Good afternoon, this is the COROSCO conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the Generali Group's First Quarter 2025 Results Presentation. As a reminder, all participants are in listen-only mode. After the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Should anyone need assistance during the conference call, they may signal an operator by pressing star and zero on their telephone. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Fabio Cleva, Head of Investor and Rating Agency Relations. Please go ahead, sir. Hello everyone, and thank you for joining our first quarter 2025 results call. Here with us today, we have the Group General Manager Marco Sesana, the CEO of Insurance Giulio Terzariol, and the Group CFO Cristiano Borean. Before opening for Q&A, let me hand it over to Marco and Cristiano for some opening remarks. Hi everyone, good morning. Let me start by saying that these results mark the first step of Generali's next chapter within the Lifetime Partner 27: Driving Excellence Plan presented in Venice in January. Soon after the Investor Day, the new strategy has been cascaded to the whole organization and operationalized through the setup of strategic programs. Implementation is focused to deliver seamless experience for our customers across channels and support to our advisors. Redesign of Group Standard on the first five critical touchpoints is already underway and will be included into the whole business unit implementation plan by September. Other programs aim to secure our objective to profitably size P&C pocket of growth, such as SME and climate, and build a leadership position in protection, health, and accident on top of transformation enablers such as shared service. On AI and data, we are scaling the development of our 16 flagship AI applications, targeting over 60% adoption in the 10 largest business units already by the end of 2025. One example is our Geospatial Intelligence Platform, now active in four business units that will be live in 10 within the next nine months, boosting our risk monitoring and pricing in property underwriting. As you know, this is an ambition plan where P&C is a key driver. Coming to our first quarter result, this shows that we are off to a good start, maintaining strong P&C momentum from the previous plan, thanks to the action we implemented and the focus on the profit pool we have described during the Investor Day. The P&C top line is growing strongly at 8.6%. The vast majority of this is thanks to pricing, but volumes also are picking up in non-motor. We expect this growth mix to evolve over the planned horizon with the increase in multi-holding customers and our strategic focus on health and accident driving more volume growth over time. The top line dynamics of the first quarter reflect the fact that after two years of intense pruning, we have now a very clean portfolio, and we are therefore well positioned to reduce pruning while maintaining a strict underwriting discipline. Pricing continues to be conducive and in excess of risk premium across most of our geographies. The average annual premium is growing at a healthy rate of around 6%, and in motor, it is now growing at around 8%. We implemented double-digit tariff increases in Germany at the January renewals. Pricing remained very good in Italy, and it has improved materially in Spain in the last six to nine months. Let's look at margins. As you know, our target and our business steering are focused on the undiscounted combined ratio. However, I'm also very pleased that we achieved a reported combined ratio below 90%. The combination of larger volume coming through and the sharp portfolio repricing in an environment where frequency is under control and claim inflation has normalized makes me very confident about the future development. The improvement in the various technical metrics that we monitor at the business unit level gives me plenty of reason to expect a continuation of this positive underlying trend. We set ourselves an undiscounted combined ratio target of around 94.5% by the end of 2027, which also takes into account the volume growth we plan to achieve. Clearly, the first quarter combined ratio also benefited from positive seasonality in terms of NATCAT, with around EUR 50 million claims in the first quarter, with a 0.6 percentage point impact on the combined ratio, while our NATCAT budget for 2025 is a 2.8 percentage point. We have not experienced major events in the second quarter so far. Let me share that according to our preliminary estimate, the group is expected to book around EUR 25 million of claims from the power outage in Spain in the second quarter, and that exposure to liability contracts of our clients in Spain is very much contained. Now, moving to life, let me remind you of our planned target together between EUR 25 billion and EUR 30 billion of cumulative life net flows in our Lifetime Partner Plan 27. The EUR 3 billion in the first quarter is a very strong start. These flows are driven by our preferred line of business, so we had EUR 1.4 billion of net inflow in Protection and Health and EUR 1.2 billion in Hybrid and Unit-Linked. This