Good afternoon, this is the Chorus Call Conference operator. Welcome, and thank you for joining the Interpump Q1 2026 financial results conference call. As a reminder, all participants are in listen only mode, and after the presentation, there will be an opportunity to ask questions. Should anyone need assistance during the conference call, they may signal an operator by pressing star and zero on their telephone. At this time, I would like to turn the conference over to Mr. Fabio Marasi, CEO of Interpump. Please go ahead, sir. Thank you. Thank you. I'm Fabio Marasi, Interpump Group Chief Executive Officer. Good afternoon or good morning, depending on your time zone, and welcome to this Interpump Q1 2026 financial results conference call. Before starting, I would like to inform you that Elisabetta Cugnasca, former head of investor relations, recently left the company and that starting from June the first, the new head of investor relations will be Mr. Federico Pavesi, joining us after a long experience in CNH and Pirelli, to whom I formulate my best wishes for his future within Interpump Group. As usual, I must draw your attention to the disclaimer slide inserted in the next part of the presentation that I hope you are able to download from our website. I will start the Q1 2026 presentation as always, with past and future numbers. Past numbers. On organic basis, in the Q1 2026, we had a 2.2% organic growth, positive number for the fourth consecutive quarter, and a -2% EBITDA with a 60 basis point EBITDA margin dilution, mainly explained by the different contribution from the two divisions, with a stronger hydraulics and a weaker water jetting performance. On future numbers, both the results of the Q1 2026 and the sales evolution for the month of April are slightly better than our expectation. Considering the very uncertain geopolitical scenario, we prefer to confirm our 2026 organic sales guidance. That is, between -2% and +3%, hoping for more visibility and a better outlook in the future months. In terms of profitability, as usual in May, we are also providing more precise indications. Despite the headwinds coming from a tougher product mix, we are expecting an EBITDA margin for the full-y ear between 22% and 22.5%, confirming once again our most important goal and focus, that is to protect our profitability in every market environment. I will add more color on our 2026 expectation in the second part of my speech. Let's focus with more details on most important Q1 financial KPIs, sales, EBITDA and cash generation. On sales, the Q1 2026 confirm trends that have been ongoing for more than a year. The hydraulic division is recording a sequential and very comforting acceleration in demand, while water jetting is facing a very tough comparison base with the first part of 2025. This evolution is absolutely consistent with our expectations, summarized in 2026 budget. Once again, it is the clearest possible evidence of the beauty of the diversification that has always characterized Interpump Group's business. Going into details, we feel that the hydraulic division touched the bottom at the end of 2024, and that we should now expect a continuation of the sequential improvement that we have seen in the last four quarters, also during the remaining part of this year. Among the most important categories, agriculture, earth moving machine and construction are on fire with a double-digit growth, with others, for example, adapters, industrial vehicles, after several strong quarters were less positive. In the water jetting division, food and beverage, by far the most important market application and chemical, were the most affected by the tougher comparison basis with the same period of last year that we have already mentioned. Cleaning, the second most important application field, performed very well with a 14% organic growth in the quarter. In terms of geographies, the most important countries where we operate, Europe and U.S., recorded a very positive performance with a 7% organic growth. While the poor performance in Asia and in China in particular, was driven by the first part of the mega order that Hammelmann delivered in this area in the Q1 2025. Complementing the view for the quarter, it's important to underline that very good commercial environment, the very good commercial environment, both in terms of projects under discussion in the water jetting division and the strong order intake in the quarter, with a book-to-bill ratio above 1.5 x. Moving to EBITDA, I would like to come back to what I mentioned in my introduction. Q1 2026, we protect profitability, despite the important headwind coming from the different business mix, which was characterized by the stronger contribution from the relatively less profitable division, Hydraulics, in comparison with the Water Jetting one. The good sales evolution in the pure mobile Hydraulics application fields, the one that suffered the most in the past, allow to achieve good operating leverage in companies like Walvoil and Hydreco, and to improve overall performance in the companies