Good morning and good evening. Thank you all for joining the conference call for the Hyundai Insurance earnings results. This conference will start with a presentation followed by a Q&A session. If you have a question, please press star and one on your phone during the Q&A. Now we will begin the presentation on Hyundai Insurance's second quarter of fiscal year 2025 earnings results. ์๋ ํ์ญ๋๊น? Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance์์ IR์ ๋ด๋นํ๊ณ ์๋ ๊ฒฝ์๊ด๋ฆฌํํธ Dong-gun Kim์ ๋๋ค. ๋ฐ์์ ์์ค์๋ Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance์ 2025๋ ์๋ฐ๊ธฐ ์ค์ ๋ฐํ ์ปจํผ๋ฐ์ค ์ฝ์ ์ฐธ์ฌํด ์ฃผ์ ์ ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. ๋ณธ ์ปจํผ๋ฐ์ค ์ฝ์ ์ง์์๋ต์ ํฌํจํด ์ฝ 1์๊ฐ์ ๊ฑธ์ณ Gu Byeong-mun ์์ฐจํต์ญ์ผ๋ก ์งํ๋๋ฉฐ, ๋จผ์ 2025๋ ์๋ฐ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฝ์์ค์ ๋ฐ ํ๋ฐ๊ธฐ ์ ๋ง์ ๋ํ ๋ฐํ ํ ์ด์ด์ง๋ ์ง์์๋ต ์๊ฐ์๋ ๋ฐฐ์ํ ๊ฒฝ์์ง์ด ์ฐธ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. Hello, everyone. I am Dong-gun Kim in charge of IR. First of all, I would like to thank our investors and analysts for joining our 2025 first half earnings conference call despite their busy schedules. Today our call will take approximately one hour, including presentation and Q&A. Korean and English consecutive interpretation will be provided after the presentation of our first half earnings and outlook for the second half. We will have a Q&A with the management present here today. ์ง๊ธ๋ถํฐ ์๋ฐ๊ธฐ ๊ฒฝ์์ค์ ๋ฆฌ๋ทฐ์ ํฅํ ์ ๋ง์ ๋ํ ๋ฐํ๋ฅผ ์์ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. We will now begin the presentation of the first half of 2025 performance review and outlook for the second half. ์๋ ํ์ญ๋๊น? ํ๋์ ๊ธฐํ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ถ๋ฌธ์ฅ ์ ๊ท์์ ๋๋ค. ์ด์ฒ์ด์ญ์ค ๋ ์๋ฐ๊ธฐ ์ปจํผ๋ฐ์ค ์ฝ์ ์ฐธ์ฌํด ์ฃผ์ ํฌ์์ ๋ฐ ์ ๋๋ฆฌ์คํธ ์ฌ๋ฌ๋ถ๊ป ๊ฐ์ฌ์ ๋ง์๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค. Good afternoon. I am Kyuwan Jeong, Head of the Corporate Planning Division at Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance. I would like to extend my sincere appreciation to all investors and analysts for joining our 2025 first half earnings conference call. ์ง๊ธ๋ถํฐ 2Q ๊ฒฝ์์ค์ ์ ๋ํด ์ค๋ช ๋๋ฆฌ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. 3 ํ์ด์ง ๊ฒฝ์ ์ฑ๊ณผ ์์ฝ์ ๋๋ค. 2025๋ 2Q ๋ณ๋ ๊ธฐ์ค ๋น๊ธฐ์์ด์ต์ ์ ๋ ๋๊ธฐ KRW 3,557์ต ๋๋น 30.4% ๊ฐ์ํ KRW 2,478์ต ์์ ๊ธฐ๋กํ์์ต๋๋ค. ์ผ๋ฐ ์ฅ๊ธฐ ์๋์ฐจ ์ ๋ณด์ข ์ ๊ฑธ์ณ ์ํด์จ์ด ์์นํ๋ฉด์ ํ์ฌ ์ ์ฒด ๋ณดํ ์์ต์ ์ ๋ ๋๊ธฐ 43.4% ๊ฐ์ํ KRW 2,127์ต์ ๋ฌ์ฑํ ๋ฐ๋ฉด, ํฌ์ ์์ต์ ์ ๋ ๋๊ธฐ ๋๋น 35% ์ฆ๊ฐํ KRW 1,295์ต์ ๊ธฐ๋กํ์์ต๋๋ค. ์๋ฐ๊ธฐ ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ค ROE๋ 19.6%์์ต๋๋ค. Let me begin with our second quarter results. Please turn to page three for the performance summary. For 2025 second quarter, net income on a standalone basis was KRW 247.8 billion, down 30.4% from KRW 355.7 billion during the same period last year. Across commercial, long term and auto insurance lines, loss ratio increased, leading to a 43.4% YoY decrease in overall insurance underwriting profit to KRW 212.7 billion. On the other hand, investment profit rose 35% YoY to KRW 129.5 billion. At the end of the first half, our ROE stood at 19.6%. ์ฌ์ ๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ ์ฑ๊ณผ์ ๋ํด ๋ง์๋๋ฆฌ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. ๋ถ๋ฌธ๋ณ ์ฑ๊ณผ๋ 2๋ถ๊ธฐ ์ค์ ์ค์ฌ์ผ๋ก ์ค๋ช ๋๋ฆฌ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. 4ํ์ด์ง์ ๋ณด์๋ ๋ฐ์ ๊ฐ์ด ์ฅ๊ธฐ๋ณดํ์ 2๋ถ๊ธฐ ๋ณดํ ์์ต์ ์ ๋ถ๊ธฐ ๋๋น 61.1% ์ฆ๊ฐํ์ต๋๋ค. CSM ์๊ฐ์์ต์ด ์ ๋ถ๊ธฐ์ ์ด์ด ๊ฒฌ์กฐํ ์ฆ๊ฐ ์ถ์ธ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ ๊ฐ์ด๋ฐ ๋ ๊ฐ ๋ฑ ํธํก๊ธฐ๊ณ ์ ํ์ฑ ์ง๋ณ ๊ด๋ จ ์ํด์ก์ด ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒ ์์ ํ๋๋ฉฐ ๋ณดํ๊ธ ์์ค์ฐจ ์ ์ ํญ์ด ์๋น ๋ถ๋ถ ์ถ์๋์์ต๋๋ค. ์๋ฃ ๋๋์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ผ๋ถ ์ง๋ณ ๋ด๋ณด์ ์ผ์์ ์ํด์ก ๊ฐ์์ ํธํก๊ธฐ ์งํ ๊ด๋ จ ์ค์๋ณดํ๊ธ ์์ ํ๋ก ์์ค์ฐจ ์ค์ ์ด ์ํธํ์๋ ์ ๋ ๋๊ธฐ ๋๋น๋ก๋ ๊ธฐ์ ํจ๊ณผ๋ก ์ธํด 36.6% ๊ฐ์ํ ์ค์ ์ ๊ธฐ๋กํ์์ต๋๋ค. Moving on to performance by business segments. I will focus on second quarter results. On page four, you will see that long term insurance underwriting profit increased 61.1% quarter-on-quarter. CSM amortization income continued its solid growth from the previous quarter, while claim payments related to respiratory infectious diseases, such as influenza, stabilized rapidly. This resulted in a significant reduction in the loss from claim variance. However, compared to the same period last year, underwriting profit declined 36.6% due to a base effect. This