Hello, and good afternoon, and welcome to our presentation for Aker Carbon Capture's first quarter results for 2022. My name is David Phillips, I'm the head of the U.K. and Investor Relations, and I'm delighted to be joined by our CEO, Valborg Lundegaard, and our CFO, Egil Fagerland, to talk through our results. Today's agenda, we're gonna talk through with Valborg first to look through some of the highlights of the quarter, talk a little bit about ESG and some of the main events, then Egil will run through financials, also with some comments around the outlook for 2022, and then we'll take your questions. Just to remind you on the system, you can put your questions into the system any time, and when we get to that point of the presentation, we will try and take as many as we have time to allow. Valborg, over to you. Good afternoon. This is the agenda for our presentation today. Just to give you an outline of what we will be discussing following an active and interesting first quarter. We will address the highlights of the quarter, our areas of focus for ESG, trends in the carbon capture market, our operation and business development, the financial highlights of the quarter, the way forward for our strategy, and finally, we'll move to Q&A. First, before we start with the highlights from Q1, we have a short introduction to the company. Aker Carbon Capture is a pure -play CCUS company with the strength of the wider Aker group behind it. We see many important benefits from this structure, including our customers will have our full attention, and for investors, this opens up for investment in a pure play company, not a conglomerate of segments. Our proprietary technology has been developed over 20 years, and it's validated through over 50,000 operating hours and certified for several applications. Aker Carbon Capture's technology is cost-effective, robust, and flexible, meaning it can be applied to existing plants or new builds. The process uses a non-toxic biodegradable mixture of water and organic amine solvents to absorb the CO2, and has a market-leading HSE profile. When our customers come to us, they want to reduce their emissions and not introduce new emissions or hazardous chemicals. That is why our technology's unique HSE characteristics are also a commercial differentiator. Now, the highlights of the quarter. Both the Brevik CCS and the Twence CCU projects are progressing according to schedule. At Brevik, the first carbon capture project at a cement facility in the world, we have placed all major purchase orders. On-site activity will pick up in June this year, and the main installation work will take place in 2023. Also, at Twence in the Netherlands, we're moving forward as planned. This first-of-a-kind modular plant will enable the removal of CO2 from flue gases at Twence's waste-to-energy facility, with captured CO2 to be used by greenhouses to enhance plant growth. Our work has commenced on the FEED for BP's Net Zero Teesside Power in the U.K. as part of a consortium including Aker Solutions, Siemens Energy, and Doosan Babcock. This is the world's first commercial-scale gas-fired power station with carbon capture and marks a very important step forward for large-scale CCS. We've continued to position for the future market through a significant and growing number of studies and tenders for customers. In the latest IPCC report, CCUS remains central to climate mitigation strategies. Overall, that connects to the message of hope that IPCC included. Humanity has the tools to decarbonize. In the first quarter, we continued to sign important MOUs. Together with Microsoft, we want to pursue joint innovation and explore opportunities to offer services in the CCUS market. Secondly, with Northern Lights, to build on learnings from the Longship project and enable the accelerated deployment of CCS projects across Europe. As we mentioned at our Q4 report in February, we also signed MOUs focusing on the transportation and storage team with Höegh LNG and Dan-Unity CO2. We've also signed a collaboration agreement with SINTEF to accelerate the transfer of science and research to innovation in the market. When we look at the financial results, I'm happy to share that through the past quarter, we've seen continued strong revenue growth. Overall revenue for the first quarter was NOK 144 million, and we have a healthy cash position at NOK 1.5 billion. In March, we signed an MOU with Microsoft to pursue joint innovation and explore opportunities to offer services in the CCUS market. By fully using the digital capabilities and domain expertise of our two companies, we can support industrial emitters to take action and accelerate the deployment of CCUS. Aker Carbon Capture and Microsoft will demonstrate the full value chain of carbon reduction and carbon removal, utilizing our proprietary carbon capture technology and Microsoft's digital capabilities to enable the ecosystem for the voluntary carbon market, providing traceability and data, ensuring high-quality carbon credits. This MOU strengthens our legacy of successful collaboration. Last year, we jointly signed an MOU with Danish energy company Ørsted to explore opportunities to deploy carbon capture at bioenergy plants in Denmark. In February, we signed an MOU with Northern Lights to collaborate on the realization of CCS projects in Norway and across Europe. Northern Lights is developing an open and flexible infrastructure to transport CO2 from industrial emitters by ship to a receiving terminal on the west coast of Norway for intermediate storage, before being transported by pipeline for permanent storage in a geological reservoir 2,600 m under the seabed. Operations are scheduled