Hello, and welcome to today's conference. Welcome to the ABN AMRO Q3 2022 Analyst and Investor Conference Call. Please note this conference is being recorded. For the duration of the call, your lines will be on listen only. However, you will have the opportunity to ask questions at the end of the presentation. This can be done by pressing star one on your telephone keypad to register your question. If you require assistance at any point, please press star zero and you will be connected to an operator. I will now hand over to your host, Mr. Robert Swaak, CEO, to begin today's conference. Thank you. Thank you very much. Good morning, everyone. Welcome to ABN AMRO's Q3 Results. As always, joined by Lars Kramer, our CFO, and Tanja Cuppen, our CRO. I'll update you on the main topics again for this quarter before we start the Q&A session. Let's get to the main events on slide 2. The strong increase in our results reflects improved underlying operating income, as well as a number of profitable investments. Our deposit margin showed a strong recovery driven by the rapid rise of interest rates during the year. Client activity remained strong during the third quarter, although we see higher energy prices and the war in Ukraine impacting consumer and producer confidence. Underlying costs came down as we reduced external FTEs working on AML and IT by around 700. We again recovered impairments on non-performing loans this quarter, reducing our non-performing exposure significantly. We have a clean balance sheet and in the current difficult environment, we feel we are well positioned. Our capital position remains strong and looking ahead to the next quarter, we are flagging that the change in TLTRO terms is expected to impact our Q4 results by around EUR 250 million pre-tax. Let's turn to slide three. I'd like to start with a few words on the delivery of our strategy execution. Nowadays, there's no real need anymore to visit a retail branch, as virtually all of our products and services can be handled online. Now, this is a direct result of our investments we've made in our traditional, digital, and online channels and allows us to further reduce our location footprint. Over the past years, we transformed our mortgage business so clients can take out a new mortgage and manage their existing mortgage online. The success of our online mortgage channel is also demonstrated by the fact that we are currently market leader. Now, it is important that our elderly clients also receive the service they need. We have dedicated coaches which the elderly can call, and if needed, we will visit the client's home. The service is highly valued and generally preferred to visiting a branch. Moving on to wealth management, our sustainable investment offering continues to attract clients with a further EUR 1 billion of assets under management added. Corporate banking is continuing to show strength in client activity with asset volumes growing in Northwest Europe. A new proposition is our ID&Pay application, an example of embedded banking. ID&Pay aims to be Europe's first payment and identification service provider, and this application allows third parties to offer their clients digital identification and payment functionality using the bank's secure infrastructure. On the next slide, I'll highlight the main Dutch economic indicators. The Dutch economy is still showing a decent performance. Unemployment remains low, and the same goes for bankruptcies. We expect GDP to decline by the end of 2022 as demand weakens. The effect of higher energy prices is starting to be felt by households leading to lower consumer spending. The government recently announced a support package of around EUR 37 billion, partly compensating households and businesses for higher energy prices. This should dampen somewhat the impact on purchasing power, especially for lower income households. Given the backdrop of a worsening economic outlook, I want to highlight some key points demonstrating that our loan book is well positioned. Let's turn to the next slide on our mortgage portfolio. Our largest portfolio consists of Dutch mortgages, so let me give you a qualitative view on the risks in this portfolio. During the previous financial crisis, house prices bottomed out in the course of 2013, following a 20% decline from the previous high. At that point, over one-third of our mortgages were under water. As you can see from the bottom chart, this resulted in impairments rising to around 25 basis points during 2012 and 2013. Actual loss rates over the whole downturn are much lower, and over the period shown, impairments averaged around 5 basis points. Now moving to our current mortgage portfolio. If we would experience a similar decline in house prices, only 11% of mortgages at risk of negative equity, so a significant improvement. Materialization of losses in the mortgage book is closely linked to unemployment, as you can see from the bottom chart. Currently, the unemployment rate is still very low at 3.7%, so we expect unemployment to slowly rise going forward, dampened by the Dutch government support. All in all, we are very comfortable with the risks in our mortgage book. Turning to slide 6, I'll