is because last year's second quarter performance benefited from temporary loss reduction in certain disease coverages due to the medical service disruption in Korea and from the stabilization of healthcare insurance claims related to respiratory illnesses. ๋จ๊ธฐ๋ณดํ ์ ๊ณ์ฝ ๋งค์ถ์ ๋ณด๋ฉด, ์ด ๋ถ๊ธฐ ์ํ๊ท ์ ๊ณ์ฝ ์ค์ ์ KRW 10.1 billion์ผ๋ก ์ ๋ ๋๊ธฐ ์ํ๊ท KRW 10.8 billion ๋๋น 7.3% ๊ฐ์ํ์๊ณ , ์๋ณดํ์ ์ํ๊ท KRW 9.1 billion์ผ๋ก ์ ๋ ๋๊ธฐ ๋๋น 7.2% ๊ฐ์ํ์์ต๋๋ค. For long-term new business sales, second quarter monthly average of new business premium was KRW 10.1 billion, a 7.3% decline from KRW 10.8 billion last year. Healthcare insurance. For healthcare insurance, the monthly average was KRW 9.1 billion, down 7.2% year-over-year. Looking at CSM for long-term insurance on the next page, the CSM balance at the end of the first half stood at KRW 9,376.4 billion, showing a rapid recovery supported by the April premium rate hike and ongoing increases in new business CSM. The new business CSM multiple has continued to improve since the strategic rate increase in April, recording 18.9x for healthcare insurance and 17.4x for total long-term new business in the second quarter. As a result, despite the decline in healthcare insurance sales, the total new business CSM amount increased 20.7% YoY to KRW 525.7 billion in the second quarter. Going on to auto and commercial insurance, turning on page six. Auto insurance underwriting profit was KRW 0.9 billion in the second quarter, down 97.7% YoY. This was due to the ongoing impact of premium rate reductions combined with higher claim costs from increased auto repair labor charges and rising use of Korean medicine treatments. Commercial insurance profit was KRW 27.6 billion, down 39.5% YoY, mainly due to large loss incidents such as the Kumho Tire plant fire. These are viewed as one-off events. Next, on our asset management. On the investment side, as part of our efforts to strengthen capital adequacy, we have been increasing our allocation to long-term bonds, resulting in a continued rise in the proportion of domestic bonds in our portfolio. In the second quarter of 2025, investment profit rose 35% YOY to KRW 129.5 billion, driven by sustained growth in interest income, valuation gains from equities and structured bonds, and higher foreign exchange gains within insurance and financial results due to a weaker Korean won USD exchange rate. Capital and K-ICS ratio. At the end of second quarter 2025, shareholders equity increased by KRW 524 billion from the end of the previous quarter, mainly due to higher market interest rates. Our K-ICS ratio improved by 10.6 percentage points quarter-on-quarter to reach 170%. This was supported by an increase in available capital from higher interest rates and a reduction in required capital through active duration management, including long-term, expanding long-term bond purchases and entering into forward contracts on government bonds. Let me now share our business outlook for the second half of 2025. Our key strategic focus will remain on enhancing profit generation capacity and improving capital adequacy through active asset liability duration management. First, building on the improved profitability of long-term new business achieved over the past two years, we will concentrate on increasing the total CSM in the second half. We aim to maintain the new business CSM multiple at industry-leading level of around 17x in the second quarter. We will also strengthen control over loss ratios, expense ratios and persistency rates to minimize year-end CSM volatility, thereby establishing a foundation for sustainable growth. Second, we will continue to focus on narrowing the asset liability duration mismatch gap. On the asset side, we will expand long-term bond purchases and actively utilize derivatives such as bond forwards. On the liability side, we will adjust our product portfolio to increase sales of long-term insurance products with lower interest rate sensitivity, thereby reducing our interest rate exposure. While external factors such as market interest rates and regulatory changes remain uncertain, through these capital improvement measures, we plan to maintain our RBC ratio above 100%, our K-ICS ratio above 170% by year-end, exceeding our initial projection. This concludes our presentation of the 2025 first half results and second half outlook. Thank you for your attention. This concludes our presentation. Now Q&A session will begin. Please press star one, that is star and one, if you have