Hello, and welcome to the Royal Vopak first half 2024 update. Throughout the call, all participants will be in listening mode, and after that, there will be a Q&A session. This call is being recorded. I am pleased to present Fatjona Topciu, Head of Investor Relations. Please go ahead with your meeting. Good morning, everyone, and welcome to our Half Year 2024 Result Analyst Call. My name is Fatjona Topciu, Head of IR. Today, our CEO, Dick Richelle, and CFO, Michiel Gilsing, will guide you through our latest results. We will refer to first half's 2024 analyst presentation, which you can follow on screen and download from our website. After the presentation, we will have the opportunity for a Q&A. A replay of the webinar will be made available on our website as well. Before we start, I would like to refer to the disclaimer content of the forward-looking statements, which you are familiar with. I would like to remind you that we may make forward-looking statements during the presentation, which involve certain risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, this is applicable to the entire call, including the answers provided during the Q&A part. With that, I would like to hand over the call to Dick. Thank you very much, Fatjona, and a very good morning to all of you. Thank you for joining us in this call. Let's move straight into the key highlights of the first half of this year. The demand for our services remained strong across the portfolio, and that resulted in a proportional occupancy of 92%. We continued to serve our customers well. At the same time, we reported improved financial results, growing our proportional EBITDA to EUR 599 million, a 10% increase when you adjust that for the divestment impact. Also, our operating cash return improved from 14.6% last year to 16.7% at the end of this quarter, driven by a lower average capital employed due to the divestment and a positive contribution from growth projects. Our strong business performance led us to update our full year 2024 outlook for proportional EBITDA, reported EBITDA and growth CapEx, which Michiel will further explain later. Let's take a look at growth. Since this quarter, we took FID to construct a large-scale LPG export facility in Prince Rupert, Western Canada, together with our partner, AltaGas. This major investment will play a crucial role in LPG export from Canada to the growth markets in Asia. At the same time, we started market consultation in the Netherlands to explore a future LNG and new energies. to explore a future for LNG and new energies such as CO2 or hydrogen in Eems Energy Terminal in the Netherlands. In addition to gas, also in industrial terminals, we executed on our growth strategy. Today, we announced two expansions in industrial complexes in Saudi Arabia and in China, of which I will provide some more details later. And then over to accelerate. During the first half of the year, we've taken next steps in the development for CO2 next terminal in Rotterdam. Together with our partners, the engineering phase has started, and we are working towards a final investment decision in 2025. Also, in this quarter, in Alamoa, Brazil, 15,000 cubic meters of capacity was commissioned for renewable feedstock. We're well positioned to be the market leader in the Brazilian renewable fuels and feedstock market, which is a key market for low carbon fuels and feedstocks such as ethanol and biodiesel. These developments in repurposing infrastructure for low carbon fuels and feedstocks fits very well in our accelerate strategy. If we take a step back and look at the progress we made over the last two years, we actively managed our portfolio during this period and improved the financial performance. These actions led to a divestment proceeds of more than EUR 500 million received and an operating cash return well above 12%. On the other hand, we invested almost EUR 900 million in growth projects, mainly in industrial and gas terminals over the last two years, which leads to more stable and long-term earnings in our portfolio. We made important steps in developing infrastructure for new energies by repurposing capacity for low carbon fuels and feedstocks, and a strong commitment in the development of CO2 infrastructure, hydrogen and its derivatives, and electrical storage and electricity storage. Move on to some of the dynamics of the key markets in which we operate and how they impact the demand for our infrastructure services. To start with the gas markets, we saw continued high utilization of our LNG infrastructure. Also, LPG demand is growing around the world, driven by petrochemical and residential demand in India, for example. These terminals have a stable financial performance, given the long-term and take-or-pay nature of our contracts. The market for low carbon fuels like SAF and renewable diesel is in a bit of oversupply, while the demand for these fuels and feedstock in the longer term continues to be robust. There's momentum for CO2 infrastructure, and we see policy frameworks for low carbon hydrogen evolving as well. This translates into an attractive pipeline of opportunities of CO2 and low carbon hydrogen and its derivatives. Let's move over to the energy markets, 'cause the fundamentals in the energy markets remain healthy. Our oil hub terminals in Singapore, Fujairah, and Rotterdam continue to have a strong demand. At the same time, the need for local imports are driving stable performance in our oil distribution terminals. Lastly, the chemical markets, they continue to be oversupplied. However, the impact on our chemical distribution terminals remain limited. Industrial terminals connected to manufacturing clusters show solid throughput levels. When looking at the financial performance, let me take you through the different elements of our business performance in more detail. First, note the divestment impact of EUR 43 million. The divestment impact was offset by the contribution of growth projects in mainly the Netherlands, the U.S., and Canada. The oil markets remained favorable. High occupancy rates and contract renewals drove growth in EBITDA from oil, from the oil portfolio across the globe. Chemical markets continue to be characterized by oversupply of the end products, while the impact on demand for storage infrastructure is limited. Throughput levels in our industrial terminals remain solid, and our terminal storing LNG and LPG saw increasing revenues, mainly in SPEC, in Colombia, and other terminals in India. A one-off item related to the FID taken for REEF