Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen, welcome to the Conference Call of Intesa Sanpaolo for the presentation of the full- year 2022 results, hosted today by Mr. Carlo Messina, Chief Executive Officer. My name is Razia, I will be your coordinator for today's conference. At the end of the presentation, there will be a question- and- answer session. To enter the queue for questions, you can please press star one and one at any time. You will hear an automated message advising your hand is raised. To withdraw your question, you can please press star one and one again. I'll remind you that today's conference is being recorded. At this time, I would like to hand the call over to Mr. Carlo Messina, CEO. Sir, you may begin. Thank you very much. Welcome to our 2022 results Conference Call. This is Carlo Messina, Chief Executive Officer, and I'm here with Stefano Del Punta, CFO, and Marco Delfrate and Andrea Tamagnini, investor relations officers. Today, I'm going to walk you through a very high-quality set of results. We are delivering on our commitments, and for 2022, we will distribute cash dividends of EUR 3 billion, and this is equal to a 70% payout ratio as promised. In the next few days, we will launch the second tranche of the share buyback, bringing the total additional distribution to EUR 3.4 billion. Full- year net income was EUR 5.5 billion when excluding provisions for Russia derisking. This is well above our 2022 business plan target. Even including Russia derisking, net income was EUR 4.4 billion, the best result in 15 years and well above the guidance we gave following the invasion of Ukraine. Looking ahead to 2025, the final year of our business plan, we expect to comfortably exceed our EUR 6.5 billion net income target. This is thanks to the boost from interest rates, our resilience as a 0 NPL and a 0 Russia exposure bank, and our flexibility in cost management and our leadership position in wealth management, protection and advisory. As we have proven again and again, we will over-deliver on our promises. Now let me turn back to 2022. Despite the difficult macro environment, we delivered the best ever year for operating income, operating margin and gross income. Q4 was the best quarter ever for revenues, with a strong acceleration in net interest income. We paved the way for this year with very conservative provisions, setting aside EUR 1 billion as overlays and to favor derisking. I also want to draw your attention to the 110 basis points increase in our capital position in just one quarter. When we reduced risk-weighted assets by rationalizing positions no longer EVA positive and disposed of assets that were no longer efficient capital-wise. This is one-off exercise, does not affect future profitability and gives us a strong buffer against future regulatory headwinds. No additional risk-weighted assets reduction is needed. Our common equity ratio is up at 13.5%, including the impact of the transaction of share buyback. It is almost 15%, including DTA absorption. It is close to 13% this year and above 13.5% in 2025, and above 13% post Basel IV. 14% considering DTA absorption. This does not take into account any additional distribution that will be evaluated year by year. We confirm our business plan target at Common Equity Tier 1 ratio above 12%. Rewarding shareholders while maintaining a solid capital position is embedded in our DNA and remains our priority. Derisking continued with a EUR 4.6 billion reduction in gross NPL and a massive decline in Russia exposure that is now below 0.3% of group exposure, and we will continue to work to further reduce the limited remaining exposure. This confirms our commitment to being a zero- Russia bank and a zero- NPL bank. In this respect, I want to say that the asset quality picture remains benign, with the lowest ever NPL inflows and the lowest ever NPL stock and ratio. I'm proud of our results and thank all our people for their hard work. Execution of the 2022 business plan is proceeding at full speed, with all initiatives well underway. We continue to invest strongly in technology and innovation, and despite these investments and very high inflation, we still managed to reduce costs. Let me also say a few words on the overall macro situation that has recently improved. I remain positive for two reasons. First of all, the Italian economy will quickly recover already in 2024, even if there is a slowdown this year. Secondly, our bank is fully equipped to face challenging environments for multiple reasons. We are delivering excellent operating performance, and we have a best-in-class risk profile with the NPL stock that is a fraction of the past and a rock-solid capital position. Of course, we are very sensitive to the fact that many families and businesses are struggling, and we remain committed to supporting them. As ISP, we are providing EUR 400 billion in lending to the real economy, not to mention our many social and climate initiatives, which we are stepping up. Because we take care of our people, we provided a one-off contribution of nearly EUR 80 million to mitigate the impact of inflation for our people. Now, let me provide the highlights of the full- year results. Slide number one. In 2022, we delivered high-quality earnings with net income of EUR 5.5 billion when excluding Russia, de-risking exceeding the business plan target. We achieved the best ever year for operating income, operating margin, and gross income. Q4 was the best ever quarter for operating income. Net interest income is accelerating. We reduced costs. We reached one of the lowest NPL stock and ratios in Europe. We massively reduced our exposure to Russia. Capital position is, and will remain rock solid. We are paying EUR 3 billion in cash dividends. The second tranche of the share buyback will be launched in the next few days. Slide number 2. In this slide, you can see the evolution of net income, and in 2022, we delivered the best net income of the past 15 years. Slide number 3. While delivering a record high net income, we set aside EUR 2.6 billion pre-tax to become a zero- Russia exposure bank and to succeed in the future by further strengthening buffers. Slide number 4. On top of that, in Q4, we put in place managerial actions to reduce the risk-weighted assets to enhance value creation, further reinforcing capital to absorb any regulatory headwinds. This one-off reduction refers to positions EVA negative or no longer justified in relation to absorbed capital, and does not affect future profitability since the asset disposed can be easily replaced in the new interest rate environment with higher yielding assets, with low or zero- risk-weighted asset absorption. In fact, we have already started. Capital ratio will remain well above the 12% business plan target, which