update you on our third quarter results, starting with our loan developments. During the third quarter, our mortgage portfolio grew by EUR 1.7 billion. Our market share increased to 19% in Q3, and we've held on to our market leader position since February. Corporate lending maintained commercial momentum with the loan book growing by EUR 1.8 billion. A healthy one-fifth of the corporate deal pipeline is now due to new clients, and we are showing further growth on the back of our Northwest Europe strategy. Deposits remained stable this quarter following strong growth in Q2. Turning to slide 7, I'll update you on how positive rates are feeding through into our NII. During the third quarter, our deposit margins recovered strongly. The magnitude of the increase is unprecedented and reflects the rapid increase of central bank rates. Going forward, we expect margins will be increasingly driven by competitive forces rather than higher interest rates. Some competitors are already offering interest on savings accounts, and we will raise our rate to 25 basis points as of December first. Mortgage prepayment penalties have now bottomed out, so I expect no further drag going forward. Reflecting the strong Q3 results, we now expect full-year NII of around EUR 5.3 billion, excluding incidentals. Now on to slide eight, on fees and other income. Fees were resilient quarter-on-quarter and up 7% year-on-year. Both clearing and payment services fees showed strong performance year-on-year. Stock markets were down, leading to less trading activity and lower asset management fees. Our income was up significantly. In total, EUR 175 million was recorded as incidental in other income as all business segments booked gains from divestments. Excluding these divestments, other income was up EUR 108 million due to strong results for ALM and an equity stake revaluation. While significant gains were booked this quarter, unwinding the TLTRO interest rate hedge will impact other income in Q4. Now, the impact from unwinding the hedge, adjusting for remaining TLTRO benefit under the original terms, is around EUR 250 million. I'll discuss our costs now on slide 9. The underlying costs declined as external FTEs came down by more than 700, mainly in the areas of anti-money laundering and IT. With AML, FTE reductions mainly took place in the business as usual operations, with a modest FTE reduction in the remediation projects. As we've mentioned before, we don't expect to absorb the impact of the collective labor agreement in our full-year cost guidance of EUR 5.3 billion. The new CLA will add around EUR 60 million to personnel costs this year, rising to EUR 120 million by 2024. For our 2024 target, we assumed an overall inflation of between 2% and 3%, and the current CLA adds around 3% inflation to our personnel expenses. It is clear that in the current environment, we'll need to work hard to meet our cost target, which we formulated back in 2020. However, having the organization work towards an absolute cost base does enforce focus and discipline, and I'd like to keep the bar high on cost reductions. Turning to slide 10 on impairments and asset quality. We took around EUR 60 million of additions in stage one and two, mainly related to the worsened economic outlook. In addition, we added EUR 30 million management overlay related to the government plans for reducing the overall nitrogen emissions in the Netherlands. Offsetting these overlays are sizable releases in stage three. These are mainly driven by a number of defaulted loans which were successfully restructured or cured. Early in this presentation, I highlighted the quality of our mortgage portfolio. Back in 2020, we made the strategic decision to clean up our loan book, winding down what subsequently became our non-core exposures. Currently, our non-core exposures are very limited and well provisioned for. Turning to our core corporate lending portfolio, as you can see from the table, we are in good shape. We have just over EUR 3 billion in stage three exposures of corporate loans. Non-performing exposures declined further this quarter as we successfully restructured and cured several loans, while other clients repaid or returned to stage two. In summary, a clean balance sheet, and with that, we're well-positioned in case of a downturn. Let's then turn to slide 11 for capital. Well-capitalized with a Basel III CET1 ratio of 15.2% and a Basel IV ratio of around 16%. This quarter, we deducted the conditional share buyback of EUR 250 million from capital, leading to an impact of around 20 basis points. Around half of the increase in credit risk RWA is due to removing the SME support factor from part of our SME portfolio, where we need additional data from our clients. Also, certain models were changed from advanced to foundation IRB. Over the past few years, significant Basel III model add-ons were taken, as well as moving some advanced models to foundation or standardized. Going forward, we may experience further impact from the regular and ongoing model updates. However, the risk of further RWA increases has diminished. Basel IV RWAs are now below Basel III, reflecting the increased conservatism now included in our Basel