Good afternoon, and welcome to the presentation for Aker Carbon Capture's results for the first quarter of 2023. My name is David Phillips, Head of the U.K. and Investor Relations, and I'm joined today by my colleague Egil Fagerland, our CFO. For information, reflecting some feedback from the market, we are now taking a more focused approach with Q1 and Q3 reporting. We will have a shorter presentation with Egil alone, then we will have plenty of time for Q&A with the audience as usual. Firstly, Egil will take us through our main achievements and developments from the first quarter of this year, and we'll also run through a number of topics that are important to our strategy. He will take us through our key Q1 financials, including some outlook commentary for the rest of this year. Finally, we will take your Q&A via the online system. Just as a reminder, as in previous quarters, you can post your questions into the system at any time, and at the end, we will try and work through as many of them as time allows. Egil, over to you. Thank you, David. This is the agenda for our presentation today, following an active and interesting quarter. We will address the highlights of the quarter, our operations and business development, our delivery models, the financial highlights, and finally, our way forward. Then we will move on to Q&A. Before I start with the highlights from Q1, we have a short introduction to the company. Aker Carbon Capture is a pure play carbon capture company with the strength of the Aker group behind it. Our proprietary patented technology has been developed over 20 years and is validated through close to 60,000 operating hours and verified across several applications. Aker Carbon Capture's technology is cost and energy efficient, robust, and flexible, meaning it can be applied to existing plants or new builds. The process uses a biodegradable mixture of water and organic amine solvents to absorb the CO2 and has a market-leading HSE profile. Since mid-2020, Aker Carbon Capture has focused on the European market with Scandinavia, Benelux, and U.K. leading the way. We also note the increased policy support and early-stage corporate activity around CCUS markets in North America, where we now have our first local employee. We continue to prioritize four market segments where our technology has been tested and verified: cement, bio and waste-to-energy, gas-to-power, and blue hydrogen. We're also seeing good engagement with a number of additional segments where our technology is well-suited to capture CO2, such as refining and process industries. Now to the highlights of the quarter. We've seen good progress on our projects in the period. For Brevik CCS, the world's first carbon capture plant on a cement facility, more key equipment has been delivered and installed. Twence CCU, a modular carbon capture plant on a waste-to-energy facility, we received and installed the modular Just Catch containers within the same day. In addition, two of our U.K. flagship projects, BP's Net Zero Teesside Power and Viridor's Runcorn CCS, have proceeded to final negotiations for government support. When we look at new potential work, we've signed a letter of intent for the delivery of two modular Just Catch units. This was also mentioned at our fourth quarter presentation. We've signed a new mobile test unit campaign, which will take place at Fortum's Waste Solutions facility in Denmark. We've been awarded a pre-FEED for a European utility customer and several other studies across different countries and industries. During the quarter, our proprietary capture technology has shown to be highly effective for the smelting industry. We strengthened our collaboration with Carbfix, one of our key partners for CO2 storage. We look at our financial results, I'm happy to share that we've continued to see revenue growth in the first quarter, nearly doubling our top line compared to the same period last year. Overall revenue for the first quarter was NOK 287 million. We've strengthened our cash position to reach NOK 1.3 billion. I'm proud to announce that we've accelerated our market activity in the first quarter of 2023. The U.K. government selected BP's Net Zero Teesside Power and Viridor's Runcorn CCS as successful bidders in the Track-1 CCUS clustering process. We've been awarded a mobile test unit campaign and a feasibility study for Fortum in Denmark. Fortum's waste incineration plant in Nyborg specializes in safe destruction of hazardous waste and turning it into energy. The planned capture capacity for that plant will be around 170,000 tons of CO2 per year. Early in the quarter, we signed a letter of intent for the delivery of two Just Catch units for a large carbon capture project with a planned capture capacity of 200,000 tons per year. The concept with two Just Catch in parallel demonstrates the cost and schedule attractiveness of this standardized modular offering. We also saw several pre-FEEDs and studies awarded in the quarter. We won an important pre-FEED with an undisclosed European power utility customer, and we secured several studies across industries such as waste-to-energy and smelting. On the research and development side of the business, we also made achievements. Through our mobile test unit campaign for CO2 HUB Nord and Elkem, Aker Carbon Capture's proprietary technology has shown to be very effective on flue gases from smelters. We launched the 3rd generation Just Catch, which includes improved energy efficiency, smaller footprint, and fewer modules. We completed an R&D project for high-pressure CO2 separation using membranes. Finally, we extended our partnership with Carbfix aimed at combining the company's complementary technologies to offer the full carbon capture and storage value chain. We aim to