any questions. Questions will be taken according to the order you have pressed the number star one. For cancellation, please press star two, that is star and two on your phone. The first question will be provided by Dan Wang from J.P. Morgan Securities. Please go ahead with your question. Hi, good afternoon, and thank you for taking my question. I have two questions. The first one is about the dividends. Under the current like surrender value reserving practice, like the dividend proposal by the year-end might still face some challenges. I want to know from the perspective of management, like can you just share out some update regarding the guidance for the year-end dividends? The second question is about the solvency capital. In, in your PBT in the section of capital, it seems like the company's solvency ratio exhibits the relatively higher sensitivity against the interest rate movements. Can you explain to us what could be the key reasons behind that and what could be the key solutions from the company to tackle with that? Thank you. Can you please repeat the second question? It's, in particular, first part of the second question. Yeah. Yeah. In a slide, namely the capital that slide is the company shows that the solvency ratio has a lot larger sensitivity against the interest rate movement. I want to know about the reasons behind that and what could be the solution to tackle with that. Dan Wang์ ๋๋ค. ์ง๋ฌธ ๊ธฐํ ์ฃผ์ ์ ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒ์งธ ์ง๋ฌธ์ ์ด ๋ฐฐ๋น ๊ด๋ จํด์ ์ด๋ค ๋ณ๋ ์ฌํญ๋ค์ด ์์์ด ๋๊ณ ์๋์ง ์ฌ๋ฌ ๊ฐ์ง ์ ๋ ๋ณ๊ฒฝ ๋ฑ ์์ฅ ์ํฉ ๋ณ๋๊ณผ ๋๋นํด์ ๋ฐฐ๋น์ด ์ฐ๋ง๊น์ง ์ด๋ค ์์ผ๋ก ์งํ๋ ์ง์ ๋ํ ๋ฐฐ๋น ๊ด๋ จ ์ ๋ฐ์ดํธ ๋ถํ๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค. ๋ ๋ฒ์งธ๋ก๋ ์๋ณธ์ด ์ด ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋๊ฐ ์ข ๋ ๋์ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ณด์ฌ์ง๊ณ ์๋๋ฐ์. ์ด์ ๋ํด์ ํ์ฌ์์๋ ์ด๋ค ์์ผ๋ก ๋์ํ ์์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ด๊ฒ์ด ํฝ์ค ๋น์จ์ ๋ฏธ์น๋ ์ํฅ์ด๋ผ๋ ๊ฐ, ๋ ์ด ๋ถ๋ถ์ ๋ํด์ ํ์ฌ์์๋ ์ด๋ ํ ๋์ฑ ์ ๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ์๋์ง ๊ถ๊ธํฉ๋๋ค. ๋ค, ๊ธฐํ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ถ๋ฌธ์ฅ ์ ๊ทํ์ ๋๋ค. ๊ทธ ๋ฐฐ๋น ๊ด๋ จ ์ง๋ฌธ์ ๋ํด์ ๋ต๋ณ๋๋ฆฌ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. ๊ทธ ์ง๋ ์ด์ ์ ํฌ ๊ธฐ์ ์ค๋ช ํ ๋๋ ๋ฐฐ๋น ๊ด๋ จ ์ง๋ฌธ์ด ์์๋๋ฐ ๊ทธ๋ ์ ๊ฐ ๋๋ ธ๋ ๋ต๋ณ์ด ํฌ๊ฒ ๋ ๊ฐ์ง์์ต๋๋ค. ํ๋๋ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ ๋ด๋ถ์ ์ด์ ์ด์ต ์ฐฝ์ถ๋ ฅ์ ์ฆ๊ฐ๊ฐ ์ค์ํ๊ณ , ํนํ ์ ํฌ๊ฐ ์ ๋ ๊ฐ์ ์ด ๋์ง ์๊ณ ์๋ ๋ฐฐ๋น์ด ๊ฐ๋ฅํ ์ํฉ์ด ๋์ง ์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ ๋ ๊ฐ์ ์ด ๊ต์ฅํ ์ค์ํ ํฌ์ธํธ๋ผ๊ณ ๋ง์๋๋ฆฐ ๋ฐ ์์์ต๋๋ค. I am Kyuwan Jeong, in duty management and I will be answering the first question regarding the dividend portion. I received a similar question during April, during our IR call, and I provided a similar answer to this question. It's two fold. It is important for us to increase our capability to generate profit internally. For this to be possible, it is also important that changes into the regulatory system needs to be taken, or else we will not be able to pay out dividends. ๊ทธ ์ ๋ ๊ด๋ จ๋ผ์๋ ํฌ๊ฒ ์ด์ ์ธ ๊ฐ์ง๋ก ๋ง์์ ๋๋ฆด ์๊ฐ ์๋๋ฐ ๊ทธ ๋น์์ ์ ๊ฐ ์ฐ๋ฆฌ ํ์ฌ์ ์ด์ ์ด์ต์ฐฝ์ถ๋ ฅ ๊ฐ์ ์ ์ํด์๋ ๊ทธ ์ค์๋ณดํ ๋น์ค์ด ๋ง์ ํ์ฌ์ ํน์ฑ์ ์ค์๊ณผ ๋น๊ธ์ฌ์ ์์ด์์ ์ ๋ ๊ฐ์ ์ด ์ค์ํ๋ค๋ผ๊ณ ๋ง์์ ๋๋ ธ์๋๋ฐ, ์ธ๋ก ์์ ๋ฐํ๋ ๋ฐ์ ๊ฐ์ด ์ค์๊ณผ ๋น๊ธ์ฌ์ ๋ํ ์ ์ฑ ๋ฐํ๊ฐ ์์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ข ๊ธ์ ์ ์ธ ์ํฉ์ด ์๋ค๊ณ ์๊ฐํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ๋ ๋ฒ์งธ๋ก ๊ทธ ๋ถ์ฑ ํ ์ธ์จ ์ ๋ ์ํ์ ๊ดํ ์ฌํญ๋ค์ด ์ค์ํ๋ฐ, ์ด๊ฒ ์ญ์ ์ต๊ทผ ์ธ๋ก ์ ๋์ ์๋ ๊ฒ์ฒ๋ผ ๊ธ์ต๋น๊ตญ์์ ์ ๋ ์ํ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ผ๋ก ์ง๊ธ ์งํ์ ํ๊ณ ์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ด๊ฒ ๋ํ ๊ธ์ ์ ์ธ ์ ํธ๋ก ๋ณด๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. Regarding change in the regulatory system, I spoke about three areas that need to be improved during our February call. The first thing is that for a company that has a high portion of indemnity insurance products, for us to be profitable, we have to see some changes into the system regarding non-reimbursable indemnity related claims. There have been coverage in the media regarding the anticipated changes to system related to non-reimbursable. This is perceived as a positive signal. The second is related to our liability discount rate, which is anticipated to be done in a more alleviated way. Once again, the financial regulatory are disclosing some positive signals via the media. ์ ๋ ๊ฐ์ ์ ์ธ ๋ฒ์งธ ์ฌํญ์ผ๋ก ํด์ฝํ๊ธ๊ธ์ค๋น๊ธ ๊ด๋ จ ์ด์๊ฐ ์๋๋ฐ, ๋ณธ ์ฌํญ์ ์ง๊ธ ์์ง ์ ๋ถ ๋น๊ตญ์์ ๋ช ํํ ์ ์ฅ์ ํํํ ๋ฐ๊ฐ ์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ์ด ์๋ฆฌ์์ ์ ํฌ๊ฐ ์๋นํ ๋ ธ๋ ฅ์ ํ๊ณ ์๋ค๋ผ๋ ๊ฒ ์ด์์ผ๋ก ๋ง์๋๋ฆฌ๋ ๊ฑฐ๋ ์กฐ๊ธ ์กฐ์ฌ์ค๋ฌ์ด ์ํฉ์ด๊ธด ํฉ๋๋ค. ์ด๋ฐ ๋ ธ๋ ฅ๋ค์ด ์ด์ ๊ฐ์์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ณด์ฌ์ง๋ฉด์ ํ์ฌ์ ๋ฐฐ๋น ๊ฐ๋ฅํ ์ํฉ์ด ๋ค๊ฐ์ค๋ ์์ ์ ์ข ๋ ์์ฅ๊ณผ ์ ๊ทน์ ์ธ ์ํต์ ํ ์ ์๋๋ก ๊ทธ๋ ๊ฒ ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. The third portion of the regulation is related to reserve for reimbursement for lapsed, the surrender value of lapsed policies. For this also has to be improved, but we are not hearing concrete discussions regarding this portion. However, overall, we believe that we are coming closer to a time and point when the company can pay out dividends. When that time comes, we at the company will be communicating very closely with the market. ์, Risk Management Division Hong Seok-yong ์๋ฌด์ ๋๋ค. ๋ ๋ฒ์งธ ์ง๋ฌธํ์ ๊ทธ ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์ก์ด ๋ง์ ๊ฑฐ์ ๊ทธ๊ฑฐ์ ๋ํ ํฅํ์ ๊ด๋ฆฌ ๋ฐฉ์์ ๋ํด์ ๋ง์๋๋ฆฌ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. I am Hong from the Risk Management Division, and I will be addressing your question about the portion, about the fact that our company has a large portion of capital that has high sensitivity to changes in interest rates. ์ฒซ ๋ฒ์งธ ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์ก์ ํฐ ์์ธ์ ์ ํฌ๊ฐ ๊ทธ ์์ต์ฑ์ด ๋์ง๋ง ๋ง๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๊ธด ์ด๋ฆฐ์ด ๋ณดํ ๋ฑ์ ๋ํ ๋น์ค์ด ์ข ๋ง๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ด๊ณ ์. ์ด๊ฑฐ์ ๋ํ ๋์ฑ ์ผ๋ก ํด์ ์ต๊ทผ์ ์ ๊ท ๊ณ์ฝ์์ ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํด ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ฒ ์ ํ ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. The first reason why we have a higher portion of capital amount that is highly sensitive to interest rate is because the portion of children insurance products is quite high for our company. For this product, it is highly profitable. The duration is very long as it being a child insurance product. In order to address this, we are managing the sensitivity, interest rate sensitivity, recently for new business. ์ด๋ฅผ ์ํ์ฌ ์ฐ๋ง๊ธฐ ๋น์ค์ ํ๋ํ๊ณ ์์ผ๋ฉฐ ๋ณดํ๋ฃ ๊ฐฑ์ ๋น์ฉ์ ํ๋ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ๋ํ ์์ฐ ๋ถ๋ถ์์๋ ๊ทธ ์์ฐ ๋ฆฌ๋ฐธ๋ฐ์ฑ์ ํตํด ์ฅ๊ธฐ์ฑ ๋น์ค ํ๋์ ์ ๋๊ฑฐ๋ ๋น์ค์ ํ๋ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. In order to address this issue, we are increasing the portion of year-end maturity products and also renewal, products. For our asset side, we are taking on more long-term bonds and forward bonds. 3์ ๋ง ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก ๋๋ ์ด์ ๊ฐญ์ด ์ผ์ ์น ์์ ํ์ฌ 6์ ๋ง์๋ ์ผ์ ์์ผ๋ก ์์ ์น ๋ ๊ฐ์ ๋์๊ณ ์. ์ฐ๋ ๋ง์๋ ์ ํฌ๊ฐ ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ ๊ฒฝ๊ฐ์ ํตํด์ ์ด์ ์ ์ด๋ด๋ก ๊ด๋ฆฌํ ์์ ์ ๋๋ค. At the end of March, the duration gap was 3.7 years. In June, end of June, the duration gap was improved by 0.7 years to stand at three years. By the end of the year, we will be additionally reducing our interest rate risk to reduce that duration gap to 2.0 years. ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์ก์ด 10 BPs ํ๋ฝํ์ ๋ ๊ทธ 2.5 percentage points ๊ทธ ํฝ์ค ๋น์จ์ด ํ๋ฝ๋๋ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ์์๋๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ํฅํ์๋ ์ง์์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ ๊ฒฝ๊ฐ์ ํตํด์ ์ด ๊ธ์ก์ ์ถ์ํด ๋๊ฐ๋๋ก ํ ์์ ์ ๋๋ค. ์ด์์ ๋๋ค. If there is a reduction of 10 basis points, then this leads to a 2.5% point reduction or improvement in our K-ICS. We will be continuously making improvements on our interest rate risks. ๋ค, ์ง๋ฌธ ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. ๋ค์ ์ง๋ฌธ์ ๊ณ์ ๋ฐ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. Thank you for the question. Next question, please. ๋ค์์ผ๋ก ์ง๋ฌธํด ์ฃผ์ค ๋ถ์ ํํํฌ์์ฆ๊ถ์ ๊น๋ํ ๋์ ๋๋ค. The following question will be presented by Do-ha Kim from Hanwha Investment & Securities. Please go ahead with your question. ๋ค, ์ง๋ฌธ ๊ธฐํ ์ฃผ์ ์ ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. ์ ๋ณดํ๊ธ ์ชฝ์์ ํ๋๋ ๊ทธ, ๋๋ ์ด์ ๊ด๋ จํด๊ฐ์ง๊ณ ํ๋ ์ฌ์ญค๋ณด๋ ค๊ณ ํ๋๋ฐ์. ์ ํฌ ์์ค์ฐจ๊ฐ ์ ๋ถ๊ธฐ์ ๋นํด์ ๊ฐ์ ๋ ๊ฑฐ๋ ๋ง์ง๋ง ์ ๊ฐ ๊ทธ ์ ์ข ์ ๋ฐ์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ค๋ค ๋ณดํ๊ธ ์ฆ๊ฐ์ธ๊ฐ ์ข ์๋ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ์์ ์ค์ ๋ณดํ๊ธ์ ๋ฐ๋ก ๋ณด๊ณ ์๋๋ฐ, ์ ํฌ ๊ฐ์ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ ๋ฐ์ ๋ณดํ๊ธ์ด ์ ๋ถ๊ธฐ๋ ์ ์ฌํ ์์ค์ด์ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ๊ณ , YOY๋ก๋ ํ 16% ์ฆ๊ฐํ ๊ฒ์ผ๋ก ๋ณด์ ๋๋ค. ์์ค์ฐจ๋ ์์ค์ฐจ์ธ๋ฐ ์ ๋์ ์ธ ๋ณดํ๊ธ ์ฆ๊ฐ์ธ์ ๋ํ ๋ณ๋์ ํ์ ์ด ์ข ๋ ์์ด์ผ ํ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ์์์. ํน์ ์ด๋ฒ ๋ถ๊ธฐ์ ํ์ ํ์ ๋๋ ์ด๋ฌํ ๋ณดํ๊ธ ์ฆ๊ฐ์ ์์ธ์ด ์ค์, ๋น์ค์์ผ๋ก ๋๋์ด ์ฃผ์ค ์ ์๋์ง, ๋น์ค์ ๋ด์์๋ ํน์ ํน์ ๋ด๋ณด์์ ์ํด์จ ์ฌ๋ผ์ค๋ ๋ถ๋ถ๋ค์ด ์บ์น๋๋ ๊ฒ ์๋์ง ๊ณต์ ํด ์ฃผ์๋ฉด ๋์์ด ์ข ๋ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ๊ณ ์. ๋๋ ์ด์ ๊ด๋ จํด์๋, ์ ํฌ๊ฐ ๊ฐ์ ์ QOQ๋ก ๋ง์ด ํด์ฃผ์ จ์ง๋ง ๊ทธ๋๋ ์ ๋๊ฐ์ผ๋ก๋ ์์ง ๋์ ์ํ์ธ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ์๋ฐ ์ต๊ทผ์ ๊ธ์ต๋น๊ตญ์์ ๊ทธ ๋๋ ์ด์ ์ธ๋งค์นญ ์ฌํํ๋ฉด ์ ๊ณ์ฝ์ ์กฐ๊ธ ์ง์ฅ์ด ์์ ์ ์๋ ์์ ์ธ๊ธ์ ํด์ฃผ์๋๋ฐ, ํด์ธ์ฌ๋ฅผ ์ฐธ๊ณ ํ์ ๋๋ ์๋ง ๋ง์ด๋์ค, ํ๋ฌ์ค ๋ง์ด๋์ค 1, 2๋ ์ ๋์ ๊ฐญ์ด ๊ธฐ์ค์ด ๋์ง ์์๊น ํ๋ ์์ธก์ด ์๋ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ์ต๋๋ค. ๋ง์ฝ์ ์ ํฌ ์ฐ๋ง ๋ชฉํ์น๋ก๋ ๋ง์ด๋์ค 2๋ ์ด๋ด๋ผ๊ณ ๋ง์์ฃผ์ จ๋๋ฐ ๊ทธ ์์ค์์๋ ์์ ํ๋ค๊ณ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ์กฐ๊ธ ์ด๋ ค์ธ ๊ฒ ๊ฐ์์์. ์ ํฌ ์ด๊ฑฐ ๊ฐ์, ๊ธ์ต๋น๊ตญ ์คํ ์ค ๊ฐ์ํ์ฌ ์ ๊ณ์ฝ ๊ด๋ จํด์ ๋ญ ์ด๋ค ๊ณํ์ ๊ฐ๊ณ ๊ณ์ ์ง, ํ๋B๊ฐ ์์ผ์ ์ง ๊ถ๊ธํฉ๋๋ค. ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. Thank you for the opportunity to ask a question. I have two questions. One is related to the claims and the second one is related to duration. I know that there have been improvements made in the claim variance. However, I understand that in the insurance industry in Korea, overall claims have actual claims have gone up. If so, I would like to know what your actual claim that have been paid out was. There should be some information related to this. For these claims that have been paid out, what is the portion between non-indemnity and indemnity? For the non-indemnity, is there a particular insurance product that led to increases into the claim payout? Next, I want to ask a question related to duration. I know that there have been improvements into your asset liability duration matching improvement quarter-over-quarter. I understand that the Financial Supervisory regulators are looking into this duration mismatch issue and that this may, in the future, have an impact on new business. Looking at overseas, it seems that the standard may become ยฑ1 year. You said that by the end of the year, your duration gap will be 2.0 years. This might not be safe yet. Are there any additional plans related to new businesses as a plan B to reduce your duration gap additionally? ์ฅ๊ธฐ ์ ๋ฌด๋ณธ๋ถ์ฅ ์ต์์ค ์๋ฌด์ ๋๋ค. ๋ณดํ๊ธ ๊ด๋ จํด์ ๋จผ์ ๋ง์๋๋ฆฌ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. ์ด ๋ณดํ๊ธ์ ์ฆ๊ฐ๋ ๊ฐ ์ฌ์ ๋งค์ถ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ์ข ์ํฅ์ด ์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์ ๋จผ์ ์ํด์จ๋ก ๋จผ์ ์ผ๋จ ๋ง์์ ์ข ๋๋ฆด๊น ํ๋๋ฐ์. ์ค์์ ๋น์ฌ๊ฐ ์๋ฐ๊ธฐ ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก 2% ํ๋ฝํ์๊ณ , ์ค์ ์ธ๋ 2.4% ์ฆ๊ฐํ์ต๋๋ค. ํฉ์ฐ์ผ๋ก๋ 1.4% ์ ๋ ์์น์ ํ์์ต๋๋ค. I am Choi. I am in charge of the long-term insurance products division. Regarding your question on the claims that have been paid out, this depends on the revenue of individual insurance companies. That will have an impact. I would like to explain the claims payout based on loss ratio. For the first half of 2025, for indemnity, we saw a reduction of loss ratio of 2%. For non-indemnity, it was 2.4%. Overall, there was an increase of 2.4% for non-indemnity and therefore overall it was a 1.4% increase. For the non-life insurance sector in Korea, the loss ratio improved by 4%-5% whereas we were better than the overall industry. In terms of the actual loss, the claims that have been paid out for our company, it was increased. That amount was increased by 10%, whereas for the industry it was 15%-9%. It is our understanding that actual the loss amount due to claim payout, our company fared better than did our peers. I am Hong Seok-yong from the Risk Management Division. I will be addressing the duration question. First of all, the regulators regarding the ALM regulation through their press release, have stated that they have not determined the regulation and that it will be done gradually. FSS also has stated that this will be done gradually and that it will be, it will take time. Regarding the insurance liability discount rate, the LOT of that being extended from the current 23 years, it is stated that it will be gradually extended starting from 2027. Even in 2027, it won't be extended suddenly. The 23-year LOT will just be extended to 24 years. If this is adopted in 2027, then