Good day, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to TomTom's Q2 2021 Earnings Conference Call. At this time all participants are in a listen only mode. We will be facilitating a question and answer session towards the end of today's prepared remarks. At that time if you like to ask a question you may pressing star one on your telephone. If at any time during the call you need audio assistance feel free to press star zero and the conference coordinator will be happy to help you. Please note that this conference is being recorded. I will now turn the call over to your host for today's conference, Claudia Janssen, Head of Investor Relations and Group Controller. You may begin. Thank you, operator. Good afternoon. Welcome to our conference call, during which we will discuss our operational and financial highlights for the Q2 of 2021. With me today are Harold Goddijn, our CEO, and Taco Titulaer, our CFO. We will start today's call with Harold, who will discuss the key operational developments, followed by a more detailed look at the financial results and outlook from Taco, who will take your questions. As usual, I would like to point out that Safe Harbor applies. With that, Harold, I would like to hand over to you. Yeah. Thank you very much, Claudia Janssen. Welcome, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for joining us. I will briefly go over our key operational highlights for the quarter, and then Taco will provide further information on the financials and the outlook for the year. Looking back on the H1 of 2021, our enterprise unit showed a robust performance. We expanded our customer base in fleet logistics and on-demand markets where we have a strong market presence already. Next to that, we further extended our footprint in the insurance market. Our products for traffic, speed profiles, congestion data, are used to produce hyperlocal and reliable risk profiles for drivers, which help to accurately price insurance products. In automotive, we see leading brands continue to incorporate our technology, including our mapping data for advanced driver assistance features. The all-new Nissan QASHQAI launched recently featuring TomTom maps, which are delivered over the air. Our ADAS content also supports the new upgraded driver assistance features. Genesis is Hyundai Kia's luxury brand, and they have chosen TomTom maps and real-time traffic services for their upcoming models in Europe. We do have a long-standing relationship with Hyundai Kia for the supply of traffic and incident data, but this is the first time Hyundai Kia is using our maps. We expect to be able to broaden and deepen this relationship in the future, which would mark another important market share win. Toyota launched their Teammate product last month, which will be the first commercially available level 2 system incorporating TomTom HD maps. The Teammate system fuses lidar and camera sensor information with our HD map to localize the vehicle. The system facilitates automated lane change and intelligent speed control, particularly important for speed adjustments at exit ramps. Toyota has published a YouTube movie that explains the working of the system and the role of our map. So far this year, deal activity for both Enterprise and Automotive has been good. We expect further significant wins for the H2 of the year. This concludes my part of the presentation. I'm now handing over to Taco. Thank you, Harold. I will make some comments on the financials and outlook, then we'll go to the Q&A. Group revenue increased year-on-year by 8% as we reported revenue of EUR 133 million. Location Technology grew 10% to EUR 103 million for the Q2. Let me go through revenue business by business. Automotive revenue was EUR 61 million, an increase of 18% compared with the same quarter last year. Automotive operational revenue, which is average revenue adjusted for the movement in deferred revenue, was EUR 63 million, an increase of 63%. The strong year-on-year growth came despite supply chain constraints in the automotive industry as factory closure impacted the comparative quarter following COVID-19 lockdown restrictions. Enterprise reported revenue of EUR 42 million and consumer-reported revenue of EUR 30 million. Revenue from both units was flat year-on-year. As most of our Enterprise revenue is based on U.S. dollars, the year-over-year trend was negatively impacted by the effect of the U.S. dollar. On an equal currency, Enterprise was 7% up in the quarter. Gross margin for Q1 was 77% compared with 86% in the same quarter last year. During the quarter, one of our automotive customers started production of several car lines that utilize our software. This triggered the release of customer-specific costs from our balance sheet, temporarily lowering our gross margin. If we adjust for the release of contract costs, the gross margin would have been 84%. For the remainder of the year, we expect gross margin to be north of 80%. Operating expenses were EUR 124 million, a decrease of EUR 46 million compared with the same quarter last year. This decrease is because of lower amortization as the Tele Atlas database acquired in 2008 were fully amortized last year. Excluding the impact of depreciation and amortization, underlying operating expenses showed a year-on-year increase of around 7%. This mainly reflects increases in research and development costs associated with our application layer. The free cash flow for the quarter was an outflow of EUR 60 million compared with an outflow of EUR 54 million in the same quarter last year. The year-on-year improvement is mainly because of higher automotive operational revenue. We reported a net cash position of EUR 319 