to start in 2024. To the Longship project, Norway has taken a leadership position in enabling industrial decarbonization through CCS. This collaboration between Northern Lights and Aker Carbon Capture aims to build on learnings from the Longship project and enable the accelerated deployment of CCS projects across Europe. Together with Northern Lights and with our Carbon Capture as a Service offering, we can now further develop source-to-storage decarbonization on a pay-per-tonne of captured CO2 model. In March, we entered into a strategic collaboration agreement with SINTEF, which is one of Europe's largest independent research organizations with international top-level expertise in the fields of technology, natural science, medicine, and social science. SINTEF has conducted research on CCUS since its inception in the 1980s. Aker and SINTEF have collaborated for more than 25 years. Our goal will be to further develop CCUS technology together to reduce CO2 emissions from industry and energy solutions. With this agreement, we accelerate the transfer of science and research to innovation in the market. The partnership with SINTEF and access to their significant testing infrastructure and knowledge of CCUS and enabling technologies will not only allow Aker Carbon Capture to continue to improve our existing technology portfolio, but also enable us to collaboratively identify the next generation CCUS technology and bring it to the market. To complete our progress on partnerships in Q1, we also signed two MOUs focused on transport and storage part of the value chain. As we have stated before, the progression of viable transport and storage infrastructure is ultimately one of the most important drivers for project timing for CCS, and we believe that working closely with key players in this area has the potential to accelerate the implementation of CCS overall. Firstly, we have signed a collaboration agreement with Dan-Unity CO2 of Denmark. Dan-Unity CO2 is the world's first carbon capture and storage-specific shipping entity, established by Danish shipping companies Evergas and Navigator Gas. Secondly, we signed a collaboration agreement with Altera Infrastructure and Höegh LNG, which are global maritime and infrastructure companies providing services in the CCS value chain. Now, I want to spend a few minutes revisiting some important targets and ambitions for Aker Carbon Capture, focusing here on our carbon footprint and ESG. The first target is to improve the carbon intensity of our products by 50% by 2030. This means that we will further reduce the carbon emitted during the construction of our products relative to the carbon captured from current level of 0.2% for Just Catch and 1.6% for Big Catch. The second target is to reach a carbon negative position through carbon removal solutions by 2030. We know that carbon removal is needed for the world to reach net zero, and we believe that those who can should do more, and that is why we have set this target. It will require a dedicated effort across the company to reach these targets, such as continuously improve our technology in areas such as capture rate and energy efficiency, collaboration both with the supply chain, with low carbon materials and strategic partners such as transport and storage to reduce the footprint of the full value chain. Lastly, purchase of guarantee of origin for renewable power for our plants in operation. We will continue to focus to realize carbon removals for our customers, as well as utilize carbon removal solutions to reach our own carbon negative target. We are also pleased to share some early highlights. The First Movers Coalition is set to fast-track the development of emerging green technologies. Aker ASA is a founding member and will, together with some of the world's largest companies, work to create predictability around demand for sustainable and low carbon materials and products. We have issued our commitment letter to the Science Based Targets initiative, and we will continue to collaborate with them to get our targets approved. Now we move into our commentary on the CCUS market as a whole. Although we've only seen a few months of 2022, already there have been numerous developments in this fast-growing market in terms of overall market outlook and in terms of policy support. Firstly, we know that the latest major report from the IPCC, this report focused on the possible and potential routes to limit climate change and outlined a clear need for carbon capture with both storage and utilization in addition to CDRs, that is carbon dioxide removal, to limit and to mitigate the extent of global warming. The most recent survey from energy market analyst BNEF highlighted a strong increase in global investment into CCUS in the coming years, with the market set to see a cumulative spend of some $52 billion by mid-decade, and further strong growth thereafter. Analysts at Rystad see the CCUS market with a value of up to $55 billion annually by 2030. This projection falls short of the carbon capture capacity indicated in the IEA scenario for net zero emissions by 2050, which indicates the industry's capacity needs to grow by 8x-11x by around the end of this decade. Clearly, this need for carbon capture means our industry is set for considerable long-term growth. We've also seen clear momentum in the area of voluntary carbon removals, with a number of corporate emitters paying significantly higher prices for their carbon offset agreements, and trading platforms growing to enable emitters and carbon removal projects to transact more easily. This market is also expected to scale over the coming years. Policy support continues to be firm, with a number