Morning, good afternoon, and good evening to everyone joining us for this particular call where we'll get to discuss our results for full year 2026. Indeed, we are really glad that you could make time to join into this conversation. My name is Caroline Wambugu. I serve as the Head of Financial Planning, Analysis, and Investor Relations here at Safaricom, and I'll be moderating the session. We'll take it that you did manage to at least get to listen to the conversation this morning when we released our results, whether from a live session or a post-recording. Having said that, we did confirm that the materials had been loaded onto our website, which we trust that you've been able to download and interact more with them. This particular session is to give you that opportunity to field your questions to the leadership, so that we can be able to address as many questions as possible. For that reason, we'll have a very short update from our Group CEO, Dr. Peter Ndegwa, followed by some remarks as well from our Group Chief Finance and Innovation Officer, Dilip Pal, who will speak briefly about our results that we announced earlier this morning, and then therefore pave way for a longer session to get to field your questions. Before we start, allow me to just request us to go through a bit of housekeeping rules. First and foremost, please join with your full names for ease of identification. Even when you post your question, just ensure that you have fully identified yourself and the organization for which you work for, just to make the conversations easier. At the same time, we want to encourage you to post your questions through the Q&A tab, and we will be able to read them out on your behalf for the leadership to be able to respond to that. We also do have a live transcript that has been made available. As we try to really keep to our promise on diversity and inclusion. For the comfort of anyone with hearing difficulties, please access this by clicking the CC tab on the bottom of your Zoom application, and you will be able to follow through with the conversations in a more comfortable manner. Should you require any other form of assistance that may not be directly related even to the subject matter of the call, you could write to us on the chat platform, and the investor relations and support team will be on hand to support you. With that, allow me to invite and indeed welcome our Group CEO, Peter Ndegwa, to please make his remarks. Peter, over to you. Thank you. Thank you, Caroline. Please confirm that you can hear me okay. Yes, we can hear you, Peter. You may proceed. Yeah. Yeah. Good morning, and also good afternoon and evening, depending on where you are calling from. Caroline has set out the context, so I won't kind of go through the intro. But there's enough of the management that is here today, so if you have any question, we can always deal with it. I will just very briefly speak about the results we announced today. This morning, as Caroline has said, we announced the results. We are very pleased with those results in the context of the shape of growth that we expected, the shape of the P&L that we are delivering, the health of the business that we are seeing in both Kenya and Ethiopia, and the progress in particular that we have made in Ethiopia in terms of resolving some of the more external issues that affect the business and gives us a pathway to sustainability in future. In a summary, I wanted to just take you through three things. One is just highlights or just summary of our read of where the economies are and or macroeconomic environment and how that influences and shapes our business. The second, in summary, just talk about the results themselves and then deal with any other issues that I may feel is appropriate at this stage. From a macroeconomic perspective, starting with Kenya, very stable parameters across inflation, GDP growth, interest rates reducing, stable currency. All the macro parameters look very much under control. However, we know that the country still faces fiscal and we are going into a Finance Bill period. Also the whole impact and the unknown impact on the Middle East war. We feel that stability is helpful, but we need to be very watchful of the impact of the fiscal pressure the government faces, but also the inflationary impact on customers as far as the Middle East war is concerned. We believe that customers therefore will continue to be under pressure, and we saw that in financial year 2026 from a disposable income perspective. Therefore we'll have to continue to offer more value. Segmentation is important and more value is important. The good news though from a regulatory perspective, we've now confirmed and secured our 25-year license, operating license. I know some of you will have asked in the past because it was extended to 2026, what happens after that? Now this has been confirmed, which is great news. Provides a level of predictability that is good for the industry. Not just for Safaricom, but for the industry. From a regulatory perspective, we know that there are still residual issues that we need to deal with, especially on the financial services side, whether that's Switch or the Also on the GSM side, the non-terrestrial regulatory framework is still not finalized in terms of satellite. Kenya is stable, but prone to risk, and also we are coming next year to an election year. On Ethiopia, again, stable macros. A high GDP growth. Inflation stabilized. Of course, all these things is subject to what happens with the impact on the war in the Middle East. The second is Ethiopia also has equally fiscal challenges that it needs to deal with, probably more externally dealt with through the whole program that they have, and we, I am sure will be able to update that at some point during the call. Then of course, from a security perspective, elections are coming in about a month. We believe that that's looking stable. From a security perspective, we continue to watch the space. From a regulatory perspective, we believe that, or we feel that there has been material progress, especially on the GSM side. You know, we have been at the issue of driving a more sustainable business. The regulator finally made the decision to allow the industry to compel the industry to make sure that we sell above cost, but also, we have clear infrastructure sharing guidelines, which have now been announced. We have benefited from that. From a pricing standpoint, we've decided to do it on a gradual basis rather than wait until the end. When you look at the results, you need to take them in the context of those two macroeconomic parameters. Summarizing the results, very pleased with the Kenya results. Double-digit growth across the board. Very good health of the business. Balanced growth, which is also quite important, and benefiting continued to be the powerhouse of the group. In Ethiopia, the benefit in H2 of pricing will show up or has shown up in positive results for Ethiopia. We have halved the loss in Ethiopia, which also, of course, has benefited the group. At a group level, we are very pleased with the profile of growth, the overall health of the business. More importantly, that we are now clearer, I should say, not necessarily clear, but clearer about the path to sustainability from a regulatory perspective in Ethiopia. I will leave it there, and I'll hand over to you, Dilip. