Good morning, everyone. Hope you're in the room and online. Thank you very much for joining us this morning in connection with the release and the presentation of Mowi's second quarter results of 2025. My name is Ivan Vindheim, and I'm the CEO of Mowi, and together with our CFO, Kristian Ellingsen, I will take you through the numbers and the fundamentals this morning. To the best of my and our ability, add a few appropriate comments to them. After the presentation, our IRO, Kim Døsvig, will routinely host a Q&A session. Those of you who are following the presentation online can submit your questions or comments in advance or as we go along by email. Please refer to the website at mowi.com for the necessary details. Disclaimer, I think we leave for self-study. With the presentaries, the practicalities, and the disclaimer out of the way, I think we are ready for the highlights of the quarter. To begin with, and on a general note, I think it's fair to say that the second quarter was like the first quarter, characterized by well-supplied markets across the industry, both in the northern and southern hemisphere, driven by strong biology, which led to seasonally record-high industry supply in the quarter and an industry supply growth of as high as 18% year- over- year, which is a number we haven't seen in many years. I think we have to go back to 2012 to see something similar. This put, of course, pressure on the prices in the quarter. For Mowi, however, wrestling with prices was partly offset by seasonally record-high harvest volumes of 133,000 tons in the quarter, which is up by as much as 21% year- over- year for our part, translating into seasonally record-high sales of EUR 1.39 billion and operational profit of EUR 189 million. Further on that note, lower realized blended farming costs, i.e., weighted farming costs for seven farming countries, was significantly down in the quarter and contributed EUR 49 million to earnings in the quarter and EUR 67 million to earnings year to date, following the positive cost trend we have seen over the past few quarters. A measuring kilogram down by EUR 0.45 year- over- year and EUR 0.50 quarter over quarter to EUR 5.39 per kilo in realized production costs in the second quarter, and an expectation of continued good cost performance in the third quarter on economies of scale, in addition to improved biological metrics and lower feed costs in outstanding biomass. All in all, another strong operational quarter for Mowi Farming, I would say, at least when it comes to the things we control ourselves, which are most definitely not the prices, which is where the shoe pinches this year. Carrying on, our two other divisions, Consumer Products and Feed, also delivered strong quarters, I would say, with seasonally record-high results. In terms of our previously announced strategic review of the Feed Division, it's progressing, but beyond that, we will not comment any further on this this morning, out of respect for the integrity of the roasters. Finally, as the last bullet point here reads, our board of directors has decided to distribute a quarterly dividend of NOK 1.45 per share after the second quarter. I think that does it for the highlights of the quarter. We move on to our farming volume guidance, which we have upped since last time we reported from 530,000 tons to now 545,000 tons, which is up from the 520,000 tons we guided for originally when we started this year. This is equivalent to a growth of as high as 8.7% year- over- year. Next year, with Nova Sea on board, we expect to harvest at least 600,000 tons, and that translates to another 10% growth year-over-year. We reaffirm our 2029 organic farming volume target of at least 650,000 tons. This we will achieve through increased smolt stocking and by means of post-smolt. We have still unutilized license capacity in Mowi and several of the countries where we operate, and with post-smolt, we can increase the productivity on licenses already in operation, which are to be set into operation. Mowi's idiosyncratic growth continues unabated after the rather quiet 2010s, as for the latter due to a confluence of factors, which we will not wake up again today. Our farming volume growth is surpassing that of the wider industry and our listed peers by a large margin, cementing our number one position in the market for Atlantic salmon. From the grand scheme of things, to more specifically about the second quarter and first-tier key financial figures. Kristian, we're going through all these numbers in depth and more later this morning, so as not to be too repetitive, we will just touch briefly upon the most important ones now. Turnaround profits, I think we skip as we have just been through them. Let's start with cash and net interest-bearing debt. It stood at EUR 1.90 billion at the end of the quarter, and with Nova Sea on board, it would have been EUR 2.48 billion, with a corresponding pro forma equity ratio of 45%, indicating a sustainable debt level also post-closing of this transaction, which is pending the approval by the European competition authorities, which we expect to have in place sometime in the second half of this year. As we have said previously, we