work together on point source capture and point source storage for volumes between 100,000 tons of CO2 per year and 1 million tons of CO2 per year, especially from the hard-to-abate industries such as cement, gas to power, and waste to energy in both Europe and North America. We move on to look in more detail at our operations and business development. In the Netherlands, at Twence's waste-to-energy plant in Hengelo, we are delivering solid progress. Key equipment has been delivered from our suppliers throughout the past quarter. All three columns and the Just Catch containers have now been installed, which are both major milestones. Aker Carbon Capture is delivering a standardized Just Catch, which will be delivered by the end of this year. The Just Catch concept is a modular and configurable offering that enables efficient production and deployment of carbon capture units. To give you an example of this efficient installation process, recently, the container modules were transported through the gates at Twence's facilities at 9:00 A.M. in the morning and installed within the same day. You can actually see the containers being lifted in place on the image on this slide. The following week, the installation team had already hooked up platforms, support steels, and had started connecting piping. This strengthens Aker Carbon Capture's position as a leading provider of cost and time-efficient solutions for mid-scale and large-scale emitters that are looking at carbon capture to decarbonize their business. The Just Catch units can be operational within two years. The Twence's CCU project will reduce CO2 emissions associated with the generation of energy from the incineration of non-recyclable waste. The captured CO2 will be used as fertilizer in greenhouses, a unique example of circular economy. Also at Brevik CCS, we're making solid progress. All the waste heat recovery units and the internals of the direct contact cooler have been installed, and all the columns and CO2 storage tanks have arrived on-site. The installation work will gradually accelerate during 2023 as more equipment arrives. When complete, the plant will be ready to capture 400,000 tons of CO2 per year. The Brevik CCS project is part of Longship, a full CCS value chain development and the largest ever climate project in Norwegian industry. The cement industry represents 6% to 7% of global CO2 emissions, and CCS is a key solution to decarbonize this hard-to-abate segment. Through Brevik CCS, we help to create local employment and establish strong partnerships with local companies and other stakeholders. This delivery model is scalable also for other carbon capture projects. In March, the U.K. carbon capture market took some important steps forward with the confirmation of which projects will proceed to final negotiations for Track-1 government funding, plus the potential for further projects to move forward under Track-1 in an expansion round and a Track-2 process. Aker Carbon Capture is the carbon capture provider for a FEED for BP's Net Zero Teesside Power and the FEED for SSE Keadby 3 and the pre-FEED for Viridor's Runcorn CCS, all potential mega-scale carbon capture projects. Both BP's and Viridor's projects have now proceeded to final negotiations for Track-1 funding. Together with Viridor, the U.K.'s largest waste to energy company, we are delivering a pre-FEED study for the Runcorn CCS project, which aims to capture around 1 million tons of CO2 per year. This is an important step forward for the delivery of our license and key equipment offering for mega-scale carbon capture plants, where for both the BP and SSE Thermal projects, we are the carbon capture partner to a consortium of Aker Solutions, Siemens Energy, and Altrad Babcock. Looking at SSE Thermal Keadby 3. The U.K. government will launch a process later this year to enable further expansion of the Track-1 clusters beyond the initial eight projects announced. This aims to identify and select projects to join the HyNet and East Coast Cluster, including The Humber, where Keadby 3 is located, and their associated storage facilities as they become viable with a clear aim to be operational by latest 2030. This wider deployment of CCUS will help the U.K. achieve its decarbonization targets, create jobs, and bolster energy security. The U.K. has an ambitious decarbonization strategy and aims to capture 20-30 million tons of CO2 by 2030, supported by a GBP 20 billion of CCUS infrastructure funding. We've set an ambitious target to secure contracts to capture 10 million tons of CO2 by the end of 2025. We call it our 10 in 25 target. As before, in order to better reflect our activity status, we visualize this progress across four categories: secured development contracts, secured FEED contracts, and tenders for development contracts, pre-FEEDs, studies, and MTU campaigns, and finally, our prospects. Here, the 0.5 million tons represent the already secured contracts with Heidelberg Materials and Twence. The tenders and FEEDs now stand at 7.4 million tons. This reflect Net Zero Teesside Power and still Keadby 3. The category also include ongoing tender activity for development contracts. The category is lower than last time we reported when the figure reflected peak tender activity in the U.K. ahead of the government funding decision. One tender related to the refining industry in the U.K. has dropped out of this list. The project in question did not move forward with the U.K. government funding negotiations. In the quarter, we have seen continued growth in the pre-FEED studies and mobile test unit campaigns category, and this now totals 14.6 million tons. I will take you through our delivery models and then financials. We have two main product lines, Just Catch and Big Catch. The container