million at the end of the quarter, a decrease of EUR 33 million since the end of the first quarter. The decrease is a result of share purchases made under the share buyback program and a negative free cash flow in the quarter. Now moving to the next slide. In the H1 of the year, we've seen that the widespread shortage in semiconductors have impacted the automotive supply chain, which impacts car production. As automotive revenue is invoiced based on the number of cars produced that embed our software, this is expected to lead to lower automotive operational revenue and free cash flow. Taking this into account, we have updated our guidance for the year. We now expect group revenue of around EUR 500 million-EUR 530 million, and Location Technology revenue between EUR 400 million and EUR 430 million. Our full-year free cash flow is expected to be around 5% of group revenue. In the H1 of the year, we have had a cash outflow. We want to reiterate that our cash inflow is weighted to the H2 of the year, particularly in the last quarter of the year, due to the timing of certain customer payments. Operator, we would now like to start the Q&A session. Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. If you have question please press star then one on your touch tone phone. If you want to leave the queue press the hash key. If you are using a speaker phone you may need to pick up the hand set before pressing the numbers. Once again if you have a question press star then one on your touch tone phone. Your first question is from the line of François-Xavier Bouvignies from UBS. Please go ahead. Hi, everyone. I have a couple of questions. Maybe if we look at TomTom from a high-level perspective, you had the pandemic impacting you last year, and now you have the shortage that basically the recovery is not happening maybe as much as you expected. You had your backlog that you had to revise down because of some long-term contracts that have been revised because of the pandemic. Maybe Harold or Taco, any of you, what can you give to the market to think that the worst is behind, basically? I mean any data points you can share that makes you confident that from here we will see an acceleration, and particularly, your Location Technology revenues to go back to this 10% growth, double-digit growth, and free cash flow margin of double digits as a percentage. Can you share with us what makes you confident that the worst is behind and we should see recovery from here? Would be very helpful to reassure the investor community. I have others after. Yeah, maybe I can take that, François. As Harold already said in his narrative, is that we are very confident with the level of deal activity that we've seen in the H1 of the year, and we are especially optimistic about the H2 of the year. For us, this deal activity is a leading indicator for how the future will look like. Although the pandemic and also the chip shortages have hit us hard and even harder than we hoped or expected, with that deal activity, we share the confidence with the sector that this is a temporary phenomenon and that we will recover from this. Okay. Thank you. On the deals that you see in the market, is it because of the market that is recovering, or is it because you are winning market share or because you add some content? Can you give a bit more flavor of how you see the deal activity playing on with TomTom and the market separately? Yeah, I think it's a combination of all of the above. I think we have a very strong application layer now, especially for the automotive industry, that's well received. I think we, by now, are the largest vendor of software in the automotive industry. We see good potential in the EV market. We're particularly strong there also with our routing algorithms and our EV products. We expect high attachment rates there. That's also, I think, a positive. I think we're generally doing well in the marketplace, and it's a bit of a disappointment and slightly frustrating that it hasn't materialized in Q1 and Q2 as we had hoped. I'm quietly confident that there will be a level of pent-up demand. Car makers are struggling to meet demands. Prices are good. Second car prices are at an all-time high. All that are indicators that the volume we have missed in Q1 and Q2, we may recover in the future, at least to an extent. That's very clear. You have been investing in application layer for a bit more, and especially like you said, the OpEx is up 7% year-over-year, mainly driven by the application layer. Can you explain a bit more what the fruit of this work, what's the results? Do you see, I guess it takes a bit of time, but do you see any impact on your deal activity or interest from the customers? Anything you can give around the return on your investment on the application layer, basically? Yeah. I think we said it for a couple of quarters now that the market is moving to an online presence with an embedded fallback position. We have been investing in that technology, and we see that car makers are buying that from us. You don't see it in the figures now, but we will start shipping. We have won contracts for those new application layer we call the Turning NavKit2. It's gone down well with the car makers. Especially in the H2, I expect to be able to sign more customers for that application layer with or without content. At least in either case, the application layer is doing really well, and it translates in a better user experience. Over-the-air updates, up-to-date maps. Our traffic is really good. Our incident data is leading in the industry. At an end-user level, those are the things that really matter. We are increasingly capable of meeting those end-user