III credit RWAs. Let me summarize. We delivered another good set of results, which has boosted our year-to-date return on equity to 9.4%. NII is benefiting from the return to positive interest rates. We saw underlying costs coming down as external FTEs declined. Now, these positive jobs will then support our results as we go into an uncertain future. Our balance sheet is well-positioned for the uncertain times ahead. Dutch mortgages are in much better shape compared to the last downturn. We cleaned up our balance sheet by winding down our non-core exposure. We have a strong capital position, and the full-year results are taking shape. We are evaluating next steps, and I'll update you on capital returns at Q4. With that, I'd like to ask the operator to open the call for questions. Thank you. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question or make a contribution, please press star one. Please limit yourselves to two questions per person. The first question comes from the line of Benoît Pétrarque of Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning. Two questions on my side. The first one is on net interest income. Obviously, back to May, you provided us a very useful update on NII sensitivity to a forward rate scenario. I mean, rates have been moving up quite sharply since then. I was wondering if you could just, direction-wise, update us on where we might land for 2023 and 2024. I think back then you kind of capped the deposit margin at around historical levels as from 2023. Where are you or where will you be, let's say, at the end of the year after the 25 basis points increase in deposit rates versus your historical deposit margin? Are you getting close to that level, or do you think there's still a bit of upside in 2023? I was also conceptually trying to understand why an historical deposit margin is a good proxy for future NII developments, given that, you know, banks and the entire banking sector has been suffering from a very low and depressed deposit margin for quite some years, almost 10 years now. The second question is on capital returns. How do you read the comments made by De Nederlandsche Bank? Does that make you a bit more, well, cautious ahead of a potential update in the fourth quarter? Or do you still think that, you know, ABN is in a very strong position and therefore we should be hopeful for a capital distribution? If I just may on the DPS for 2022, there are quite a number of positive one-offs at the end of the day in the EPS. You know, will you calculate your DPS on the 50% reported EPS or do we need to kind of adjust the DPS for dividend calculation? Thank you very much. Thanks, Benoît. On On your last question, it will continue to be the 50%. We're not gonna change that. On your second question on capital return, the statements by the Dutch regulator are, you know, clearly understood given the economic conditions. It doesn't change our constructive dialogue we have with the regulator on any capital return. We still expect to update you at Q4. Lars, Q4 NII. Yeah, Benoît, on the NII, I mean, we really use an approach where we do look at the historical margin, and that's how we've done our estimations, and that's why also the sensitivity that we put out at the end of Q1, we use that as basis. Now, clearly, with the very sharp increases that we've had over the last, you know, 3-5 months, that level of historical margin, we've been getting closer to it. We're not there yet, so there is definitely some room for some further upside. The other area that we also clearly have in terms of further sensitivity going forward is also around our equity position. That is also something that stays sensitive going forward. The areas that ultimately when we put that sensitivity together in Q1, we also, you know, said it was very much focused on the liability side, ultimately, and focused on the interest rate side. I mean, clearly, we also do still have some potential for growth, you know, both on the liabilities as well as on the asset side. Okay. No update at this point. Also, is the EUR 200 million still for next year? Delta for next year is still. Well, looks quite conservative. Is that what you read your comment? I mean, that sensitivity in terms of quantum, but it's clearly been pulled forward. You know, so you've got to look at the year one and the year two, where the biggest increases were projected, and that timeframe has been pulled forward. Okay. Great. Thank you very much. Thanks, Benoît. The next question comes from the line of Benjamin Goy of Deutsche Bank. Please go ahead. Yes. Hi, good morning. Also was wondering in terms of capital return, will the withholding tax play any role in the timing or the scope of share buyback? Then, secondly, if I hear you correctly on the 2024 cost, you don't want to change it, the target, but maybe you can discuss a bit more the moving parts since you gave that guidance almost two years ago. Obviously, a lot has changed. Yeah, maybe give a bit more color because it would be a substantial reduction, which I think is for almost any bank in Europe, very difficult to achieve. Thank you very much. Yeah. Thank you. I'll take the first question. Lars, you can take the question