reflects the attractiveness of our product offering, the great job done by our agent and advisor, and the strong focus on customer experience. The numbers also demonstrate the gradual and ongoing improvement of lapses in Italy. Surrenders in Italy have not yet returned to the normal level, but they are on a good trajectory. Just to give you a sense, in the first quarter, surrenders were down 20% year-on-year in Italy. As Cristiano explained in the previous call, our CSM now reflects more conservative lapse hypotheses, so we feel comfortable with the whole development. In this environment, we maintain a disciplined underwriting as our key principle. Let me share some quality data points. In the first quarter, over 81% of our new production has no guarantees. This is around 10 percentage points more than in the first quarter of last year. The average guarantee on the guaranteed new business is almost 10 basis points lower than last year. The share of new production coming from capital-like products exceeds 89% compared to 85% in the first quarter of 2024. The new business margin also increased by 26 basis points compared to last year. Please bear in mind that the lower interest rate environment compared to the first quarter of 2024 has impacted the new business margin by 25 basis points. This means that the underlying margin of new business, excluding the market factor, has improved by over 50 basis points year-on-year. Additionally, as you know, we use rates of January, but please consider that if we measure our margin with the interest rate at the end of the first quarter, the number would be around 15 basis points higher. It is also important to note that the first quarter new business margin is impacted by the French protection business, without which the new business margin would be around 5.4%. Going forward for the next quarter, we target a new business margin between 5.25% and 5.75% under the current interest rate environment, and excluding the impact of large collective contracts that might blur the picture from quarter to quarter. Now, let me close with a final word on investment and on asset allocation. The first four months of 2025 have seen significant financial market volatility. However, equity and credit markets have recovered most of their early April moves. Thanks to our discipline and liability-driven asset allocation, we are well positioned to manage this environment, as also demonstrated by our resilient capital position as adverse market changes occurred in April. These can also be observed by the fact that, excluding the volatile effects of Argentina, the current income has been increasing both in life and P&C, showing an improvement of the underlying profitability. Thanks for your attention, and let me now hand over to Cristiano. Thank you, Marco, and hello everyone. Let me provide you some additional color on our first quarter financial performance to complement what you've just heard on the underlying business trends. Starting with life, the CSM is up in the quarter with a normalized growth of 1.3%, also thanks to the positive seasonality of the new business at the beginning of the year. Most of the CSM work is already available in the press release. Let me add for completeness that we recorded positive economic variances of EUR 57 million and negative operating variances of EUR 77 million, so the overall variances were broadly flat in the quarter. The economic variances benefited from higher interest rates and rising share prices in Europe, but this was partly compensated by the fact that non-European equities posted negative returns. Less than half of our equity exposure in the general account is to listed equities, and around half of the non-listed equity portfolio is denominated in U.S. dollars, which has depreciated versus the euro during the quarter. This explains to you why we have enjoyed only moderate economic variances. Moving to operating variances, let me flag that they are entirely due to a specific one-off impact from a regulation change on the stamp duty on unit-linked reserves in Italy, which also impacted the Solvency II ratio. This is a one-and-done, with no additional impact in the future. This also means that we basically did not experience negative operating variances from lapses compared to around EUR 200 million experienced in the first quarter of 2024. The CSM release ratio of 2.5% slightly increased compared to 2024, reflecting, as I mentioned at the Investor Day, our conservative methodology on the EFA. Considering the release ratio mechanics over the year, which can also be influenced by changes in the underlying portfolio due to both enforced movements and new production, I expect our full-year 2025 CSM release ratio to be at the mid-high end of our 8-10% guidance. On the life operating investment result, we provided in the press release the key drivers of the year-on-year change, and I'm happy to elaborate on them in the Q&A. Let me, however, confirm our guidance for a full-year 2025 life operating investment result of around EUR 900 million. Moving to P&C, the key takeaway for me is that there is a powerful combination of top-line growth coupled with margin expansion at the heart of what you see in the numbers we reported, with the P&C operating insurance service result growing EUR 180 million quarter- on- quarter year-on-year. This is a growth rate of over 25%, and of course, we are very pleased by it, and it was achieved despite less discounting and conservative initial loss picks. Without these two effects, the attritional loss ratio would have improved even more. The direction of travel we see points to a non-discounted combined ratio potentially below 95% in 2025, subject to, of course, the possible volatility stemming from the natural catastrophes. As we discussed previously, we changed the threshold to classify an event as NATCAT from EUR 5 million- EUR 10 million. At the risk of stating the obvious, this will lead to a bit more volatility in the attritional loss ratio from one quarter to the next. For example, in the first quarter, we had around EUR 20 million of cumulative claims that would have been classified as NATCAT with the previous threshold, which have worsened the attritional loss ratio by almost 25 basis points. Therefore, going forward, it will be important to focus on the underlying business trends and to be able to dissect the signals from the noise in the quarterly moves, especially when it comes to the non-motor portfolio, where this slightly higher volatility is inherently more present. On prior year, some of you may ask why we had a prior year development above 2 percentage points in a quarter of benign NATCAT. There are two very simple explanations. First of all, in the first quarter, the lower revenue base amplifies the volatility of prior year development. Secondly, we had the release from some specific loss provision on large claims settled. Let me reiterate that we expect a 2% percentage point prior year development across the cycle, reflecting the prudence that we always exercise on the initial loss picks. However, you should not be surprised if there are quarters where this figure deviates from 2%, especially when the revenue base is smaller, like in the first quarter. Finally, in P&C, in the press release, we explained that excluding Argentina, the P&C investment income is up. The first quarter bears the brunt of the Argentina effect because the improvement in inflation in Argentina accelerated in the second quarter of 2024. Therefore, the differential between the first quarter of 2024 and the first quarter of 2025 is the highest. This means that the remainder of the year will be better on this front. This is why I am confident to achieve the EUR 950 million guidance for the 2025 P&C investment result. Concerning holding another, I think that what will be important going forward is to consider that this segment will record some project costs related to the strategic initiatives we defined for the new plan, which will materialize primarily in 2025 in a range between EUR 25 million and EUR 15 million more compared to 2024. Moving to solvency, our capital generation is robust and has confirmed its resilience. The 210% Solvency II ratio reflects the strong capital generation, the diversified business model, and our disciplined asset allocation, all key strengths in a volatile environment. The market factors I mentioned for the CSM apply also here for the solvency. I would like to emphasize that capital generation in the first quarter was strong. We had 4 percentage points, but this includes the impact of around EUR 300 million from the buyback related to the long-term incentive plan. Just excluding the long-term incentive plan effect, our normalized capital generation would have been in the order of EUR 1.4 billion or close to 6 percentage points, a very healthy start of the year, reflecting the positive underlying dynamics across the business. As I did last year, let me also share the fact that as of today, we have received over 95% of the remittance we planned for 2025. As we always do, we schedule the collection of almost the entirety of the remittance to the parent company before we pay the dividend to the market. To summarize, we started the Lifetime Partner 27: Driving Excellence Plan with a strong quarter, revenue growth, margin expansion, positive business dynamics that will continue to unfold across the group, and a resilient capital position. We manage the business for the long- term with a focus on value creation for our investors, as also reflected in an adjusted earning per share that is growing at 9.4% year-on-year, and with a relentless focus on keeping a strong nexus between the accounting result, the cash generation, and the solid capital position. Thank you for your attention. Operator, we are now ready for Q&A. Thank you. This is the Global Conference Operator. We will now begin the question- and- answer session. Anyone who wishes to ask a question may press star and one on your touch-tone telephone. To remove yourself from the question queue, please press star and two. Please pick up the receiver when asking questions. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. The first question is from Andrew Baker, Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Great. Thank you for taking my questions. The first one, just on the P&C combined ratio. Thanks for the additional detail on the NATCAT volatility and the attritional. Are you able to give us any sense of the man-made losses in the quarter through the attritional, how this compared to last year, and then also how you are thinking about sort of man-made losses or what your assumption is going forward that runs through the attritional? Secondly, I'm going to give it a go, but we'll see what we get on this. Is there anything at all you're able to say on the Mediobanca bid for Banca Generali, whether that be your views or, failing that, sort of how we should think about any next steps in the process going forward? Thank you. Thank you very much, Andrew. At this time, we have no further comments on the Banca Generali offer, while for the first question, I hand it over to Cristiano. Yes. Good morning, Andrew. What we observed as an amount of effect in the first quarter was an effect of man-made of EUR 35 million compared to EUR 54 million in first quarter 2024. As you know, man-made by nature is the real nitty-gritty job of insurance, should be part of the attritional and should be managed with a little bit of a pinch of salt because clearly they can move from one quarter to the other. What I can confirm is the strict underwriting discipline that has been made and improved pricing capability, which is also managing it. What I can tell you that going forward, the assumption clearly could be volatile, but we are talking of something on the order of 0.7%, slightly less than 1 percentage point of impact, with clearly a pinch of salt. As you know, there is always a balance, and the fact that we are having initial loss picks prudent allows us to manage also this kind of volatility. Great. Thank you so much. Next question, please. The next question is from Michael Huttner, Berenberg. Please go ahead. Thank you so much. I think the results are good, but I think your presentation was outstanding. It was almost like listening to some of the best analysts on the street. I mean, my colleagues, really amazing. I am struggling for questions. I have got two. Pricing, could you give us a little bit more color? You said it is ahead of claims costs, which is lovely, but maybe a little bit more color, maybe by geography. Clearly, obviously, Germany, you are making a ton of money, but maybe you could speak a bit about some of the other main markets and that huge improvement in Spain, whether that can continue. You also highlighted the prudence in the loss picks. I just wanted to get a feel. My guess is that you fully offset the higher prior year development, but I do not know. Any feel on that would be great. Thank you. Thank you very much, Michael. The first question is for Giulio, while the second one is for Cristiano. Hi, Michael. Thank you for the question. When maybe we are focusing on motor in general, what we see on the motor line of business is the average earned premium is going up about 8%, and the risk premium is going up 3%. We have a spread between the two items of about 5 percentage points, which is a very good spread. This is explaining also the improvement that we see in our motor results. We expect also to have improvement as we go further into 2025. When we look at the geography, I can tell you that in general, we have a good pitch in all geographies. In Italy, we have an average earned premium, which is well above the risk premium, so substantially. Think about more than 5 percentage points of spread. The same in Germany, where we have actually rate increases which are double digits. There is a little bit more inflation in Germany compared to what we see in other geographies, but fundamentally, we have a very good spread between the average premium and the risk premium also in Germany. France is also a positive spread. Basically, I will tell you that across the board, we see a positive development. With regard to Spain, we have double-digit rate increases in Spain, and we have basically spread to the risk premium, which is about 5 percentage points also there. What we saw in Spain, we've seen improvement in the motor combined ratio. The improvement has been a little bit clouded by some large losses, but we did not see, for example, these large losses happening in April or in the first weeks of May. From that point of view, we expect to see a further improvement in Spain. I would like to remind you that if you run the combined ratio of Spain, we are basically at a 94% combined ratio. Overall, when you put together motor and non-motor, the Spanish business is performing anyway at a good level of combined ratio, but we think we can do even better. Overall, I would say it is a very strong picture. We are very pleased with the results, and also we know that there is still some improvement that we can realize in the course of 2025. Perfect. Thank you. Good morning, Michael. Regarding the second point, I start with the end sentences. You have done a very educated guess, and I go to explain it, dedicating a few more topics out. Do not forget that on top of the 50 basis points, there are 