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. Caroline, confirm you can hear me well. Yes, we can hear you, Dilip. You may proceed. Thank you, Peter. Good morning, good afternoon, and good evening to all participants. As always, we are very pleased to engage with you following the release of our FY 2026 results. For those who have not yet reviewed our earnings materials, I encourage you to do so for a deeper understanding. We know, as several of you also joined in the morning release announcement, but let me share some quick highlights for the benefit of those that may not have had a chance. Overall, Safaricom Group has delivered a very strong set of results with solid growth across our core business in Kenya and encouraging progress in Ethiopia. I'll just talk about, you know, a few areas to allow you to ask questions. Starting with Kenya, customer base continues to expand, reaching nearly 58 million on a 90-day basis, with close to 40 million active on a 30-day basis. This reflects the trust and loyalty we have built over 25 years. M-PESA remains the engine of our business. Revenues grew 13.4% year-on-year. Again, another double-digit growth delivery for M-PESA, now contributing 45.6% of the service revenue for Kenya. Within that payment service revenue grew nearly 18%, both supported by consumer and business. Our merchant base more than doubled to 3.1 million, with revenue up 36%. Credit customers doubled to 18 million. Our wealth products are now gaining scale with over KES 21 billion asset under management. The M-PESA app, I'm referring to the old M-PESA app, have really gained traction last year with usage up sharply and also contributing more than 10% of M-PESA revenue. Connectivity business, which accounts for almost half of our base revenue, also performed well. Mobile data grew 14.4% year-on-year, driven by wider adoption of 4G and 5G devices, with average usage per customer rising nearly to 5 GB per customer per month. Voice revenue recovered in the second half. You recall our discussion in the H1, we had a decline in voice revenue, but you also signposted that H2, we expect it to be better. Actually, that has helped with the recovery, ending the year slightly in a positive note with about 1.3% growth. Fixed revenue also grew 12%- 12.2%, with strong momentum in the consumer segment, which grew 19.5%. We maintain our cost discipline. Direct costs were broadly flat, and operating costs rose mainly due to Forex and the advertising and promotion expenses leading to our celebration of Safaricom at 25 and also as M-PESA at 18. Leading to a very strong contribution margin of 75% and OpEx intensity stable at 18%. Support, of course, supporting a healthy bottom line. Turning to now to Ethiopia, we are seeing rapid scale. Active customers reached 13.6 million on a 90-day basis, with mobile data and Voice usage growing sharply. Service revenue more than double in last financial year, with mobile data contributing two-thirds of the total. Voice revenue also more than double, now accounting for 21% of service revenue. Importantly, on financial metrics, losses are now narrowing. EBITDA losses reduced significantly in the second half, and start-up losses declining by over 40%. The pathway to break even is becoming clearer, and we are confident in Ethiopia's long-term potential. At group level, the numbers are very strong. Service revenue grew 11%. EBITDA rose 35%. Net income excluding minority grew 67%, excluding impact of IAS 29. Operating free cash flow was up over nearly 40%, supported by lower CapEx, overall group CapEx and stronger earnings. Debt levels remain stable with a healthy long-term profile and reduced interest cost. In summary, Kenya delivered record results across all key metrics, while Ethiopia showed strong customer growth and reduced losses. You have seen that our board has also recommended a dividend, the full year dividend of KES 2 per share. Which of course KES 0.85 was paid interim, and the balance KES 1.15 per share pay would be paid after it's approved in the Annual General Meeting. This is the highest dividend that we have ever paid. Together with all of this performance and our record dividend payout, this pay, this performance truly underpin our Vision 2030 strategy and FY 2026 was the first year of that strategy and give us confidence as we move into FY 2027 with solid momentum. That's all I wanted to say, and thank you very much. Back to you, Caroline, for Q&A. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. Thank you, Dilip. Analysts and investors, what I'll do, I have seen lots and lots of questions come through, I'll try and theme them so that we get maximum benefit from this call in the short time that we have together. I see a question from Mike of Avior and Rohit of Citi with respect to the Ethiopia guidance. Allow me to combine those two. Dilip, I'll request that you respond to this question. The question in a nutshell is, can we provide more color on the Ethiopian guidance, particularly the key underlying assumptions and, for example, what level of subscriber additions are we targeting for FY 2027? What FX assumptions are embedded? I know, Rohit, you're asking too much of the detail. Really what Rohit is positioning, which is also the question coming from Mike, is: Given that depreciation and amortization is approximately KES 22 billion in FY 2026 and guided that FY 2027 EBIT losses will be in the region of KES 12 billion-KES 15 billion, this would imply a positive FY 2027 EBITDA of about KES 7 billion-KES 10 billion, assuming depreciation remains broadly unchanged. Does that imply that the business is expected to exit FY 2027 with positive EBITDA and not just break even during the year? I think, Dilip, it's just some color around the Ethiopia guidance in terms of some of the considerations. Having said that, I think, Rohit, just to help you and for the benefit of the rest on the call, if you could go to page 37 of the results booklet, it gives you the numbers with and without IAS 29. Remember, we guide without IAS 29. The numbers exclude IAS 29 adjustments. The KES 22 billion you're actually quoting for D&A is KES 15 billion, excluding IAS 29. Remember, that's where most of the unwinding is happening. Please note the base number to use is the numbers excluding IAS 29. Having said that, Dilip, if you could please respond. Thank you. Thank you for those question. I think, maybe I'll start with the one on the EBITDA. I think, looks like you have done quite a bit of calculation. Of course, we don't guide on our EBITDA other than the fact that we have reconfirmed in today's the EBITDA breakeven in FY 2027. EBITDA breakeven in FY 2027, of course, means that, you know, it could turn into a positive. I'm not able to confirm you on EBITDA because that's not what we guide for. Of course, you have seen the EBIT number. The EBIT number, I think we spoke about, the EBIT loss is now coming down significantly. It's half of what losses that we reported for FY 2026. I think this is also coming from the fact that if you look at the EBITDA, to look at your EBITDA question, the way to see is the FY 2026 EBITDA split of the H1 and H2 for the KES 15 billion loss, KES 15 billion+ loss for FY 2026. We had about KES 12 billion- KES 12.5 billion loss in H1, and that loss reduced to KES 2.7 billion in H2. Obviously the trajectory is what gives us the confidence that, and also the service revenue growth profile you have seen that the Q4 revenue growth momentum is the best that we had in the entire year, which is also supported by the price revision that we took, that we took in December, January. It's just the one quarter impact. Although, you can see the split of H1 and H2 revenue, H2 revenue trajectory is much better. Remember there is only one quarter impact of the full price revision that has actually come in FY 2026. As Peter was mentioning that the full impact of that will be visible in FY 2027. Without getting too details into it, I think, yes, we reconfirmed our EBITDA breakeven for Ethiopia in FY 2027. Now, on customers and on currency, Rohit, to your question, I think we have, o n the currency, it's not necessarily something that we typically, we do few scenarios. You know, what has been the currency scenario in the past and how it can play out. Of course, without, we don't have a full view or full understanding about how the Middle East war will play out. I mean, by that, I mean, by the way, that applies both for Kenya and Ethiopia. For Ethiopia, I think there is that part of not necessarily so much on the fuel cost because we don't have reliance of diesel a lot on Ethiopia. It's mostly what happens because of the fuel cost-led inflation, which could change the trajectory. At this point in time, we don't necessarily have a full visibility or full assessment of how this will shape up. Beyond that, I think on the currency, you have seen that throughout the year, H2, ETB to USD remain more and mostly stable. I think probably the slowest decline of currency that we have seen. The EUR to ETB although was a different story. That was not specific to only Ethiopia. That happened in pretty much every countries, including Kenya. I think there are a few scenarios that we normally do when we build our guidance and then we go ahead with what we think is the most likely scenarios, and that has also implication of currency. And also remember the point Peter has raised that the price revision is a staggered price revision. It's still, the impact of the full revision is still not seen because the full revision of price has not happened. You will see probably in the coming days