that were hit the most during the past three years downturn. Offsetting in the meantime, the weaker contribution of companies, more focused on adapters of industrial vehicles. Switching to water jetting division, sales evolution, excluding the mega order delivered in the H1 of last year by Hammelmann in China, is confirming the good long-term trend seen in recent years concerning the higher attention paid by the industrial operators toward the environmental impact of their economic activities. The very interesting order intake in Q1 2026 and the number of projects under technical discussion in this field are just confirming these trends. Moving to cash generation now. Free cash flow in the Q1 went up by 10% from EUR 29 million to EUR 32 million, continuing the good improvement already reached in the last couple of years. It's important to focus on the different components. Cash flow from operating activities was aligned with the one of last year. While the 45% CapEx decrease from EUR 35 million to EUR 19 million more than compensated the trade working capital increase absorption explained by a stronger top line. Summarizing, another quarter of inventories, lower absorption, and CapEx reduction is a clear evidence that group is delivering its commitment to improve these KPIs after the extraordinary peak of 2021 and 2023. We believe therefore, that Q1 2026 cash generation result is satisfying and in line with our goal to repeat and possibly exceed the excellent levels of free cash flow generation of 2025. To complete the EBITDA overview, it's important to highlight that the group was able to offset the impact of U.S. tariffs, having increased prices or having recharged them to customers. The newly acquired companies did not have any dilutive effect. To conclude the discussion on profitability, I would like to draw your attention once again to the long-term stability of our EBITDA margin, which in my view, perfectly exemplifies the strength of our group. Thanks to our diversification and operational flexibility, we have demonstrated an excellence and resilience in margins in years marked by extreme volatility that few industrial companies can match. Moving now to acquisition. As usual, we would like to provide a short updating on M&A. No new acquisitions in this quarter, but several interesting ongoing discussions and negotiation with potential counterparts. We are very satisfied of the integration process of the three companies acquired in the Q4 of last year, namely Tutto Idraulica, Borghesani, and Farma, which are perfect examples of the add-ons opportunities that we are looking for, considering the perfect match between our industrial and commercial strategy, the financial profile of these companies, and respect of our M&A and financial criteria. Now, the usual overview on most recent market trends and 2026 expectations. April was characterized by a further acceleration of the top-line growth, thanks to the less tough comparison basis in water jetting and the continuation of the positive trends recently seen in hydraulics. Both the features of the projects under discussion and the very good order intake for the month, with a book-to-bill ratio once again close to 1.1, make us confident regarding the good evolution to be expected for this Q2 r of the year. After this necessary digression, let's go back to 2026 expectations. Q1 results and April sales evolution are a clear support for our February guidance that we are confirming today, despite the severe geopolitical tensions that are characterizing this world, and the very low visibility regarding the foreseeable future. On an organic basis, we are expecting a turnover variation between -2% and +3% and a positive perimeter change impact of around 2%, with reported sales in line with 2025, considering the negative FX impact that was around 3% in the first four months of the year. As usual, with higher visibility given by a quarter of reported data, we are adding the profitability guidance to the sales guidance. An EBITDA margin between 22% and 22.5% despite headwinds coming from a different contribution from the two divisions, with a stronger hydraulics and a weaker water jetting. That is, as you know, the most profitable division. In terms of cash generation, as explained before, Q1 results are clear evidence of the group's commitment to proceed in the normalization process of both trade working capital and CapEx. We confirm the goal to consolidate and hopefully improve the cash flow generation achieved in 2025 to a new record high number. If we are able to deliver these results in February 2027, we will be once again very proud, as they would once again confirm the two fundamental milestones of the group strategy, diversification and business model flexibility. We are now at your disposal for any question you may have. Thank you. This is the Chorus Call conference operator. We will now begin the question-and-answer session. Anyone wishes to ask a question may press star and one on the touch-tone telephone, to remove yourself from the question queue please press star and two. Please pick up the receiver when asking questions. Anyone who has a question may press star and one at this time. We will pause for a moment participants are joining the queue. First question is from Matteo Bonizzoni, Kepler Cheuvreux. Thank you. Ciao, Fabio. First three question, but very quick, if I may. First one is hydraulics. Flat margin in Q1 despite a 6.9% organic, so apparently no benefit from the operating leverage. Can you mention any specific reason in terms of mix, productivity, or other reason for this flat margin in hydraulic? Second is, you were mentioning a pretty solid book-to-bill. I don't know if you are referring, because I was not paying attention probably. 