, you know, sometimes first half next year could come down quite rapidly. So just want to understand, you know, do you have any visibility on the growth revival? Thank you. Yeah. So, see, you know, the H2, and I've mentioned this, the H2 growth for the wheels businesses are going to be, I mean, not too, we are not too bullish on a very strong recovery, just based what's happening in the underlying demand side. We are seeing demand side squeeze happening across different segments. So, what we can anticipate is there could be some amount of traction in this festive period, and in specific segments, which might see some recovery, particularly tractors. So, the whole year disbursements still would be, would not be very aggressive. And I've mentioned it, you know, we are currently at two. We can possibly, maximum if we buy more market share, grow up by another, end of year, maximum about 200 basis points more. When you look at the next year and the next two, three years, by that time, we might have some more levers available to us. You know, I'm giving you not an FY 2026 guidance or a 2027 guidance, but a three-year guidance. Not guidance, but an aspiration is to clearly have disbursement CAGR in the corridor of mid-teens. And that would only be possible if we get some of our new businesses to also start firing and protect market share in the wheels businesses. Got it, sir. And next one is a bit of a medium-term question on the credit cost. You know, I understand that in the interim, you know, we have coverage reversals as a result of a good improvement on the loss ratio. But at some point of time, you know, the coverage ratio will normalize and the, you know, credit costs going forward should trend, you know, more similar to our net slippages, which, you know, obviously this year doesn't seem to be coming down versus last year. So how should we think about the medium-term credit costs? And also, you know, do you expect the medium-term slippages to be much lower? And is this through, you know, a better industry cycle or we have, you know, material plans on structural improvement on our end? Thank you. See, the overall credit cost, which is essentially looking at a more medium-term outlook, you know, we have come down significantly from our peak levels. So, being at the 3.4%-3.8%, we were at end of last fiscal at 3.4%, we are now 3.8%. So there is a certain amount of base which we have come to, which is largely the, you know, we're looking at now making sure that the incremental flow forwards from the Stage 2 doesn't happen, and whatever is recently flown into Stage 3, they recover as much from there. So credit cost is a summation of provisions that would hit you if your stock levels of GS3 and GS2 goes up. And that's what I mentioned, in this environment, we are placing a lot of focus on our collection teams, equipping them more, using much more, you know, analytics to use which toolkits for which customers, to just make sure that the incremental flow forwards don't happen, so that the stock doesn't increase and invite more provisions. When it comes to end losses, I've already given you a picture about. An end losses is basically a summation of what moves from the existing GS3 portfolio to write-off, which will be at thirty-six months. That number, we have reasonable confidence of it being, you know, trending down because the stock of flow forward itself is reducing. We are managing to have settlement losses when since we are repossessing vehicles quicker and disposing them off quicker, the losses we incur from disposals are going down. So let's say we were incurring INR 100 on a sale of an asset. Now we're incurring, you know, INR 100 loss. Now we are incurring INR 90. So that reduction on both the side should see credit costs, you know, for us, if we are able to keep the incremental flow forward at levels which are in that, as I said, for a business model like ours, we should be able to keep credit costs in the 1.2-1.5 corridor, right? Even in a cycle which is looking a little challenging. Got it, sir. Thank you so much. Thank you. The next question is from the line of Neeraj Toshniwal from UBS Securities. Please go ahead. Yeah, hi. So wanted to understand how much increase you've already passed on and how much space you more have in this year and continuing to do? Neeraj, your voice was a bit, you know, unclear. Could you just repeat that, please? Hi, is it better now? Yeah. My question is, how much increase you've already passed on, and there's a further scope to, you know, pass on any increase, so will it be able to pass on to the customers? Yeah. So we just to be fair to all the disclosures I've done so far, we don't give an asset to asset category, but all I could say is that in the last two I mean, you know, in Q1 and Q2, there's been a steady increase passed on, specifically in the PV segment. We are already, as you know, in certain segments like tractor, et cetera, us versus banks versus other NBFCs, we have already been at a high level. So those segments we are to be competitive, we have not increased. But in the PV segment, we do, we have passed on. One could say that some of the mix change also because our incremental sourcing and used has gone up, so at an overall incremental yield, we have seen some benefits from that segment shift. And you know, as our cost of funds are not going down, it makes sense for us to, as and when we can pass on, to pass on with the same amount of levels that we're seeing in our cost of funds. So I could say in Q1 and Q2, there's been a steady increase