more price revision coming to place, and that is also part of the assumption. I think on customers, we had a very good momentum in FY 2026, you know, moving from 8.8 million to 13.6 million on 90-day basis. We have seen across Voice, mobile data, customer growth. So we, of course, we rely, remember our discussion around the medium-term outlook of the scale business, which is on customer about 15 million-20 million, and then base stations or sites around 4,000. We are not far away from that. Obviously on a scale business, that's what we believe that we'll be coming closer to that in FY 2027. You can assume that the numbers would be broadly around that, both for sites as well as for customers. Caroline, I hope I have answered all the questions. Yes, yes, you have, Dilip. Thank you very much for that. It's given us some good flavor. Still speaking to guidance, Dilip, maybe you can also make mention on the CapEx. The question being: What is driving the lower CapEx outlook for Ethiopia? Are we increasing reliance on external or shared network infrastructure? How should we think about the margin implications of this approach? In our past discussion, if you recall, again, I'm referring to our medium-term outlook that had on the scale on customer, that spoke about sites and that also spoke about EBITDA breakeven and the investment period. What we have spoken about in the past that we are coming out of the peak investment period and then, you know, getting closer to the scale business, that's what is coming in this year. The reduction is very much part of the planned CapEx that we have planned for. It doesn't mean that we are not going to invest in future. It just means that the way we plan for our business to scale with the level of CapEx that we wanted to put in, it is how it was planned for. This does take care of, w e are not compromising on our ambition to reach to the scale business in terms of the number of sites, that very much part of our plan, and that's how the number is. I think we did signpost in the past that the group CapEx, which actually increased significantly in the past, is likely to come down. You have seen in the last three years, every single year, overall group CapEx is coming down on the back of reduced CapEx from Ethiopia. Having said that, I think we'll always look for opportunities to see as any scale business look for opportunities to grow the business beyond the scale business, and that will also show up in some form or shape. That's not necessarily part of our, you know, the original, the way we defined our investment period. The CapEx guidance that you see is in line with what we have provided you, a kind of an investment period and therefore the CapEx investment that we have planned for. Caroline? Yes. Thank you, Dilip. Peter, would you like to add something on that? Yeah. Dilip has covered it pretty well. Probably the one dimension I wanted to add is to say that we in sizing how we face CapEx, we've also looked at ability to sweat the asset as Wim calls it. Which is we've invested a lot, we are everywhere in the country. Are we utilizing the asset base that we have in the way we want it utilized? Also to secure the kind of margins we want into the future. The third thing, Wim will be happy, not happy, well, but will react to this, is we also want to hold ourselves to account for delivering breakeven within the profile of CapEx or site sizing that we wanted. Once we're in a good place and actually a lot of the regulatory issues have been confirmed, then it's easier to now have a path that allows us to accelerate. But with much clearer cash flows, implications, and less kind of risks around it. That's also one of the other dimensions, but we are not, kind of, denying the business CapEx with growth potential. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. Now that you have the mic, Peter, I will request you respond to questions around the M-PESA app. Generally the query being around, you know, how long the M-PESA app disruption lasted and whether we expect to see any impact in our performance from that. Peter? I think my iPad was making sure that I don't answer the question. Probably it was going to call someone else to answer the question. But I'm very happy, very happy to answer the question. When we announced results this morning, I said that we did not get the actual launch right. The actual design of the OneA pp is very strong, and the intention is to create a house of value that brings together Safaricom and M-PESA app into one kind of properly designed and with the same design principles that allow our customers not to come into the app because they're coming for GSM services or because they're coming for M-PESA services, but to come to a house of value for Safaricom. The philosophy is right, the design was okay. The way we launched it was not great, I have to say, because we caused unintended consequences. The first is, we realized that there were lots of customers that had set their M-PESA app or rather their app, whether it's M-PESA or Safaricom, for auto-update. Therefore they were upgraded to a new version. They were not aware of it, so I don't think the team understood that we would have as much kind of flow. It was a large number of customers. Then the second, for our diaspora and roaming customers, there was complications about authentication. Because one of the things we designed into the new OneApp was to make sure much better security features in the back end, and that required fresh authentication. That's one of the reasons why, and I saw a question on why we are asking customers to use a Safaricom SIM. That's one of the reasons because what we realized is fraudsters were directing fraud depending on your level of vulnerability. So we wanted to secure that. As a result of that, we got a lot of customer feedback. We set up a crisis team and I have to say, we have seen significant improvement in terms of functionality and experience. We have been testing with customers every two days. Especially on the Android, we actually have made very good progress, and we are in very good territory. On iOS, there's still work to be done, and certainly on diaspora, there's work that has happened, and there's now beta testing on an app that we want targeted at that and a specified focused care, whether that is email or otherwise, that will allow us to make sure that we channel the issues that non-domestic customers have. My belief is that we will end up with much better UI, UX, with much better experience for customers and in a much, with a much better app. Of course, there is legacy feeling from customers that we should have launched it better and that we have to continue to manage. We apologize for that, and we continue to really stay close to this issue. I wanted to just to leave it there but saying, it's being handled, it's improving, and we believe that it'll make a big difference. In terms of revenue, remember that the reason why we are setting it up is for so that it delivers the right experience. These customers, we have not seen any major impact from a revenue perspective. We don't want to focus on revenue at this stage. We want to focus on ensuring that we get intuitive, secure, UI, UX and an experience that we wanted everyone to have. Caroline, I hand over back. Thank you. Thank you, very much, Peter, for that. Wim, I'll request that you respond to these next questions. Actually, two questions from Tracy. Tracy of SBG Securities. The questions are. So the first one is, how is Safaricom Ethiopia positioned in pricing versus competition post the price increases? She's basically seeking to understand, you know, premium discount, sort of variations in the Voice and data pricing versus competition. You can also respond to her second question around population coverage. How the population coverage for Safaricom Ethiopia compares to competition. Wim, over to you. Thanks, Caroline, for the question. Let me take it on the pricing. On data, Safaricom has a slight premium, 10%-15% overall on average. It also depends on some of the packages, especially on the big volume bundles. We are more expensive than competition. Blended on average of about 10%-15% price premium. We think we can afford that because we are offering still the better user experience. That premium comes also with much better speeds. On the voice, it's slightly different, especially on net voice. We are discount versus competition. Which, you know, is logic because we are the data network