will revert with a new long-term debt target for Mowi post-closing of Nova Sea. Furthermore, underlying earnings per share was EUR 0.25 in the quarter, whilst the annualized return on capital employed was 13.3%. In terms of EV margins for the value chain, we will get back to every single one shortly. Let me go through the different business entities. I think we leave it at that for now and instead move on to prices, which is the elephant in the room this morning. As we said initially this morning, the second quarter was like the first quarter, characterized by well-supplied markets following strong biology across the industry, both in the northern and southern hemisphere, which led to a seasonally record-high industry supply in the quarter and industry supply growth of as high as 18% year-over-year, which is a number we haven't seen in many, many years, putting, of course, pressure on the prices in the quarter. We're now at the time of year where high sea temperatures are translating into even higher industry supply and hence putting further pressure on prices. On a positive note, however, the number of individuals in sea is now relatively stable year-over-year, indicating a normalization of industry supply growth next year at a modest 1% according to our latest figures, which is down from 8% this year, and which under normal circumstances should pave the way for better prices. In our view, 2025 is just an anomaly and an exception to the limited supply growth we have seen in recent years and which we expect to see for a long time to come, and in which our entire growth strategy is grounded, I think it's fair to say. Our own price performance in the quarter, which I would characterize as strong, as it was 11% above the reference price, which is the standard we like to hold ourselves to internally and against which we measure ourselves, as you can hear. Positively impacted by counter share of 24% in the quarter and counter prices above the prevailing spot price, unfortunately, in addition to good harvest weights and a high quality of our fish across the board, which are also important elements for good price performance. With that, I think we are ready to drill down into the different business entities. We start, as usual, with Mowi Norway, the locomotive of our business model. If you take the numbers first, operational profit was EUR 139 million for Mowi Norway in the quarter, whilst margin was EUR 1.91 per kilo and harvest volumes almost 73,000 tons. In another strong quarter for Mowi Norway, I would say, with lower cost year-over-year, as we can see from the chart here, and harvest volumes reaching a seasonally record-high, to mention some. Unfortunately, outweighed by lower prices year-over-year, which is where the shoe pinches this year, as we said just a few minutes ago. These comments apply more or less to all the regions in Mowi Norway in the quarter, including Region Mid, whose margin on this chart is reflective of past sins. If we go behind the numbers for Region Mid in the quarter, we will see that the second quarter was like the first quarter, a reasonably good quarter biologically, suggesting that we could have something going on in this region if we can manage to stay on this course. Otherwise, I have to say it's very encouraging to see that Region South, Region West, and now also Region North continue to deliver industry-leading margins. It's also very satisfying to see that Nova Sea is closing in on Mowi Norway, margin-wise, after a rather soft first quarter to be them, and soon to be us, hopefully. Our volume guidance for Mowi Norway, which we have upped since the first quarter from 315,000 tons to now 320,000 tons. With Nova Sea on board and its 50-odd thousand tons harvest volumes, we are now in a good position to reach the next harvest volume milestone for Mowi Norway of 400,000 tons in the not-too-distant future. Our last slide on Mowi Norway, our sales contract portfolio. Counter share was 23% for Mowi Norway in the quarter and was the red spot on our guidance. These contracts contributed positively to our earnings in the quarter. As for the third quarter, contract level is relatively stable, as you can see from the chart here, with relatively stable contract prices quarter over quarter. With that, I think we can have a look at our six other farming countries. We start, as usual, with Mowi Scotland. Like Mowi Norway, Mowi Scotland leaves behind another strong operational quarter, I would say, with strong biological results. This manifested itself in operational profit of EUR 31 million for Scottish operation and a margin of EUR 1.29 per kilo on quarterly record-high harvest volumes of 24,000 tons. Like Mowi Norway, Mowi Scotland can point to improvements on all fronts in the quarter, apart from price achievement, which is down year-over-year following lower spot prices. Overseas to Chile, Mowi Chile posted operational profit of EUR 18 million in the second quarter, which is substantially better than the EUR 12.5 million we posted in the second quarter last year, notwithstanding much lower prices, in large parts due to lower cost year-over-year. Further on that note, Mowi Chile was our best cost performer in the second