positively impacted the proportional EBITDA by EUR 7 million. All in all, this resulted in a proportional EBITDA of EUR 599 million, and when you adjust that for the divestment impact, this is a 10% increase compared to the first half of 2023. Now, let's take a look at our sustainability performance. To start with safety, our personal safety performance was slightly below the one in the same period last year. On the other hand, we made good improvements on process safety. With regards to emissions, a 15% decrease in Scope 1 and 2 emissions was recorded year-on-year, mainly by purchasing green electricity and further electrifying our operations. We do that, for example, in Vlaardingen, in the Netherlands, where we are investing around EUR 5 million to install an e-boiler, which will reduce the emissions of that terminal by 30%. Percentage of women in senior management remain unchanged. We continue to focus on diversity with our target of 25% of women in senior management by 2025. Let's move over to the strategic pillar, the next strategic pillar of our strategy, growing our base in industrial and gas terminals. As said, we committed almost EUR 900 million since June 2022 to gas and industrial terminals, and we remain committed to capture growth opportunities in this segment as we continue to see attractive projects beyond the EUR 1 billion ambition. Gas terminals provide security of supply for energy and feedstocks, and they play an important role in the energy transition. With the industrial terminals, we support our customers in key industrial clusters with long-term partnerships. Over the last 12 months, we invested in multiple gas terminals. We acquired 50% share in Eems Energy Terminal, and we started the construction of a fourth tank at the Gate Terminal, both in the Netherlands. At the same time, as I said, we took positive FID to build the REEF Terminal in Prince Rupert, Western Canada. In a strong partnership with AltaGas, we're building 95,000 cubic meters of LPG storage capacity in a strategic location to serve the growing Asian demand markets. And Vopak is committed to invest EUR 462 million to realize this. Today, we announced 2 expansion projects in industrial terminals. We will expand our Chemtank terminal in Saudi Arabia to further support our industrial customer there. And in China, in Qinzhou, we are investing in a brownfield expansion project by adding 96,000 cubic meters of pipeline-connected storage capacity. These projects fit very well in our growth strategy, underpinned by long-term contracts, and it will deliver attractive returns upon completion. Now, let's move to India, our joint venture with Aegis. It has a strong terminal footprint. As this map shows, we have terminals around the country where we store mainly liquid chemical products and LPG, supporting the economic growth and making alternative, lower carbon fuels available throughout the country. In multiple locations, we're expanding with additional capacity for chemicals and mainly LPG. As announced before, Aegis Vopak Terminals, a Vopak joint venture with Aegis Logistics, is exploring options to fund future growth. Over the last years, we've taken important actions to transition the portfolio towards assets that generate higher quality earnings. We reinvested the divestment proceeds of more than EUR 500 million into mainly gas and industrial terminals. Therefore, the exposure to commodity markets, mainly in oil and chemicals, was reduced over the years, with the decreased share of these terminals in our portfolio capital allocation from around 90% ten years ago to around 50% today. The majority of EUR 900 million invested, committed over the last years, are allocated towards projects in industrial and gas terminals, and they're all backed by long-term contracts. So ultimately, that's leading to an improved trend in the operating cash return. With regards to our third strategic pillar, accelerate towards new energies and sustainable fuels and feed stock, we see good momentum around the world. We see opportunities in new energies, and our presence in strategic locations helps us to capture these as well. In Rotterdam, we're taking next steps in the development of CO2 infrastructure. This open access CO2 terminal, called CO2n ext, may play a crucial role in further decarbonizing the industrial cluster of Rotterdam and beyond. After repurposing capacity in the U.S., the Netherlands and Singapore earlier, we commissioned this quarter repurposed capacity in Alamoa, Brazil, for renewable feedstocks. All these developments fit well in our strategy to accelerate the investments for infrastructure in new energies and sustainable feedstocks. To summarize, we continue to deliver another strong quarter, and we are executing on our strategy to grow in industrial and gas terminals. We've rationalized our portfolio over time, and that has led to an improved cash flow profile of higher quality. We've invested almost EUR 900 million in industrial and gas terminals since setting our strategic priorities. We continue to drive progress by focus on repurposing our current infrastructure for low carbon fuels and feedstocks, and made the first investments in new energy projects. With that, I want to hand it over to our CFO, Michiel, who will give you more insights on the financial aspects of the half of this year, the first half of this year. Thank you, Dick, and also from my side, a good morning to everyone in the call. First of all, let me take you through our financial results of the first half year in a bit more detail. I will first give some more insight in our financial performance in the first half year and Q2, then discuss our strong and long-term cash flow generating capabilities, as well as our long-term fundamentals, including the updated full year 2024 outlook. To start off with the financial performance for the first half of this year compared to the same period last year. The proportional EBITDA grew, adjusted for divestments with EUR 43 million, a 10% increase compared to last year. The increase was driven by contributions from growth projects and a certain one-off item of total EUR 7 million related to an unconditional success fee in Canada. On a consolidated basis, EBITDA increased by 8% when adjusted for divestments, driven by a favorable market demand and one-off items of EUR 17 million. Next to the success fee, a deferred income tax release in our joint venture in Pakistan of EUR 10 million contributed positively to the consolidated EBITDA. As you can see, the proportional