primarily. That's how we entered the market. And now on voice, we are a bit discounted versus competition. But you've seen in our results that the voice revenue is actually growing disproportionately. That strategy is working to get more relevance and converting more customers from just data users also to upsell basically voice services to them. On voice, we're slightly discounted versus competition. Population coverage, 4G population coverage, y ou know that we roll out a network 2G, 3G, 4G. All our sites are 4G coverage. So we have 60% population coverage. Competition claims 70%-75% 4G population coverage. There is no independent study or assessment made by the regulator to confirm this data, not be able to comment on that. But our 60% is for sure real, and it used to be higher than what competition has done. I'll leave it at that. Cannot comment on competition population coverage at this stage. Thank you. Thank you very much, Wim, for that. Coming back to you, Dilip, two related questions. One asked by Madhi and the other one by Tracy. With respect to M-PESA performance, the question being around why there was a decline half on half with respect to the growth of M-PESA revenue. If you could discuss any drivers around that versus trends. Just the deceleration in growth of M-PESA half on half. Yesh. So I think there is nothing on operational or commercial execution part that comes out specific to this H1, H2. I think we have always been signposting that we continue to grow M-PESA double-digits and have been growing. I think also depends on sometimes the base effect of that. We can confirm you that there has not necessarily been any commercial reason or rationale or any particular side, part of the business that is slowing down or caused any concern on that. I think overall, M-PESA revenue profile, the growth profile, volume, transactions, and monetization pretty much remain similar between H1 and H2. I, you know, this is not a concern on other than the fact that it could be a base effect or, you know, it is just a seasonality on how things shape up. We continue to grow, as you have seen that, you know, we talk about growing M-PESA revenue double-digit as far as our medium-term outlook is concerned, and we continue to deliver that as well. Back to you, Caroline. Thank you. Thank you, Dilip, for that clarification on the growth of M-PESA. With that, I'll request Peter, if you could respond to this next question from Madhi of HSBC with respect to FX availability. The question reads: Can you please discuss the FX availability situation in Kenya? FX rate looks quite stable despite global FX trends being very volatile. Are we able to get enough FX for CapEx and dividend distributions to internationals? Any issues in getting money out of Kenya right now? Just for some color on FX availability, Peter. That's a great question. I know that we faced liquidity challenges or at least investors faced liquidity challenges sometime 2021, 2022, 2023-ish. There was a long time that was taken to be able to deal with some of those challenges. I think the benefit that we have seen with the current Governor is he has been very deliberate in ensuring that the market continues to operate in the way it's always operated. Liquidity is very good. The import cover is very high. I believe Dilip, you can confirm, but it's closer to six months. Which says that liquidity for the country is good. Who knows how it will be affected by the current war in the Gulf because liquidity was also improved because of the way that the country was also sourcing oil for the country or refined oil for the country. When you go on the private side, we have not had or faced any issue. Certainly, not us. Remember, we also have access to IMT flows. That notwithstanding, even from a customer perspective, we have not felt that the market has faced any challenges, and we don't hear anything like that from banks. I do not believe that there is any issue that was experienced before. That is before we factor in any implication of the current issue in the Gulf. Dilip, feel free to add any further color. No, thank you, Peter. I think you covered pretty much everything. Madhi, from a reserve perspective, it's absolutely the, I think the highest level Kenya or Central Bank had ever had. There is no liquidity issue market for even normal consumers. I think that's absolutely, there's I think the issue could be because fuel is what the biggest part of the input and then how prices shape up in the future and what are the other implications is something for watch out. Right now it's quite comfortable. Thank you. Thank you for that, Peter and Dilip. There are a couple of questions on fuel and energy costs, which I believe are coming from a place of the fact that there is potential exposure with respect to Middle East war. Maybe Dilip and maybe Peter could add on just some color around the Middle East war impacts in terms of potentially what we see right now in as much as it's still early days. I think that's one of the emerging issues that Peter spoke about in this morning's presentation. In a very stable macro environment, the Middle East war is what is now the emerging risk, which you don't have a full assessment at this point in time. I think I'll try and see from what is happening in Kenya. Initially, we didn't have much of impact coming in because the prices were negotiated before, and then there was availability. There was no issue at all. We have seen an increase in the diesel price, along with the reduction in the VAT, but still an increase in the pump price of diesel, which does impact. I think to that extent, you can say that risk is already crystallized and that we are aware of, and you could say we had factored in. Beyond that, there are other issues linked to that. One is availability and then the ripple effect of fuel price and the overall inflation and logistics. I think that's what you need to watch out how that plays out. From an availability perspective, we typically are able to secure about two months of stocks at any given point in time. We store them based on our contract with the oil marketeer. Not necessarily, we cannot guarantee price, at what price you'll buy back. At least it will be available. Both Kenya and Ethiopia, this, the telecom is an essential service and therefore, whatever at any point in time, it is prioritized for the telecom operators. For Ethiopia, I think beyond that, the actual reliance and actual impact on the fuel is minimal. I think we can add on to that. It's not necessarily a big impact on the cost side because we have a less reliance on diesel. The challenge is on the impact of the fuel price increase on and everything else, and therefore inflation, which was on a very correct, you know, you've seen the inflation, the lowest inflation in the last how many years? Maybe, you know, 10 years or eight years. This is the lowest that we have seen at what we had a single-digit inflation. That could change, and that could also have an impact. I mean, it is fair to say that what we know now is what is factored in our guidance in both Kenya and Ethiopia. What we don't know, we don't know, and obviously you have to assess and see, you know, how this shapes up in the balance of the year. I don't think any one of us have any better view on this beyond what we know now today, and which is what we cannot comment on. This is confirmed that an emerging risk we are monitoring and tracking very closely, both from availability, ensuring that customer services is not disrupted, but also on the cost of fuel, as well as the implication on the inflation. Peter, Wim? Let's start with Wim on Ethiopia, but happy to comment on Kenya briefly just to add what you've said. Actually, may as well do it, do it now, rather than hand over to Wim and then revert back. One of the other elements that is making us feel that our strategy has worked is, you know, over the past two, three years, we have been on a big energy modernization program, where we are solarizing and also modernizing our energy needs, especially on sites. As a result of that, we now have 2,000 fully modernized, and we already are in flight. Others are already in flight for this financial year. As a business, we believe we'll be more resilient long term. Not short term. Of course, short term there's still a lot of implication. Certainly, we believe that investment will pay off and is starting to pay off even as we mitigate. Because we'd have had a much bigger risk if we didn't have this program in play. Wim, you can answer some of like our prioritization in Ethiopia. Thanks, Peter. Yes, I can confirm what Dilip was saying. We do not have a high dependency on fuel for our network operations in Ethiopia. 