25 basis points of the additional loss ratio impact from the change definition of the threshold. You should add the two together. On top of that, I would recall you that in the prior year development, maybe this is some, let's say, nitty-gritty points which could help any one of you better understanding. There is an asymmetric, like in the discounting, there is an asymmetric pattern throughout the year on the prior year release of the risk adjustment, which is higher in the first quarter and goes down in the second quarter, which is counterbalanced and reflected in the loss ratio part, which is again with a higher risk adjustment negative impact, while it is in the prior year positive. When looking at these quarters, especially if you do not look on a homogeneous quarter, first quarter versus this quarter, or you compare other quarters, this is an effect from two different quarters which are not the same. If they are adjacent, as a 0.7 percentage point negative impact if you compare to the fourth quarter of, for example, 2024, higher in the current year, okay? Which shows you that it is important really to compare the quarter on the proper side, there are these effects and the prudence I was mentioning. That is why our comments were particularly positive on what we have seen underlying and also with the prudence in the balance sheet. Fabulous. Thank you very much. Thank you, Michael. Next question, please. The next question is from Farooq Hanif at JPMorgan. Please go ahead. Hi. Thanks very much. You talked about non-motor and going into accident and health that was mentioned by Marco at the beginning. Can you give a bit more detail on the products that you're really focusing on in non-motor? Are you able to give us a combined ratio comparison again between non-motor and motor to give us an idea of the mixed effects there? Secondly, the discounting effect, for me anyway, was a little bit larger in one quarter, and I know that usually the effect is higher in the beginning and lower at the end. Do you have any change in view on the level of discounting effect for the full year? I guess the last point, a question is, we're seeing a lot of very good pricing supporting the top line. Given in retail markets, these pricing cycles tend to be quite shallow, what's your kind of expectation about when you think the industry will see rate adequacy and when you think this kind of level of pricing is going to normalize in terms of the growth rate and pricing? Thank you. Thank you very much, Farooq. The first question, I will tell you both for Marco and Giulio, feel free to answer both. Cristiano, the discounting question is for you, while the third one is for Giulio. Hi, Farooq. Thanks for all the questions. I would say I think that most of our focus is on our traditional business. We know that everywhere we are mainly a retail and SME group, mainly focused on non-motor in Europe. Therefore, you should think our focus is in enlarging the product density in a way in our customer base on these traditional type of products. We are talking about the protection for the family, the protection for the house, the protection for the small businesses, these kind of things. Now, on top of this, you remember in Venice we discussed some pocket of growth where we want to really be focused. We discussed our focus on health. We discussed our focus on protecting the development of climate in the medium term. We discussed the focus on making sure that the SME completely understood the risk that they have on cyber. I think overall we are capturing these type of niches that are growing. Maybe health is not a niche because it's already very big, but it's still developing. You should think our main business is developing on our core capabilities and core products. Just to give you an idea, our non-motor is still developing at a much better combined ratio, and I always have in mind attritional and discounted with our NATCAT. It is running at a better combined ratio than motor, clearly, about 62%, and our motor is still in the 70% range. This is the type of product we are focusing on. Yeah, maybe I could catch a question about the outlook for retail. I would say the following. As I was saying before, for 2025, we still expect the earned premium to be ahead of the risk premium, and this is in motor. In non-motor, it is more or less a match. I would expect that as we go into 2026, most likely the earned premium and the risk premium are going to be in line. From that point of view, in general, on the portfolio, I would expect that we are going to have this kind of situation. In some areas, we are still going to be able to get rate increases which are ahead of the risk premium. That is exactly in the portfolio like Spain, where we need to get some additional traction. What I would like anyway to highlight, if you take the numbers that we have right now for the quarter, you basically normalize our combined ratio for net cash. The combined ratio that we have in first quarter is 94.2. Let's say it is 94.5 for the sake of argument. This combined ratio is, in my opinion, the right level with quality at which we are running right