occupancy increased by 1 percentage point compared to the first half of last year. An occupancy of 92% reflects a solid demand for our business. Looking at the proportional operating cash return, we achieved an OCR of 16.7%, a 2.1 percentage point increase compared to last year's first half. This was driven by a lower average capital employed due to the divestments we made and contribution of growth projects on the other hand. If we then zoom in on the second quarter compared to the first quarter of this year, we see a slightly decreasing proportional occupancy rate of 92%, a one percentage point decrease compared to Q1 of this year. This decrease is related to lower occupancy levels in China and some out of service capacity in the Netherlands. Revenues were EUR 326 million and remained stable compared to last quarter. With regards to the operating expenses, we see an increase compared to the previous quarter, driven by higher personnel and insurance costs. Proportional EBITDA of EUR 302 million this quarter was slightly higher, mainly related to the one-off positive item of EUR 7 million as a result of the positive FID, Final Investment Decision, in Canada. If we take a closer look at the performance of the business units, then it shows a continuing trend of improvement across the regions. The negative divestment impact of EUR 43 million was fully offset by contributions from growth projects in the first half of this year. A stable performance in the Asia business unit was driven by the good performance in our oil and gas terminals. The Netherlands saw improved performance, especially in Rotterdam, and as mentioned, a EUR 7 million success fee due to the final investment decision taken for REEF in west of Canada contributed to the result. The proportional EBITDA margin improved to 59%, up from 57% in the first half of last year. All in all, we experienced a robust demand for our services, driven by an increased demand for energy and a continued rebalancing of trade flows around the world. In this slide, we are giving some more detail on the proportional EBITDA performance of the different terminal types, which we operate. Gas terminals showed firm throughput levels, and the growth in proportional EBITDA is driven mainly by our newly added Eems Energy Terminal in the Netherlands. Industrial terminals, which are characterized by long-term contracts, often 20 years or longer, had solid throughput levels. Chemicals performance increased when adjusted for the divestments we did last year. Vegetable oils and biofuels, not being a segment on their own, are mainly in this segment as well. Also, for oil terminals, proportional EBITDA increased, primarily driven by a continued growth in oil demand around the globe and rerouting of trade flows. All in all, this has led to an increased proportional EBITDA, which was 10% higher than the same period last year when adjusted for divestments. Moving on to the cash flow generation. Our cash flow generation continued to be strong this first half year compared to the same period last year. We generated EUR 517 million of gross cash flows, generated by the group companies and strong dividend upstreaming from our joint ventures. Cash inflows from dividends were significantly higher year to date, compared to the same period last year. After tax payments, derivatives impact, and other cash flow from investing and financing activities, we had EUR 394 million cash flow from operations. This is the available cash flow that we can allocate towards operating CapEx, which is our license to operate, growth CapEx, and shareholder returns. Operating and growth CapEx amounted to around EUR 281 million year to date. As you can see, this quarter, annual dividends to our shareholders were paid, as well as the share buyback program, which was launched in February and is still progressing, accounting for a total cash out of EUR 395 million in total. Strong cash flow generation to be able to fund operating CapEx, growth projects, and to distribute value to shareholders remains our key priority. The strong focus on cash flow is well reflected on the per share metrics. We increased earnings per share by 80% compared to the same period two years ago. And also proportional free operating cash flow per share improved significantly to EUR 3.63 per share, which is a 32% improvement compared to two years ago. The share buyback program, of which we completed around 75% until now, further supports the value creation per share. This is just another example that portfolio transformation, clear cash focus, and the reduction of debt is creating significant value for our shareholders over the last two years. Total net debt to EBITDA went up to 2.28x this quarter, compared to end of 2023, when it was 1.99x, while still below our management range of 2.5x-3x total net debt to EBITDA. The increase in debt was mainly driven by shareholder distributions in the form of dividend and the mentioned share buyback program. Proportional leverage, which reflects the economic share of the joint venture debt, slightly increased to 2.67x compared to the end of 2, 2023, when it was 2.45x. Funding joint venture growth prospects is a focus area for us, and we continuously explore different funding options for our joint ventures. We recently extended a EUR 1 billion sustainability-linked revolving credit facility by one year. This credit facility will expire in 2029 and further support us in executing our strategy. On to the capital allocation strategy. Our disciplined capital allocation strategy remains unchanged. Our first priority is a robust balance sheet with a healthy leverage ratio between 2.5 and 3 times net debt to EBITDA. We are returning meaningful value to shareholders by the annual dividend, in line with our stable to progressive dividend policy, as well as executing a share buyback program of up to EUR 300 million. This is underpinned by our commitment to create and return value to shareholders. Last but not least, we see good opportunities to invest in attractive and accretive growth projects with an EBITDA multiple between 4x and 8x. As Dick mentioned already, we are updating our full year 2024 outlook, and I want to give some more detail on the drivers behind this. We see strong market indicators and favorable demand for our storage infrastructure. Together with a solid business performance, we continue to focus on improving our results. And thirdly, growth projects will contribute to our results in the quarters to come. Our strong performance and strategy