we confirm, not considering any additional distribution that will be evaluated year by year. We clearly have an excess capital. Slide number 5. In this slide, you can see that once again, we are delivering on our commitments with a tailwind from interest rate increases, providing a clear and strong upside to the EUR 6.5 billion net income target for 2025. Let me take you to slide 7 to provide some color on the P&L. Slide 7. In 2022, net interest income grew by 20%. Commissions were resilient, and the decline is due to negative market performance. Insurance income reached the record high, also thanks to strong growth in non-motor P&C revenues. Operating costs decreased. We have been conservative in provisioning, allocating EUR 1.4 billion for Russia and EUR 1.2 billion as overlays and to favor derisking. Net income was more than EUR 6 billion when excluding costs concerning the banking industry and provision for Russia, Ukraine. Slide number 8. Looking at Q4, we delivered high-quality operating performance. Net interest income was up almost 60% year-on-year, and commission were up 3% on a quarterly basis, despite the absence of performance fees. The total contribution from net interest income, commission, and insurance income was up 16.5% on a yearly basis and over 14% quarterly, demonstrating the resilience of our business model. In light of strong core revenue performance, we didn't push on profits from financial assets that were also affected by the disposal of low-yielding capital inefficient assets. Revenues were up 13%, best quarter ever. We booked a one-off contribution of EUR 36 million for IS people, in addition to the over EUR 40 million in Q2 to mitigate the impact from inflection. We have been very conservative in provisions and booked EUR 1 million as overlays and to favor derisking. Q4 net income was EUR 1.1 billion. Slide number 9. In this slide, you can see the strong acceleration of net interest income up to EUR 700 million in one quarter and EUR 1.1 billion compared to the Q4 last year. Rate increases are a strong upside for us. Net interest income will grow by EUR 2.5 billion this year, assuming one more Euribor reaching an average of 2.5%. Slide number 10. In this slide, you can see the net interest income growth on a quarterly basis and yearly basis was driven by the commercial component. Slide number 11. Customer financial assets were EUR 1.2 trillion, with a EUR 26 billion increase in Q4. We had a EUR 4 billion positive net inflows in asset under management on a yearly basis. Wealth management will continue to be an important driver for growth in the future. Our well-balanced and efficient business model give us a clear competitive advantage. Slide 12. We continue to be very effective at managing costs, down 0.4% in 2022, despite very high inflation. Depreciation is up as we keep investing for growth, especially in technology. Slide 13. Thanks to massive deleveraging, the net NPL ratio is the lowest ever at 1%, already achieving the business plan target. We reduced NPL stock by EUR 4.6 billion on a yearly basis. We had the lowest ever NPL inflows. Let me remind you that we have reduced the NPL stock by EUR 54 billion since the peak in 2015. Slide 14. As a result of this impressive deleveraging, NPL stock and ratios are among the best in Europe. Slide number 15. Our underlying cost of risk 30 basis points in line with being a zero- NPL bank. We have been conservative with provisions, and in Q4 alone, we booked EUR 1 billion as overlays and to favor the risking, paving the way for the future. Slide number 16. As you can see on this slide, NPL coverage continued to grow in Q4. Slide number 17. We achieved an impressive Russia derisking. This exposure decreased further in Q4 and is now very limited and high quality. Let me take you to slide 18 to give you some color on the capital position. Fully phased-in Common Equity Tier 1 ratio is 13.5%, up 110 basis points in Q4. When we reduce the risk-weighted asset by rationalizing position no longer EBA positive. Let me be clear. This one-off exercise in terms of size does not affect profitability and gives us a strong buffer against any regulatory headwinds. The capital ratio already takes into account EUR 3 billion in dividend and the 60 basis points impact from the second tranche of the buyback. It does not include the 125 basis points of additional benefit from DTA. Slide 19. Shareholders are not the only one benefiting from our performance. Intesa Sanpaolo has contributed broadly to society, and our excellent performance allow us to create sustainable benefits for all stakeholders. Slide number 21. In addition to delivering excellent results, the people of Intesa Sanpaolo are working at full speed across all the industrial initiatives of the business plan. In the past 12 months, we have launched all the business planning initiatives, of which 70% are ahead of schedule when compared to our 22 targets. This year, we will launch Isybank, our digital bank, to serve about 4 million existing clients who already choose not to use our branches. You can go through the details of the ongoing initiatives in the next 11 slide. On slide 30, you can see our leading ESG position in the main sustainability indexes and rankings. For the sake of time, let's move to slide 35 to see why ISP is well- equipped to succeed in a challenging environment. Slide 35. Italian economy. The Italian economy is strong. Thanks to solid fundamentals, world-leading household wealth and resilient SMEs. Lower energy and commodity prices will help ease inflationary pressures. As inflation slows, the economy is set to re-accelerate. Slide number 36. As you can see in this slide, ISP is far better equipped than European peers, thanks to our best-in-class risk profile, rock-solid capital position and the resilient and efficient business model. Slide 37. Let me now recap the key points demonstrating how ISP is well- equipped to further succeed in the future. Our resilient, diversified and profitable business model. We remain a wealth management protection and advisory leader with fully owned product factories and EUR 1.2 trillion in customer financial assets that can succeed in any interest rate environment. Our capital position is and will remain strong. We cut our exposure to Russia to below 0.3% of group customer loans. We will continue to reduce it. Zero- NPL bank status already achieved. Net interest income provides a strong tailwind. In Q4 we paved the way for the future with very conservative provisions. Costs are down despite inflation, demonstrating our high strategic flexibility in managing costs. The execution of the business plan is proceeding at full speed. Slide number 38. To finish, let me turn to the outlook. In 2023, we foresee significant operating margin growth, which will