1.1 is for both division and because the question is Q2 will have a particular comparison, challenging comparison in, we know in water jetting. What is your expectation for Q2 in water jetting organic, just a range? Last one is on the margin guidance. 22%-22.5%. Q1, 21.9%, so a touch below. We know that typically, not necessarily this year, H1 is better than the H2. If Q1 is 21.9%, I would say that 22%-22.5% is something which require sort of explanation or maybe more details on how you are going to catch up to this range. Thanks. [Non-English content] Matteo. Regarding the flattish margin in hydraulics, it's important to comment on two different aspects. The first one, that is the one that I like the most, is the significant improvement in the performance of the company that suffered the most, the downturn of the last two to three years, and in particular, Walvoil and Hydreco. This positive evolution was offset by weaker results and weaker top line performance of companies working with adapters of industrial vehicles, and in particular, the American company, Muncie Power Products. That historically was characterized by a higher profitability and also by the different contribution from the American companies in general, due to the depreciation of the US dollar. Long story short, there is some different performance characteristics also within the two divisions. As you know, for example, in water jetting, Hammelmann is way more profitable than the average, and other companies are slightly less profitable than the average, is the same in the hydraulics division. Apart this short-term trend in the American companies, and in particular in Muncie, that is pretty significant in terms of size and contribution, we are satisfied of the better utilization rate of the internal manufacturing capacity in the companies that suffer the most in the downturn. Regarding the book-to-bill that I wanted to mention, in particular, with reference to water jetting, because clearly, water jetting is down in terms of sales because of the comparison that we were expecting very tough, considering the results that we had in the first two quarters of last year. What is important to underline is that we are not seeing any significant slowdown in the market in terms of new projects, in terms of opportunities, and also in terms of order intake. In the water jetting division only, the book-to-bill in the first three, four months was above 1.1. In hydraulics, was above one, but below 1.1. In any case, very positive and very significant. It is clearly too early to comment on Q2, but we will see how it will evolve, but April was good, and the order to be delivered in May and June are good as well. Clearly, in June last year, we had that mega order from Hammelmann that will be a tough comparison. In any case, we are very confident of the progresses that we are seeing in the market in terms of demand and order intake. Last question regarding the guidance on margin. We historically have been criticized for being too conservative, I believe that we are conservative once again. I don't believe that we have been optimistic or aggressive in this 22%-22.5% margin. I believe that considering how we expect that the turnover and also the contribution from the two division will evolve during the year, we believe that a number in this range is something achievable despite the 21.9% of the Q1 2026. [Non-English content] Thanks. Next question is from Domenico Ghilotti, Equita. Good afternoon. If a follow-up on the water jetting division. I'm trying to understand, because you are mentioning the 1.1 book-to-bill for water jetting. This means that we can expect probably some sequential improvement in phase in the Q2, but not far away from the EUR 200 million, if I remember well, in the Q2. What I say is, Q1 top line has been slightly down also compared to the H2 of 2025. I'm trying to understand why is the accelerating the order intake during the H2 was supported. A more general question on the cost inflation. What kind of actions are you taking, and when should we expect to see some contribution from this action? If you are seeing any supply chain disruption. For this time, you were mentioning the M&A pipeline without waiting for, let's say, a question specifically on that. If you can maybe add some color on what is the potential size of the pipeline. Okay. Regarding water jetting, it