of updates from Europe and North America. In Europe, there has been clear support for the stability and function of the EU ETS carbon market, including extending the MSR, the Market Stability Reserve, withdrawal rate at 24%. In North America, Canada set out its 2030 emission reduction plan that aims for a 40% reduction in emissions by 2030 versus those in 2005, and net zero by 2050. This includes significant investment in CCUS, also supported by a carbon pricing regime that sees CO2 at CAD 170 per ton by 2030. In the US, industry progress continues to accelerate, with a number of carbon capture-related funding arrangements from the Department of Energy, and a strategic vision towards net zero 2050 from the Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management. Now we move on to look in more detail at our business strategy. Since mid-2020, Aker Carbon Capture has focused on the European market, with Scandinavia, Benelux, and U.K. leading the way. Here, the interest from customers continues to be the highest, and the regulatory environment to support adoption of CCUS continue to be the most mature. We also note that increased policy support and early-stage corporate activity around CCUS markets in North America. We continue to prioritize four market segments where our technology has been tested and certified. Cement, where we are now delivering the first facility in the world to capture CO2 at Brevik CCS. Bio and waste to energy, where we are delivering a modular Just Catch facility for Twence. Gas to power, where we are delivering a FEED for BP's Net Zero Teesside Power. And blue hydrogen, where we have validated our carbon capture technology for SMR hydrogen production for Preem. We also see good engagement with a number of additional sectors where our technology is well suited to capture CO2, such as smelting, pulp and paper, and engineered carbon or char. Now, an update on where we are in terms of our future business progress and outlook. As a reminder, when we were established in 2020, we set out an ambitious target to secure contracts covering 10 million tons of CO2 by 2025, our 10 in 2025 target. We visualized our progress towards this across four categories. One, secured development contracts, then secured FEED contracts, then tenders and studies, and finally, prospects. There is a range of probability of the work becoming a firm contract, with the highest being with already sanctioned developments and the lowest with our long-term prospects. Here, the 0.5 million tons represent our already secured EPC work with Norcem and Twence. The feed category, 4 million tons per annum, which reflects the Net Zero Teesside Power, as well as other major non-disclosed work. We have the tenders we are currently involved in and studies we do for our customers. This work represents a very active part of our business development and is equivalent to around 5.5 million tons per year. This has increased in the recent month from the 3 million tons we highlighted at our Q4 results earlier this year, and reflects a number of significant new studies in the waste-to-energy sector and also with a major cement plant with Titan Cement in Greece. This means that so far we have effectively matured almost 10 million tons per year of prospects into firm contracts, feed studies, and tenders. Finally, we have the prospects. These are the potential opportunities on our radar screen where we are in early discussion. Now we turn to our key industry segment, starting with the cement industry. We are proud to be selected by Norcem, HeidelbergCement for the Brevik CCS EPC delivery, the world's first carbon capture project at a cement facility. Our carbon capture technology has been successfully tested in Brevik over several years with our mobile test unit. The plant will have superior heat integration with the existing cement plant and will capture 400,000 ton of CO2 per year. The EPC project commenced in January 2021. Key milestones have been achieved according to schedule and all major purchase order placed. On-site activity will pick up in June this year, and the main installation work will take place in 2023. The Brevik CCS project is part of Longship, the greatest climate project in Norwegian industry ever. This is a full CCS value chain development, including Brevik CCS, as well as the transportation and storage project Northern Lights. Longship will be in operation in 2024. The cement industry represents 6%-7% of the global CO2 emissions, and CCS is a key solution to decarbonize this hard-to-abate sector. Our second prioritized market segment is the bio and waste to energy. We started the Twence CCU EPC project in the fourth quarter last year. The project will enable removal of CO2 from flue gases at Twence's waste-to-energy facility in the Netherlands, and the captured CO2 will be used in greenhouses to boost plant growth. This Just Catch plant is a first-of-a-kind modular product in the carbon capture industry with a capacity of 100,000 tons of CO2 per year. The groundbreaking ceremony in Hengelo is mid-May, putting us on track for startup end 2023. Looking at Norway, Aker Carbon Capture and BIR are exploring carbon capture at BIR's waste-to-energy plant in Bergen on Norway's west coast, close to the Northern Lights terminal. Earlier, we signed an MOU with Lyse and Forus Energi to explore development of a full-scale CCS facility in the Stavanger-Sandnes region in southwestern Norway. Traveling a bit south, we have signed an MOU with Ørsted and Microsoft to explore the development of carbon removals at Ørsted biomass-fired heat and power plants in Denmark. Finally, in the U.K., we announced an MOU with Viridor to focus on accelerating