be driven by solid growth in revenues, thanks in particular to net interest income, together with a continued focus on cost management. This, coupled with a strong decline in loan loss provisions, will enable a growth in net income well above the EUR 5.5 billion reached in 2022 when excluding Russia. These forecasts are based on conservative assumption. We confirmed the 70% payout ratio. In the next few days we will launch the second tranche of the buyback. The outlook for this year means that we will continue to reward our shareholders for ISP and me personally, while maintaining a strong, solid capital position. This year, subject to shareholders return at least EUR 5.3 billion, taking into account the dividend we will pay in May. The second tranche of buyback and the interim dividend that as usual we pay in November based on the net income guidance for the full year. Common equity ratio is expected to be close to 13% this year, taking into account regulatory headwinds and with no additional actions to reduce risk-weighted asset. Above 13% in 2025 post Basel IV, 14% taking into account the benefits from DTA absorption. All these levels of capital ratio does not consider any additional distribution that will be evaluated year by year. It is clear that we have a significant excess capital, not only in the short term, but also in the medium- long- term. As already said, the EUR 6.5 billion net income target in 2025 will be comfortably exceeded. As proven again today, Intesa Sanpaolo is an unstoppable delivery machine, and this thanks to all our people into a strong, long-standing and cohesive management team. Thank you for your attention, and I'm now happy to answer your question. Thank you, sir. As a reminder to ask a question, you will need to press star one and one on your telephone and wait for your name to be announced. To withdraw your question, please press star one and one again. You are kindly invited to ask no more than two questions to leave room for the other participants. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our first question. The questions come from the line of Giovanni Razzoli from Deutsche Bank. Please ask your question. Your line is open. Good afternoon. Thank you for taking my questions. I have two basically. Can you share with us what are the regulatory headwinds that you expect in 2023? In the last Conference Call, you mentioned 45 basis points. There has been a little bit of noise on the market. If you can share with us what is an updated figure down there and to what they are related. My second question is on the guidance for 2023, whereby you target a net income well above EUR 5.5 billion, which is basically the same level of 2022 excluding Russia, but then you have a EUR 2.5 billion of higher NII. My reading is that 2023 could be well above EUR 6 billion rather than well above EUR 4.5 billion, and I think I'm conservative. I was wondering whether I'm missing some points or whether my, you know, understanding here isn't correct? Thank you. Do you want me to enter into the presentation for the Q1 results of 2023? That's the reality. I have to tell you that starting from home because if you want to deliver a surprise, you are just firing the surprise. I understood the market now need to have more comprehension on our outlook. That's a new, the new style of the European CEO to give super bullish guidance in order to increase the share price. I will give you the view line by line, so you can create your view on what can happen. Remaining with my statement in the presentation that was also driven by the fact that if we accelerate and give, I think, formally figures on 2023 that are close to the level of the 2025 business plan, we will have to change the business plan. Believe me, I think that there will be a timing in the virtualization of net interest income. We will have to give the market the new figures because the increase is so massive that we will have to disclose to the market. The real point is that we need to have a clear and stable view on the expectation of the central bank. Today there is a trend of increase of interest rate, but with some not completely clear view from the ECB. The real point for me is 2025. 2023, when I will give you all the detail line by line, you will have your probably your expectation, not giving from me, but your expectation confirmed. The real point for me is the need to update the 2025 figures because today are really too much conservative in consideration of the new scenario. Let me give you some color. Just to avoid all the next 20 questions on the outlook. I want to enter line by line, and as usual, I will give a transparent view on all the figures. I will elaborate on the regulatory headwinds and our expectation on risk-weighted assets. Starting from net interest income, we think to be in a position to have a strong increase in net interest income, EUR 2.5 billion is absolutely the figures that are in the end of the group is already embedded. The presentation of Christine Lagarde of yesterday. That's the starting point of the 2023 conservative assumption, because I'm thinking that interest rate can increase also on average during 2023. That's the first point. There will be strong growth in terms of net interest income. In commissions. Commissions, we do not have significant commissions. We have only EUR 30 million of commission related to liquidity, so-called liquidity accounts. Are mainly concentrated in corporate clients. We will reduce this EUR 30 million, but no more than this in terms of reduction of commission. Net inflows will be related to wealth management, will be positive and an increase in comparison to net inflows of 2022. Our expectation also is to have between flattish and increase in terms of commission. We will see what would be the market dynamic. That the reason why I prefer to wait until Q1 of the year to give a more detailed view on the final net income, but also commissions and the combination of commissions and insurance income will be from flattish to slight positive in our view. That's what we see. Especially in insurance business, we strong momentum for Property and Casualty business. That would be another driver of growth in our revenues base. On trading income, we think that we can have a reduction in trading income in comparison to 2022. That's our expectation. The indication to my people is not to accelerate on a yearly basis. This does not mean that we can have some quarter with very positive results. On a yearly basis, my expectation is to have a reduction in terms of of trading income on a yearly basis. Moving to the. At the end, the revenues will have a strong boost from all of these items. Moving to the cost side, the results in 2022 allowed us to have some contingency that we placed in 2022 in terms