is correct to say that we are expecting a sequential improvement, but considering the very strong Q2 2025 and then the tough comparison base, I would say that the sequential improvement can be seen or will be seen from the third and Q4. Considering also that the second part of last year was weaker than the first part, the visibility is on the second part of this year. I don't agree technically on your comment regarding the top line deceleration, because in reality, it's just a lower increase in the Q1 in comparison with the growth rate that we had in the Q4 2025. For two reasons. The first one is that is another quarter of growth, second is that is another quarter of growth despite the first part of the mega order in China, the 2.2% is, in my mind, in my way of reading, a very positive number. Sorry. Probably I wasn't clear. Sorry. I was referring to the water jetting alone. The top line of water jetting alone, not the group level, the deceleration. One second. I will check it correctly. Yes. The decrease to - 6.something% in the Q1, 2026 is explained entirely by the first part of the order delivered in China last year. Okay. The second and more important part was delivered in June. That was made in two tranches. Regarding cost inflation, this is a very important topic. I don't believe that we saw many effect on the Q1 of the year, but this is becoming a very important topic in this Q2, in particular after the geopolitical tensions and the Gulf crisis in Iran and the consequent boom in energy costs. Then we are obliged, like everyone else in the market, to transfer to our customer these price increases through price surcharges or price list increase. This is something that we are doing, we have already done in some company, but once again, we will do it carefully and without any hesitation. This is the way in which the entire market is behaving once again. Regarding M&A, I've commented regarding the usual interesting ongoing activity. We have several dossier under analysis, mix in size, mix in terms of business, and mix in terms of geographies. I confirm that the environment is still pretty positive because considering the uncertainties that are characterizing more and more the economic environment, more and more operators are at least considering or starting to discuss potential opportunities of this size and merging their activities with a larger, more balanced, and more international group. In this case, Interpump, in some way, is a safe is a safe harbor for smaller and more risky companies. Thank you. [Non-English content] Domenico. Next question is from Alessandro Tortora, Mediobanca. Good afternoon to everybody. Hi, Fabio. The question is related, sorry, to the, you know, to your comment on the book-to-bill. Sorry, I got initially a level, like, 1.5. Maybe I was wrong, okay, collecting this data, because then you mentioned 1.1 for, let's say, above 1.1. Sorry, just a clarification on this data. The question is, can you comment a little bit about the trend by region? You mentioned in the past, you know, some uncertainty or volatility in the, let's say, American market, now you commented, let's say, positive performance. Just to have, let's say, a picture, let's say, by region, because I recall it that, you know, in the past, the regional performance was volatile quarter-over-quarter. Yes. I don't know how this 1.5 in terms of book-to-bill came out. Maybe it's the absolute value of the orders to be delivered that is above 1.1. The order intake in the first four months was around 1.1 in comparison with turnover. More in water jetting than in hydraulics. Okay. In terms of region, I agree with you, this is a very interesting topic, because to be fully transparent and completely honest, the very positive performance of the U.S. market is in some way surprising to me as well. Considering all that happened, and considering the depreciation of the U.S. dollar against the EUR on one side and the application of the tariffs on the other side, that made the cost in U.S. much higher than the previous year, I was expecting a softer market demand. Probably, and I'm referring in particular to hydraulics or to some application of the hydraulics market, the deceleration and the destocking activity was so severe in the previous two years that the market is recovering anyhow, despite these geopolitical tensions and the short-term consequences on these cost factors. Okay, thanks. Fabio, your initial comment was on the guidance which still assume all this negative sign as the lower end of your range. Considering your comment on all these sequential improvement you see in April and so on, the reason why you are not upgrading or at least excluding, let's say, the most negative, now the more negative part of your range is due to, I don't know, geopolitical context, and therefore you need some more months or quarters in order to reassess the outlook. That's your reasoning? This is absolutely correct. This is absolutely correct. Today, we are slightly more optimistic than a few months ago in terms of top line evolution and market demand