execution, coupled with favorable market conditions, positions us well to update our outlook for full year 2024 upwards. We increased the proportional EBITDA outlook to a range of EUR 1,150 million-EUR 1,180 million for the full year, and the consolidated EBITDA range is increased to EUR 920 million-EUR 950 million for the full year 2024. Finally, the consolidated growth CapEx increased to around EUR 350 million, mainly due to timing effect of CapEx spend. Looking at the overall outlook, other elements remain unchanged. Consolidated operating CapEx is still expected to be around EUR 230 million. On the longer term, our proportional operating cash return to be above 12%, which we believe is a healthy return for our type of business in both favorable and unfavorable markets. Our commitment to invest EUR 1 billion in industrial and gas terminals and EUR 1 billion to accelerate towards new energies and sustainable feedstocks toward 2030 remains unchanged. We are committed to capture growth opportunities as we continue to see attractive projects beyond the EUR 1 billion ambition. Our leverage ratio remains 2.5-3 times as a management range, and our dividend policy remains unchanged. Bringing it all together in this slide, we delivered, first of all, on our financial performance. Despite investments, proportional EBITDA grew year-on-year. Operating cash return increased to 16.7% at the end of the half year. With our well-diversified portfolio in terms of the products we store and the different geographies we operate, we are able to create connections. And we are driving progress via our capabilities to capture new opportunities and growth investments. These factors combined create value to our shareholders. And this concludes my remarks in the presentation, and I would like to hand it back to Dick for the Q&A. Thank you, Michiel. With that, I'd like to ask the operator to please open the line for Q&A. Thank you. Ladies and gentlemen, if you would like to ask a question, please press star one on your telephone keypad. We'll pause for just a moment while waiting for them to queue for questions. Thank you. We will now take our first question from David Kerstens of Jefferies. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Hi, good morning, gentlemen. Well done on the 10% proportionate EBITDA growth. I had a couple of questions. Happy to take them one by one. Maybe first on the solid market demand that you discussed in the presentation. It sounds increasingly positive across all market segments. Maybe looking forward, where do you see the main risk to this favorable momentum that you're currently experiencing in the first half of this year? I think previously, I think you highlighted chemical storage in India, but maybe you have some other examples. Okay, you wanna go one by one indeed, David, or you wanna first, get all your questions in? Yeah, no, let's do it one by one. Okay, sounds good. Good morning. Hope everything well, and thanks for joining in the call. So indeed, solid demand. If you take a look on the gas side, so LNG, LPG, fairly stable, some variability always related to our situation in SPEC in Colombia because we're quite weather dependent there, so we've seen a good first half of the year. But there's some variability on the LNG side there. I think if you look at oil, indeed increasingly strong or still continue to be strong. So where you see the developments on the oil side, as we indicated on the hub locations, positive, high occupancy, high activity levels, limited, but still a little bit of room to further increase rates when contracts open up. But obviously, the bigger jump that we've seen over the past periods is that the opportunity is less going forward. But we're still seeing positive momentum and continued positive momentum going forward on the oil side. If I then move to chemicals, I think what you heard us say before was always a bit of uncertainty on the chemical side. That uncertainty, we've now said actually what is expected is that we expect it to be relatively stable to where we sit today. That doesn't mean that things are definitely improving on the chemical side, but it's stable from where we sit today. I think the main markets to then focus on for us is Singapore and the distribution chemical terminals that we are operating in Singapore. It's Belgium, and it's Deer Park. Deer Park performing well, Belgium and Singapore may be a bit more subject to some of these developments that are negative in the chemical markets, but as I said, relatively stable in the outlook. Then you obviously gonna ask me: What about China? Because you see some of the occupancy that is dropping in China, and that indeed is happening, but as a really significant impact on the overall, it's relatively limited, I would say. So I hope that gives you a bit of insight, a bit of flavor on where the markets stand. What is something big and a main risk that would happen? Yeah, there's always, I think, some variability on the chemical side, because even when contracts open up, we see opportunities to, to get some pressure from our customers, both from a rate perspective as well as from a, from a capacity perspective. And, and I would say that the longer term outlook on the oil side is, is maybe a bit of a question, but not the near-term outlook. So I, I think that, that, that gives you a bit of a, of an insight. Yeah, thank you very much. That's great. Maybe the second question on the Aegis capital in India. With the RIF investment, you're now almost at the EUR 1 billion budget that you had earmarked for 2030. Is that the main reason why you're looking at potentially external funding for the expansion of your joint venture with Aegis? Or can you also exceed that EUR 1 billion budget, which is on an IFRS basis, right? Yeah, thanks, David. No, it has, it's not linked to our ambition, but it is more looking at what is the best way of funding our growth trajectory in India. So we approved seven investment proposals last year, so we're building quite a bit at the moment. If you look at the potential pipeline, which is still there in India, it is still significant in terms of potential expansions. And so what we're presently doing is we're exploring all the options of how to fund the growth going forward into India. What is the best and most efficient and effective way of doing that? So no decision has been taken yet, but one of the options is to indeed list on the local Indian stock exchange. That could be one of the options, and as soon as we have taken a decision on