on withholding tax. So on your first question, we're gonna update you at Q4. Right now we're seeing a Basel IV of around 16%. At the time when we talked about the 13%-15%, we indicated that that 15% is a threshold. What I've said in previous quarters is that as long as it's not constraining in our considerations, I wouldn't feel a need to change that 15%. Now, we're still at Basel IV around 16%. So we're gonna complete our review on potential capital return at Q4. We'll then update you also accordingly. On the withholding tax, that's not really something that drives us. Okay, good to hear that you do have more flexibility there. On costs, 2024, any more color you can give other than the CLA which comes on top? Yeah. The color I would give on the cost for 2024, clearly this is a process we've been in since 2020, and it certainly is something that is the cost levers that we've talked about before are in part back-end loaded. We've indicated this before when we signaled AML costs coming down. Now, clearly, we would expect you already see some of our FTE reductions in the course of this year. As we complete our remediation programs in 2023, we would expect to see a continued decrease of AML costs. We've signaled before also that regulatory levies are back-end loaded toward into 2024. At the same time, we continue to wind down our non-core operations. Now, clearly, that's not linear, and so we expect to have some of the EUR 100 million benefits that we also see still from that process coming in toward 2024. We continue to target 4.7 in a highly inflationary environment. Hopefully, that gives you a little bit of color on how we see the pathway into the targets that we've set for ourselves, Benjamin Goy. Good job. Thank you. The next question comes from Giulia Miotto of Morgan Stanley. Please go ahead. Yes. Hi. Good morning. Can I check something on the capital, like regulatory impact? Are you now done with the move from advanced to foundation, or is there more to come? If there is more to come, you know, can you perhaps quantify that? That's my first question. Secondly, in terms of NII, in terms of deposit beta, you mentioned, you know, that from here, competitive forces will drive essentially the deposit margin. What sort of deposit beta shall we expect in the Netherlands? I think in other markets, you know, that are further ahead with the hiking cycle, like the U.K. or even the U.S., deposit beta remains below 50%. Is that your expectation for the Netherlands as well? Something like, I don't know, 30%-40% would be realistic. Thank you. Thanks, Giulia. Tanja, if you could take the questions on capital, and Lars can comment on NII Tanja. Yes. On capital, yeah, as you've seen, Basel III and Basel IV RWAs have been converging now for some time. Actually, well, Basel III is now higher than Basel IV. Indeed, we have been redeveloping models, are still in the process of redeveloping models, and are moving models to foundation, where we make an estimate on what the impact will be. That process will continue, although the majority of that process is behind us. For the future, we do expect further development of models, further updates, and that can have both a positive as well as a negative impact on RWAs. Can I follow up there? Sorry, just a second. I was surprised actually that Basel III is now below Basel IV. I was wondering, does it make sense or ultimately would, like, Basel IV will come down? Like, yeah, it seems quite strange to me. Yeah. It has to do actually with the rules of Basel IV versus Basel III. There are some technical differences there that have an impact. For example, on large corporates, in the Basel IV, you're required to go to a foundational approach. That means that you take a standardized approach to loss given default and apply a floor there. The floor in the Basel III is actually higher than in the Basel IV. That explains the difference. For this portfolio, we're already going to foundation in the Basel III, and later on we will move to Basel IV, which will mean that RWAs will be lower than on the Basel III. There are technical explanations for that difference. Interesting. Okay, thank you. For capital distribution this year, you know, the threshold is 15%. Is that applied on Basel III or Basel IV? Sorry Sorry for That's Basel IV. On Basel IV. Yeah, no worries. That's Basel IV. Okay. Now we'll go to your beta question, Giulia. Sorry. Lars. Yeah, Giulia, hi. It's Lars. Look, on betas, ultimately, we do sort of place our own projections on, you know, our historical margins. Betas will play a part. I mean, you've seen a bit how the market has started repricing very quickly from negative up to zero. I mean, that was a very, very quick repricing. You know, there you have just a pretty high beta. In terms of what's happened subsequently, we've also seen a step through in terms of the bigger banks going up with the 25 basis points. We're going in there on the first of December. Ultimately, the beta will be determined by how we react in terms of competitively against each other and the ultimately the funding flows and how the customers, you know, reposition their deposits between the banks. Pretty much most of the customers here in the Netherlands are multi-banks. We would expect our deposit positions to actually stay quite stable. You actually see that already in Q3, deposit levels have actually been quite stable. Thank you. The next question comes in from Tarik El Mejjad of Bank of America. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning. Just a couple of questions, please. On the TLTRO, the one-off cost in Q4 will be booked in other income, rather than NII. Can you confirm that, please? The second question is more strategic on the CIB. I understand at the moment it's quite difficult to roll over, again, a growth strategy given the slowdown in the macro. You have to be careful a bit about asset quality and the writing. How do you see your growth in that area in the next few years evolving, especially is there risk that you. Given that you're already kind of subscale or small in some sectors, not all, would make you difficult to rebuild the franchise there? Just really to understand your strategy in that part of the business. Thank you very much. Yeah. Yeah, thanks for the question. Let me confirm the EUR 250 is in other income. In terms of the strategy for CIB, we have been very clear that the way we're rebuilding our corporate bank is through very focused approaches into sectors that where we've had traditional strengths and where we are well positioned in the Northwest European markets that we serve. That means that we clearly, as we navigate more difficult economic times, certainly we would expect to see some impact on volumes, particularly if economic conditions continue to worsen. At the same time, we're also positioned for transition sectors such as renewables, transition sectors in energy, and new energies that we're very close to. We've positioned ourselves in sectors around mobility, but also digital. Diversified but focused. Overall, generically, you're right. As economic conditions continue to potentially worsen, it could lead to a slack in volume growth. It's. I would say that's generic for the industry. It's not specific for us. We have made some very specific choices, focused choices in the markets in which we operate. Lars, anything you wanna say on the 250 other income? Well, I think on the TLTRO materially, yes, it will go into other income. There will be a small bit that goes into the NII as well. Okay, thank you very much. Thank you. The next question comes in of Anke Reingen of RBC. Please go ahead. Yeah, thank you very much for taking my question. The first one is on your 2024 ROE target or ROE target. Should this really be 10% now, given the rate environment? Secondly, thanks for the detail on the mortgage market and the provisioning. I just wonder what the sensitivity is to risk weightings. Would that be something that, yeah, depending on the house price move, what impact should we see on risk weightings? Thank you very much. Thank you. I'll ask Tanja Cuppen to comment on the risk weighting in the mortgage market. Your question on the ROEs with the implied forward rates, that 10% is still attainable. Keep in mind that we're looking for a 2024 outcome in changing economic conditions. That we do need to keep in the back of our minds. With the forward implied rates, that 10% is attainable. Okay. On the mortgage market, as you are aware, there's a DNB floor for RWA for mortgages. That is based on loan to values. We are quite far away from the fact that this mortgage floor will not be the constraining factor in calculating RWA for mortgages. Okay. Thank you. I don't expect there a significant impact. Okay, thank you very much for both answers. Thanks. Thank you. The next question comes from Amit Goel of Barclays. Please go ahead. Hi. Thank you. Two questions. One, hopefully I understood it correctly. In terms of the EUR 250 million buyback, it seems unlikely that any of that will get completed in the remainder of this year. I'm just curious, can you announce a new program before that has actually been kind of fully executed? The second question is just coming back again on NII. I'm just kind of curious, again, in terms of the moving parts, why effectively the Q4 implied is not higher still, and what are the moving parts or the main moving parts that you see for next year versus this year? Thank you. Thank you. Thanks for the question. Lars, if you can take the implied in Q4, and I'll take that first question. The short answer is yes, we can do that. We can still conclude off on separate programs. Lars, maybe. Yeah, I would say in terms of the NII in the fourth quarter, one of the big drag factors that has to still work its way through, finally, is obviously on the negative rate reset, where we are stepping through on the first of October. That has to still work its way through for the full quarter. For next year, you know, clearly with the rates where they are, the duration of the mortgage book also continues to go out, and we have to, you know, ultimately in terms of our interest rate management, we are managing that duration as well. If the rates keep going up, that is also an expense that we have to factor in as a potential future drag. Okay, thank you. Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Andrea Scauri of Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead. Hi. Thank you very much for taking my questions. Can I come back to NII, please? At what point and to what extent would you expect deposit migration from current accounts into savings or term deposits? Secondly, how do you think about current accounts? Would you consider paying an interest rate on those, or do you consider them operational balances? Are you not planning on paying anything there? Could you comment on the factors you consider when setting savings rates, in general? Perhaps you can specifically talk about the role of the replication yield in this context. You've talked about the margin cap, for instance, before. Thank you. Lars? Yeah. On the current accounts, we do see those as operational, so we would not be charging or paying interest rates on those. Really, the setting of the rates on the accounts primarily comes back to can we preserve or at least get to the historical margins that we are, you know, that we use as a reference point. Ultimately, though, there is always the main, you know, external driver is what do the other banks do. Do we see something underlying in terms of customer behavior? It's a clear reflection is how quickly the banks have moved in the last quarter on this. Yeah. Let me just reiterate that increasingly that is becoming the normal environment in which we see market dynamics we've seen before, which is really driven by competitive behavior by banks, as well as any funding costs. Yeah. I think in terms of your question on switching, you know, for us, this is also very much a funding management exercise. If we do in terms of also trying to steer, you know, the balance sheets as to the sort of length of funding that we need, sometimes we would set the term deposits and start increasing the rates. But at the moment, we're so liquid that that is not really something that's necessary. Obviously, as liquidity and funding tighten, then that becomes more of a factor in terms of attracting longer term, you know, longer term savings. Perfect. Thank you very much. Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Farquhar Murray of Autonomous. Please go ahead. Morning, all. Just two questions, if I may. Actually, unfortunately, they're both coming back to NII. Firstly, in terms of your guidance, obviously it implies about EUR 1.4-1.5 billion for the fourth quarter. If we adjust that for kind of the negative deposit rates, about, say, EUR 80 million and TLTRO of about EUR 40 million, are there any other adjustments to make in order to kind of hit the run rate going into next year? Then just more generally, I'm a little bit surprised by your positive commentary around volumes in mortgages and corporate loans. Can you just outline what's behind that, given the macro backdrop and also obviously much, much higher mortgage interest rates in the backdrop, which has obviously kind of reduced volumes elsewhere? Do you think that momentum can continue into next year? Thanks. Yeah. I'll take the volumes question. Lars, you wanna. I mean, on the NII, yeah, I think those are the two major moving parts that you can factor in. Perfect. Yeah. Just back to your question on volumes, I think I clearly indicated that negative economic circumstances are bound to have impact on volumes. So both in the mortgage book, we would expect volumes to begin to come down over the next few quarters. I mean, that's clearly an expectation driven by the rising interest rates. If economic conditions continue to worsen, I would expect to see volume effects, certainly given the outlooks. Just more generally, have you not seen those to some degree already? I mean, obviously the headline mortgage rate has obviously moved, and presumably customers can see that and must be responding already. Well, we're starting to see a slowdown, certainly of volumes. When you look at our Q3 performance, there's still a level of high performance on the back of, at the time, rising interest rates, which drove up volume quite a bit. Certainly, in the last quarter, we should expect to see volumes beginning to come down. Do you think the loan book would come down, particularly on the mortgage side next year then, even if just modestly? You're talking about a net deleveraging or just a? Yeah. New production? Just mortgage stock balance. No, I would expect it. Also, if you look at our expectations on the macro here in the Netherlands, it's definitely not as depressed as the rest of Europe either. From a GDP perspective, we do expect some recessionary pressure here, but in terms of stock levels, I don't expect that to be happening. I mean, what is interesting is that with the interest rates rising, it's really slowed down, you know, the refinancing pressure, and therefore that level of demand has come off, and it's pretty much gone now. It has had an effect on house prices, and lower house prices actually does have some beneficial impact on demand as well, so that you were asking a bit as to what's maybe underlying some of the continued build-up is actually prices coming down. I mean, you know the market over here is structurally undersupplied. That's another area. Then the other thing with the increase in rates that