requirements and I think the car makers recognize that. How should we think about the OpEx going forward with the application layer? Is it something that's going to continue growing, or it's going to stay there for a bit of time? Flattening, how should we think about the OpEx spend or run rate that you are running at at the moment? Well, it's difficult to predict. I think it won't grow enormously at the application layer, but there's much more going on as well. There is a big change going on in map making. We see the availability of all sorts of digital data, all sorts of super sources coming through that will enable us also to completely rethink and redesign the whole map making process. We have a very strong foundation with our CPP map making system, but the input to that system is going to be more and more automated as a result of much more data that are becoming available. We are also on the content side, we are investing to make map making better, more efficient. We are hoping to, as a result of that, to have much more coverage in more countries, many more attributes. That is not just important for the automotive industry, but particularly important for the enterprise market. As a result of a better database, also in the enterprise market, we'll be able to expand the type of customers and the type of use cases we go after. We will be able to do that in more countries than ever before. There's a lot of change. We're firing on all cylinders to deliver that change. I don't think that over the short term, the expenses in R&D will go down. On the longer and midterm, there are clear opportunities for massive improvements in efficiency. How long is it going to take? This investment and this change. Well, it's never done, but we start already to see the effects of that approach. We are producing more data than ever. We do that mostly in automated processes. That is an ongoing transition. It will never be finished. There will be more data become available. There will be higher requirements on the database. Based on those new technologies and that new platform, we are confident that we can create much better maps in a much more efficient way than ever before. Okay, that's clear. Last one from me, HD maps. You mentioned Toyota HD maps. Can you tell a bit more about HD maps? How is it changing versus what? Is it more activity there? Anything you can give on that? Yeah, there's a lot of activity. I would like to include the whole ADAS development that is growing faster than HD. The two are linked. They form, in a way, a continuum, and especially on the ADAS side, we see a lot of activity taking place there. There's a new European directive called ISA, which requires for proper traffic speed indication in the vehicle. There's a bit of a scramble going on to get that data into the vehicle. We see a lot of activity on that side as well. You see a steady increase in ADAS functionality, steady increase in the level of automation of vehicles. The reliability of those systems is going up. I think the full automated car is still elusive. We still don't know exactly when that will happen, but the degree of automation that's taking place in vehicles is definitely increasing and improving rapidly. A lot of those functions are based on databases and map content. Okay. Thank you very much, Harold. I will leave the floor. Thank you. Your next question is from the line of Andrew Gardiner from Barclays. Please go ahead. Good afternoon. Thanks for taking the question. Two, please. First, perhaps for Taco, on the updated guidance you've given us for Location Technology. I was just hoping to dive a bit deeper in terms of some of the drivers there. I can completely understand what you're saying about the semiconductor shortages and therefore the limitations on car volumes over the course of recent quarters and coming quarters. If I look at what you guys have actually guided to, at the midpoint, it's about 6% revenue growth for Location Technology. Enterprise looks like it's doing well, flat to maybe up a little bit this year, depending on the H2, which then leaves the automotive business similar. Up maybe mid-to-high single digits. Of course from an operational standpoint, I know you've got the movement in deferred revenue, which we don't have perfect visibility into. Even so, if we say operational revenue for this year, you're effectively guiding to mid to high single-digit growth. It feels like that's underperforming the end market. I look at IHS calling for 11% growth, unit volume growth this year, I'm a little surprised that you guys would be below that, given your content gain for your type of a product. Can you help me understand why that might be? Well, first of all, you're right in the breakdown. We see similar trends. A modest increase in enterprise revenue of low single-digit percentage and a high single-digit percentage growth for automotive. Operationally, we expect automotive to grow with a double-digit number. Very similar to what you say, what this IHS is indicating. Yeah, a compounding effect of the semiconductor shortage is that for certain car lines, prioritization by the OEMs has led to less silicon in the car, affecting the take rate of our product. We're confident that it's a temporary phenomenon, but with some of the OEMs, they say, "Well, there's so large shortages of semiconductors, let's try to push cars out that either have a high margin or that we can actually produce." For the latter, that has a compound effect on our sales. Anyway, we believe that will be behind us, give another two quarters or so. That's affecting us. Again, we agree with your breakdown of enterprise and automotive on an IFRS basis. Operationally, the