that, we will definitely inform the market. But, there's no link to the EUR 1 billion or a way of looking differently at the ambition we have as a company. Understood. And then that one billion budget, is that set in stone, or does it mean we will not see many new investments in gas going forward now that you're already at EUR 900 million? Or how should- No, no, we continue to see good opportunities, and we won't stop when we pass the EUR 1 billion, as long as our position allows for that, and that looks positive and promising. So we see good opportunities. We'll continue to pursue them, David, and we'll, at the right time, probably beginning of 2025, make sure that we give proper guidance to the market on where we see that bucket of EUR 1 billion on industrial and gas, where our ambition sits for that amount going forward. But in the meantime, we continue to be very focused on, and there's some good and interesting opportunities. Yeah. And maybe a final question on the CapEx guidance that you provided. That's on an IFRS basis. I was wondering, the operating CapEx you keep stable at EUR 230 million. What is the comparable number for the joint ventures? Is that more or less similar? How should we look at that? And also, the increased growth investments of EUR 300 million, what would that be on a proportionate basis? Yeah. Good question, David. So, I don't know, I don't have the numbers off the top of my head, but indeed, these are all consolidated figures. Maybe what we are doing at the moment is, well, we're sort of a bit in transition, to be honest. So we have always reported on a consolidated basis, and you see that we're moving more towards proportional. From an EBITDA point of view, that journey will continue, because also the market is now asking much more on proportional information. So over time, we will also definitely change from consolidated CapEx numbers to proportional CapEx numbers. This analyst presentation, I think for the first time, we also included the proportional net debt to EBITDA, because that gives you an impression of, the leverage of the full portfolio, which is creating value for, the shareholders. But definitely, if you look at proportional, growth CapEx and proportional operating CapEx, they are higher than the consolidated. On the... I think on the proportional operating CapEx, it should be around EUR 270 million, and on the proportional growth CapEx, I need to look it up. I don't know off the top of my head. Okay, let's then take that offline. Thank you very much for, for the answers. You have a bit of an indication, David, if you look at the table, because the table shows EUR 900 million in terms of consolidated, which is then EUR 1.2 billion in the proportional. Yeah, that's all right. That gives you a bit of an indication on the difference between consolidated and proportional. Yeah, exactly. That's great. Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, and we'll now take our next question from Jeremy Kincaid of Van Lanschot Kempen. The line is open. Please go ahead. Good morning, all. I've got 3 questions. I'll read them all out in one go. The first one is just on the guidance. Like, obviously, I appreciate you've increased it a little bit, but when I look at proportional EBITDA, and I times the first half by two and make some adjustments for some one-offs, I still get to a full year number, which is above the top end of the range for proportional EBITDA. So I was just hoping if you could share some of your assumptions, that's obviously in your full year guidance, to help understand what you're assuming there. And then secondly, on market dynamics, I appreciate what you just said around solid demand, but clearly there's been an increase in shipping rates recently to very elevated levels. We saw, you know, similar levels post-COVID, and this was a bit of a catalyst, in my opinion, for some pretty strong storage rates. But, it sounds like we're not seeing that quite to the same degree as what we're seeing in the shipping rate market. I was just hoping for some comments around that. And then finally, on India, I understand you can't share too much around potential funding options, but clearly in that news report by CNBC, there was a discussion that maybe September could be a timing date for a draft IPO if you go down that path. Is that timing consistent with your thinking? Thank you. Yeah, maybe on the first question, on the guidance, and I can also understand the question, because I think the proportional EBITDA indeed in the first half year, close to EUR 600 million. So what we disclosed to the market is effectively the major one-off items, yeah? So, that I think has been very transparent. What we tend to do in the company is we really look at the underlying business results. So sometimes you also have smaller one-offs in your results. So we look at the underlying business results, the run rate of that. Effectively, we look at. Well, we have a divestment done, and we look at the growth ambitious projections for the second half, but the net of it will be relatively limited for the results. So then we effectively look at underlying business performance. We know that costs are slightly creeping up, because labor rate increases are kicking in first of April. So you saw that the second quarter is a bit higher than the first quarter, and then we effectively add back, let's say, the realized one-offs, and then we come to our range. And then, well, it is in, it is in our range, but if you do the math, then you probably will not get into that range. But, yeah, we can't give you all the details on that because that would be too detailed, but that is, that is how we do it. Maybe then, Jeremy, to the other two questions, so maybe first one on the comparison and dynamics between storage rates and shipping rates. We haven't seen that so much in the past. I would say shipping rates are much more cyclical than we typically tend to see on the storage side. Obviously, shipping rates going up, and when we talk shipping rates, it... I mean, there's a wide variety in shipping rates. Generally speaking, we haven't seen a large correlation between what happens on shipping the commodities that we store, since a lot of the contracts that are being closed on the storage side are really long term. And the supply chains still have to continue to move rather than whether the shipping rate is high or low. So you actually, we don't see big volume impacts, and we also don't see big rate impacts directly correlated to shipping rates. I think that's the first part, or the answer to your second question, I should say. And then on India and the timeline in September that you indicate, we cannot comment on that. So we will make the announcement or an announcement when we have clarity and when a decision is taken or not on this topic going forward. For now, we just stick to what we said in the earlier press release and, and also stick to what Michiel said earlier. It's an option to investigate. We're looking at alternatives, and when we have reached a conclusion, we will make sure we communicate that well and, so keep... Stay posted. Understood. Thanks very much. Yeah. Thank you, and we'll now take our next question from Thijs Berkelder of ABN AMRO. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Thijs, you might want to check on your mute button, please. Yes, now I'm in, probably. Yeah, now we can hear you. Sorry for that. Congrats with the strong result. Couple of questions. Can you explain why corporate costs in Q2 were so much higher than in Q1, and can you maybe give guidance on the following quarters on corporate costs? Second question is on the open season on Eems Energy. I think it ends on July 31, but maybe can you give an indication on how that open season is developing so far? Then, results U.S.A. in Q2 were clearly stronger than in Q1, while normally they're a bit weaker. Can you maybe give an explanation there? For now, finally, maybe can you explain what kind of impact there is from the current weakness in the biofuel market? Okay, let me start then with your first question, and then I hand it over to Dick for the open season question. Yeah, on the corporate cost, indeed, it was higher in the second quarter, but that had to do with some insurance costs, Thijs. I would not, you never know on the insurance side, of course, but what happened, but if, let's say, a business runs smoothly, then you would expect that the corporate cost should come down in the second half of the year versus the first half of the year. So that's the quick explanation of the shift between Q2 and Q1. I think the next one on the open season in Eems, haven't... Too early to comment. We haven't heard anything back from the results. We need to compile them, and we get it all in, and then study and see what the next steps are going to be. So, we'll keep you informed when there's something to share. And then maybe on the U.S.A., where that improved, it's mainly Deer Park. Deer Park actually did quite well. And we had a one-off settlement with our neighbor related to an incident of a few years back that helped us, but also first contribution from the project, the growth project that we started, what was it? A year, year and a half ago. So actually, the U.S. and Deer Park specifically is, is performing quite well. I heard only the start of your fourth question, so maybe you can repeat it. It had something to do with bio. Can you, can you say it again, please, Thijs? Yeah, what kind of impact you see of the weakness in the biofuel market, right now? ... Yeah, so the way we look at it, Tice, and it's obviously we're following it closely, I think there's a few ways to look at. On the feedstock side, in countries of origin, talking about India, Brazil, to a certain extent also Singapore, sometimes Malaysia, we see actually positive development or still continued healthy development, I would say. You see on the production capacity of some of the biofuels, so the renewable diesels and sustainable aviation fuel, that there's quite a bit of pressure on the capacity that is in the market, and the economics medium term and short term are not looking that great. Longer term, when the demand mandates are falling more in line with the supply that has already been put into place, we expect the longer term outlook, as I said in the presentation as well, still to be very, very positive. But this remains a bit of a period where that supply of production, basically, with the demand is adjusting. And again, in the feedstock markets, we're quite comfortable. In the end markets, we have mainly quite a bit of long-term contracts in place that serve us well, and we keep on monitoring that, but there's no reason to be concerned in our view, at least from what we see now. But, for instance, looking at Shell's decision to delay the further build out of the- Yeah ... the biorefinery in Rotterdam, maybe does not have impact for you, let's say, this year, but, potentially, maybe yes, for next year? Not expected, Tice, at this moment. We have no indications that it would have any impact on where we sit, and we're still serving that market from the capacity that we constructed and took into operation in Vlaardingen. That is contributing well this year, and there's no indication that we see any change over there, and if we see that, we will let you know. Oh, yeah, and then maybe one additional question on potential sanctions on Russian LNG coming to Europe. Can you maybe indicate what percentage of your incoming LNG flows is, let's say, labeled Russian? No, we—well, directly to that part of your question, we cannot. The sanctions, if they come in, or when they come in the middle of 2025, it has to do with resale, so redistribution from Russian flows that would come into European, Northwest European LNG terminals. But that flow is hard to see that that would materialize at any of our terminals, I think that's one. And I think the pure import of Russian LNG into infrastructure that is connected to the main pipeline grid in Europe is not subject to any sanctions as we see it now. And our two terminals, both Eems as well as Gate, are part of... are connected to the main central pipeline gas grid in Europe, and therefore continue to be an integral part for the gas supply into Europe. So, and then followed by that is our, obviously our generic statement is we continue to follow this very closely, and if there is a moment that we need to make a change in the type of products that we can accept, we will do that according to the rules and regulations of this of the sanctions policy that is that are continuously evolving. Okay. Thank you. Yeah. Clear. Okay. You're welcome. Thank you, and we'll now move on to our next question from André Mulder of Kepler Cheuvreux. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Yeah, good morning. Two questions remaining. Yeah. ... the first one, comparing the market dynamics that you display in Q1 and Q2 could not detect much of a change, maybe except for energy, which seems a bit more muted. Can you spend a few words on that? Don't think it's that much muted, André. Good morning. I think we're already at a relatively healthy and high levels. If there's anything that you interpret as being muted, it's maybe the quarter-over-quarter comparison. So the Q2 improvement versus Q1 is limited, versus maybe Q1 and what we've seen in 2023. If that's the nuance, then that's rightfully picked up, but it has more to do with the limited potential to further improve, rather than that there's something fundamentally that we're seeing happening. I think at that high level, at the same time, of occupancy and rates, you become naturally also a little bit dependent on the actual ancillary services that we always have in any market segment. And if you're already at a relatively healthy level, then maybe a slight variation on these ancillary revenues in the places like Singapore and Fujairah and Rotterdam, that might have some impact. But by and large, from what we see, we're still quite positive and optimistic on the outlook for energy and oil markets. Fantastic. Yeah? Okay. Second question is on CO2 next. Can you give any indication of what kind of CapEx we should think about? You mentioned the capacity, but any amount that you can share with us? I don't think we've shared an amount up until now. And although we may like to do that, especially also in with respect to the partnership that we operate in, André, I hope you appreciate that we cannot do that at this time. When we make further announcement closer to the investment decision in 2025, we hope to be able to give you proper guidance over there. It's the project that we're working on is liquid CO2 receiving installation in Rotterdam. In I would say the greater complex, if that makes sense, where Porthos and Aramis is going to be hosting their equipment on the Maasvlakte. So very close, actually adjacent to the Gate and MOT site. It's in that area, receiving liquid CO2, storing it, and from there, connecting it through booster pumps and compressors to the offshore infrastructure, where it's going to be stored. So we're excited about that as an opportunity, excited to work with TotalEnergies and Shell, as well as Gasunie in that consortium, and even more excited for the experience that we will build up if this moves ahead, because it allows us to play an important role also in these type of solutions in other parts of the world and in other parts of our network. So by and large, it's a, it's a positive development. Happy to move into feed, but unfortunately, the direct number of investment is, is at this point, not possible to share with you. But I hope with what I just explained on the type of infrastructure that we're building, that it might give you at least a little bit of an indication where that is hinting to, so. Okay, thanks. Yeah, you're welcome. We will now take our last question from Quirijn Mulder of ING. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Thank you. A couple of questions from my side. So first of all, about Zhangjiagang. It looks like that the pressure continues on this utilization. In my view, it's something like 70% or even lower. So when are you going to take measures on Zhangjiagang after a couple of years of... in the performance? That's my first question. My second question is about the growth contributions, EUR 42 million in the first half year. How important—so that is Vlaardingen and Los Angeles and, let me say, Eemshaven. How important is Eemshaven in that total? Because according to my models, it should be in the range of more than half of that total EUR 42 million. And my third question with regard to ammonia. I didn't. I, I missed that word, so I would like to be updated with regard to ammonia, with regard to the Houston Ship Channel, let me say the project there. The project as regard the gas players and the ammonia storage there, and also maybe to be updated on what's happening with regard to the plans for ammonia import in the Maasvlakte in Rotterdam. That were my questions for this moment. Okay, good morning, Quirijn. Let me start with the second question, and then Dick will tackle question one and question three on Zhangjiagang and ammonia. So yeah, on the growth contributions, how important is Eems? Is it more than half? Yeah, it is more than half of that number, so that's what I can confirm. Maybe on Zhangjiagang. Indeed, the occupancy in Zhangjiagang is hovering around that 70%-75% of occupancy. We still have good confidence that the longer-term outlook for a terminal with that capacity and footprint is attractive for us to continue to own and operate in China. We're continuously looking at optimizing the performance and the results by looking at the cash flow profile of the company and anything that we can influence, whether it's top line cost or operating CapEx, but we're comfortable in the position that we are today. Again, for China and an asset of this size and at this location, long term, we have no reason to doubt the future. So I think that's on Zhangjiagang. If you then want to talk about or hear something about ammonia, indeed a lot, too, that is happening in ammonia. If I would put it on a bit of a high level, I would almost say we're moving from hype to realism in the low carbon hydrogen space, and therefore, low carbon ammonia as a carrier for that. What I mean with it is maybe the noise and the general sentiment might be a bit subdued because some of the projects are being pushed out longer term or maybe even postponed. I think if you look on the ground to the attractiveness of some of the supply chains that are gonna be building and the realism that is being put in, I'm actually quite encouraged by what I see in that sense. And I base that on what I see happening in places like Japan, Korea, what I see happening in terms of demand development for low carbon ammonia in a place like Singapore that needs to be fed, and the third one is ARA. So both Antwerp and Rotterdam, where you definitely see the willingness to start committing to ammonia imports in the coming period between now and 2030, is quite real and realistic, and it needs to be supplied by Middle Eastern and U.S. materials. So that's the overarching comment. If I then zoom in specifically on your question on VH, on the Houston Ship Channel, there, I think the supply chain that we are looking after is still in development, depends on also the details of the IRA credits that our potential customers are gonna be able to obtain in Houston. It's still, from our point of view, from a location, an experience, and a consortium