and skid-based Just Catch is a modular and configurable carbon capture plant. It comes with a standard capacity of 40,000 and 100,000 tons. However, several Just Catch modules can also be installed in parallel trains and allow a higher capture capacity, up to 300,000 tons of CO2 per year. This quarter, we launched our third generation Just Catch, which comes with improved energy efficiency and an even smaller footprint and fewer modules. We have also taken steps to further modularize our 400,000 ton plant design. We deliver the Just Catch on an EPC basis, or to be more accurate, due to the high level of standardization under a Just Catch supply agreement. Since the Just Catch is a standardized modularized product where we pre-fabricate the modules with a limited customized scope, its delivery carries lower risk and potentially higher long-term margins than typical EPC projects. Just Catch is also the key to our Carbon Capture as a Service offering, where our customers simply pay per ton captured. The standardized nature of the units make them attractive investment objects for separate yield companies and infrastructure investors who can purchase the units on supply agreements from Aker Carbon Capture and lease them back to us or to the emitter for a stable return. The model also allow us to provide and operate the Just Catch for the emitters, boosting our long-term aftermarket revenues. Our Big Catch offering is focused on capture capacities beyond 400,000 tons of CO2 per year and up to several million tons of CO2 per year. Right now, we're delivering Brevik CCS on an EPC basis. In the future, we will prefer to offer Big Catch plants as license and key equipment packages. This is in line with our contracting model for the UK projects discussed earlier, where we can be the carbon capture provider directly to the end customer or work with the designated EPC contractor. As a rough guidance, you could expect the license and key equipment contract size to be in the range around 1/3 of a full EPC delivery, but with a higher long-term margin potential. The Just Catch Offshore is a modular design specialized for offshore gas turbines on FPSO vessels and platforms. Today, the Big Catch offering dominates our revenues, which is natural given the ongoing Brevik CCS project being one of the two major projects in the construction phase in our portfolio. Over time, we believe that the total revenues from Just Catch supply agreements can become as large or even larger than the Big Catch offerings. As a final reminder, we do offer aftermarket services, solvent management, and solvent supply to all our clients across the offerings. Aftermarket revenue streams are expected to pick up over time, in line with us growing the install base of Just Catch and Big Catch capture units. We've shared quarterly updates for the estimated levelized cost of the full value chain Carbon Capture as a Service offering since the third quarter of 2021. The overall range for Europe remains unchanged since the last quarter and stands at EUR 75-EUR 175 per ton. For the U.S., we expect to see a similar range for the CapEx and OpEx elements. However, the cost for transportation and storage are expected to be significantly lower due to CO2 transportation via pipelines, often supported by shorter distances between the capture site and the permanent storage site. Let's compare with current carbon prices. The EUA or the EU ETS now stands at around EUR 90 per ton and has recently been trading between EUR 85 and EUR 95. The long-term outlook for the EUA continues to be sound, with analyst price forecasts for 2030 in the range of EUR 80-EUR 165 per ton. Also matches the required range for IEA's various energy outlook scenarios. In the U.S. with the Inflation Reduction Act, the 45Q tax credits stand at $85 per ton CO2 sequestered. I will now take you through the key financial highlights of the quarter before we move on to summary and Q&A. Bear in mind that all numbers that are mentioned are in Norwegian kroner. Let's start with the income statement. Overall revenue for the first quarter was NOK 287 million, which is up 99% compared to the same period last year. The revenue growth is mainly driven by Brevik CCS and Twence CCU. The UK FEEDs with BP Net Zero Teesside Power and SSE Keadby 3 also contributed to revenues in the period. Finally, the pre-FEED for Viridor and the MTU campaign with Elkem drove revenue in the quarter. Our reported first quarter EBITDA was - NOK 51 million, which was NOK 9 million better than the same period last year. Both the Brevik CCS and Twence CCU projects are recognizing profit and are expected to continue to deliver positive results through the year. We also saw positive contribution from the ongoing FEEDs, pre-FEEDs and studies. The overall negative EBITDA continued to be driven by high sales and tender activity, as well as R&D projects. The efforts that we currently invest in our business will have significant future value, and some qualify for capitalization, which we can see as fixed and intangible assets in our balance sheet. For the balance sheet, our first quarter net current operating assets ended negative NOK 666 million, which represents a continued cash positive position on our key pro-projects. Overall operating assets and liabilities or net capital employed, which includes fixed and intangible assets, was negative NOK 515 million. This shows that both our short-term and long-term business activities are currently funded by our net working capital position. We continue to have a very healthy cash position at NOK 1.3 billion, which could cover all of our liabilities 1.9 times. Finally, our equity remains strong at NOK 0.8 billion. We started the quarter with NOK 1,093 million in cash and cash equivalents. Through