is actually helpful is because people are not refinancing as much or hardly at all, that refinancing in the past used to actually mean quite a lot of people took their mortgages away and went to another bank. Effectively, the back door is also closed in terms of outflows. You know, the outflow side of the mortgage book is also reduced. All of that I think is reasonably defensive on the overall level of the stock of mortgages. Okay. Thanks, Farquhar Murray. That's really helpful. Thank you. The next question comes from the line of Kiri Vijayarajah of HSBC. Please go ahead. Yes, good morning, everyone. Just a couple of quick questions left. Firstly, on the other income line, you've had a steady stream of gains, you know, real estate disposals through the course of this year. Presumably that falls back towards more normal levels in 2023. What should we be thinking about as kind of a more normalized quarterly run rate there? I know going back a couple of years, you did have some quite old guidance of EUR 50 million a quarter. Would that be kind of quite a good benchmark to use for next year on the other income line? And then on the short term NII drivers, I think last quarter you mentioned mortgage steering costs as a drag. Is that something that suddenly got a lot easier for you guys to manage, or is it more a case that those mortgage steering costs you're now able to pass on to the end customer? Just sort of making sure that that's kind of now dropped out of the equation as a drag on your NII and what's happening in terms of, you know, Dutch mortgage pricing, on that front. Thank you. Thank you. I think it's fair to say on other income, we're not providing any additional guidance, other than the volatility that you see in other income. Lars, over to you. Yeah. On the NII and the steering costs. As I mentioned earlier, I mean, the steering costs are always there, but definitely in terms of where if you were to look at the steering costs, you know, three months ago, six months ago, those have come down, and we have repositioned. Now, are they going to disappear completely? No, they're always going to be a factor, and it really is linked a bit to the volatility of the interest rates. So as the, you know, as the volatility reduces, the steering costs will also come off. Okay. Thank you. Thanks. As a reminder, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one. The next question comes from the line of Benoît Pétrarque of Kepler Cheuvreux. Please go ahead. Yes, sorry. I've got two follow-up questions. I think the first one is on the question from Giulia on the Basel IV, Basel III. So just to understand it correctly, if you talk to your regulator, the DNB, let's say, and ECB, are they focusing? When you talk with them about capital distribution, are they focusing on the Basel III or the Basel IV figure? I will be surprised if they will be focusing on the Basel IV because then you will end up ultimately, potentially, you know, paying back some of the future regulatory tailwinds to shareholders upfront. I was kind of curious where they stand. Just to come back to the story on this beta discussion, the fact that Rabo moved to 25 basis points and you followed quite fast afterwards. Is this first move not a response to a kind of expectation from the Dutch society that rates moved up, therefore banks should remunerate positively deposits? Or do you, I mean, you seems to read something more aggressive from your competitors, i.e. that yeah the pass-through is quite high and will remain quite high, i.e. the upside for shareholders on NII is going to be quite limited. I wanted to understand better. It seems that you are more on the defensive side in terms of pass-through. While I had more of a read of kind of yeah the Dutch press have been talking about higher rates. Everybody is talking about higher savings rates. The large banks have been passing on the first 25 basis points, but we should not expect a very aggressive stance from, at the end of the day, quite consolidated banking landscape in the Netherlands. Thank you. Tanja, do you wanna comment on the? Yes, I think the question on Basel III, Basel IV was on talking about distributions. Of course, we are talking about with our regulator both on Basel III as well as on Basel IV. On distributions to the market, we have provided our guidance with the 50%, so that has not changed. On pricing. In terms of the pricing, ultimately, you know, we were very keen to get back to normal interest rates, in the view of customers and getting back out of the negative rate space as quickly as possible. The next step up, I would honestly say is a bit of a combination of where the rates have gone, headline rates, generally also rates on assets, and then, you know, seeing a bit that we do not get caught by a competitor moving, especially with that first step from zero into positive territory. We'll have to see a bit after this. I mean, it's not as if that was stimulated by any sort of funding issues or deposit rebalancing. Clearly not. We also just wanted to protect against that. Okay. Very clear. Thank you very much. We currently have no further questions. If you would like to ask a question, please press star one.