98% of our sites are connected to the grid. As you probably know, the grid in Ethiopia is 100% hydro. The fuel cost, I think that was one of the questions on the chat that I saw. The fuel cost, as a standalone line item is about 3% of the total OpEx structure. In terms of cost, we are not heavily depending on price fluctuations. Where we are more vulnerable is the inflation impact, the purchasing power impact. So more of the macroeconomic point of view, not necessarily as a major contribution to our cost structure. All right. Thank you. Thank you very much, leaders. I'll come back to you, Peter. I have two related questions from Madhi and Tracy with respect to the license. The question is around if we could clarify what was the cost of the license renewal, and is it all the licenses or only specific services? So some, just some color around the license that you spoke about in the morning. Yeah. On a later note, I thought that Madhi and Tracy would be extremely happy and shouldn't ask me questions about cost and so on, and so on. Actually on a kind of more serious note, we were quite anxious that especially when the Communication Authority did not have enough time to renew those licenses and had to extend it for two years, to 2026. Now that we have had that renewal confirmed, that is actually very, very good for us. I would say we've done this as a kind of normal business. We normally don't necessarily disclose license fees and all those things. These are part of the regulatory frameworks that the regulators have. We are secure as far as licensing is concerned. That's what I wanted to say because there was a bunch of licenses that were coming up for renewal by the end of June this year. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. Now that I still have you, Peter, just a question around, you know, the regulatory environment from a policymaking perspective from Madhi. He's asking: What are the risks of higher taxes on consumers or corporates? Are there any proposals to increase VAT, excise rates, and the like? On a positive note, we are always very proactive in understanding the framing of tax proposals as leading up to the Finance Bill. Remember I said at the beginning that we know that the Finance Bill is coming soon. Next year is an election year. We are waiting to see the shape of the way the government wants to raise its revenue and which areas they are likely to deal with. We are very connected with various bodies, whether that is private sector, industry bodies and also of course with the ministry, the relevant ministries to ensure that the issues that affect the industry are understood, our needs are actually understood. More importantly, that especially where taxes may lead to higher pricing, that there is understanding, and especially given what is happening in the environment. We do not have sight at this stage of the framing of actually the Finance Bill. When we do, of course, if there's a big risk, then we'll be able to get in touch with you guys through our IR team. Count on us to be proactive in managing this. However, we can never rule out whatever the government, or rather whatever the revenue or whatever the treasury intends to do so that they balance the books. That's why we said the outstanding issue, both in Kenya and Ethiopia, is the fiscal space. Therefore tax will always be an instrument. We'll wait and see. Thank you. Thank you very much, Peter. Dilip, moving over to you. Some question on the Kenya numbers from Samuel Njihia. He does say that you highlighted that euro depreciation contributed to higher operating costs in Kenya. If you could help quantify the main areas of euro exposure within the Kenya business and explain how, you know, the FX movement impacted costs in that period. The second question, still from Samuel, is on the ECL provisions, the fact that they declined materially during the year. If you could please shed some color on the same. Yeah. I think on, I did mention about, yes, on the euro depreciation, impacting the operating cost. You know this has been pretty much in every market. It's not Kenya alone. Same happened in Ethiopia as well. Our exposure in euro is, if you, for example, the CapEx that we have two vendor policy. We have Nokia as well as we have Huawei. Nokia, of course, payments are in euro to the extent we import. Also few other services that we, be it in OpEx or be it in CapEx, that we import from the eurozone where, you know, the currency is in euro. At the hour, you know, overall, I can't quantify exactly how much is that, but I think our split between euro and USD is about 50/50. 50% in euro and 50% in dollar. When the euro depreciated and you have, you've seen that impact. It's, yes, of course, on an OpEx, it does impact. This time I think the depreciation was, if I recall, the number was about 7.3%, and that's what has impacted the number. It's not a big number, because we have over a period of time, we actually localized many of our vendor payments in local currency. That was one step that we have taken deliberately. I mean, we, if I can share with you the number, I think our payment, we pay mostly 70% of our payments through, in Kenya, through local currency. That's the exposure that still we have, but these are imported, and then you cannot have any choice. On ECL, you'd recall last year's ECL provision. It's in the context of you have to go back and see that you, we had an increase in ECL provision last year, driven by mostly from the handset device financing. You know, we did accelerate our device financing proposition. Of course, still makes sense in terms of the overall business case, but it does impact an ECL when the collection or, you know, the collection falls short. There was also, I think there are the technical issue of the way, and also the way we wanted to give the customer propositions. We took a pause and then kind of we did a reset on not only doing through our own device financing, through our own balance sheet, but also we decided to explore markets like open market and to the partner markets, the partners who are also in this business. That reset is device sales, which is what you buy and sell from our EADAK facility, has also declined. You've seen a decline in our, or you've seen a lower growth in our direct cost is also coming from the lower device sales. It's a combination of lower device sales and also a very small device financing, what we call the Lipa Mdogo Mdogo proposition compared to what we have done in the previous year, is what has caused this reduction in the ECL. Remember that ECL reduction is in the context of higher growth that we have seen in the last financial year. Thank you. Thank you very much, Dilip, for that. Wim, I'll be requesting that you respond to this question from Linet of Absa. The question is around M-PESA in Ethiopia. Please advise on any updates regarding management's tactical approach to boost M-PESA penetration in Ethiopia. Do we have any recent partnerships under consideration? Just some color around the M-PESA strategy. Okay. Thanks, Caroline. Yeah. Today we are at 25% penetration of the M-PESA users in the Safaricom base. 25% of 30-day telco users are also active M-PESA users. The primary usage today is buying data bundles. That is the carrot that we're holding, now we are upselling, let's say, upselling additional use cases, primarily focused around payments. That's why we are accelerating the rollout of our merchant network. Today we have 70,000 30-day active merchants. That becomes quite significant because we're getting more relevance out of the M-PESA wallet. Instead of just buying our own Safaricom products, now also at 70,000 outlets, you can do actually M-PESA payments. That will then allow going further to start upselling real financial services, 'cause you have now history around doing payments. You can then start offering OD, buy now, pay later, term loans, saving products. It's really a journey of getting the customers on board with a attractive value proposition to buy Safaricom products, then converting them into customers, using M-PESA to do payments. Thirdly, you push them to the more sustainable, truly financial services around saving and lending. Thank you. Thank you for that, Wim. I trust, [Sila], that also does answer your question