trends. Considering all that is happening every day and considering the huge uncertainty that is characterizing this world, we believe that it's too early to remove the lower side of the range. To be honest, as commented, we are slightly above our expectation for these first several months of the year. Okay. Let's discuss on August 5. Okay. [Non-English content] [Non-English content] Alessandro. Next question is from Natasha Brilliant, UBS. Good afternoon, and thank you for taking my questions. I've got three. The first is coming back to your comments on pricing. You said that you put some pricing through in the Q1. I just wondered if you could quantify that, and what you think pricing will be for the full- year. Second question is just on capacity utilization, if you could give us the rates that you saw through Q1, and if that changed through the quarter as well. Lastly, on water jetting, obviously, we're cycling against a very big one-off project from last year. Do you have any visibility as to whether other such projects could be in the pipeline? I realize by nature they're one-off, but whether you've been having any discussions, if you're seeing any demand for similar types of projects that could come through, let's say, through, FY 2026. Thank you. Thank you, Natasha. Regarding pricing, considering the size and the magnitude of the price increase and surcharges that we are applying or we are considering to apply, I believe that at the end of the year, the price effect will be between 1% and 2%. Let's say 1.5%. It is too early to make definitive conclusion, but I believe that we will have more than 1% in terms of top line contribution. Regarding capacity utilization, considering the very fragmented picture and the situation in our group, I believe that it's very important to say that the capacity utilization in the companies that suffer the most, I've mentioned Walvoil and Hydreco and also some other minor companies, increased in a very significant way in the last two to three quarters. I believe that, focusing on the hydraulics division, being the water jetting more flexible and more reliant also on outsourcing, I would say that in the hydraulics division today, the capacity utilization is something like 95%, with some company that is in better shape and some other that is still suffering a bit, waiting for some further quarter of recovery to join the 100% utilization. Of course, will be very beneficial in terms of profitability. Regarding water jetting big projects, I mentioned the positive environment and the positive long-term trend of demand in this, in this world, in this business. What I can confirm is that we have many different projects underway and under discussion. No one so big and so important, such as the one of last year in China, but many projects in the millions, many projects that are relevant. What is important to say is that the long-term trend of higher attention and higher sensitivity of the industrial world operator toward a more sustainable industrial approach is continuing, and we believe it is today and will be beneficial to our technologies and our projects within a long-term perspective. That's very clear. Thank you. Next question is from Michele Baldelli, BNP Paribas. Yes. Good afternoon to everybody. I hope you are hearing me well. I have three questions. The first one relates to the Section 232 of the U.S. tariff duties, the one changed on the 6th of April. If you can give us some color on what kind of impact that can have on your business. The second relates to the trend of the water jetting division, specifically concerning the Far East and Oceania. I've seen in Q1 a strong drop, so I was wondering if last year also in Q1 you had specific big contracts, because as far as I remember, the Chinese contract was impacting Q2, but I may be wrong. If you can give us some color also on this. Finally, impacts from the Middle East. Did you suffer from some deliveries that could not happen because it was not possible to send certain pumps in the Middle East? What has been the impact from this crisis there, given that I imagine some projects in the petrochemical needed also probably some process pumps and so on. Thank you. Yes. Thank you. Thank you, Michele. Regarding the Section 232 of the tariffs, I would like to say that we have had around EUR 6 million impact in the Q1 of the year that has been completely transferred to our customers. There is a huge debate in this day regarding the reimbursement of the tariffs and how this will be managed by the U.S. administration, with the companies that paid as importer of goods, and the customers that have been paying, passing through these amounts. It will be a very important topic, I believe, of the second part of this year, the way in which this reimbursement will be managed, and the consequence on everybody P&L. I believe that it will be very clear that we can reimburse or like everybody else, can reimburse only the amount of money that will be received back by the U.S. administration. Today, what we have paid is what we have transferred to the