we believe our duration gap can be maintained and managed within 1.5 years. Even if such a system is adopted in Korea, about the ALM management, the impact on our new business will be limited. Separate and aside from the changes in the regulation, we plan to manage our duration gap in the mid to long term within one year. I am Kim, and I am in the marketing planning division. I would like to be talking about our strategy in terms of interest rate sensitivity of new business. First of all, it is our strategy to increase the portion of year-end maturity insurance products, the composition of this. Compared to the end of last year, in the first half of this year, we were able to increase the portion of the year-end maturity insurance products by three percentage points. In addition to that, for the insurance products that have high interest rate sensitivity, we will set limitations on this. We will be managing the sales of our various insurance products based on the product type and the maturity of those products as a portfolio. In particular, for the child insurance products that have a high sensitivity to interest rates, we will induce and encourage the year-end maturity products. Thank you for the question. Next question, please. The following question will be presented by Hee-yeon Lim from Shinhan Investment and Securities. Please go ahead with your question. Thank you for the good results. I have two parts in my question. The first part is related to changes in the regulatory system and the second is related to CSM. Relating to the systems, I would like to ask you about the policy surrender return value. When do you think this policy will be adopted, and when do you think there will be improvements here? What types of recommendations do you think the regulators will be adopting from the industry? Next question is about your new business. It seems that you have quite high quality new business recently. What did you think is the competition landscape? The next question is related to caregiver claims. I understand that this care payment for caregivers, and it is having a negative impact on your loss ratio, and that there will be some discussions according to the regulators, regarding improvements made to this item. Could you give us some insights into that? Next, related to CSM, can you give us a breakdown of the adjustments made to your CSM? It seems that your CSM quality has improved, the multiple has improved. Is there a particular insurance line that has contributed to the improvement of CSM? Is there an internal index that you use to assess your CSM quality and level? I am Kyung-Dong Kim from the Actuarial Division regarding reserve for surrender value. It has been three years since this has been in operation. Compared to what had initially been planned, the consensus within the industry that the regulation is too severe. ์ง๊ธ ๊ทธ ์ดํ์ ํด์ฝํ๊ธ๊ธ์ค๋น๊ธ ์ ๋ฆฝ ์์ค์ ๋ณด๋ฉด, ๊ทธ๊ฒ๋ณด๋ค๋ ๊ทธ ์ดํ์ ์ ๊ณ์ฝ์ ์ํ ์ ๋ฆฝ์ก์ด ๋๋ถ๋ถ์ ์ฐจ์งํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. The justification of adopting this initially was that it will protect existing policyholders as there have been changes to the new IFRS system. Looking at the way the reserves are being accumulated, it is not actually coming from mostly from the existing policies but through the new businesses. ํด์ฝํ๊ธ๊ธ์ค๋น๊ธ ์ ๋ฆฝ์ก์ด ์ข ๊ณผ๋ํ๊ฒ ์ฆ๊ฐ๋๊ณ ์๋ ๋ถ๋ถ์ ๋ํด์ ์ฌ๋ฌ ๊ฐ์ง ๊ฐ์ ์์ ์ง๊ธ ์๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํ๊ณ ์๋๋ฐ, ๊ทธ์ค์์ ์ง๊ธ ์ต๊ทผ์ ๊ทธ ์๊ฒฌ์ด ๋ชจ์์ง๊ณ ์๋ ๋ถ๋ถ์ ๊ทธ ์ ๊ณ์ฝ์ ์ํ ๊ทธ ์ ๋ฆฝ์ก์ ๋ํ ๊ฐ์ , ๊ทธ ๋ถ๋ถ์ ์ง์ค์ ์ผ๋ก ์ง๊ธ ๋ ผ์๋ฅผ ํ๊ณ ์๋ ์ค์ ๋๋ค. That is why the reserves for the surrender value have been accumulated quite excessively, and that is why there have been discussions about this recently. Most of the discussions on making a improvements to this system is related to new business. ์ง๊ธ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์ผ๋ก ์ด์ ๊ธ์ต๋น๊ตญ์์ ์ด๋ค ๋ฐ์์ด ์๋ ๊ฑด ์๋์ง๋ง, ์ ๊ณ ์ ์ฒด์ ์ผ๋ก ๋ณผ ๋ ์ด ์ ๋๊ฐ ์ง์ ๊ฐ๋ฅํ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ์ข ์ด๋ ต๋ค๋ ์ธ์์ด ์๊ธฐ ๋๋ฌธ์, ์ด๋ค ๋ญ ์์ ์ ํน์ ํ ์ ์์ง๋ง ์ ๋ ๊ฐ์ ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ ํฌ๋ค๋ผ๊ณ ์๊ฐํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ์ด์์ ๋๋ค. Although the financial regulators, have not, specified and, discussed this in concrete, yet the industry believes that, this system is not sustainable. Therefore, it is believed, within the industry that at some time in point, there will be improvements to the