decarbonization at its waste-to-energy sites and the delivery of five modular Just Catch plants within 2030. At Redcar Energy Centre, another waste-to-energy site, we are studying the implementation of a large-scale carbon capture plant, which is part of the vision for Net Zero Teesside Power. Our third prioritized market segment is carbon capture for large-scale gas-to-power plants. In the fourth quarter, we secured a FEED study for BP's Net Zero Teesside Power in the U.K., where Aker Carbon Capture is the technology partner to a consortium of Aker Solutions, Siemens Energy, and Doosan Babcock. The facility at Net Zero Teesside Power will have an electric output of up to 860 MW and a carbon capture capacity of about 2 million tons per year. This will be the world's first commercial-scale gas-fired power station with carbon capture. The CO2 transportation and storage infrastructure will be developed by the Northern Endurance Partnership to serve the East Coast Cluster, confirmed as Track-1 in the U.K. Industrial Decarbonization Strategy. The U.K. government announced that its ambitions for CCS are between 20 and 30 million tons of CO2 per annum by 2030. The announcement also includes the selection of Track-1 clusters, HyNet and East Coast, which will begin decarbonizing U.K. industry from 2026. Now we see the market response to this. One major example is that SSE and Equinor have submitted proposals to the U.K. government's Phase-2 cluster sequencing for CCUS deployment for its plant, Keadby 3 carbon capture power station and Peterhead carbon capture power station. Now our fourth prioritized segment, blue hydrogen. We continue to see the need for both green and blue hydrogen to reduce emissions. IEA estimates that 33% and 38% of the global hydrogen market to be blue in 2030 and 2050 respectively. There are a number of prospects in this segment, for instance, the Aukra Blue Hydrogen project in northwestern Norway. We note blue hydrogen is also EU taxonomy aligned as a carbon-efficient process. Today, I want to highlight our extensive work with post-combustion carbon capture for SMRs, steam methane reformer hydrogen plants. We have run over 3,000 hours of carbon capture on the SMR hydrogen unit at Preem's Lysekil facility in Sweden with strong results, including sustained high capture rates of around 90% CO2. Very good solvent stability, as you can see from the picture on the lower right side, very efficient energy performance, and importantly, promising energy cost savings from recycling waste heat at the facility. This complements our innovative cryogenic pre-combustion capture technology that is under development together with SINTEF, which worked at large scale ATRs, auto-thermal reforming hydrogen plants. Now our CFO, Egil Fagerland, will take us through business model development and financials. Thank you, Valborg. We have essentially two main product offerings in Aker Carbon Capture, Big Catch, which can handle 400,000 tons and more of CO2 per year, and the standardized Just Catch solution, which targets 40,000 and 100,000 tons per year. The Just Catch is also available in the larger modular offshore version. It can, for instance, be used on FPSO vessels. We can deliver either of these on the EPC project basis, and for the Big Catch offering, we can also deliver it on a license and key equipment basis. Our standardized Just Catch offering is the heart of our Carbon Capture as a Service business model. For Carbon Capture as a Service, our estimated levelized cost for the full value chain offering is a range between EUR 70 and EUR 150 per ton. There's no change since the Q4 report, but as a reminder, back in Q3 2021, we presented a range between EUR 75 and EUR 145 per ton. What we have changed this quarter, if you look closely at the chart, are the error bars. In general, these have widened, reflecting, you know, the current uncertainty around costs, energy costs, and other aspects such as transport and storage solutions. For comparison, the EUA is now at almost 90 EUR per ton, and most recent analyst 2030 targets range between EUR 80-EUR 150 per ton. The CapEx for the Just Catch plant, including liquefaction, temporary storage, and financing, is in an estimated range of EUR 30-EUR 45 per ton of CO2. This range reflects efficiency gains through implementation of serial production, which is partly offsetting cost inflations that we've seen in the market lately. We are currently delivering a Just Catch 100 to Twence, we are placing purchase orders, and this has confirmed our cost estimates shared in this graph. The OpEx, including solvent supply, energy, digital operation center, labor, and maintenance, covers a range of EUR 10- EUR 45 per ton of CO2. As we commented last quarter, further engagement with our customers has allowed us to identify a larger number of opportunities where we can reclaim excess heat, which significantly reduces energy costs. In addition, further potential for plant automation has been identified through digitalization. The highest range we see for transport and storage, with EUR 30-EUR 60 per ton as the cost range, and the cost will vary mainly related to the distance from the emissions source to the available storage site. Transportation and storage infrastructure projects are large in nature, and we've widened the error bar to reflect the risk of cost inflation for such projects that are upcoming. The EUA or the EU ETS has so far in 2022 been relatively volatile and now stands at EUR 85 per ton. The volatility seen in Q1 is influenced by the geopolitical unrest related to the war in Ukraine, energy security concerns, and prices for power generation such as coal and natural gas. Despite the