the quarter, we saw an overall cash inflow of NOK 256 million. The main driver was project milestone payments on the key projects, and this represented NOK 331 million in net current operating asset inflow. We had a loss before tax of NOK 49 million and the CapEx of NOK 34 million, and the CapEx mainly related to product development and the construction of a second mobile test unit. In total, cash and cash equivalents ended the quarter at NOK 1,348 million. These were the highlights of our historical financials, and now let's have a look at the year ahead. Regarding our financial outlook, these remain broadly in line with the outlook we presented the previous quarter. Our backlog ended the first quarter at around NOK 1 billion, and by year of execution, we see this work roughly at NOK 800 million for the rest of 2023 and around NOK 200 million for 2024. Please note that the letter of intent for two new Just Catch units that was announced on the 3rd of January, 2023 is not included in this backlog phasing. We will only include such order intake once a firm contract has been announced. The total salary, personnel, and operating expenses ended the quarter at NOK 77 million. Excluding costs associated with projects, we expect to see operating expenses around similar level in the next six months with significant flexibility. We continue to show a strong liquidity position ending the quarter with a net cash position of NOK 1.3 billion. Going forward, we expect the current cash position to gradually trend down through the rest of the year as project working capital is consumed. Please note that these comments do not include any assumptions for cash spend on M&A or additional investment opportunities that might arise going forward. Let me share with you a short summary on our way forward. We've set a clear direction to position for the huge market ahead of us. We've prioritized the European market and four market segments: cement, bio and waste to energy, gas to power, and blue hydrogen. We see opportunities emerging in North America and in other industry segments such as refining and process industries. Our proven technology is market leading, and we will further improve energy efficiency and capture rate and increase our focus on new technologies. Through standardization, modularization, and digitalization, we're expanding our cost-efficient product portfolio. Collaboration with strategic suppliers is an important part of this journey. We will continue to offer EPC or that is Just Catch supply agreements and license models with key equipment for Big Catch, followed by long-term service and solvent management and solvent supply agreements. We are also bringing the full CCUS value chain together through Carbon Capture as a Service. To meet the expected growth in the market, we'll continue to build strong partnerships. Finally, we're building our company through committed people thriving in a collaborative and innovative environment. We're in a strong position to make a positive impact on our planet and continue to cr eate a sustainable future. Thank you. Now we move to the Q&A section. Okay, thank you everyone, thank you Egil, for your presentation as well. We now move into the Q&A section, as Egil just said. This is as usual, running off the screen as you can hopefully all see. Please do feel free to add questions at any time, we will try and get through as many as time allows. First up, a high level question around project pipeline, in terms of what is not considered as backlog for 2023 and 2024. On our progress in 10 and 25 slide, the one that we, as you've seen for some quarters, is broken down into real contracts and FEEDs and tenders, and studies and pre-FEEDs and so on. The only piece that we count as backlog from that is the very far left darkest color, which is the 0.5 million tons per year of CO2 capacity, which relates to the two projects we're building, Brevik and Twence. Everything else is in the yet to come group, just to make that clarification. Moving on. Moving now to the pipeline. Talking about looking at the pipeline, we've seen an increase in studies and tenders, but we have seen a decrease in terms of the secured FEEDs. Can we talk a little bit about this and what's behind this? Maybe if I take this first, Egil, and you can jump in if you want to say something else. With this, the main... The increase in studies and tenders is very much reflecting the ongoing momentum we've seen. We've seen good activity in a number of the sectors that we have on our target list, including waste of energy and so on. That is very much, I would say, business as usual, and it reflects the growing market we continue to see in this world, and it's very much a European comment at the moment as well. Our excitement over the pond will be is yet to come. The movement in terms of the FEEDs. When we reported this with our Q4 results, that reflected a peak level of tendering in the UK especially, ahead of the government funding decisions that came through in late March. There was one of the projects in that list, went with a different technology provider, although we would also point out that project itself did not receive funding. It wasn't on the list of eight that were chosen to go ahead. Anything else apart from that, you'd have to go and look at that project itself, but that's the reason that moved down, from eight to seven. Maybe I can add, David, that we are also growing the rest of that pipeline, especially within pre-FEED studies and MTU campaigns. That pipeline is important to continue to grow and build the FEED and tenders overview. Over the next 12-18 months, we're hoping to see more of the tenders and FEEDs mature into real construction contracts. Some of them will come our way, some of them will go to others