in incremental IRRs being passed on. Quantify how much increase these are being? Do we, just to be sure, do we publish this data? No, we don't. But we can look at, your input is taken. We can look at making this a disclosure from next time onwards. And on cost income, just what are the things overall, net income is higher. So where you will, where this- While we can hear you, your voice is very muffled. So, can you come closer or just speak slower, maybe we'll be able to catch you. So cost to income, so overall, as overall revenue has increased due to fee income pool, where is that, the cost to income ratio for future? What is our guidance? Are you talking about cost to income ratios? Yes. Okay, okay. Yeah, cost to income has, you know, it's come down to, if I recollect, closer to a 40%. You could recollect this number was, what page number? Yeah. Yes. Thank you. Yeah, I remember seeing it as about 40%. At a peak, it was closer to a 43%, cost to income. So the one, two, which are, can it sustain or is there further improvement room available from there? Yeah, see, it is our, we would like to increase the numerator more than the denominator. Sorry, the denominator more than the numerator. You know, the kind of activities on the numerator side would be as we build out the mortgage business and some of the new businesses. They will incur costs, but we are just hoping that more of the revenue and you know, we've kind of seeded some new activities on fee-based income, et cetera, which should keep this number in this range. I mean, ideally, for a business like ours, being lower than 40 would be actually better, somewhere between 38- 40%. So now, thank you so much. Thank you. The next question is on the line of Gaurav Sharma from HSBC. Please go ahead. Yeah, am I audible? Yeah. Yes, sir, you are. Yeah. So Yeah. So thank you for giving me an opportunity. Just one question on your rural housing book. So the NPAs have been higher since long, although it has decreased year over year, but it increased sequentially. So what are the action plans you are taking to improve the quality in this segment? Yeah, so the Rural Housing Finance, if you look at the overall picture, while they have had a challenge, they have seen, you know, the GS3 numbers come down, I think now to close to 9%. Same time last year was 12%, and it's been, I would say from last Q1, it's been almost flattish to come down a bit, right? And let's also understand that the denominator is really not increasing a lot. We are focusing more on collections. Another number that we are rationalizing the organization also, if you see from last quarter, same time from, you know, close to 10,000 employees, about 3,500 employees have also reduced. So we are rationalizing the organization. We're making sure most of the staff in the collection functions are, since we have also exited most of the low-ticket housing loans. The overall theme at, at this subsidiary is to, ensure that we are able to, get the asset quality under control. There is no growth compulsion at the moment. And when we look at the asset quality also, it is going to be largely from recoveries and, you know, settlements, that we do, not by getting the GS3 percentage down by increasing the denominator or increasing the book. So this is a patch of time wherein the management team is focused on getting the ship in order. As I mentioned, we've got Jaspreet, who's come in to head mortgages at Mahindra Finance, but we have currently seconded him to the Rural Housing Finance company to also provide leadership, guidance and leadership, bench strength to get this organization, at least in the next two quarters, you know, the aspiration to get the GS3 numbers closer to the 5.5%-6% levels. Understood, sir. Understood, sir. Thank you so much, sir. That was my only question. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, that was the last question for today. We have reached the end of our Q&A session. I would now like to hand the conference over to the management for closing comments. Thank you. Thank you, Praveen and Axis team. Thank you, everyone, for joining us on this call. As we have mentioned, it's been a quarter which has had its challenges. We are cognizant of the external environment, and for us, in an environment where we've got to make sure that the asset quality is top priority, we are spending a lot of attention in the collection outfit, in making sure, like the similar collection model which we brought into action post-COVID, that office is pretty much set up to make sure that we have all our, you know, all our initiatives running well for making sure that in this scenario, we are top of mind in ensuring that customers prioritize us for collections. At the same time, when there are growth constraints overall, as the macros for the wheel business don't look extremely positive, we are making sure that we find our areas of growth within the, you know, we have our green shoots, and we're able to identify them and exploit them. So it's a fine balance as always between growth, margins, and risk, and the organization is prioritizing that. We want to wish all of you; we know we are right in the middle of the festive season. So the upcoming Diwali is a very important period for us to get even some of the business volumes, and wishing all of you and your families a very happy Diwali and a happy festive season going ahead. Thank you again, Praveen and team. Thank you. On behalf of Axis Capital Limited, that concludes this conference. Thanks for joining us. You may now disconnect your lines.