quarter, both in terms of cost to stock and in terms of realized cost or relief from stock cost. Their child has many names. Second to none. It can also be mentioned that somewhat higher harvest volumes of 15,500 tons contributed positively to our improved earnings in Chile year-over-year. That was not the case for Mowi Canada, where relatively stable costs and volumes did not offset lower prices, reducing operational profit from EUR 7 million in the second quarter last year to EUR 2 million in this quarter. Biology was, however, good in Canada in the quarter, both in the west and in the east. Over the summer, we have encountered some seasonal issues with algae in British Columbia, and we had one low DO incident at one of our farms in Newfoundland, which combined will impact our third quarter numbers by approximately EUR 5 million, all else being equal. This brings us to our two smallest farming entities, Mowi Island and Mowi Faroes. If we take Mowi Island first, our Irish operation was close to break even in the second quarter with its EUR 1 million in operational profit following soft prices because cost was relatively stable in Ireland in the quarter year-over-year, and harvest volumes reached quarterly record-high 5,000 tons. These comments apply more or less to Mowi Faroes as well in the quarter, which saw a drop in operational profit from EUR 10.5 million in the second quarter last year to EUR 4 million in this quarter, despite almost a doubling of harvest volumes from 2,500 tons - 4,500 tons. Biology was, however, once again strong in the Faroes in the quarter, whilst it was more of a mixed bag in Ireland. Our last farming entity this morning, Arctic Fish, our Atlantic operation. Arctic Fish leaves behind a reasonably good quarter, biologically, I would say, with very low harvest volumes of 2,000 tons and soft prices, took the toll on our profit in Iceland in the quarter and dragged it into negative territory of EUR -5 million. On the positive side, however, our cost-cutting measures in Iceland run the course and pair with more harvest volumes, we still believe we will get the cost level down to a sustainable level in Iceland, as we have it in all other regions in Mowi. We can conclude Mowi farming and move on to Consumer Products, our downstream business. Consumer Products made an operational profit of EUR 52 million in the second quarter, which is seasonally record-high and more than a doubling of the EUR 25 million we made in the second quarter last year, thanks to strong operational performance, of course, but also thanks to lower raw material costs, which is another confirmation of the hedge between Mowi Farming and Mowi Consumer Products, where low prices to farming lead to lower raw material costs for consumer products and hence better earnings, which is one of the positive things that comes with being vertically integrated, in addition to being a good business in itself. Otherwise, we continue to see good demand for our products, although high industry supply is weighing on prices to farming currently. Our last business entity this morning, Mowi Feed. The second quarter is like the first quarter, low season for our feed operation, with all that entails following sea temperatures and feed demand from farming. Adjusted for that, I would say the second quarter was another strong quarter for our feed operation with records left and right. Operational EBITDA of EUR 40 million is seasonally record-high, and so are sold volumes of 135,000 tons. Our feed performance was evidently strong in the quarter. Finally, as we said earlier this morning, our strategic review of this division is progressing, but beyond that, we will not comment any further on this this morning, out of respect for the integrity of the process. Please bear that in mind when we come to the Q&A session after the presentation. With that, Kristian, the floor is all yours. You can take us through the financial figures and the fundamentals. Thank you so far. Thank you very much, Ivan. Good morning, everyone. Hope you're doing well. As usual, we start with the overview of profit and loss, which shows a top line of EUR 1.39 billion, which is a record high level for a second quarter, and an increase from last year on strong volumes. Despite lower cost and higher volumes, there was a negative development in operational EBIT from Q2 last year due to lower prices. Earnings translated into an underlying earnings per share of EUR 0.25. Return on capital employed was 13.3% and return on equity 15.1%. Net cash flow per share improved to EUR 0.11 from EUR 0.06 in Q2 2024. When it comes to the difference between operational EBIT and financial EBIT, this was for the most part explained by the net fair value adjustment on biomass, which was negative this time around related to the price development. With regards to associated companies, this was mainly related to Nova Sea, and the operational result was EUR 1.67 per kilo in Q2. We still expect competition clearance sometime in the second half, and from that point, Nova Sea will be consolidated into the group figures. We then move on to the balance sheet, which was stable compared with Q2 2024. Mowi's financial position is