now. Think about there can be still some improvement coming in 2025. As we go into 2026, 2027, the improvement will not come mostly from pricing, but will come from the productivity that we want to put in place and also from the cost- containment ratio. We are starting already from a level which is 94.5. Because of the price in this year and because of other levels, we have still some room to go. You remember that our target for 2027 was of a combined ratio and discounting 94.5. From that point of view, I would say that we had a very good start, and we feel very well positioned to deliver on our 2027 or even overdeliver on our 2027 ambition. Hi, Farooq. To complete on the discounting effect, I would like to say that I agree, first of all, with you that the start of the year is bringing a slightly higher discounting. If we just measure not in percentage, but if we go on the range due to the production and the amount of rates, I was telling you last time we were in the EUR 550 million-EUR 600 million. I would say that we are in the EUR 600 million plus range now with the actual rates as of today. That's excellent, very good. Thank you very much. Thank you, Farouk. Next question, please. Next question is from Stephen Haywood, HSBC. Please go ahead. Thank you very much. Just three quick questions for you. First one, on the asset management business, did you have any performance fees coming in as the asset management business in the first quarter? I saw there was a lot for Banca Generali, but I'm just going to clarify for the asset management business. Secondly, I don't know if I missed this in your introduction, but do you have any full-year guidance for the investment result of the non-life business? And then thirdly, you mentioned obviously surrenders not at a normal level in Italy yet. Are you expecting any potential variances or assumption changes to come later in the year for this? Thank you very much, Stephen. I would say all the three questions are for Cristiano. Hello, Stephen. First quarter, only on the asset management, excluding the EUR 34 million of performance fees of Banca Generali, posted EUR 2 million of performance fees in the asset management segment. The structure of the performance fees of the asset management is very different from the one of Banca Generali Wells. It is totally skewed in the last part of the year where the vast majority comes in the fourth quarter, just for you to be aware of. This is performance fees. Other form of non-regular fees like transaction fees can vary quarter to quarter according to the interaction. The most, let's say, volatile are the performance ones, which are skewed in the fourth. The second question related to the investment result guidance for the year, yes. As I was saying in the introductory speech, we confirm EUR 950 million with this environment and interest rates. It is confirmed. Third question, surrenders in Italy. We have experienced, as Marco was saying, a reduction of surrender in amount by 20%, which is in line from what now has been put in our CSM as well as in our new business value hypotheses, which were accordingly changed at the same logic of the CSM stock, which means that there are no deviations from what we have projected and budgeted. Excellent. Thank you very much. Good luck. Thanks to you, Stephen. Next question, please. Next question is from Fahad Changazi, Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Hello. Thank you for taking my question. Just very quick follow-ups. Regarding the new business margin guidance for the subsequent quarters of 5.25%-5.75%, if the SLAP is improved further, presumably that will sort of make us go to a higher end of the range. Could you also comment on what's happening with your commercial incentives in Italy and how we should think about that as we go through the year? Another question, please, is on the Natixis JD. Can you give any detail on the process and timeline of the Italian government's review? Thank you. Thank you very much, Fahad. The first question on the new business margin is for a new commercial incentives is for Marco, while at this stage there are no updates that we give regarding Natixis JD. Let me maybe build on the topic of lapses and guidance on new business margin. As I said at the beginning, lapses are going down, not at the level like, let's say, 2020, but there are business reasons for this. First, the interest rate environment is completely different, and therefore this has an impact on the type of lapses that we see. Second, also, the more we go on, the more the type of business we are selling matters because we have a much more hybrid stock of assets under management that we sold in the past, and therefore we do see that these have naturally a little bit more lapse, even because the type of product is a whole life. In the end, it needs to have this kind of trend. We do not expect that this is going back to 2020 numbers, but I would say the trend that we see is completely in line with what we expected during the year. I think we can confirm the guidance that we give in 5.25%- 5.75%. The other topic was on commercial incentives, right? Commercial