around M-PESA in Ethiopia as well. Just to acknowledge from the investors and analysts, we do appreciate you for the congratulatory messages you're putting also on the Q&A. We do appreciate you for that. I'll request, Dilip, if you could answer this question from [Baiju]. The question is: We have not heard much about data center capacity and utilization in both Kenya and Ethiopia. Would you be able to give an update on this? Okay. Yeah, it didn't come through probably in the way we present. We don't necessarily go through that level of detail in data center. You would recall that we installed one of the most modern data center in Limuru, and that's fully operational. The Fintech 2.0 that we have put into operation, I think the whole environment is in the new data center. Beyond that, currently we are in, so we are actually using pretty much what we have, and currently we are also building or we are in the phase of building our, the next data center close to where we have the first data center in Limuru. That progress is going on. We are constantly monitoring and assessing the requirements of the usage, and we have seen that the usage is growing and usage is also growing. You know, Kenya is one of the probably leading countries where there's a lot of AI usage, and that also puts a significant demand on the capacity. We do have our own data center, and we also leverage our partnership that we have with quite a few data center in Kenya. I think you're quite familiar with them. They are whether it be iXAfrica, icolo. We leverage the ecosystem, but also we are expanding our data center to a much bigger and broader capacity. We do have ambition to take it to even further to build capacity now that we can serve the customers that we are not serving now. Currently, we are not necessarily under any pressure. We, capacity is adequate, but we need to move fast in terms of building more capacity, be it by ourselves or any other partnership model that we can leverage on. Yeah, I hope that answers your questions, [Baiju]. Yeah. Thanks. Thanks, Dilip, for that. The second question still from [Baiju]. Sorry, I did not, yeah. Thank you Sorry, I did not answer the Ethiopia questions. Okay. Thanks. Thanks. Ethiopia data center, I think we are fairly capacitated to a point, I think we are saying maybe we have opportunity to do beyond what we are serving our own needs and getting you know, probably get more customers and more colocation in our data center. That will happen probably at appropriate time. I don't know, Wim, you have any colors to add there? I think we are fairly capacitated at this point. Well, yes, Dilip, nothing really to add. As Peter has mentioned, you know, we're in a sweat the asset phase, there's no immediate plan to expand on data center. We have enough for now. Of course, in the long term, probably need more, there are also quite some opportunities in Ethiopia to do leasing if that would be required. No particular urgent need for any data center expansion, capacity expansion at this stage. All right. No, thank you. Thank you, Dilip and Wim. Dilip, just still from [Baiju], and this is with respect to satellite. On your increased data usage for fixed and mobile, how much has partnering with satellite data companies contributed to the data consumption and economies of scale? Then on a longer term basis, what's our strategy around this new infrastructure partnership? If you could just comment around that and strategy around satellite. I think Peter alluded this in the morning. Our satellite strategy, you know, is not necessarily relying on only one particular operator. I think in the half-yearly or even I think the full-year results, we spoke about that we were in discussion. I think in the half-yearly results that we spoke about, that we concluded our partnership with one of the operator, which is Starlink, for two areas. Which is one is on the backhaul and also potential replacement for VSAT with the services that they offer. We have concluded that agreement along with other Vodacom markets, and actually this was also announced publicly. We also had the other agreement signed for the enterprise offerings for their dish, the services that they provide. Yet converted that into an actual execution simply because Peter mentioned about it that I think the regulatory environment is still evolving and there has been, I mean, the requirements from the regulator side for any satellite operators that come into Kenya need to have certain regulatory compliance and regulatory licensing that they need to do. What we are hearing is that that's what probably currently ongoing. I mean, unfortunately, although we have the agreements in place, we have not necessarily been able to fully put into place in that agreement into action. Hopefully that sort, gets sorted out in future. We are also, I think we spoke about our testing with AST SpaceMobile. We have spoken to the other operators, including Kuiper, Amazon Kuiper. The satellite will be a much more broad-based arrangement rather than just relying on one operator. We also have to watch out how this particular regulatory environment plays out in Kenya as we wait for the more clarification and more clarity. Till such time, we have the agreement, but we'll only implement, we'll only launch when we have the full regulatory clearance in place. Thank you. Thank you, Dilip. I have two questions, related questions, from both [Farooq] and [Jonathan]. And Peter, I'll be requesting that you kindly respond to this one. It's with respect to the Vodafone Kenya government stake sale, and the question is around with the court process, whether there's any update we can give on when to expect a ruling. The follow-up related question is, given the ownership changes expected, how does management think about maintaining political and regulatory goodwill whilst still earning attractive returns? Peter? Those are the questions I said they are set up questions. On a more serious note, I think it's a fair question, but I think the chairman this morning did respond to it. What the characterization of this is that remember us, we are running our business as management. This is a transaction between two shareholders who are the big shareholders of Safaricom. Other than minor roles that we play, we actually are not involved in the actual transaction. It's not in my gift to actually guide on what the process will be. From what we know, is that the process has been managed well so far, at least from what we see, because the parliamentary process is now complete. There's a court process, that will take its time. For us, we cannot express a view as to when the court will rule. Yes, there's a next court process, I would prefer not to comment on that and wait for when that concludes in the fullness of time. Of course, once the share exchange happens, then the next steps will happen. In terms of your question on post share sale by government, I will say what I've said in the past and what I also have said to any stakeholder who have asked me this question. I think Vodafone, Vodacom are not new to Safaricom. They understand our strategy. They have been part of our strategy for a very long time. Our expectation is the strategic direction is not going to shift. Actually, the reason why there is interest in Safaricom is because of the quality of franchise and the just diversity of the business and the whole purpose story that we drive. In terms of impact on our influence, government will continue to be a major shareholder at 20%. We'll have directors on the board. Treasury will still be part of our board, as in our treasurer representatives, our shareholder on behalf of government. Secondly, this is a regulated industry, so you do expect that will continue in the normal course. That's one of the, so Safaricom's role in this country has been related to the way we play the role for the country rather than purely be the shareholders that we have. I don't comment on any changes. I would prefer that we wait until that time. I do not see any material shift in the way the government thinks about regulating our industry just because this shareholding has happened. [inaudible] Thank you. Thank you, Peter, for that. Maybe Dilip, just to close the loop on still a related question on the Vodafone acquisition. There's a question from [Nancy], a more accounting-related question. The question reads: with that acquisition that will have a controlling 55% stake in Safaricom, given that it will trigger full IFRS