strong, with an equity ratio of 47%. Pro forma covenant equity ratio, including the effects of the Nova Sea acquisition, would have been 45% or 49% measured on the covenant methodology. Net interest-bearing debt was quite stable during the quarter. Working capital was neutral, with the effect of lower cash cost in farming being offset by other working capital fluctuations. Tax payments are lower than last year, and while CapEx was somewhat up, interest payments have decreased as expected with lower interest rates on our euro-based financing. With regards to net interest-bearing debt, we will come back with an updated long-term target after closing of the Nova Sea transaction. We maintain the guidance on the cash flow items listed here for the full year of 2025. We leave the details here for self-study. On the financing side, we have refinanced the bank facility, which is our main source of external financing. The previous EUR 2 billion facility, which was maturing in 2026, is replaced by a EUR 2.6 billion facility maturing in 2030. The covenant structure is maintained with only a 35% equity covenant. There is a EUR 400 million accordion option, and the lenders are DNB, Nordea, ABN Amro, Rabobank, Danske Bank, SEB, and Credit Agricole. We are glad to cooperate with renowned banks that have good faith in our company and in our business. In addition to the credit facility, we have two green bonds and also a short shine. When the latter is refinanced, we will get to 100% green financing. A low financing cost is important, and the same goes for the costs related to our main operations. Here we have some positive messages today. As shown in the graph above here, we see that the blended farming costs across our regions have, of course, increased in recent years, driven by feed prices and high inflation. On a positive note, feed prices decreased in 2024. This has continued in 2025. We have had a lot of cost measures which also contributed to lower costs. The cash cost has come down, and the cost per kilo standing biomass in sea has been reduced. This has also started to show in the realized cost figures, as we also see here from the graph. Q2 cost was down to EUR 5.39 per kilo blended. That was the lowest level since 2022. In euro terms, this is a saving of EUR 49 million, and the corresponding year-to-date figure was EUR 67 million. If you look more closely at the feed prices, these are down 8% from Q2 last year. The cost at stock for standing biomass is down with the same magnitude. We have expectations of continued decline in feed prices due to positive raw material price developments. We expect this to contribute to further reductions in cash cost and in P&L cost. We see the P&L cost down in 2025 and further down in 2026. When it comes to the Q3 P&L cost, we see currently that this is relatively stable from Q2. It is very positive that our various cost measures are showing in our numbers. Since 2020, the cost focus has been significantly increased in Mowi, including clearly stating cost as one of our strategic pillars. Operational improvements across the value chain and the cost-saving programs in recent years, with almost 2,000 different initiatives, that has, of course, given results. We have a very good starting point for our cost work, as we are the number one or the number two performer in the various regions we operate, as shown in the graph below. On a positive note, the three-year average shows that we are now number one also in Norway. We are by no means finished with our cost work. We have identified a potential for EUR 300 million - EUR 400 million in the next five years in cost savings. This is related to post-smolt, Mowi 4.0, yield, automation, in addition to the cost-saving programs and the productivity program. That keyword brings us to the next slide, productivity and FTEs. Salary and personnel costs, that is the second largest cost item for Mowi. Since we initiated the productivity program in 2020, we have reduced close to 3,500 FTEs on a like-for-like basis. According to me, that's quite impressive. If you look at nominal FTEs, they are down 8% in a time with significant volume increase for Mowi. Productivity has improved significantly, which we will see more details on on the next slide. This has been achieved through automation, right-sizing, natural turnover through retirement, reduced overtime, and reduced external contracted labor. It has been an effort from the entire organization. We are very glad to see that this is giving results on the FTEs, on productivity, also on the costs. This slide shows some more details on our achievement when it comes to productivity. It also includes some 2026 estimates. In Mowi Farming, we have a 36% improved productivity, i.e., increase on tons per employee. In Farming Norway, we started on a higher level, but we have achieved as much as a 23% productivity increase also here. In downstream, the number is impressive, 39% productivity improvement. This has been achieved through automation, digitalization, combined with a general focus on FTEs, a lot of concrete initiatives, plans for the various departments, business units, and the hard work from the organization. A lot has happened in this