point of view, an attractive project, which is continued to be worked on and developed. I expect a little bit more clarity on that also after the U.S. elections in the second part of this year. That's on Houston, on Europe, so both Antwerp and Rotterdam. So the Vopak piece of land in Antwerp, as well as the opportunities that we're developing together with Gasunie in the port of Rotterdam, there's a lot of interest. There's a lot of interest from parties that want to actually supply the ammonia and maybe crack it even from ammonia straight into low carbon hydrogen to the local industrial users in the industrial cluster in Rotterdam and in Antwerp. And we are very active and actively developing our proposition over there. So, yeah, I think that's the best that I can say for now, without going into all the exact details, which there are many, as you can imagine. Okay. Yeah. Thank you. My final question on Vlaardingen, maybe. If that whole project in Shell Pernis is not going forward and being canceled, do you have alternative clients on the list you can approach to let me say, to fill your storage? Yeah, we feel we have, but for now we have a customer. And obviously, that's also the customer that we are discussing how to deal with this, but as I said to Thijs's question earlier, we don't expect impact in the medium to long, or the shorter to medium term, and need to also find out what the final decision is going to be of the Shell project in Pernis, which currently is postponed. We don't know if it's permanently postponed, what will happen in between. The demand, I think that's the most important thing, Quirijn, demand for the end product is definitely expected to be there and maybe slightly delayed, and maybe the economics not as attractive to produce, but the demand for the end product is gonna be there. The infrastructure is state-of-the-art, so we're actually confident that that will continue to play its role in those biofuels markets. Okay, thank you. Yeah, you're welcome, Quirijn. Thank you. We've got a final follow-up question from Thijs Berkelder. Your line is open, please go ahead. Yeah, it's Berkelder again, ABN AMRO. A follow-up question on potential and new projects still in the pipeline. Can you maybe give us sort of an update, timeline for your potentially new LNG import facility in South Africa? Similar for Australia, on the potential timing of the terminal plans in Japan, and when we can expect, let's say, an update on Antwerp. Okay. Not sure if I can give you a specific to all, but maybe start in South Africa. We're working together in the consortium with TPL, our partner over there, which is the equivalent, I would say, of the Gasunie, the owner and operator of the pipeline grid, the gas pipeline grid. We're ending, sort of equivalent of open season, and we have to go through different stages of the open season, to gauge market interest and define also the scope of the project that we plan to do, while at the same time, we are preparing, with that scope and the engineering that needs to be done, the permit application and making sure that we get the license to actually start, the potential import for LNG into Richards Bay. Too early to comment on the exact timeline when the investment decision is going to be taken, but I expect towards the end of this year and beginning of 2025, definitely some more news around the next bigger phase of the project. So far, things are looking positive in terms of the overall logic and sentiment around creating an opportunity for LNG imports into South Africa. I think that's the first one. The second one is Australia, that's Victoria LNG. Also there, from a conceptual point of view, makes a lot of sense to look into the opportunity to develop LNG import through FSRU in that particular area of Australia. And we are working and are in the process of defining the next steps in that project. Happy to keep you informed next call on where we are on this. But still, from a market attractiveness, we find that an interesting opportunity, yet at the same time, not the easiest to execute, since it will take quite a bit of time and effort to develop the opportunity and get the permits for it. I think that's the second thing, is it something on Japan? I would say a little bit more early stage. We opened the office in Japan. We are definitely, I would say, present in that market in Japan. That helps us quite a bit by creating the connections between the Japanese parties looking overseas, as well as the ones that are actually developing and have a need to develop infrastructure in Japan. So that combination helps us quite a bit, and we now get the first traction also on maybe early stage, early, early stage, some of the opportunities in Japan itself. But too early to already indicate it's a dislocation, potentially, and it's creating some substance. But from where we were 12 months ago, we're definitely seeing, first of all, it's a good idea to have a presence over there. And second, that the story of Vopak in Japan, being the one that is, that is willing and capable of developing shared infrastructure, creating economies of scale, repurposing existing assets into creating that shared infrastructure, is a story that is well-received and resonates with a lot of people. So we continue to push hard on the opportunities. And then last but not least, Vopak, so that's Antwerp. The project is developing well in terms of the execution and the demolition of all the equipment, being tanks and the old refinery that was on the site, so the site looks completely different. You may have seen some of the video footage of the big towers that were brought down in the past month. That's quite impressive to see, and you physically see that it's taking shape, and it's a virgin plot of land. Developments for a wide variety of solutions going forward are in full force, and we hope to be able to get more news when it's there. But it centers around potential production for people that want to produce on the land, and we would then do the offsites for it, so the storage offsites do a role on the new energy side. And that is on the ammonia and derivatives of it on the side as well. So we're looking at all the opportunities and are really, really very excited that we have such a big plot of land at a prime location in the Port of Antwerp. So, stay tuned. Okay. Thank you very much. You're welcome. Thank you. There are no further questions in queue. This concludes today's call. Thank you for your participation. You may now disconnect. Thank you. Bye-bye.