or move out in time. When it comes to the pre-FEED studies and MTU campaigns, we expect more of those now over the next 12 months to move into the FEED and tenders bucket. We're constantly filling in that pipeline and we will see them convert now going forward. Okay, good. Next question, again asking about the tenders and FEEDs. I think we've covered this one already, but also a little bit more about timeline, converting FEEDs into backlog. Egil, as you mentioned already, we hope to see the ones that are, you know, let's say nearer on the radar screen the next 12 to 18 months. I think if you look at the U.K., as you've, you'll have seen the lot of news from U.K., 20 billion GBP of funding, also the selection of eight projects for Track-1 and then the expansion for Track-1, and also Track-2. More news on that over the, you know, over the coming year or two. I think, the, there's a bit of a known unknown around the financing timings for this, and when these projects will ultimately move forward. Certainly the expectation is that, you know, later this year, early next year, let's say in the next 12 months, we would hope to see those in the U.K. to move forward. Okay, next up, a question around capture the Service. Egil, maybe you want to discuss this one? Yeah. The question is, what our traction is on that offering and how we foresee that business model compared to the other business models in the future. At the moment, what we're seeing is a very strong interest in discussing the various offerings that we have in terms of Big Catch or Just Catch, and especially our modularized Just Catch offering. When talking about that modularized offering, we both talk about supply agreements, selling the facility to the client, them owning it, and also, Carbon Capture as a Service where we can provide and help them with the whole value chain, including the financing. The main hurdle for implementing CCAS right now is two things. It's the fact that we don't have storage capacity available as of yet in Europe. That's a hurdle that needs to be in place or overcome before we can offer the full value chain. I think once that is solved, we're gonna see projects come online in Norway, Denmark, and the U.K. and also Netherlands in terms of storage now over the coming two years. We also see that in the meantime, various governments are funding projects and this funding often favors the CapEx model, basically where the client buys the whole facility and have a aftermarket and operations agreement. Also in terms of the next follow-on question from this is roughly can we give any indication as to the share of Capture as a Service versus licensing key equipment, EPC and so on in our pipeline? Over time, in the long term, we foresee that selling Just Catch units, or various sizes and also in trains, meaning selling several units in parallel, that business line can be as large as the licensing with key equipment business line for larger scale projects in terms of revenues. In terms of whether or not you sell the Just Catch as a service or for the client to own it, and then we have an aftermarket agreement, that's a bit more up in the air in terms of discussions with the clients. With most of the clients, we explore both options as a part of our studies and also as a part of their approach to how they can implement CCS. We are supportive of both models, and we do think that quite a fair share of the Just Catch sales in the future will be on the Carbon Capture as a Service business model. Okay, good. Next question. Again, on the tenders and FEEDs question, Q1 versus Q4 last year, I think we've covered that already. The letters of intent that were signed in, we talked about, signed in early Q1, any comments we can say about timing of those converting into real awards? We can't comment specifically on the data we expect them to be converted, but similar to the other pieces of the pipeline that we have shared with you within the 12 to 18 next months is very likely, and when you have an LOI in place, within the next 12 months is likely. Okay. Question around the membrane R&D project that we mentioned in the presentation today. What are the next steps? Also, a reminder of our annual R&D budget. Just around the membrane itself, I mean, we have, although we may not have talked about too much of this openly, we have a fairly broad spectrum of experience we gained over the last 10, 15, 20 years, not just around our favorite amines. This particular project is one that's been going on for a while. It's actually an offshore use to separate high-pressure CO2, Sub- C. This is actually a rather specific niche opportunity. What we learn from this, from our perspective, is very much more about membranes, making some good connections with others in the membrane, let's say the membrane science world, that we could develop further in the future to see how this technology could help us. I guess the point of mentioning this really is to say that we are very, very aware of this area of technology. This is a particular example what we, of what we've been working on. R&D budgets, Egil. What we're looking for going forward is on the CapEx side, we're spending quite a bit on product development, and we're building a new mobile test unit. You can expect the spend to be around the similar levels that you've seen this quarter for this half year. For the second half of this year, you can expect them to slightly go down as the mobile test unit that we're building is finalized. On the R&D spend, we also have R&D spend in our P&L, early phase R&D and technology, exploring, where we are too immature to capitalize, but still developing new technologies. That is represented in the cost base that you see for our EBITDA. The last question in this group, looking at the