area since the productivity program was launched five years ago, almost to the day five years ago. We then move on to the market fundamentals in the quarter. In the second quarter, there was a significant supply growth of 18%, the highest we have seen since 2012. This was driven by strong biological performance, and 2025 is a recovery year on industry supply after three years of zero growth in practice. Supply was higher from all the major producing regions, including Norway. We see that in Norway, high harvesting in July, lower feed sales, have reduced the biomass growth for the industry to an estimated 2% year on year in July, down from 13% at the end of Q1. The number of individuals for the industry in sea in Norway is down 3% year on year. The global biomass figures show a modest plus 1% change in the number of individuals in sea per end July. In our view, these numbers limit the potential for further supply growth for the remainder of 2025 and into 2026, compared with the year before. Inventory buildup was immaterial and consumption increased by 17%. Global demand for salmon was good during the quarter, increased 5% year on year in value terms on significantly increased consumption. This was partially offset by lower blended prices. We have started to see declining shelf prices in retail. This is positive for demand, and we expect further drop ahead with lower spot prices and promotions. Overall, market development remained good. Consumption in Europe increased by 15% from Q2 2024, supported by strong retail performance in the major regions, Western Europe, Central Europe, including Germany, and also the U.K.. Consumption in the U.S. increased by 13%, with growth mainly driven by retail. The fresh prepacked category continued to be the key here, confirming solid demand in the higher value segment of the market. The development was further supported by Mowi's strong growth in the skin pack sales, which are up 24% year on year. The online grocery segment was also solid, with e-commerce volumes more than doubling compared with 2024. Consumption in Asia increased by 40%, and we had strong development in all major markets, particularly in China, with a 52% increase in consumption year on year. This was driven by better availability of large-sized fish, eased import restrictions, and lower price points. Food service consumption also improved. Of course, spot prices have been impacted by a temporary high supply. We have expectations of a tighter market in 2026, as we have already touched upon. That is also according to consensus. This slide provides more detail on the industry supply situation. There was no growth in 2022 to 2024, and then we have 8% now in 2025 is the estimate, which we expect to fall to 1% in 2026. The inflection point on year-over-year growth is now in August, and the next 12 months, the growth estimate is 1%. When it comes to roam guidance, we have adjusted this up by 15,000 tons - 545,000 tons, following favorable developments in sea and high harvest volumes. We conclude this section, and we are ready for Ivan and some comments on the outlook. Thank you, Kristian. Much appreciated. It is time to conclude with some closing remarks before we wrap it all up with our Q&A session hosted by our IRO, Kim Døsvig. To begin with, and on a general note, as already said earlier this morning, the second quarter was characterized like the first quarter by well-supplied markets following strong biology across the industry, both in the northern and southern hemisphere, which led to seasonally record-high industry supply and an industry supply growth of as high as 18% year-over-year in the quarter, which is a number we haven't seen in many, many years, and which put, of course, pressure on the prices in the quarter. We are now at the time of year where high sea temperatures are translating into even higher industry supply and putting further pressure on the prices. On a positive note, however, the number of individuals in sea is now relatively stable year-over-year, indicating a normalization of industry supply growth next year at a modest 1%, as we just heard Kristian say, which is down from 8% this year and which under normal circumstances should pave the way for better prices. In our view, 2025 is just an anomaly and an exception to the limited supply growth we have seen in recent years and which we expect to see also in the coming years and in which our entire growth strategy is grounded, I think is fair to say. Otherwise, we continue to see good demand for our products, and with the recent developments in geopolitics, it looks like we will avoid a trade war this time, which is, of course, very, very important for an international product like the salmon. Despite current headwinds in the markets, I would argue that the future still looks bright for this fantastic protein. Carrying on, our operations continue to develop positively, both on land and in the sea, I would say. Further to this, we have upped our farming volume guidance for this year from 530,000 tons since last time we reported to now 545,000 tons, which is up from 520,000 tons when we guided for this year the first time back in November last year. This is equivalent to