recent volatility, it's worth noting that European Parliament voted in favor of maintaining the 24% MSR intake rate until 2030, rather than allowing it to drop to 12% from 2023. This proposal still needs EU council approval, but we see it as a clear commitment to the EU ETS as a key tool to drive down emissions. Analyst targets that we follow continue to be in a range between EUR 80-EUR 150 per ton in 2030, and this is supported by the IEA Sustainable Development Scenario at EUR 120 per ton to achieve Paris-aligned emission reduction targets. These prices compare with a range for levelized cost of carbon capture as a service based on our Just Catch facility, and some of those projects are profitable already at EUR 70 per ton. Now, I will take you through the key financial highlights of the first quarter. Bear in mind that all the numbers that I mentioned are in Norwegian kroner. Let's start with the income statement. Overall revenue for the first quarter was NOK 144 million, which was up 127% compared to the same period last year. This reflects increasing activity on the Brevik CCS Project, which is continuing to progress according to schedule. In addition, new projects such as Twence Just Catch EPC and BP Net Zero Teesside FEED contributed significantly to our revenues. Our Mobile Test Unit was in operation in Poland, and we saw an increased activity for pre-FEED and feasibility studies in the first quarter. Our reported first quarter EBITDA was negative NOK 61 million, which was a decrease of NOK 31 million from the same quarter last year. Profit has not yet been recognized on Brevik CCS EPC and Twence Just Catch EPC. We will start recognizing profit when the project outcome and estimates can be more reliably measured. However, compared to the fourth quarter in 2021, the increased resource utilization that we now see, due to additional projects in our backlog has impacted the EBITDA favorably in this quarter. FEED, pre-FEED, Mobile Test Unit campaigns, and feasibility studies also contributed positively to the EBITDA in this quarter. The overall negative EBITDA continued to be driven by activity related to research and development projects, digitalization projects, tenders, business development, sales, and international growth activities, in particular in U.K. and Denmark. Now over to the balance sheet. Our first quarter net current operating assets ended -NOK 491 million, which represented a strong positive cash position on key projects. Overall operating assets and liabilities represented by net capital employed was -NOK 470 million. This signals that our business activities are currently funded by working capital and other liabilities. We have a very healthy cash position at NOK 1.5 billion, which could cover our liabilities more than two times. Finally, our equity remains strong at NOK 1 billion at the end of the first quarter. On the cash flow, we started the first quarter with NOK 1,321 million in cash and cash equivalents. Through the quarter, we saw an overall change in our cash position of NOK 164 million inflow. The major drivers were loss before tax, change in net current operating assets, and CapEx. The loss before tax represented a cash outflow of NOK 60 million. The net current operating assets represented a cash inflow of NOK 229 million, mainly related to project cash receipts. CapEx, mainly related to the building of a new Mobile Test Unit, product development, and standardization efforts for our products, and that represented a cash outflow of NOK 6 million. In total, our cash and cash equivalents ended the first quarter at NOK 1,485 million. Now to our financial outlook. Here we outline some key figures for our financial outlook, and this remains in line with what we presented in the fourth quarter presentation for 2021. Firstly, our backlog scheduling. We ended the first quarter at NOK 1.8 billion of backlog, and by year of execution, we see NOK 600 million in revenues linked to this backlog for the remainder of this year, around NOK 1 billion in 2023, and around NOK 200 million in 2024. Secondly, our operating expenses. As a fast-growing company, we see our costs expanded quarter -on -quarter in 2021. For the first quarter in 2022, we saw that salary and other personnel costs and operating expenses together totaled around NOK 76 million. Excluding salary and personnel costs associated with projects, which we call resource utilization, we expect these costs together to remain around similar levels as we move through 2022. Thirdly, our net cash balance. We continue to benefit from a favorable cash position ending the quarter at NOK 1.5 billion. This was helped by favorable movements in net current operating assets as we progressed with our projects. Through 2022, we continue to expect some of this cash to be used for our projects as they further mature, and outflow of cash is required. Based on project movements alone, we would expect that the year would end at a cash balance slightly below NOK 1 billion. Also, based on project cash flows alone, we would expect this trend to reverse somewhat in 2023. Please note that these comments do not include any assumptions for cash spend on M&A, additional investment opportunities that might arise through the year, or similar events. Now Valborg will summarize our way forward. Thank you, Egil. Nearly two years after the company was established, we are in operation, delivering Brevik CCS in Norway, Twence CCU in the Netherlands, and working on BP's Net Zero Teesside Power in the U.K. We have set ambitious targets and a clear direction to position for the huge market ahead of us. We have prioritized European market and four market segments: cement, bio and waste