prolonged, thinking about the bigger picture, prolonged periods for negotiating around the U.K. projects, no real acceleration with the speeds of awards and storage availability in the EU, how do we remain comfortable with our 10 in 25 target? When you look at our pipeline, and you see that we have more than 7 million tons of CO2 in tender and FEED phase, that is likely to convert into real projects within the next 12 to 18 months, we believe that we are well-positioned for a large portion of that bucket. In addition to even larger bucket in the pre-FEED studies and MTU campaigns, we see that it is still likely that the 10 in 25 is very possible, especially when you take into consideration that many of the major projects that will move forward in the second half of 2024 and even more in 2025. Absolutely. Thank you. Okay, moving on. Looking at to the U.K. again and thinking around, how long would the FEED process at Runcorn take, and will it FID on the same timeframe as those others already moving through FEED? I think, this is a very good question. If you look at these projects, like many, in the same country, you normally have to start at where the storage project will be kicking off. What you work back from that. Given all that, we would assume that all these in the first wave will be moving through at roughly the same sort of time. As we said, that is, it depends. It's the known unknown in terms of when this finally happens in the U.K., and when the negotiations are finalized, how long does it take for the company to then do their own FID finally before they move ahead. That feels like later this year and into early 2024. As you said, very roughly the next 12 months should be around them. Follow-up question here, again, LOIs. I think we've already covered this one in terms of the timing for the LOIs awards. Moving on, the next question is looking at the North American market. Can we talk a little bit more about the potential there, delivery models, and partnerships? Very interesting area for us, as you spotted in the comments that Egil made earlier. As you remember, we talked about at our Q4 results. We have our key first employee in Houston, who's a extremely busy guy chasing opportunities and discussions left, right, and center. It is taking a step back. It is a very exciting market, particularly looking at the U.S., but it is 48 separate areas to look at. It's not just one country. It's a little bit earlier in terms of developing how the whole value chain and business models will work than we've seen in Europe. The opportunity, though, is that the arguably some aspects of policy could be easier to work through, particularly from the financing angle, given you have a floor in terms of the famous $85 for 45Q. It is, as always, very large. Even if you look at all of the U.S. footprint for CO2, which is roughly 5 billion tons of CO2 a year, you go down to the industries that are of relevance, things like energy, point source industrial emissions, that's about half, let's say 2.5 billion tons a year. You think, well, a big chunk of that's gonna be in the wrong place. It's gonna be too far from storage. We'll need too much at this point of an expensive pipeline solution to move the CO2 around. Even then, you're still left with a market opportunity that is sizable, even when you work out all those sort of areas that may not come through in the first few waves. Also from our perspective, there are a number of industries that could be potentially exciting in the U.S. where we have a lot of experience, a lot of technology validation, and actual experience of building the plants right now. From that point of view, we see a great opportunity there. I think for us, the key is gonna be really working out what models we use to work over there, how we work with partners, because we've always said this is an area that's gonna be key in terms of being driven by partnerships. We're not just looking for the first contract, we're looking for a base from which we can really scale the business over the next five, 10 years and more. Egil, anything to add in that space at all? I think it's, well covered, David. Okay. Fine. Thank you. Okay, our next one, are we able to provide any guidance on CapEx for 2023? We briefly touched it in another question, but we're probably gonna stay around the similar run rate as you see today. You can expect the fixed asset portion of the CapEx to reduce towards the second half of this year as the second or the new mobile test unit is finalized. On the intangible asset side, I think you can expect to see a similar level going forward. Okay. All right. Moving on. We've already talked a little bit about the U.S. market, we've mentioned that one. I think, maybe I'll just have one additional comment around this. I think the bearing in mind the stage that the market is at over there, whether it ultimately accelerates past Europe, in the next five years or whatever the timeframe is one question. Right now, as I mentioned, it is early. Right now, a lot of it is about positioning and working out how best this value chain works. We certainly found it an extremely rewarding experience to work over there. It's an enormous opportunity and a great lot of very productive and positive discussions going on. We will, of course, when we have some real news to update you with, we will update you with some real news. Also, you talked about another question about membranes. Just, this membranes is the reason, again, the reason we mentioned this is to really show that we do have quite a broad technology base, even though we may not have rolled all of it out commercially. We understand this technology very well. This, this specific one we talked about is a niche opportunity looking at subsea separation from high-pressure