consolidation of Safaricom results into Vodacom, could management clarify or give some color around what operational and structural changes are being considered under the new ownership dynamic? Whether there are any plans maybe to centralize any functions into South Africa. I mean, I know it's early days, but Dilip, any color you'd give from a consolidation aspect perspective that would point us in that direction. Yeah. I think I won't comment on anything which gets consolidated, no, anything that gets done by South Africa or any other countries. But your point of the full IFRS consolidation, is one of the say, the impact of the change in ownership. We are very much aware of it. Of course, you'll have to wait till the time the transaction is happening. But internally, we are very much aware. We have, we know what efforts and what systems and what processes need to change. Caroline, I think, Dilip is having challenges Should this transaction come through. Due diligence of that has been done as part of this warning. Can you hear me now? I switched off my video. Yes. Yes. I think we can hear you much better. Maybe you can just summarize again. Yeah. What I was saying, the requirement of IFRS consolidation, full consolidation is very well understood by us based on our engagement with the Vodafone team. Remember, we do still report, but report on a much smaller scales. The number of lines that need to be reported and the whole, I think there is a whole exercise which was done as part of the due diligence exercise. What I was confirming to you is that we are aware of it. We understand what shifts are required, and also we know that we can prepare well as and when this is required. This will require a little bit more capacity within the Safaricom accounting and reporting environment. We don't think this is going to cause any major concern, which we can, which is pretty much manageable. I also said that we don't know or we don't anticipate at this point in time any change in where any consolidation of, you know, anything that will be done from a, from South Africa perspective. Right now it is business as usual with full preparation, in anticipation of if that happens, that we should be able to report and report in full compliance of IFRS. Thank you. Thank you, Dilip, for that detailed response. I trust that you were able to capture it. We apologize for that network disruption there. Coming back to you, Peter, there is a question from John Davies of Bloomberg Intelligence. The question is around the fact that Central Bank had a proposal last year to cap mobile P2P charges at an average of KES 10 by next year. Is that still a live discussion? John, yeah, that's a good question, and is a question, it's something we are aware of. It wasn't a formal view or even policy or position of the bank itself. It came from a recommendation that was initiated through a process of research and so on, funded externally. It wasn't something that the Central Bank came up with a policy. That notwithstanding, as you know, over the past four or five years, we've been on a journey to ensure that we have more affordable services on the M-PESA, in particular P2P. Many of you know that we have guided you over the years, over the last few years, on how we continue to reduce, either to avail more free services or actually to reduce the cost of various services. And we'll continue to do that proactively instead of waiting for the regulator. One of the things that the regulator mentioned, or rather that report mentioned, is that the cost was high and the cost was in relation to what was being charged. What was excluded, it's all the transactions that are free, that had been excluded from that computation. We did feedback into the Central Bank that there's a lot of transactions that are free. This morning when we released results, we did give the detail of the split between chargeable and non-chargeable. 58%, mostly what we call Kadogo of transactions on M-PESA are free. We need to continue to demonstrate to the Central Bank and to anyone else that we are actually offering services that are affordable. We'll continue to have this dialogue and keep you informed. Thank you. Thank you very much, Peter. Dilip, coming back to you. A question here from [Farooq] on M-PESA revenue contribution. As it approaches 50%, will group margins and returns continue to improve? Where do you see M-PESA revenue contribution in five years' time? Yeah. [Farooq], this is one question I was asked in the morning in another interview. What we said, we don't necessarily look at the what will be the contribution. Contribution of M-PESA revenue is not management's target. What we've spoken about is how we are going to grow the business overall. Within that, M-PESA is also very important part of the growth story. You recall, [Farooq], that we spoke about for Kenya a medium-term outlook. That outlook, especially on the top line side, we said the three streams of revenue or three business segments that we track and then we report to you, connectivity business, fixed business, which also include fixed wireless and M-PESA business. We give a color what we believe in the medium term we can sustain a growth. On connectivity, we said that we expect to continue growing a high single-digit. You have seen the number from the report. We delivered close to 7%. A 6.9% growth for the full year in connectivity business. Of course, driven majorly by mobile data, which contributed 80%, 82% of the growth. Within that we said that we expect, given the current penetration and the growth trajectory and also still the penetration and the market opportunity, the untapped market opportunity that we have with 30 million+ devices, only half of them are using only 1 GB per customer per month. We believe that there is a runway to growth double-digit in mobile data. Then we spoke about M-PESA. We said that we believe we can sustain a double-digit growth in M-PESA. That confidence is coming from the expansion in the ecosystem that you continue to see, driven by the new products and launch. The new product launches that we continue to do, which is visible. You have seen the numbers. We grew 13.4%, within that, the quality of growth is quite broad-based, even within M-PESA. It's not just traditional businesses that we are growing. Even the newer segments, including financial service segment, you have seen the merchant payments growing 36%. We have seen the credit recovery growing 20%+. It's a broad-based growth that we see. That's what we said we can grow mobile financial services. The M-PESA can sustain a double-digit growth. Comes the fixed, although on a small base, we said we can also sustain a double-digit growth. This is one area we're investing, and we believe it will give us the return on a long-term basis. I think if we do this is what we management said as part of our outlook, whatever comes as part of the contribution of M-PESA is an outcome. You have seen that it's now touched 45.6%. We don't know when it will touch 50%, I think from a margin perspective, the mix of that at we You have seen that we talk about a lot about the monetization take rate. The newer services that we are launching have lower take rate, it also has lower cost. Therefore margin is still protected. You have not seen a dilution of M-PESA margin just because we have, you know, moved into newer services. What we are conscious, and what we do and we'll be doing consciously, is about giving value back to the customers in any form and shape that we are able to do. The small value transactions Peter spoke about is one way of giving back. Sometimes it doesn't show up. There you see that we are able to grow the revenue, but you also give back to the customers. I think that business model is working well for us. Launch more newer services, create the loyalty to ensure that the ecosystem grows, then we are able to grow revenue. And so to your question, yes, we don't necessarily have any target that we are aiming for to have any particular revenue to have a mix of this. What we are driving for is what I spoke about in our medium-term outlook. We don't believe that there is any threat on the margins just because M-PESA, a proportion of M-PESA could grow beyond 50%. Hope that answers your questions, [Farooq]. Thank you. Thank you very much, Dilip. Just maybe, some color, Dilip, [Sila]'s questions here on MTRs, that there was no mention of low MTRs. What was the impact of low MTRs in FY 2026? Maybe just some color around that. More