to energy, gas to power, and blue hydrogen. These remain our focus, and we also see opportunities emerging in North America and in a number of other industry segments where our technology is effective. We cannot meet our ambitions alone, therefore, we have entered into collaboration with a number of complementary partners to accelerate the adoption of CCUS. In the quarter, we have entered into collaboration with Microsoft, Northern Lights, and SINTEF. We see this aspect of growth remaining very active in the years to come. To turn CCUS economics positive, the cost must come further down. We have set a target of up to 50% CapEx reduction within the mid of the decade. There is not one quick fix. We must challenge the cost in many ways. We will continue to work with EPC and license models, but we must also bring the full value chain together, Carbon Capture as a Service. Our customer will simply pay per ton CO2 captured. We believe this will accelerate the market as well as accelerate cost reduction. With strong signals for CCUS market growth, our ambition remains to secure contracts to capture 10 million tons per annum of CO2 by 2025. In these challenging times, given the highly complicated international circumstances, I am proud that Aker Carbon Capture can rely on our dedicated, resilient, and purpose-driven employees. They are all eager to make a difference in our crucial global challenge to mitigate the impact of climate change. This goal is also a huge business driver for CCUS, as confirmed by the UN IPCC. As a pure play carbon capture specialist, we're up for the challenge. We have a firm strategy, our market positioning is progressing as planned, and we are already delivering major projects which will be reference projects in the industry. Our technology, which decarbonizes industry and helps to safeguard energy security, will be an important part of the green transition. We are actively recruiting and building a strong company ready to make a lasting impact. Thank you. Now we move to the Q&A session of our presentation. Egil, will you please join me? Okay. Thank you, Valborg, and thank you, Egil. Thank you also to everyone on the call for getting questions in, nice and early. There's a lot to go through. Some of them are quite long. You know who you are. I may have to summarize your questions to get them through in time, but we'll run to the hour and see what we can do. First up, Erwan from RBC, this is about cost reduction. How are ongoing market conditions changing anything with regards to our 50% CapEx reduction target by mid-decade? Well, let me start, and you can continue, Egil. Yeah. First, I would say that it's very important now with the ongoing projects, Brevik and Twence, that we have placed all purchase orders. This is important to safeguard the delivery of the project. Going forward, we will work on cost reduction in many different ways. We have highlighted earlier modularization and standardization. These, of course, are elements that are independent of the overall numbers, but will contribute to achieve more simplified solutions. We will also work on digitalization in the same way. Of course, we see that the market is changing, and we see effects, for instance, on raw materials. Maybe you can say something about the market effects. We do see effects of raw materials, and this is volatile at the moment. However, I think our efforts, especially related to modularization and standardization, also the Big Catch projects, is showing results in such that we can purchase more standardized equipment and fabricate the equipment in a more cost-efficient way, which should offset the changes that we've seen lately. Okay, one quick follow-up. Mm-hmm. Studies, do we expect to see a growing share of revenues or a growing level of revenues from studies in the future? Well, as you can see from the presentation on our 10 in 2025 slide, we have an increased activity level on studies and tenders. This shows the increase in market activity. I expect this to continue to grow. We believe in an exponential growth in the CCUS market. That is why we are recruiting people to be able to respond to our customer and our prioritized segments and regions. In terms of revenues, as we add new major projects, the percentage of revenues will be a lower share, but the number of studies will increase. Absolutely. Thank you. That's very clear. Next up, Rachel from Morgan Stanley. Norcem. The questions around in the fourth quarter, we talked about, you know, the challenges from decommissioning of the facilities, the COVID issues, et cetera. Could you just remind us again about the delays and possible cost overruns? Mm How we picture this? It has been announced from Norcem, being the overall responsible of all activities in Brevik, that they have seen an increase in cost. Our contract represent 50% of the overall value of Norcem's activities. There are a number of other contractors on the site, and so far the work that has taken place at site in Brevik is modification of existing facilities and a lot of civil work, and this was also areas that Norcem highlighted when it comes to the cost increase. What we have seen is an increase on the fabrication cost, and this represent approximately 10%, but which is covered in our contract. Oh, certainly. That also I think also answers the second part of Rachel's question as well. Mm-hmm. Great. From Steven Irvine, can we talk about the cost increase, when you look at Brevik again, are looking at placing purchase orders. How does that cost increase affect that process? Is it a pass-through? Are we liable for any cost increases? How does that dynamic work? No, we have placed all purchase orders. We also