well streams. This is, I would say more looking at the physical durability and chemical durability of the actual membrane itself. As we've always said, remember the slide we had at Q4, breaking down the market across everything in carbon capture into, you know, fermentation, CO2, pre-combustion, post-combustion, and so on. This is important to note whenever you think about something like membranes, there is a different technology and often, certainly historically, has had a different target. It celebrates its separating high-pressure CO2, where the ambition perhaps is not to capture 90% or 95%. It's to reduce it by maybe 70%. It's a different style of target. It's a very interesting area overall, and we are certainly keeping ourselves very aware of how this market might develop. Next question. Thinking about our growth and everything else, how do we plan to maintain our financial robustness while investing in product innovation and technology and so on? How do we balance our financial resources with staying competitive in a growing market? What we've done on the liquidity side is that we've made sure that all of our projects are cash positive throughout the execution. We aim at cash neutral, but that means in reality that we get cash in before we pay our vendors. In that sense, our projects are very robust in terms of being able to cover their liabilities at any time. When it comes to being able to grow at the right speed and do the right technology development, we did raise capital sometime back, and part of the purpose for that, the capital raise was to ensure that the business we have is well-equipped to deliver on our 10 in 25 strategy. As you can see from our figures, we are also investing quite a lot in product development and technology and innovation on a quarterly basis. Okay, moving on. Also around the financial side, this is a question we often get asked all the time and our answer is nearly always the same. The question is, when do we expect to reach break even? We have never given any guidance on this, but I think you have to bear in mind that firstly, as Egil said, we have a very good financial support, both from a high level as being part of a larger organization and also immediately with us in terms of our balance sheet and everything else. I think, given that, you know, our priorities really are to secure growth in the industry and make sure we can really scale, and make the most of the opportunity that's in front of us. Given that, we have not given any exact comments around breaking even. I think to follow on on that, David, you know, we don't wanna do that because there are so many growth opportunities in this market that you have to decompose it almost by the country or the opportunity to see whether or not it makes sense. And taking advantage of opportunities in North America, for example, also costs additional funds to grow. Becoming profitable, we should look at market by market and project by project, and we can say that all our projects are profitable. And that's our starting point when we do business. The costs that we have are mainly related to sales, tendering, and technology development. And of course, some staff functions like myself and David Phillips here. That's the smaller part of that cost that we are incurring on a running basis. Absolutely. Given the good support we have, effectively you could say you may even get a false positive or negative if we were to say we're breaking even earlier or later because really we want to be positioning ourselves for growth in future years, not just aiming for a very short-term financial target. Moving on, back to the U.S. again. A very good question around what's the best way to crack this U.S. market, particularly as a smaller Norwegian player, and how do we participate? Shall I take this first? Yeah. I mean, I think we talked a little bit broadly about the U.S. and our approach in talking to various partners and so on. I think, key to this is firstly making sure that we have a very good understanding of the, of the local value chain, of partners, also of understanding how the actual business model works over there because there's no question it'll be different from what it is in Europe. There'll be certain aspects that maybe are, have a different emphasis on certain aspects of technology. There may be a different emphasis in terms of certain industries. I think that the key way for us... I think, I must admit, we spend a quite a lot of time in the U.S. already as we've been talking about for the last year, having many good discussions with potential partners across the value chain and also investors, and are very, very privileged to have a very good following in the U.S. as well. Even given, as you said, we're a small cap Norwegian player. In this, I think the awareness in the industry of our technology is quite strong. I think that the challenge is making sure we link up with the right piece of the value chain to really deliver the projects in a sustainable, on budget, credible way. The pieces of the value chain, as I mentioned, will likely be different in the U.S. versus Europe and probably even different in different parts of the U.S., whether you're looking at working with a developer around one industry, whether you're working with an actual customer, an emitter in other states. I think there'll be quite some differences there. We have to keep a very open mind, keep ourselves be very flexible, and also have to be prepared to take some views when, as and when the time comes. To add some more flavor to it as well, we will try to replicate some of the success we've seen by having a focused and targeted strategy in Northern Europe. We've been quite good at prioritizing where do we start to grow? Where are the best conditions for