strength of automotive will be double digits. Okay, perhaps a bit more coming through the deferred revenue movement in the H2 to boost that to more market levels of growth? Yes. Okay. Just one looking out a little bit further. I mean, Harold, you talked about deal activity being strong and the potential or even likelihood of pent-up demand from this year being realized in future periods. Earlier this year, you guys gave us 2023 guidance for Location Technology revenue of EUR 550 million. Do you think that's still achievable? Is this a sort of temporary setback this year that you can make up next year and the year beyond? I think that is still achievable. I don't see anything fundamental that is pushing us off course. No, at this point, I don't see any reason why that would not be achievable. Thank you. Thank you. Once again, it is star and one if you'd like to ask a question. Your next question is from the line of Marc Hesselink from ING. Please go ahead. Hi. Thank you. Firstly, on the significant wins that you expect in the H2 of 2021, how come you have that visibility? These deals, are those very close, or are you such in the process that it's indeed very likely that you will win them? What kind of deals are they? Are they new clients that you win from the competition? If you can split it up between automotive and enterprise, that would be very useful. Thanks. Yeah. The deals structure and the sales process for award contracts, in particular, is long. We have good visibility on which contracts will be awarded when. That's always subject to change, and it can be pushed out, can be brought forward. By and large, we have a timetable, and intimate involvement with our customers of when those deals will be awarded and what we need to do to win them. That results in a pipeline, that results in a total market that we can see, and then we apply our expectations and weigh those opportunities, and that results us in believing that there's a good opportunity for strong order intake in this year. H1 was already good. I think in the H2 of this year, there are major opportunities available to us. Now, the problem, of course, is they need to materialize. It's a zero or a one at the end of the day. It's very difficult to give you a number. That's also not what we do. We do that in beginning of next year, we give you an overview of the order backlog and how that has changed in 2021. If I would be a gambling man, then I say it's going to be a good year for order intake in 2021. Okay. Is it extension of contract that you already have? Is it new contract that you win from the competition? You said both in automotive and enterprise, right? Well, I was particularly referring to the automotive because that's where you have a more structured deal process, so you have a good visibility of the pipeline. Whereas in enterprise, it's more short-term and more event-driven, I would say. I think in enterprise, there are good opportunities as well for us to further improve our customer base. When I talk about the automotive opportunities, I would say it's probably 50/50. Half of the opportunities are existing customers with extensions and new awards, and the other 50% would be clear market share wins. Okay. The extensions, what's the dynamic there? Is that more for the same price? You're offering your new products with more functionality, but pricing remains relatively stable? Yeah. Typically, it's related to a new generation of hardware, and a new generation of vehicles that are planned for. You typically win or lose, but we hope to win the software and the content for the next generation of vehicle models for a particular brand. That's kind of how it works. In between, there's the other bits and pieces and things are moving and extensions and whatnot. The big deals tend to be linked to a new generation of vehicles with a new generation of in-vehicle technology. Okay. Clear. Thanks. I think what we also see is, I think there is a trend visible. I think a couple of years back, OEMs would really go from deal to deal and generation to generation, and everything would be reset to zero. The vendor with the best product price combination would typically win. What we see is more longevity, and more strategic alignment, and the willingness of car makers to start from scratch is reducing. I think that's a good thing for us because we have, I think with our customers, a good reputation of doing what we promise to do, being on time, on quality, be collaborative. Typically, the working relationships our engineers and product people have with their counterparts in the OEM industry could be characterized by good and of a high level of trust. That helps us, of course, in extending and deepening those partnerships further. Because software is getting more complex and there's more moving parts, there is a clear economic rationale also to keep building and deepen those relationships further and make them more strategic in their nature. Does that make sense? Yes. Clear. Maybe I think on the enterprise side, just to be 100% sure that the underlying business is actually growing a bit more, right? I mean, the U.S, dollar is still pushing it down a bit, so it's more like mid-single digit like for like? For Q2, you mean? Yeah. Maybe in general, the trend that- Yeah. No, well, at the settlement, yeah, for IFRS, we think it is a modest increase for full year. Q2 specific, the increase was like for like currency, 8%. Okay. Clear. Thanks. Thank you. Since there are no further questions, I would like to thank you all for joining us this afternoon. Operator, you can close the call. Thank you. That concludes the presentation today. Thank you for participating. You may now disconnect.