current, reserve for surrender value system. ์ฅ๊ธฐ์ํ๋ณธ๋ถ์ฅ ์ค๊ฒฝ์์ ๋๋ค. ๊ฐ๋ณ์ธ ๋ณด์ฅ ๊ด๋ จ๋ผ์ ๋ต๋ณ์ ๋๋ฆฌ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. I am Yoon, head of the Long-Term Insurance Products, and I will be talking about the coverage for caregivers. ๊ฐ๋ณ์ธ ๋ณด์ฅ ๊ด๋ จํ ๋ด๋ณด๋ 2024๋ ๋ง๋ถํฐ 2025๋ 1๋ถ๊ธฐ๊น์ง ์์ฅ์์ ๊ฐ์ฅ ํ๋งค ์ด์๊ฐ ๋์๋ ๋ด๋ณด๋ ๋ง์ต๋๋ค. ๋น์ฌ๋ ์ญ์ ํ๋งค๋ ํ์ง๋ง ๋น์ฌ๋ ์๋์ ์ผ๋ก ์ข ์์ ์ ์ธ ์ด์ ํ๋งค๋ฅผ ํ๊ณ ์. ํ์ฌ ์ํด์จ ์์ผ๋ก๋ ํฌ๊ฒ ์ด์๊ฐ ๋ฐ์ํ๊ณ ์๋ ๋ด๋ณด๋ ์๋๋๋ค. ์ ๊ณ์ ๋ค๋ฅธ ํ์ฌ๋ค์ ์ํด์จ ๋ชจ๋ํฐ๋ง์ ์ข ๊ฐํํ๊ณ ๋ณด์ฅ ๋ด์ฉ ๊ฐ์ ์ด๋ ์ด๋ฐ ๋ถ๋ถ๋ค์ ์ง์์ ์ผ๋ก ๊ฒํ ํด์ ๋ฌธ์ ๊ฐ ์๊ฒผ์ ๊ฒฝ์ฐ ์ ์ํ ๋์ํ๋๋ก ํ ์์ ์ ๋๋ค. ์ด์์ ๋๋ค. It is true that coverage for caregiver costs was a major issue in the end of 2024 and first quarter of 2025. This was a major sales issue. For our company, we have been selling this product, insurance product. However, it was done quite stably. In terms of the loss ratio of this insurance product, it is not in a serious state at all. However, we are reviewing the loss ratio of the caregiver coverage insurance product of other companies keenly. As soon as we identify any issues, we will be addressing them as they come out. ์ฅ๊ธฐ์์ ๋ณธ๋ถ์ฅ ์ต์์ค ์๋ฌด์ ๋๋ค. CSM ๋ฐฐ์ ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๋ถ๋ถ ์ข ๋ง์๋๋ฆฌ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. ํ์ฌ ํ๋งค๋๋ ๋ด๋ณด ์ค์ CSM ๋ฐฐ์๊ฐ ๋์ ๋ด๋ณด๋ ์น๋ฃ ์ค์ฌ์ ๋ด๋ณด๋ค์ ๋๋ค. ์ ์ฃผ์ ์น๋ฃ๋น๋ผ๋ ๊ฐ ํญ์์น๋ฃ, ๊ทธ ๋ค์์ ์ฝ๋ฌผ์น๋ฃ, ๊ทธ ๋ค์์ ์ฌ์ฅ๊ณผ ๋ ๊ด๋ จ๋ 2 major ์ง๋จ ์น๋ฃ ๋ฑ์ ๋ด๋ณด๋ค์ด ๊ณ CSM ๋ฐฐ์๋ก ํ์ฑํ๊ณ ์๊ณ , ๋น์ฌ์์๋ ํด๋น ๋ด๋ณด์ ์์ฑ ์ ๋ถ๊ณผํ์ฌ, ์ ์ ๋์ ์ข ์ฆ๋์ํค๋ ๋ ธ๋ ฅ์ ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. I am in the Long-Term Insurance Product Business, Choi, and I would like to talk about the CSM. Out of the insurance product that we are currently selling, the ones that have a high CSM are the insurance products that are related to treatments such as cancer treatment, anti-cancer chemotherapy, and cerebral and vascular disease related items and diagnosis of these two major diseases. We are adjusting the inflow of these types of insurance products. CSM ๋ฐฐ์๋ ํ๊ฐ๋ก ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ํ๋ฉด์, ์์ ํ์ฅ์์, ๋ฉ๊ธฐ๊ฐ ๊ธด ๊ณ์ฝ๋ค์ ์ ์ ์ ๋๋ฆฌ๊ณ CSM ๋ฐฐ์๊ฐ ์ด๋ ์ ๋ ๋๊ฒ ํ์ฑ๋์ด์ผ ๋๋ค๋ ์์ ์ ๊ทธ ๋ฌธํ์ ๊ทธ ์ธ์์ ์ข ์๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ ์ข ์ก์ ๊ฑธ๋ก ๊ทธ๋ ๊ฒ ํ์ฌ ๋ณด๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. CSM multiplier, multiple is being used as an index of evaluating our people and into the sales. If you go out in the field, there is an understanding and culture and awareness that it is important to have a long-term premium payment and sales of insurance products that have a high CSM multiple. ์ธ๋ณดํ ๊ธฐ์ค ๋ฐฐ์ 8x๋ฅผ ๊ณ์ ์ ์งํ๋๋ก ๋ชฉํ ํ์ฅ๊ณผ ๋ณธ์ฌ๊ฐ ๋์ผํ ๋ชฉํ ๊ธฐ์ค์ผ๋ก ์ง๊ธ ์์ง์ด๊ณ ์๋ค๋ ์ ๋ค์ ํ๋ฒ ๋ง์๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค. For our healthcare insurance, we are striving and targeting to maintain the CSM at 18x. This is, this level of 18x is a target at the headquarters and also at the sales force in the field. Regarding adjustments of CSM in terms of the claim variance and other variances, we have seen a reduction of KRW 100 billion. This has been improved thanks to efforts to increase our persistency ratio. Thank you. Next question, please. The following question will be presented by Jae Won Lee from HSBC. Please go ahead with your question. Yeah. I am Lee from the commercial insurance product, and I will be addressing this question on deterioration of profitability and the reduction in your retention rate of commercial products. The reason why we experienced deterioration of our profitability YoY was because of the two major property related losses incidents that occurred in the second quarter, which led to an overall increase in our losses. This has also led to a reduction in our retention rate. Due to these two major incidents that took place, it led to an XOL of KRW 25 billion. This has led to a reduction of our retention rate of 4%. If this effect is eliminated, then our retention rate is similar to the previous year. In addition to that, in the first half of this year, we saw an increase of our overseas insurance product sales, and that is what also led to a decrease in our retention rate. current ์ํฉ์ ๋ชจ๋ ๋ฐ์ํด ๋ณด๋ฉด ์ ํฌ ์ ์ฒด์ ์ธ ๋ณด์ ์จ์ ์ ๋ ๋์ผ ์์ค์ด๊ณ ์. ์ ํฌ ํ๋ฐ๊ธฐ ๋ณด์ ์ ๋ต๋ ๋ณํ ์์ด ๊ณ์ํด์ ์ ๋ ๊ณผ ๋น์ทํ ์์ค์ ์ ์งํ ๊ณํ์ ๋๋ค. ์ด์์ ๋๋ค. If we exclude the XOL reinstatement premium effect and this overseas insurance sales effect, the