specifically around the, you know, how we should think through voice revenues going forward now that there is a regulated glide path. Thank you. Thank you, [Sila], for that question. The reason I haven't spoken about MTR, because the impact in FY26 was only for one month. I think you rightly pointed out to the glide path that is now it's putting into place. The glide path is in a way will not impact any particular CS performance. Yes, it does change the incoming revenue a bit, but it's not necessarily a big change in the way it will show up. I didn't talk about it because it was just for one month in FY26. We welcome the glide path, the way it has been framed by regulator, and it is actually good for the industry because that is what has been, you know, we have been talking about it that any big drop in MTR in one single year, it does impact industry, so it should be a glide path. We see that that is how regulator has also framed it. We are happy about it. Of course, as I said, there was not much impact in FY 2026. Thank you. Thank you, Dilip. Samuel, I see your question around the initiatives of reducing FX exposure. I think quite a bit of that was addressed. Happy to touch base offline if you need some quantification. Having said that, Dilip, there's a question on fixed broadband on monetization strategy from Samuel. Maybe actually this one I can request Peter to respond, and Dilip, you could add on. With something that, Peter, you mentioned in the morning, that whilst higher speeds at unchanged pricing support customer retention and preserve ARPU, some users may see limited incentive to migrate to higher priced packages. Beyond speed upgrades, are there plans to deepen monetization through bundling or cross-selling additional products and services within the household ecosystem? He says that Safaricom had previously explored adjusted offerings such as bundled insurance products. Could management provide an update on the strategy for non-telco services within the fiber customer base going forward? Peter, some thoughts around that. Yeah. I think it's a very, very good question. But the way that I would think about it is to say we need to get our basics right in fixed before even we think about bundling, loyalty, retention, and all those elements. Here, what I said in the morning, that one of the biggest thing that we have done is to realize that we are serving only a layer at the top, at price points that were beyond reach, for your medium to low stroke budget users. In the past, say, six months-nine months, now we've done all the work that allows us to look at the economics of serving those two customer segments. Therefore, we are more confident as we get to 2027 that we have propositions and cost profile that allows us to price, but also to deliver the actual experience we want for medium and also budget segments. A good example is affordable housing. We are already involved with the affordable housing project where we are one of the primary providers of connectivity. When these houses are open, we already have connected, and all we are doing is to migrate those customers to propositions, but the actual fiber is installed. The second thing that we have done is to make sure the cost profile is right, and we've done a lot of re-engineering, and we've been able to reduce the cost, by, in some cases, up to 50%, by actually working through the value chain or the supply chain to ensure that we get materials that allow us, instead of starting with bulk fiber or, connections, we can actually make it much simpler. The third thing which is important is we are also piloting, and we've seen it with smaller ISPs. We are piloting tokenized Wi-Fi to see whether we can democratize access based on use, when you just want a token, one token or and not actually a bundle or even or even a plan. Once we get that right, and I wanted to add to the comment that had the question that had been asked on M-PESA in terms of whether we are targeting what happens when we are close at 50%. We now want to move in future to more we are offering services to segments of customers that are converged, whether on the consumer side or actually on the enterprise side, say for merchants. Therefore, we are less concerned about product that we are bundling together. We are more interested in having co-converged solutions for segments of customers. We talk about Boda Ya Boda, which is Boda Boda rider, but those farmers, we are targeting farmers. We are targeting various components within the customer segment. Therefore, when you bring it to fixed, we will actually also use the same philosophy once we have gotten our act together. In particular, one of the reasons why we increased speeds is we were also seeing more churn because we didn't have levels of quality of data, of experience that we needed to be able to ensure at peak demand that we have the right experience. We will use it. We'll use the same converged philosophy in fixed, but we need to get the basics right first. Yeah. Thank you. Thank you very much for that, Peter. I'm looking now towards closing the session. Before I bring on back Peter to make closing remarks, we have responded to your questions. A lot of them, the team has been responding also offline, and especially with respect to anything requiring quantification. So that is coming your way. Should you have any other follow-up post that, still feel free to get in touch with us through the main channel, the Investor Relations email address, and we shall still address that. I requested Dilip to respond to this last question. I had sort of saved it for last, from Madhi with respect to the dividend payout. I think, the expectation is that he would want more dividends. He's saying the dividend payout ratio has increased. Is there more upside? Before I bring on Peter for closing remarks. Dilip. No, I don't know what calculation, Madhi, you have done. I'm happy to, you know, the team can have, you know, we're very happy to engage with you. Actually, dividend policy have not changed. What exactly we have paid is 80% of our net income at consolidated level, excluding IAS 29 impact and adjusting minority interest. To that extent, we haven't changed. The growth obviously is coming from the reduced losses in Ethiopia and, of course, a solid performance, solid growth of 24.7% growth in net income in Kenya. Happy to engage with you separately. There is no plan or there is no intention to change dividend payout. You know, we actually just applying our existing policy, and that's how we're paying our full year dividend as well. Back to you, Caroline. Thank you. Thank you very much, Dilip. Once again, feel free to reach out to us for any other follow-up questions, for now, we'll bring the session to a close as I request Peter to give his closing remarks. Peter. Thank you, Caroline. Thank you, Dilip, and thank you to Wim for answering the questions. Thank you to everyone for attending this session. Incredibly good questions. Hopefully we have done justice in terms of answering your questions. If there's any residual concerns or questions, Caroline and the team will be able to answer them in the background now that we've finally announced our results and if there's any clarification, we can deal with it. In closing, I want to say we are very pleased with the results that we have announced, are very pleased with the very strong Kenya franchise, and s till very clear that there is still more opportunity to continue to drive performance in Kenya. And then really encouraged, I should say, by the path that we now see that is clearer in Ethiopia through the regulator-led pricing moves. Hopefully, if the industry does follow through, we believe that then we have a more sustainable industry. On a lighter note, I was surprised that there was not enough questions on, are you still staying true to your EBITDA positive guidance, but intention. Also I was asking Dilip and Caroline to tell me through individual investors what their models say, whether they still say 2029 and 30. That is for another day. Really, really great to have this chat. Thank you and a very, very good evening. Thank you. Thank you, Peter. Thank you, Dilip. Thank you, Wim. Thank you, team. From us here is to wish you a good evening and a good day and to keep engaging us. As Peter has said, this is just the beginning of many conversations, so I'm sure we'll be getting in touch with you in various forums. Otherwise, have yourselves a good day and keep well. Thank you very much.