see that there are no delay on the equipment being delivered to Brevik. The first equipment will be delivered in June. The fabrication scope in June is relatively limited. Most will be delivered next year, so we have float in the delivery time. We have firm contracts with our suppliers, and we certainly believe that we came ahead of all this uncertainty in the market. Mm-hmm. Absolutely. Okay, next up, Anders Rosenlund, and a lot of questions on Brevik CCS. Yeah. Very detailed, very well-based. To the extent that we could remind everyone where we stand on this. The budget overruns have been reported. To what extent do these refer to our scope? I think you've said it already, but it'd be good just to say it again. Yeah. As I said, you know, our contract represent 50% of Norcem's overall activity. We've seen overrun in this respect. They have clearly stated from Norcem's side that there are increase on the modification scope. They have had surprises when it comes to civil and groundwork. Mm. From our side, we've had approximately 10% increase. Half of that is related to COVID effects. Mm. This has been covered by Norcem as part of contract mechanisms. Absolutely. Mm. In the scope that's linked to ACC, and the revisions of the budget, how can we describe it? I mean, is it linked to change orders? Is it cost inflation? Are there fixed price elements in there? How, what, how best? Mm Can we describe this? We have a lump sum contract with Norcem. However, there is indexation mechanism, meaning that the values remaining will be adjusted on a yearly basis on an agreed index. Okay. Mm-hmm. I mean, overall, from this whole picture, how do we see the implications for ACC panning out from? Mm Brevik CCS? No, we are on track. I think that is very important to highlight. Mm. It's still early days in the project. We've completed the engineering, we've placed the purchase order, but we haven't started fabrication yet. It will be very good that it's a limited scope this summer because then we can really make sure that we work together as a team, together with Norcem and all the other contractors in Brevik, and really practice and make very detailed plans for the work taking place in 2023. Mm ... which will be very important to secure the schedule of the project. Absolutely. The very last one from Anders, I think I can guess the answer for this one, but whatever happens, if Heidelberg was to, for instance, pull out of the project. Mm What would that mean? I think we all I mean, I can guess the answer is, you should ask them. I think that's certainly an answer for HeidelbergCement, but we know that our customer and HeidelbergCement, as the group, they have a very ambitious CCS strategy. Mm. I think this is a very important project for them. I would say equally important as it is to us. For both of us, it's a reference project for the industry. It's the first carbon capture plant on a big cement plant in the world, and this is a segment where carbon capture and storage is the only solution to decarbonize. All right, great, thank you. Moving on. Turner Holm, two questions. The first one, talking about the increase in studies and tenders. I think really Egil or Valborg you answered this anyway. Mm-hmm. The increase in the studies and tender section versus Q4- Mm was down to a handful of quite important studies. Mm In the waste-to-energy, and also with cement. Yeah. That's been covered already. Mm. Gas prices. How has the high gas price environment affected customer appetite for gas to power and blue hydrogen? I think this is a very good question. We see now that the focus is very much on energy security. Through carbon capture and storage, we can ensure that there is clean energy available. The focus on hydrogen has increased. A lot of focus on green, but also blue, and I certainly believe that blue will pave the way for green. We see that gas-to-power plants is more and more focused around the world, not only in Europe, in U.K., but we also see a lot of focus on that in North America. Okay. Mm. All right. Two quick questions from George Schumer. First one, and maybe one for Egil, I think. How much revenue will you make per ton if CO2 prices meet estimates in the market? Mm. I guess this really refers to Carbon Capture as a Service. Maybe it's worth- Mm Just checking the revenue models again. I think the important message is that we take payment per ton capture. Our units are standardized at 100,000 tons. You see the cost range that we have, EUR 70-EUR 150, depending on the quality of the project and the economics in that project. We have three pricing models that we talk to our clients about. One is a variable price model where we link it to their alternative pricing with a base fee. We have a range price where we have a floor and a roof that we operate within and move variable within that range. Or we can offer a fixed price per ton model. Depending on the pricing model that is preferable for the client, that gives our revenues. Of course, higher carbon pricing, it will give more value to the capture and storage process that we offer as a service. Absolutely. Next one's a very long-term one, looking to 2030. George actually typed earrings. I think he means earnings. Mm. Looking at our earnings base in 2030. This is a very super long-term question, but how do you think we should, we could picture this? You know, we have our 10 in 2025 target. I think that's the start of the exponential growth factor. If we're able to capture our share of the market and also grow into other regions, the revenue potential is significant. We wouldn't comment on the bottom line earnings at this stage, such a long way into the future for CCS. Absolutely. It's