incentives, as much as we are normalizing the situation, we are scaling back commercial incentives, and we are focusing a little bit more on quality volume coming in. This is the type of movement that we see in the Italian business at the moment. Okay. Great. Thank you. Thank you, Fahad. Next question, please. Next question is from William Hawkins, KBW. Please go ahead. Morning, all. Sorry, I've got three. I hope they're quick. Can you just help me understand a bit more the walk towards the EUR 950 million non-life investment income guidance, please? I'd be keen to know the Argentinian impact on the two first quarter figures. More importantly, if I just take EUR 164 million and multiply it by 4, that's EUR 656 million, which is EUR 300 million short of the guidance you're giving. If you can help me understand how we accelerate to the end of the year, please. Secondly, on the PVNBP that declined to EUR 17.3 billion this quarter, if we exclude China and France, what was the growth rate in that number, please? Can we assume that that growth rate continues for the rest of the year? Lastly, sorry if I'm being a nerd, but the balancing item in life, the balancing item between the CSM release and the insurance service result seemed unusually positive this quarter. My assumption is that all the other things, like risk adjustment, loss component, and the rest of it, net out to zero as a normal assumption. Is that correct? If it's not correct, can you just tell me how positive or how negative is all the other stuff? Because it felt to me like it was unusually positive this quarter. Thank you. Thank you very much, William. All the three questions are for Cristiano. I start with the third one, which is the easiest, and it is concentrated in the simple fact that we had a reversal of loss component because of the higher interest rate environment, which was accounting for EUR 47 million. Then we have positive experience variance, mainly related to the PAA business in our French activities of something of the order of EUR 29 million. These are the drivers which were bringing the support. The decline of PVNBP, if we exclude China, the China impact out of that would have been something like +5% number, I would say, doing it by heart. The walk from the EUR 950 million. In the first quarter, we posted in the P&C investment result something of the order of EUR 164 million. Do not forget that this is the joint effect of operating investment income and finance expenses. Excluding Argentina, this number would have been broadly the same because the effect on the investment result and the finance expenses would have gone down. To have a clean run rate, you should take the EUR 326 million of operating investment income without Argentina, multiply it times 4, add EUR 100 million of the operating investment income that we are expecting from Argentina, and add the EUR 150 million dividend distribution, subtracting EUR 600 million of ESIS. If you do that, math is not wrong to bring me to the EUR 950 million guidance. That's fantastic. Thank you very much. Thanks to you, William. Next question, please. As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one on your telephone. The next question is a follow-up from Michael Huttner, Berenberg. Please go ahead. Fantastic. I forgot my word. I like asking about cash. I was just looking at your presentation. Over EUR 11 billion is the target for the FIA plan, cumulative net holding cash flow. I just wondered if you can give us a feel for where we are relative to the plan and also what sort of level of one-offs. I know you talked about it in Venice, and also to Fabio Cleva, but a reminder would be lovely. Thank you. Yes, William. We are exactly in line with the plan, especially because when we presented the 2025 end of January 2025, the strategic plan 25-27, the decision on the remittance for 2025 was taken. There was much less uncertainty. I would expect potentially some positive second-order effect on the year coming from better than projected result, which will come. That is why I am saying that we are above 95%, but not at 100%, and some small pieces. Saying and projecting further, what pleased me in the results I have seen today, and I think in all what Marco and Giulio are telling you from the underlying business, is that these results, even in the life component you have seen, they are more and more driven by cash component elements. Because if you just take the P&C, the discounting cancels out with the unwinding of the ESI, and you are really posting an improvement which is fully driven by cash elements. This is a very solid mix to bring you a more than EUR 11 billion net holding cash flow cumulated. Fantastic. Thank you very much. Gentlemen, there are no more questions registered at this time. I turn the conference back to you for any closing remarks. Thank you, Operator. This concludes our first quarter 2025 results call. Thanks, everyone, for dialing in, and of course, the IR team remains at your full disposal for any follow-up. Enjoy the rest of your day. Goodbye. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over, and you may disconnect your telephone.