a growth of as high as 8.7% year-over-year. Next year, we expect to harvest at least 600,000 tons with Nova Sea on board, and that translates to an over 10% growth year-over-year. Mowi's idiosyncratic growth continues unabated and is now surpassing that of the wider industry and our listed peers by a large margin. It is very, very encouraging to see that cost has come somewhat down after a few years of unprecedented inflation. Once again, a big thank you to all of my colleagues who have made all of this happen. With that, Kristian and Kim, I think we are ready for the Q&A session. If Kristian can please join me on the stage and help me out with answering some of the questions, and then you, Kim, can administer the questions from the audience and from the web. Thank you, Ivan. The first question is from Alexander Sloan in Barclays. He's got two questions. The first one on cost. Can you break down the expectation for stable cost outlook for H2 versus Q2? If feed costs are expected to be an incremental tailwind, are you expecting more challenging biological conditions or just lower operational leverage to offset this feed tailwind? Yeah, I would say that we have a very positive message when it comes to cost here today. We see that the Q2 cost is down to EUR 5.39 per kilo blended. I think it's fair to say that that was a larger reduction than was expected really by the market in advance. We are talking about a reduction to down in Q3 to a good level. We have indicated that that level will continue to go down. We have said that we expect further reduction in 2026 and that the cost at stock is down in the biomass in sea. Of course, if you look at Q3 compared with Q2, we have to remember that there can always be phasing effects, right? When it comes to the feed price reductions, that's not necessarily a 100% smooth downwards effect all the time. Sometimes it goes a little bit stepwise. If you look at the biomass to be harvested in a specific quarter, then we have our forecast. I think it's important to look a little bit beyond the phasing effects here in the P&L and look at the bigger picture. That is that we say that the cost is going down. We expect further reductions on the feed price. That means that we also expect both cash cost and the P&L cost to come further down from this level. Very clear. The second one, maybe to you, Ivan, on tariffs. You had at Q1 indicated tariffs were manageable at 10%, but would be a concern if higher than that. What is the outlook at 15% for Norway? Not much has really changed in my view. I think this outcome is the best outcome we could hope for. For us, this hasn't changed anything. We also have, what shall I say, a relative advantage in this because of our production in America. We source the U.S. first and foremost from Chile and Canada. Compared to our peers, it gives us a small edge, but all in all, I don't think this is a make or break for the industry. I think this outcome was as good as we could hope for. In total, we're talking about 10% impact on demand, at least over time. That's also something we can deal with, I think. Our take is actually positive. Let's hope this was it because that part we don't know. Knut Eva Backens, Sparbanken A&M Markets, has a question about contract prices. Can you comment on contract expectations for next year? Any more comments on share of contracts and also price expectations, if any? Yeah, the short answer is no. We are negotiating as we speak, and I think we have to play the cards close to our chest. Sorry, this we will have to revert to at a later stage. Alexander Aukner, DNB, has got a question about supply. Are we able to build new markets with current supply boosts? Any markets in particular worth mentioning? We have a lot of focus on the market work in our organization. We are present in all the major markets, and we have a big presence in the largest salmon market in the world, the U.S., where we have had a lot of different developments on products, on logistics, on distribution, new contracts. This is really also the plan and the work we do in all the major regions. I think that it's positive that we now see, of course, also that shelf prices are coming somewhat down. We see that in June, we are talking about around 7% reduction in shelf prices, at least in Europe, in retail. That's higher than the general reduction in shelf prices for Q2. I think we will see more of that development on promotions, on lower spot prices. That's also positive when it comes to building markets and really making this fantastic product more available and having it out there and having the good demand for this product. Of course, the higher shelf prices and the delays in having these spot price reductions taking fully out in the value chain, that has had some tailwinds for, or headwinds for demand, sorry. I think that we are now seeing the right development with some shelf prices starting to come down. This is a big focus, of course. Very good. No more questions. Right. It only remains for me to thank everyone for the attention. We hope to see you back already in November at our third quarter release, if not before. In the meantime, take care and have a great day ahead. Thank you.