a long, long way indeed. Okay, moving on. James Winchester, a bunch of questions here. The $52 billion spend by mid-decade from BNEF, the numbers you referred to in the market- Mm View, how do we see the European market in that slice in that same timeframe? Good question. Maybe I can refer back to you, David. Yeah. Yeah. Well, the European market is a very big slice of that. Mm. The maturity of the CCS wave, if you like, is, as we know, a little bit more advanced in Europe. Mm-hmm. If you look, then, say, North America and Asia, although those other regions are catching up very fast. I'll get back to you with a number on that. You could also look it up on your terminal as well, James. Yeah. It'll be on the survey on there somewhere. It's gonna be a very, very important part of that. Mm And will most likely be weighted towards its favor the shorter term outlook you look at. Second one, U.K. clusters. What's the level of urgency around development in terms of the U.K., the big U.K. clusters, and do we think things are on target for the first storage to be online in 2026? We are, you know, working, focused on the BP Net Zero Teesside Power FEED. BP has an ambitious plan to move forward with the project, so we certainly believe that the plans that has been made for Track-1 will go as planned. Of course, there is always uncertainty here. It comes to political support and so on, but there is no doubt that the operator, BP, and also we saw SSE and Equinor submitted their proposals for Peterhead and Keadby 3. This competition, the companies really wanna move forward, and there is a strong political will in U.K. to have clean energy. Absolutely. Mm. Last question from James, I think one for Egil. Working capital, could you just remind us of the outlook of how that might trend in 2022 for us? Yeah. I think the easiest way to look at it is to look at our cash position. We're now standing at NOK 1.5 billion, and we will see outflow of cash through the year closing into NOK 1 billion or slightly below NOK 1 billion at the end of 2022, and that will reverse somewhat in 2023 as we get new cash flows in on the same projects. But this is isolated on the projects that we have in our backlog today, and it's not including any M&A efforts or new investment opportunities that might arise through the year. Okay. Right, the last group of questions are from James Carmichael. Profit recognition for Brevik and Twence, when should we expect these to come? Mm. I think the important element for us on these projects is that they are first of a kind projects, and they are large projects, so the important thing for us is to recognize profit when you can reliably estimate the outcome of these projects. Valborg mentioned that there will be early fabrication work this summer. That will tell us a lot. This year is likely, but we have to do an assessment every quarter whether or not it's the right time to start recognizing on these projects. Okay. Thank you. Next, life cycle emissions, and very much going back to Valborg's ESG slide. Mm. When do we think we'll be able to disclose the full life cycle emissions of our technology? Well, I can't give you a specific date for that. I think it's important that we are open in all our reporting transparency. You will find a lot of information in our annual report, where we now explain much more details of the full value chain and also our services, but I can't give you an exact date for this. Okay. Last question. Talking about storage infrastructure, the timing around that, and also looking at what that means in terms of future contract awards, is it realistic to expect any further firm contract wins this year? This is not just the U.K., this is anywhere. Well, we work with FEED contracts, we work with tenders and so on. We see high market activity. Mm-hmm. Of course, we believe in the market. What we've seen so far is that there needs to be the full value chain demonstrated, whether on Brevik, where it's CCS, or on Twence, where it's CCU. We are working closely with a number of customers who wants to move forward, but we cannot be precise in any guidance of specific projects. Okay, fine. Mm-hmm. There is actually one more question that popped up. Mm-hmm. Kate O'Sullivan: Is there a volume threshold for which we'll disclose specific FEED studies? Also, do we have any sort of resourcing limits around the number of large studies that we can run in parallel? Yeah, that's a good question, and I think this comes back to, you know, our growth strategy. We are recruiting, and we are continuously recruiting. Today, we have more than 250 people on our projects, our FEED studies, and so on. However, we need partners. We cannot do this alone, and that is why it's so important for us, with all the strategic collaboration we enter into, whether it's MOUs or strategic partnerships. That is why we highlight that in every quarterly presentation, but of course, it's an important part of our strategy and the only way really to respond to this market growth. Absolutely. In terms of the threshold, I mean, sometimes we should, we shouldn't forget that customers, especially in your early discussions. Mm-hmm Customers have a very high level of confidentiality. Mm-hmm. Quite often, they prefer that we don't mention- Absolutely the studies by name. Yeah. Absolutely. Okay. Mm-hmm. That is the last question. Mm-hmm. Yeah. Mm-hmm. Any last words, Valborg? Now, thank you all for listening in, and we'll meet again next quarter. We will hopefully have some exciting news for you then, and we're looking forward to the dialogue with you, and you always have Mr. David Phillips. You can call him and set up meetings. We're open for discussions with you.