of cost base. The expectation for 2023 is that the cost base could be from flattish to slight increase depending on the level of inflation during 2023. In 2024 and 2025, again, we will have a significant reduction in terms of cost base. In the dynamics of the cost, we will have personal costs depending on the renegotiation with trade unions. Our expectation, in any case, is to have a reduction in terms of personal cost on an annual basis. In moving into the depreciation will increase because we will accelerate investment in so that's fundamental. In this quarter, we decided not to make any kind of specific presentation on technology at Isybank because, as happens today, all the attention is on capital comparison with other peers. It's only a way of not giving what I consider in reality strategic for the group. That is the technological upgrading of Isybank and the investment for the group. Depreciation will increase. Administrative expenses, we placed a portion in 2022 of these costs that we can have in 2023. We will see what could be the real dynamic of inflation. The expectation today is to have a slight increase, but with a capital budget that is above EUR 1.6 billion in 2023. It's an amount that it will be difficult to spend because it's really a massive amount of money. In any case, we maintain a significant contingency plan in order to reduce EUR 400 million and EUR 100 million the amount of cost also during 2023 if needed. That's the position on the cost basis. In 2022, on personal cost, we had an increase in cost related with incentive schemes, so that the reason why cost increased in the personal cost. At the end, all the dynamics for 2023 is for a potential reduction of cost. Looking at provisions, the RAR rate of our cost of risk is 30 basis points, so related to the net inflows that we expect for 2023. We have considered 10 basis points for further disposal of non-performing loans. Our target is to try to remain, in any case, at 1% NPL ratio, net NPL ratio. Again, is not a compulsory target in the sense that 1% is the level is going to reach in 2025. We have flexibility also in terms of cost of risk without using overlays during 2023. Again, moving to gross income, making your own calculation, I will give you... I will not give you the final results, but the expectation is well above 5.5 billion EUR. That well above is a figure that you can decide by yourself. I will give the more precise figures during 2023. We need also to have this consistency with the business plan, so maintaining the level of net income of the business plan because we decided to give full transparency on our capital ratio. The only way to give a capital ratio that is consistent also with the information of the board of directors, because in Intesa Sanpaolo, we used to give a significant role also to the board of directors. If they approve the business plan, they have figures on business plan, we do not change on a quarterly basis, the dynamics of our figures. The estimates that we made on capital ratio are based on the figures of the original business plan. That's for outlook and profitability. I'm completely assured that our outlook is an outlook that is really conservative. In the Q1, you will have all the evidence of our delivery during 2023. I don't like this approach of giving fantastic outlook and then creating expectation just for the sake of short-term increase in the share price. We are only looking at the medium- long-term value of Intesa Sanpaolo as usual. Our estimates, so the estimates that I gave to you are absolutely more than feasible. Moving into the regulatory headwinds, the point of our risk-weighted assets. We gave to the market 45 basis points as the impact related to regulatory headwinds. In reality, the work that we made with the ECB, the final results of these analysis on our internal model will bring to an impact that could be close to 70 basis points. That will be an impact that we will take in a significant portion in the Q1 of this year, another part in the Q2. That should be the final impact for us of all the regulatory headwinds related with our internal model. Is large corporate model. It's the area of large corporate, mainly investment grade, large corporate, but that's the impact that we will have in 2023. In 2023, we will have another 20 basis points impact related to IFRS 17. Through the analysis that we made, we had the possibility to increase net income of the insurance business, and with a deduction from net equity, we will have increase in net income in the next years of. Due to this strong capital position, we decided to place in the Q1 2023 also this impact. These are all the figures related on the negative. We will have a growth in terms of risk-weighted assets related to business. That could be in the range of 30-40 basis points, depending on the kind of growth that we would be possible to have during 2023. On the other side, we will net retain the income and the recovery of DTAs. That's leading more or less at 13% during 2023. I have also to add that we had, in any case, further room to reduce risk-weighted assets during the business plan. That's our expectation. In terms of the next regulatory headwinds, we think that with 2023, we should end the impact for us. This is not an impact coming from the so-called return to compliant through the negotiation with JST, but this is really the results of the inspection of the ECB in the company. It's the final end of the regulatory headwind process with the ECB. At the same time, on Basel IV, our estimate today is to have an impact within 60 and 65 basis points, and this is confirmed with further analysis that we made this year and this quarter. We can confirm that also looking in Basel IV, we will be in absolute condition to have a capital ratio above 13% in 2025 post Basel IV, remaining with roughly 100 basis points of DTAs that can be recovered in the next three years after the entering of Basel IV. That's the capital position. This means that we have a clear and strong excess capital, not only in 2023, but in the medium term. And these, all these estimates are conservative. We decided to have very conservative approach in all the estimates. That's all. I think that we can close also the meeting for today. Thank you for the conference. Sorry, I'm joking. I'm joking. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question comes from the line of Antonio Reale from Bank of America. Please ask your question, your line is open. Hi. Good afternoon, everyone. It's Antonio from Bank of America. I have 2 questions, please. One on capital returns and one on deposit betas, please. On capital returns, you have the largest dividend payout in Europe at 70% of earnings. I don't think you had budgeted any additional buybacks in the business plan other than the one you're doing. I think also you don't have any rate hikes, and as you've hinted, the business plan was really from a different world in this context. My question is, where do you stand? You said you would assess additional distribution on an annual basis. That's very clear. How are you thinking about your payout and the mix between dividends and buybacks going forward from here? That's my first question. Secondly, on deposit betas, you're market leader in Italy. I'd like to understand what you've assumed for deposit beta in your EUR 12 billion NII figure for this year, what you're seeing from competition and from your client base when it comes to deposit pricing, and what would you expect for the rest of the year? I've seen some of the banks are starting to lower current account fees, which I guess is the first natural step. I'd like to hear your thoughts on the moving parts. Thank you. Thank you, Antonio. Moving, from, starting from the beta, so we can move, in this. It is clear that we are the market leader in Italy, so there's no other bank in a position of Intesa Sanpaolo. Our beta is completely different from the one that other players have in the market. In any case, we decided to have a very conservative stance in our approach for us, that is to have a beta between 35% and 40%. Consider that the beta for the families today is close to 3%. We are talking about something that is absolutely negligible. In, during 2023, it is clear that if you want to make a forecast and give an indication, much better to be conservative, but it is different to have a market share of 10% and have a market share of 30% in a country. At the same time, also, the kind of correlation that we have between deposits, asset under management, insurance product, and mortgages is unique in Europe. It is clear that we have a position with our clients that maintaining the attitude of moving into the interest of the clients, but this allow us to propose a mix of different products that can maximize also the value for the bank. But in any case, on net interest income. If you look at the past, if you look at the period in which the interest rate were so negative, we were able, we had such a significant negative impact, because we had such a strong deposit base. At the same time, being a wealth management and protection company is also a point of strength in this phase, because you are able to manage in a better way the position of the client and also the different attitude of the clients. I have to tell you that I'm talking about the obviously retail and private banking clients. Corporate clients from this perspective are not so strategic of Net Interest Income generation from, on the markdown side. Looking at capital, the position of the capital position of the bank and the implication of this new environment is absolutely one of the point that I was mentioning in the better understanding of structural change in the market. With structural change in the market, we had such a boost in profitability, such a real boost in profitability, that we will have to consider the redefinition of the net income generation for the future. For the given time, also the capital ratio embedded in our future estimates. The one that we gave to the market is the minimum, so it's a very conservative approach. We have considered 70% payout ratio. In terms of excess capital redeployment, I think that it is absolutely fair to wait until the end of the year, not to give before the end of the year any kind of indication. It is clear that we have excess capital. We confirm, and due to the fact that we reached the 1% net NPA ratio in advance, because at the end of 2022, we are already at 1%. There's no other European bank in the same position. At the same time, we have very low level two, very low level three, and we have still reduced also in this quarter a portion of our exposure. That we are in a unique position to have real substantial excess capital also in comparison with 12%. 12% is really a level of capital in which already we have embedded an excess of capital in comparison with our risk-embedded portfolio of activity. We will have all the timing to decide on this excess capital. It is also clear that Price-to-Book will be another way of looking of what you can do with the excess capital because from a financial point of view, until the 1% Price-to-Book you can have positive from a financial point of view in realizing and delivering a share buyback, exceeding 1, there could be other way of giving back the capital through distribution of reserves and other instruments. For the time being, the decision on this will be taken at the end of 2023. My expectation is to be in a position to give very good satisfaction to our shareholders. The demonstration of this action and also the fact that I decided to give the clear trend 2023, 2024, 2025. There's no other player in Italy, in Europe, sorry, no other bank in Europe giving such a disclosure because the majority of the bank will have the impact of re-regulatory headwinds, the real regulatory headwinds, not the one that they are declaring as what they have transmitted to the ECB, but the real impact that we will have in 2024, and the real impact of Basel IV, in which a majority of European banks are telling we are calculating, we will be below the average. We decided to have a clear position also in the medium long term, and no other player made this clear and transparent demonstration of excess capital also for the future. We will decide at the end of 2023. I think that what we will give in 2023 is really such a significant amount in terms of remuneration. The, the cash dividend that we will pay in May, the share buyback, the cash dividend that we will pay as an interim dividend in November. We do not need, and we are not making any kind of competition with other European bank in terms of payment to shareholders. We think to have reached such an amount in which our shareholders can be happy of their remuneration. That's all. Very clear. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question comes from the line of Azzurra Guelfi from Citi. Please ask a question. Hi, good afternoon. Two question from me. One is on the capital trajectory that you have given. What is the rate assumption that you are including in that? Is it based on your EUR 6.5 billion net profit in 2025? Just to understand how much conservatism there is also in that, and I know that you have a 70% payout, but over the year that could add up. The other question is on the asset quality. You talked about something around the 30 basis point of cost of risk for 2023. What are the area of the loan book that you are, if any, a bit concerned about and that you are monitoring more closely? I saw the flows. I know the level of NPLs. It's just to understand what are you seeing on the ground, especially on the corporate and SME space? Thank you. Thank you, Azzurra. Your title in your analyst are always very smart. The capital position. As I told in making a clear view on what is my outlook, my outlook is a statement in which I want to make clear to the market that we have a significant upside, but we want to remain close in terms of communication to what we have in the business plan. What we have considered in the assumption embedded in the capital plan is absolutely the business plan. For 2025, we have EUR 6.5 billion. That is completely out of any kind of expectation that you can make today due to the fact that, if you consider 2.5 Euribor is absolutely conservative. If you consider 3% Euribor, there will be in one month what Christine Lagarde told to the market. There will be another upside of another EUR 500 million in comparison to the upside that we have on 2.5. We have, we are in a clear conservative position. You know that we are used to give guidance and information on the market only if we are pretty sure to exceed the guidance and the information. This is really conservative from our side. Looking at the cost of risk. The, the running 30 basis points cost of risk is more or less considering an amount of inflows that could be in line of 2022 with a limited growth in comparison. Asset quality today in Italy is absolutely under control. All the sectors are delivering in very good performance. It is clear that we are increasing the monitoring on the commercial real estate area. That's an area in which as in all Europe, there's a specific attention, but also a significant portion of overlays are placed on commercial real estate and on energy sector. That's that's the area in which we can consider to have attention, particular attention during 2023. As I told, we maintain also a buffer for increasing coverage in order to make disposal of non-performing loans in case of need during 2023. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question comes on the line of Delphine Lee from JP Morgan. Please ask your question, your line is opened. Yes, good afternoon. Thanks for taking my question. My first question is on the risk-weighted asset reduction that you've had in Q4, which is massive. Would you mind just elaborating a little bit because, you know, we understand it's not affecting profitability, but just wondering if there is some impact on trading that you have already front-loaded or anything that has been included in your NII guidance, anything that you could quantify just so we get a understanding of how that works because it's quite a big amount. The second question is on the overlays of EUR 900 million. It's an amount that you have continuously increased to be on the conservative side. Should we expect more to come in 2022, or is that embedded in your sort of 40 basis points cost of risk or is that EUR 1 billion kind of the maximum and you feel comfortable with that level? Thank you. Thank you, Delphine. Looking at the risk-weighted asset, I will give you all the details on what we had as an impact in the last quarter of 2022, and the impact that we will have in 2023. Looking at the trading income, we had a negative impact in Q4, EUR 70 million related to the disposal of the portfolio that was, that is mentioned in our slides. This is the negative one-off in a quarter related to this. We lost also EUR 20 and 30 million of net income in the last quarter of 2022. That's the majority of the impacts relating on this, the leveraging that we realized during the last quarter of 2022. You can add some, another EUR 10 million, EUR 20 million, but no more than this. Let's put in this way, it could be EUR 120 million-EUR 130 million of revenues. The run rate, during 2023, it is without the trading income, but is multiplying by 4 the net interest income. You are again in a range of EUR 100 million-EUR 125 million. At the same time, we started, and we are close to complete, actions in which we are increasing the government bond portfolios, placing in all to collect for an amount of EUR 10 billion is with a diversification in this portfolio. We will have 50% of the portfolio should be to double A and triple A, and the other portion is 30% Italy and 20% Spain. That could be a mixed portfolio. This will give us EUR 125 million-EUR 130 million of revenue. We compensated in terms of revenues through a zero- risk-weighted asset and also zero impact on capital in terms of action. At the end, the impact of profitability is really zero on our figures in 2023. Looking at the overlays, we don't think to be in a position to have the need to increase overlays. Because, our expectation is that the GDP in 2024 should increase in comparison to 2023. The need to have an overlays is more related with some uncertainty also connected with the microenvironment. The specific situation should lead us not to have the need to increase the overlays. In our figures, so in the 30 basis points, we have considered not to use these overlays. As I told you, and as I told also in previous answers, we decided also to have in our budget some room, 10 basis points in order to accelerate further de-risking, but no more increase in overlay comes. Thank you very much. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question comes from the line of Christian Carra from Intermonte. Please ask your question. Your line is open. Hi. Thank you for taking my question. The first one, clarification on the Cost of risk. You said 30 basis points plus 10 basis points, but you already reached the 0.1% net NPA ratio. I was wondering, look at your slide of your presentation, maybe you are discounting the Bank of Italy scenario with a plus 0.6% GDP 2023. I was thinking about if there will be a mild recession in 2023, how your number on Cost of risk could change. The second question is on fees. You gave a guide and similar to other players of flattish fees for $2,020, slightly up. On this point, I saw the... We saw the recent press articles on a potential wide ban on inducement for investment advice that could be proposed in April. If you could share with us your thoughts on that, what kind of impact could have on your P&L, if any, it will be useful. Thank you. I will start from the inducement. This regulation is mainly related to the counterparties that use third-party products. It is the not majority of the case of Intesa Sanpaolo because our point of strength is absolutely to have our own factory in asset under management, insurance business, and all the different areas. We have a limited portion in private banking. Obviously, that is not only the product of our group, but the impact on us is really negligible. The impact could be massive for other players that are using not their own factory. For us is absolutely negligible. Looking at the cost of risk, it is clear depending on the degree of recession. If we are talking about -3%-4%, we will have to enter into a completely different story and attitudes towards the cost of risk, but also overlays and other areas in terms of cost of risk. We will enter more in a Russia approach, in a Russia management crisis approach. We will have to assess the problem and place the needed provisions also for the future. In case of not a significant recession, we see only limited increase in cost of risk could be 10 basis points, 20 basis points, but not more than this. In that case, we will probably not complete another reduction in terms of the non-performing loans. We will use the provisions that we have considered in budget in order to cover increasing inflows in terms of inflows generation for the future. That's all. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question comes from the line of Benjie Creelan-Sandford from Jefferies. Please ask your question. Yes, good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for taking the question. I just had a question on net interest income. I mean, you've been very clear on the guidance for the outlook. Just in terms of understanding the dynamics a little bit better in 2022, is it possible to share with us your average loan yield and your average deposit cost at the end of 2022 and how that compares to the same time the previous year? I guess on the deposit side, what I'm really asking is, you know, what's your current beta versus your expectation going forward? Also what the TLTRO contribution was to 4Q NII. Just one quick clarification, apologies if I missed it earlier. I think just on the regulatory capital headwinds, you guided to 70 basis points on model updates. Was there an additional impact on IFRS 17 on top of that? If so, what was the number? Thank you. On the regulatory headwinds, we will have 70 basis points. That is already including the 45 basis points. That's all related to the internal model. It's mainly concentrating in large corporate internal model. On IFRS 17, we will have 20 basis points, and that will be all the regulatory headwinds that we will have for the next year. There will be no more regulatory headwinds in our figures. The, as I told, we will have also an increase in terms of risk-weighted assets coming from the business. At the same time, we will have a contribution from recovery of DTAs and net retained earnings. I don't know if I have understood your question on the regulatory end, please. I will answer on net interest income. That's perfect. That was exactly what I was looking for. Thank you. The client rates in our cost base has moved from the end of 2021 to the end of 2022 from 0.14% to 0.20%. That's the movement in terms of the cost base. Sorry, on the average side, you have asked also the average side. The that's on the total amount, considering also the medium term, also the wholesale is from 0.38% to 0.4%, so it's absolutely negligible, the movement on the cost of funding. At the same time, on the asset side, we move from a total of 1.6% to a total above, well above 2.24%. That would be the figures. You can elaborate, sorry, on this point with Marco Delfrate and Andrea Tamagnini. They will give you all the figures and all the detail that you want to share with them. Brilliant. Thank you very much. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question come from the line of Britta Schmidt from Autonomous. Please ask the question. Yeah, hi. Thanks for taking my questions. My first one will be on the 29 billion RWA decline. What was the thinking to undertake such a significant reduction now? Could you perhaps also explain as to whether the regulatory headwinds might have been higher had you still had these assets on balance sheet? My second question will be coming back to the potential inducement fee ban. I understand that as a largely captive business, you're a little bit isolated from that. Do you think that the impacts on other players could lead to a margin contraction in the asset management market overall that could potentially impact you? Thank you. Sorry, I didn't understand very well your question because the line was... there was a noise in the line, so I didn't understand very well. Could you repeat, please, the two questions? Yeah, sure. Can you hear me okay now? Yes. Now okay. Okay. The first question was just on the EUR 29 billion RWA decrease in the quarter, which is very substantial. What drove the timing of that to undertake this now? Would these assets have potentially increased the regulatory headwinds going forward if you still had them on balance sheet? The second question was regarding coming back to the potential inducement fee ban. I understand you're a captive business and you're differently impacted there, but if, let's say, it led to a decline in overall asset management margins in the sector for some of your peers, do you think there could also be an impact at Intesa coming just from the pricing of these products? Thank you. Okay, thank you. Looking at the EUR 29 billion reduction in risk-weighted assets, only a portion of these is connected with our activity in large corporates. We're talking about more or less between EUR 5 billion and EUR 7 billion risk-weighted assets. That portion could have been affected in case of remaining in our figures by the increase in terms of the model. The other portion is efficiency. Considering that we have already, as you know, a potential impact of 45 basis points, we originally planned to reduce in the Q1 for an amount in line with the management of 45 basis points. When we understood, working with the ECB that the impact could have been higher than this, we decided to accelerate other actions that could have been taken during the three years of the business plan. In any case, for us, it's business as usual, so it is only the dimension and concentration of action, but not something so complex to realize. In terms of asset under management and the potential impact on the yield, I have to tell you that, looking the kind of products, and especially the kind of strong franchise that we have with our clients, it is difficult to say that we can have a significant impact coming from some reduction in terms of commissions due to the fact that market is changing conditions. It is clear that if all the market will have a reduction of 1 percentage point, it is unbelievable that we will have no impact. If the impact could be 10 basis point, 20 basis point, 30 basis points, I have to tell you that our leadership is so strong that I don't see significant impact for us. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question come from the line of Andrea Vercellone from Mediobanca. Please ask your question. Yes, good afternoon. I have a question on insurance and one on DTA. On insurance, could you please remind us of the level of life, traditional reserves at Intesa Sanpaolo Vita, and the amount of unrealized capital gains or losses it has today, possibly before and after policyholders' interest? And linked to that, what is the lapse rate in Q4 2022 versus Q4 2021? On DTA, do you envisage any further DTA write-ups as per the one booked in, Q4 2022? Thank you. For instance, Andrea, you are so interested in our, in our insurance business that I will suggest you that we can fix a meeting not only with Frade, but also with Nicola Fioravanti, that is the Head of our Insurance Division. You can have all the figures and all the details that you need in order to make your analysis. We will set also next week if you want. You can have all the position of the insurance business made with our people and in complete transparency with all the people that are managing the business. We remain with a significant amount of potential capital gain in strong reduction with the past. This is obvious, but this remain an area in which we will have positive results. In any case, to give you all the detail, you can have clear access to my people within the organization. Looking at DDA, we maintain another tranche of these DTAs related with the UBI acquisitions that are in the range of EUR 300 million-EUR 350 million. We will decide the timing in which we will have this contribution to net income. Is not included in our outlook. Thank you so much. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question come from the line of Hugo Cruz from KBW. Please ask your question. Hi. Thank you. I'd like to ask about costs. Can you tell us, you know, you said flattish to up in 2023, and there were some contingencies built in 2022. First of all, I'd like to understand what kind of inflation assumption and ideally, staff cost inflation you assumed for 2023. You know, I think there's discussions with the trade unions and obviously you as the biggest bank perhaps might have a better insight into those discussions than the other banks in Italy. In terms of the contingencies, perhaps I was wondering if they are related to Isybank. It would be great if you could give us some insight into how much you've already invested into Isybank and how much you expect to do as well in 2023. I just wanted to understand if there are any kind of, you know, CapEx that was spent in 2022 that's not going to be there anymore in 2023. That's it. Thank you. On the cost base, you have to consider that in our budget, we have considered an amount of cost coming from inflation, and inflation has been considered on the average from scenario that could be between EUR 500 million and EUR 600 million. It is the inertial impact coming from the inflation. Then we made a number of actions in order to mitigate the impact, reducing close to zero the dynamics of the total cost. On the personal cost, we have embedded some figures, but due to the fact that we are in a process of negotiation with trade union, I prefer not to give any kind of indication. allow me to be on this point, just talking about the total cost of personnel that should be in reduction in 2023 in comparison with 2022. The contingency are for an amount that would be in a range between EUR 200 million and EUR 300 million. Moving the total dynamic of cost in negative territory, in case of need, obvious, but in case of such an increase in revenues, our cost income ratio will be so positive in terms of dynamics that we will analyze if needed contingency plan. On Isybank, we made an investment in during 2022 above EUR 100 million. The expectation in 2023 could be in a range of EUR 150 million, just for Isybank. We have all the technological infrastructure that we move into the bank because our project is then to transform the platform into the IT system of the majority of the retail activity of the group. All right. Thank you. Thank you. We are now going to proceed with our next question. The question come from the line of Andrea Lisi from Equita. Please ask your question. Andrea Lisi, your line is open. Yes, sorry, I was on mute. Thank you for taking my question. The first one is on what do you expect also based on what are observing on the evolution of the economy on in terms of loan growth going on, in particular for 2023, and also the deposit trajectory, considering on the one hand, your strength that you have with zero-ten yield, but also on the other hand, the fact that there is competition from others and also investment in short-term of short-term liquidity can be remunerative in some way. What do you expect on the deposit trajectory? The second question is on overlays. You accumulated overlays in the quarter. In case you do not use overlays in 2023, do you expect to release them or, do you think it is more safe to wait and see also what will happen for the following years? Thank you. On overlays, we will see. It will depend on the assumption related in particular on the commercial real estate activity and the energy sectors. That's the main reason to maintain these overlays. At the end of 2023, we will make all the analysis that we need in order to understand if there is room to maintain or not. Looking at the economy, the long growth is reducing the speed. It is clear that in the market, there is a lower demand in terms of loans. The company corporates clients are using their own deposits, that's the what's happening in the country. We see a strong position, in any case, strong financial position of the Italian corporate sector. We remain very positive on the corporate sector in our countries. Looking at deposit, the only area as I told is the corporate sector that is reducing some, in some portion, the amount of deposits. Families depend on the financial position, but remain an area in which families continue to maintain a significant portion of their savings. Thank you. We have no further questions at this time. I will now hand the call back to Mr. Carlo Messina for closing remarks. Please go ahead. Thank you very much. We think that our delivery has been very good. In the Q1 results, we will analyze all the areas and the more precise figures on the real outlook and not the estimates outlook for 2023. At the timing, we will be in a position also to give you more detailed information on the trajectory also for 2024. We hope to have all the information coming from the central bank on the future view on the real economy and the monetary policy of the ECB. At the timing, we'll be in a position to give full disclosure on for the future and the significant upside that we have for the future. Thank you very much. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes today's Conference Call. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you.