customers. Regarding the Chinese mega order that we have been debating a lot, these orders, these mega projects were delivered in two moments. The first one, the smallest one, was delivered in March last year, and the second in June last year. Then the impact or the tougher comparison base, we characterize the first and the Q2 of this year. Middle East crisis and impact. Clearly, we had several impact, direct and indirect. Some projects, some business, some CapEx is being postponed in the region, and this is a direct impact. On an indirect point of view, clearly the effect are tougher and more important because the delivery time from Asia to Europe has increased. The cost of transportation has increased a lot. This is something that we are managing also thanks to our higher than normal level of inventories. It's something that is affecting or has affected the day-by-day management of the business and the protection of the profitability. One of the reason why we are obliged to increase price or to apply energy cost surcharges is also because of this Middle East crisis that is affecting the transportation of goods from Asia to Europe and vice versa. Thank you very much. Next question is a follow-up from Domenico Ghilotti, Equita. I have a clarification, then a question. The clarification is just to be sure that I understood properly on the water jetting trend. You said around 1.1 book-to-build for Q1, and you were mentioning that in April, sales were positive in water jetting. Clearly, we will have the very tough comp in June. We have to consider the further quarter clearly to have this comparison. Then the question is on your view on the opportunity of the share buyback. You have started. We have seen already some share buyback programs with the stock down also today, and your mood and your speech quite more constructive. I wonder if you are more willing to use this lever as an opportunity. Yes. Regarding water jetting, the book-to-bill to 1.1 was in April. The positive organic growth in April is very comforting because it's, in some way, a like-for-like comparison. It's very comforting to us as well. Clearly, we have this June very positive month. We had this June 25 very positive month. In any case, without concentrating too much on short-term or monthly results and performance, what really matters is the continuation of the long-term trends of better penetration of our technologies and long-term higher attention to a more sustainable industrial activity world in terms of efficiency, in terms of water consumption, energy consumption. We are very, very well positioned with our products, our components and our systems. To have a positive demand and positive evolution of top line coming from these trends. Regarding buyback, you note and you mention what we have already done. We have bought in the last couple of months 1.3 million shares, investing EUR 45 million, EUR 47 million. Clearly something that considering also the very depressed level of the share price, we are considering to do again in the short term. Clearly, our primary, as commented many time, way of investing our cash flow is acquisition and M&A in order to grow our top line and to grow the size and the meaningful of our group. We can do clearly both, considering how strong is our balance sheet and how strong is and will be our cash flow in 2026. Thank you. Next question is from Michele Baldelli, BNP Paribas. Yes. Thank you. Sorry, we could not end the call without a question about M&A. Can you give us some more color, or is it something steady state compared to the last messages you gave, just to have an update? Thank you. I would say that steady state is a good way of describing. We are very focused. We understand the opportunity because in uncertain time, strong companies and strong groups such as Interpump may find very good and interesting opportunity at the right prices. We are positive on the outlook for the remaining part of the year, but also with a midterm perspective. Thank you. As a reminder, if you wish to register for a question, please press star and one on your telephone. For any further questions, please press star and one on your telephone. Next question is from Fraser Donlon, Berenberg. Hi, Fabio. Fraser here from Berenberg. Thanks for the presentation. Sorry to ask a question which has been asked in different ways already, but I wrote down that you said the book-to-bill in water jetting was, in Q1, was 1.5 x. If it was EUR 160 million of revenue, that would imply orders around EUR 240 million. Did I just mishear that? Probably I said 1.15. Okay. Clear. Thank you. That was my question. Appreciate it. Okay. Thank you, Fraser. For any further questions, please press star and one on your telephone. Mr. Marasi, there are no more questions registered at this time. Thank you. Thank you everybody for participating today. We will update, and we will meet again on August the fifth for the Q2 and H1 results. Thank you so much. Ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining. The conference is now over. You may disconnect your telephones.