us to enter? When you look at the North American market, it's vast. It's larger in totality than the European market. The way we focused around Scandinavia, Benelux, and the U.K. and Europe has been a success for us to be able to grow. We will have to do a similar approach in North America. Picking out those spots that are gonna come first with the best support and the best conditions for growing is what we're working on right now. In addition, we will have to leverage our partnership approach, which we've been successful with in Europe so far. We also have some global partners that we will continue to work with also in the North American context, including Microsoft and Siemens Energy. Okay, moving on. This is a question around revenue timing and thinking more from a Big Catch project. What is the lead time from firming up a contract in terms of announcing it to actually recognizing meaningful revenues? Yeah. When we work on a Big Catch project, and typically for us that would be a license with key equipment contract, we would start typically all the way back in the study phase. After a study, they could consider a mobile test unit or not, that depends a little bit on the case. That typically takes half a year to one year. Once you've done that, they can move into a FEED phase. A FEED can take anything from six months to one year. Some prefer to have a pre-FEED and a bit shorter FEED, and some do a larger FEED, and that takes a bit longer. Once you've done a FEED, that typically also entails a combined tender or ends with a tender price. You can win the EPC contract or the license and key equipment contract. For Aker Carbon Capture, we will typically then deliver the technology and the key equipment associated with that. The building of a plant can typically be around three years. You have the lead time up to the contract, and through the building of this facility, Aker Carbon Capture will incur license fees and key equipment revenues. We typically recognize revenues from the start and profit once the project is mature enough to credibly foresee its end state or its financial outcome. As a rule of thumb in EPC industries, that's been around 20%. This is a newer, less mature industry, so maybe at the slightly higher percentage of completion before we start recognizing profits. Okay. just with a similar theme, looking more into 2024, the question is, the market seems to be a little bit nervous about revenue development in 2024. When must contracts be in place to avoid our revenues dropping year-on-year? With the secured backlog in 2023 of NOK 800 million and NOK 200 million in 2024, it's very clear that in 2024 we need to have some new contracts to continue to keep the revenue level we're at now. That would be in the first half of 2024. Yeah. pretty quick reaction to any contract awards, absolutely. Yeah. First half 2024. Okay, we covered the next one already. Question, looking at the quarterly result itself, why is the EBITDA down despite revenue increases, given what's been happening in the background? Does it imply that R&D spending and tendering are increasing much more? If so, how comfortable are we to cover our spending without from our current funding without needing to raise any capital? What we're showing in this quarter is according to our plans, and the revenue's increasing, that is also the projects progressing well. At the same time, we do see increased market activity. You see that both from our tendering pipeline, it has been growing over the last period, and typically these tenders can last from a couple of months to half a year. Some of this cost definitely links to sales and tendering. Also, on the R&D side and early innovation, we're spending capital. That's according to the plan that we've had to deliver on our 10 in 25 ambition. Okay. Great. Next one is a more detailed one, around costs, and is around looking at the energy cost for our SSE work, Keadby 3. We're not gonna be commenting on a particular plant. What I would say though, maybe if you've seen this already, we had this technology day earlier in this year in January, the full recording is on YouTube. If you look for Aker Carbon Capture Technology Day 2023, something like that, you will find it and go through that, and there'll be some nice slides in some parts of that that talk particularly around how we see opportunities to reduce the energy consumption, to really bring that net energy cost down, both from internal and external heat recovery. I mean, I think we'll leave it at that because we're not going to be talking about any project in any detail. Any to add, Egil? I think that's fine. No. You can also find this information on the recording that we have also on the webpage. Yes ... not only YouTube. Good point. You can find it on our homepage. Yeah. Thank you. The very last one we sort of, covered already, I think, how soon do we need to get one of the large contracts to generate revenues in 2024? As you said, first half 2024, there's a lot of homework done before these contracts typically move- Yeah ... to the actual final award. Yeah. I would say within the next 12 to 18 months, certainly, you know, a new award is needed to have the same, to continue to recognize revenues in 2024, on new contracts. Yeah. Okay. All right. Those are all the questions that have come in so far. I think we will draw a line there. I think what remains is for us to thank you for your interest and good questions, as always. For those who don't have time, I know it's a busy time of year with Q1 reporting, but please, if you run out of time and haven't got time to follow up, then please do drop us a line and get in contact, and we can always run through more topics then. Thanks for your time again, and we will speak to you in the next few months.