retention ratio is similar to last year and we will be maintaining our strategies to maintain a similar level in the second half of this year. ์ฅ๊ธฐ์ํ๋ณธ๋ถ์ฅ ์ค๊ฒฝ์์ ๋๋ค. ํ๋ฐ๊ธฐ CSM ๋ฐฐ์ ๊ด๋ฆฌ ๊ด๋ จํด์ ๋ต๋ณ ๋๋ฆฌ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. I am Yoon from the Long Term Insurance Product Division, and I will be explaining our strategy for managing CSM in the second half of 2025. ๋ง์ํ์ จ๋ฏ์ด ์์ ๋ฅ ์ ์ธํํ๋ฉด CSM ๋ฐฐ์๊ฐ ์์นํ๋ ๊ฒ์ ๋น์ฐํ ๋ง๊ณ ์. ๋น์ฌ๋ ๋์ 2024๋ ๊ทธ ๋ค์์ 2025๋ , 2๋ ๊ฐ ๊ฒฝํ์์จ์ 2์ฐจ๋ก ์กฐ์ ์ ํจ์ผ๋ก ์ธํด์ CSM ๋ฐฐ์์ ํฐ ํญ์ ์์น์ ๊ฐ์ ธ์์ต๋๋ค. It is true that if the credit expected crediting interest rate is reduced that the CSM will increase. In the case of our company in 2024 and 2025, we made adjustments to our experience table, which led to an increase in our premium, and this has improved our CSM greatly. ์ต๊ทผ ์ผ๋ถ ์ฌ์์ ์์ ๋ฅ ์ธํ๋ฅผ August๋ถํฐ ์ํ์ ํ๋๋ฐ์. ๋น์ฌ๋ ํ์ฌ ๋๋น ํ์ฌ ์์ ๋ฅ ์ด 2.8% ์ ์ฉ์ ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ์ต๊ทผ์ ์ธํํ ํ์ฌ๋ค์ ๋ณด๋ฉด 3.0%๋ฅผ ์์ ๋ฅ ๋ก ์ ์ฉํ๊ณ ์๋ ๊ฒ์ 2.75%๋ก ๋ฎ์ถ ์ํฉ์ด๊ณ ์. ๋น์ฌํ๊ณ ์ง๊ธ OBP ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ ๋๊ณ ์์ง๋ง ํ์ฌ ์์ค์ ๊ณ์ ์ง์์ ์ผ๋ก ๋น์ฌ ์ข ๋ณด์์ ์ผ๋ก ์ด์ํด์๋ค๊ณ ํ๋จ์ ํ๊ณ ์๊ณ ์. ๊ทธ๋ผ์๋ ๋ถ๊ตฌํ๊ณ ์์ฅ ์ํฉ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ์ ์ธ์ ๋ ์ง ์์ ๋ฅ ์กฐ์ ์ ํ ์ ์๋๋ก ์ค๋น๋ฅผ ํ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ์์ง ์๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ํน์ ํด ๋๊ณ ์์ง๋ ์์ต๋๋ค. ์ด์์ ๋๋ค. For this anticipated interest rate recently, other companies have reduced this to 2.8%, 2.75%. However, this has been reduced from 3% to 2.75%, whereas we have been maintaining it at 2.8%. There is a difference of 5 basis points, but we are being a bit conservative in this area. However, we will be moving tightly according to changes in the market situation. ์, ๋ฆฌ์คํฌ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ณธ๋ถ์ฅ ํ์ํ์ ๋๋ค. Duration ๊ท์ ์ ๋ฐ๋ฅธ ์ ์ํ ํ๋งค ์ํฅ์ ๋ํด์ ๋ต๋ณ๋๋ฆฌ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. This is Hong from the Risk Management Division. I will be answering the question on the duration issue and, the influence that this may have on our new business. ์์ ๋ง์๋๋ ธ๋ฏ์ด ๊ธ์ต๋น๊ตญ์์๋ duration ๊ด๋ จ๋ ๊ท์ ์ ๋ํ ํ์ ๋ ๋ฐ ์๋ค๊ณ ์๊ธฐํ๊ณ ์. 1, 2๋ ๋ด์๋ ๋ฌธ์ ๋ ๊ฐ๋ฅ์ฑ์ด ๋ฎ๋ค๊ณ ๋ณด๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ์ด์ ๊ด๊ณ์์ด ์ฐ๋ฆฌ ํ์ฌ๋ duration ๊ด๋ฆฌ๋ฅผ 1.5๋ ์์ 2.0 ์ด๋ด๋ก ๊ด๋ฆฌํ ์์ ์ ๋๋ค. ์ด์์ ๋๋ค. As I have stated earlier regarding this duration issue, the regulators have stated that they have not determined anything yet, which means that the possibility of this becoming an issue in the market within one year and two is very slim. However, regardless of this, it is our company strategy to manage our duration gap at 1.5-two years. ๋ค, ์ง๋ฌธ ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. ๋ค์ ์ง๋ฌธ์ ๊ณ์ ๋ฐ๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. Thank you for the question. We will go on to the next one. ๋ค์์ผ๋ก ์ง๋ฌธํด ์ฃผ์ค ๋ถ์ Daol Investment & Securities์ Jiwon Kim ๋์ ๋๋ค. The following question will be presented by Jiwon Kim from Daol Investment and Securities. Please go ahead with your question. ์, ๋ค. ์ง์ ๊น์ฃผ์ , ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. ์ ๋ ๋น ๋ฅด๊ฒ ํ๋ ์ฌ์ญค๋ณด๊ณ ์ถ์๋ฐ์. ์๋ฌ๋ฌ ํ์จ ์ผ๋ง๋น ๋ณดํ ๊ธ์ต ๋น์ฉ์ด ๊ฐ์๋๋์ง ์ ๋๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ญค๋ณด๊ณ ์ถ์ต๋๋ค. ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. I have a quick question related to the claim operation costs related to the Korean, the foreign exchange rate with the dollar. ์ฌ๋ฌด๋ณธ๋ถ์ฅ ๊น๊ฒฝ๋์ ๋๋ค. ํ์จ ๊ด๋ จํด์ ๋ณดํ ๋ถ์ฑ์ ์ํฅ์ฃผ๋ ๊ฑฐ๋ ์ผ๋ฐ ๋ณดํ์ ํด์ธ ์์ ์ธ๋ฐ์. ๋ฑ ์ ํํ ๊ฑด ์ด์ ์๋์ง๋ง, 1 KRW, per 1 KRW 100 million ์ ๋ ์ํฅ์ ์ฃผ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. I'm from the Actuary Division regarding FX rate for our insurance liability. The foreign exchange rate is related to our overseas ceding. I cannot say exactly, but one difference will have an impact of KRW 100 million. ์ง๋ฌธ์ด ๋ ์ด์ ์์ผ์๋ฉด ์ด์์ผ๋ก ์ปจํผ๋ฐ์ค ์ฝ์ ๋ง์น๋๋ก ํ๊ฒ ์ต๋๋ค. ์ถ๊ฐ์ ์ธ ๋ฌธ์์ฌํญ์ ์ ํฌ IR ๋ด๋น์๋ค์๊ฒ ์ธ์ ๋ ์ง ์ฐ๋ฝ ์ฃผ์๊ธฐ ๋ฐ๋๋๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ผ ์ฐธ์ฌํด ์ฃผ์ ํฌ์์, ์ ๋๋ฆฌ์คํธ๋ถ๋ค๊ป ์ง์ฌ์ผ๋ก ๊ฐ์ฌ๋๋ฆฝ๋๋ค. ๊ฐ์ฌํฉ๋๋ค. If we have no further questions, we will conclude our conference call. We would like to thank our investors and analysts for participating. If you have any other further questions, please contact the IR team. Thank you very much.
Loading workspace